Next Article in Journal
Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Reply to Çiftci, S.; Aydin, B.K. Comment on “Lee et al. Accuracy of New Deep Learning Model-Based Segmentation and Key-Point Multi-Detection Method for Ultrasonographic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Screening. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1174”
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Christensen et al. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279

by
Tine N. Christensen
1,2,*,
Seppo W. Langer
3,4,
Gitte Persson
4,5,
Klaus Richter Larsen
6,
Annemarie G. Amtoft
1,
Sune H. Keller
1,
Andreas Kjaer
1,2 and
Barbara Malene Fischer
1,4,7
1
Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
2
Cluster for Molecular Imaging, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
3
Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
4
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
5
Department of Oncology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
6
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
7
The PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(7), 1741; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071741
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 28 June 2022 / Published: 18 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 6a. Figure 6a was replaced by Figure 6b, and thus Figure 6a,b appeared identical. The corrected Figure 6 appears below.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Christensen, T.N.; Langer, S.W.; Persson, G.; Larsen, K.R.; Amtoft, A.G.; Keller, S.H.; Kjaer, A.; Fischer, B.M. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the relapse diagnosis with FDG-SUVmax (a) and FLT-SUVmax (b).
Figure 6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the relapse diagnosis with FDG-SUVmax (a) and FLT-SUVmax (b).
Diagnostics 12 01741 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Christensen, T.N.; Langer, S.W.; Persson, G.; Larsen, K.R.; Amtoft, A.G.; Keller, S.H.; Kjaer, A.; Fischer, B.M. Correction: Christensen et al. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071741

AMA Style

Christensen TN, Langer SW, Persson G, Larsen KR, Amtoft AG, Keller SH, Kjaer A, Fischer BM. Correction: Christensen et al. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(7):1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071741

Chicago/Turabian Style

Christensen, Tine N., Seppo W. Langer, Gitte Persson, Klaus Richter Larsen, Annemarie G. Amtoft, Sune H. Keller, Andreas Kjaer, and Barbara Malene Fischer. 2022. "Correction: Christensen et al. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279" Diagnostics 12, no. 7: 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071741

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop