Next Article in Journal
The Potential Role of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 in COVID-19: A Corollary Subjective Effect or Not?
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparing Lean and Obese PCOS in Different PCOS Phenotypes: Evidence That the Body Weight Is More Important than the Rotterdam Phenotype in Influencing the Metabolic Status
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Public Health Preparedness for Highly Infectious Diseases in Central Vietnam
Previous Article in Special Issue
Criteria for Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome during Adolescence: Literature Review
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Differentiating Polycystic Ovary Syndrome from Adrenal Disorders

Diagnostics 2022, 12(9), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092045
by Mert Yesiladali 1, Melis G. K. Yazici 1, Erkut Attar 1 and Fahrettin Kelestimur 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2022, 12(9), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092045
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well written and falls within the scope of the journal. I have appreciated the presence of figures.

I have only minor concerns:

In your opinion, how the different PCOS phenotypes could help or delay the right diagnosis?

In order to improve your reference, I advise to take into account these two papers for you introduction/discussion section: doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1391205; doi: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1781815.

Author Response

1-In your opinion, how the different PCOS phenotypes could help or delay the right diagnosis?

The reviewer brings up an important point. In our opinion, the phenotype including PCOM and menstrual abnormalities/anovulation delays, the phenotype including hirsutism, high androgen levels and oligo/amenorrhea helps the diagnosis of PCOS. I think that this issue may not needs to be mentioned in the manuscript.

2-In order to improve your reference, I advise to take into account these two papers for you introduction/discussion section: doi…

These two references were added

Reviewer 2 Report

 

Dear Authors,

The presented study tackles an important issue of Differentiating Polycystic Ovary Syndrome from Adrenal Disorders. I have read the manuscript with great interest. The study was conducted reliably with the appropriate selection of articles.

However, some issues require complementary information:

1.       I suggest redrafting  the Abstract. The Abstract should be a reume of the manuscript not the Introduction. I suugest including major information about differentiating of PCOS and Adrenal Disorders.

2.       I suggest including a figure to show differential diagnosis more clear.

3.       I suggest including some more information about the procedurÄ™ of ACTH-stimulation test.

4.       I suggest including the information about 2 mg dexametasone test.

5.       I suggest including Discussion section.

Author Response

1-I suggest redrafting the abstract. The abstract should be resume of the manuscript not for the introduction. I suggest including major information about differentiating of PCOS and adrenal disorders.

We appreciate the reviewer for this comment. Abstract was rewritten.

 

2-I suggest including a figure to show differential diagnosis more clear.

Thanks for this suggestion. We have included a figure to show differential diagnosis more clear.

 

3-I suggest including some more information abot the procedure of ACTH stimulation test.

The procedure of ACTH stimulation test was stated in the relevant section.

 

4-I suggest including the information about 2 mg dexamethasone test

The procedure of 2 mg dexamethasone suppression test was also described in the relevant section.

 

5-I suggest including discussion section.

A discussion section was added.

Back to TopTop