Next Article in Journal
Hemodynamic Monitoring in Sepsis—A Conceptual Framework of Macro- and Microcirculatory Alterations
Previous Article in Journal
Faster Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network in the Classification of Different Parkinsonism Patterns of the Striatum on Maximum Intensity Projection Images of [18F]FP-CIT Positron Emission Tomography
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Effectiveness of Methotrexate versus Methylprednisolone in Treatment Naïve Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/diagnostics11091558
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis

by
Nicol Bernardinello
1,†,
Simone Petrarulo
1,†,
Elisabetta Balestro
1,
Elisabetta Cocconcelli
1,
Marcel Veltkamp
2 and
Paolo Spagnolo
1,*
1
Respiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
2
Department of Pulmonology, ILD Center of Excellence, St. Antonius Hospital, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These two authors contributed equally to this work as first authors.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1558; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091558
Submission received: 11 July 2021 / Revised: 11 August 2021 / Accepted: 25 August 2021 / Published: 28 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Sarcoidosis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown origin and poorly understood pathogenesis that predominantly affects lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes and is characterized by the presence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in involved organs. The disease is highly heterogeneous and can mimic a plethora of other disorders, making diagnosis a challenge even for experienced physicians. The evolution and severity of sarcoidosis are highly variable: many patients are asymptomatic and their disease course is generally benign with spontaneous resolution. However, up to one-third of patients develop chronic or progressive disease mainly due to pulmonary or cardiovascular complications that require long-term therapy. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis requires histopathological evidence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in one or more organs coupled with compatible clinical and radiological features and the exclusion of other causes of granulomatous inflammation; however, in the presence of typical disease manifestations such as Löfgren’s syndrome, Heerfordt’s syndrome, lupus pernio and asymptomatic bilateral and symmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy, the diagnosis can be established with high level of certainty on clinical grounds alone. This review critically examines the diagnostic approach to sarcoidosis and emphasizes the importance of a careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses.

1. Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a chronic systemic disorder of unknown origin characterized histologically by the presence of noncaseating granulomas in affected organs. Although the disease pathogenesis remains poorly understood, sarcoidosis is believed to result from a complex interaction between host/genetic and environmental/infectious factors leading to an aberrant immune response [1]. The lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes are almost invariably involved, but sarcoidosis can affect any organ system [2,3]. Because no specific diagnostic test or gold standard exists, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is most likely to be correct if compatible clinical and radiological features are supported by the presence of noncaseating granulomas in affected organs and after exclusion of other causes of granulomatous inflammation. Indeed, sarcoidosis can mimic a large number of conditions, including, among others, infection, vasculitis, drug reaction and malignancy. However, a diagnosis of sarcoidosis can be established on clinical ground alone in the following scenarios: asymptomatic patients with bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL; radiological stage I), Löfgren’s syndrome, Heerfordt’s syndrome and lupus pernio (purplish papules or plaques that usually involve the nose, cheeks, lips, ears and eyelids). In such cases, a histological confirmation of the diagnosis is not required, but close clinical follow-up is advised [4]. Sarcoidosis is generally benign and the majority of patients do not require treatment, with spontaneous resolution occurring in approximately 50% of cases [5]. However, approximately one-third of patients develop chronic or progressive disease [6], and about 5% will eventually die, mainly from pulmonary or cardiovascular complications [7,8,9].
This review aims to summarise recent advances in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, with emphasis on the role of imaging and the importance of a careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses.

2. Epidemiology and Definition

Sarcoidosis occurs worldwide and most commonly affects young and middle-aged individuals of all races and genders. The precise annual incidence and prevalence of the disease are unknown, mainly due to the variable methods of cases ascertainment, lack of consistent case definition and heterogeneous disease manifestations. In addition, in a minority of cases, sarcoidosis remains undiagnosed unless radiographic screening is undertaken [10]. With these limitations, it is well established that the incidence of sarcoidosis varies widely across geographical areas, age groups and races, being more frequent in Scandanavian countries and in African Americans, who also tend to be affected with more severe disease than patients of other ethnicities [2,11]. On the contrary, the incidence of sarcoidosis is lower in Hispanic and Asian populations [12].
Overall, the average age of onset in most studies is between 47 and 51 years, with the peak ages of onset closer to 30–55 years [12]. Sarcoidosis is rare in the pediatric population, whereas approximately 30% of cases occur in elderly patients [13].

3. Clinical Features

Sarcoidosis has numerous clinical manifestations, but respiratory tract involvement occurs at some point in nearly all patients. Dry cough, dyspnea and chest discomfort are the most common symptoms and are generally more prominent in patients with significant endobronchial or parenchymal involvement [14]. The skin, eyes, liver, spleen and peripheral lymph nodes are the next most common disease sites, with the frequency of involvement ranging from 10% to 30% [15]. Cardiac and neurological disease are uncommon but potentially lethal complications [16,17]. Manifestations such as small fiber neuropathy and fatigue are not organ-specific and have been reported in as many as 86% and more than 90% of patients, respectively [18,19].
Some forms of sarcoidosis are characterized by specific constellation of manifestations: Löfgren’s syndrome, which is generally acute, benign and self-limiting, is characterized by fever, BHL, erythema nodosum, and periarthritis [20], whereas Heerfordt’s syndrome is characterized by parotid or salivary glands enlargement, fever, facial nerve paralysis and anterior uveitis [2,21].

4. Pulmonary Function Tests

Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are useful to assess the severity of respiratory involvement and to monitor the disease course. Different from other interstitial lung disease such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary function tests in sarcoidosis do not provide an accurate estimate of the extent of parenchymal disease nor can they predict response to treatment; in fact, some patients could present an extended parenchymal radiological impairment with normal or minimally altered PFT.
The majority of patients with sarcoidosis have a normal lung function [22]. In patients with abnormal PFTs both restrictive as well as obstructive patterns can be found, but the most noted abnormality is a reduced diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) [22,23]. Furthermore, significant differences in PFT parameters among patients with different radiographic stages of sarcoidosis have been shown [22].

5. Imaging

5.1. Chest Radiography

Pulmonary imaging has a key role in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and all patients evaluated for suspected sarcoidosis should have a chest X-ray. This is abnormal in more than 90% of cases, with bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy and parenchymal changes being observed in 50 to 85% and 25 to 60% of cases, respectively [24]. In the 1960s, Guy Scadding developed a “staging system” for pulmonary sarcoidosis using chest radiography: stage I is defined by the presence of BHL; stage II consists of BHL and parenchymal infiltrates; stage III is characterized by parenchymal abnormalities without BHL; stage IV consists of upper-lobe predominant fibrotic changes with volume loss [25]. The frequencies of the different stages at presentation are 50% for stage I, 25–30% for stage II, 10–12% for stage III and 5% for stage IV [26].
Radiographic resolution occurs in three-quarters of patients with stage I and two-thirds of patients with stage II. Patients with higher radiographic stages tend to have more pulmonary symptoms, greater functional impairment and lower likelihood of remission. However, due to the significant overlap between stages, the Scadding system alone cannot be used to predict outcome in individual patients [27]. In addition, there is not necessarily a progression to a higher stage, and, with the exception of stage IV, radiographic resolution may occur with any stage.

5.2. Computed Tomography (CT Scan)

Chest high resolution CT (HRCT) is more sensitive than chest X-ray and provides a more precise assessment of hilar, mediastinal and parenchymal abnormalities (Figure 1). A typical HRCT feature in sarcoidosis is the presence of well-defined micronodules scattered along the broncho-vascular bundle, veins, fissures and pleura in a characteristic lymphatic distribution [28]. The micronodules can be confluent, leading to mass-like conglomerations and distortion of the lung parenchyma [29]. Occasionally, conglomerate masses are surrounded by a multitude of micronodules, hence the term “galaxy sign”, which is highly suggestive of pulmonary sarcoidosis. All these abnormalities typically display a mid-to-upper zone predominance.
Additional HRCT findings include ground glass opacities and septal and nonseptal lines [30]. Up to 20% of cases develop pulmonary fibrosis, which manifests on HRCT as bronchial distortion (40% of cases), honeycombing (26% of cases) and linear scarring (14% of cases) [31,32]. Complications of fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis include pulmonary hypertension and mycetoma, with hemoptysis representing a rare but potentially life-threatening manifestation [33].

5.3. Positron Emission Tomography (FDG PET/CT)

Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is a useful tool for assessing sarcoidosis activity, with a sensitivity of 89 to 100% [34]. In addition, FDG PET/CT may be useful for identifying occult disease (i.e., cardiac or osseous sarcoidosis), or the most suitable site to biopsy and for assessing disease extent and response to treatment [34,35].
In a small study by Mostard et al., more than 90% of patients with fibrotic lesions (Scadding stage IV) still had active inflammatory disease as measured by FDG-PET [36]. Additional studies are needed to further confirm the utility of PET imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in sarcoidosis [37].

6. Confirmation of the Diagnosis

6.1. Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

Because of the high prevalence of pulmonary involvement, bronchoscopy, with its ancillary sampling techniques, has the highest diagnostic yield in sarcoidosis, unless more easily accessible biopsy sites, such as skin or superficial lymph nodes, are available [38]. Bronchoscopy may reveal a cobblestone appearance of the mucosa—the typical feature of endobronchial granulomatous inflammation. In such cases, the diagnostic yield of endobronchial biopsy is >70%, but it is only about 30% if the airway mucosa appears normal (Table 1) [39].

6.2. Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Although the main role of BAL in sarcoidosis is to exclude alternative diagnoses, such as, among others, infection and malignancy, it may also provide supportive evidence for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, provided BAL data are interpreted in the context of clinical and radiological features. An increased cellular count with a lymphocytosis > 25% and an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio are common findings, though they are neither sensitive nor specific for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Indeed, the BAL cell count may be normal in approximately 15% of newly diagnosed cases [40]. However, a CD4/CD8 ratio > 3.5 has a specificity of 93–96%, although with a sensitivity of 53 to 59% and a CD4/CD8 ratio > 10 has a >99% specificity for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis [41]. Additional features suggestive of a diagnosis of sarcoidosis include a lymphocytosis > 15%, CD4/CD8 ratio > 3.5, CD103 ratio of <0.2 and a transbronchial biopsy demonstrating noncaseating granulomas, whereas a CD4/CD8 ratio < 1 and elevated neutrophil and eosinophil counts make the diagnosis of sarcoidosis unlikely [41,42,43]. Patients with severe and progressive disease may show increased BAL neutrophils, which portend a poor response to immunosuppressive therapy [44].

6.3. EBUS-TBNA

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy is the most common manifestation of sarcoidosis across all ethnic groups [29], and different techniques can be used to sample the mediastinum, including endobronchial ultrasound with real-time guided transbronchial needle aspiration [EBUS-TBNA], transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration [EUS-TBNA] and endoscopic ultrasound bronchoscope guided fine-needle aspiration [EUS-b-FNA]. In particular, EBUS-TBNA can safely sample virtually any nodes in contact with the large airways and, when coupled with cytologic evaluation, has a consistently high success rate in diagnosing sarcoidosis [45,46], particularly in stage I and stage II disease [47]. Indeed, its diagnostic yield in stage I disease is 84% (95% CI, 74–92%) compared with 77% (95% CI, 64–86%) in stage II. In patients with hilar and/or mediastinal adenopathy, EUS-TBNA performs better than EBUS-TBNA, with a diagnostic yield of 88% (95% CI, 80–93%) vs. 66% (95% CI, 53–77%) [48]. However, EBUS-TBNA gives better access to the lymph nodes commonly involved in sarcoidosis than EUS–FNA [37,49]. Importantly, endosonography may help differentiating sarcoidosis from an adenopathy of a different nature, such as tuberculosis, based on sonographic features (i.e., the presence of heterogeneous echotexture in B-mode or necrosis in intrathoracic lymph nodes in a patient with positive tuberculin skin test (TST), especially in countries with high tuberculosis burden, may support a diagnosis of tuberculosis rather than sarcoidosis) [50]. In patients with suspected sarcoidosis, it is recommended to sample more than one nodal station. Indeed, the sampling of two lymph node stations versus one was significantly associated with the likelihood of a positive needle aspirate or biopsy sample [51]; the best success rates were obtained with aspirates or biopsies performed in the right paratracheal and subcarinal areas.

6.4. Transbronchial Lung Biopsy (TBLB)

Transbronchial Lung Biopsy (TBLB) has a relatively high diagnostic yield (50 to 75%) in patients with suspected sarcoidosis based on bilateral hilar adenopathy or compatible lung parenchymal abnormalities on HRCT. Conversely, in patients with stage I disease, the diagnostic accuracy of TBLB is suboptimal (12–66%), at least when four to five biopsies per patient are obtained [52]. When coupled with EBUS-TBNA, the diagnostic yield of TBLB (versus TBLB alone) increases from 82% to about 93% [53,54]. The parenchymal areas to sample should be chosen based on CT findings, avoiding areas with significant architectural distortion and, in cases with mild radiological abnormalities, the right lower lobe segments [54]. TBLB is generally a safe procedure, although bleeding and pneumothorax are uncommon but well-established complications [55]. The diagnostic yield of TBLB positively correlates with the number and size of samples obtained; the highest success rates are achieved when 8–10 biopsies are obtained [56], but such a high number of biopsies is seldom obtained in clinical practice. EBUS-TBNA is the preferred technique in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected stage I sarcoidosis. However, in order to obtain the highest success rate in the detection of granulomas, EBUS-TBNA needs to be combined with TBLB [53]. Recent data suggest that transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) may be useful in cases without significant lymphadenopathy and parenchymal abnormalities and in atypical cases when other sampling techniques are inconclusive, thus avoiding surgical lung biopsy [57]. However, more data are needed to clarify the role of TBLC in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected sarcoidosis.

6.5. Mediastinoscopy

If less invasive tests are not diagnostic or inconclusive, the next steps to sample the mediastinal lymph nodes are mediastinoscopy [58], and, in highly selected cases, thoracotomy (open or video-assisted thoracoscopy). However, surgical procedures are invasive, expensive and associated with longer hospital stays and significant morbidity, with prolonged air leakage being the most common postoperative complication. The benefits of lung biopsy to secure a histological diagnosis of sarcoidosis remain controversial, and many clinicians are reluctant to suggest surgical procedures to their patients due the non-negligible operative risks. In cases that remain undiagnosed following less invasive procedures and in the presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy, mediastinoscopy should be the preferred sampling modality [59].

6.6. Serological Biomarkers

As with other interstitial lung diseases, diagnostic, prognostic and theragnostic biomarkers are also lacking in sarcoidosis. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and the soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) are the most widely used biomarkers in sarcoidosis, though with suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. ACE is produced by the epithelioid cells within the sarcoid granuloma, and high levels of serum ACE are believed to reflect the burden of granulomatous inflammation [63,64]. However, elevated ACE levels may also be found in other granulomatous disorders such as chronic beryllium disease (CBD) or leprosy, as well as in liver disease, lymphoma, diabetes and hyperthyroidism [65]. In addition, ACE inhibitors, which are widely used antihypertensive drugs, reduce serum ACE level, thus leading to false negative values [66]. Furthermore, an insertion/deletion polymorphism within the ACE gene is known to affect plasma ACE levels [67]. Therefore, the value of ACE levels as diagnostic or prognostic tool remains a matter of debate.
sIL-2R is released by activated mononuclear cells and sIL2R levels correlate with disease activity, particularly in patients with extrapulmonary disease. In addition, sIL2R is more sensitive than serum ACE and lysozyme levels for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis [68], although sIL-2R levels can also be elevated in hematologic malignancy, autoimmune disorders and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [69]. A more recent study in patients with suspected sarcoidosis demonstrated a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 85% [70]. This indicates that sIL-2R can be a useful tool in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis when combined with imaging and clinical features.
To date, neither ACE nor sIL2R measurement are recommended as routine tests in the diagnostic work-up, initial assessment or follow up of patients with sarcoidosis [4].

7. Differential Diagnosis

Due to the lack of a diagnostic gold standard and the absence of a specific aetiology, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis remains one of exclusion [37]. In addition, granulomatous inflammation is the histologic hallmark of a number of conditions, including bacterial, mycobacterial and fungal infection, and occupational lung diseases such as chronic beryllium disease and silicosis. Occasionally, granulomatous inflammation may result from an immunological response against neoplastic antigens or drugs (Table 2).

7.1. Tuberculosis and Other Infectious Diseases

Infection, particularly tuberculosis (TB), is always in the differential diagnosis of patients suspected of having sarcoidosis. In countries where TB is endemic, differentiating between the two may be challenging, although a number of differences can also be appreciated. Unlike sarcoidosis, TB is characterized by the presence of a necrotizing granuloma in affected organs and cultures positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is important to state, however, that both features may be absent. In such cases, a positive Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) or tuberculin skin test (TST) associated with a positive PCR on clinical specimens generally suggest the correct diagnosis [71]. Rarely (<1% of cases), sarcoidosis may mimic miliary TB, with diffuse micronodules randomly disseminated in both lungs [72]. Of note, a multicentre study by Wang and colleagues revealed that TB patients are at higher risk of developing sarcoidosis compared to non-TB subjects [73]. Other infectious diseases such as histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, brucellosis and nocardiosis can also mimic sarcoidosis. In these cases, where other microbiological causes than TB are suspected, blood tests, bronchoalveolar, hematological and urine cultures could be useful for a correct diagnosis.

7.2. Occupational and Environmental Exposure: Chronic Beryllium Disease and Silicosis

Clinical, radiological and histological features of CBD are virtually indistinguishable from those of sarcoidosis [74]. Indeed, CBD is commonly referred to as “sarcoidosis of known cause”. Beryllium, a metal that is used in gears and cogs particularly in the aviation industry, can be extremely harmful if inhaled. The clinical course of CBD is highly variable, with approximately one-third of patients developing a progressive decline in lung function to end-stage lung disease [75]. The diagnosis of CBD requires a combination of confirmed beryllium sensitization (i.e., two or more positive beryllium lymphocyte proliferation assays (BeLPTs), ideally on BAL cells) along with pathological evidence of granulomatous inflammation [76].
Silicosis represents a spectrum of pulmonary diseases (Figure 2) caused by the inhalation of free crystalline silicon dioxide (silica). The diagnosis of silicosis requires a history of silica exposure that is sufficient to cause the disease, compatible radiographic (usually a conventional chest radiograph) abnormalities and the exclusion of other illnesses that can mimic silicosis [74]. Enlarged hilar lymph nodes, a common finding in silicosis, tend to calcify circumferentially in 5 to 10% of cases, producing the so-called eggshell pattern of calcification [77]. The link between silica and sarcoidosis is interesting, since previous retrospective studies demonstrated a higher risk of sarcoidosis in workers with occupational silica exposure [78,79]. In one case report, a confirmed exposure to silica together with immunological sensitization to silica was described in a patient diagnosed with sarcoidosis [80]. Therefore, as highlighted by the recent British Thoracic Society (BTS) clinical guideline on sarcoidosis, it is important to take an accurate exposure and occupational history to exclude conditions such as berylliosis or silicosis [81].

7.3. Lymphoma, Cancer and Drug: The Sarcoid-like Reaction

Non-necrotizing granulomas may be seen in a number of settings, including malignancy, drug toxicity and following medical device implantation [82]. The presence of (isolated) non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in patients otherwise not meeting clinical/radiological criteria for sarcoidosis is referred to as a sarcoid-like reaction (SLR). The prevalence of SLRs (Figure 2) is about 4% in patients with solid neoplasm and 14% and 7% in patients with Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively [83]. Notably, Murthi and colleagues have recently reported that the presence of SLRs is associated with a reduced number of metastases and better survival [84], although the mechanisms underlying the “protective” effect of SLRs are unclear. SLRs are generally observed in lymph nodes near solid tumors or occasionally in more distant sites such as the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. [85] SLRs can also occur following antineoplastic treatment, including Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for bladder cancer [86], anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) [87], anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L 1) [88,89] and nivolumab [90]. In this setting, SLRs are referred to as Drug Induced Sarcoid-Like Reactions (DISR) [91]. Other therapies that can induce SLRs include antiretroviral drugs, adalimumab [92] and infliximab [93], which, paradoxically, are also potential therapies for sarcoidosis. The exact immunopathogenesis of DISR is currently unknown. Finally, SLRs have been reported near silicone breast implants and following joint replacement [94] and body piercing [95].

7.4. Common Variable Immunodeficiency

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), the most common primary immunodeficiency disorder, is a syndrome characterized by low serum antibody levels, poor antibody response and recurrent bacterial infection [96]. CVID is one of the most common forms of immunodeficiency in adults and is rare in children, where other forms may be more frequent. CVID may manifest as granulomatous disease, which may be difficult to distinguish from sarcoidosis, particularly when granulomatous inflammation is widespread and precedes the onset of the immune deficiency [97]. On CT, CVID is characterized by the presence of ill-defined (either centrilobular or randomly distributed) nodules with a mid-lower lobe predominance, although well-defined nodules with a perilymphatic distribution as well as hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy have also been reported [28]. Similar to sarcoidosis, a histological examination of CVID lesions reveals non-necrotizing granulomas, although the presence of areas of organizing pneumonia and follicular bronchiolitis, both uncommon in sarcoidosis, may help in distinguishing the two conditions. Low serum immunoglobulin levels along with a history of recurrent infection strongly favor a diagnosis of CVID over sarcoidosis.

7.5. Autoimmune Disorders

Due to the heterogenic presentation, sarcoidosis must be careful to also be distinguished from rheumatologic disorders and vasculitis. At presentation, many patients with sarcoidosis could present symptoms similar to autoimmune diseases such as arthralgia/arthritis, parotitis, weight loss, cutaneous lesions, asthenia and fever [2]. Laboratory tests (antinuclear antibodies (ANA); antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA); anticitrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA); rheumatoid factor (FR); and others), radiological imaging and histological studies are necessary for a correct diagnosis [98]. However, in a study conducted by Wu C.H. in 1237 sarcoidosis patients, 17.6% presented an overlap syndrome with another autoimmune or inflammatory diseases [99].
Finally, the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern could be present in pulmonary fibrotic sarcoidosis, ILD associated with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic scleroderma [31,100].

8. Conclusions

Sarcoidosis is an uncommon disorder of unknown aetiology that can mimic a multitude of other diseases. The diagnosis remains one of exclusion and requires compatible clinical and radiological features together with the evidence of (non-necrotizing) granulomatous inflammation at disease sites, with the exception of some well-defined clinical manifestations such as Löfgren’s syndrome, Heerfordt’s syndromes and lupus pernio. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis may be challenging even for experienced clinicians because multiple other granulomatous disorders can mimic sarcoidosis and need to be excluded. Higher-quality evidence is urgently needed to guide clinical practice with regard to the diagnosis and detection of sarcoidosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S.; data curation: P.S., E.B. and M.V.; methodology, P.S.; investigation, N.B., S.P. and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B., S.P. and P.S.; writing—review and editing, S.P., M.V., E.B. and E.C.; supervision, P.S. and M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent has been obtained from all patients to publish this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grunewald, J.; Spagnolo, P.; Wahlström, J.; Eklund, A. Immunogenetics of disease-causing inflammation in Sarcoidosis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2015, 49, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. American Thoracic Society. Statement on sarcoidosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 160, 736–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Grunewald, J.; Grutters, J.C.; Arkema, E.V.; Saketkoo, L.A.; Moller, D.R.; Müller-Quernheim, J. Sarcoidosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Crouser, E.D.; Maier, L.A.; Wilson, K.C.; Bonham, C.A.; Morgenthau, A.S.; Patterson, K.C.; Abston, E.; Bernstein, R.C.; Blankstein, R.; Chen, E.S.; et al. Diagnosis and detection of Sarcoidosis. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, e26–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Neville, E.; Walker, A.N.; James, D.G. Prognostic factors predicting the outcome of Sarcoidosis: An analysis of 818 patients. Q. J. Med. 1983, 52, 525–533. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerke, A.K.; Judson, M.A.; Cozier, Y.C.; Culver, D.A.; Koth, L.L. Disease burden and variability in Sarcoidosis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017, 14, S421–S428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gerke, A.K. Morbidity and mortality in Sarcoidosis. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2014, 20, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Baughman, R.P.; Barriuso, R.; Beyer, K.; Boyd, J.; Hochreiter, J.; Knoet, C.; Martone, F.; Quadder, B.; Richardson, J.; Spitzer, G.; et al. Sarcoidosis: Patient treatment priorities. ERJ Open Res. 2018, 4, 00141-2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Baughman, R.P.; Judson, M.A.; Wells, A. The indications for the treatment of Sarcoidosis: Wells law. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2017, 34, 280–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thomeer, M.J.; Costabel, U.; Rizzato, G.; Poletti, V.; Demedts, M. Comparison of registries of interstitial lung diseases in three European countries. Eur. Respir. J. 2001, 18, 114s–118s. [Google Scholar]
  11. Newman, L.S.; Rose, C.S.; Maier, L.A. Sarcoidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1224–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arkema, E.V.; Cozier, Y.C. Epidemiology of Sarcoidosis: Current findings and future directions. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2018, 9, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jamilloux, Y.; Bonnefoy, M.; Valeyre, D.; Varron, L.; Broussolle, C.; Seve, P. Elderly-onset Sarcoidosis: Prevalence, clinical course, and treatment. Drugs Aging 2013, 30, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Baughman, R.P.; Teirstein, A.S.; Judson, M.; Rossman, M.D.; Yeager, H.; Bresnitz, E.A.; DePalo, L.; Hunninghake, G.W.; Iannuzzi, M.C.; Johns, C.J.; et al. Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of Sarcoidosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 1885–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Polverino, F.; Balestro, E.; Spagnolo, P. Clinical presentations, pathogenesis, and therapy of Sarcoidosis: State of the art. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lacomis, D. Neurosarcoidosis. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2011, 9, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trivieri, M.G.; Spagnolo, P.; Birnie, D.; Liu, P.; Drake, W.; Kovacic, J.C.; Baughman, R.; Fayad, Z.A.; Judson, M.A. Challenges in Cardiac and Pulmonary Sarcoidosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 1878–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Judson, M.A. Small fiber neuropathy in sarcoidosis: Something beneath the surface. Respir. Med. 2011, 105, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Voortman, M.; Hendriks, C.M.R.; Elfferich, M.D.P.; Bonella, F.; Møller, J.; De Vries, J.; Costabel, U.; Drent, M. The Burden of Sarcoidosis symptoms from a patient perspective. Lung 2019, 197, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mañá, J.; Gómez-Vaquero, C.; Montero, A.; Salazar, A.; Marcoval, J.; Valverde, J.; Manresa, F.; Pujol, R. Löfgren’s syndrome revisited: A study of 186 patients. Am. J. Med. 1999, 107, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dua, A.; Manadan, A. Heerfordt’s syndrome, or uveoparotid fever. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Danila, E.; Jurgauskienė, L.; Malickaite, R. BAL fluid cells and pulmonary function in different radiographic stages of newly diagnosed sarcoidosi. Adv. Med. Sci. 2008, 53, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Calaras, D.; Munteanu, O.; Scaletchi, V.; Simionica, I.; Botnaru, V. Ventilatory disturbances in patients with intrathoracic Sarcoidosis—A study from a functional and histological perspective. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffuse Lung Dis. 2017, 34, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lynch, J.P.; Kazerooni, E.A.; Gay, S.E. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis. Clin. Chest Med. 1997, 18, 755–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Scadding, J.G. Prognosis of intrathoracic Sarcoidosis in England. A review of 136 cases after five years’ observation. Br. Med. J. 1961, 2, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Miller, B.H.; Rosado-De-Christenson, M.L.; McAdams, H.P.; Fishback, N.F. Thoracic sarcoidosis: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1995, 15, 421–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Judson, M.A. Sarcoidosis: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and approach to treatment. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2008, 335, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Spagnolo, P.; Sverzellati, N.; Wells, A.U.; Hansell, D.M. Imaging aspects of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Eur. Radiol. 2014, 24, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Criado, E.; Sánchez, M.; Ramirez, J.; Arguis, P.; De Caralt, T.M.; Perea, R.J.; Xaubet, A. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Typical and atypical manifestations at high-resolution CT with pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2010, 30, 1567–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lynch, J.P.; Ma, Y.L.; Koss, M.N.; White, E. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 28, 053–074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Patterson, K.C.; Strek, M.E. Pulmonary Fibrosis in Sarcoidosis. Clinical features and outcomes. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2013, 10, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Abehsera, M.; Valeyre, D.; Grenier, P.; Jaillet, H.; Battesti, J.P.; Brauner, M.W. Sarcoidosis with pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 174, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Valeyre, D.; Nunes, H.; Bernaudin, J.-F. Advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2014, 20, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Keijsers, R.G.; Grutters, J.C. In which patients with Sarcoidosis is FDG PET/CT indicated? J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Maccarone, M.T. FDG-PET scan in Sarcoidosis: Clinical and imaging indications. Curr. Med. Imaging 2018, 15, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mostard, R.; Vöö, S.; van Kroonenburgh, M.; Verschakelen, J.; Wijnen, P.; Nelemans, P.; Erckens, R.; Drent, M. Inflammatory activity assessment by F18 FDG-PET/CT in persistent symptomatic sarcoidosis. Respir. Med. 2011, 105, 1917–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Soussan, M.; Augier, A.; Brillet, P.-Y.; Weinmann, P.; Valeyre, D. Functional imaging in extrapulmonary Sarcoidosis. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, e146–e159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Trisolini, R.; Baughman, R.P.; Spagnolo, P.; Culver, D.A. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in sarcoidosis: Beyond the diagnostic yield. Respirology 2019, 24, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shorr, A.F.; Torrington, K.G.; Hnatiuk, O.W. Endobronchial biopsy for Sarcoidosis. Chest 2001, 120, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Danila, E.; Jurgauskienė, L.; Norkūnienė, J.; Malickaitė, R. BAL fluid cells in newly diagnosed pulmonary sarcoidosis with different clinical activity. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2009, 114, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Winterbauer, R.H.; Lammert, J.; Sellami, M.; Wu, R.; Corley, D.; Springmeyer, S.C. Bronchoalveolar lavage cell populations in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis. Chest 1993, 104, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Welker, L.; Jörres, R.; Costabel, U.; Magnussen, H. Predictive value of BAL cell differentials in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. Eur. Respir. J. 2004, 24, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Heron, M.; Slieker, W.A.; Zanen, P.; Van Lochem, E.G.; Hooijkaas, H.; Bosch, J.M.V.D.; Van Velzen-Blad, H. Evaluation of CD103 as a cellular marker for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis. Clin. Immunol. 2008, 126, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Drent, M.; Jacobs, J.A.; De Vries, J.; Lamers, R.J.S.; Liem, I.H.; Wouters, E.F.M. Does the cellular bronchoalveolar lavage fluid profile reflect the severity of sarcoidosis? Eur. Respir. J. 1999, 13, 1338–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chee, A.; Khalil, M.; Stather, D.R.; MacEachern, P.; Field, S.; Tremblay, A. Cytologic assessment of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirates in Sarcoidosis. J. Bronc.-Interv. Pulmonol. 2012, 19, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kitamura, A.; Takiguchi, Y.; Kurosu, K.; Takigawa, N.; Saegusa, F.; Hiroshima, K.; Nakajima, T.; Tanabe, N.; Nakatani, Y.; Yoshino, I.; et al. Feasibility of cytological diagnosis of sarcoidosis with endobronchial US-guided transbronchial aspiration. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Llung Dis. Off. J. WASOG 2012, 29, 82–89. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yasufuku, K.; Chiyo, M.; Sekine, Y.; Chhajed, P.N.; Shibuya, K.; Iizasa, T.; Fujisawa, T. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Chest 2004, 126, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Von Bartheld, M.B.; Dekkers, O.; Szlubowski, A.; Eberhardt, R.; Herth, F.; Veen, J.C.C.M.I.; De Jong, Y.P.; van der Heijden, E.; Tournoy, K.G.; Claussen, M.; et al. Endosonography vs. conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis. JAMA 2013, 309, 2457–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Spagnolo, P.; Rossi, G.; Trisolini, R.; Sverzellati, N.; Baughman, R.P.; Wells, A.U. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018, 6, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dhooria, S.; Agarwal, R.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Bal, A.; Gupta, N.; Gupta, D. Differentiating tuberculosis from sarcoidosis by sonographic characteristics of lymph nodes on endobronchial ultrasonography: A study of 165 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014, 148, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Trisolini, R.; Tinelli, C.; Cancellieri, A.; Paioli, D.; Alifano, M.; Boaron, M.; Patelli, M. Transbronchial needle aspiration in Sarcoidosis: Yield and predictors of a positive aspirate. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008, 135, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Agarwal, R.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Gupta, D. Efficacy and safety of conventional TBNA in Sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir. Care 2012, 58, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gupta, D.; Dadhwal, D.S.; Agarwal, R.; Gupta, N.; Bal, A.; Aggarwal, A.N. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration vs conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis. Chest 2014, 146, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Navani, N.; Booth, H.L.; Kocjan, G.; Falzon, M.; Capitanio, A.; Brown, J.M.; Porter, J.C.; Janes, S.M. Combination of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with standard bronchoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of stage I and stage II pulmonary sarcoidosis. Respirology 2011, 16, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sehgal, I.S.; Bal, A.; Dhooria, S.; Gupta, N.; Ram, B.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Behera, D.; Agarwal, R. Predictors of successful yield of transbronchial lung biopsy in patients with Sarcoidosis. J. Bronc.-Interv. Pulmonol. 2018, 25, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Plit, M.; Pearson, R.; Havryk, A.; Da Costa, J.; Chang, C.; Glanville, A.R. Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with transbronchial and endobronchial biopsy for suspected sarcoidosis. Intern. Med. J. 2012, 42, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jacob, M.; Bastos, H.N.; Mota, P.C.; Melo, N.; Cunha, R.; Pereira, J.M.; Guimarães, S.; Moura, C.S.; Morais, A. Diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy in Sarcoidosis. ERJ Open Res. 2019, 5, 00203-2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Mikhail, J.R.; Shepherd, M.; Mitchell, D.N. Mediastinal lymph node biopsy in Sarcoidosis. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 1979, 11, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Reich, J.M.; Brouns, M.C.; O’Connor, E.A.; Edwards, M.J. Mediastinoscopy in patients with presumptive stage I Sarcoidosis. Chest 1998, 113, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Oki, M.; Saka, H.; Kitagawa, C.; Kogure, Y.; Murata, N.; Ichihara, S.; Moritani, S. Prospective study of endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes versus transbronchial lung biopsy of lung tissue for diagnosis of sarcoidosis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012, 143, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Costabel, U.; Bonella, F.; Ohshimo, S.; Guzman, J. Diagnostic modalities in Sarcoidosis: BAL, EBUS, and PET. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 31, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akyil, F.T.; Agca, M.; Ozturk, H.; Sonkaya, E.; Erdem, I.; Bulbul, E.U.; Ozbaki, F.; Yildiz, R.; Bekir, S.A.; Sevim, T. Correlation between the diagnostic yield from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis and clinicoradiological findings in Sarcoidosis. Turk. Thorac. J. 2020, 21, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sheffield, E.A. Pathology of Sarcoidosis. Clin. Chest Med. 1997, 18, 741–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kraaijvanger, R.; Janssen Bonás, M.; Vorselaars, A.D.M.; Veltkamp, M. Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sarcoidosis: Current Use and Future Prospects. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Allen, R.K. A review of angiotensin converting enzyme in health and disease. Sarcoidosis 1991, 8, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Studdy, P.R.; Lapworth, R.; Bird, R. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and its clinical significance—A review. J. Clin. Pathol. 1983, 36, 938–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Rigat, B.; Hubert, C.; Alhenc-Gelas, F.; Cambien, F.; Corvol, P.; Soubrier, F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 86, 1343–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Nguyen, C.; Kambe, N.; Kishimoto, I.; Ueda-Hayakawa, I.; Okamoto, H. Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor level is more sensitive than angiotensin-converting enzyme or lysozyme for diagnosis of sarcoidosis and may be a marker of multiple organ involvement. J. Dermatol. 2017, 44, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Schimmelpennink, M.; Quanjel, M.; Vorselaars, A.; Wiertz, I.; Veltkamp, M.; Van Moorsel, C.; Grutters, J. Value of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in sarcoidosis. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2020, 14, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Eurelings, L.E.M.; Miedema, J.R.; Dalm, V.A.S.H.; Van Daele, P.L.A.; Van Hagen, P.M.; Van Laar, J.A.M.; Dik, W.A. Sensitivity and specificity of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor for diagnosing sarcoidosis in a population of patients suspected of sarcoidosis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Narula, N.; Iannuzzi, M. Sarcoidosis: Pitfalls and challenging mimickers. Front. Med. 2021, 7, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rajagopala, S.; Sankari, S.; Kancherla, R.; Ramanathan, R.P.; Balalakshmoji, D. Miliary Sarcoidosis: Does it exist? A case series and systematic review of literature. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2020, 37, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, S.; Chung, C.; Huang, T.; Tsai, W.; Peng, C.; Huang, K.; Perng, W.; Chian, C.; Chien, W.; Shen, C. Bidirectional association between tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Respirology 2019, 24, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Muller-Quernheim, J.; Gaede, K.I.; Fireman, E.; Zissel, G. Diagnoses of chronic beryllium disease within cohorts of sarcoidosis patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 27, 1190–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Newman, L.S.; Mroz, M.M.; Balkissoon, R.; Maier, L.A. Beryllium sensitization progresses to chronic Beryllium disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 171, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Barna, B.P.; Culver, D.A.; Yen-Lieberman, B.; Dweik, R.A.; Thomassen, M.J. Clinical application of Beryllium lymphocyte proliferation testing. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2003, 10, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Marchiori, E.; Ferreira, A.; Saez, F.; Gabetto, J.M.; Souza, A.S.; Escuissato, D.L.; Gasparetto, E.L. Conglomerated masses of silicosis in sandblasters: High-resolution CT findings. Eur. J. Radiol. 2006, 59, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rafnsson, V.; Ingimarsson, O.; Hjalmarsson, I.; Gunnarsdottir, H. Association between exposure to crystalline silica and risk of sarcoidosis. Occup. Environ. Med. 1998, 55, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vihlborg, P.; Bryngelsson, I.-L.; Andersson, L.; Graff, P. Risk of sarcoidosis and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis from occupational silica exposure in Swedish iron foundries: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e016839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Beijer, E.; Meek, B.; Kromhout, H.; Van Es, H.W.; Seldenrijk, K.; Drent, M.; Rooijackers, J.M.; Veltkamp, M. Sarcoidosis in a patient clinically diagnosed with silicosis; is silica associated sarcoidosis a new phenotype? Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2019, 28, 100906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Thillai, M.; Atkins, C.P.; Crawshaw, A.; Hart, S.P.; Ho, L.-P.; Kouranos, V.; Patterson, K.C.; Screaton, N.J.; Whight, J.; Wells, A.U. BTS clinical statement on pulmonary Sarcoidosis. Thorax 2020, 76, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pastré, J.; Bouvry, D.; Juvin, K.; Benattia, A.; Annesi-Maesano, I.; Valeyre, D.; Nunes, H.; Israël-Biet, D. Sarcoidosis-like cancer-associated granulomatosis: Characteristics and a case-control comparison with Sarcoidosis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Brincker, H. Sarcoid reactions in malignant tumours. Cancer Treat. Rev. 1986, 13, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Murthi, M.; Yoshioka, K.; Cho, J.H.; Arias, S.; Danna, E.; Zaw, M.; Holt, G.; Tatsumi, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Mirsaeidi, M. Presence of concurrent sarcoid-like granulomas indicates better survival in cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study. ERJ Open Res. 2020, 6, 00061–02020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Aubart, F.C.; Lhote, R.; Amoura, A.; Valeyre, D.; Haroche, J.; Amoura, Z.; Lebrun-Vignes, B. Drug-induced sarcoidosis: An overview of the WHO pharmacovigilance database. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 288, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Agrawal, A.; Sahni, S.; Vulisha, A.K.; Gumpeni, R.; Shah, R.; Talwar, A. Pulmonary manifestations of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Respir. Med. 2017, 128, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Rubio-Rivas, M.; Moreira, C.; Marcoval, J. Sarcoidosis related to checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Keukeleire, S.D.; Schwarze, J.; Awada, G.; Everaert, H.; Van Binst, A.M.; Cras, L.; Neyns, B.; Aspeslagh, S. An atypical Sarcoid-like reaction during anti-protein death 1 treatment in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2020, 30, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Yousuf, H.; Mekki, R.; Khan, K.; Hussain, A. Pembrolizumab-induced Sarcoid-like reaction in a patient with lung cancer. Cureus 2020, 12, e12395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Danlos, F.-X.; Pagès, C.; Baroudjian, B.; Vercellino, L.; Battistella, M.; Mimoun, M.; Jebali, M.; Bagot, M.; Tazi, A.; Lebbé, C. Nivolumab-induced Sarcoid-like granulomatous reaction in a patient with advanced melanoma. Chest 2016, 149, e133–e136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chopra, A.; Nautiyal, A.; Kalkanis, A.; Judson, M.A. Drug-induced Sarcoidosis-like reactions. Chest 2018, 154, 664–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bhargava, S.; Perlman, D.; Allen, T.; Ritter, J.; Bhargava, M. Adalimumab induced pulmonary sarcoid reaction. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2013, 10, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Gîlcă, G.-E.; Diaconescu, S.; Bălan, G.G.; Timofte, O.; Ştefănescu, G. Sarcoidosis associated with infliximab therapy in ulcerative colitis: A case report. Medicine 2017, 96, e6156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ricciardi, B.F.; Nocon, A.A.; Jerabek, S.A.; Wilner, G.; Kaplowitz, E.; Goldring, S.R.; Purdue, P.E.; Perino, G. Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: A study of 285 cases. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2016, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Ng, K.H.; Siar, C.H.; Ganesapillai, T. Sarcoid-like foreign body reaction in body piercing. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontology 1997, 84, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Patuzzo, G.; Barbieri, A.; Tinazzi, E.; Veneri, D.; Argentino, G.; Moretta, F.; Puccetti, A.; Lunardi, C. Autoimmunity and infection in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Park, J.H.; Levinson, A.I. Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Clin. Immunol. 2010, 134, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Korsten, P.; Tampe, B.; Konig, M.F.; Nikiphorou, E. Sarcoidosis and autoimmune diseases: Differences, similarities and overlaps. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2018, 24, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wu, C.-H.; Chung, P.-I.; Wu, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-T.; Chiu, Y.-W.; Chang, Y.-T.; Liu, H.-N. Comorbid autoimmune diseases in patients with sarcoidosis: A nationwide case-control study in Taiwan. J. Dermatol. 2016, 44, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chung, J.H.; Cox, C.W.; Montner, S.M.; Adegunsoye, A.; Oldham, J.M.; Husain, A.N.; Vij, R.; Noth, I.; Lynch, D.A.; Strek, M.E. CT features of the usual interstitial Pneumonia pattern: Differentiating connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018, 210, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 11 01558 g001a 550Diagnostics 11 01558 g001b 550
Figure 1. Irregularly marginated nodule surrounded by multiple small nodules (“Galaxy sign”, yellow narrow), this is typical of sarcoidosis (a); ground-glass-like increased attenuation resulting from diffuse micronodules randomly distributed (“Miliary sarcoidosis”) (b); enlarged and partially calcified (yellow narrows) bilateral hilar lymph nodes (c); fibrotic sarcoidosis with cystic changes and traction bronchiectases (yellow narrows) predominantly in the perihilar region and upper lobes. Nodular abnormalities are minimal/absent, but the appearance and the location of the fibrosis are very suggestive of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis (d).
Figure 1. Irregularly marginated nodule surrounded by multiple small nodules (“Galaxy sign”, yellow narrow), this is typical of sarcoidosis (a); ground-glass-like increased attenuation resulting from diffuse micronodules randomly distributed (“Miliary sarcoidosis”) (b); enlarged and partially calcified (yellow narrows) bilateral hilar lymph nodes (c); fibrotic sarcoidosis with cystic changes and traction bronchiectases (yellow narrows) predominantly in the perihilar region and upper lobes. Nodular abnormalities are minimal/absent, but the appearance and the location of the fibrosis are very suggestive of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis (d).
Diagnostics 11 01558 g001aDiagnostics 11 01558 g001b
Diagnostics 11 01558 g002 550
Figure 2. Pulmonary silicosis with predominantly upper lobes fibrosis and traction bronchiectasis (yellow narrow) (a); conglomerate masses and pulmonary micronodules (yellow narrow) in patient with tuberculosis (b); enlarged bilateral hilar lymph nodes (yellow narrow), a sarcoid-like-reaction in patient with mammal carcinoma (c).
Figure 2. Pulmonary silicosis with predominantly upper lobes fibrosis and traction bronchiectasis (yellow narrow) (a); conglomerate masses and pulmonary micronodules (yellow narrow) in patient with tuberculosis (b); enlarged bilateral hilar lymph nodes (yellow narrow), a sarcoid-like-reaction in patient with mammal carcinoma (c).
Diagnostics 11 01558 g002
Table
Table 1. Sensitivity and specificity of the main diagnostic procedures in suspicion of pulmonary sarcoidosis.
Table 1. Sensitivity and specificity of the main diagnostic procedures in suspicion of pulmonary sarcoidosis.
SensitivitySpecificityDiagnostic YieldReferences
EBB46.2%85.7%30–70%[39]
TBLB37%100%50–75%[52,60]
EBUS/TBNA83–93%100%77–84%[48,61]
Mediastinoscopy100%100%82–100%[58]
BAL (CD4/CD8 ≥ 3.5)53–59%93–96%56%[41,62]
EBUS/TBNA: endobronchial ultrasound with real-time guided transbronchial needle aspiration; EBB: endobronchial biopsy; TBLB: transbronchial lung biopsy; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage.
Table
Table 2. Main differential diagnoses of sarcoidosis.
Table 2. Main differential diagnoses of sarcoidosis.
SarcoidosisTuberculosisCBD and SilicosisSarcoid-like Reactions (SLRs)
Clinical presentationOften asymptomatic
May be an occasional diagnosis
Dry cough, dyspnea
Weight loss
Fever		Weight loss
Cough
Purulent sputum
Hemoptysis
Fever		Dry cough and dyspneaOften Asymptomatic
Exposure historyUndefinedRecent travel to endemic countries, contact with TB patientHistory of work/environment exposure to beryllium or silicaDrugs, malignancy or medical device implantation
Radiological findings
or localizations		Bilateral and symmetrical
hilar lymphadenopathy
Perilymphatic and peribronchovascular nodules
Cavitation (rare)		Hilar lymphadenopathy (often asymmetrical)
Cavitation (frequent)
Randomly distributed nodules		Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (CBD); lymph nodes may have an egg-shell appearance (silicosis)It depends on the underlying cause (i.e., lymph nodes
near solid tumors)
LaboratoryHypercalcemia and hypercalciuria
Elevated serum levels of ACE
Elevated levels of sIL-2R
Peripheral lymphopenia
Mantoux test: anergic		Mantoux test: positive
IGRA: positive
ACE levels may be elevated		Mantoux test: negative
ACE levels may be elevated		It depends on the underlying cause ACE may occasionally be elevated Mantoux test: negative
HistopathologyNonnecrotizing granulomasNecrotizing granulomasNonnecrotizing granulomas
Sclerotic nodules
Silica particles		Indistinguishable from sarcoid granulomas
Bronchoscopy and BALFLymphocytosis
CD4+/CD8+ ratio generally > 3.5		Culture positive for mycobacterium tuberculosisLymphocytosis
Positive BeLPT (CBD)		Variable based on the underlying cause
BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; ACE: angiotensin converting enzyme; CBD: chronic beryllium disease; BeLPT: beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test; IGRA: Interferon-gamma release assay; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bernardinello, N.; Petrarulo, S.; Balestro, E.; Cocconcelli, E.; Veltkamp, M.; Spagnolo, P. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091558

AMA Style

Bernardinello N, Petrarulo S, Balestro E, Cocconcelli E, Veltkamp M, Spagnolo P. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(9):1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bernardinello, Nicol, Simone Petrarulo, Elisabetta Balestro, Elisabetta Cocconcelli, Marcel Veltkamp, and Paolo Spagnolo. 2021. "Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis" Diagnostics 11, no. 9: 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop