Next Article in Journal
Ephedra alata Subsp. Alenda as a Novel Source of Bioactive Phytochemicals: Characterization Based on the Mass Spectrometry and Profiling of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Nematode-Induced Growth Factors Related to Angiogenesis in Autoimmune Disease Attenuation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Convalescent Plasma to Treat COVID-19: A Two-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/life13020322
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inflammation as Prognostic Hallmark of Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

by
Diana Fuzio
1,*,†,
Angelo Michele Inchingolo
2,†,
Vitalba Ruggieri
1,
Massimo Fasano
3,
Maria Federico
3,
Manuela Mandorino
2,
Lavinia Dirienzo
4,
Salvatore Scacco
5,
Alessandro Rizzello
5,
Maurizio Delvecchio
6,
Massimiliano Parise
7,
Roberto Rana
7,
Nicola Faccilongo
7,
Biagio Rapone
2,
Francesco Inchingolo
2,
Antonio Mancini
2,
Maria Celeste Fatone
8,
Antonio Gnoni
5,‡,
Gianna Dipalma
2,‡ and
Giovanni Dirienzo
1,‡
1
Clinical Pathology Unit, Murgia Hospital, Asl Bari, 70022 Altamura, Italy
2
Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Infectious Diseases Complex Unit, Murgia Hospital, Asl Bari, 70022 Altamura, Italy
4
Universitary Clinical Pathology Complex Unit, School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
5
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
6
Metabolic Disorders and Diabetes Unit, “Giovanni XXIII” Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
7
Department of Economics, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
8
PTA Trani, ASL BT, Internal Medicine Surgery, Viale Padre Pio, 76125 Trani, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors also contributed equally to this work.
Life 2023, 13(2), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020322
Submission received: 16 November 2022 / Revised: 30 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is often characterized by a life-threatening interstitial pneumonia requiring hospitalization. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to identify hallmarks of in-hospital mortality in patients affected by Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). A total of 150 patients admitted for COVID-19 from March to June 2021 to “F. Perinei” Murgia Hospital in Altamura, Italy, were divided into survivors (n = 100) and non-survivors groups (n = 50). Blood counts, inflammation-related biomarkers and lymphocyte subsets were analyzed into two groups in the first 24 h after admission and compared by Student’s t-test. A multivariable logistic analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Total lymphocyte count and CD3+ and CD4+ CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets were significantly lower in non-survivors. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were significantly higher in non-survivors. Age > 65 years and presence of comorbidities were identified as independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality, while IL-6 and LDH showed a borderline significance. According to our results, markers of inflammation and lymphocytopenia predict in-hospital mortality in COVID-19.

1. Introduction

From March 2019 to the present, the pandemic caused by a novel betacoronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has quickly spread from the city of Wuhan (China) to the entire world, with a variable trend characterized by flattening periods of the pandemic curve and periods of re-emergency [1]. Up-to-date information from the World Health Organization (WHO) reports 663,248,631 confirmed cases of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) and 6,709,387 deaths (https://covid19.who.int/, accessed on 19 January 2023). The clinical course of COVID-19 is characterized by markedly divergent clinical manifestations. Aside from asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic cases, nearly 20% of patients had severe bilateral interstitial pneumonia, which was associated with a rapid deterioration of clinical condition and necessitated hospitalization [2]. In COVID-19, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is triggered by an immune-mediated systemic inflammation, which often leads to death [3]. This pro-inflammatory state is reflected in specific laboratory parameters, such as blood count and markers of systemic inflammation. In severe COVID-19, some altered parameters are common to septic states, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin, D-dimers and fibrinogen, while others indicate, more specifically, a hyper-activation of the immune system and are often present in systemic autoimmune diseases, such as pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, e.g., interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), and reduction of both total lymphocytes and specific lymphocyte subsets [4,5,6].
The understanding of the clinical and biochemical effects of COVID-19 is constantly expanding. Several strategies for dealing with this global emergency have been developed, ranging from preventive measures, from individual protection devices, isolation of positive cases and vaccines, to adjuvant therapies and specific antiviral treatments [7,8,9]. Due to the extreme variety of the spectrum of clinical manifestations of COVID-19, it is advisable to tailor preventive and therapeutic choices according to the characteristics of the patients. For instance, it is worth noting that elder patients and patients with pre-existing pathological conditions and comorbidities are at a higher risk of developing a severe outcome of COVID-19 [10]. Thus, it is crucial for physicians to distinguish, as soon as possible, the patients who will suffer from severe illness and are at risk of death, especially in the hospital setting during pandemic waves.
The aim of this retrospective study is to detail the clinical and laboratoristic features of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a center of Southern Italy, identifying significant differences between the groups of survivors and non-survivors, and independent factors of death, in an attempt to define threshold values indicative of patient outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

A total of 150 patients hospitalized from March to June 2021 in the public hospital “F. Perinei” Murgia Hospital in Altamura, Italy, were enrolled; patients were divided into survivors (n = 100, group 1) and non-survivors (n = 50, group 2) according to the clinical outcome. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of “Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico”, Bari, Italy (0015987, 17 February 2022), and it was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki for human studies.

2.2. COVID-19 RT-PCR Assay for Nasal and Pharyngeal Swab Specimens

Real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens was employed to confirm COVID-19. Briefly, RNA extraction was performed using a NeoPlex COVID-19 Detection kit (GeneMatrix Inc., Temecula, CA, USA) on a KingFisher Extraction System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification conditions included reverse transcription at 50 °C for 30 min, denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s for fluoresce detection. A cycle threshold value (Ct-value) ≤ 38 was defined as a positive test, following Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations.

2.3. Laboratory Medicine Analyses and Clinical Data Collection

Laboratory medicine analyses (e.g., blood routine, lymphocyte subsets and inflammation-related biomarkers) were performed on patients’ blood samples collected and analyzed in the first 24 h after admission to the Infective Diseases Department of “F. Perinei” Murgia Hospital. The total number of lymphocytes in peripheral blood was counted with an automated hematology analyzer (Pentra ABX, HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan). An Olympus AU680 (Beckman Coulter Brea, CA, USA) was used to collect LDH and CRP data. PCT was determined by Liaison (DiaSorin S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy). IL-6 and ferritin were measured by ADVIA Centaur XP Immunoassay System (SIEMENS Health, Erlangen, Germany, GmbH). D-Dimers and Fibrinogen values were measured by ACL TOP 500 (Werfen, Bedford, MA USA). Peripheral blood lymphocyte typing was performed in patients’ whole blood samples by cytofluorimetric analysis using AQUIOS CL Flow Cytometer (AQUIOS—Beckman Coulter CA, USA). Antibodies used for cell staining were TETRA-1 Panel (CD45, CD4, CD8 and CD3), and obtained data were analyzed using flow cytometry analysis software (Aquios system software, V2.2.0).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by setting categorical variables as frequency rates and percentages, and continuous variables as means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) or median and interquartile range (IQR) values. The comparison of means for continuous variables that were normally distributed was performed with Student’s t-test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables there were not normally distributed. Proportions for categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using the Wilson/Brown method (95% confidence interval and standard error). Multinomial binary logistic regression analysis results were reported as Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% CI. Statistical analyses were performed by MedCalc® (Mariakerke, Belgium) and GraphPad Prism version 8.2 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Two-sided p-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The median age of the patients was 70 years, showing a statistically significant difference between non-survivors and survivors (79 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001) (Table 1).
Male patients were significantly older than females (79 vs. 71 years), while the median period from the onset of the symptoms to hospital admission was the same in females and males (7 days). One hundred and twenty-six patients (84%) had comorbidities such as hypertension (55.3%), diabetes mellitus (24%), chronic cardiac disease (22.6%), malignancies (4.6%), obesity (35.3%), chronic pulmonary disease (8%), chronic kidney disease (7.3%) and chronic neurological disorders (16%) (Table 2).
All the patients with severe and moderate disease were given empirical antimicrobial treatment (cephalosporin, azithromycin and levofloxacin). Nineteen patients (12%) received antiviral therapy with remdesivir. In addition, all severe and moderate cases were administered corticosteroids (CTS) during hospitalization. Nine patients (6%) received hyperimmune plasma, and thirty-four patients (22%) required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (Table 3).
At baseline, 102 patients (68%) needed respiratory support by continuous positive airway pressure, 25 patients (16.7%) by a Venturi-type mask, 18 patients (12%) by a simple face mask. Compared with the reference range, significant differences in blood count, lymphocyte subsets and inflammatory-related biomarkers were observed between survivor and non-survivor groups (Table 4).
The median lymphocyte count was lower in the non-survivors group (p < 0.0001). When we tested different subsets of T cells, we found that even though both helper T cells (CD3+CD4+) and suppressor T cells (CD3+CD8+) in patients with COVID-19 were below reference range (CD3+CD4+: 500–1700 cells/µL, CD3+CD8+: 244–1100 cells/µL), the lowering of helper T cells was considerably pronounced in fatal cases (184 vs. 353 cells/uL; p < 0.0001). Suppressor T cells also showed a decreasing trend (83 vs. 172 cells/uL; p < 0.0001). Conversely, T-helper and T-suppressor ratio (CD4+/CD8+ ratio) remained in the normal range and showed no difference between the two subgroups. As shown in Figure 1, the area under the curve (AUC) derived from CD8+ T cells was as large as that derived from CD3+ cells or CD4+ cells (AUC CD8+ = 0.741 [0.655–0.827] vs. AUC CD3+ = 0.769 [0.690–0.848] or AUC CD4+ = 0.752 [0.670–0.833], p < 0.001).
Non-survivors had significantly higher serum levels of IL-6, LDH, CRP and PCT than survivors (Table 4). Conversely, except for fibrinogen, no significant differences were found in the levels of D-dimers and ferritin between the two groups. Figure 2 shows that the AUC of IL-6 was 0.735 [0.651–0.818] and LDH was 0.784 [0.703–0.864] (p < 0.001), and age and comorbidities had AUCs of 0.805 [0.736–0.873] and 0.709 [0.622–0.800], respectively.
By multivariable logistic regression analysis, two indicators were identified to be independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality: age > 65 years (OR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07–1.22, p = 0.0001) and number of comorbidities (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.11–3.05; p = 0.0178). IL-6 levels > 20 pg/mL (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.06) and LDH levels > 489 U/L (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01) showed a borderline 95% CI (Table 5).

4. Discussion

Infection by SARS-CoV-2 can cause sustained responses of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (namely, a “cytokine storm”), leading to a life-threatening immune-mediated MODS [3]. The identification of specific immunological and inflammatory profiles of patients, and their association with COVID-19 severity, is a challenge in order to promptly block systemic inflammation with targeted therapeutic interventions and, on the other hand, minimize unnecessary treatments, especially during pandemic waves.
In this study, we investigated the predictive values of markers of inflammation and lymphocytopenia in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients, already assessed in other previous studies, with, in part, conflicting results. Our research showed that non-surviving hospitalized COVID-19 patients had significantly higher PCT, CRP, LDH and IL-6 levels, which are indicators of both in-hospital mortality and inflammation. Age and comorbidities—particularly hypertension, obesity, diabetes and chronic heart disease—were found to be independent risk factors linked to in-hospital mortality, while LDH and IL-6 showed a borderline significance.
PCT, the precursor of the hormone calcitonin, is an acute-phase glycoprotein produced by C-cells of thyroids and monocytes. PCT dramatically increases during bacterial and fungal infections while slightly increasing during viral infections, making it an important biomarker of sepsis. In our series of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, PCT levels correlated with disease severity. Data on the value of PCT as prognostic markers for COVID-19 are contradictory in the literature. When compared to moderate illness, PCT is four times higher in severe patients and eight times higher in critical patients, according to Hu R. et al. [11]. Likewise, several authors found that PCT levels are increased in patients with a fatal outcome of severe COVID-19 both at admission and during the course of hospitalization [10,12,13]. In addition, Sayah W. et al. assessed that PCT and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are not influenced by the administration of CTS. For this reasons, they may constitute valid alternative markers to assess severe forms in patients already undergoing CTS [14]. The markedly increased levels of PCT in COVID-19 patients can be explained by several factors: a coexistent bacterial infection, prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation and the up-regulation of the signal transducer and activator of the transcription 3 (STAT3)-dependent pathway, which stimulates angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and PCT production in monocytes [15,16,17]. Accordingly, other clinical trials refuted the negative prognostic value of PCT in severe COVID-19 [18,19].
CRP is a non-specific acute-phase glycoprotein produced by the liver in response to trauma, myocardial ischemia and infections. Bacterial infections usually determine a marked increase of CRP, while viral infections are associated with a mild increase in CRP levels. In our study, CRP was significantly higher in non-survivor COVID-19 patients compared with survivor groups. CRP proved to be one of the earliest negative prognostic markers in COVID-19 because its levels increased before the appearance of radiologic findings at chest computer tomography (CT) [20]. Furthermore, CRP levels increased both at the beginning and during the progression of COVID-19 disease, and correlated with severity and mortality [20,21]. Several authors tried to improve the predictive value of CRP by relating it to other parameters, such as the CRP/albumin ratio and the CRP/lymphocytes ratio [22,23]. In particular, CRP is associated with in-hospital mortality due to venous thromboembolism and acute kidney injury [24], and a value of CRP equal to or higher than 40 mg/L is considered life-threatening in COVID-19-hospitalized patients [25].
LDH is an enzyme of the oxidoreductase class produced by different cells that is released into the blood as a result of cell damage or high turnover, such as in cancer, trauma, inflammation or infection. Other authors have assessed that LDH is correlated with poor prognosis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, also indicating lung and other tissue injuries [26,27]. Thus, COVID-19 may lead to inadequate tissue perfusion and MODS, causing LDH elevation [28]. Thus, high values of LDH could represent a valid biomarker of mortality due to widespread infection in COVID-19.
In our study, we also showed that lymphocyte counts in COVID-19 patients and the CD3+ and CD4+CD8+ subsets were significantly lower, especially in the non-survivor group. Lymphocytopenia indicates a dysregulation of the immune system and has been observed in COVID-19 patients showing different spectrums of clinical disease [5,24]. Consisting with the literature data, we found a significant decrease of total peripheral lymphocyte counts and T cell main subsets (CD3+ and CD4+CD8+) in both the survivor and non-survivor groups, even if these parameters were significantly lower in the latter group. The etiopathogenesis of lymphocytopenia in COVID-19 patients has been related to different causes. ACE2, identified as the main cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is low-expressed by lymphocytes, and the viral genome is rarely detectable in peripheral blood of infected patients [29]. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that the decrease of peripheral lymphocytes is not ascribable to the direct damage of SARS-CoV-2 on lymphocytes, but rather to an exhaustion of them in terms both of number and function due to the persistent exposure to viral antigens [30,31]. An alternative explanation is that the decrease of peripheral lymphocytes is a result of activation-induced apoptosis or aggressive migration from peripheral blood to the lungs, where robust viral replication occurs [32]. Lymphocytopenia in COVID-19 may be related to hyper-activation of STING (stimulator of interferon genes) due to DNA damage following acute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS). STING is able to activate the NF–κB pathway and also to determine a progressive CD4+CD8+ T lymphocytopenia, similar to what occurs in STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) syndromes [33].
Several studies detected a significant reduction in total lymphocytes count and in CD3+ and CD4+CD8+ T-cell subsets, both at the early stages and in severe forms of COVID-19-associated disease in deceased hospitalized patients compared to survivors [34,35,36,37]. Interestingly, a Brazilian study found that reduction of T-cell subtypes is a prognostic factor not only of death but also of need for intubation [38]. In addition to lymphocyte subsets, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been considered a sensible parameter of negative outcome in COVID-19 [38,39].
The reduction of lymphocytes in COVID-19 also affects B cells and NK (natural killer) cells, as suggested by other studies, highlighting a significant reduction of CD19+ and NK cell count in hospitalized patients, which correlated with progression of disease and death [34,40].
Cytokines have been thought to play an important role in immunity and immunopathology during virus infections. “Cytokines storm” is a phenomenon of excessive inflammatory reaction in which cytokines are rapidly produced in large amounts in response to microbial infection, as well as to therapies, pathogens, cancers, autoimmune conditions and monogenic disorders [41]. This phenomenon has been considered an important contributor to ARDS and MODS in COVID-19 patients [3]. It has been reported that the levels of IL-6, interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-7 (IL-7), IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon gamma induced protein (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α) were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients [42,43,44,45,46].
IL-6 is a protein produced by various types of cells, particularly T lymphocytes, macrophages, mature adipocytes and myocytes, in response to tissue damage from trauma, infection or inflammation, exerting both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects [47].
In several studies, IL-6 has been proven to be an independent factor predictive of in-hospital mortality, and its levels are not influenced by the administration of CTS [14,42,43]. In particular, high levels of IL-6 are indicative of lung involvement, acute kidney injury, brain damage, cardiovascular events, and, finally, intestinal permeability, which allows viruses to become widespread in the general circulation [48,49,50,51,52]. The value of IL-6 has been included in a score system that predicts the need for non-invasive ventilation by combining systemic inflammatory biomarkers and a chest CT severity score [53].
Besides IL-6 and LDH, other laboratory parameters are cited in the literature as independent risk factors of death in COVID-19, such as neutrophil count, platelet count, CRP, D-dimers, troponin-I and low total testosterone [54,55,56,57].
We found that age and comorbidities—primarily hypertension and obesity, followed by diabetes, chronic cardiac disease, chronic neurological disorders, chronic pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease and malignancies—are independent risk factors of COVID-19 mortality [25,50]. Consistently, other studies reported that patients older than 65 suffering from comorbidities experienced more severe symptoms, MODS and death [27,58]. Hypertension and obesity are the most frequent comorbidities in patients with severe or fatal COVID-19, and the main cause of death after ARDS is a cardiovascular acute event, such as myocardial dysfunction, arrhythmia or shock [10,12,13,26,59,60]. Instead, according to other authors, COVID-19-deceased patients presented, at admission, more frequently with chronic kidney disease and neurological diseases [13]. Obesity, diabetes and chronic kidney disease are also independent risk factors for intubation, as well as death [61]. Other pre-existing pathological conditions, such as anemia, hypotension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and use of CTS, have been reported as independent risk factors of severe COVID-19 [26,53,62,63].

5. Conclusions

SARS-CoV-2 induces serious infectious diseases and becomes a continuous threat to human health. A rapid and well-coordinated immune response is the first line of defense against viral infections. However, when the immune response is dysregulated, it will result in excessive inflammation, even causing death. The higher expression of proinflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 patients, especially in severe cases, with the consumption of CD4+CD8+ T cells might result in aggravated inflammatory responses, the production of cytokine storms and clinical conditions worsening.
Our findings demonstrated that lymphocyte counts and CD3+ and CD4+CD8+ subsets were significantly lower in COVID-19 patients, particularly in the non-survivor group. IL-6, LDH, CRP and PCT levels were significantly higher in non-survivor hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19, representing not only markers of inflammation but also in-hospital mortality. Age and comorbidities, especially hypertension, obesity, diabetes and chronic heart disease, were identified as independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Elevated LDH and IL-6 levels may be substantial risk factors for in-hospital mortality even though they did not achieve significance as independent risk variables.
Even though our findings resulted from a monocentric study and the time frame for patient enrollment was limited, they highlighted the pivotal role of IL-6, LDH, CRP and PCT in predicting mortality for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Nevertheless, the results of this study should be confirmed in further larger controlled trials, while also developing scoring systems to assess the severity of COVID-19 disease, correlating every stage to a specific risk of mortality. On the other hand, it appears critical to establish prognostic survival factors for COVID-19 patients in order to screen the most vulnerable patients, organize targeted therapeutic interventions and reduce healthcare costs and waste.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.F., A.M.I., F.I., L.D. and M.C.F.; methodology, A.G., D.F., M.D., M.M., S.S. and V.R.; software, A.M., F.I., G.D. (Gianna Dipalma), M.C.F. and N.F.; validation, A.R., D.F., F.I., G.D. (Gianna Dipalma), M.F. (Massimo Fasano) and M.P.; formal analysis, B.R., D.F., V.R., F.I., G.D. (Gianna Dipalma), L.D., M.F. (Maria Federico) and R.R.; resources, A.G., A.M.I., A.R., M.C.F., M.M. and M.P.; data curation, F.I., G.D. (Gianna Dipalma), D.F., M.F. (Massimo Fasano), M.F. (Maria Federico), N.F. and V.R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.F., V.R., A.M., A.M.I., B.R., F.I., G.D. (Giovanni Dirienzo) and R.R.; writing—review and editing, A.G., D.F., V.R., A.M.I., F.I., G.D. (Gianna Dipalma) and M.C.F.; visualization, A.G., A.M.I., F.I., G.D. (Gianna Dipalma), M.C.F., M.D. and S.S.; supervision, A.M.I., F.I., D.F., G.D. (Giovanni Dirienzo), G.D. (Gianna Dipalma) and S.S.; project administration, F.I. and G.D. (Giovanni Dirienzo). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACE2angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
ARDSacute respiratory distress syndrome
CIconfidence intervals
COVID-19Coronavirus Disease
CRPC-reactive protein
G-CSFgranulocyte colony-stimulating factor
IL-2interkeukine-2
IL-6interleukin-6
IL-7interleukin-7
IL-10interleukin-10
IP-10interferon gamma-induced protein 10 kDa
IQRinterquartile range
LDHlactate dehydrogenase
MCP-1monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
MIP-1αmacrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha
MODSmultiple organ dysfunction syndrome
NKnatural killer
ORodds ratio
PCTprocalcitonin
RT-PCRreal-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain reaction
SARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
STAT3signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor-alpha

References

  1. Khan, M.; Adil, S.F.; Alkhathlan, H.Z.; Tahir, M.N.; Saif, S.; Khan, M.; Khan, S.T. COVID-19: A Global Challenge with Old History, Epidemiology and Progress So Far. Molecules 2020, 26, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiang, S.; Du, L.; Shi, Z. An emerging coronavirus causing pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China: Calling for developing therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 275–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Montazersaheb, S.; Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S.M.; Hejazi, M.S.; Tarhriz, V.; Farjami, A.; Ghasemian Sorbeni, F.; Farahzadi, R.; Ghasemnejad, T. COVID-19 infection: An overview on cytokine storm and related interventions. Virol. J. 2022, 19, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ji, P.; Zhu, J.; Zhong, Z.; Li, H.; Pang, J.; Li, B.; Zhang, J. Association of elevated inflammatory markers and severe COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, e23315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tavakolpour, S.; Rakhshandehroo, T.; Wei, E.X.; Rashidian, M. Lymphopenia during the COVID-19 infection: What it shows and what can be learned. Immunol. Lett. 2020, 225, 31–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fatone, M.C. COVID-19: A Great Mime or a Trigger Event of Autoimmune Manifestations? Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2021, 17, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  7. Meng, J.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Huang, Q.; Nie, D.; Fan, K.; Guo, W.; Zhao, Z.; Han, Z. A Review of Potential Therapeutic Strategies for COVID-19. Viruses 2022, 14, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Inchingolo, A.D.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Bordea, I.R.; Malcangi, G.; Xhajanka, E.; Scarano, A.; Lorusso, F.; Farronato, M.; Tartaglia, G.M.; Isacco, C.G.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Disease Adjuvant Therapies and Supplements Breakthrough for the Infection Prevention. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Inchingolo, A.D.; Dipalma, G.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Malcangi, G.; Santacroce, L.; D’Oria, M.T.; Isacco, C.G.; Bordea, I.R.; Candrea, S.; Scarano, A.; et al. The 15-Months Clinical Experience of SARS-CoV-2: A Literature Review of Therapies and Adjuvants. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, F.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Liang, B.; Li, L.; Ye, T.; Li, L.; Liu, D.; Gui, S.; Hu, Y.; et al. Factors associated with death outcome in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): A case-control study. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, R.; Han, C.; Pei, S.; Yin, M.; Chen, X. Procalcitonin levels in COVID-19 patients. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Todor, S.B.; Bîrluțiu, V.; Topîrcean, D.; Mihăilă, R.G. Role of biological markers and CT severity score in predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19: An observational retrospective study. Exp. Ther. Med. 2022, 24, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Poskurica, M.; Stevanović, Đ.; Zdravković, V.; Čekerevac, I.; Ćupurdija, V.; Zdravković, N.; Nikolić, T.; Marković, M.; Jovanović, M.; Popović, M.; et al. Admission Predictors of Mortality in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients-A Serbian Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sayah, W.; Berkane, I.; Guermache, I.; Sabri, M.; Lakhal, F.Z.; Yasmine Rahali, S.; Djidjeli, A.; Lamara Mahammed, L.; Merah, F.; Belaid, B.; et al. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: Potential immune-inflammatory parameters to identify severe and fatal forms of COVID-19. Cytokine 2021, 141, 155428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lugito, N.P.H. Is procalcitonin a part of human immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 infection or “just” a marker of bacterial coinfection? Curr. Res. Transl. Med. 2021, 69, 103289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pink, I.; Raupach, D.; Fuge, J.; Vonberg, R.P.; Hoeper, M.M.; Welte, T.; Rademacher, J. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for antimicrobial stewardship in COVID-19. Infection 2021, 49, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Heer, R.S.; Mandal, A.K.; Kho, J.; Szawarski, P.; Csabi, P.; Grenshaw, D.; Walker, I.A.; Missouris, C.G. Elevated procalcitonin concentrations in severe Covid-19 may not reflect bacterial co-infection. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2021, 58, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dolci, A.; Robbiano, C.; Aloisio, E.; Chibireva, M.; Serafini, L.; Falvella, F.S.; Pasqualetti, S.; Panteghini, M. Searching for a role of procalcitonin determination in COVID-19: A study on a selected cohort of hospitalized patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020, 59, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, F.; Li, L.; Xu, M.; Wu, J.; Luo, D.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Song, X.; Zhou, X. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tan, C.; Huang, Y.; Shi, F.; Tan, K.; Ma, Q.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Li, X. C-reactive protein correlates with computed tomographic findings and predicts severe COVID-19 early. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mousavi-Nasab, S.D.; Mardani, R.; Nasr Azadani, H.; Zali, F.; Ahmadi Vasmehjani, A.; Sabeti, S.; Alavi Darazam, I.; Ahmadi, N. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein level as prognostic markers in mild versus severe COVID-19 patients. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed. Bench. 2020, 13, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, M.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y. A Retrospective Study of the C-Reactive Protein to Lymphocyte Ratio and Disease Severity in 108 Patients with Early COVID-19 Pneumonia from January to March 2020 in Wuhan, China. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e926393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Li, H.; Song, C.; Lu, R.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, F.; Han, D.; Chen, L.; Pan, P.; Dai, M. Early Prediction of Disease Progression in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Using C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio. Dis. Markers 2021, 2021, 6304189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Smilowitz, N.R.; Kunichoff, D.; Garshick, M.; Shah, B.; Pillinger, M.; Hochman, J.S.; Berger, J.S. C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 2270–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stringer, D.; Braude, P.; Myint, P.K.; Evans, L.; Collins, J.T.; Verduri, A.; Quinn, T.J.; Vilches-Moraga, A.; Stechman, M.J.; Pearce, L.; et al. The role of C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in COVID-19. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 50, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Turan, O.; Mirici, A.; Duru Akçalı, S.; Turan, P.A.; Batum, Ö.; Şengül, A.; Ekici Ünsal, Z.; Işık Kabakoğlu, N.; Ogan, N.; Torun, Ş.; et al. Characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and parameters associated with severe pneumonia. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75, e14786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guan, X.; Zhang, B.; Fu, M.; Li, M.; Yuan, X.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, J.; Guo, H.; Lu, Y. Clinical and inflammatory features based machine learning model for fatal risk prediction of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Results from a retrospective cohort study. Ann. Med. 2021, 53, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vincent, J.L.; Taccone, F.S. Understanding pathways to death in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 430–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Inchingolo, A.D.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Bordea, I.R.; Malcangi, G.; Xhajanka, E.; Scarano, A.; Lorusso, F.; Farronato, M.; Tartaglia, G.M.; Isacco, C.G.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Disease through Viral Genomic and Receptor Implications: An Overview of Diagnostic and Immunology Breakthroughs. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scialo, F.; Daniele, A.; Amato, F.; Pastore, L.; Matera, M.G.; Cazzola, M.; Castaldo, G.; Bianco, A. ACE2: The Major Cell Entry Receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Lung 2020, 198, 867–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Signore, A.; Lauri, C.; Colandrea, M.; Di Girolamo, M.; Chiodo, E.; Grana, C.M.; Campagna, G.; Aceti, A. Lymphopenia in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection is caused by margination of lymphocytes in large bowel: An [18F] FDG PET/CT study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 3419–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ashrafi, F.; Nematollahi, P.; Salmasi, M.; Hedayat, A.; Amra, B. Association of lymphocyte subsets with mortality in severe COVID-19 pneumonia patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2021, 35, e24046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Berthelot, J.M.; Lioté, F.; Maugars, Y.; Sibilia, J. Lymphocyte Changes in Severe COVID-19: Delayed Over-Activation of STING? Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 607069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cantenys-Molina, S.; Fernández-Cruz, E.; Francos, P.; de Quirós, J.C.L.B.; Muñoz, P.; Gil-Herrera, J. Lymphocyte subsets early predict mortality in a large series of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Spain. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2021, 203, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, C.; Hu, X.; Xue, Q.; Chen, L. Reduced Counts of Various Subsets of Peripheral Blood T Lymphocytes in Patients with Severe Course of COVID-19. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2022, 172, 721–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Iannetta, M.; Buccisano, F.; Fraboni, D.; Malagnino, V.; Campogiani, L.; Teti, E.; Spalliera, I.; Rossi, B.; Di Lorenzo, A.; Palmieri, R.; et al. Baseline T-lymphocyte subset absolute counts can predict both outcome and severity in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: A single center study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Balzanelli, M.G.; Distratis, P.; Dipalma, G.; Vimercati, L.; Catucci, O.; Amatulli, F.; Cefalo, A.; Lazzaro, R.; Palazzo, D.; Aityan, S.K.; et al. Immunity Profiling of COVID-19 Infection, Dynamic Variations of Lymphocyte Subsets, a Comparative Analysis on Four Different Groups. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. de Oliveira, D.C.; Spiri, B.S.; Schluga, Y.C.; Justus, J.L.P.; Neto, F.D.N.L.; de Azambuja, A.P. Evaluation of lymphocyte count, T-cell subsets and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as early predictors for severity and outcome of COVID-19 disease-a report from a highly complex hospital in Brazil. Hematol. Transfus. Cell Ther. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
  39. Montiel-Cervantes, L.A.; Medina, G.; Pilar Cruz-Domínguez, M.; Pérez-Tapia, S.M.; Jiménez-Martínez, M.C.; Arrieta-Oliva, H.I.; Carballo-Uicab, G.; López-Pelcastre, L.; Camacho-Sandoval, R. Poor Survival in COVID-19 Associated with Lymphopenia and Higher Neutrophile-Lymphocyte Ratio. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2021, 23, 153–159. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, M.; Guo, W.; Dong, Y.; Wang, X.; Dai, D.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, H.; et al. Elevated Exhaustion Levels of NK and CD8+ T Cells as Indicators for Progression and Prognosis of COVID-19 Disease. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 580237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yuan, S.; Jiang, S.C.; Zhang, Z.W.; Fu, Y.F.; Hu, J.; Li, Z.L. Quantification of Cytokine Storms During Virus Infections. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 659419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Balzanelli, M.G.; Distratis, P.; Lazzaro, R.; Cefalo, A.; Catucci, O.; Aityan, S.K.; Dipalma, G.; Vimercati, L.; Inchingolo, A.D.; Maggiore, M.E.; et al. The Vitamin D, IL-6 and the eGFR Markers a Possible Way to Elucidate the Lung–Heart–Kidney Cross-Talk in COVID-19 Disease: A Foregone Conclusion. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dhar, S.K.; Damodar, S.; Gujar, S.; Das, M. IL-6 and IL-10 as predictors of disease severity in COVID-19 patients: Results from meta-analysis and regression. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mulla, S.; Molla, M.M.A.; Ahmed, S.M.A.; Akhtaruzzaman, A.K.M.; Saleh, A.A.; Anwar, S. Association of interferon gamma inducible protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha, interleukin-6, and rs12252 single nucleotide polymorphism of interferon-induced transmembrane protein-3 gene with the severity of COVID-19 infection. Egypt J. Intern. Med. 2022, 34, 53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Ergoren, M.C.; Paolacci, S.; Manara, E.; Dautaj, A.; Dhuli, K.; Anpilogov, K.; Camilleri, G.; Suer, H.K.; Sayan, M.; Tuncel, G.; et al. A pilot study on the preventative potential of alpha-cyclodextrin and hydroxytyrosol against SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, e2020022. [Google Scholar]
  46. Balzanelli, M.G.; Distratis, P.; Aityan, S.K.; Amatulli, F.; Catucci, O.; Cefalo, A.; De Michele, A.; Dipalma, G.; Inchingolo, F.; Lazzaro, R.; et al. An Alternative “Trojan Horse” Hypothesis for COVID-19: Immune Deficiency of IL-10 and SARS-CoV-2 Biology. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2022, 22, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hirano, T. IL-6 in inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer. Int. Immunol. 2021, 33, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Basheer, M.; Saad, E.; Kananeh, M.; Asad, L.; Khayat, O.; Badarne, A.; Abdo, Z.; Arraf, N.; Milhem, F.; Bassal, T.; et al. Cytokine Patterns in COVID-19 Patients: Which Cytokines Predict Mortality and Which Protect Against? Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 4735–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Medeiros, T.; Guimarães, G.M.C.; Carvalho, F.R.; Alves, L.S.; Faustino, R.; Campi-Azevedo, A.C.; Peruhype-Magalhães, V.; Teixeira-Carvalho, A.; de Souza Gomes, M.; do Amaral, L.R.; et al. Acute kidney injury associated to COVID-19 leads to a strong unbalance of circulant immune mediators. Cytokine 2022, 157, 155974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Huybrechts, K.F.; Desai, R.J.; Cohen, J.M.; Mogun, H.; Pennell, P.B.; Bateman, B.T.; Patorno, E. Topiramate use early in pregnancy and the risk of oral clefts: A pregnancy cohort study. Neurology 2018, 90, e342–e351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kokkoris, S.; Stamataki, E.; Emmanouil, G.; Psachoulia, C.; Ntaidou, T.; Maragouti, A.; Kanavou, A.; Malachias, S.; Christodouli, F.; Papachatzakis, I.; et al. Serum inflammatory and brain injury biomarkers in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit: A pilot study. eNeurologicalSci 2022, 29, 100434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nguyen, N.; Nguyen, H.; Ukoha, C.; Hoang, L.; Patel, C.; Ikram, F.G.; Acharya, P.; Dhillon, A.; Sidhu, M. Relation of interleukin-6 levels in COVID-19 patients with major adverse cardiac events. Proc. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. 2022, 35, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Halmaciu, I.; Arbănași, E.M.; Kaller, R.; Mureșan, A.V.; Arbănași, E.M.; Bacalbasa, N.; Suciu, B.A.; Cojocaru, I.I.; Runcan, A.I.; Grosu, F.; et al. Chest CT Severity Score and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of the Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and of COVID-19 Patients’ Mortality. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Luo, X.; Zhou, W.; Yan, X.; Guo, T.; Wang, B.; Xia, H.; Ye, L.; Xiong, J.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Coronavirus 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2174–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chapanduka, Z.C.; Abdullah, I.; Allwood, B.; Koegelenberg, C.F.; Irusen, E.; Lalla, U.; Zemlin, A.E.; Masha, T.E.; Erasmus, R.T.; Jalavu, T.P.; et al. Haematological predictors of poor outcome among COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in South Africa. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0275832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yousfi, N.; Fathallah, I.; Attoini, A.; Jones, M.; Henchir, M.; Ben Hassine, Z.; Kouraichi, N.; Ben Salah, N. Prognostic Value of Routine Blood Parameters in Intensive Care Unit COVID-19 Patients. EJIFCC 2022, 33, 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  57. Peralta-Amaro, A.L.; Pecero-García, E.I.; Valadez-Calderón, J.G.; Ramírez-Ventura, J.C.; Coria-Moctezuma, L.A.; Hernández-Utrera, J.E. Low testosterone levels as an independent risk factor for mortality in male patients with COVID-19: Report of a Single-Center Cohort Study in Mexico. Rev. Int. Androl. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen, T.; Dai, Z.; Mo, P.; Li, X.; Ma, Z.; Song, S.; Chen, X.; Luo, M.; Liang, K.; Gao, S.; et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective Study. Newman A, editor. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2020, 75, 1788–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Heubner, L.; Petrick, P.L.; Güldner, A.; Bartels, L.; Ragaller, M.; Mirus, M.; Rand, A.; Tiebel, O.; Beyer-Westendorf, J.; Rößler, M.; et al. Extreme obesity is a strong predictor for in-hospital mortality and the prevalence of long-COVID in severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vimercati, L.; De Maria, L.; Quarato, M.; Caputi, A.; Gesualdo, L.; Migliore, G.; Cavone, D.; Sponselli, S.; Pipoli, A.; Inchingolo, F.; et al. Association between Long COVID and Overweight/Obesity. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nader, M.; Zmerli, O.; Platt, D.E.; Hamdan, H.; Hamdash, S.; Tayeh, R.A.; Azar, J.; Kadi, D.; Sultan, Y.; Bazarbachi, T.; et al. Observational study of factors associated with morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in Lebanon, 2020-2021. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0275101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kurian, N.M.; BYadav, S.C.; Gurjar, M.; Mishra, P.; Sanjeev, O.P.; Azim, A.; Gupta, D.; Hashim, Z.; Verma, A.; Bhatia, E.; et al. Association of hyperglycaemia at-admission & diabetes mellitus with 28 day mortality in patients admitted with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective study. Indian J. Med. Res. 2022, 155, 554–564. [Google Scholar]
  63. Caira-Chuquineyra, B.; Fernandez-Guzman, D.; Alvarez-Arias, P.M.; Zarate-Curi, Á.A.; Herrera-Añazco, P.; Benites-Zapata, V.A. Association between prehospital medication and fatal outcomes in a cohort of hospitalized patients due to coronavirus disease-2019 in a referral hospital in Peru. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 50, 102472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Life 13 00322 g001 550
Figure 1. ROC curve of T lymphocyte subsets.
Figure 1. ROC curve of T lymphocyte subsets.
Life 13 00322 g001
Life 13 00322 g002 550
Figure 2. ROC curves of age, IL-6, LDH and number of comorbidities [AUC: area under the ROC curve].
Figure 2. ROC curves of age, IL-6, LDH and number of comorbidities [AUC: area under the ROC curve].
Life 13 00322 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 150 enrolled patients with COVID-19. Values are reported as median (IQR) or number of patients (rate%), as appropriate.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 150 enrolled patients with COVID-19. Values are reported as median (IQR) or number of patients (rate%), as appropriate.
CharacteristicPatients
(n = 150)		Survivors
(n = 100)		Non-Survivors
(n = 50)		p-Values
Age (years)70 (62–80)65 (57–73)79 (73–85)<0.0001
Males79 (52.7%)64 (55.25–69.75)78 (69–83)<0.0001
Females71 (47.3%)68 (57.25–77.5)83 (74–85)<0.0001
Days from clinical onset7 (7–10)7 (3–20)7 (2–30)0.994
Males7 (7–10)7 (7–10.75)7 (7–10)0.310
Females7 (7–10)7 (7–10)7 (7–10)0.392
Table
Table 2. Comorbidities of 150 enrolled patients with COVID-19. Values are reported as number of patients (rate%).
Table 2. Comorbidities of 150 enrolled patients with COVID-19. Values are reported as number of patients (rate%).
ComorbiditiesPatients
(n = 150)
Hypertension83 (55.3%)
Obesity53 (35.3%)
Diabetes36 (24%)
Chronic cardiac disease34 (22.6%)
Chronic neurological disorders24 (16%)
Chronic pulmonary disease12 (8%)
Chronic kidney disease11 (7.3%)
Malignancies7 (4.6%)
Autoimmune disorders6 (4%)
HIV0
Table
Table 3. Medical treatment of 150 enrolled patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Values are reported as median (IQR) or number of patients (rate%), as appropriate.
Table 3. Medical treatment of 150 enrolled patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Values are reported as median (IQR) or number of patients (rate%), as appropriate.
TreatmentsPatients
(n = 150)
Antiviral therapy
Remdesivir, No (%)19 (12)
Immune therapy
Hyperimmune plasma, No (%)9 (6)
CTS therapy
Prednisone or equivalent > 1.5 mg/kg/day148 (98)
ICU admission, No (%)34 (22)
Length of hospital, days, median (range)13 (1–87)
Table
Table 4. Laboratory data of SARS-CoV-2 patients on admission in the survivors and non-survivors groups and survival correlation [CRP: C-reactive protein, Hb: haemoglobin, IL-6: interleukin-6, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, PCT: procalcitonin; PLT: platelets, WBC: white blood cells].
Table 4. Laboratory data of SARS-CoV-2 patients on admission in the survivors and non-survivors groups and survival correlation [CRP: C-reactive protein, Hb: haemoglobin, IL-6: interleukin-6, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, PCT: procalcitonin; PLT: platelets, WBC: white blood cells].
Blood CountPatients
(n = 150)		Survivors
(n = 100)		Non-Survivors
(n = 50)		p-Values
WBC (×103/µL)8 (6–11)7.8 (5.5–10)8.2 (5.7–11)0.3957
Lymphocytes (×103/µL)0.9 (0.6–1.3)1.0 (0.70–1.4)0.70 (0.50–0.90)<0.0001
Monocytes (×103/µL)0.5 (0.3–0.6)0.50 (0.30–0.60)0.45 (0.30–0.60)0.7255
Neutrophil (×103/µL)6.2 (1–23.1)6.0 (3.8–8.4)6.7 (4.9–9.9)0.1263
CD3 (cells/µL)443 (281–707)556 (358–836)304 (194–491)<0.000 1
CD4 (cells/µL)272 (174–445)353 (207–548)184 (113–272)<0.0001
CD8 (cells/µL)135 (77–228)172 (97–265)83 (49–139)<0.0001
CD4/CD8 ratio1.98 (1.4–3.2)1.97 (1.53–2.98)2.00 (1.15–3.98)0.9539
Hb (g/dL)13.4 (12–14)14(12–15)13 (11–14)0.0535
PLT (×103/µL)236 (179–310)254 (197–318)200 (160–258)0.0013
Inflammation-Related BiomarkersPatients
(n = 150)		Survivors
(n = 100)		Non-Survivors
(n = 50)		p-Values
D-Dimers (ng/mL)1118 (696–2160)1041 (652–1692)1490 (997–3604)0.0114
Ferritin (ng/mL)738 (407–1293)655 (349–1013)1111 (618–1561)0.0018
Fibrinogen (g/L)533 (418–643)523 (406–633)544 (453–678)0.4193
IL-6 (pg/mL)13 (2–28)9 (3–19)20 (11–57)<0.0001
LDH (U/L)357 (272–464)318 (257–398)489 (359–557)<0.0001
CRP (mg/L)67 (26–124)51 (16–80)128 (68–170)<0.0001
PCT (ng/mL)0.08 (0.03–0.23)0.05 (0.02–0.12)0.21 (0.10–0.51)<0.0001
Table
Table 5. Variables independently associated with survival (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals).
Table 5. Variables independently associated with survival (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals).
VariablesOdds Ratio95% CIp-Value
Age1.141.07 to 1.220.0001
Number of comorbidities1.841.11 to 3.050.0178
Variables not included in the model
D-Dimers, Ferritin, Fibrinogen, CRP, PCT, IL-6, LDH
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fuzio, D.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Ruggieri, V.; Fasano, M.; Federico, M.; Mandorino, M.; Dirienzo, L.; Scacco, S.; Rizzello, A.; Delvecchio, M.; et al. Inflammation as Prognostic Hallmark of Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Life 2023, 13, 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020322

AMA Style

Fuzio D, Inchingolo AM, Ruggieri V, Fasano M, Federico M, Mandorino M, Dirienzo L, Scacco S, Rizzello A, Delvecchio M, et al. Inflammation as Prognostic Hallmark of Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Life. 2023; 13(2):322. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020322

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fuzio, Diana, Angelo Michele Inchingolo, Vitalba Ruggieri, Massimo Fasano, Maria Federico, Manuela Mandorino, Lavinia Dirienzo, Salvatore Scacco, Alessandro Rizzello, Maurizio Delvecchio, and et al. 2023. "Inflammation as Prognostic Hallmark of Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection" Life 13, no. 2: 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020322

APA Style

Fuzio, D., Inchingolo, A. M., Ruggieri, V., Fasano, M., Federico, M., Mandorino, M., Dirienzo, L., Scacco, S., Rizzello, A., Delvecchio, M., Parise, M., Rana, R., Faccilongo, N., Rapone, B., Inchingolo, F., Mancini, A., Fatone, M. C., Gnoni, A., Dipalma, G., & Dirienzo, G. (2023). Inflammation as Prognostic Hallmark of Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Life, 13(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020322

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop