Next Article in Journal
Correction: Visani et al. miR-196B-5P and miR-200B-3P Are Differentially Expressed in Medulloblastomas of Adults and Children. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 265
Next Article in Special Issue
AI-Enabled Algorithm for Automatic Classification of Sleep Disorders Based on Single-Lead Electrocardiogram
Previous Article in Journal
Intracoronary Thrombogenicity in Patients with Vasospastic Angina: An Observation Using Coronary Angioscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predicting Depression in Community Dwellers Using a Machine Learning Algorithm
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Machine Learning-Based Definition of Symptom Clusters and Selection of Antidepressants for Depressive Syndrome

Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1631; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091631
by Il Bin Kim 1,2 and Seon-Cheol Park 1,3,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1631; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091631
Submission received: 30 June 2021 / Revised: 3 September 2021 / Accepted: 3 September 2021 / Published: 7 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning and Big Data in Psychiatric and Sleep Disorders)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The  topic of this paper is timely and of great importance.

The paper is well written.

It is a kind of review, but it is apparently not a systematic review in the modern sense following precise rules , but a  kind of narrative review focussing predominantly on papers which seem of predominant interest for the authors. This should be described and explained.

Although it is not a systematic review, it would be welcomed by the readers to know how many papers on this specific topic  are published und how the search was made, e.g. a kind of PRISMA diagram (which is a typical essence of a systematic review).

At some place the advantage of the machine learning approach compared to traditional methods like multivariate analysis should be explained. If available informative empirical examples comparing both methods would  be helpful for the understanding.

The description of the selected papers are well-done.

Author Response

It is a kind of review, but it is apparently not a systematic review in the modern sense following precise rules, but a  kind of narrative review focussing predominantly on papers which seem of predominant interest for the authors. This should be described and explained.

  • According to the kind advice, we inserted the description that the review is not a systematic or comprehensive, but rather narrative. (page 6)

 

At some place the advantage of the machine learning approach compared to traditional methods like multivariate analysis should be explained. If available informative empirical examples comparing both methods would be helpful for the understanding.

  • According to the kind advice, we inserted the explanation paragraph for the comparison between the machine learning and traditional methods. (page 5)

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting review that highlights an important issue in psychiatry. The manuscript is well written, and the results are clearly presented. The Authors should better clarify the methods of the study selection. There are important studies on the argument that are missing such as "Pharmacogenomics-Driven Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A Machine-Learning Approach With Multi-trial Replication; Arjun P Athreya et al 2019”

Author Response

This is an interesting review that highlights an important issue in psychiatry. The manuscript is well written, and the results are clearly presented. The Authors should better clarify the methods of the study selection. There are important studies on the argument that are missing such as "Pharmacogenomics-Driven Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A Machine-Learning Approach With Multi-trial Replication; Arjun P Athreya et al 2019”

  • We appreciate the advice for the article inclusion in the revised manuscript. According to the advice, we included the article in the reference lists at number 8.
Back to TopTop