Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Potential Diagnostic Utility of the Determination of Selected Immunological and Molecular Parameters in Patients with Ovarian Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Lung Ultrasound: A Leading Diagnostic Tool
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the IKBKG Gene on the Appearance of the Corpus Callosum Abnormalities in Incontinentia Pigmenti
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Living with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Radiological Images of a Patient with Extensive Heterotopic Ossification

by
Mohammed Mostafa Kotb
1,
Usama Farghaly Omar
2 and
Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal
3,*
1
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit, Assiut University School of Medicine, Assiut 71526, Egypt
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Service, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore 768828, Singapore
3
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 636921, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(10), 1711; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101711
Submission received: 5 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 9 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosing Rare Diseases: Advances and Challenges)

Abstract

:
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an exceptionally rare genetic disorder characterized by the progressive formation of heterotopic bone in soft tissues. Here, we present the radiological findings of an 18-year-old female diagnosed with FOP who had severe spinal and right-upper-limb abnormalities. Her SF-36 scores suggested significant impairment in physical function, affecting work and other regular daily activities. Radiographic evaluation with X-rays and CT scans revealed scoliosis and total fusion of almost all levels of the spine, with only a few disc spaces spared. A large mass of heterotopic bone was observed, corresponding to the location of the paraspinal muscles in the lumbar region, branching upwards and fusing with the scapulae on both sides. On the right side, this exuberant heterotopic bone mass fused with the humerus, resulting in a fixed right shoulder, while the rest of the upper and lower limbs are spared and have a range of motion. Our report highlights the extensive ossification that can manifest in patients with FOP, resulting in restricted mobility and a poor quality of life. While there is no definite treatment that can reverse the effects of the disease, preventing injuries and minimizing iatrogenic harm is of critical importance in this patient as inflammation is known to play a key role in triggering heterotopic bone. Meanwhile, ongoing research into therapeutic strategies holds the key to unlocking a potential cure for FOP in the future.

Figure 1. Three-dimensional CT images of the upper body, pelvis, and hip joints of an 18-year-old female with a clinicoradiological diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), an exceptionally rare genetic disease affecting 1 in 2 million people that is caused by a gain-of-function mutation in the gene that encodes activin A receptor type I (ACVR1) [1,2]. The disease is characterized by progressive heterotopic ossifications in various extraskeletal sites [3]. In the patient reported here, the disease initially presented as neck stiffness, followed by multiple episodes of back stiffness, the appearance of notable hard lumps, and finally, restricted movement in the right shoulder joint, with pain preceding stiffness in all affected locations. (ad) Thoracolumbar scoliosis and complete ossification of the disc spaces in the thoracic spine can be noted in both the anterior and oblique views, while fusion of the posterior elements, especially at the lumbar region, is evident on the oblique views. (b,d) The cervical spine appears to be fused, as indicated by fused lateral masses and posterior elements. (d,e) Heterotopic bone is observed, descending from the occiput, potentially indicating an ossified capitus muscle on the left side. (e) On the posterior aspect, a large mass of heterotopic bone is observed, corresponding to the location of the paraspinal muscles, branching upwards and fusing with the scapulae on both sides. On the right side, the heterotopic bone mass is fused with the humerus. (a,e) In addition, small, heterotopic bony projections are seen, originating from the first rib and pointing upwards. The rest of the upper limb was unaffected, allowing for full active range of motion in both elbows, wrists, and hands. Physical function, as measured by the SF-36 score, showed significant impairment (20/100), which affected her work and daily activities. As a result, her emotional and social well-being were also impacted. There were no obvious soft-tissue flare-ups at the time of presentation; however, she had hip pain that was described as moderate and interfering with daily activities.
Figure 1. Three-dimensional CT images of the upper body, pelvis, and hip joints of an 18-year-old female with a clinicoradiological diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), an exceptionally rare genetic disease affecting 1 in 2 million people that is caused by a gain-of-function mutation in the gene that encodes activin A receptor type I (ACVR1) [1,2]. The disease is characterized by progressive heterotopic ossifications in various extraskeletal sites [3]. In the patient reported here, the disease initially presented as neck stiffness, followed by multiple episodes of back stiffness, the appearance of notable hard lumps, and finally, restricted movement in the right shoulder joint, with pain preceding stiffness in all affected locations. (ad) Thoracolumbar scoliosis and complete ossification of the disc spaces in the thoracic spine can be noted in both the anterior and oblique views, while fusion of the posterior elements, especially at the lumbar region, is evident on the oblique views. (b,d) The cervical spine appears to be fused, as indicated by fused lateral masses and posterior elements. (d,e) Heterotopic bone is observed, descending from the occiput, potentially indicating an ossified capitus muscle on the left side. (e) On the posterior aspect, a large mass of heterotopic bone is observed, corresponding to the location of the paraspinal muscles, branching upwards and fusing with the scapulae on both sides. On the right side, the heterotopic bone mass is fused with the humerus. (a,e) In addition, small, heterotopic bony projections are seen, originating from the first rib and pointing upwards. The rest of the upper limb was unaffected, allowing for full active range of motion in both elbows, wrists, and hands. Physical function, as measured by the SF-36 score, showed significant impairment (20/100), which affected her work and daily activities. As a result, her emotional and social well-being were also impacted. There were no obvious soft-tissue flare-ups at the time of presentation; however, she had hip pain that was described as moderate and interfering with daily activities.
Diagnostics 13 01711 g001
Figure 2. Whole-spine CT scans, both coronal and sagittal sections. (ad) Sections clearly show the thoracolumbar scoliosis, along with fused cervical disc spaces and posterior elements, with only the discs above and below C7 appearing to be spared. (c) Sagittal section shows the fusion of thoracic disc spaces and the thoracolumbar posterior elements. (c,d) The heterotopic bone involving the posterior muscles are also seen clearly in the sagittal views.
Figure 2. Whole-spine CT scans, both coronal and sagittal sections. (ad) Sections clearly show the thoracolumbar scoliosis, along with fused cervical disc spaces and posterior elements, with only the discs above and below C7 appearing to be spared. (c) Sagittal section shows the fusion of thoracic disc spaces and the thoracolumbar posterior elements. (c,d) The heterotopic bone involving the posterior muscles are also seen clearly in the sagittal views.
Diagnostics 13 01711 g002
Figure 3. Close-up 3D CT images of the rib cage, scapulae, and shoulder joints. (a) While the front of the chest wall appears to be relatively spared, there is an isolated mass of heterotopic bone on the left anterior chest wall adjacent to the sternum. (b) Oblique view of the chest wall, showing fusion of the right humerus to the heterotopic bone mass in the posterior aspect. (c,d) Oblique view, showing that the left shoulder joint and humerus are free of restricting ossifications. (d,e) Posterior views, showing that both scapulae are fused with the heterotopic bone extending from the lumbar paraspinal region. (e) Fusion of the right humerus to the heterotopic bone mass can be noted. (f) Posterior view of the chest wall, clearly showing fusion of the posterior elements of the spine.
Figure 3. Close-up 3D CT images of the rib cage, scapulae, and shoulder joints. (a) While the front of the chest wall appears to be relatively spared, there is an isolated mass of heterotopic bone on the left anterior chest wall adjacent to the sternum. (b) Oblique view of the chest wall, showing fusion of the right humerus to the heterotopic bone mass in the posterior aspect. (c,d) Oblique view, showing that the left shoulder joint and humerus are free of restricting ossifications. (d,e) Posterior views, showing that both scapulae are fused with the heterotopic bone extending from the lumbar paraspinal region. (e) Fusion of the right humerus to the heterotopic bone mass can be noted. (f) Posterior view of the chest wall, clearly showing fusion of the posterior elements of the spine.
Diagnostics 13 01711 g003
Figure 4. Three-dimensional CT images of the pelvis. (a,b) Images demonstrate a tilted pelvis, in compensation for the thoracolumbar scoliosis. (bd) Posterior and oblique views, showing a heterotopic bony mass arising from the left ischium and projecting upwards. As such, the hip joints are unaffected by movement-restricting heterotopic ossifications; however, asymmetry of femoral heads can be noted, with the right femoral head appearing larger than the left. While hip rotations were restricted to a certain extent, no other heterotopic ossifications were observed in the lower limbs. Despite the significant impairment of mobility caused by widespread ossifications in the spine and the right upper limb, the patient can walk and manage her daily tasks with assistance. Although genetic sequencing was not performed to ascertain the mutation, classical signs were confirmatory of the diagnosis and currently, treatment is focused on mitigating inflammation with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and reducing pain [4]. While there is no definite treatment that can reverse the effects of the disease [5], Kaplan et al. have provided a comprehensive overview of the present medical management strategies, which serves as a guide for healthcare professionals treating individuals with FOP [6]. However, it should be noted that there could be progressive development of heterotopic bone at multiple sites, eventually leading to a significant loss of mobility [7,8]. Hence, it is important for patients to work closely with healthcare providers to manage symptoms and maintain the highest possible level of function and quality of life. While ongoing research on novel drugs targeting the FOP process continues, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of the initial diagnostic features of the condition, such as malformed great toes, even prior to the onset of heterotopic ossification [9]. Doing so gives a chance for early genetic consultation and testing. If signs favor a diagnosis of FOP, preventing injuries and minimizing iatrogenic harm is of critical importance, as injury sites are known to be susceptible to the cascade of events that lead to heterotopic ossification [10].
Figure 4. Three-dimensional CT images of the pelvis. (a,b) Images demonstrate a tilted pelvis, in compensation for the thoracolumbar scoliosis. (bd) Posterior and oblique views, showing a heterotopic bony mass arising from the left ischium and projecting upwards. As such, the hip joints are unaffected by movement-restricting heterotopic ossifications; however, asymmetry of femoral heads can be noted, with the right femoral head appearing larger than the left. While hip rotations were restricted to a certain extent, no other heterotopic ossifications were observed in the lower limbs. Despite the significant impairment of mobility caused by widespread ossifications in the spine and the right upper limb, the patient can walk and manage her daily tasks with assistance. Although genetic sequencing was not performed to ascertain the mutation, classical signs were confirmatory of the diagnosis and currently, treatment is focused on mitigating inflammation with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and reducing pain [4]. While there is no definite treatment that can reverse the effects of the disease [5], Kaplan et al. have provided a comprehensive overview of the present medical management strategies, which serves as a guide for healthcare professionals treating individuals with FOP [6]. However, it should be noted that there could be progressive development of heterotopic bone at multiple sites, eventually leading to a significant loss of mobility [7,8]. Hence, it is important for patients to work closely with healthcare providers to manage symptoms and maintain the highest possible level of function and quality of life. While ongoing research on novel drugs targeting the FOP process continues, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of the initial diagnostic features of the condition, such as malformed great toes, even prior to the onset of heterotopic ossification [9]. Doing so gives a chance for early genetic consultation and testing. If signs favor a diagnosis of FOP, preventing injuries and minimizing iatrogenic harm is of critical importance, as injury sites are known to be susceptible to the cascade of events that lead to heterotopic ossification [10].
Diagnostics 13 01711 g004

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.K., U.F.O. and A.-K.K.-P.; methodology, M.M.K., U.F.O. and A.-K.K.-P.; investigation, M.M.K.; resources, M.M.K. and U.F.O.; data curation, U.F.O. and A.-K.K.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-K.K.-P.; writing—review and editing, U.F.O. and A.-K.K.-P.; supervision, M.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qi, Z.; Luan, J.; Zhou, X.; Cui, Y.; Han, J. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Basic understanding and experimental models. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2017, 6, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ravazzolo, R.; Bocciardi, R. Genomic Context and Mechanisms of the ACVR1 Mutation in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Meyers, C.; Lisiecki, J.; Miller, S.; Levin, A.; Fayad, L.; Ding, C.; Sono, T.; McCarthy, E.; Levi, B.; James, A.W. Heterotopic Ossification: A Comprehensive Review. JBMR Plus 2019, 3, e10172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Smilde, B.J.; Botman, E.; de Ruiter, R.D.; Smit, J.M.; Teunissen, B.P.; Lubbers, W.D.; Schwarte, L.A.; Schober, P.; Eekhoff, E.M.W. Monitoring and Management of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Current Perspectives. Orthop. Res. Rev. 2022, 14, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kitoh, H. Clinical Aspects and Current Therapeutic Approaches for FOP. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kaplan, F.S.; Mukaddam, M.A.; Baujat, G.; Brown, M.; Cali, A.; Cho, T.J.; Crowe, C.; De Cunto, C.L.; Delai, P.; Diecidue, R.J.; et al. The medical management of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Current treatment considerations. Proc. Intl. Clin. Council FOP 2021, 2, 1–127. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pignolo, R.J.; Shore, E.M.; Kaplan, F.S. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Diagnosis, management, and therapeutic horizons. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Rev. 2013, 10 (Suppl. S2), 437–448. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Ortiz-Agapito, F.; Colmenares-Bonilla, D. Quality of life of patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J. Child. Orthop. 2015, 9, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Towler, O.W.; Kaplan, F.S.; Shore, E.M. The Developmental Phenotype of the Great Toe in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 612853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kaplan, F.S.; Lounev, V.Y.; Wang, H.; Pignolo, R.J.; Shore, E.M. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: A blueprint for metamorphosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1237, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kotb, M.M.; Omar, U.F.; Kaliya-Perumal, A.-K. Living with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Radiological Images of a Patient with Extensive Heterotopic Ossification. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101711

AMA Style

Kotb MM, Omar UF, Kaliya-Perumal A-K. Living with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Radiological Images of a Patient with Extensive Heterotopic Ossification. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(10):1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101711

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kotb, Mohammed Mostafa, Usama Farghaly Omar, and Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal. 2023. "Living with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Radiological Images of a Patient with Extensive Heterotopic Ossification" Diagnostics 13, no. 10: 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101711

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop