Next Article in Journal
Interpretable Machine Learning for Personalized Medical Recommendations: A LIME-Based Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Metastasis from Prostate Cancer: A Case Study Underlying the Crucial Role of the PSMA PET/CT
Previous Article in Journal
Hydroxyapatite Deposition Disease: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Radiological Findings, and Treatment Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting

1
Department of Urology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
2
Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(16), 2677; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162677
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 3 August 2023 / Accepted: 4 August 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: State of the Art)

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as a new cornerstone in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. However, mpMRI is not devoid of factors influencing its detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Amongst others, prostate volume has been demonstrated to influence the detection rates of csPCa. Particularly, increasing volume has been linked to a reduced cancer detection rate. However, information about the linkage between PI-RADS, prostate volume and detection rate is relatively sparse. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the association between prostate volume, PI-RADS score and detection rate of csP-Ca, representing daily practice and contemporary mpMRI expertise. Thus, 1039 consecutive patients with 1151 PI-RADS targets, who underwent mpMRI-guided prostate biopsy at our tertiary referral center, were included. Prior mpMRI had been assessed by a plethora of 111 radiology offices, including academic centers and private practices. mpMRI was not secondarily reviewed in house before biopsy. mpMRI-targeted biopsy was performed by a small group of a total of ten urologists, who had performed at least 100 previous biopsies. Using ROC analysis, we defined cut-off values of prostate volume for each PI-RADS score, where the detection rate drops significantly. For PI-RADS 4 lesions, we found a volume > 61.5 ccm significantly reduced the cancer detection rate (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.38; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS 5 lesions, we found a volume > 51.5 ccm to significantly reduce the cancer detection rate (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25–0.62; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS 3 lesions, none of the evaluated clinical parameters had a significant impact on the detection rate of csPCa. In conclusion, we show that enlarged prostate volume represents a major limitation in the daily practice of mpMRI-targeted biopsy. This study is the first to define exact cut-off values of prostate volume to significantly impair the validity of PI-RADS assessed in a real-world setting. Therefore, the results of mpMRI-targeted biopsy should be interpreted carefully, especially in patients with prostate volumes above our defined thresholds.
Keywords: prostate volume; PI-RADS; biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; prostate cancer; MRI prostate volume; PI-RADS; biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; prostate cancer; MRI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Volz, Y.; Apfelbeck, M.; Pyrgidis, N.; Pfitzinger, P.L.; Berg, E.; Ebner, B.; Enzinger, B.; Ivanova, T.; Atzler, M.; Kazmierczak, P.M.; et al. The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2677. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162677

AMA Style

Volz Y, Apfelbeck M, Pyrgidis N, Pfitzinger PL, Berg E, Ebner B, Enzinger B, Ivanova T, Atzler M, Kazmierczak PM, et al. The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(16):2677. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162677

Chicago/Turabian Style

Volz, Yannic, Maria Apfelbeck, Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Paulo L. Pfitzinger, Elena Berg, Benedikt Ebner, Benazir Enzinger, Troya Ivanova, Michael Atzler, Philipp M. Kazmierczak, and et al. 2023. "The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting" Diagnostics 13, no. 16: 2677. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162677

APA Style

Volz, Y., Apfelbeck, M., Pyrgidis, N., Pfitzinger, P. L., Berg, E., Ebner, B., Enzinger, B., Ivanova, T., Atzler, M., Kazmierczak, P. M., Clevert, D.-A., Stief, C., & Chaloupka, M. (2023). The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting. Diagnostics, 13(16), 2677. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162677

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop