Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Enhancement Kinetics Improves the Specificity of Abbreviated Breast MRI: Performance in an Enriched Cohort
Next Article in Special Issue
Inter-Rater Reliability between Structured and Non-Structured Interviews Is Fair in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorders—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Alleviating Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Improving Physical Function: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Depression and Related Factors among Patients with Chronic Disease during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Measuring Impairments of Mentalization with the 15-Item Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ) and Introducing the MZQ-6 Short Scale: Reliability, Validity and Norm Values Based on a Representative Sample of the German Population

Diagnostics 2023, 13(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010135
by David Riedl 1,2,*,†, Hanna Kampling 3,†, Tobias Nolte 4,5, Astrid Lampe 1,6, Manfred E. Beutel 7, Elmar Brähler 7,8 and Johannes Kruse 3,9
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Diagnostics 2023, 13(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010135
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for sending me this manuscript to review. I think it is an interesting work and very useful for the readers of this journal.

Author Response

Thank you for your kind words.

Reviewer 2 Report

I have uploaded an annotated pdf version of the originally submitted pdf file. Seventeen comments appear in the right-hand panel of the pdf file. Edits are highlighted by using the 'comments' box as well as struck-through statements. One or two citations are necessary in some sections. The authors acknowledge that the sample used in the present study is not a clinical one and this may partly account for the lower substantive convergent evidence.  

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your helpful comments. A detailed point-to-point response is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

See the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your helpful comments. A detailed point-to-point response is attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop