Next Article in Journal
A Retrospective Observational Study of Quality of Life in a Northern Greece Population of People with Haemophilia
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional and Psychosocial Impact of Food Allergy in Pediatric Age
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 14
Issue 6
10.3390/life14060696
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical–Pathological Features of Thyroid Neoplasms in Young Patients Diagnosed in a Single Center

by
Aura Jurescu
1,
Dan Brebu
2,
Alexandra Corina Faur
3,*,
Octavia Vita
1,
Robert Barna
1,
Adrian Vaduva
1,4,
Oana Popa
5,
Anca Muresan
1,4,
Mihaela Iacob
4,
Marioara Cornianu
1,4 and
Remus Cornea
1,4
1
Department of Microscopic Morphology-Morphopatology, ANAPATMOL Research Center, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
2
Researching Future Chirurgie 2, Department of Surgery II, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
3
Department of Anatomy and Embriology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
4
Department of Pathology, “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
5
Department of Endocrinology, Centre of Molecular Research in Nephrology and Vascular Disease, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2024, 14(6), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060696
Submission received: 19 April 2024 / Revised: 26 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 28 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical–pathological profile in young patients with thyroid cancer. Materials and methods: We realized a retrospective study on patients with thyroid neoplasms who underwent surgery at the “Pius Brinzeu” County Clinical Emergency Hospital in Timisoara, Romania. A comparative analysis of some parameters between two groups, young patients (<45 years) versus patients ≥45 years, was performed. Results: A total of 211 patients met the study inclusion criteria, mostly females (86.26%) with a female/male ratio of 6.81:1. In patients <45 years old (25.64%), papillary thyroid carcinoma was identified in 51.85% of cases; in 53.85% of cases, the tumor was >1 cm; 13.46% had extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.0430); 21.15% capsule invasion (p = 0.1756); 23.08% lympho-vascular invasion (p = 0.0048); and 13.46% of cases locoregional nodal invasion (p = 0.0092). Conclusions: Thyroid cancer in young people was associated with chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and tumor progression parameters, identifying more cases of extrathyroidal extension, locoregional nodal invasion, lympho-vascular invasion and perineural invasion in young patients compared to older ones. For a better understanding of this pathology and to improve diagnosis and therapeutic management, more studies are needed for these patients.

1. Introduction

Globally, in 2022, thyroid cancer accounted for 4.1% of human neoplasms, and the mortality rate was 0.5% [1]. During the last few years, the incidence of thyroid neoplasms has increased significantly, especially in young people [2], with 13% of tumors diagnosed in patients in their first decades of life being malignant thyroid tumors [3]. This increase in the incidence was mainly due to the improvement of detection methods by ultrasonography and other diagnostic techniques [4]. Although most patients with thyroid cancer have a favorable prognosis, and mortality remains relatively unchanged, it can strongly affect the quality of their lives [3,4]. In individuals aged 50 and above, thyroid neoplasms are often detected as an incidental finding, with treatment potentially posing greater risks than benefits [4]. However, the younger patients, often affected by more aggressive types of thyroid cancer, require better diagnosis and treatment options without any delay [3,4].
Thyroid neoplasms represent a heterogeneous group of tumors, with the most frequently encountered tumor subtype being papillary carcinoma (PTC), a well-differentiated tumor with a generally favorable prognosis. However, worse forms of thyroid cancer exist, such as anaplastic carcinoma (ATC); despite the low incidence, its mortality rate is very high. Moreover, even inside the same tumor, there can be heterogeneity, or more histological variants can be present simultaneously in the same patient, making therapeutic management very difficult [2]. Identifying the histopathological type of thyroid cancer guides the treatment and is relevant in assessing the prognosis for patients with thyroid tumors [3,4,5].
This paper aims to outline the social–demographical and clinical–pathological profiles of young patients with thyroid cancer and to assess several parameters in young patients, as compared with older patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

To achieve the proposed objectives, we conducted a retrospective study involving a cohort of patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer who underwent surgical resection and pathological examination at the “Pius Brinzeu” Emergency County Clinical Hospital Timisoara (PBECCHT). This study was carried out according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration of good medical clinical practice, and all participants signed informed consent for the use of their medical data for scientific purposes at the time of admission.
Data were retrieved from the Pathological Anatomy Service database of PBECCHT. We performed a computerized search of pathology reports for the word “thyroid” between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. We established the following inclusion criteria:
  • Consecutive cases of malignant thyroid tumors: papillary carcinomas (PTCs), follicular carcinomas (FTCs), poorly differentiated carcinomas (PDTCs), anaplastic carcinomas (ATCs), medullary carcinomas (MTCs) and lymphomas; in addition, cases of well-differentiated thyroid tumors with uncertain malignant potential (UMP), confirmed by histopathological examination, were also included in the study.
The exclusion criteria were as follows:
  • Nonneoplastic, inflammatory thyroid conditions;
  • Benign thyroid tumors.

2.2. Data Sources and Variables of Interest

All data were obtained by analyzing the medical records of the patients, the accompanying sheets of the biopsy material and the pathological reports. Pathological diagnosis was established after standard histopathological processing of the surgical resection specimens/tissue fragments: 10% buffered formalin fixation, followed by paraffin embedding. From paraffin blocks, 4 μm thick sections were stained with the usual hematoxylin–eosin stain (HE). For difficult cases, new sections were cut from the paraffin blocks at 4 μm thickness, and additional immunohistochemical (IHC) stains were performed: TTF1, HBME-1, CD56, CK, Ki 67, p53, LCA, p63 or calcitonin. Immunoreactions were visualized with the polymer system, using DAB (diaminobenzidine) chromogen and hematoxylin counterstain, according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.3. Compiling the Database

The following sociodemographic parameters were recorded for each patient: age and sex of the patients; living environment; and clinical–morphological parameters, i.e., type of resected specimen (total/partial thyroidectomies, right/left lobectomy, excision biopsy), tumor size, histological subtype of tumors (according to the World Health Organization (WHO)’s Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs) [6], local extension of the tumor at the time of diagnosis (pT), capsular invasion, perineural invasion (Pn) and lympho-vascular invasion (L-VI), status of regional lymph nodes (pN) and associated pathology, as well as the IHC markers used. The staging of thyroid neoplasms was performed according to the TNM (Tumor, Node, and Metastasis) system developed by the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) [7], as follows:
  • Primary tumor (pT):
    −
    pTX—primary tumor cannot be assessed;
    −
    pT0—no evidence of primary tumor;
    −
    pTI—tumor ≤2 cm in greatest dimension, limited to thyroid gland (pT1a—tumor ≤1 cm, pTIb—tumor >1 cm but ≤2 cm);
    −
    pT2—tumor >2 cm but ≤4 cm limited to the thyroid;
    −
    pT3: pT3a—tumor >4 cm limited to the thyroid, or pT3b—tumor of any size with gross extrathyroidal extension invading only strap muscles (sternohyoid, sternothyroid. thyrohyoid or omohyoid muscles);
    −
    pT4: pT4a—tumor of any size with gross extrathyroidal extension invading subcutaneous soft tissues, larynx, trachea, esophagus, or recurrent laryngeal nerve, or pT4b—tumor of any size with gross extrathyroidal extension invading prevertebral fascia or enclosing the carotid or mediastinal artery vessels.
  • Regional Lymph Node (pN):
    −
    pNX—regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed;
    −
    pN0—no evidence of locoregional lymph node metastasis;
    −
    pN1: pN1a—metastasis to pretracheal, paratracheal, or prelaryngeal, or upper mediastinal lymph nodes; or pN1b—metastasis to unilateral, bilateral, or contralateral lateral neck lymph nodes or retropharyngeal lymph nodes.
For the comparative analysis of the parameters in young patients versus elderly patients, we used the age of 45 as a limit, and the study group was divided into two groups, depending on this threshold. We chose this cutoff of 45 years because it has been included in the thyroid cancer staging system since 1983, starting with the second edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [7], and the age of 45 is the age average of patients in most studies.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and GraphPad Prism software, v8.2 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). For comparing the results between the two groups, the Fisher test, Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used. The results were considered statistically significant at values of p < 0.05.

3. Results

A total of 211 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The demographic, clinical and pathological data of the patients included in the two groups, analyzed comparatively, are presented in Table 1.

3.1. Patients’ Age and Sex

Of the total number of cases (211 patients with thyroid tumors) included in the study, 29 were males (13.74%) and 182 were females (86.26%), with an average age at the time of diagnosis of 53.91 years (between 15 and 82 years old). Most cases were identified in the 60–69 age group (53 cases; 25.12%) (Figure 1). In total, 52 patients (25.64%) were young adults aged <45 years, and 159 (75.36%) were adults aged ≥45 years, with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.0001).
Most thyroid tumors were diagnosed in females, representing 80.77% (42/52 cases) of the first group and 88.05% (140/159) of the second group, without statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.244). The female/male ratio was 6.81:1 for the entire lot of patients, 5.5:1 for group I and 7.3:1 for group II.

3.2. Living Environment of Patients

Among the patients aged <45 years, 56.86% (29/51) came from the urban environment; 43.14% (22/51) from rural areas; and in 1 case, the place of origin was not specified. From the group of patients aged ≥45 years, 64.33% (101/157) were from urban areas; 35.67% (56/157) were from rural places; and for 2 patients, the living environment was not specified (p = 0.4055). At the moment of diagnosis, the average age of patients with thyroid carcinoma was 51.35 years old for those from rural areas versus 55.44 years old for patients who came from an urban environment.

3.3. Method of Diagnosis and Association with Other Pathologies

A majority of cases (186/211, 88.15%) were diagnosed from total thyroidectomy specimens. In 11 cases (5.21%), a right lobectomy was performed, while in 12 cases (5.69%), a left lobectomy was conducted. Additionally, an excisional biopsy was performed in two cases (0.95%). In patients under 45 years old, malignant tumors were diagnosed on total thyroidectomy specimens in 40 cases (76.92%) and on lobectomy specimens in 12 cases (23.08%). In contrast, patients aged 45 years and older underwent a total thyroidectomy in 146 cases (91.82%), lobectomy in 11 cases (6.92%), and tumor fragment sampling in 2 cases (1.26%). The differences between the two age groups were statistically significant (p = 0.0058).
A large part of the patients included in the study presented other thyroid lesions associated with the cancer (Table 1). In young patients, the most common pathology associated with the malignant tumor was chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (18 cases, 32.73%), followed by primary thyroid follicular nodular disease (FND) (15 cases, 27.27%) and Graves–Basedow disease (4 cases, 7.27%). In elderly patients, malignant tumors appeared more frequently on the background of FND (98 cases, 54.75%); other associated thyroid lesions were chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (42 cases, 23.46%), follicular adenoma (13 cases, 7.27%) and Graves–Basedow disease (5 cases, 2.79%), with statistically significant differences (p = 0.0004) between the two groups (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

3.4. Histopathological Types

In patients <45 years old, the most common histological type was papillary carcinoma (PTC) diagnosed in 28 cases (51.85%)—Figure 4A and Figure 5B; followed by papillary microcarcinoma (18 cases; 33.33%), well-differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential (WDT-UMP) in 5 cases (9.26%) and follicular carcinoma (FTC) identified in 3 cases (5.56%)—Figure 4C. In patients ≥45 years old, the following were identified: papillary microcarcinoma in 87 cases (50.88%); PTC in 56 cases (32.75%); UMP in 11 cases (6.43%), FTC in 8 cases (4.68%); medullary carcinoma (MTC) in 3 cases (1.75%, Figure 4D); anaplastic carcinoma (ATC), with 1 case of poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDTC), “insular” type, in 5 cases (2.92%, Figure 4E); and 1 case (0.58%) of thyroid follicular lymphoma, without statistically significant differences regarding the distribution of histological types of tumors between the two age groups (p = 0.1211). Histologically different thyroid tumors were diagnosed at the same time in 3 cases from group I and in 12 cases from group II. Papillary microcarcinomas were most frequently observed together with other histological variants, such as PTC, UMP, MTC or ATC. The microscopic images were obtained from the slides corresponding to the cases analyzed in this study.
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC, follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; PDTC, poorly differentiated carcinoma.

3.5. Tumor Extension, Lympho-Vascular Invasion and Perineural Tumor Invasion

Most tumors (70%) involved a single thyroid lobe (RTL). A total of 7/52 cases (13.46%) showed microscopic extrathyroidal tumor extension in patients <45 years and 6/159 cases (3.82%) in patients ≥45 years of age, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.0430).
Capsular involvement was identified in 11/52 (21.15%) cases from the first group and 20/157 (12.74%) cases from the second group (p = 0.1756), and lympho-vascular invasion was identified in 12/52 (23.08%) cases from the first group and 12/157 (7.64%) from the second group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.0048) (Figure 4C and Figure 5A,B). In two cases of ATC diagnosed upon excisional biopsy, tumor extension at the time of diagnosis and capsular and lympho-vascular invasion could not be specified.
After analyzing the relationship between L-VI and tumor extension at diagnosis, capsular invasion and L-VI were correlated in both groups (p < 0.0001), 75% (9/12) of cases with L-VI presented capsule invasion in group I, and 67% (8/12) of cases in group II (Table 2). Also, L-VI and extrathyroidal tumor extension were correlated, with L-VI being absent in 97% (39/40) of the cases that did not present extrathyroidal tumor extension in group I (p < 0.0003), and in 99% (144/145) from cases in group II (p < 0.0001) (Table 3).
Perineural tumor invasion (Pn) was reported in 7 cases: 1/52 (1.92%) from group I and 6/157 (3.82%) cases from group II. We observed that, in the presence of Pn, capsular invasion (p = 0.0009) and L-VI (p = 0.0038) were more frequently encountered, with statistically significant differences. We also found an association between tumor extension and Pn (p = 0.0368) (Table 4).

3.6. TNM Staging

Regarding the pT parameter, 104 patients presented pT1a tumors: 17 (32.69%) from group I and 87 (54.72%) from group II. In 46 cases—15 (28.85%) from group I and 31 (19.15%) from group II—the tumors were classified as pT1b. Stage pT2 was assigned to 19 tumors: 5 (9.62%) from group I and 14 (8.81%) from group II. In 12 cases—5 (9.62%) from group I and 7 (4.40%) from group II—the tumors were staged as pT3a. A total of 8 cases—3 (5.77%) from group I and 5 (3.14%) from group II—presented tumors pT3b. Only one case in group II (0.63%) was assigned to stage pT4a, and none was assigned to stage pT4b. The comparative analysis of the two studied groups did not reveal any correlation (p = 0.1615). In 21 (9.95%) cases, the pT parameter could not be evaluated.
Our assessment of the pN parameter showed that 12 patients—7 (13.46%) from the first group and 5 (3.14%) in the second group—presented lymph node metastases (pN1). In group I, four cases were pN1a, and three cases were pN1b, as compared with group II, with three cases being pN1a and none being case pN1b. Regarding MTC, one case was classified as Nx, and the other two were staged as pN1. Lymph node involvement was more frequently reported in young patients (p = 0.0092).
Only one patient was known to have metastasis, located at the level of the T12 thoracic vertebra, thus belonging in the pM1 stage.

4. Discussion

According to the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors, thyroid cancer represents an entity that includes a wide range of histological aspects and molecular and genetic characteristics [6,8,9]. The global incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing [10,11], with the people most affected being females, with a female/male ratio of 2.97:1 [12], and with a higher rate of diagnosed tumors in developed countries [3,13,14]. Regarding tumor pathology in young patients, thyroid cancer ranks second after breast cancer [15], but it is the most common thyroid malignancy in the pediatric population [16,17].

4.1. Patients’ Age, Sex and Living Environment

For patients with thyroid cancer, the age at initial diagnosis is considered a prognostic factor in TNM staging [18], with mortality being progressively higher with advancing age, especially after the age of 35–40 years [7]. Thyroid cancer can occur at any age, but the average age at diagnosis is 50 years old, and the highest frequency is observed between 45 and 54 years of age [5]. According to Kitahara et al., the incidence of thyroid cancer peaks around the age of 55 years in females and 65 in men, and then it decreases with advancing age [19]. In our study, the average age at diagnosis was 54 years old, and the maximum incidence was found in the 60–69 age group; these results are similar to the results from Nguyen et al.’s study, which recorded an average age of 50 years old at diagnosis [5]. In several studies, thyroid cancer has been observed to have a higher incidence in patients aged ≥45 years [20,21]. Similar to the literature data, in our study, thyroid cancer cases were more frequent in patients aged ≥45 years (75.36%, p< 0.0001). In this study, we chose the age limit of 45 years for the following reasons: the purpose of the study was to outline the profile of young patients (under 45 years), the age of 45 years is the average age of patients in several studies and because this cutoff of 45 years was considered a prognostic factor starting with the second edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [7]. Moreover, the age <45 years was related to the increased risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [22,23]. Establishing the threshold limit for the age at diagnosis has been the subject of research in numerous studies. In most staging systems, age 45 is used to differentiate low-risk thyroid cancer from high-risk thyroid cancer [7,20]. However, recent studies have shown that age is insufficient in predicting the prognosis for patients with thyroid cancer [18]. There is also an argument that a binary variable for age may not be appropriate and that a staging system using age as a continuous variable could provide more prognostic information [18,24]. The mortality due to the thyroid cancer increases progressively with age, but no single age cutoff has been reported that accurately stratifies patients into risk categories [7]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of the age threshold of 55 years would have a more important prognostic value [24,25,26,27]; therefore, the latest (i.e., eighth) edition of TNM introduced a change in age cutoff from 45 to 55 [7,28]. Nevertheless, current studies highlight that, due to the down-staging of patients with thyroid cancer when performing the TNM 8th edition classification, patients predisposed to recurrence may be overlooked, affecting therapeutic decisions at the time of disease diagnosis [29].
According to Nguyen et al., thyroid cancer is more common among females, with a female/male ratio of 3:1 [5]. In our study, the female/male ratio was 6.81:1, which is significantly higher compared to the ratio mentioned in the previous study. In females, the tumor was diagnosed more frequently between the ages of 15 and 49, while in males, between the ages of 50 and 69.
Regarding the patients’ environment, we found a higher incidence of thyroid neoplasms in the urban areas (about 40%). This result is comparable to that of Guay et al.’s result, which indicates at least a 25% higher incidence of these tumors in urban patients [21]. In our study, we observed differences in the average age at diagnosis. Specifically, patients from rural areas tend to develop thyroid carcinoma at a younger age on average, in contrast to patients from urban environments.

4.2. Associated Thyroid Pathology and Type of Surgical Intervention

Concerning the pathology associated with thyroid cancer, the incidence of malignancy in patients with thyroid follicular nodular disease (FND) is appreciable. According to some authors, the incidence of thyroid carcinoma associated with FND is between 8.6 and 13% [30]. Graves–Basedow disease has been associated with an increased risk of malignancy. Some authors report a more aggressive evolution of thyroid cancer in patients with hyperthyroidism [31]. Autoimmune/Hashimoto thyroiditis is considered to be a risk factor for the development of thyroid lymphomas (reported in 80% of cases) [32], but it was also diagnosed in 27.6% of cases with PTC [33]. In our study, we observed that FND, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, Graves–Basedow disease and follicular adenoma were the most frequently associated lesions. Thyroid neoplasms were more often associated in group I with lesions of lymphocytic thyroiditis and in group II with FND; Graves-Basedow disease was identified more frequently in group I, and follicular adenoma in group II, with the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0004).
The identification of the tumor subtype has therapeutic implications. In PTC, the most common treatment is surgery—total thyroidectomy/lobectomy. Total thyroidectomy offers advantages such as the use of radioactive iodine as adjuvant therapy and allows for accurate postoperative surveillance of thyroglobulin levels; on the other hand, lobectomy decreases the risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent lesions of the laryngeal nerve [34]. However, it is not clear whether total thyroidectomy provides better overall survival or recurrence-free survival than lobectomy [20,35]. In our study, total thyroidectomies were performed in 88.15% of cases, in 23.08% of the patients from the first study group and in 6.92% of those in the second group, with the differences being statistically significant (p = 0.0058).

4.3. The Histological Subtype of Thyroid Cancer

PTC is the most common form of thyroid cancer, accounting for 80–85% of all cases, and has the best prognosis, especially in patients under 45 years of age [34]. Regarding the histological type, in our study, PTC was diagnosed in 86.30% of cases. Histopathological PTC presents a complex morphological aspect, with a series of variants being described as follows: classic variant, encapsulated, follicular variant, clear cell variant, microcarcinoma (diameter ≤ 1 cm), etc. Among the forms classified as aggressive are the variants with tall cells, columnar cells, “hobnail”, solid or diffuse, and sclerosing [9,17]. Aggressive forms have important clinical significance, poor prognosis and intermediate risk of recurrence, and their incidence appears to be increasing [9]. Moreover, within the same tumor, several variants can coexist; for example, the classic one is often accompanied by the follicular one. The simultaneous presence of two different histological variants may be important if one of them is more aggressive [2].
In total, 5.02% of our cases were represented by FTC. In the literature, FTC accounts for approximately 5–10% of thyroid malignancies in non-endemic goiter areas of the world [36]. This is the second most common histological form of differentiated thyroid cancer, with a worse prognosis compared with the PTC. Although the incidence of thyroid cancer has nearly tripled in the last decades, the incidence of FTC has remained relatively stable, even decreasing due to iodine supplementation in the general population’s diet [37]. In addition, changes in diagnostic criteria over time have made it difficult to analyze the epidemiology of this form of cancer, given that some FTCs have been reclassified as papillary carcinomas, the follicular variant (FVPTC) [38]. The histopathological examination is an extremely important tool for establishing the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The histopathological subtype of FTC cannot be diagnosed exclusively on cytological aspects. The identification of certain aspects, such as vascular and capsular invasion, is necessary for establishing a diagnosis of a malignant tumor [37]. According to the WHO, capsular invasion is defined as the complete crossing of the capsule by a part of the tumor, while vascular invasion is represented by the presence of malignant cells adhering to the vascular walls [38]. Thus, an examination of multiple sections of the lesion and the entire tumor capsule is necessary for diagnosis [38].
Anaplastic thyroid carcinomas (ATCs) are a rare class of malignant tumors, representing only 1–2% of thyroid carcinomas, but being responsible for 14–39% of the deaths caused by them [39]. The average survival after diagnosis is 5–6 months, and 2-year survival can be found in only 10–15% of cases [39]. Fortunately, the incidence is decreasing, especially due to the early detection of small tumors by ultrasonography, as well as the reduction in the incidence of endemic goiter by iodine supplementation (goiter being correlated with the occurrence of ATC) [39]. In our study, in patients <45 years old, we did not identify any case of thyroid tumor with a low degree of differentiation, and in patients ≥ 45 years old, we identified only five cases (2.36%), with four being ATC and one with features of PDTC. Our results are comparable with data from the literature showing that a small percentage of 2–15% of thyroid tumor cases are described as PDTC [40].
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare type of cancer, representing 2–4% of thyroid carcinomas, originating from parafollicular C cells [41]. In our study, similar to data from the literature, this type of tumor was diagnosed in 1.42% of cases. Histologically, this carcinoma is usually infiltrative, poorly delimited, and made up of cells arranged in nests (similar to some neuroendocrine tumors), within a fibrous stroma, sometimes containing amyloid (a pathognomonic aspect, with amyloid being a pre-procalcitonin deposit). However, sometimes, they show uncharacteristic histological features, such as the formation of pseudo papillae (mimicking PTC), or having follicular architecture. In these cases, IHC can make a difference; these cells are immunohistochemically positive for calcitonin, chromogranin A and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), markers which are also useful for postoperative monitoring [42].

4.4. Lympho-Vascular Invasion, Extrathyroidal Extension and Lymph Node Metastases

In our study, 23.08% of patients <45 years old presented with L-VI. Lympho-vascular invasion was strongly correlated with capsule infiltration (p < 0.0001), extrathyroidal extension (p < 0.0001) and Pn (p = 0.0038). Lympho-vascular invasion, including only lymphatic invasion, is associated with a risk of persistent/recurrent disease in PTC patients; thus, it could be included in risk stratification systems and could guide decision-making for these patients [43]. Moreover, we found a more pronounced tendency toward extrathyroidal extension among patients with perineural invasion, with the results being statistically significant (p = 0.0368). Other studies report correlations between L-VI and some clinical and pathological features, such as extrathyroidal extension, Pn and capsular infiltration [44]. According to our results, more cases of the extrathyroidal extension were identified in patients under 45 years of age. Thus, 13.46% of cases with extrathyroidal extension were recorded in group I, as compared to 3.82% in group II, with the results being statistically significant (p = 0.0430). Moreover, locoregional nodal invasion (pN1 stage) was more frequent in group I: among the cases in which nodule dissection was performed, 13.46% presented locoregional lymph node invasion, as compared to 3.14% in group II, the differences being statistically significant (p = 0.0092). The results of the study conducted by Bestepe et al. show that there is a tendency for extrathyroidal extension and nodal metastases to occur more frequently in patients under 39 years of age, but without reporting a statistically significant relevance [45]. In another study, Kaouache et al. concluded that there is a higher frequency of capsular invasion and lympho-nodal invasion in patients younger than 40 years of age [46]. According to Wang et al. lympho-vascular invasion, absences of tumor capsule and extrathyroidal extension have been reported as predictors of nodal disease [47]. However, the prognostic significance of regional lymph node metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer is still controversial (47). It is known that PTC patients with clinically apparent lateral lymph node metastases (pN1b) have an unfavorable prognosis [47,48]. In our study, all pN1b cases were diagnosed only in young patients. Some authors concluded that the aggressiveness of N1b carcinoma is also varied, depending on differences in the size, number and invasiveness of metastases [47,48].
Study limitation: Our study had several limitations, such as the absence of data on the treatment received by the patients or their evolution after surgery that would make it possible to correlate the obtained results with survival and would significantly improve our work. Unfortunately, at present, in Romania, we do not have the possibility to follow the evolution of patients, because patients from all over the country can present themselves at regional hospitals, and the lack of an up-to-date National Cancer Registry, which would make it possible to complete and uniformly report cases and of cancer types, does not allow for patient follow-up or for an accurate assessment of disease incidence, prevalence and mortality. Furthermore, our study is limited by the small number of patients diagnosed in a single hospital and the fact that the analysis was performed retrospectively.

5. Conclusions

In this study, thyroid cancer cases were diagnosed more frequently in patients aged 45 years and older. In young patients, thyroid cancer has been associated with lesions such as chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and parameters indicative of aspects of tumor progression, such as extrathyroidal extension, locoregional lymph node invasion, lympho-vascular invasion and perineural invasion. Our findings highlight the need to monitor the incidence of thyroid cancer in young adults to assess whether changes in screening practices are needed and to raise awareness among physicians of the increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in this patient group. Therefore, our study should be complemented by additional larger studies that outline the clinical–pathological profile of patients with thyroid neoplasms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J., D.B., M.C. and R.C.; methodology, A.J., O.V., M.C. and R.C.; software, A.J., R.B. and A.V.; validation, M.C., A.C.F. and R.C.; formal analysis, A.J., O.V., A.F, A.M., O.P. and M.I.; investigation, A.J., O.V., A.M., O.P., M.I. and M.C.; resources, D.B., M.I., O.P., A.V., A.M. and M.C.; data curation, A.J., D.B. and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J., D.B. and M.C.; writing—review and editing, O.V., R.B., R.C., A.C.F. and M.C.; visualization, R.B., A.C.F., O.V. and M.C.; supervision, R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was edited according to the ethical standards of the PBECCHT. The Ethics Committee of PBECCHT approved this study (No. 458/12.04.2024) and waived the requirements for informed consent, considering the retrospective study design and the use of anonymized patient data. At admission, each patient provided written informed consent regarding the usage of data for research and publication.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study and is included in patient’s hospital records. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the use of tissue material in scientific studies.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and can be provided if needed or requested by the reviewer.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara for their support in covering the costs of publication for this paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge the professionals from the Pathological Anatomy Service, “Pius Brinzeu” Emergency Clinical County University Hospital Timisoara, Romania, for their support in data acquisition. The contribution of all colleagues should be recognized.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chmielik, E.; Rusinek, D.; Oczko-Wojciechowska, M.; Jarzab, M.; Krajewska, J.; Czarniecka, A.; Jarzab, B. Heterogeneity of Thyroid Cancer. Pathobiology 2018, 85, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Massimino, M.; Evans, D.B.; Podda, M.; Spinelli, C.; Collini, P.; Pizzi, N.; Bleyer, A. Thyroid cancer in adolescents and young adults. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2018, 65, e27025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, M.; Maso, L.D.; Vaccarella, S. Global trends in thyroid cancer incidence and the impact of overdiagnosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 468–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nguyen, Q.T.; Lee, E.J.; Huang, M.G.; Park, Y.I.; Khullar, A.; Plodkowski, R.A. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with thyroid cancer. Am. Health Drug Benefits 2015, 8, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Lloyd, R.V.; Osamura, R.Y.; Kloppel, G.; Rosai, J. (Eds.) WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs, 4th ed.; IARC: Lyon, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Amin, M.B.; Edge, S.B.; Greene, F.L.; Byrd, D.R.; Brookland, R.K.; Washington, M.K.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Compton, C.C.; Hess, K.R.; Sullivan, D.C.; et al. (Eds.) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 873–903. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baloch, Z.W.; Asa, S.L.; Barletta, J.A.; Ghossein, R.A.; Juhlin, C.C.; Jung, C.K.; LiVolsi, V.A.; Papotti, M.G.; Sobrinho-Simões, M.; Tallini, G.; et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms. Endocr. Pathol. 2022, 33, 27–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bai, Y.; Kakudo, K.; Jung, C.K. Updates in the Pathologic Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms: A Review of the World Health Organization Classification. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 35, 696–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Deng, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, M.; Li, N.; Tian, T.; Wu, Y.; Xu, P.; Yang, S.; Zhai, Z.; Zhou, L.; et al. Global Burden of Thyroid Cancer From 1990 to 2017. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e208759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Data Version: Globocan 2022 (version 1.1). 8 February 2024. Available online: https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/cancers/32-thyroid-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2024).
  12. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Data Version: Globocan 2022 (version 1.1). 8 February 2024. Available online: https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2024).
  13. Pizzato, M.; Li, M.; Vignat, J.; Laversanne, M.; Singh, D.; La Vecchia, C.; Vaccarella, S. The epidemiological landscape of thyroid cancer worldwide: GLOBOCAN estimates for incidence and mortality rates in 2020. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022, 10, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gupta, S.; Harper, A.; Ruan, Y.; Barr, R.; Frazier, A.L.; Ferlay, J.; Steliarova-Foucher, E.; Fidler-Benaoudia, M.M. International Trends in the Incidence of Cancer among Adolescents and Young Adults. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2020, 112, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Araque, D.V.P.; Bleyer, A.; Brito, J.P. Thyroid cancer in adolescents and young adults. Futur. Oncol. 2017, 13, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Limaiem, F.; Rehman, A.; Anastasopoulou, C.; Mazzoni, T. Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Asa, S.L. The Current Histologic Classification of Thyroid Cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 48, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ganly, I.; Nixon, I.J.; Wang, L.Y.; Palmer, F.L.; Migliacci, J.C.; Aniss, A.; Sywak, M.; Eskander, A.E.; Freeman, J.L.; Campbell, M.J.; et al. Survival from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What Has Age Got to Do with It? Thyroid 2015, 25, 1106–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Kitahara, C.M.; Schneider, A.B. Epidemiology of Thyroid Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2022, 31, 1284–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Raffaelli, M.; Tempera, S.E.; Sessa, L.; Lombardi, C.P.; De Crea, C.; Bellantone, R. Total thyroidectomy versus thyroid lobectomy in the treatment of papillary carcinoma. Gland. Surg. 2020, 9, S18–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Guay, B.; Johnson-Obaseki, S.; McDonald, J.T.; Connell, C.; Corsten, M. Incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer by socioeconomic status and urban residence: Canada 1991–2006. Thyroid 2014, 24, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, K.; Wang, R.; Wang, G. Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Cai, H.; Zhuge, L.; Huang, Z.; Wang, S.; Shi, P.; Yan, D.; Niu, L.; Li, Z. Distinct risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer based on age stratification. BMC Surg. 2024, 24, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Thewjitcharoen, Y.; Chatchomchuan, W.; Karndumri, K.; Porramatikul, S.; Krittiyawong, S.; Wanothayaroj, E.; Butadej, S.; Nakasatien, S.; Veerasomboonsin, V.; Kanchanapituk, A.; et al. Impacts of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer in Thai patients. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Kim, S.-J.; Myong, J.P.; Suh, H.; Lee, K.E.; Youn, Y.-K. Optimal Cutoff Age for Predicting Mortality Associated with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  26. Hendrickson-Rebizant, J.; Sigvaldason, H.; Nason, R.; Pathak, K. Identifying the most appropriate age threshold for TNM stage grouping of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO) 2015, 41, 1028–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nixon, I.J.; Kuk, D.; Wreesmann, V.; Morris, L.; Palmer, F.L.; Ganly, I.; Patel, S.G.; Singh, B.; Tuttle, R.M.; Shaha, A.R.; et al. Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 23, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Brierley, J.D.; Gospodarowicz, M.K.; Wittekind, C. (Eds.) The TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 8th ed.; Wiley Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Manzardo, O.A.; Cellini, M.; Indirli, R.; Dolci, A.; Colombo, P.; Carrone, F.; Lavezzi, E.; Mantovani, G.; Mazziotti, G.; Arosio, M.; et al. TNM 8th edition in thyroid cancer staging: Is there an improvement in predicting recurrence? Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2020, 27, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yong, J.S.-E.; Loh, K.S.; Petersson, B.F.; Thong, M. Multinodular goiter: A study of malignancy risk in nondominant nodules. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017, 96, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Soares, M.N.; Borges-Canha, M.; Neves, C.; Neves, J.S.; Carvalho, D. The role of Graves’ disease in the development of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Eur. Thyroid. J. 2023, 12, e230055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Vita, O.; Dema, A.; Barna, R.; Cornea, R.; Brebu, D.; Vlad, M.; Popa, O.; Muntean, I.; Szilagyi, D.; Iacob, M.; et al. Primary Thyroid Lymphoma: A Retrospective-Observational Study in a Single Institutional Center. Medicina 2024, 60, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Noureldine, S.I.; Tufano, R.P. Association of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and thyroid cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2015, 27, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Araque, K.A.; Gubbi, S.; Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, J. Updates on the Management of Thyroid Cancer. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 562–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, X. Total thyroidectomy versus lobectomy for papillary thyroid cancer. Medicine 2020, 99, e19073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Carling, T.; Udelsman, R. Thyroid Cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 2014, 65, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Grani, G.; Lamartina, L.; Durante, C.; Filetti, S.; Cooper, D.S. Follicular thyroid cancer and Hürthle cell carcinoma: Challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 500–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Daniels, G.H. Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma: A Perspective. Thyroid 2018, 28, 1229–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Molinaro, E.; Romei, C.; Biagini, A.; Sabini, E.; Agate, L.; Mazzeo, S.; Materazzi, G.; Sellari-Franceschini, S.; Ribechini, A.; Torregrossa, L.; et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: From clinicopathology to genetics and advanced therapies. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 644–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ibrahimpasic, T.; Ghossein, R.; Shah, J.P.; Ganly, I. Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma of the Thyroid Gland: Current Status and Future Prospects. Thyroid 2019, 29, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Ceolin, L.; Duval, M.A.d.S.; Benini, A.F.; Ferreira, C.V.; Maia, A.L. Medullary thyroid carcinoma beyond surgery: Advances, challenges, and perspectives. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, R499–R518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Thomas, C.M.; Asa, S.L.; Ezzat, S.; Sawka, A.M.; Goldstein, D. Diagnosis and pathologic characteristics of medullary thyroid carcinoma—Review of current guidelines. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Puga, F.M.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Hartl, D.M.; Bani, M.-A.; Moog, S.; Pani, F.; Breuskin, I.; Guerlain, J.; Faron, M.; Denadreis, D.; et al. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on otherwise low-risk papillary thyroid carcinomas: A retrospective and observational study. Endocrine 2024, 83, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  44. Shaha, A.R.; Ghossein, R.; Tuttle, R.M. Lymphovascular invasion and active surveillance in thyroid cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO) 2020, 46, 1775–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bestepe, N.; Dirikoc, A.; Baser, H.; Yazicioglu, O.; Aksoy, A.A.; Topaloglu, O.; Ersoy, R.; Cakir, B. Clinical and pathological features of thyroid cancer in adolescents and young adults. Endocr. Abstr. 2021, 73, AEP882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kaouache, N.; Zouraghen, B.; Merabet, S.; Menacer, S.; Grari, S.; Habi, C.; Boulefkhad, R.; Azzouz, N.; Lezzar, A.K.; Nouri, N. AACE2021-A-1098: Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Thyroid Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA): An Algerian Observation. Endocr. Pr. 2021, 27, S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, L.Y.; Ganly, I. Nodal Metastases in Thyroid Cancer: Prognostic Implications and Management. Futur. Oncol. 2016, 12, 981–994, Erratum in Future Oncol. 2016, 12, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. Ito, Y.; Fukushima, M.; Tomoda, C.; Inoue, H.; Kihara, M.; Higashiyama, T.; Uruno, T.; Takamura, Y.; Miya, A.; Kobayashi, K.; et al. Prognosis of Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Having Clinically Apparent Metastasis to the Lateral Compartment. Endocr. J. 2009, 56, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Life 14 00696 g001
Figure 1. Distribution of thyroid tumors cases by age groups (number of cases = 211).
Figure 1. Distribution of thyroid tumors cases by age groups (number of cases = 211).
Life 14 00696 g001
Life 14 00696 g002
Figure 2. Association of thyroid cancer with other thyroid lesions in the age group <45 years (number of cases = 52).
Figure 2. Association of thyroid cancer with other thyroid lesions in the age group <45 years (number of cases = 52).
Life 14 00696 g002
Life 14 00696 g003
Figure 3. Association of thyroid cancer with other thyroid lesions in the age group ≥45 years (number of cases = 159).
Figure 3. Association of thyroid cancer with other thyroid lesions in the age group ≥45 years (number of cases = 159).
Life 14 00696 g003
Life 14 00696 g004
Figure 4. Histopathological types of thyroid cancer: (A) classic PTC subtype, showing papillary growth pattern lined by cells with characteristic nuclear features (circle), H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (B) FVPTC, H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (C) encapsulated, angioinvasive (circle) FTC, H&E staining, ×100; (D) MTC, classic variant, with amyloid deposits in the stroma (arrows), H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (E) PDTC—“insular” type, H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (F) lymph nodal metastasis of a MTC with amyloid deposits in the stroma (arrows), H&E staining, original magnification ×40.
Figure 4. Histopathological types of thyroid cancer: (A) classic PTC subtype, showing papillary growth pattern lined by cells with characteristic nuclear features (circle), H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (B) FVPTC, H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (C) encapsulated, angioinvasive (circle) FTC, H&E staining, ×100; (D) MTC, classic variant, with amyloid deposits in the stroma (arrows), H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (E) PDTC—“insular” type, H&E staining, original magnification ×200; (F) lymph nodal metastasis of a MTC with amyloid deposits in the stroma (arrows), H&E staining, original magnification ×40.
Life 14 00696 g004
Life 14 00696 g005
Figure 5. (A) Evaluation of capsule invasion in the two groups of patients. (B) Evaluation of lympho-vascular invasion in the two groups of patients.
Figure 5. (A) Evaluation of capsule invasion in the two groups of patients. (B) Evaluation of lympho-vascular invasion in the two groups of patients.
Life 14 00696 g005
Table 1. Comparative analysis of the two study groups using the Chi-square test and the Fisher exact test (number of cases = 211).
Table 1. Comparative analysis of the two study groups using the Chi-square test and the Fisher exact test (number of cases = 211).
ParametersGroup I <45 Years (%)Group II ≥45 Years (%)p-Value
SexMen10 (19.23)19 (11.95)0.2444
Females42 (80.77)140 (88.05)
OriginUrban29 (56.86)101 (64.33)0.4055
Rural22 (43.14)56 (35.67)
Type of interventionTotal thyroidectomy40 (76.92)146 (91.82)0.0058
Subtotal right lobectomy7 (13.46)4 (2.52)
Subtotal left lobectomy5 (9.62)7 (4.40)
Tumor fragments (excision biopsy)02 (1.26)
Associated thyroid pathologyThyroid follicular nodular disease (FND)15 (27.27)98 (54.75)0.0004
Lymphocytic chronic thyroiditis18 (32.73)42 (23.46)
Graves–Basedow disease4 (7.27)5 (2.79)
Follicular adenoma1 (1.82)13 (7.26)
Granulomatous thyroiditis02 (1.12)
Fibrous thyroiditis01 (0.56)
Primary hyperparathyroidism1 (1.82)00
Hodgkin’s lymphoma1 (1.82)0
Without relevant associated pathologies15 (27.27)18 (10.06)
Histological subtype of thyroid cancerPapillary microcarcinoma18 (33.33)87 (50.88)0.1211
Papillary carcinoma (PTC)28 (51.85)56 (32.75)
Follicular carcinoma (FTC)3 (5.56)8 (4.68)
Well-differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential (WDT-UMP)5 (9.26)11 (6.43)
Poorly differentiated (PDTC) and anaplastic carcinoma (ATC)05 (2.92)
Medullary carcinoma (MTC)03 (1.75)
Thyroid lymphoma01 (0.58)
Location of the tumorOne lobe34 (65.38)111 (70.70)0.0430
 Both lobes11 (21.15)40 (25.48)
 Extrathyroidal7 (13.46)6 (3.82)
Capsular invasionPresent11 (21.15)20 (12.74)0.1756
 Absent41 (78.85)137 (87.26)
Lympho-vascular invasionPresent12 (23.08)12 (7.64)0.0048
Absent40 (76.92)145 (92.36)
Perineural tumor invasionPresent1 (1.92)6 (3.82)0.6835
 Absent51 (98.08)151 (96.18)
pT classificationpTx7 (13.46)14 (8.81)0.1615
 pT1a17 (32.69)87 (54.72)
 pT1b15 (28.85)31 (19.50)
 pT25 (9.62)14 (8.81)
 pT3a5 (9.62)7 (4.40)
 pT3b3 (5.77)5 (3.14)
 pT4a01 (0.63)
Regional lymph nodes status (pN)pNx36 (69.23)135 (84.91)0.0092
pN09 (17.31)19 (11.95)
pN17 (13.46)5 (3.14)
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; WDT-UMP, well-differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; pT, tumor extension; pN, lymph nodes status.
Table 2. The relationship between capsule invasion and lympho-vascular invasion in the two groups of patients.
Table 2. The relationship between capsule invasion and lympho-vascular invasion in the two groups of patients.
Group I <45 Years OldGroup II ≥45 Years Old
L-VI PresentL-VI Absentp-Value L-VI PresentL-VI Absentp-Value
Capsular invasion present92<0.0001Capsular invasion present812<0.0001
Capsular invasion absent338Capsular invasion absent4133
L-VI: lympho-vascular invasion.
Table 3. The relationship between extrathyroidal tumor extension and lympho-vascular invasion in the two groups of patients.
Table 3. The relationship between extrathyroidal tumor extension and lympho-vascular invasion in the two groups of patients.
Group I <45 Years OldGroup II ≥45 Years Old
L-VI PresentL-VI Absentp-Value L-VI PresentL-VI Absentp-Value
Extrathyroidal tumor extension
present		610.0003Extrathyroidal tumor extension
present		51<0.0001
Extrathyroidal tumor extension
absent		639Extrathyroidal tumor extension
absent		7144
L-VI: lympho-vascular invasion.
Table 4. The relationship between perineural invasion (Pn) and other parameters analyzed for the entire group of patients.
Table 4. The relationship between perineural invasion (Pn) and other parameters analyzed for the entire group of patients.
Pn PresentPn Absentp-Value
Capsular invasion—present5260.0009
Capsular invasion—absent2176
L-VI—present4200.0038
L-VI—absent3182
Extrathyroidal extension2110.0368
Involvement of both thyroid lobes249
Involvement of a single thyroid lobe3142
L-VI, lympho-vascular invasion; Pn, perineural invasion.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jurescu, A.; Brebu, D.; Faur, A.C.; Vita, O.; Barna, R.; Vaduva, A.; Popa, O.; Muresan, A.; Iacob, M.; Cornianu, M.; et al. Clinical–Pathological Features of Thyroid Neoplasms in Young Patients Diagnosed in a Single Center. Life 2024, 14, 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060696

AMA Style

Jurescu A, Brebu D, Faur AC, Vita O, Barna R, Vaduva A, Popa O, Muresan A, Iacob M, Cornianu M, et al. Clinical–Pathological Features of Thyroid Neoplasms in Young Patients Diagnosed in a Single Center. Life. 2024; 14(6):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jurescu, Aura, Dan Brebu, Alexandra Corina Faur, Octavia Vita, Robert Barna, Adrian Vaduva, Oana Popa, Anca Muresan, Mihaela Iacob, Marioara Cornianu, and et al. 2024. "Clinical–Pathological Features of Thyroid Neoplasms in Young Patients Diagnosed in a Single Center" Life 14, no. 6: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop