Next Article in Journal
Odontogenic Factors Associated with Maxillary Sinus Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and their Relationship to Chronic Sinonasal Symptoms: An Ambispective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Crimean–Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus: Progress in Vaccine Development
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 16
10.3390/diagnostics13162709
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Screening and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates

by
Giuseppe Vadalà
1,2,*,†,
Chiara Alaimo
2,†,
Giancarlo Buccheri
2,†,
Luca Di Fazio
2,†,
Leandro Di Caccamo
2,†,
Vincenzo Sucato
1,2,†,
Manlio Cipriani
3,† and
Alfredo Ruggero Galassi
2,†
1
Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, 90100 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy
3
Institute of Transplant and Highly Specialized Therapies (ISMETT) of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(16), 2709; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162709
Submission received: 13 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 14 August 2023 / Published: 20 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and during the first year after transplantation. For these reasons, and due to the shortage of organs available for transplant, it is of utmost importance to identify patients with a good life expectancy after transplant and minimize the transplant peri-operative risk. Various conditions, such as severe pulmonary diseases, recent myocardial infarction or stroke, and severe aorto-iliac atherosclerosis, need to be ruled out before adding a patient to the transplant waiting list. The effectiveness of systematic coronary artery disease (CAD) treatment before kidney transplant is still debated, and there is no universal screening protocol, not to mention that a nontailored screening could lead to unnecessary invasive procedures and delay or exclude some patients from transplantation. Despite the different clinical guidelines on CAD screening in kidney transplant candidates that exist, up to today, there is no worldwide universal protocol. This review summarizes the key points of cardiovascular risk assessment in renal transplant candidates and faces the role of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging tools and the impact of coronary revascularization versus best medical therapy before kidney transplant on a patient’s cardiovascular outcome.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [1]. Furthermore, the risk of cardiovascular adverse events continues to be relevant during the first year after the transplantation, necessitating a regular cardiological follow-up [2,3]. On the other hand, the prevalence of CKD in the general population is increasing [4], especially in some subgroups of patients like diabetics, in which kidney microvascular disease often leads to the need for dialysis or renal transplantation [5]. Furthermore, the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has reached pandemic proportions, representing it as a relevant health problem [6]. For these reasons, and due to the shortage of organs available for transplant, it is of utmost importance to identify patients with a good life expectancy after transplant and minimize the transplant peri-operative risk. Severe pulmonary diseases, previous myocardial infarction, or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the last 6 months or severe aorto-iliac atherosclerosis are some of the conditions to rule out before listing a patient for kidney transplant [7].
Finally, whether a systematic coronary artery disease (CAD) treatment before kidney transplant may improve short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes is still under debate, not to mention that a nontailored screening could lead to unnecessary invasive procedures and delay or exclude some patients from transplantation unjustifiably [8].
This review summarizes the key points of cardiovascular risk assessment and CAD management of renal transplant candidates, as suggested by the most representative scientific societies [9,10,11,12,13], facing the role of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging tools and the impact of coronary revascularization versus best medical therapy before kidney transplant on a patient’s cardiovascular outcome.

2. CAD Presentation and Its Pathophysiology

ESRD patients have cardiovascular mortality twenty times higher than the general population [14]. At least 35% of these patients complain of effort angina or had a previous myocardial infarction (MI) at the time of first medical contact with the nephrologist. However, stable CAD seems to be more common than acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [15].
Among ACS, non-ST-elevation MI is more frequent than ST-elevation MI [16]. Heart failure (HF), arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are other possible clinical manifestations [17].
Sometimes these patients may complain of “atypical” symptoms or angina equivalents like dyspnea or fatigue [18]. Besides the classic cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), like hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, tobacco use, and family history, it is supposed that in patients with ESRD additional CKD-related factors might play a role in CAD pathophysiology. Furthermore, whilst the correction of CVRF in the general population results in a well-established cardiovascular event reduction [19], among patients with ESRD, this benefit is so far lower [20]. Nontraditional risk factors can be distinguished into CKD/ESRD-related and hemodialysis-related risk factors. They are summarized in Table 1.

2.1. Classic CV Risk Factors

Traditional CVRF are highly prevalent in CKD patients. They contribute not only to the progression of the atherosclerotic process but also to kidney damage, generating a vicious cycle known as cardiorenal syndrome type 4 [21]. Among all CVRF, hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) play a pivotal role in CKD development and progression. The relationship between HTN and CKD is complex: HTN is, in fact, both the cause and effect of CKD. Moreover, the prevalence of HTN is roughly 84% among CKD patients, and it becomes more common if diabetic nephropathy coexists [22]. Finally, with the decline of eGFR, HTN incidence, prevalence, and severity significantly increase [23].
DM is the most common cause of CKD worldwide. Approximately 20% of all adults with DM have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [24]. DM is now globally the leading cause of ESRD, accounting for roughly 33% of all patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) [25].
Both HTN and DM are responsible for macro and microvascular damage, such as, kidney artery stenosis, nephrosclerosis and glomerular dysfunction, and accelerated coronary and peripheral artery disease. In particular, the term “nephrosclerosis” refers to the process of interstitial inflammatory fibrosis that affects the glomerular capillaries and largely contributes to renal function decline [26,27].
Among traditional CVRF, tobacco use should be mentioned as well. A relationship between tobacco use and its adverse effects on kidney function has been highlighted in several observational studies [28,29,30]. A cross-sectional study by Hallan et al. showed an increased risk of CKD incidence and progression in smokers with a high cumulative lifetime cigarette exposure (RR 1.42 for 25–49 pack years, RR 2.05 for > 50 pack years). However, only a few studies were specifically focused on the CKD population [31]. Among these, a prospective study conducted by Wesson et al. deserves mention. The authors enrolled 216 CKD-stage 2 (eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 and spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio > 200 mg/g), hypertensive, nondiabetic patients to test if smoking cessation could increase the beneficial effects of ACE inhibition (in particular enalapril) and mitigate kidney damage progression [32]. At 5 years, the smokers had lower eGFR compared with quitters and nonsmokers. Moreover, smoking cessation attenuated eGFR decline compared with smokers (−1.7 ± 1.5 vs. −3.4 ± 1.8 mL/ min/1.73 m2/year), while eGFR did not significantly change in nonsmokers (–1.3 ± 1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year). Different pathogenic mechanisms have been supposed to explain the relationship between cigarette smoking and CKD. Endothelial damage and oxidative stress play a primary role. Furthermore, tobacco use can induce a hyperoxidative stress state in synergy with DM and HTN [33], increasing tissue angiotensin II (AII) level, which exacerbates kidney oxidative stress further [34].
For all these reasons, adequate blood pressure and glycemic control and smoking cessation are strictly recommended, both leading to a reduction in the combined outcome of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) [35,36].

2.2. Anemia

Anemia is a common complication of CKD; it is associated with a reduced quality of life, worse renal survival, and a higher rate of adverse cardiovascular events [37]. Its prevalence and severity are higher as the glomerular filtration declines (ranging between 8.4% at stage I and 53.4% at ESRD). In most cases, CKD-related anemia is due to several complex pathogenic mechanisms, like (1) erythropoietin (EPO) deficiency; (2) iron deficiency due to blood loss or increased hepcidin levels; (3) reduced red cell life span; (4) inflammation and comorbidities; (5) reduced marrow response to EPO; (6) B12 and/or folic acid deficiencies. Among these factors, EPO deficiency is the most important. It is possible to find low EPO levels at the early stages of CKD, but the deficiency becomes clinically relevant when eGFR is <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Chronic low oxygen arterial content due to anemia induces a cardiovascular compensatory response with increased cardiac output and consequent left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) [38].

2.3. Volume Overload, Fluid Retention, and LVH

Sodium loading related to reduced glomerular filtration velocity causes significant fluid retention and consequent volume overload. The main effect of volume overload is the left ventricular mass increase [39].
LVH is present in about one-third of all patients with CKD, and it is an independent predictor of survival in patients with CKD [40]. Furthermore, LVH is one of the most important causes of myocardial ischemia due to the oxygen supply−demand mismatch [41]. LVH in CKD is caused by cardiac preload increase and cardiac afterload boost secondary to a systemic arterial resistance increase. This condition causes cardiac maladaptive changes and cardiomyocyte death, which in turn result in left ventricular concentric remodeling; over time, left ventricle dilatation and systolic dysfunction occur. Moreover, many nonhemodynamic factors also contribute to the development of LVH and cardiomyopathy in CKD patients. Among these, inappropriate activation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAAS), oxidative stress, inflammation, and stimulation of profibrogenic factors (cardiotrophin-1, galectin-3, transforming growth factor-b, fibroblast growth factor-23) deserve mention [42].

2.4. Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

CKD is associated with the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism. This condition compromises calcium, phosphate, and vitamin D homeostasis, finally leading to vascular and valvular calcifications. These findings are the result of vascular smooth muscle cell transformation into osteoblast-like cells by the uptake of phosphorus. Phosphate levels and vascular calcification have been associated with increased CAD and cardiovascular events [43].

2.5. Endothelial Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammation

CKD causes a chronic pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative state with immune cell dysregulation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and reduced nitric oxide (NO) availability that, in turn, lead to endothelial dysfunction, vascular remodeling, accelerated atherosclerosis, and myocardial damage [44,45,46].
Patients with CKD may have a dysfunction of different immune cells, which is responsible for negative effects on the kidney and cardiovascular system [47]. For example, it has been shown that monocytes have increased expression of macrophage scavenger receptors (CD36) and consequent enhanced vascular uptake of oxidized, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), contributing to the atherosclerotic process [48]. Moreover, monocyte cells showed an aberrant expression of integrin and toll-like receptors (TLRs) with high expressions of genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines (like IL-6, IL-1β and TNFα) [49,50]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are responsible for dendritic cell activation, which in turn promotes T-cell proliferation. T-CD8+ cells can infiltrate the myocardium and produce potent cytokines, including IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNFα [51]. A variety of immune cells can also induce TGFβ production, which is responsible for fibroblast activation and consequent peri-arteriolar and myocardial fibrosis [52].
The endothelial dysfunction not only facilitates coronary atherosclerotic plaque formation, progression, and destabilization but also involves the coronary microcirculatory system [53]. Different studies have demonstrated the relationship between the degree of glomerular filtration impairment and the reduction of coronary flow reserve (CFR) [54]. High ROS levels are associated with both eGFR decline and CFR impairment. Among ROS, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) has been shown to compromise coronary endothelial function. In fact, ADMA is an endogenous competitive inhibitor of NO synthase (NOS). In turn, decreased endothelial NO production impairs microcirculation both in the kidneys and heart [55]. Moreover, high ADMA levels have also been associated with higher intima−media thickness and cardiovascular (CV) events in ESRD [56].

2.6. Platelet Abnormalities

Acquired platelet abnormalities, such as a reduced serotonin content and an altered thrombin-induced release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), have been identified in CKD patients. These conditions may promote both a prothrombotic and hemorrhagic state [57].

2.7. Uremic Toxins

With the decline of renal function, a large group of uremic solutes, normally cleared by the kidneys, accumulate with a detrimental effect on the cardiovascular system [58]. Over 100 uremic toxins have been identified and classified by The European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox). Among these, an important group is represented by the protein-bound uremic toxins, accounting for approximately 25% of all currently identified uremic toxins, like indoxyl sulfate, hippuric acid, and p-cresyl sulfate. Uremic toxins lead to endothelial dysfunction and ROS production, with negative effects on myocardial and endothelial cells [59,60]. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut-derived, free water-soluble, low-molecular-weight uremic toxin, deserves mention. TMAO has been recently associated with the atherosclerotic process by NLRP3 inflammasome activation and inflammatory interleukins production, like IL-1β and IL-18. NLRP3 increases endothelial permeability, enhancing macrophage and monocyte infiltration into vascular atherosclerotic lesions [61]. Although hemodialysis prolongs the survival of ESRD patients, it does not completely relieve the uremic state, leaving patients with the so-called “residual syndrome” [62].

2.8. Hemodialysis-Related Factors

Although hemodialysis (HD) should improve cardiovascular function by fluid overload correction and uremic toxin removal, cardiovascular mortality in ESRD patients continues to be high [63]. Different HD-related risk factors must be mentioned. Artero-venous (A-V) fistula used for HD creates a reduced vascular resistance state leading to a compensatory hyperactivation of RAAS and the sympathetic system, finally resulting in cardiac output increase. Furthermore, HD itself determines hemodynamic stress; dialysis pulls fluid from the intravascular compartment, which in turn draws fluid from the interstitial. Any mismatch in plasma removal and refill rates can lead to rapid volume contraction and consequent hypotension, which is predictive of increased mortality [64]. Moreover, the interdialytic period is associated with fluid retention and overload increase that adds further stress on the cardiovascular system [65]. Despite the fact that HD removes different toxins that may impair platelet function and hemostasis, current hydrophobic dialyzer membranes promote protein deposition (IgG, C3, fibrinogen, etc.) and consequent abnormal activation of complement, coagulation, and inflammation [66]. Finally, HD contributes to endothelial dysfunction by a NO bioactivity reduction and ROS generation [67].
Despite the lack of clear evidence, a systematic pre-operative clinical evaluation of transplant candidates should identify and correct classical and nontraditional CV risk factors.

3. Cardiac Screening before Kidney Transplantation

This section provides an overview of the available recommendations on CV risk stratification of renal transplant candidates from scientific societies, namely the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation (ERBP), the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACC), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (Table 2).
Different approaches to prerenal transplant screening of cardiovascular disease have been proposed to reduce the number of unfavorable cardiovascular events occurring at the time of and after kidney transplant. All these protocols are based on the patient’s cardiovascular risk stratification. Cardiac screening has the task of excluding from the waiting list those candidates with high cardiovascular perioperative risk and those with well-known CAD and long-term prognosis concerns [68].
Table 2. Cardiovascular screening before renal transplant of high cardiovascular risk and asymptomatic patients according to ERBP, the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; and ESC, European Society of Cardiology.
Table 2. Cardiovascular screening before renal transplant of high cardiovascular risk and asymptomatic patients according to ERBP, the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; and ESC, European Society of Cardiology.
SocietyHigh-Risk CriteriaManagement
AHA/ACC (2012) [12]
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Prior CVD
  • More than one year on dialysis
  • LVH
  • Age > 60 years
  • Smoking
  • Hypertension
  • Dyslipidemia
  • All patient: ECG + echocardiogram
  • High-risk patients: noninvasive stress testing
  • Coronary angiography if positive noninvasive stress test or symptom of CAD.
ERBP (2013) [13]
  • Older age
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Prior CVD
  • All patients: ECG + chest x-ray
  • High-risk patients: exercise tolerance test and echocardiogram
  • Noninvasive stress imaging if positive or inconclusive exercise tolerance test
  • Coronary angiography if positive test for cardiac ischemia or symptom of CAD
AHA (2022) [69]
  • Age > 60 years
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Smoking
  • Prior cerebrovascular disease
  • PAD
  • Duration dialysis + prior kidney transplantation > 5 years
No prior CAD:
  • All patients: ECG + echocardiogram
  • High-risk patients: functional or anatomic assessment
  • Coronary angiography if ECG, echocardiogram, functional of anatomic assessment positive or symptom of CAD
Prior CAD:
  • Coronary angiography >2 years: functional assessment
  • Coronary angiography <2 years: no revascularized CAD?
  • New coronary angiography if functional assessment is positive or previous CAD not revascularized
ESC (2022) [70]
  • Age > 65 years
  • Smoking
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Family history of CVD
  • All patients: history + physical examination + standard laboratory test
  • High-risk patients/Prior CAD: ECG + biomarkers + functional capacity
  • If ECG or symptoms suggestive of CAD → echocardiogram → stress imaging → coronary angiography
ERPB = European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; ECG = electrocardiogram; LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy; CAD = coronary artery disease; CVD = cardiovascular disease; PAD = Peripheral artery disease.
While symptomatic patients for angina or angina equivalents should be referred to a cardiologist to evaluate the need for myocardial revascularization following reference guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes in ESRD, the role of screening in asymptomatic/low-risk CAD patients is less obvious [9,69]. Given that transplant candidates often had significant CAD without symptoms, the enhancement of pre-transplant screening should, in theory, improve outcomes, but this is not always the case.
Indeed, in a national observational propensity cohort study, among 2572 kidney transplant candidates asymptomatic for CAD, 50% underwent CAD screening by stress test, coronary CT, and/or coronary angiogram, while the remaining 50% did not. The study showed that the risk of MACE at 90 days (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.31–2.05; p = 0.64), at one year (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51–2.47; p = 0.77), at five years (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.86–1.99; p = 0.20) and after transplantation, was similar in both groups [71].

3.1. Asymptomatic Patient—Low Cardiovascular Risk

The 2013 European Renal Best Practice Transplantation (ERBP) Guidelines suggested that, besides clinical data collection, the physical examination, resting electrocardiogram (ECG), and chest X-ray are sufficient to rule out CAD in asymptomatic low cardiovascular risk kidney transplant candidates (younger age, no diabetes, no history of cardiovascular disease) [13].
Similarly, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACC) recommend an approach comprehensive of the patient’s clinical history, a thorough physical examination, a resting 12-lead ECG, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment through echocardiography (Figure 1) [12,69].
According to the recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on “Cardiovascular Assessment and Management of Patients undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery (NCS)” (Figure 1), the renal transplant is listed among surgery at intermediate risk of 30-day MACE (1–5%). As such, all patients scheduled for kidney transplantation should undergo an accurate medical history and physical examination. Patients <65 years, who have no signs, symptoms, or a history of CVD or CV risk factors, are deemed low risk and can undergo moderate-risk surgery without an extra pre-operative risk evaluation. However, a 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before NCS in individuals with a family history of hereditary cardiomyopathy, regardless of age or symptoms, is recommended [70].
In conclusion, American and European scientific societies agree on a conservative screening approach for asymptomatic kidney transplant candidates with low cardiovascular risk. Stress tests and/or coronary angiography are not necessary if initial screening tests yield negative results [12,13,69,70].

3.2. Asymptomatic Patient—High Cardiovascular Risk

Table 2 shows the high cardiovascular risk features proposed by American and European scientific societies.
The ERBP Guideline recommends an echocardiography and an exercise tolerance test for all patients, while a stress imaging test (stress echocardiography (SE) or myocardial perfusion studies (MPS) is suggested only in cases of positive or inconclusive preliminary exams. Finally, coronary angiography is indicated if noninvasive stress imaging is positive [13]. SE sensitivity and specificity in CKD patients are 0.73 and 0.88, respectively, whereas MPS sensitivity and specificity are 0.66 and 0.75, respectively [69]. Because of increased arterial calcification in CKD, the efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to define the degree of obstructive lesions is limited (sensitivity 0.96 and specificity 0.66). A normal CCTA may offer reassurance, but an abnormal result could be of nonunivocal interpretation because of a 29% false-positive [12].
According to the 2022 Scientific Statement from the AHA (Figure 2), when a patient with no history of CAD has a high cardiovascular risk, functional testing (SE or MPS) or anatomic testing (CCTA or invasive coronary angiography [CA]) is recommended. Differently, if a patient has a known CAD, it is advisable to evaluate their most recent coronary angiography. At the same time, if the previous CA was conducted more than 2 years before, a stress test is recommended before further investigations [69].
The ESC Guideline (Figure 2) considers people < 65 years, as well as those who have at least one risk factor for CVD, to be at a greater risk of having undetected CVD. These individuals require additional evaluation prior to intermediate-risk surgery, such as kidney transplant, as well as appropriate management of risk factors. ECG, functional capacity assessment (self-reported ability to climb two flights of stairs), and/or biomarker measurement (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T or I [hs-cTn T or hs-cTn I] and/or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]/B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP]) are all indicated. It is recommended to measure hs-cTn T or hs-cTn I before surgery, as well as 24 and 48 h thereafter. In patients with known CAD, the same process should be followed [70]. Trans thoracic echocardiography (TTE) may be considered before kidney transplant in patients with low functional capacity, abnormal ECG, high NT-proBNP/BNP, or ≥1 clinical risk factor. When ischemia is a concern in individuals with clinical risk factors and low functional capacity, stress imaging may be considered before intermediate-risk NCS. CCTA should be considered to rule out CAD in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) or biomarker-negative non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) in case of low-to-intermediate clinical likelihood of CAD, or in patients unsuitable for noninvasive functional testing undergoing nonurgent, intermediate-risk NCS [70].

4. Revascularization vs. Best Medical Therapy (BMT) before Transplantation: A Question Still Unanswered

CAD management in kidney transplant candidates is cumbersome. The main indication for revascularization is driven by the persistence of symptoms despite optimized medical therapy (OMT) and/or to improve prognosis.

4.1. Optimized Medical Therapy

The management of CAD in CKD patients should be the same as in the general population [42,72]. Nonpharmacological treatment, such as lifestyle optimization, smoking cessation, and weight loss should always be recommended, according to current guidelines for CV prevention [19].
The use of antiplatelets, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), and beta-blockers are currently recommended. The use of these drugs in waiting list patients, during the peri-operative period and late after kidney transplant guidelines is also recommended [73]. However, underutilization of these drugs in CKD patients is caused by some concerns about the bleeding risk or the worsening of renal function. About this topic, Qiao et al. highlighted that interruption of ACE-I or ARB therapy in patients with decreasing renal function is associated with a higher risk of mortality and MACE [74]. While β-blocker treatment reduced the risk of all-cause (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64–0.80) and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49–0.89) in all CKD stages [75], ACE-I and ARB have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in several large randomized trials [76], but few data are available on patients with advanced CKD [77].

4.1.1. Lipid-Lowering Drugs

The Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) examined the effect of simvastatin versus simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease without a previous coronary artery disease. The study demonstrated that lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe produces a 17% reduction in the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization [78].
Similarly, Sooho et al., in late-stage chronic kidney disease in a postend-stage renal disease transition population, showed that statin therapy reduces the all-cause of death and cardiovascular mortality at twelve months, as well as the hospitalization rate after initiating dialysis compared to the group of patients not treated by statins. Over 12 months of follow-up, patients who received statin therapy in the year before the transition to end-stage renal disease had a lower all-cause mortality rate (33.1 [95% CI, 32.3–33.8] vs. 37.9 [95% CI, 37.0–38.8] per 100 person-years, respectively), a 12% lower all-cause mortality risk in the unadjusted model (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85–0.91]), and (in adjusted models) a 17% lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78–0.88]) if compared with those who did not receive statin therapy [79].

4.1.2. Upcoming Role of Gliflozines

In recent years, sodium−glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to decrease both kidney and cardiovascular adverse outcomes in patients with kidney disease and heart failure [80,81,82,83]. Furthermore, the CREDENCE trial and the DAPA-CKD trial evaluated the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with CKD, with and without Type 2 diabetes [84,85].
In the CREDENCE trial, the event rate of the composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death was significantly lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (43.2 and 61.2 events per 1000 patient-years, respectively), which resulted in a 30% relative risk reduction [HR = 0.70; 95%CI = 0.59–0.82; p = 0.00001] [84]. Similarly, the DAPA-CKD showed a significant risk reduction of the composite of sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal causes [OR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.45–0.68; p < 0.001)], and of the composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure [HR = 0.71; 95%CI = 0.55–0.92; p = 0.009)]. Of note, the DAPA-CKD trial showed an all-cause mortality risk reduction [HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.53–0.88; p = 0.004] [85,86].
However, data about the safety and efficacy data on SGLT2i therapy in kidney transplant recipients are very limited because these studies focused predominantly on short-term outcomes, like glycemic control, body weight reduction, eGFR, and blood pressure (BP) changes. Long-term outcomes on chronic allograft function, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as graft and patient survival, remain to be explored in the future [87].

4.2. Revascularization

Although a large number of previous randomized trials and meta-analyses, showed that myocardial revascularization of symptomatic patients with high-risk CAD had a better outcome compared with those treated by medical therapy only, these studies were not specifically designed for patients with end-stage renal failure on dialysis and/or waiting for renal transplantation [88,89,90,91,92].
On the other hand, the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation recommends excluding from the kidney transplant waiting list those asymptomatic patients with severe CAD unless their estimated survival meets the acceptable criteria outlined by national standards and in selected cases after successful revascularization (Figure 3) [9]. Beyond this background, the role of myocardial revascularization before kidney transplant is still a question without a definitive answer, and the available evidence leads to conflicting results.
Kumar et al. evaluated the role of coronary angiography in all potential transplant candidates over 50 years, and/or with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, symptoms or ECG signs of ischemia or previous myocardial infarction. Myocardial revascularization was performed in 28% of patients. At one and three-year follow-ups, the cardiac event-free survival was respectively 98.0% and 88.4% in those patients who underwent transplant after revascularization, and 94.0% and 90.0% in those on dialysis treatment and still on the waiting list [93].
Bangalore et al. compared a revascularization strategy by CABG or PCI in a cohort of 5920 patients with chronic renal failure. Compared with the CABG group, the PCI group had a lower short-term risk of death (1.0% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.01), stroke (0.4% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.0001), and lower risk of repeated revascularization (0.4% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.04). Conversely, at four years follow-up, in the subgroup of patients on dialysis therapy, PCI had higher death (54.3% vs. 39.1%; p = 0.0002), MI (31.9% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.05), and repeated revascularization (48.3% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.0003) rates than CABG [94].
Finally, the recent ISCHEMIA-CKD trial [8] compared the effects of a conservative versus interventional approach in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and advanced kidney disease (defined by eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or treated with dialysis therapy). Compared to optimized medical therapy, myocardial revascularization did not show any benefits.
However, the ISCHEMIA-CKD study was not specifically designed for kidney transplant candidates.
In a posthoc analysis of the ISCHEMIA-CKD study, Herzog et al. focused on the subgroup of patients included in the study who underwent cardiac stress testing prior to randomization as part of their assessment for kidney transplant listing. Among patients assigned to an invasive strategy versus conservative strategy, the adjusted hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.54) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78–1.37) for those listed and not listed, respectively (p of interaction = 0.68). The authors concluded that an invasive strategy in kidney transplant candidates did not improve outcomes compared with conservative management [95].
In a recent meta-analysis, Siddiqui et al. evaluated the potential benefit of coronary revascularization over optimal medical therapy in renal transplant candidates with asymptomatic coronary artery disease and heterogeneity of characteristics and risk factors. The primary study endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Eight studies comprising 945 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed no difference in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or MACE rate between candidates who underwent revascularization and those managed by OMT [96].
In conclusion, the available studies did not support routine coronary angiography or revascularization in all patients with advanced CKD and chronic coronary syndromes listed for transplant.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Duration after PCI

The need for DAPT after percutaneous revascularization is one of the main causes of kidney transplant delay. Furthermore, ESRD patients have a high hemorrhagic risk and a concomitant prothrombotic state, making their management very complex [92]. The guidelines on percutaneous coronary revascularization do not provide specific indications on antiplatelet therapy duration in kidney transplant candidates, and very few data on this subset of patients are available [73,92].
Dogan et al. investigated the safety of an early DAPT discontinuation (Aspirin plus Clopidogrel) in renal transplant waiting list patients who underwent a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implant or a bare-metal stent (BMS). According to DAPT duration, the DES group was divided into DES early interruption (three months after DES implantation) and DES late interruption (3–12 months after DES implantation); in the bare-metal stent group, DAPT duration was at least one month. No difference in myocardial infarction, death, and MACEs was found between DES-early and DES-late groups [97]. For this reason, a three-month DAPT therapy after a second-generation DES implant, is safe and does not increase myocardial infarction and MACE rates in kidney transplant candidates. Similarly, the latest generation DES showed a good safety profile with a one-month duration of DAPT [98,99,100]. In conclusion, early DAPT interruption after new generation DES seems to be safe even in transplant candidates.

5. Future Perspectives

One of the main questions still unanswered is if a systematic CAD screening among asymptomatic kidney wait-list patients can definitively improve patients’ outcomes. An ongoing randomized controlled trial named the CARSK study (Canadian Australasian Randomized Trial of Screening Kidney Transplant Candidates for CAD) will test the hypothesis that eliminating screening tests for unknown CAD is not inferior to regular screening for the prevention of MACEs of waiting list patients. By validating or refuting the use of screening tests during wait listing, CARSK will ensure judicious use of health resources and optimal patient outcomes [101].
There is a growing use of noninvasive imaging assessment of the coronary anatomy, such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET), but more research is needed to precisely evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these tests in patients in kidney transplant wait lists [102].

6. Conclusions

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and death in CKD patients. An accurate cardiovascular risk assessment of transplant candidates is mandatory to properly allocate the few available organs to those patients who have a low peri-operative transplant risk and a reasonable long-term life expectancy. However, in those more controversial cases, a multidisciplinary approach might be necessary to decide if a candidate must be maintained or excluded from the waiting list.

Author Contributions

All the authors provided a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work, to the drafting of the work, or to revising it critically for important intellectual content. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: all the authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fox, C.S.; Matsushita, K.; Woodward, M.; Bilo, H.J.G.; Chalmers, J.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Lee, B.J.; Perkins, R.M.; Rossing, P.; Sairenchi, T.; et al. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: A meta-analysis. Lancet 2012, 380, 1662–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sarnak, M.J.; Amann, K.; Bangalore, S.; Cavalcante, J.L.; Charytan, D.M.; Craig, J.C.; Gill, J.S.; Hlatky, M.A.; Jardine, A.G.; Landmesser, U.; et al. Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 1823–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Batabyal, P.; Chapman, J.R.; Wong, G.; Craig, J.C.; Tong, A. Clinical practice guidelines on wait-listing for kidney transplantation: Consistent and equitable? Transplantation 2012, 94, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brück, K.; Stel, V.S.; Gambaro, G.; Hallan, S.; Völzke, H.; Ärnlöv, J.; Kastarinen, M.; Guessous, I.; Vinhas, J.; Stengel, B.; et al. CKD Prevalence Varies across the European General Population. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 2135–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tuttle, K.R.; Bakris, G.L.; Bilous, R.W.; Chiang, J.L.; de Boer, I.H.; Goldstein-Fuchs, J.; Hirsch, I.B.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Narva, A.S.; Navaneethan, S.D.; et al. Diabetic kidney disease: A report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Diabetes Care 2014, 37, 2864–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ogurtsova, K.; da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Huang, Y.; Linnenkamp, U.; Guariguata, L.; Cho, N.H.; Cavan, D.; Shaw, J.E.; Makaroff, L.E. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 128, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rankin, A.J.; Mark, P.B. Cardiac screening prior to renal transplantation-good intentions, rather than good evidence, dictate practice. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 306–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bangalore, S.; Maron, D.J.; O’Brien, S.M.; Fleg, J.L.; Kretov, E.I.; Briguori, C.; Kaul, U.; Reynolds, H.R.; Mazurek, T.; Sidhu, M.S.; et al. Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1608–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chadban, S.J.; Ahn, C.; Axelrod, D.A.; Foster, B.J.; Kasiske, B.L.; Kher, V.; Kumar, D.; Oberbauer, R.; Pascual, J.; Pilmore, H.L.; et al. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2020, 104, S11–S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kasiske, B.L.; Cangro, C.B.; Hariharan, S.; Hricik, D.E.; Kerman, R.H.; Roth, D.; Rush, D.N.; Vazquez, M.A.; Weir, M.R.; American Society of Transplantation. The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: Clinical practice guidelines. Am. J. Transplant. 2001, 1 (Suppl. S2), 3–95. [Google Scholar]
  11. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery); American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society for Vascular Surgery; Fleisher, L.A.; et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Anesth. Analg. 2008, 106, 685–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lentine, K.L.; Costa, S.P.; Weir, M.R.; Robb, J.F.; Fleisher, L.A.; Kasiske, B.L.; Carithers, R.L.; Ragosta, M.; Bolton, K.; Auerbach, A.D.; et al. Cardiac Disease Evaluation and Management Among Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation 2012, 126, 617–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. European Renal Best Practice Transplantation Guideline Development Group. ERBP Guideline on the Management and Evaluation of the Kidney Donor and Recipient. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2013, 28 (Suppl. S2), ii1–ii71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nakano, T.; Ninomiya, T.; Sumiyoshi, S.; Fujii, H.; Doi, Y.; Hirakata, H.; Tsuruya, K.; Iida, M.; Kiyohara, Y.; Sueishi, K. Association of kidney function with coronary atherosclerosis and calcification in autopsy samples from Japanese elders: The Hisayama study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2010, 55, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cozzolino, M.; Mangano, M.; Stucchi, A.; Ciceri, P.; Conte, F.; Galassi, A. Cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018, 33, iii28–iii34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, L.W.; Fahim, M.A.; Hayen, A.; Mitchell, R.L.; Baines, L.; Lord, S.; Craig, J.C.; Webster, A.C. Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 2011, CD008691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cozzolino, M.; Galassi, A.; Pivari, F.; Ciceri, P.; Conte, F. The Cardiovascular Burden in End-Stage Renal Disease. Contrib. Nephrol. 2017, 191, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sosnov, J.; Lessard, D.; Goldberg, R.J.; Yarzebski, J.; Gore, J.M. Differential symptoms of acute myocardial infarction in patients with kidney disease: A community-wide perspective. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2006, 47, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Visseren, F.L.J.; Mach, F.; Smulders, Y.M.; Carballo, D.; Koskinas, K.C.; Bäck, M.; Benetos, A.; Biffi, A.; Boavida, J.-M.; Capodanno, D.; et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 3227–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Go, A.S.; Chertow, G.M.; Fan, D.; McCulloch, C.E.; Hsu, C. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1296–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ronco, C.; Bellasi, A.; Di Lullo, L. Cardiorenal Syndrome: An Overview. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2018, 25, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Horowitz, B.; Miskulin, D.; Zager, P. Epidemiology of hypertension in CKD. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015, 22, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pugh, D.; Gallacher, P.J.; Dhaun, N. Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease. Drugs 2019, 79, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Garla, V.; Yanes-Cardozo, L.; Lien, L.F. Current therapeutic approaches in the management of hyperglycemia in chronic renal disease. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017, 18, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Atkins, R.C.; Zimmet, P. Diabetic kidney disease: Act now or pay later. Kidney Int. 2010, 77, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meyrier, A. Nephrosclerosis: A term in quest of a disease. Nephron 2015, 129, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wilson, P.W.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Levy, D.; Belanger, A.M.; Silbershatz, H.; Kannel, W.B. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998, 97, 1837–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bleyer, A.J.; Shemanski, L.R.; Burke, G.L.; Hansen, K.J.; Appel, R.G. Tobacco, hypertension, and vascular disease: Risk factors for renal functional decline in an older population. Kidney Int. 2000, 57, 2072–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nagasawa, Y.; Yamamoto, R.; Rakugi, H.; Isaka, Y. Cigarette smoking and chronic kidney diseases. Hypertens. Res. 2012, 35, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamagata, K.; Ishida, K.; Sairenchi, T.; Takahashi, H.; Ohba, S.; Shiigai, T.; Narita, M.; Koyama, A. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a community-based population: A 10-year follow-up study. Kidney Int. 2007, 71, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Leonberg-Yoo, A.K.; Rudnick, M.R. Tobacco Use: A Chronic Kidney Disease Accelerant. Am. J. Nephrol. 2017, 46, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roehm, B.; Simoni, J.; Pruszynski, J.; Wesson, D.E. Cigarette Smoking Attenuates Kidney Protection by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition in Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease. Am. J. Nephrol. 2017, 46, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zalba, G.; Fortuño, A.; Díez, J. Oxidative stress and atherosclerosis in early chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2006, 21, 2686–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brand, S.; Amann, K.; Schupp, N. Angiotensin II-induced hypertension dose-dependently leads to oxidative stress and DNA damage in mouse kidneys and hearts. J. Hypertens. 2013, 31, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roehm, B.; Weiner, D.E. Blood pressure targets and kidney and cardiovascular disease: Same data but discordant guidelines. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2019, 28, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. ADVANCE Collaborative Group; Patel, A.; MacMahon, S.; Chalmers, J.; Neal, B.; Billot, L.; Woodward, M.; Marre, M.; Cooper, M.; Glasziou, P.; et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2560–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Eckardt, K.U. Anaemia in end-stage renal disease: Pathophysiological considerations. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2001, 16 (Suppl. S7), 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Portolés, J.; Martín, L.; Broseta, J.J.; Cases, A. Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Pathophysiology and Current Treatments, to Future Agents. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 642296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miller, W.L. Fluid Volume Overload and Congestion in Heart Failure: Time to Reconsider Pathophysiology and How Volume Is Assessed. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e002922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Alhaj, E.; Alhaj, N.; Rahman, I.; Niazi, T.O.; Berkowitz, R.; Klapholz, M. Uremic cardiomyopathy: An underdiagnosed disease. Congest. Heart Fail. 2013, 19, E40–E45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Foley, R.N.; Parfrey, P.S.; Harnett, J.D.; Kent, G.M.; Murray, D.C.; Barre, P.E. The impact of anemia on cardiomyopathy, morbidity, and and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1996, 28, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Herzog, C.A.; Asinger, R.W.; Berger, A.K.; Charytan, D.M.; Díez, J.; Hart, R.G.; Eckardt, K.-U.; Kasiske, B.L.; McCullough, P.A.; Passman, R.S.; et al. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. A clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2011, 80, 572–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dhingra, R.; Sullivan, L.M.; Fox, C.S.; Wang, T.J.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Gaziano, J.M.; Vasan, R.S. Relations of serum phosphorus and calcium levels to the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the community. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Daenen, K.; Andries, A.; Mekahli, D.; Van Schepdael, A.; Jouret, F.; Bammens, B. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2019, 34, 975–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tbahriti, H.F.; Kaddous, A.; Bouchenak, M.; Mekki, K. Effect of different stages of chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapies on oxidant-antioxidant balance in uremic patients. Biochem. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 358985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Popolo, A.; Autore, G.; Pinto, A.; Marzocco, S. Oxidative stress in patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic renal failure. Free Radic. Res. 2013, 47, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dounousi, E.; Duni, A.; Naka, K.K.; Vartholomatos, G.; Zoccali, C. The Innate Immune System and Cardiovascular Disease in ESKD: Monocytes and Natural Killer Cells. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 19, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chmielewski, M.; Bryl, E.; Marzec, L.; Aleksandrowicz, E.; Witkowski, J.M.; Rutkowski, B. Expression of scavenger receptor CD36 in chronic renal failure patients. Artif. Organs 2005, 29, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kato, S.; Chmielewski, M.; Honda, H.; Pecoits-Filho, R.; Matsuo, S.; Yuzawa, Y.; Tranaeus, A.; Stenvinkel, P.; Lindholm, B. Aspects of immune dysfunction in end-stage renal disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 3, 1526–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moghimpour Bijani, F.; Vallejo, J.G.; Rezaei, N. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways in cardiovascular diseases: Challenges and opportunities. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 31, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, V.; Rosenzweig, R.; Asalla, S.; Nehra, S.; Prabhu, S.D.; Bansal, S.S. TNFR1 Contributes to Activation-Induced Cell Death of Pathological CD4+ T Lymphocytes During Ischemic Heart Failure. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2022, 7, 1038–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rurik, J.G.; Aghajanian, H.; Epstein, J.A. Immune Cells and Immunotherapy for Cardiac Injury and Repair. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 1766–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Opherk, D.; Mall, G.; Zebe, H.; Schwarz, F.; Weihe, E.; Manthey, J.; Kübler, W. Reduction of coronary reserve: A mechanism for angina pectoris in patients with arterial hypertension and normal coronary arteries. Circulation 1984, 69, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chade, A.R.; Brosh, D.; Higano, S.T.; Lennon, R.J.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. Mild renal insufficiency is associated with reduced coronary flow in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Kidney Int. 2006, 69, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fujii, H.; Takiuchi, S.; Kawano, Y.; Fukagawa, M. Putative role of asymmetric dimethylarginine in microvascular disease of kidney and heart in hypertensive patients. Am. J. Hypertens. 2008, 21, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wilcox, C.S. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and reactive oxygen species: Unwelcome twin visitors to the cardiovascular and kidney disease tables. Hypertension 2012, 59, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kaw, D.; Malhotra, D. Platelet dysfunction and end-stage renal disease. Semin. Dial. 2006, 19, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Duranton, F.; Cohen, G.; De Smet, R.; Rodriguez, M.; Jankowski, J.; Vanholder, R.; Argiles, A.; European Uremic Toxin Work Group. Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012, 23, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tumur, Z.; Shimizu, H.; Enomoto, A.; Miyazaki, H.; Niwa, T. Indoxyl sulfate upregulates expression of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 by oxidative stress-induced NF-kappaB activation. Am. J. Nephrol. 2010, 31, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meijers, B.K.I.; Van Kerckhoven, S.; Verbeke, K.; Dehaen, W.; Vanrenterghem, Y.; Hoylaerts, M.F.; Evenepoel, P. The uremic retention solute p-cresyl sulfate and markers of endothelial damage. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2009, 54, 891–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boini, K.M.; Hussain, T.; Li, P.-L.; Koka, S. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Instigates NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Endothelial Dysfunction. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 44, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Meyer, T.W.; Hostetter, T.H. Uremia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 1316–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Saran, R.; Robinson, B.; Abbott, K.C.; Agodoa, L.Y.C.; Albertus, P.; Ayanian, J.; Balkrishnan, R.; Bragg-Gresham, J.; Cao, J.; Chen, J.L.T.; et al. US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 69, A7–A8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Agarwal, R. How can we prevent intradialytic hypotension? Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2012, 21, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Regidor, D.L.; Kovesdy, C.P.; Van Wyck, D.; Bunnapradist, S.; Horwich, T.B.; Fonarow, G.C. Fluid retention is associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Circulation 2009, 119, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ekdahl, K.N.; Soveri, I.; Hilborn, J.; Fellström, B.; Nilsson, B. Cardiovascular disease in haemodialysis: Role of the intravascular innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Meyer, C.; Heiss, C.; Drexhage, C.; Kehmeier, E.S.; Balzer, J.; Mühlfeld, A.; Merx, M.W.; Lauer, T.; Kühl, H.; Floege, J.; et al. Hemodialysis-induced release of hemoglobin limits nitric oxide bioavailability and impairs vascular function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sharif, A. The Argument for Abolishing Cardiac Screening of Asymptomatic Kidney Transplant Candidates. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020, 75, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cheng, X.S.; VanWagner, L.B.; Costa, S.P.; Axelrod, D.A.; Bangalore, S.; Norman, S.P.A.; Herzog, C.; Lentine, K.L.; the American Heart Association Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Emerging. Evidence on Coronary Heart Disease Screening in Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022, 146, e299–e324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Halvorsen, S.; Mehilli, J.; Cassese, S.; Hall, T.S.; Abdelhamid, M.; Barbato, E.; De Hert, S.; de Laval, I.; Geisler, T.; Hinterbuchner, L.; et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 3826–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nimmo, A.; Forsyth, J.L.; Oniscu, G.C.; Robb, M.; Watson, C.; Fotheringham, J.; Roderick, P.J.; Ravanan, R.; Taylor, D.M. A propensity score–matched analysis indicates screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease does not predict cardiac events in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Narala, K.R.; Hassan, S.; LaLonde, T.A.; McCullough, P.A. Management of coronary atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2013, 38, 165–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Knuuti, J.; Wijns, W.; Saraste, A.; Capodanno, D.; Barbato, E.; Funck-Brentano, C.; Prescott, E.; Storey, R.F.; Deaton, C.; Cuisset, T.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 407–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Qiao, Y.; Shin, J.-I.; Sang, Y.; Inker, L.A.; Secora, A.; Luo, S.; Coresh, J.; Alexander, G.C.; Jackson, J.W.; Chang, A.R.; et al. Discontinuation of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Chronic Kidney Disease. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2019, 94, 2220–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Badve, S.V.; Roberts, M.A.; Hawley, C.M.; Cass, A.; Garg, A.X.; Krum, H.; Tonkin, A.; Perkovic, V. Effects of beta-adrenergic antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 1152–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xie, X.; Liu, Y.; Perkovic, V.; Li, X.; Ninomiya, T.; Hou, W.; Zhao, N.; Liu, L.; Lv, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2016, 67, 728–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Edner, M.; Benson, L.; Dahlström, U.; Lund, L.H. Association between renin-angiotensin system antagonist use and mortality in heart failure with severe renal insufficiency: A prospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 2318–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Baigent, C.; Landray, M.J.; Reith, C.; Emberson, J.; Wheeler, D.C.; Tomson, C.; Wanner, C.; Krane, V.; Cass, A.; Craig, J.; et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011, 377, 2181–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Soohoo, M.; Moradi, H.; Obi, Y.; Rhee, C.M.; Gosmanova, E.O.; Molnar, M.Z.; Kashyap, M.L.; Gillen, D.L.; Kovesdy, C.P.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; et al. Statin Therapy Before Transition to End-Stage Renal Disease With Posttransition Outcomes. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e011869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. McGuire, D.K.; Shih, W.J.; Cosentino, F.; Charbonnel, B.; Cherney, D.Z.I.; Dagogo-Jack, S.; Pratley, R.; Greenberg, M.; Wang, S.; Huyck, S.; et al. Association of SGLT2 Inhibitors With Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021, 6, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mahaffey, K.W.; Neal, B.; Perkovic, V.; de Zeeuw, D.; Fulcher, G.; Erondu, N.; Shaw, W.; Fabbrini, E.; Sun, T.; Li, Q.; et al. Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: Results From the CANVAS Program (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study). Circulation 2018, 137, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wiviott, S.D.; Raz, I.; Bonaca, M.P.; Mosenzon, O.; Kato, E.T.; Cahn, A.; Silverman, M.G.; Zelniker, T.A.; Kuder, J.F.; Murphy, S.A.; et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Patel, N.; Hindi, J.; Farouk, S.S. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Kidney Transplantation: What Are We Waiting For? Kidney360 2021, 2, 1174–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Perkovic, V.; Jardine, M.J.; Neal, B.; Bompoint, S.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Charytan, D.M.; Edwards, R.; Agarwal, R.; Bakris, G.; Bull, S.; et al. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 2295–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Heerspink, H.J.L.; Stefánsson, B.V.; Correa-Rotter, R.; Chertow, G.M.; Greene, T.; Hou, F.-F.; Mann, J.F.E.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Lindberg, M.; Rossing, P.; et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1436–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mende, C.W. Chronic Kidney Disease and SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Review of the Evolving Treatment Landscape. Adv. Ther. 2022, 39, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ujjawal, A.; Schreiber, B.; Verma, A. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in kidney transplant recipients: What is the evidence? Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 13, 20420188221090000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bittl, J.A.; He, Y.; Jacobs, A.K.; Yancy, C.W.; Normand, S.-L.T.; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Bayesian methods affirm the use of percutaneous coronary intervention to improve survival in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Circulation 2013, 127, 2177–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dzavik, V.; Ghali, W.A.; Norris, C.; Mitchell, L.B.; Koshal, A.; Saunders, L.D.; Galbraith, P.D.; Hui, W.; Faris, P.; Knudtson, M.L.; et al. Long-term survival in 11,661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: A report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Am. Heart J. 2001, 142, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lee, P.H.; Ahn, J.-M.; Chang, M.; Baek, S.; Yoon, S.-H.; Kang, S.-J.; Lee, S.-W.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, C.W.; Park, S.-W.; et al. Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Secular Trends in Patient Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hannan, E.L.; Samadashvili, Z.; Cozzens, K.; Walford, G.; Jacobs, A.K.; Holmes, D.R.; Stamato, N.J.; Gold, J.P.; Sharma, S.; Venditti, F.J.; et al. Comparative outcomes for patients who do and do not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease in New York. Circulation 2012, 125, 1870–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Neumann, F.-J.; Sousa-Uva, M.; Ahlsson, A.; Alfonso, F.; Banning, A.P.; Benedetto, U.; Byrne, R.A.; Collet, J.-P.; Falk, V.; Head, S.J.; et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 87–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kumar, N.; Baker, C.S.R.; Chan, K.; Duncan, N.; Malik, I.; Frankel, A.; Ashby, D.R.; McLean, A.; Palmer, A.; Cairns, T.D.; et al. Cardiac survival after pre-emptive coronary angiography in transplant patients and those awaiting transplantation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 6, 1912–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bangalore, S.; Guo, Y.; Samadashvili, Z.; Blecker, S.; Xu, J.; Hannan, E.L. Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 66, 1209–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Herzog, C.A.; Simegn, M.A.; Xu, Y.; Costa, S.P.; Mathew, R.O.; El-Hajjar, M.C.; Gulati, S.; Maldonado, R.A.; Daugas, E.; Madero, M.; et al. Kidney Transplant List Status and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 78, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Siddiqui, M.U.; Junarta, J.; Marhefka, G.D. Coronary Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Renal Transplant Candidates With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e023548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Doğan, A.; Özdemir, E.; Kahraman, S.; Açıl, T.; Saltan, Y.; Kurtoğlu, N. Impact of early (3 months) dual antiplatelet treatment interruption prior to renal transplantation in patients with second-generation DES on perioperative stent thrombosis and MACEs. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 2017, 18, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mehran, R.; Cao, D.; Angiolillo, D.J.; Bangalore, S.; Bhatt, D.L.; Ge, J.; Hermiller, J.; Makkar, R.R.; Neumann, F.-J.; Saito, S.; et al. 3- or 1-Month DAPT in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 14, 1870–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Smits, P.C.; Frigoli, E.; Tijssen, J.; Jüni, P.; Vranckx, P.; Ozaki, Y.; Morice, M.-C.; Chevalier, B.; Onuma, Y.; Windecker, S.; et al. Abbreviated Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at High Bleeding Risk With or Without Oral Anticoagulant Therapy After Coronary Stenting: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation 2021, 144, 1196–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pivato, C.A.; Reimers, B.; Testa, L.; Pacchioni, A.; Briguori, C.; Musto, C.; Esposito, G.; Piccolo, R.; Lucisano, L.; De Luca, L.; et al. One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Bioresorbable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in High Bleeding Risk Patients. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e023454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ying, T.; Gill, J.; Webster, A.; Kim, S.J.; Morton, R.; Klarenbach, S.W.; Kelly, P.; Ramsay, T.; Knoll, G.A.; Pilmore, H.; et al. Canadian-Australasian Randomised trial of screening kidney transplant candidates for coronary artery disease-A trial protocol for the CARSK study. Am. Heart J. 2019, 214, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kotta, P.A.; Elango, M.; Papalois, V. Preoperative Cardiovascular Assessment of the Renal Transplant Recipient: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 13 02709 g001
Figure 1. Pre-operative assessment before kidney transplantation of low cardiovascular risk and asymptomatic patient according to ERBP, the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC, European Society of Cardiology. ERPB = European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; ECG = electrocardiogram; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography. Cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, family history of cardiovascular disease.
Figure 1. Pre-operative assessment before kidney transplantation of low cardiovascular risk and asymptomatic patient according to ERBP, the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC, European Society of Cardiology. ERPB = European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; ECG = electrocardiogram; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography. Cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, family history of cardiovascular disease.
Diagnostics 13 02709 g001
Diagnostics 13 02709 g002
Figure 2. Algorithm for coronary artery disease screening in kidney transplant candidates at high cardiovascular risk and asymptomatic according to the ERBP, the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC, European Society of Cardiology. ERPB = European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography; CAD = coronary artery disease; ECG = electrocardiogram; TnT-HS = High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T/I; NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; METs = metabolic equivalents; SE = stress echocardiography; MPS = myocardial perfusion studies. Cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, family history of cardiovascular disease. Biomarkers: High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T/I (TnT-HS T/I) and/or Brain Natriuretic Peptide/ N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP). (*) at least one.
Figure 2. Algorithm for coronary artery disease screening in kidney transplant candidates at high cardiovascular risk and asymptomatic according to the ERBP, the European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC, European Society of Cardiology. ERPB = European Renal Best Practice Transplantation; AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography; CAD = coronary artery disease; ECG = electrocardiogram; TnT-HS = High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T/I; NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; METs = metabolic equivalents; SE = stress echocardiography; MPS = myocardial perfusion studies. Cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, family history of cardiovascular disease. Biomarkers: High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T/I (TnT-HS T/I) and/or Brain Natriuretic Peptide/ N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP). (*) at least one.
Diagnostics 13 02709 g002
Diagnostics 13 02709 g003
Figure 3. Conditions that can exclude or postpone a candidate from the waiting list.
Figure 3. Conditions that can exclude or postpone a candidate from the waiting list.
Diagnostics 13 02709 g003
Table 1. Traditional and nontraditional risk factors involved in CV risk of ESRD patients. ROS = reactive oxygen species. A-V = artero-venous.
Table 1. Traditional and nontraditional risk factors involved in CV risk of ESRD patients. ROS = reactive oxygen species. A-V = artero-venous.
Traditional Risk FactorsCKD-Related Risk FactorsHaemodialysis-Related Risk Factors
AgeInflammation and oxidative stress (ROS)A-V fistula
SexAnemiaBiomaterials contact
Family historyUremic toxinsHemodynamic stress
HypertensionHypervolemiaHemoglobin decompartmentalization
Diabetes mellitusSecondary hyperparathyroidism
DyslipidemiaProthrombotic state and platelet dysfunction
Tobacco use
Physical inactivity
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vadalà, G.; Alaimo, C.; Buccheri, G.; Di Fazio, L.; Di Caccamo, L.; Sucato, V.; Cipriani, M.; Galassi, A.R. Screening and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162709

AMA Style

Vadalà G, Alaimo C, Buccheri G, Di Fazio L, Di Caccamo L, Sucato V, Cipriani M, Galassi AR. Screening and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(16):2709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vadalà, Giuseppe, Chiara Alaimo, Giancarlo Buccheri, Luca Di Fazio, Leandro Di Caccamo, Vincenzo Sucato, Manlio Cipriani, and Alfredo Ruggero Galassi. 2023. "Screening and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates" Diagnostics 13, no. 16: 2709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162709

APA Style

Vadalà, G., Alaimo, C., Buccheri, G., Di Fazio, L., Di Caccamo, L., Sucato, V., Cipriani, M., & Galassi, A. R. (2023). Screening and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates. Diagnostics, 13(16), 2709. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop