Next Article in Journal
TOX Expression in Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome
Next Article in Special Issue
VEXAS Syndrome: A Novelty in MDS Landscape
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Axonal Injury in Individual Patients with a Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mini-Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Automated Detection of Dysplasia: Data Mining from Our Hematology Analyzers
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis and Screening

Diagnostics 2022, 12(7), 1581; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071581
by Francisco P. Tria IV 1, Daphne C. Ang 1 and Guang Fan 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2022, 12(7), 1581; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071581
Submission received: 3 May 2022 / Revised: 26 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis and Screening)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comprehensive review on the state of art in MDS diagnosis.

I have no major concerns for the pubblication of the review. Some spelling errors should be fixed. e.g. line 320 (Isochromosome 17q instead of Isochromosome 7q) or line 242 (its instead of it's).

Author Response

June 7, 2022

 

Dear Martyna,

We are resending the revised version of our manuscript entitled “Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis and Screening”. We adequately addressed all the reviewers’ comments and suggestions. We hope you find our edited version more appealing to the readers. 
• Spelling errors are fixed.
• Additional discussions are included regarding the utility of various gene mutations and their predictive values in MDS. Also added are current literature on machine learning strategies, recent personalized prognostic prediction of MDS and proposal regarding IPSS-M. More discussions on CHIP and CCUS are also included.


Thank you and we are looking forward to your positive response. 

 

Guang Fan, MD, PhD

Medical Directory, Department of Hematopathology

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, USA

 

Francisco Tria IV, MD

Hematopathologist

St. Luke’s Medical Center

Taguig, Metro Manila, Philippines

 

Daphne Ang, MD

Hematopathologist

St. Luke’s Medical Center

Taguig, Metro Manila, Philippines

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a comprehensive review on the diagnosis and screening for MDS. 

Specific issues that has to be addressed:

1. There is paucity of discussion on the utility of various gene mutations and their predictive value for the diagnosis of MDS.

2. Please also include current literature on the use of machine-learning strategies in the diagnosis and screening of MDS.

3. Please include and discuss  the personalized prognostic prediction of MDS (JCO 2021) and the recent abstract on IPSS-M (ASH 2021)

4. Please expand on the discussion on CHIP and CCUS. 

Author Response

June 7, 2022

 

Dear Martyna,

We are resending the revised version of our manuscript entitled “Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis and Screening”. We adequately addressed all the reviewers’ comments and suggestions. We hope you find our edited version more appealing to the readers. 
• Spelling errors are fixed.
• Additional discussions are included regarding the utility of various gene mutations and their predictive values in MDS. Also added are current literature on machine learning strategies, recent personalized prognostic prediction of MDS and proposal regarding IPSS-M. More discussions on CHIP and CCUS are also included.


Thank you and we are looking forward to your positive response. 

 

Guang Fan, MD, PhD

Medical Directory, Department of Hematopathology

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, USA

 

Francisco Tria IV, MD

Hematopathologist

St. Luke’s Medical Center

Taguig, Metro Manila, Philippines

 

Daphne Ang, MD

Hematopathologist

St. Luke’s Medical Center

Taguig, Metro Manila, Philippines

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

All issues have been addressed.

Author Response

We appreciate your comments and efforts to review our manuscript. Attached is our final version for publication.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop