Next Article in Journal
Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis in an Older Patient: How the Geriatric Approach Can Make a Difference
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Regulating Adaptive Controller for Oxygen Support to Severe Respiratory Distress Patients and Human Respiratory System Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone Measurement in the Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Novel Strategy to Fit and Validate Physiological Models: A Case Study of a Cardiorespiratory Model for Simulation of Incremental Aerobic Exercise

Diagnostics 2023, 13(5), 908; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050908
by Carlos A. Sarmiento 1,*, Leidy Y. Serna 2,3, Alher M. Hernández 1 and Miguel Á. Mañanas 2,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(5), 908; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050908
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 17 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computerized Decision Support Systems for Lung Ventilation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article verifies that there is a high degree of accuracy between the model and the measured data and that it can be used to detect the cardiopulmonary system. The innovation is high, but there are some issues that need to be modified. Minor comments 1. In the summary section, do not use the same connecting words. For example: also. change a synonym. 2. The horizontal coordinates of Figure 2 should be shown horizontally. 3. For each subfigure in the figure, please tabulate the serial number, e.g.: a, b, c ..... Specify this when citing in the text, e.g. Figure 2a. 4. The text removes the see from the brackets. 5.1077-1081 lines, bolded in brackets removed, uniform formatting.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this work, the authors proposed a fitting and validation strategy of physiological models with many parameters, considering different populations and stimuli. The following lists some comments. The first is about the steps of this kind of parameter identification. Although the framework present a strategy, however, the main steps are not clarified. They are not specified as funtional sections, just list all of them. Second, the current parameter identification technique. The comparison study is needed. For different settings, different methods might be useful. Thus, the authors need specify the problems of the proposed method. Third is about the findings. It is good to perform a case study of ardiorespiratory model for simulation of incremental aerobic exercise. However, the implications as well as the medical implications need be strengthened, especailly for the new findings.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed most of my former comments.

Back to TopTop