Next Article in Journal
Use of the Serum Wisteria floribunda Agglutinin-Positive Mac2 Binding Protein as a Marker of Gastroesophageal Varices and Liver-Related Events in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Measurement of Gastric Emptying of a Soup Test Meal Using MRI and Gamma Scintigraphy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/diagnostics10030171
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

GRB10 and E2F3 as Diagnostic Markers of Osteoarthritis and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration

by
Ya-Jun Deng
†,
En-Hui Ren
†,
Wen-Hua Yuan
†,
Guang-Zhi Zhang
,
Zuo-Long Wu
and
Qi-Qi Xie
*
Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics Disease of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2020, 10(3), 171; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030171
Submission received: 29 February 2020 / Revised: 15 March 2020 / Accepted: 19 March 2020 / Published: 22 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to find potential diagnostic markers for osteoarthritis (OA) and analyze the role of immune cells infiltration in this pathology. We used OA datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. First, R software was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and perform functional correlation analysis. Then least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination algorithms were used to screen and verify the diagnostic markers of OA. Finally, CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the infiltration of immune cells in OA tissues, and the correlation between diagnostic markers and infiltrating immune cells was analyzed. A total of 458 DEGs were screened in this study. GRB10 and E2F3 (AUC = 0.962) were identified as diagnostic markers of OA. Immune cell infiltration analysis found that resting mast cells, T regulatory cells, CD4 memory resting T cells, activated NK cells, and eosinophils may be involved in the OA process. In addition, GRB10 was correlated with NK resting cells, naive CD4 + T cells, and M1 macrophages, while E2F3 was correlated with resting mast cells. In conclusion, GRB10 and E2F3 can be used as diagnostic markers of osteoarthritis, and immune cell infiltration plays an important role in the occurrence and progression of OA.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases, especially in the elderly, with approximately 3 million newly diagnosed cases each year [1]. OA is characterized by cartilage degradation, synovial inflammation, subchondral bone remodeling, and osteophyte formation, which ultimately leads to joint function loss [2]. Therefore, OA is considered to be one of the main causes of disability worldwide [3]. Currently, the routine diagnosis of OA is usually based on clinical manifestations and joint imaging techniques; thus, a precise early diagnosis of OA is not possible [4]. Because the diagnosis is not established early, the disease progresses for most patients resulting in a poor prognosis and ineffective treatment options. Therefore, exploring biomarkers that would make an early diagnosis possible is crucial for improving the prognosis of OA patients.
In recent years, more and more studies have shown that immune cell infiltration plays an important role in the occurrence and development of OA. For example, OA joints have been shown to exhibit a distinct pattern of CD4 + T cell infiltration. CD4 + T cells promote the polarization of activated Th1 cells and increase the secretion of immunoregulatory cytokines. This local inflammation further exacerbates the OA process [5]. Moradi et al. [6] showed that OA joints present with immune cell infiltration, including CD14 + macrophages, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and CD16 + CD56 + natural killer cells. Therefore, from the perspective of the immune system, assessing the infiltration of immune cells and determining the differences in the components of infiltrating immune cells are of great value to clarifying the molecular mechanism underlying OA and developing new immunotherapeutic targets. CIBERSORT is an analysis tool that uses RNA-seq data to evaluate the expression of immune cells and obtain various immune cell proportions from samples [7]. It has been widely used in the analysis of immune cell infiltration in a variety of diseases such as lupus nephritis [8], atopic dermatitis [9], and colorectal cancer [10]. However, so far, no studies have used CIBERSORT to analyze immune cell infiltration in OA.
In this study, we first downloaded the microarray dataset of OA from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and performed differential expression gene analysis and then used machine learning algorithms to further screen and determine the diagnostic markers of OA. Subsequently, we used CIBERSORT for the first time to analyze the difference in immune infiltration between OA tissues and normal tissues in 22 immune cell subsets. In addition, we studied the relationship between diagnostic markers and infiltrating immune cells to better understand the molecular immune mechanism during the development of OA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Download

We used the “GEOquery” package [11] of R software (version 3.6.1, http://r-project.org/) to download the OA expression profile datasets GSE55235 [12], GSE55457 [12], and GSE51588 [13] from the GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database [14].

2.2. Data Preprocessing and Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) Screening

Raw data of GSE55235, GSE55457, and GSE51588 datasets were read through the “affy” package [15], and the RMA algorithm was used for background correction and data normalization. The GSE55235 and GSE55457 gene expression matrices were then combined, and the inter-batch difference was removed using the “sva” package [16]. The quantile–quantile plot (Q–Q plot) was used to visualize the effect of removing inter-batch difference, and the effect of inter-sample correction was demonstrated using a two-dimensional PCA cluster plot. DEGs were screened by the “limma” package [17], and a volcano map of DEGs was drawn using the “ggplot2” package [18] to show the differential expression of DEGs. DEGs with p < 0.05 and |log2FC|>1 were considered statistically significant.

2.3. Functional Correlation Analysis

We used the “clusterProfiler” package [19] to perform Gene Ontology (GO) and Disease Ontology (DO) enrichment analyses on DEGs, respectively. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on the gene expression matrix through the “clusterProfiler” package and “c2.cp.kegg.v7.0.symbols.gmt” was selected as the reference gene set. A false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25 and p < 0.05 were considered significant enrichment.

2.4. Screening and Verification of Diagnostic Markers

We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression [20] and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) [21] to perform feature selection to screen diagnostic markers for OA. The expression matrices of the GSE55235, GSE55457, and GSE51588 data–sets were merged into an independent data–set after quality control, and then the joint diagnostic efficiency of the obtained diagnostic markers was verified based on this independent data–set. The LASSO algorithm was applied with the “glmnet” package [22]. Furthermore, SVM-RFE is a machine learning method based on support vector machine, which is used to find the best variables by deleting SVM-generated eigenvectors. SVM module was established to further identify the diagnostic value of these biomarkers in OA by “e1071” package [23]. Ultimately, we combined the genes from either LASSO or SVM-RFE algorithms for further analysis. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

2.5. Evaluation of Immune Cell Infiltration

We uploaded the gene expression matrix data to CIBERSORT, filtered out the samples with p < 0.05, and obtained the immune cell infiltration matrix. Then, we used “ggplot2” package to perform PCA clustering analysis on immune cell infiltration matrix data to draw a two-dimensional PCA clustering map. “corrplot” package [24] was used to draw a correlation heatmap to visualize the correlation of 22 types of infiltrating immune cells; “ggplot2” package was used to draw violin diagrams to visualize the differences in immune cell infiltration.

2.6. Correlation Analysis between Diagnostic Markers and Infiltrating Immune Cells

The “ggstatsplot” package (https://github.com/IndrajeetPatil/ggstatsplot) was used to perform Spearman correlation analysis on diagnostic markers and infiltrating immune cells and the “ggplot2” package was used to visualize the results.

3. Results

3.1. Data Preprocessing and DEGs Screening

First, the inter-batch difference was removed from the gene expression matrix after merging the GSE55235 and GSE55457 datasets, and the Q-Q plot was used to show the effect (Figure 1). The results showed that the inter-batch difference has been removed. The merged gene expression matrix was then normalized and processed, and it is presented in a two-dimensional PCA cluster diagram before and after normalization (Figure 2A,B). The results showed that the clustering of the two groups of samples was more obvious after normalization, indicating that the sample source was reliable. After data preprocessing, we used R software to extract a total of 458 DEGs from the gene expression matrix, as shown in the volcano map (Figure 2C).

3.2. Functional Correlation Analysis

GO analysis results showed that DEGs were mainly related to leukocyte migration, positive regulation of response to an external stimulus, cell chemotaxis, and regulation of leukocyte migration (Figure 3A). The DO analysis results are shown in Figure 3B. Diseases enriched by DEGs mainly included chronic lymphocytic leukemia, osteoarthritis, pancreas disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. GSEA results showed that the enriched pathways mainly involved PD1 signaling and the translocation of ZAP-70 to the immunological synapse pathway (Figure 4). HLA−DPA1, HLA−DQA1, HLA−DPB1, HLA−DRA, CD3D, and CD4 played important roles in the signal transduction process of the two pathways. The above results suggest that the immune response plays an important role in OA.

3.3. Screening and Verification of Diagnostic Markers

We used LASSO logistic regression algorithm to identify 14 genes from DEGs as diagnostic markers for OA (Figure 5A); seven genes were identified from DEGs using the SVM-RFE algorithm as diagnostic markers (Figure 5B). The gene markers obtained by the two algorithms were overlapped, and finally two diagnostic related genes were obtained (Figure 5C). In order to further test the diagnostic efficacy of GRB10 and E2F3, we validated it with the GSE51588 dataset as the validation set. When GRB10 and E2F3 were fitted into one variable, the diagnostic efficiency was 1 in the training set and reached a higher level in the validation set (AUC = 0.962) (Figure 5D), indicating that GRB10 and E2F3 had high diagnostic value.

3.4. Immune Cell Infiltration Results

PCA cluster analysis can be used to test the consistency of biological repetition and the difference of different groups. PCA cluster analysis results of immune cell infiltration showed that there was a significant difference in immune cell infiltration between the OA sample and the control sample (Figure 6A). Correlation heatmap of the 22 types of immune cells revealed that activated NK cells, activated dendritic cells, and eosinophils had a significant positive correlation. Resting CD4 memory T cells and activated mast cells also had a positive correlation. Resting CD4 memory T cells had a significant negative correlation with regulatory T cells, and activated NK cells had a negative correlation with resting mast cells (Figure 6B). The violin plot of the immune cell infiltration difference showed that, compared with the normal control sample, regulatory T cells and resting mast cells infiltrated more, while resting CD4 memory T cells, activated NK cells, activated mast cells, and eosinophils infiltrated less (Figure 6C).

3.5. Correlation Analysis between GRB10, E2F3, and Infiltrating Immune Cells

Correlation analysis showed that GRB10 was positively correlated with resting NK cells (r = 0.642, p = 0.002), and naive CD4 + T cells (r = 0.525, p = 0.018) and negatively correlated with macrophages M1 (r = −0.482, p = 0.031) (Figure 7A); E2F3 was negatively correlated with resting mast cells (r = −0.552, p = 0.012) (Figure 7B).

4. Discussion

OA is a chronic joint disease that causes cartilage degradation, synovial inflammation, subchondral bone remodeling, and osteophyte formation [25]. Due to the lack of early diagnostic indicators, patients with OA often lose the best opportunity for treatment, resulting in a poor prognosis. In addition, research shows that immune cell infiltration plays an important role in the development of OA [5,6]. Therefore, finding specific diagnostic markers and analyzing the pattern of OA immune cell infiltration have profound significance for improving the prognosis of OA patients. With the rapid development of science and technology, bioinformatics has provided a powerful strategy for screening molecular markers, and CIBERSORT tools have also facilitated the analysis of immune cell infiltration patterns of diseases. In this study, we sought to identify diagnostic markers for OA and further explore the role of immune cell infiltration in OA.
We downloaded the OA expression profile dataset from the GEO database and identified a total of 458 DEGs. GO enrichment analysis showed that DEGs were mainly related to leukocyte migration, positive regulation of response to external stimulus, and cell chemotaxis. The diseases enriched by DO mainly include chronic lymphocytic leukemia, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The above results suggest that the immune response plays an important role in OA. In addition, the pathway enriched by GSEA mainly involves PD1 signaling and translocation of ZAP-70 to the immunological synapse. Shan et al. [26] showed that the percentage of PD1 in peripheral blood of patients with OA is significantly higher than that of healthy patients, which may play an important role in the progression of OA. The above research results are consistent with our analysis data, suggesting that the analysis results of this study are accurate.
SVM-RFE is a machine learning method based on support vector machines that searches for the best variable by subtracting the feature vectors generated by SVM [20]. LASSO logistic regression is also a machine learning method that determines the variable by finding λ when the classification error is the smallest [21]. The two algorithms are mainly used to screen feature variables and build the best classification model. In this study, GRB10 and E2F3 were identified as diagnostic markers of OA by combining SVM-RFE and LASSO logistic regression methods. Each algorithm has its own inherent characteristics. It should be noted, however, that the GRB10 and E2F3, which were selected by integrating the union of features from LASSO and SVM-RFE, were reliable in further validations in this study, suggesting that the integration strategy was feasible. The encoded product of GRB10 is an adaptor protein that interacts with insulin receptors and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors participating in processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration [27,28]. One study showed that GRB10 is highly expressed in leukemia, and that the level of GRB10 expression is related to the survival of leukemia patients [29]. Grb10 plays a key role in the function of vascular smooth muscle cells by regulating the proliferation, migration, and inflammatory gene expression of these cells [30]. Another study reported that the expression of GRB10 in the hippocampus of diabetic rats is increased, impairing neural function and cognition by negatively regulating the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor signaling pathway [31]. Moreover, the expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 is related to the proliferation, differentiation, and matrix synthesis of chondrocytes, which are essential in cartilage morphogenesis [32]. Given that GRB10-encoded proteins often interact with insulin receptors and insulin-like growth factor receptors, we believe that GRB10 is likely to be involved in regulating the pathological process of OA. E2F3 is a member of the E2F family and exists in most cell types in the body. It targets retinoblastoma proteins and plays an important role in cell cycle and proliferation [33]. A study has shown that E2F3 plays a key role in muscle and bone development and affects the normal growth of mice [34]. Inhibition of E2F3 expression promotes the development of diabetic nephropathy [35]. Furthermore, E2F3 plays a key role in various biological processes such as lens development, cardiac neovascularization, DNA damage response, and neuronal migration [36,37,38,39]. E2F3 protein is an important participant in the cell cycle process, and an abnormal regulation of the cell cycle is closely related to the development of OA [40]. Therefore, we speculate that E2F3 may play an important role in the disease progression of OA. Evidence from previous studies suggests that GRB10 and E2F3 may be involved in the development of OA and have the potential to be used as diagnostic markers for OA, but numerous clinical studies are still needed to verify the diagnostic value of GRB10 and E2F3.
To further explore the role of immune cell infiltration in OA, we used CIBERSORT to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of OA immune infiltration. We found that an increased infiltration of mast cells, regulatory T cells, and a decreased infiltration of resting CD4 T cells, activated NK cells, and eosinophils may be related to the occurrence and development of OA. Previous studies have shown that the infiltration of mast cells in the OA synovial tissue is relatively high and is related to structural damage in patients with OA [41]. It has also been shown that regulatory T cells are abundant in OA, and their level corelates with inflammatory factor levels [42]. Ezawa et al. [43] found that the accumulation of memory CD4 + T cells is a common phenomenon during the local inflammatory response of joints and may be involved in the formation of chronic OA. Benigni et al. [44] confirmed through in vivo experiments that neutrophils and NK cells play an important role in osteoarthritis, and their interaction is promoted by the CXCL10/CXCR3 axis. The above literature evidence combined with our analysis results have shown that resting mast cells, regulatory T cells, resting CD4 memory T cells, and activated NK cells play important roles in OA and should be the highlight of further studies. However, there is no research conducted on the role of eosinophils in OA, and further experimental data are required. In addition, our results reveal details of infiltration of 22 types of immune cells in OA. Activated mast cells and regulatory T cells infiltration are closely related to resting CD4 memory T cells infiltration; activated NK cells and activated dendritic cells infiltration are closely related to eosinophils infiltration. The specific mechanisms of these correlations require further experimental evidence.
By analyzing the correlation between GRB10, E2F3, and immune cells, it was found that GRB10 was significantly positively correlated with resting NK cells, and naive CD4 + T cells and negatively correlated with M1 macrophages. E2F3 was significantly negatively correlated with resting mast cells. Studies have shown that NK cells and mast cells play important roles in osteoarthritis [41,44]; M1 macrophages polarization in the synovium can aggravate the OA process [45]. Therefore, we speculate that GRB10 raises NK cells and naive CD4 + T cells or reduces M1 macrophages cells and E2F3 reduces mast cells to participate in the occurrence and progress of OA. These assumptions require further research to clarify the complex interactions between genes and immune cells.
We employed novel scientific methods such as SVM-RFE and LASSO logistic regression algorithms to verify OA diagnostic markers and, for the first time, CIBERSORT to analyze immune cell infiltration in OA tissues. However, our research has certain limitations. CIBERSORT analysis is based on limited genetic data that may deviate from heterotypic interactions of cells, disease-induced disorders, or phenotypic plasticity; in addition, our research represents the second mining and analysis of previously published data sets. Although some previous research results are consistent with our analysis results, the reliability of the results of this study needs to be further experimentally validated.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that GRB10 and E2F3 are diagnostic markers of OA. We also found that regulatory T cells, resting mast cells, resting CD4 memory T cells, activated NK cells, and eosinophils may be involved in the occurrence and progress of OA. In addition, GRB10 was significantly associated with resting NK cells, naive CD4 + T cells, and M1 macrophages, and E2F3 was significantly associated with resting mast cells. These immune cells may play a key role in the development of OA, and further exploration of these immune cells may determine the targets of OA immunotherapy and help improve immunomodulatory therapies for OA patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-H.Y. and G.-Z.Z.; methodology, Z.-L.W.; software, E.-H.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.D.; writing—review and editing, Q.-Q.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work has benefited from GEO. We thank the GEO network for its generous sharing of large amounts of data. We would like to thank FigureYa (Xiao Ya Hua Tu) for the figure technology support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Palazzo, C.; Nguyen, C.; Lefevre-Colau, M.M.; Rannou, F.; Poiraudeau, S. Risk factors and burden of osteoarthritis. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2016, 59, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Murphy, C.A.; Garg, A.K.; Silva-Correia, J.; Reis, R.L.; Oliveira, J.M.; Collins, M.N. The Meniscus in Normal and Osteoarthritic Tissues: Facing the Structure Property Challenges and Current Treatment Trends. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 21, 495–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cross, M.; Smith, E.; Hoy, D.; Nolte, S.; Ackerman, I.; Fransen, M.; Bridgett, L.; Williams, S.; Guillemin, F.; Hill, C.L.; et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Elsadek, B.E.M.; Abdelghany, A.A.; Abd El-Aziz, M.A.; Madkor, H.R.; Abd Elrady Ahmed, A.; Abd-Elghaffar, S.K.; Elsadek, A.A.M. Validation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of ADAMTS5 and FSTL1 in Osteoarthritis Rat Model. Cartilage 2019, 1947603519852405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rosshirt, N.; Hagmann, S.; Tripel, E.; Gotterbarm, T.; Kirsch, J.; Zeifang, F.; Lorenz, H.M.; Tretter, T.; Moradi, B. A predominant Th1 polarization is present in synovial fluid of end-stage osteoarthritic knee joints: Analysis of peripheral blood, synovial fluid and synovial membrane. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2019, 195, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moradi, B.; Rosshirt, N.; Tripel, E.; Kirsch, J.; Barie, A.; Zeifang, F.; Gotterbarm, T.; Hagmann, S. Unicompartmental and bicompartmental knee osteoarthritis show different patterns of mononuclear cell infiltration and cytokine release in the affected joints. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 180, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Newman, A.M.; Liu, C.L.; Green, M.R.; Gentles, A.J.; Feng, W.; Xu, Y.; Hoang, C.D.; Diehn, M.; Alizadeh, A.A. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Cao, Y.; Tang, W.; Tang, W. Immune cell infiltration characteristics and related core genes in lupus nephritis: Results from bioinformatic analysis. BMC Immunol. 2019, 20, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Felix Garza, Z.C.; Lenz, M.; Liebmann, J.; Ertaylan, G.; Born, M.; Arts, I.C.W.; Hilbers, P.A.J.; van Riel, N.A.W. Characterization of disease-specific cellular abundance profiles of chronic inflammatory skin conditions from deconvolution of biopsy samples. BMC Med. Genom. 2019, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ge, P.; Wang, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, G.; Gao, Z.; Tang, Z.; Dang, X.; Wu, Y. Profiles of immune cell infiltration and immune-related genes in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 118, 109228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Davis, S.; Meltzer, P.S. GEOquery: A bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1846–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Woetzel, D.; Huber, R.; Kupfer, P.; Pohlers, D.; Pfaff, M.; Driesch, D.; Haupl, T.; Koczan, D.; Stiehl, P.; Guthke, R.; et al. Identification of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients by transcriptome-based rule set generation. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, R84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Chou, C.H.; Wu, C.C.; Song, I.W.; Chuang, H.P.; Lu, L.S.; Chang, J.H.; Kuo, S.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Wu, J.Y.; Chen, Y.T.; et al. Genome-wide expression profiles of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013, 15, R190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Barrett, T.; Wilhite, S.E.; Ledoux, P.; Evangelista, C.; Kim, I.F.; Tomashevsky, M.; Marshall, K.A.; Phillippy, K.H.; Sherman, P.M.; Holko, M.; et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets--update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D991–D995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gautier, L.; Cope, L.; Bolstad, B.M.; Irizarry, R.A. affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Parker, H.S.; Leek, J.T.; Favorov, A.V.; Considine, M.; Xia, X.; Chavan, S.; Chung, C.H.; Fertig, E.J. Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2757–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ginestet, C. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2011, 174, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, G.; Wang, L.G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tibshirani, R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1996, 58, 267–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suykens, J.A.K.; Vandewalle, J. Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 1999, 9, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Friedman, J.; Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 33, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Huang, M.-L.; Hung, Y.-H.; Lee, W.M.; Li, R.K.; Jiang, B.-R. SVM-RFE based feature selection and Taguchi parameters optimization for multiclass SVM classifier. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 795624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Friendly, M. Corrgrams: Exploratory displays for correlation matrices. Am. Stat. 2002, 56, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xie, C.; Chen, Q. Adipokines: New Therapeutic Target for Osteoarthritis? Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2019, 21, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shan, Y.; Qi, C.; Liu, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhao, D.; Jiang, Y. Increased frequency of peripheral blood follicular helper T cells and elevated serum IL21 levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Dufresne, A.M.; Smith, R.J. The adapter protein GRB10 is an endogenous negative regulator of insulin-like growth factor signaling. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 4399–4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Morrione, A. Grb10 adapter protein as regulator of insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 2003, 197, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kazi, J.U.; Ronnstrand, L. FLT3 signals via the adapter protein Grb10 and overexpression of Grb10 leads to aberrant cell proliferation in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol. Oncol. 2013, 7, 402–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reddy, M.A.; Das, S.; Zhuo, C.; Jin, W.; Wang, M.; Lanting, L.; Natarajan, R. Regulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Dysfunction Under Diabetic Conditions by miR-504. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ma, L.; Wei, Q.; Deng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, G.; Tang, N.; Xie, J.; Chen, Y. Growth factor receptor-bound protein 10-mediated negative regulation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor-activated signalling pathway results in cognitive disorder in diabetic rats. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2013, 25, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lam, C.S.; Chen, M.H.; Lacey, S.M.; Yang, Q.; Sullivan, L.M.; Xanthakis, V.; Safa, R.; Smith, H.M.; Peng, X.; Sawyer, D.B.; et al. Circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding protein-3: Metabolic and genetic correlates in the community. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 1479–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Dyson, N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 2245–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, H.R.; Rahman, F.U.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, E.K.; Cho, S.M.; Lee, K.; Moon, O.S.; Seo, Y.W.; Yoon, W.K.; Won, Y.S.; et al. Critical Roles of E2F3 in Growth and Musculo-skeletal Phenotype in Mice. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 16, 1557–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zha, F.; Bai, L.; Tang, B.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Ji, T.; Bai, S. MicroRNA-503 contributes to podocyte injury via targeting E2F3 in diabetic nephropathy. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 12574–12581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhou, J.; Wu, M.; Xu, S.; Cheng, M.; Ding, C.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H.; Biyashev, D.; Kishore, R.; Qin, G. Contrasting roles of E2F2 and E2F3 in cardiac neovascularization. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Martinez, L.A.; Goluszko, E.; Chen, H.Z.; Leone, G.; Post, S.; Lozano, G.; Chen, Z.; Chauchereau, A. E2F3 is a mediator of DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 524–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cloud, J.E.; Rogers, C.; Reza, T.L.; Ziebold, U.; Stone, J.R.; Picard, M.H.; Caron, A.M.; Bronson, R.T.; Lees, J.A. Mutant mouse models reveal the relative roles of E2F1 and E2F3 in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 2663–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. McClellan, K.A.; Ruzhynsky, V.A.; Douda, D.N.; Vanderluit, J.L.; Ferguson, K.L.; Chen, D.; Bremner, R.; Park, D.S.; Leone, G.; Slack, R.S. Unique requirement for Rb/E2F3 in neuronal migration: Evidence for cell cycle-independent functions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 4825–4843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. de Andres, M.C.; Takahashi, A.; Oreffo, R.O. Demethylation of an NF-kappaB enhancer element orchestrates iNOS induction in osteoarthritis and is associated with altered chondrocyte cell cycle. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. de Lange-Brokaar, B.J.; Kloppenburg, M.; Andersen, S.N.; Dorjee, A.L.; Yusuf, E.; Herb-van Toorn, L.; Kroon, H.M.; Zuurmond, A.M.; Stojanovic-Susulic, V.; Bloem, J.L.; et al. Characterization of synovial mast cells in knee osteoarthritis: Association with clinical parameters. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Xia, J.; Ni, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhu, S.; Ye, H. Overexpression of Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 Inhibits Regulatory T Cell Responses in Osteoarthritis. DNA Cell Biol. 2017, 36, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ezawa, K.; Yamamura, M.; Matsui, H.; Ota, Z.; Makino, H. Comparative analysis of CD45RA- and CD45RO-positive CD4+T cells in peripheral blood, synovial fluid, and synovial tissue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Acta Med. Okayama 1997, 51, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Benigni, G.; Dimitrova, P.; Antonangeli, F.; Sanseviero, E.; Milanova, V.; Blom, A.; van Lent, P.; Morrone, S.; Santoni, A.; Bernardini, G. CXCR3/CXCL10 Axis Regulates Neutrophil-NK Cell Cross-Talk Determining the Severity of Experimental Osteoarthritis. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2115–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, H.; Lin, C.; Zeng, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Lu, J.; Liu, X.; Shao, Y.; Zhao, C.; Pan, J.; et al. Synovial macrophage M1 polarisation exacerbates experimental osteoarthritis partially through R-spondin-2. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1524–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 10 00171 g001 550
Figure 1. The quantile–quantile (Q-Q) plot of the inter-batch difference of GSE55235 and GSE55457 datasets is removed. The red line represents the density map of the GSE55235 data distribution, the black line represents the density map of the GSE55457 data distribution, and the black circles represent the quantiles corresponding to the same cumulative probability.
Figure 1. The quantile–quantile (Q-Q) plot of the inter-batch difference of GSE55235 and GSE55457 datasets is removed. The red line represents the density map of the GSE55235 data distribution, the black line represents the density map of the GSE55457 data distribution, and the black circles represent the quantiles corresponding to the same cumulative probability.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g001
Diagnostics 10 00171 g002 550
Figure 2. Two-dimensional PCA cluster plot before and after sample correction and volcano map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (A,B) Two-dimensional PCA cluster plot of the GSE55235 and GSE55457 datasets before and after sample correction; blue represents the osteoarthritis (OA) group, and red represents the normal control group. (C) Volcano map of DEGs; red represents up-regulated differential genes, grey represents no significant difference genes, and green represents down-regulated differential genes.
Figure 2. Two-dimensional PCA cluster plot before and after sample correction and volcano map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (A,B) Two-dimensional PCA cluster plot of the GSE55235 and GSE55457 datasets before and after sample correction; blue represents the osteoarthritis (OA) group, and red represents the normal control group. (C) Volcano map of DEGs; red represents up-regulated differential genes, grey represents no significant difference genes, and green represents down-regulated differential genes.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g002
Diagnostics 10 00171 g003 550
Figure 3. Gene Ontology (GO) and Disease Ontology (DO) enrichment analyses of DEGs. (A) GO enrichment analysis, where the horizontal axis represents the number of DEGs under the GO term. (B) DO enrichment analysis, where the horizontal axis represents the number of DEGs under the DO term.
Figure 3. Gene Ontology (GO) and Disease Ontology (DO) enrichment analyses of DEGs. (A) GO enrichment analysis, where the horizontal axis represents the number of DEGs under the GO term. (B) DO enrichment analysis, where the horizontal axis represents the number of DEGs under the DO term.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g003
Diagnostics 10 00171 g004 550
Figure 4. Gene set enrichment analysis. P-values were determined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Figure 4. Gene set enrichment analysis. P-values were determined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g004
Diagnostics 10 00171 g005 550
Figure 5. Screening and verification of diagnostic markers. (A) Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm to screen diagnostic markers. Different colors represent different genes. (B) Support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm to screen diagnostic markers. (C) Venn diagram shows the intersection of diagnostic markers obtained by the two algorithms. (D) The ROC curve of the diagnostic efficacy verification after fitting two diagnostic markers to one variable.
Figure 5. Screening and verification of diagnostic markers. (A) Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm to screen diagnostic markers. Different colors represent different genes. (B) Support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm to screen diagnostic markers. (C) Venn diagram shows the intersection of diagnostic markers obtained by the two algorithms. (D) The ROC curve of the diagnostic efficacy verification after fitting two diagnostic markers to one variable.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g005
Diagnostics 10 00171 g006 550
Figure 6. Evaluation and visualization of immune cell infiltration. (A) PCA cluster plot of immune cell infiltration between OA samples and control samples. (B) Correlation heat map of 22 types of immune cells. The size of the colored squares represents the strength of the correlation; blue represents a positive correlation, red represents a negative correlation. The darker the color, the stronger the correlation. (C) Violin diagram of the proportion of 22 types of immune cells. The red marks represent the difference in infiltration between the two groups of samples.
Figure 6. Evaluation and visualization of immune cell infiltration. (A) PCA cluster plot of immune cell infiltration between OA samples and control samples. (B) Correlation heat map of 22 types of immune cells. The size of the colored squares represents the strength of the correlation; blue represents a positive correlation, red represents a negative correlation. The darker the color, the stronger the correlation. (C) Violin diagram of the proportion of 22 types of immune cells. The red marks represent the difference in infiltration between the two groups of samples.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g006
Diagnostics 10 00171 g007 550
Figure 7. Correlation between GRB10, E2F3, and infiltrating immune cells. (A) Correlation between GRB10 and infiltrating immune cells. (B) Correlation between E2F3 and infiltrating immune cells. The size of the dots represents the strength of the correlation between genes and immune cells; the larger the dots, the stronger the correlation, and the smaller the dots, the weaker the correlation. The color of the dots represents the p-value, the greener the color, the lower the p-value, and the yellower the color, the larger the p-value. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 7. Correlation between GRB10, E2F3, and infiltrating immune cells. (A) Correlation between GRB10 and infiltrating immune cells. (B) Correlation between E2F3 and infiltrating immune cells. The size of the dots represents the strength of the correlation between genes and immune cells; the larger the dots, the stronger the correlation, and the smaller the dots, the weaker the correlation. The color of the dots represents the p-value, the greener the color, the lower the p-value, and the yellower the color, the larger the p-value. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Diagnostics 10 00171 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, Y.-J.; Ren, E.-H.; Yuan, W.-H.; Zhang, G.-Z.; Wu, Z.-L.; Xie, Q.-Q. GRB10 and E2F3 as Diagnostic Markers of Osteoarthritis and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030171

AMA Style

Deng Y-J, Ren E-H, Yuan W-H, Zhang G-Z, Wu Z-L, Xie Q-Q. GRB10 and E2F3 as Diagnostic Markers of Osteoarthritis and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(3):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Ya-Jun, En-Hui Ren, Wen-Hua Yuan, Guang-Zhi Zhang, Zuo-Long Wu, and Qi-Qi Xie. 2020. "GRB10 and E2F3 as Diagnostic Markers of Osteoarthritis and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration" Diagnostics 10, no. 3: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030171

APA Style

Deng, Y. -J., Ren, E. -H., Yuan, W. -H., Zhang, G. -Z., Wu, Z. -L., & Xie, Q. -Q. (2020). GRB10 and E2F3 as Diagnostic Markers of Osteoarthritis and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration. Diagnostics, 10(3), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop