Next Article in Journal
Early Prediction and Monitoring of Treatment Response in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors by Means of Imaging: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Kinesthesia and Temporal Experience: On the ‘Knitting and Unknitting’ Process of Bodily Subjectivity in Schizophrenia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

A Case of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer, Positive for ALDH1A1, Which Arose from Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder

1
Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, 7-1 Kashima-cho, Gifu 500-8513, Japan
2
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, 7-1 Kashima-cho, Gifu 500-8513, Japan
3
Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(11), 2721; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112721
Submission received: 22 September 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
Adenomyomatosis (ADM) of the gallbladder is a condition characterized by the proliferation of Rokitansky–Aschoff sinus (RAS), in which the epithelium of the gallbladder extends into the muscular layer, causing a thickening of the gallbladder wall. Although ADM is generally considered not to be a precancerous lesion of gallbladder cancer, there are some reports of cases of gallbladder cancer from ADM. Therefore, the relationship between ADM and gallbladder cancer remains controversial. We herein report a case of early-stage gallbladder cancer, BilIN3 (high grade), arising from ADM that was positive for ALDH1A1, an important marker of stem cells and cancer stem cells.

1. Background

Adenomyomatosis (ADM) of the gallbladder is a condition characterized by the proliferation of Rokitansky–Aschoff sinus (RAS), in which the epithelium of the gallbladder extends into the muscular layer or its outer layer, causing a thickening of the gallbladder wall. It was first reported by Jutras [1] in 1960. However, the frequency of gallbladder cancer concomitants with ADM is reported to be 1.4–6.6% [2]. Whether or not ADM itself is a precancerous lesion is controversial.
Understanding the pathogenesis and carcinogenesis of gallbladder cancer is important. The fifth edition of the World Health Organization’s tumor classification of the digestive system indicates three types of preinvasive neoplasms of the gallbladder [3], including biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN), pyloric gland adenoma (PGA), and intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN) [4]. BilINs, which are classified into BilIN-1, BilIN-2, and BilIn-3, are microscopically recognizable as flat or micropapillary preinvasive neoplasms [3]. The increasing grades of biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) reflect the multistep carcinogenesis of gallbladder cancer/cholangiocarcinoma, with BilIN-3 representing the stage of carcinoma in situ [5]. Despite the well-defined morphological features in BilIN, the molecular alterations seen during early tumor progression in the biliary tract are poorly understood [6].
The human aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) superfamily comprising 19 isozymes poses important physiological and toxicological functions [7]. The ALDH1A subfamily is also known to play an important role in embryogenesis and development by mediating retinoic acid signaling [8]. The ALDH1A1 gene codes a cytoplasmic enzyme and exerts vital physiological and pathophysiological functions, playing important roles in various chronic diseases, including cancer [9]. ALDH1A1 can induce cancer development via the maintenance of cancer stem cell properties, the modification of the metabolism, and the promotion of DNA repair.
The expression of ALDH1A1, which acts as a tumor suppressor in certain cancers, is regulated by several epigenetic processes. Since the detoxification of ALDH1A1 often causes the failure of chemotherapy [9], ALDH1A1-targeted therapy has recently been widely used as a cancer chemotherapy [10], although the mechanism by which ALDH1A1 regulates carcinogenesis is not fully understood.
We herein report a surgically treated case of early-stage gallbladder cancer arising from ADM that was positive for ALDH1A1.

2. Case Presentation

  • History of present illness: a 78-year-old woman was referred to our department by her family doctor for further examination of a gallbladder polyp, with gallbladder wall thickening without any symptoms;
  • Medical history: she had type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperuricemia as comorbidities, each of which was treated with medication;
  • Social history: she had a history of smoking 10–15 cigarettes per day and drinking 60 g of alcohol per week;
  • Clinical chemistry: there were no abnormal findings in her clinical chemistry, including with regard to tumor markers;
  • Abdominal ultrasonography: a 7.4-mm stalked polyp on the gallbladder body and wall thickening of the fundus with aggregated multiple cystic structures was seen, suggesting RAS (Figure 1).
  • Contrast-enhanced CT: there were multiple cystic structures at the fundus of the gallbladder and no hyperenhancement of the gallbladder wall or nodules (Figure 2);
  • Contrast-enhanced MRI: there was a 4-mm gallbladder body polyp and no abnormal signals in the thickened wall at the fundus of the gallbladder (Figure 3);
    Based on these imaging findings, we diagnosed the patient with a gallbladder polyp and focal-type ADM;
    The patient chose surgical treatment, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. The gallbladder was easily dissected from the liver and was able to be removed laparoscopically as usual;
  • Pathological findings: macroscopically, the gallbladder showed a thickened wall containing cystic lesions, suggesting ADM (Figure 4a).
There were no macroscopic neoplastic lesions. Microscopically, there were multifocal cystic lesions with a cluster of large cysts contiguous to the RAS in the fundus of the thickened gallbladder wall (Figure 4b). Among the cystic lesions of varying sizes, the cysts lined with hyperplastic columnar cells (Figure 4c), and a small micropapillary epithelial lesion suggestive of BilIN-1 (low-grade) that was characterized by mild atypia, were noted (Figure 4d). In addition, three different-sized BilIN-3 (high-grade) lesions were present (Figure 4b-cricle/box,e,f) measuring 1 mm (one lesion) and 7 mm (two lesions) in diameter. The lesions showed micropapillary structures lined by atypical cells with hyperchromatic/irregular nuclei, with an increased N/C ratio, complex nuclear stratification, and loss of nuclear polarity (Figure 4b,f). Most of the cysts were covered with poorly atypical columnar-cubical epithelium similar to that of the bile duct or stomach. Immunohistochemically, the cytoplasm of the BillIN-3 lesions was strongly positive for ALDH1A1 (Figure 5a), but negative for S-100P (Figure 6a), SALL4 (Figure 6b), Oct 3/4 (Figure 6c), and glypican 3 (Figure 6d). Interestingly we observed the expression of ALDH1A1 in a few cells which lined in the RAS (Figure 5b), while the gallbladder normal epithelial cells did not express ALDH1A1 (Figure 5c). Nuclear-positive reaction against p53 was also observed in the BilIN-3 lesions (Figure 5d). The MIB-1-positive rate of the BilIN-3 lesions was 60%–70% (hot spot) (Figure 5e).

3. Discussion

ADM is a relatively common disease, reportedly found in 2.1–14% of cholecystectomy cases and 0.12–0.49% of medical checkups [11]. The association between ADM and gallbladder cancer is still inconclusive. Ootani et al. [12] reported that 12 cases (4.3%) of gallbladder cancer were found in 279 cases of ADM, all of which were a segmental type, suggesting an association between ADM and gallbladder cancer. Similarly, Nabatame et al. [13] reported a higher coexistence rate of gall bladder cancer in the segmental type of ADM than in other types, speculating that, in segmental ADM, the increase in the intra-gallbladder pressure and bile stasis may cause metaplastic changes in the gallbladder mucosa, resulting in gallbladder cancer development. In both of the aforementioned reports, ADM itself was considered to be an indirect precursor lesion for gallbladder cancer, not a direct cause of cancer.
Mori et al. [14] reported that the relationship between ADM and gallbladder cancer is not clear in their study of 11 cases of the segmental type of ADM complicated with gallbladder cancer, as there were no marked differences in the MIB-1 and p53 expression between the fundal and cervical sites of the segment, and more metaplastic changes were observed in the cervical site, where a low incidence of gallbladder cancer was reported. In contrast, there are several reports of gallbladder cancer arising from within RAS, as seen in these cases [15,16,17,18,19]. In particular, Anno et al. [15] reported that immunohistochemical staining showed that MIB-1 and MUC1 were expressed in the RAS but not in the gallbladder luminal epithelium, suggesting that the RAS itself may be a precursor lesion. In our case, the atypical epithelium was confined within the RAS, and there was no atypical epithelium in the gallbladder lumen or stroma. In addition, the ADM was localized mainly at the fundal side of the gallbladder, suggesting that the RAS itself was the origin of the cancer rather than the result of secondary carcinogenesis triggered by increased gallbladder pressure or bile stasis due to ADM.
In our patient, almost all atypical cells in the BilIN-3 lesions were immunohistochemically positive for ALDH1A1 (Figure 5a). In addition, a few cells in the RAS showed the positive reactivity of ALDH1A1, as shown in Figure 5b. These findings are of interest, as ALDH1A1 is known to play a vital role as a marker of stem cells and cancer stem cells [20]. This is the first report demonstrating that the cytoplasm of the cells in BilIN-3 lesions, as well as cells in RAS, is immunohistochemically positive for ALDH1A1. ALDH1A1 located in 9q21.13 encodes a homotetramer that is ubiquitously distributed in a variety of adult tissues [20]. ALDH1A1, an important member of the 19-member ALDH family, is able to metabolize reactive aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acid derivatives [7,20]. It further plays important physiological and toxicological roles in many areas, including cancer, embryogenesis, and development, by mediating retinoic acid signaling. The overexpression of ALDH1A1 is known to correlate with a poor prognosis and tumor aggressiveness. It is also associated with drug resistance in traditional chemotherapy for cancer [21]. Gallbladder cancer reportedly expresses ALDH1A1 to [22,23], suggesting that ALDH1A1 may be closely related to carcinogenesis in the gallbladder. We expect that the expression of ALDH1, p53, and MIB-1 will increase in number and intensity when BilIN is progressed.
In our case, the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer could not be made preoperatively, as ADM is mainly characterized by the thickening of the gallbladder wall in the imaging findings, and the focal type can be especially difficult to distinguish from gallbladder cancer [24]. While the heterogeneous wall contrast effect on contrast-enhanced CT [25]; wall discontinuity or irregular thickening of the innermost layer, irregular thickening of the outermost layer, loss of a multilayer pattern on the US [26]; and increased signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging-MRI are characteristic of gallbladder cancer [27], these findings may not be present in mucosal cancer confined to the RAS, as in our case. In fact, Nakayama et al. [18] reported in 21 literature reports that, among 22 cases of resected RAS-derived gallbladder cancer, only 5 cases of gallbladder cancer could be diagnosed preoperatively. Furthermore, only 2 out of 10 cases of advanced gallbladder cancer were able to be diagnosed [18]. As stated by Cavallaro et al. [28], laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence survival if implemented properly. Reoperation should be considered for two aims: R0 resection and clearance of the lymph nodes.
Although there are a few reports of gallbladder cancer arising from RAS [15,16,17,18,19], it is difficult to determine whether or not cancer arises from a RAS. However, our case indicated that adenocarcinoma could develop in the RAS, suggesting the existence of multistep carcinogenesis in the gallbladder through changes in ALDH1A1 expression, which is a cancer stem cell marker [22,23]. Although the question of whether ADM itself is a true precancerous lesion remains controversial, we consider that it may be a putative precursor lesion. In order to confirm this, regular follow-up studies are necessary, with the possibility of malignant transformation being kept in mind. Finally, our case may provide new insights into gallbladder carcinogenesis and associated therapeutic options [7,21].

4. Conclusions

We analyzed a case of gallbladder cancer within the RAS that included positive lesions for ALDH1A1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.I., K.I. and T.T.; data curation, A.S., Y.N., Y.O. and T.I.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.I.; writing—review and editing, T.T., Y.I. and K.I.; visualization, M.O. and T.T.; supervision, M.S. and E.T.; project administration, K.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gifu Municipal Hospital (#788) before writing this manuscript.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jutras, J.A. Hyperplastic cholecystoses; Hickey lecture, 1960. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 1960, 83, 795–827. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Kin, T.; Maguchi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Katanuma, A.; Osanai, M.; Yane, K.; Takaki, R.; Matsumoto, K.; Matsumori, T.; Gon, K.; et al. Clinicopathological features of gallbladder cancer with adenomyomatosis. J. Jpn. Biliary Assoc. 2014, 28, 633–640. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Basturk, O.; Aishima, S.; Esposito, I. Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia. In WHO Classification of Tumors: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2019; pp. 273–275. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fukumura, Y.; Rong, L.; Maimaitiaili, Y.; Fujisawa, T.; Isayama, H.; Nakahodo, J.; Kikuyama, M.; Yao, T. Precursor Lesions of Gallbladder Carcinoma: Disease Concept, Pathology, and Genetics. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sato, Y.; Harada, K.; Sasaki, M.; Nakanuma, Y. Histological Characterization of Biliary Intraepithelial Neoplasia with respect to Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Int. J. Hepatol. 2014, 2014, 678260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lendvai, G.; Szekerczes, T.; Illyes, I.; Dora, R.; Kontsek, E.; Gogl, A.; Kiss, A.; Werling, K.; Kovalszky, I.; Schaff, Z.; et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: Classification, Histopathology and Molecular Carcinogenesis. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2020, 26, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koppaka, V.; Thompson, D.C.; Chen, Y.; Ellermann, M.; Nicolaou, K.C.; Juvonen, R.O.; Petersen, D.; Deitrich, R.A.; Hurley, T.D.; Vasiliou, V. Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors: A comprehensive review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, substrate specificity, and clinical application. Pharm. Rev. 2012, 64, 520–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Xu, X.; Chai, S.; Wang, P.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, K. Aldehyde dehydrogenases and cancer stem cells. Cancer Lett. 2015, 369, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yue, H.; Hu, Z.; Hu, R.; Guo, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y. ALDH1A1 in Cancers: Bidirectional Function, Drug Resistance, and Regulatory Mechanism. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 918778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Safa, A.R. Resistance to Cell Death and Its Modulation in Cancer Stem Cells. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2016, 21, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kida, M.; Hasegawa, R.; Matsumoto, T.; Mishima, T.; Kaneko, T.; Tokunaga, S.; Yamauchi, H.; Okuwaki, K.; Miyazawa, S.; Iwai, T.; et al. Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder -pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2015, 112, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ootani, T.; Shirai, Y.; Tsukada, K.; Muto, T. Relationship between gallbladder carcinoma and the segmental type of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Cancer 1992, 69, 2647–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nabatame, N.; Shirai, Y.; Nishimura, A.; Yokoyama, N.; Wakai, T.; Hatakeyama, K. High risk of gallbladder carcinoma in elderly patients with segmental adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 23, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Mori, K.; Kubokawa, Y.; Sai, J.; Suyama, M.; Nobukawa, B. Clinical and immunohistochemical study of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder combined with gallbladder cancer. J. Jpn. Biliary Assoc. 2010, 24, 675–682. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Anno, K.; Jinkan, S.; Kubokawa, Y.; Kato, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Inami, K.; Chikamori, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Maruki, J.; Suyama, M. Carcinoma of segmental type adenomyomatosis, originating in the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus―A case report. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat. Imaging 2008, 10, 343–349. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Hattori, M.; Kunou, T.; Yokoi, S.; Saeki, S.; Okada, Y.; Shibahara, H.; Abe, T.; Satou, K.; Kawahara, T.; Hayakawa, S. A Case of Advanced Gallbladder Cancer derived from the Rokitansky-Aschoff Sinus. Jpn. J. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2006, 39, 1822–1826. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matsumoto, T.; Shimada, K. A case of gallbladder cancer arising from the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 39, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Nakayama, T.; Morita, T.; Tanaka, E.; Narasaki, H.; Kuwatani, T.; Takahashi, T. A case of gallbladder cancer derived from a Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus that was diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Jpn. Surg. Assoc. 2015, 70, 359–364. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Washida, M.; Nishihira, T.; Kaneko, T.; Ishii, T.; Iwai, A.; Ide, Y. A case of adenomyomatosis with unexpectd gallbladder cancer. J. Jpn. Surg. Assoc. 2002, 63, 2775–2779. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tomita, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Hara, A. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 in stem cells and cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 11018–11032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, B.; Yang, K.; Liang, D.; Jiang, C.; Ma, Z. Discovery and development of selective aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 209, 112940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, D.C.; Yang, Z.L.; Jiang, S. Identification of musashi-1 and ALDH1 as carcinogenesis, progression, and poor-prognosis related biomarkers for gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 2010, 8, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yadav, A.; Gupta, A.; Rastogi, N.; Agrawal, S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, V.; Mittal, B. Association of cancer stem cell markers genetic variants with gallbladder cancer susceptibility, prognosis, and survival. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 1835–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, M.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, H.S.; Jung, S.I. Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 2967–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, S.J.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Han, J.K.; Choi, B.I.; Choi, J.Y. Analysis of enhancement pattern of flat gallbladder wall thickening on MDCT to differentiate gallbladder cancer from cholecystitis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008, 191, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Joo, I.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, M.A.; Han, J.K.; Choi, B.I. Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound. Eur. Radiol. 2013, 23, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ogawa, T.; Horaguchi, J.; Fujita, N.; Noda, Y.; Kobayashi, G.; Ito, K.; Koshita, S.; Kanno, Y.; Masu, K.; Sugita, R. High b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for gallbladder lesions: Differentiation between benignity and malignancy. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 47, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cavallaro, A.; Piccolo, G.; Di Vita, M.; Zanghi, A.; Cardi, F.; Di Mattia, P.; Barbera, G.; Borzi, L.; Panebianco, V.; Di Carlo, I.; et al. Managing the incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: Algorithms and controversies. Int. J. Surg. 2014, 12 (Suppl. 2), S108–S119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Multiple cystic structures suggest RAS at the fundus of the gallbladder (arrow head). A 7.4-mm stalked polyp on the gallbladder body (arrow).
Figure 1. Multiple cystic structures suggest RAS at the fundus of the gallbladder (arrow head). A 7.4-mm stalked polyp on the gallbladder body (arrow).
Diagnostics 12 02721 g001
Figure 2. The axial images of contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT). Multiple cystic structures were described at the fundus of the gallbladder (arrowhead). The contrasting attitude of the fundus of the gallbladder wall was normal, as was the gallbladder neck and body, and there was no irregularity of the gallbladder wall.
Figure 2. The axial images of contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT). Multiple cystic structures were described at the fundus of the gallbladder (arrowhead). The contrasting attitude of the fundus of the gallbladder wall was normal, as was the gallbladder neck and body, and there was no irregularity of the gallbladder wall.
Diagnostics 12 02721 g002
Figure 3. (a) T2-weighted image, (b) 42 s phases of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), (c) 72 s phases of CE-MRI, and (d) 125 s phases of CE-MRI. There was no abnormal signal in the wall at the fundus of the gallbladder (arrowhead).
Figure 3. (a) T2-weighted image, (b) 42 s phases of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), (c) 72 s phases of CE-MRI, and (d) 125 s phases of CE-MRI. There was no abnormal signal in the wall at the fundus of the gallbladder (arrowhead).
Diagnostics 12 02721 g003
Figure 4. (a) Macroscopic view of the cut surfaces of the gallbladder from a specimen removed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Note the thickened wall with multilobular cysts. (b) Histopathology of the thickened wall indicates adenomyomatosis, with expanded Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses. H & E stain, Bar = 1 mm. Black circle and box: small foci of BilIN-3, H & E stain, Bar = 100 m. (c) A cystic lesion lined by hyperplastic columnar cells. H & E stain, Bar = 50 m. (d) A BilIN-1 lesion. H & E stain, Bar = 100 m. (e) A large BilIN-3 lesion. H & E stain, Bar = 1 mm. (f) High-power view of the large BilIN-3. Note: BilIN-3 consists of atypical cells with enlarged nucleoli. H & E stain, Bar = 50 m. (g) Another large BilIN-3 lesion. H & E stain, Bar=1 mm. (h) High-power view of the large BilIN-3. Note: BilIN-3 consists of atypical cells with enlarged nucleoli, complex nuclear stratification, and loss of nuclear polarity. H & E stain, Bar = 20 m.
Figure 4. (a) Macroscopic view of the cut surfaces of the gallbladder from a specimen removed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Note the thickened wall with multilobular cysts. (b) Histopathology of the thickened wall indicates adenomyomatosis, with expanded Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses. H & E stain, Bar = 1 mm. Black circle and box: small foci of BilIN-3, H & E stain, Bar = 100 m. (c) A cystic lesion lined by hyperplastic columnar cells. H & E stain, Bar = 50 m. (d) A BilIN-1 lesion. H & E stain, Bar = 100 m. (e) A large BilIN-3 lesion. H & E stain, Bar = 1 mm. (f) High-power view of the large BilIN-3. Note: BilIN-3 consists of atypical cells with enlarged nucleoli. H & E stain, Bar = 50 m. (g) Another large BilIN-3 lesion. H & E stain, Bar=1 mm. (h) High-power view of the large BilIN-3. Note: BilIN-3 consists of atypical cells with enlarged nucleoli, complex nuclear stratification, and loss of nuclear polarity. H & E stain, Bar = 20 m.
Diagnostics 12 02721 g004aDiagnostics 12 02721 g004b
Figure 5. (a) Atypical cells in BilIN3 show positive cytoplasm staining of ALDH1A1. (b) A few cells lined in a RAS are positive for ALDH1A1. (c) Normal appearing gallbladder epithelial cells are negative for ALDH1A1. (ac) ALDH1A1-immunohistochemistry using polyclonal rabbit anti-ALDH1A1 antibody (1:100 dilution, ab227948; Abcam, Cambridge, CB2 0AX, UK), Bars = 20 m. (d) Nuclear-positive reaction against p53 antibody. Note: Irregular positivity is found in nuclei of atypical cells composing the BilIN-3 lesion. p53 immunohistochemistry with mouse monoclonal anti-human p53 antibody (1:100 dilution, M7001; Dako, Inc., Kyoto, Japan), Bar = 20 m. (e) Approximately 65% positive rate of MIB-1 in BilIN-3 lesion. MIB-1 immunohistochemistry with mouse monoclonal anti-human Ki-67 antibody (1:100 dilution, M7240; Dako, Inc., Glostrup, Denmark), Bar = 20 m.
Figure 5. (a) Atypical cells in BilIN3 show positive cytoplasm staining of ALDH1A1. (b) A few cells lined in a RAS are positive for ALDH1A1. (c) Normal appearing gallbladder epithelial cells are negative for ALDH1A1. (ac) ALDH1A1-immunohistochemistry using polyclonal rabbit anti-ALDH1A1 antibody (1:100 dilution, ab227948; Abcam, Cambridge, CB2 0AX, UK), Bars = 20 m. (d) Nuclear-positive reaction against p53 antibody. Note: Irregular positivity is found in nuclei of atypical cells composing the BilIN-3 lesion. p53 immunohistochemistry with mouse monoclonal anti-human p53 antibody (1:100 dilution, M7001; Dako, Inc., Kyoto, Japan), Bar = 20 m. (e) Approximately 65% positive rate of MIB-1 in BilIN-3 lesion. MIB-1 immunohistochemistry with mouse monoclonal anti-human Ki-67 antibody (1:100 dilution, M7240; Dako, Inc., Glostrup, Denmark), Bar = 20 m.
Diagnostics 12 02721 g005
Figure 6. Negative reaction against (a) S-100P, (b) SALL4, (c) Oct 3/4, and (d) glypican 3 in atypical cells of BilIN3 using polyclonal rabbit anti-S-100P antibody (1:3000 dilution, HPA019502; Atlas Antibodies, Bromma, Sweden), polyclonal rabbit anti-SALL4 antibody (1:100 dilution, HPA015291, Atlas Antibodies, polyclonal goat anti-Oct 3/4 antibody (1:500 dilution, sc-5279, Santa Cruz Biotechnology In., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and polyclonal anti-glypican 3 antibody (1:500 dilution, 25175-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Inc., Rosemont, IL, USA), respectively, Bars = 20 μm.
Figure 6. Negative reaction against (a) S-100P, (b) SALL4, (c) Oct 3/4, and (d) glypican 3 in atypical cells of BilIN3 using polyclonal rabbit anti-S-100P antibody (1:3000 dilution, HPA019502; Atlas Antibodies, Bromma, Sweden), polyclonal rabbit anti-SALL4 antibody (1:100 dilution, HPA015291, Atlas Antibodies, polyclonal goat anti-Oct 3/4 antibody (1:500 dilution, sc-5279, Santa Cruz Biotechnology In., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and polyclonal anti-glypican 3 antibody (1:500 dilution, 25175-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Inc., Rosemont, IL, USA), respectively, Bars = 20 μm.
Diagnostics 12 02721 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iwasa, Y.; Iwata, K.; Okuno, M.; Sugiyama, A.; Nishigaki, Y.; Ohashi, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Iwashita, T.; Shimizu, M.; Tomita, E. A Case of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer, Positive for ALDH1A1, Which Arose from Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112721

AMA Style

Iwasa Y, Iwata K, Okuno M, Sugiyama A, Nishigaki Y, Ohashi Y, Tanaka T, Iwashita T, Shimizu M, Tomita E. A Case of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer, Positive for ALDH1A1, Which Arose from Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(11):2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iwasa, Yuhei, Keisuke Iwata, Mitsuru Okuno, Akihiko Sugiyama, Yoichi Nishigaki, Yosuke Ohashi, Takuji Tanaka, Takuji Iwashita, Masahito Shimizu, and Eiichi Tomita. 2022. "A Case of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer, Positive for ALDH1A1, Which Arose from Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder" Diagnostics 12, no. 11: 2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112721

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop