Next Article in Journal
Alteration in Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Profile in Aged Patients with COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Weakly Supervised Ternary Stream Data Augmentation Fine-Grained Classification Network for Identifying Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Previous Article in Journal
The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generating Virtual Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) Images from T1- and T2-Weighted Images Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network in Spine Imaging
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Automated Final Lesion Segmentation in Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Deep Learning

Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1621; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091621
by Riaan Zoetmulder 1,2,3, Praneeta R. Konduri 1,2, Iris V. Obdeijn 1, Efstratios Gavves 3, Ivana IÅ¡gum 1,2,3, Charles B.L.M. Majoie 2, Diederik W.J. Dippel 4, Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos 5, Mayank Goyal 6,7, Peter J. Mitchell 8, Bruce C. V. Campbell 9, Demetrius K. Lopes 10, Gernot Reimann 11, Tudor G. Jovin 12, Jeffrey L. Saver 13, Keith W. Muir 14, Phil White 15,16, Serge Bracard 17, Bailiang Chen 18, Scott Brown 19, Wouter J. Schonewille 20, Erik van der Hoeven 21, Volker Puetz 22 and Henk A. Marquering 1,2,*add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1621; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091621
Submission received: 1 July 2021 / Revised: 25 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 4 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Diagnosis Using Deep Learning)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article developed by Riaan Zoetmulder et al. is well prepared/developed and can be accepted for publication. Methods and discussion are balanced for the message to be conveyed.
Correct the ERROR information at the bottom of page 6.

Decrease de size of Figure 2.

Edit all Tables based on MDPI rules.

Author Response

Thank you for your review. We apologize for these mistakes. We have processed your feedback; the size of Figure 2 has been decreased to fit the rest of the text, the error information has been corrected, and the tables have been edited based on MDPI rules.

Reviewer 2 Report

For measuring FLV, PCS was automatically segmented with CNN.

 

 

 

Major points

 

According to Table 2, dice coefficients are too low in four CNNs. This hinders the clinical application of authors’ CNN.

 

Compared with the ref 6, dice coefficients are low in the current study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476369/

 

“A lesion was defined as detected if the percentage of overlapping voxels between the automatic and reference segmentations was larger than a predefined threshold.” “To account for this issue the required percentage of overlapping voxels was set to either greater than zero percent or a more conservative 20%. “ The definition of predefined threshold is ambiguous in this paper.

 

Dice and ICC must be calculated for each case of test set between manual segmentations by two radiologists.

 

For FLV measurement, detection rate is not a primary metric.

 

Please cite the following papers for segmentation with transfer learning.

https://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.19.22347

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2021.694815/full

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/mrm.27969

 

“Error! Reference source not found” These must be edited.

 

Minor points

 

FLV and FU-NCCT must be defined precisely in main text.

 

“the input block” Size of input must be clarified in the section 2.4.

 

Please refer to Appendix in main text.

 

“33.    Yosinski, J.; Clune, J.; Bengio, Y.; Lipson, H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? 2014.” Journal name?

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

“The latter measure, lesion volume, is also clinically a more relevant measure than the spatial overlap.“ If so, results of Bland Altman plots shown in Figure 1 must be evaluated clinically. Is the difference of volume between ground truth and prediction acceptable clinically? Please discuss about Limits of Agreement of this study.

 

 

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop