Next Article in Journal
PET/CT Imaging of Infectious Diseases: Overview of Novel Radiopharmaceuticals
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Chest Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography as Predictors of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Prospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of QRS Complex and ST-Segment in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients with ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study

by
Srđan Maletin
1,2,
Milovan Petrović
1,2,
Anastazija Stojšić-Milosavljević
1,2,
Tatjana Miljković
1,2,
Aleksandra Milovančev
1,2,
Ivan Petrović
1,
Isidora Milosavljević
1,
Ana Balenović
1 and
Milenko Čanković
1,2,*
1
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(10), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101042
Submission received: 29 February 2024 / Revised: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 9 May 2024 / Published: 17 May 2024

Abstract

:
Background: as a relatively high number of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients develop major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), our aim was to determine the significance, and possible predictive value of QRS complex width and ST-segment elevation. Methods: our patient sample included 200 PCI-treated STEMI patients, which were divided into two groups based on the following duration of symptoms: (I) less than 6 h, and (II) 6 to 12 h. For every patient, an ECG was performed at six different time points, patients were followed for up to six years for the occurrence of MACE. Results: the mean age was 60.6 ± 11.39 years, and 142 (71%) were male. The 6–12 h group had significantly wider QRS complex, higher ST-segment elevation, lower prevalence of ST-segment resolution as well as MACE prevalence (p < 0.05). ECG parameters, QRS width, and magnitude of ST-segment elevation were proved to be independent significant predictors of MACE in all measured time points (p < 0.05). Even after controlling for biomarkers of myocardial injury, these ECG parameters remained statistically significant predictors of MACE (p < 0.05). Conclusion: our study highlights that wider QRS complex and a more pronounced ST-segment elevation are associated with longer total ischemic time and higher risk of long-term MACE.

1. Introduction

Even though there have been improvements in the management of ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), as the most serious subtype of coronary artery disease, it still represents a significant factor in global mortality [1]. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and pharmacological treatments have improved survival rates for patients with STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction). However, in patients who survive the acute phase of STEMI, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [2,3] represent a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality, with a reported prevalence of to 15%, even after a successful PCI procedure. Current recommendations emphasize the need for effective measures in MACE risk reduction [3,4]. The incidence of MACE ranges from 4.2% to 51%, and some of the risk factors are established atherosclerotic disease, triple vessel disease, stent implantation, hypertension, uric acid levels, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [4,5,6]. In patients undergoing PCI, short-term mortality has been extensively studied. However, long-term mortality remains an understudied research objective [7].
The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) represents the most utilized method for diagnosing, triaging, and determining appropriate treatment in STEMI patients [8]. As one of the most commonly used methods in clinical practice, it allows for an immediate risk assessment of acute coronary syndrome patients [9,10]. Even though it is a well-established diagnostic tool, different ECG presentations of acute myocardial ischemia, in terms of prognosis, are not well defined [9]. The QRS complex morphology, and ST-segment changes, have already been described as potential predictors of certain outcomes. The authors analyzed the role of poor R wave progression, with a dominant QS pattern in V3, in reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) prediction, as well as the impact of QRS complex width on left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), heart failure (HF), and death [11,12]. Lately, fragmented QRS (fQRS) and QRS distortion, emerged as novel predictors of reperfusion success [8].
Based on ST-segments resolution, we can identify successful recanalization of infarct-related arteries (IRA) after thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction patients [13], as well as in those patients with reduced chance of receiving benefits from early flow restoration in IRA [14].
Although ECG is commonly used in clinical practice, its elements such as the QRS complex and ST-segment have not been extensively evaluated as MACE predictors in STEMI patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential of these ECG elements as predictors of long-term MACE in STEMI patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample and Group Formation

This longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted at the tertiary cardiovascular center and was approved by the ethics committee of the institution. The study included patients that were hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of STEMI from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018.
The inclusion criteria for this study were the following: (I) patients older than 18 years, (II) patients with first presentation of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation treated with PCI, and (III) the symptoms duration lasted less than 12 h.
The exclusion criteria were the following: (I) additional comorbidities, which could influence the patients’ outcomes, (II) patients with previous myocardial infarction, with or without ST-segment elevation, (III) structural heart diseases, (IV) patients with a previously performed surgical revascularization procedure, (V) patients in the state of cardiogenic shock during the admission, (VI) left or right bundle branch block detected during the admission, (VII) patients with the atrioventricular block of the second or third degree, (VIII) patients with a permanent or temporary pacemaker, (IX) patients with disbalance of electrolytes that could influence the ECG (e.g., calcium and potassium levels), (X) contraindications for the administration of antiplatelet drugs, (XI) patients with no need for further intervention after coronary angiography was performed, and (XII) patients who were not compliant. The data regarding the patient’s risk factors, comorbidities, clinical findings at admission, length of hospitalization, echocardiographic findings, and intrahospital mortality were collected from the electronic medical records. follow-up data were collected during the regular check-up examinations of the patients.
Consecutive patents who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Based on the duration of the symptoms to balloon time, patients were divided into the following two groups: (I) Group A, in which symptoms lasted up to 6 h from the onset to the balloon, and (II) Group B, in which symptoms lasted from 6 to 12 h from the onset to the balloon. The target number of the patients was same for the both groups and it was one hundred.
On admission and during index hospitalization the following data were collected: (I) demographic data, (II) functional status, assessed through the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, Killip classification, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina scale, (III) data about myocardial infarction localization, culprit vessel, and performed treatment, (IV) laboratory data, measuring creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) and troponin I (TnI), (V) hospitalization data, (VI) echocardiographic findings, and (VII) ECG data.

2.2. Electrocardiographic Data

Electrocardiography (ECG) was performed for every patient. Recording was performed on a Schiller AT-102, Baar, Switzerland ECG machine at the speed of 50 mm/s and a gain of 10 mm/mV to obtain a high precision rate. The ECG parameters were measured manually using a graduated lens. The sum of the ST elevations was measured in all 12 derivations in three consecutive cardiac cycles and then averaged. The measurements were taken at the following different time points: (I) on admission, prior to the PCI procedure, (II) immediately after the PCI procedure, (III) an hour after the PCI procedure, (IV) on the third day of hospitalization, (V) at the one month follow-up, and (VI) at the six months follow-up. The ST-segment resolution was defined as a decrease of more than 50% of the initial ST-segment elevation, measured in millimeters.

2.3. Coronary Angiography

All patients underwent urgent coronary angiography which was performed at the Siemens Artis zee Forchheim, Germany, catheterization laboratory. Usually, the right radial artery was the preferred access point for vascular entry. However, if this was not possible, the femoral artery was used. The coronary ostia were then cannulated, and contrast was injected to assess the coronary arteries. Significant stenoses were major epicardial vessels or their branches with stenosis greater than 70%, or left main stenosis greater than 50%, which required intervention. These vessels underwent PCI with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with or without stenting. The stents used were drug-eluting stents.

2.4. Echocardiography

All subjects underwent two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) using a Vivid E9 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) machine that was equipped with an M5S-D, 1.5–4.6 MHz transducer with continuous ECG monitoring during the examination. All measurements and calculations were performed via the previously described methods according to the standardized procedures of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society for Echocardiography. Different parameters were measured and compared [15].

2.5. Patient Follow-Up

The total follow-up period was six years with a mean follow-up period of 2025.5 (1964–2395.5) days, during which data were collected at two-time points of six months (short-term) and at the end of the study after six years of the study onset (long-term). For the short-term follow-up, patients were assessed during the regular exams, while for the long-term outcome follow-up, patients were contacted via telephone. During this time, the absolute number of losses in follow-up patients was 23, including 14 in group A, and 9 in group B, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.380). After discharge, all patients were followed up for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included the following: myocardial reinfarction, the need for an additional PCI procedure of both culprit and non-culprit vessels, heart failure, stroke, and cardiovascular death. For this part of the analysis, patients were divided into the following two groups: (I) patients with MACE, and (II) patients without MACE.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The collected data were divided into subcategories, based on their similarities, and were analyzed on the following three levels: (I) the whole sample, (II) patients with symptoms duration of more than 6 h (Group A), and (III) patients with symptom duration of less than 6 h. Python 3.10.6 was used as the programming language in this research. Categorization of the variables followed, in which the division was made into categorical and continuous groups, and variables were analyzed using adequate tests. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentages), and the Chi-squared test was used to determine differences between the two groups. Continuous variables were presented as medians (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed via Student t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, based on sample normality using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Two-tailed tests were used, and statistical significance was observed at a level p < 0.05, for every variable. Using binary regression analysis, the odds ratios of developing adverse cardiovascular events were determined. The predictive value of ECG measurements was determined via the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Patients Characteristics

In Table 1, data from index hospitalization are presented. Out of 200 patients with a mean age of 60.6 ± 11.39 years, 142 were male and 58 were female. STEMI patients had high prevalence of hypertension 63%, 32% had family history of cardiovascular diseases, and 18% had diabetes. The group with symptoms duration of less than 6 h had a significantly lower heart rate 77.5 bpm (IQR 65–85) vs. 79 bpm (IQR 70.0–86.25), p = 0.035). The most prevalent infarct-related artery (IRA) differed between groups since the right coronary artery was more common in group A, while the left anterior descending artery was more common in group B. Markers of myocardial injury (CK-MB and TnI) were significantly higher in group B, during all four measurements. Length of hospitalization was not significantly different between the observed groups (six days (IQR 5–7) vs. five days (IQR 5–7), p = 0.265). The left ventricle ejection fraction value was significantly lower in group B, (50.0% (IQR 46.0–55.0) vs. 48.0% (IQR 42.0–55.0), p = 0.024), and 6-month follow-up (55.0% (IQR 50.0–57.5) vs. 50.0% (IQR 45.0–55.0), p = 0.001). Additional information about the PCI procedure and culprit vessels are stored in Table S1.
After the inclusion, 3% of patients had deteriorated.

3.2. ECG Data

3.2.1. QRS Complex Width Measurement

The QRS complex width were significantly shorter in group with symptoms duration of less than 6 h (Table 2), 60 min post-PCI (86.5 msec (IQR 80.0–100.0) vs. 100.0 msec (IQR 87.25–100.0), p = 0.008), 72-h post-PCI (81.0 msec (IQR 80.0–90.5) vs. 95.0 msec (IQR 85.0–100.0), p = 0.001), one month after (80.0 msec (IQR 80.0–90.0) vs. 90.0 msec (IQR 85.0–100.0), p = 0.001), and six months after (80.0 msec (IQR 80.0–90.0) vs. 90.0 msec (IQR 80.0–100.0), p = 0.001).

3.2.2. ST-Segment Elevation

ST-segment elevation was lower in group with symptoms’ duration of less than 6 h (Table 2) 60 min post-PCI (0.5 mm (IQR 0.0–1.0) vs. 1.0 mm (IQR 0.0–2.0), p = 0.005), 72-h post-PCI (0.0 mm (IQR 0.0–0.5) vs. 0.5 mm (IQR 0.0–1.0), p = 0.001), one month after (0.0 mm (IQR 0.0–0.0) vs. 0.0 mm (IQR 0.0–0.5), p = 0.003), and six months after (0.0 mm (IQR 0.0–0.0) vs. 0.0 mm (IQR 0.0–0.0), p = 0.013). After the PCI procedure, ST-segment resolution was significantly more prevalent in group A compared to group B (72% vs. 49%, p = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences observed between the groups at other time points.

3.3. Follow-Up Data

3.3.1. 6-Month Follow-Up

Out of 200 patients, 32 had MACE during a 6-month period. MACE was more common in group B (9% vs. 23%, p = 0.012). The most frequent was heart failure (n = 28), which was more abundant in group B (6% vs. 22%, p = 0.002). During this period, six patients died. The majority of them (n = 5) died out of the hospital, while one died during the hospitalization. All patients died due to a coronary event (Table 3). Additional data are stored in Table S2.

3.3.2. 6-Year Follow-Up

During this extensive follow-up period, 44 patients had MACE. The most common one was cardiovascular death (n = 14), followed by re-PCI of the non-culprit vessel (n = 10), and reinfarction (n = 7). Taking into consideration the time frame from the PCI procedure until the MACE, it was determined that MACE happened earlier in group B (2287 days (IQR 1874–2476) vs. 1854 days (IQR 615–2208), p = 0.001). All follow-up data are presented in Table 3.

3.4. ECG Data in MACE Prediction

3.4.1. Value of QRS Complex Width in Association with MACE

A wider QRS complex was significantly associated with a higher possibility of developing a 6-year MACE, at all time points of measurement. A QRS width increase of 1 msec above 99 msec width after a month increased the risk of MACE for 4.2% (OR = 1.042, 95% CI 1.012–1.074, p = 0.007). An increase in pre-PCI QRS complex width by 1 msec above 99 msec width increased the risk of MACE by 3% (OR = 1.028, 95% CI 1.003–1.053, p = 0.029). All results are presented in Table 3. The highest AUC value was displayed by the QRS complex 60 min after the PCI procedure (AUC = 0.74) (Figure 1a).

3.4.2. Value of ST-Segment Elevation in Association with MACE

During all time points of measurement, a higher ST-segment elevation was associated with a higher possibility of developing a 6-year MACE (Table 4), p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001. The strongest predictor was the one-month ST-segment elevation (OR = 3.256, 95% CI 1.572–6.747, p = 0.001). An increase in ST-segment elevation after one month by 1mm increased the risk of MACE by 3.26 times. All results are presented in Table 5. The highest AUC values were demonstrated 60 min after the PCI (AUC = 0.75) (Figure 1b).
In the model where QRS width pre-PCI controlled for CPK and TNI QRS width remained significant (Table 6).
The same was observed when ST-segment elevation was controlled for CPK and TNI (Table 7). ST elevation pre-PCI increased for 1 mm controlled for troponin and CPK increased the risk of MACE by 16% (OR = 1.16, 95%CI 1.02–1.32, p = 0.019).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that analyzed the possible utilization of QRS complex width and ST-segment elevation in long-term MACE prediction. Patients showing symptoms lasting from 6 to 12 h had higher levels of myocardial injury markers (CK-MB and TnI) and their echocardiograms revealed lower left ventricle EF values, indicating reduced myocardial function. This group also exhibited wider QRS complex, higher ST-segment elevation at almost all time points with a lower prevalence of ST-segment resolution and a higher prevalence of MACE. Both the width of the QRS complex and the elevation of the ST-segment were significantly associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at all measured time points. An increase of 1msec of pre-PCI QRS complex width significantly increased the risk of 6-year MACE by 2.8%, and an increase in 1mvol pre-PCI ST-segment elevation increased the risk by 61%.
The group with a shorter onset-to-treatment time (OTT) exhibited lower HR. In previously published research, the increased elevated admission HR in PCI-treated STEMI patients was a strong, independent predictor of adverse outcomes and mortality. A value of HR greater than 80 beats per minute (bpm) could identify patients with an increased risk of death. However, it is not certain whether HR reduction results in improved outcomes [15,16,17]. In the available literature, patients with longer symptom onset-to-door time (SODT) had poorer prognoses and worse survival rates. Some of the factors influencing SODT may be older age, ethnicity, and diabetes mellitus, as well as the technical aspect of healthcare-providing [18]. It was shown that during ‘’on-hours’’ (work days), patients more commonly contacted physicians, rather than the emergency services, which led to increased SODT [19]. As time-to-treatment is directly associated with infarct size, minimizing any component of treatment delay and emphasizing shorter onset-to-treatment time in STEMI patients is imperative for decreasing mortality and improving outcomes [20,21]. In our patient group with longer OTT, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower, possibly due to the more extensive myocardial involvement. Decreased LVEF is an important predictor of cardiac prognosis, and reduced values are seen in up to 40% of STEMI patients [22,23].
In our sample, a significantly wider QRS complex was observed in the group with longer OTT, at almost all time points of measurement. In previous research, changes in the QRS complex and the value of the QRS score were associated with the size of the infarcted area [24,25]. As longer OTT leads to more extensive myocardial necrosis [20], our findings are expected as larger infarction results in wider QRS complex. These findings are in line with the current literature, as QRS complex and its elements are established predictors of cardiac risk, mortality, and outcomes of STEMI patients [8,26,27]. However, QRS width has not been extensively studied as a predictor of adverse events. In our analysis, ST-segment elevation measured 72 h after the PCI procedure showed the highest statistical difference between the observed groups. Similar to the previous parameter, ST-segment elevation was more significantly pronounced in the longer OTT group, while ST-segment resolution was more commonly absent in the same group. Lack of ST-segment resolution, as well as higher elevation, were previously associated with larger infarct size, leading to worse patient outcomes, and lower LVEF [28,29,30,31,32,33]. As total ischemic time (TIT) was longer in the previously mentioned group, this finding strongly supports the idea that the infarct volume highly depends on the ischemic time.
During long-term follow-up, 24.6% of patients had MACE. It was more common in the longer OTT group, and the most prevalent type was cardiovascular death, followed by re-PCI of the non-culprit vessel. There is a wide range of MACE prevalence rate in the reported literature of 4.2% to 51%. Risk factors, such as established atherosclerotic disease, triple vessel disease, stent implantation, hypertension, diabetes, and decreased kidney function, were showed to be significant predictors of MACE [4,5,6]. In our cohort, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the risk factors, so the main possible explanation could be prolonged ischemic time, resulting in more extensive myocardial lesions. Even though reperfusion is the main therapeutic aim in STEMI patients, it is well known that it can be followed by a myocardial reperfusion injury (MRI) [34]. Myocardial damage during an acute myocardial infarction is a result of an interplay between ischemia and following reperfusion. Consequently, numerous conditions arise, such as ventricular arrhythmias, myocardial stunning, microvascular obstructions (MVO), as well as intramyocardial hemorrhage. All of these can significantly influence patient outcomes [35]. The size of the myocardial infarction and MVO represent independent predictors for long-term mortality, as well as the development of HF in these patients [36,37]. According to the latest European Cardiology Society (ESC) guidelines for acute coronary syndrome treatment, the strategies for reducing ischemic-reperfusion lesions are still an unfulfilled clinical need [38], as well as a potential focus of future research. Due to extensive myocardial injury, leading to previously described changes in QRS complex width, and ST-segment elevation, these ECG elements have demonstrated certain predictive power, in terms of MACE. The highest AUC value was shown by the QRS complex (AUC = 0.74) width and ST-segment elevation (AUC = 0.75) 60 min after the PCI procedure.
Deng W. et al. in recent publication concluded that there is the rising number of modeling studies with questionable predictability and that there is a need for external validation. Our paper analyzed two ECG parameters whose utility in practice is easy and simple. Both ECG parameters, QRS width and magnitude of ST-segment elevation, were proved to be independent significant predictors of MACE in all measured time points. Even after controlling for biomarkers of myocardial injury, these ECG parameters remained statistically significant predictors of MACE. We hypothesize that these simple ECG parameters could be used on admission, during hospitalization, and in follow-up to identify patients with increased risk of MACE. When analyzing ROC curves, these parameters showed moderate sensitivity and specificity, however, we found that there was a good correlation of these parameters with MACE. One of the biggest limitations in these parameters is that they can be affected by conduction system disorders, etc. Therefore, these parameters should be used in patients with the first manifestation of STEMI without prior structural and rhythmical disorders. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article to analyze the dynamics of ST-segment resolution and QRS complex width simultaneously as predictors of long-term adverse events. Previous studies, such as those by van der Zwaan and Ndrepepa, have analyzed early changes in ST-segment resolution after pPCI. However, their findings show no impact on long-term outcomes. It is worth noting that these studies only observed the ECG for a period of 120 min. Nevertheless, future research and external validation might include these easily measured ECG parameters in predictive models, where their real predictive power would be obtained [39,40,41].

5. Conclusions

To the best of our understanding, this study represents pioneering research that utilized QRS complex width and ST-segment elevation in the context of predicting long-term major adverse cardiovascular events. Wider QRS complex and more pronounced ST-segment elevation were associated with longer total ischemic time (TIT) at all time points of measurement, accompanied by the absence of ST-segment resolution. Longer ischemic time led to more frequent manifestations of a 6-year MACE, which developed in a shorter time frame compared to the group of patients in which the PCI procedure was completed in less than 6 h. QRS width and magnitude of ST-segment elevation were proved to be independent significant predictors of MACE in all measured time points.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics14101042/s1, Table S1: Culprit vessel and treatment data; Table S2: Additional 6-month follow-up data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and M.Č.; methodology, A.M. and A.B.; software, I.P. and I.M.; validation, M.Č.; formal analysis, S.M.; investigation, S.M.; resources, A.B.; data curation, I.M. and I.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. and T.M.; writing—review and editing, M.Č., M.P. and A.S.-M.; visualization, I.M. and I.P.; supervision, A.S.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (100-¼, 24 January 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy reasons.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, M.; Pan, J.; Meng, K.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Ma, L.; Yu, X. Triglyceride-Glucose Body Mass Index Predicts Prognosis in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. He, J.; Kong, L.; An, D.; Chen, B.; Zhao, C.; Li, Z.; Yang, F.; Dong, J.; Wei, L.; Shan, P.; et al. Prognostic Value of Segmental Strain After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the EARLY Assessment of MYOcardial Tissue Characteristics by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (EARLY-MYO-CMR) Study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giustino, G.; Mehran, R.; Dangas, G.D.; Kirtane, A.J.; Redfors, B.; Généreux, P.; Brener, S.J.; Prats, J.; Pocock, S.J.; Deliargyris, E.N.; et al. Characterization of the Average Daily Ischemic and Bleeding Risk After Primary PCI for STEMI. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 1846–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tsai, I.-T.; Wang, C.-P.; Lu, Y.-C.; Hung, W.-C.; Wu, C.-C.; Lu, L.-F.; Chung, F.-M.; Hsu, C.-C.; Lee, Y.-J.; Yu, T.-H. The Burden of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord 2017, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Poudel, I.; Tejpal, C.; Rashid, H.; Jahan, N. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: An Inevitable Outcome of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction? A Literature Review. Cureus 2019, 11, e5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Miao, B.; Hernandez, A.V.; Alberts, M.J.; Mangiafico, N.; Roman, Y.M.; Coleman, C.I. Incidence and Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Established Atherosclerotic Disease or Multiple Risk Factors. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e014402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pedersen, F.; Butrymovich, V.; Kelbæk, H.; Wachtell, K.; Helqvist, S.; Kastrup, J.; Holmvang, L.; Clemmensen, P.; Engstrøm, T.; Grande, P.; et al. Short- and Long-Term Cause of Death in Patients Treated with Primary PCI for STEMI. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 2101–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tanriverdi, Z.; Dursun, H.; Simsek, M.A.; Unal, B.; Kozan, O.; Kaya, D. The Predictive Value of Fragmented QRS and QRS Distortion for High-Risk Patients with STEMI and for the Reperfusion Success. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2015, 20, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Savonitto, S.; Ardissino, D.; Granger, C.B.; Morando, G.; Prando, M.D.; Mafrici, A.; Cavallini, C.; Melandri, G.; Thompson, T.D.; Vahanian, A.; et al. Prognostic Value of the Admission Electrocardiogram in Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA 1999, 281, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rafie, N.; Kashou, A.H.; Noseworthy, P.A. ECG Interpretation: Clinical Relevance, Challenges, and Advances. Hearts 2021, 2, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alhamaydeh, M.; Gregg, R.; Ahmad, A.; Faramand, Z.; Saba, S.; Al-Zaiti, S. Identifying the Most Important ECG Predictors of Reduced Ejection Fraction in Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. J. Electrocardiol. 2020, 61, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. López-Castillo, M.; Aceña, Á.; Pello-Lázaro, A.M.; Viegas, V.; Merchán Muñoz, B.; Carda, R.; Franco-Peláez, J.; Martín-Mariscal, M.L.; Briongos-Figuero, S.; Tuñón, J. Prognostic Value of Initial QRS Analysis in Anterior STEMI: Correlation with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, Serum Biomarkers, and Cardiac Outcomes. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021, 26, e12791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Buszman, P.; Szafranek, A.; Kalarus, Z.; Gasior, M. Use of Changes in ST Segment Elevation for Prediction of Infarct Artery Recanalization in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Eur. Heart J. 1995, 16, 1207–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Matetzky, S.; Novikov, M.; Gruberg, L.; Freimark, D.; Feinberg, M.; Elian, D.; Novikov, I.; Di, S.E.; Agranat, O.; Har-Zahav, Y.; et al. The Significance of Persistent ST Elevation versus Early Resolution of ST Segment Elevation after Primary PTCA. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1999, 34, 1932–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lang, R.M.; Badano, L.P.; Mor-Avi, V.; Afilalo, J.; Armstrong, A.; Ernande, L.; Voigt, J.U. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 1–39.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Resting Heart Rate and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from a 10-Year Follow-Up of the CORFCHD-PCI Study. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/crp/2019/5432076/ (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  17. Noman, A.; Balasubramaniam, K.; Das, R.; Ang, D.; Kunadian, V.; Ivanauskiene, T.; Zaman, A.G. Admission Heart Rate Predicts Mortality Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Study. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2013, 31, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wah, W.; Pek, P.P.; Ho, A.F.W.; Fook-Chong, S.; Zheng, H.; Loy, E.Y.; Chua, T.S.J.; Koh, T.H.; Chow, K.Y.; Earnest, A.; et al. Symptom-to-Door Delay among Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Singapore. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2017, 29, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hafiz, A.M.; Naidu, S.S.; DeLeon, J.; Islam, S.; Alkhatib, B.; Lorenz, M.; D’Elia, A.; Rosenthal, B.; Marzo, K. Impact of First Contact on Symptom Onset–to-Door Time in Patients Presenting for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2013, 31, 922–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Luca, G.; Parodi, G.; Sciagrà, R.; Venditti, F.; Bellandi, B.; Vergara, R.; Migliorini, A.; Valenti, R.; Antoniucci, D. Time-to-Treatment and Infarct Size in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 167, 1508–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Symptom Onset-to-Balloon Time and Mortality in the First Seven Years After STEMI Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention|Heart. Available online: https://heart.bmj.com/content/98/23/1738.short (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  22. Birdal, O.; Pay, L.; Aksakal, E.; Yumurtaş, A.Ç.; Çinier, G.; Yücel, E.; Tanboğa, İ.H.; Karagöz, A.; Oduncu, V. Naples Prognostic Score and Prediction of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in STEMI Patients. Angiology 2024, 75, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lazăr, M.-A.; Ionac, I.; Luca, C.-T.; Petrescu, L.; Vacarescu, C.; Crisan, S.; Gaiță, D.; Cozma, D.; Sosdean, R.; Arnăutu, D.-A.; et al. Reduced Left Ventricular Twist Early after Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction as a Predictor of Left Ventricular Adverse Remodelling. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Evaluation of a QRS Scoring System for Estimating Myocardial Infarct Size. I. Specificity and Observer Agreement. Circulation. Available online: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/01.CIR.65.2.342 (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  25. QRS Score at Presentation Electrocardiogram Is Correlated with Infarct Size and Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Available online: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/81/8/81_CJ-16-1255/_article/-char/ja/ (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  26. Das, M.K.; Michael, M.A.; Suradi, H.; Peng, J.; Sinha, A.; Shen, C.; Mahenthiran, J.; Kovacs, R.J. Usefulness of Fragmented QRS on a 12-Lead Electrocardiogram in Acute Coronary Syndrome for Predicting Mortality. Am. J. Cardiol. 2009, 104, 1631–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, J.; Cao, X.; He, S.; Yang, D. Both Baseline Selvester QRS Score and Change in QRS Score Predict Prognosis in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Coron. Artery Dis. 2020, 31, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rodríguez-Palomares, J.F.; Figueras-Bellot, J.; Descalzo, M.; Moral, S.; Otaegui, I.; Pineda, V.; del Blanco, B.G.; González-Alujas, M.T.; Evangelista Masip, A.; García-Dorado, D. Relation of ST-Segment Elevation Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty to Left Ventricular Area at Risk, Myocardial Infarct Size, and Systolic Function. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014, 113, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weaver, J.C.; Ramsay, D.D.; Rees, D.; Binnekamp, M.F.; Prasan, A.M.; McCrohon, J.A. Dynamic Changes in ST Segment Resolution After Myocardial Infarction and the Association with Microvascular Injury on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Heart Lung Circ. 2011, 20, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dizon, J.M.; Brener, S.J.; Maehara, A.; Witzenbichler, B.; Biviano, A.; Godlewski, J.; Parise, H.; Dambrink, J.-H.; Mehran, R.; Gibson, C.M.; et al. Relationship between ST-Segment Resolution and Anterior Infarct Size after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis from the INFUSE-AMI Trial. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2014, 3, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Prognostic Impact of Early ST-Segment Resolution in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction|Circulation. Available online: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.CIR.0000147778.05979.E6 (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  32. Rakowski, T.; Dziewierz, A.; Siudak, Z.; Mielecki, W.; Brzozowska-Czarnek, A.; Legutko, J.; Rzeszutko, L.; Urbanik, A.; Dubiel, J.S.; Dudek, D. ST-Segment Resolution Assessed Immediately after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Correlates with Infarct Size and Left Ventricular Function in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 1-Year Follow-Up. J. Electrocardiol. 2009, 42, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Haeck, J.D.E.; Verouden, N.J.W.; Kuijt, W.J.; Koch, K.T.; Majidi, M.; Hirsch, A.; Tijssen, J.G.P.; Krucoff, M.W.; De Winter, R.J. Impact of Early, Late, and No ST-Segment Resolution Measured by Continuous ST Holter Monitoring on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Infarct Size as Determined by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Electrocardiol. 2011, 44, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Røsand, Ø.; Høydal, M.A. Cardiac Exosomes in Ischemic Heart Disease—A Narrative Review. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fröhlich, G.M.; Meier, P.; White, S.K.; Yellon, D.M.; Hausenloy, D.J. Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: Looking beyond Primary PCI. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stone, G.W.; Selker, H.P.; Thiele, H.; Patel, M.R.; Udelson, J.E.; Ohman, E.M.; Maehara, A.; Eitel, I.; Granger, C.B.; Jenkins, P.L.; et al. Relationship Between Infarct Size and Outcomes Following Primary PCI: Patient-Level Analysis from 10 Randomized Trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1674–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. de Waha, S.; Patel, M.R.; Granger, C.B.; Ohman, E.M.; Maehara, A.; Eitel, I.; Ben-Yehuda, O.; Jenkins, P.; Thiele, H.; Stone, G.W. Relationship between Microvascular Obstruction and Adverse Events Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis from Seven Randomized Trials. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 3502–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Byrne, R.A.; Rossello, X.; Coughlan, J.J.; Barbato, E.; Berry, C.; Chieffo, A.; Claeys, M.J.; Dan, G.-A.; Dweck, M.R.; Galbraith, M.; et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2023, 44, 3720–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Deng, W.; Wang, D.; Wan, Y.; Lai, S.; Ding, Y.; Wang, X. Prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 10, 1287434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. van der Zwaan, H.B.; Stoel, M.G.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Veen, G.; Boersma, E.; von Birgelen, C. Early versus late ST-segment resolution and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Neth. Heart J. 2010, 18, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ndrepepa, G.; Alger, P.; Kufner, S.; Mehilli, J.; Schömig, A.; Kastrati, A. ST-segment resolution after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiol. J. 2012, 19, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Receiver operator characteristic curves for: (a) QRS complex width, based on the time point of measurement; (b) ST-segment elevation, based on the time point of measurement.
Figure 1. Receiver operator characteristic curves for: (a) QRS complex width, based on the time point of measurement; (b) ST-segment elevation, based on the time point of measurement.
Diagnostics 14 01042 g001
Table 1. Basic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients’ characteristics.
Table 1. Basic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients’ characteristics.
VariablesWhole Sample
(n = 200)
n (%)
Mean ± SD
Median [IQR]
Symptoms Duration of Less than 6 h (n = 100)
Median [IQR]
%
Symptoms Duration of Less than 6 h (n = 100)
Median [IQR]
%
p Value
Sex 1.000
Female58 (29%)2929
Male142 (71%)7171
Age (years)60.6 ±   11.3958.5 [52.0–67.0]60.0 [52.0–74.0]0.154
Height (cm)173.1 [165–180]175.0 [166.75–180.0]175.0 [165.0–180.0]0.463
Weight (kg)82.6 [75–90]82.0 [75.0–90.0]80.0 [70.0–90.0]0.299
Body mass index (kg/m2)27.5 [24.7–29.4]26.8 [25.24–29.55]26.45 [24.35–29.4]0.426
Body surface area (m2)2.0 ±   0.22.0 [1.87–2.08]1.98 [1.83–2.12]0.301
Heart rate (beats/min)78.5 [65–85]77.5 [65.0–85.0]79.0 [70.0–86.25]0.035
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)141.0 [126.3–153.8]140.0 [120.0–150.0]140.0 [130.0–160.0]0.131
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)82.4 [70–90]80.0 [70.0–90.0]80.0 [80.0–90.0]0.437
Vascular risk factors and comorbidities
Hypertension126 (63%)65610.660
Diabetes mellitus36 (18%)17190.854
Family history63 (32%)32311.000
Kidney function
Creatinine (micromol/L)96.6   ±     24.1 93.0 [79.0–108.25]94.0 [81.75–106.25]0.829
Clearance (mL/min)
>9089 (45%)50390.155
60–9080 (40%)40401.000
45–5923 (12%)7160.076
30–444 (2%)221.000
15–294 (2%)130.614
Duration of the symptoms (min)304.3 [120–420]120.0 [90.0–180.0]420.0 [360.0–600.0]0.001
Killip
1128 (64%)72560.027
1/24 (2%)130.614
256 (28%)24320.270
2/36 (3%)150.214
34 (2%)040.130
42 (1%)200.477
Post-MI NYHA status
1175 (88%)89860.669
218 (9%)1170.459
2/32 (1%)020.477
31 (0.5%)011.000
44 (2%)040.130
Post-MI CCS
0188 (94%)95930.766
19 (5%)451.000
21 (1%)011.000
31 (1%)011.000
41 (1%)101.000
Myocardial injury assessment
Creatine Kinase isoenzyme MB (CKMB)
Pre-PCI61.5 [24–68.5]27.5 [21.0–35.25]59.0 [36.0–110.0]0.001
6-h285.1 [147.3–447.8]244.0 [122.25–376.25]345.5 [168.0–500.0]0.007
24-h148.1 [74.3–189.8]107.0 [72.25–188.0]139.5 [81.0–194.25]0.324
72-h38.7 [24–41]30.0 [21.75–38.0]32.0 [25.0–45.0]0.040
Troponin I (TnI)
Pre-PCI1.4 [0.1–1.5]0.04 [0.01–0.2]1.29 [0.37–3.46]0.001
6-h17.7 [6.6–30.0]11.43 [5.26–29.2]25.0 [10.1–30.0]0.001
24-h12.9 [4.3–16.1]7.65 [3.3–14.89]10.42 [5.5–16.9]0.575
72-h3.4 [1.1–4.3]2.21 [1.04–3.64]3.1 [1.2–4.77]0.074
In-hospital stay length (days)6.2 [5–7]6.0 [5.0–7.0]5.0 [5.0–7.0]0.265
Intrahospital complications0 (0%)001.000
Without176 (88%)88881.000
Ventricular thrombus4 (2%)221.000
Pericardial effusion5 (3%)140.365
Ventricular fibrillation11 (6%)830.215
Pulseless electrical activity1 (1%)101.000
Cardiac tamponade1 (1%)011.000
Stroke1 (1%)011.000
In-hospital death1 (1%)011.000
Echocardiographic assessment
In-hospital FSLV35.0   ±   7.334.7 [29.55–38.42]35.95 [32.6–40.15]0.254
In-hospital EFLV48.9   ±   7.450.0 [46.0–55.0]48.0 [42.0–55.0]0.024
In-hospital LVIDs3.2 ±   0.63.2 [2.9–3.5]3.15 [2.8–3.5]0.647
In-hospital LVIDd4.9   ±     0.4 4.9 [4.6–5.2]4.9 [4.6–5.22]0.823
In-hospital LVEDV102.0 [81–117]94.0 [84.0–115.25]97.0 [78.5–121.5]0.787
In-hospital LVESV52.6 [39–63]48.0 [40.88–60.0]50.0 [36.25–65.0]0.727
In-hospital MADd3.0 [2.9–3.2]3.0 [2.9–3.2]3.0 [2.9–3.1]0.374
In-hospital mitral regurgitation
059 (30%)26330.352
0/15 (3%)410.365
164 (32%)38260.095
1/231 (16%)11200.118
234 (17%)19150.572
2/37 (4%)250.442
NYHA, New York Heart Association; CCS, Canadian Cardiology Society; PCI, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; FSLV, Fractional Shortening of the Left Ventricle; EFLV, Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction; LVIDs, Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in Systole; LVIDd, Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in Diastole; LVEDV, Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume; LVESV, Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume; MADd, Mitral Annulus Diameter Dimension.
Table 2. ECG characteristics at baseline and during the follow-up.
Table 2. ECG characteristics at baseline and during the follow-up.
VariablesWhole Sample (n = 200)
n (%)
Mean ± SD
Median [IQR]
Symptoms Duration of Less than 6 h (n = 100)
Median [IQR]
%
Symptoms Duration of Less than 6 h (n = 100 Median [IQR]
%
p Value
Dynamics of the QRS complex (msec)
Pre-PCI QRS width100.5 ±   12.7 100.0 [90.0–110.0]100.0 [93.5–110.0]0.463
Post-PCI QRS width98.8   ±   15.195.0 [85.0–100.0]100.0 [90.0–110.0]0.111
60-min QRS width94.7   ±   13.3 86.5 [80.0–100.0]100.0 [87.25–100.0]0.008
72-h QRS width89.8   ±   11.5 81.0 [80.0–90.5]95.0 [85.0–100.0]0.001
1-month QRS width87.9   ±   10.6 80.0 [80.0–90.0]90.0 [85.0–100.0]0.001
6-months QRS width87.7   ±   11.1 80.0 [80.0–90.0]90.0 [80.0–100.0]0.001
ST-segment elevation (mm)
Pre-PCI3. 8 [2–5]3.5 [2.5–5.0]3.0 [2.0–5.0]0.064
Post-PCI1.9 [0.5–3]1.0 [0.0–2.5]2.0 [0.5–3.0]0.051
60-min1 [0–2]0.5 [0.0–1.0]1.0 [0.0–2.0]0.005
72-h0.5 [0–0.5]0.0 [0.0–0.5]0.5 [0.0–1.0]0.001
1-month0.2 [0–0.1]0.0 [0.0–0.0]0.0 [0.0–0.5]0.003
6-months0.1 [0–0.1]0.0 [0.0–0.0]0.0 [0.0–0.0]0.013
ST-segment resolution (>50%)
Post-PCI121 (61%)72490.001
60-min98 (49%)48500.888
72-h82 (41%)39430.666
1-month52 (26%)23290.420
6-months16 (8%)790.794
Newly formed branch block
No175 (88%)87881.000
Transitory RBBB2 (1%)111.000
Transitory LBBB9 (5%)720.172
Transitory LAHB4 (2%)221.000
Permanent LAHB5 (3%)140.365
Permanent ILBBB2 (1%)020.477
Permanent RBBB2 (1%)200.477
PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention; RBBB, Right Bundle Branch Block; LBBB, Left Bundle Branch Block; LAHB, Left Anterior Hemiblock; ILBBB, Incomplete Bundle Branch Block.
Table 3. MACE in STEMI patients.
Table 3. MACE in STEMI patients.
VariablesWhole Sample (n = 200)
n (%)
Mean ± SD
Median [IQR]
Symptoms Duration of Less than 6 h (n = 100)
(%)
Median [IQR]
Symptoms Duration of Less than 6 h (n = 100)
(%)
Median [IQR]
p Value
6-months follow-up data
In-hospital death1 (1%)011.000
Out-of-hospital death5 (3%)140.365
Coronary event-related death6 (3%)150.214
Reinfarction of the treated vessel1 (1%)101.000
Manifested HF28 (14%)6220.002
Stent thrombosis4 (2%)221.000
Clinically manifested restenosis2 (1%)020.477
Ventricular thrombus1 (1%)101.000
MACE32 (16%)9230.012
Dual Antiplatelet Treatment
Acetylsalicylic acid + Ticagrelor79 (40%)27520.001
Acetylsalicylic acid + Clopidogrel109 (55%)69400.001
Acetylsalicylic acid + Ticagrelor + Oral anticoagulant2 (1%)200.477
Acetylsalicylic acid + Clopidogrel + Oral anticoagulant9 (5%)270.172
Acetylsalicylic acid + Clopidogrel + Direct oral anticoagulant1 (1%)011.000
6-months NYHA
1171 (86%)94770.001
1/21 (1%)101.000
219 (10%)4150.016
2/31 (1%)011.000
32 (1%)020.477
3/41 (1%)011.000
6-months CCS
0174 (87%)86880.833
113 (7%)850.566
26 (3%)420.678
32 (1%)111.000
Echocardiographic assessment
6-months FSLV35.7 [32.7–40.0]35.8 [33.3–40.0]36.0 [32.65–39.25]0.572
6-months EFLV51.8 [48.8–57]55.0 [50.0–57.5]50.0 [45.0–55.0]0.001
6-months LVIDs3.2 [2.9–3.5]3.1 [2.8–3.45]3.2 [2.9–3.5]0.368
6-months LVIDd5.0   ±   0.55.0 [4.65–5.3]5.0 [4.5–5.35]0.502
6-months LVEDV104.0   ±   3095.0 [80.0–115.0]101.0 [80.5–124.0]0.251
6-months LVESV52.3 [37.5–60]47.0 [37.0–52.5]50.0 [40.0–67.0]0.023
6-months MADd3.1 [3–3.2]3.1 [3.0–3.2]3.0 [2.9–3.2]0.183
6-months mitral regurgitation
054 (27%)28260.873
0/17 (4%)700.021
166 (33%)36300.452
1/229 (15%)9200.045
225 (13%)13121.000
2/310 (5%)551.000
31 (1%)011.000
3/42 (1%)111.000
6-years follow-up data
All-cause mortality22 (11%)7150.114
Cardiovascular death14 (7%)680.782
Non-cardiovascular death8 (4%)170.071
Hospitalization due to HF5 (3%)321.000
Reinfarction7 (4%)610.124
Stroke4 (2%)310.614
Stent restenosis4 (2%)221.000
Re-PCI of the non-culprit vessel10 (5%)551.000
Number of days until the first MACE17452287.0 [1874.0–2476.0]1854.0 [615.0–2208.5]0.001
Number of days until death20632361.0 [2272.5–2484.0]1942.0 [1601.75–2260.5]0.001
HF, Heart Failure; MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events; NYHA, New York Heart Association; CCS, Canadian Cardiology Society; FSLV, Fractional Shortening of the Left Ventricle; EFLV, Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction; LVIDs, Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in Systole; LVIDd, Left Ventricular Internal Dimension in Diastole; LVEDV, Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume; LVESV, Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume; MADd, Mitral Annulus Diameter Dimension; PCI, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Table 4. Association of QRS complex width and MACE.
Table 4. Association of QRS complex width and MACE.
QRS ComplexMACEWidth [msec]p ValueOR [95% CI]p Value
Pre-PCINo100 [IQR 90–105]0.0261.028 [1.003–1.053]0.029
Yes102.5 [IQR 90–110]
Right after the procedureNo95 [IQR 85–100]0.0101.026 [1.004–1.048]0.020
Yes100 [IQR 90–110]
1-h after the procedureNo94 [IQR 85–100]0.0131.027 [1.003–1.052]0.025
Yes95 [IQR 85–105]
72 h after the procedureNo85 [IQR 80–95]0.0201.031 [1.002–1.060]0.034
Yes89 [IQR 80–100]
1 monthNo85 [IQR 80–90]0.0341.042 [1.012–1.074]0.007
Yes85 [IQR 80–100]
6 monthsNo85 [IQR 80–90]0.0411.038 [1.009–1.069]0.011
Yes87.5 [IQR 80–100]
MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events; PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Table 5. Association of ST-segment elevation and MACE in STEMI patients.
Table 5. Association of ST-segment elevation and MACE in STEMI patients.
ST-SegmentMACEElevation [mm]p ValueOR [95% CI]p Value
Pre-PCINo3 [IQR 2–5]0.0181.61 [1.024–1.317]0.020
Yes3 [IQR 2.5–5]
Right after the procedureNo1 [IQR 0–2.5]0.0011.296 [1.103–1.523]0.002
Yes2 [IQR 0.75–3]
1-h after the procedureNo0 [IQR 0–1]0.0011.391 [1.111–1.741]0.004
Yes0.5 [IQR 0.5–2]
72 h after the procedureNo0 [IQR 0–5]0.0041.500 [1.037–2.170]0.031
Yes0 [IQR 0–0.75]
1 monthNo0 [IQR 0–0]0.0013.256 [1.572–6.747]0.001
Yes0 [IQR 0–0.5]
6 monthsNo0 [IQR 0–0]0.0032.972 [1.268–6.965]0.012
Yes0 [IQR 0–0.25]
MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events; PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Table 6. Multivariate model for QRS width pre-PCI and CPK and Troponin.
Table 6. Multivariate model for QRS width pre-PCI and CPK and Troponin.
MACEOdds RatioStd. Err.zP > z[95% Conf.Interval]
QRS pre-PCI1.0273250.01298652.130.0331.0021851.053096
CPK MB pre-PCI1.0030710.00343830.890.3710.99635421.009832
TNI 01.0129770.09703250.130.8930.83958241.222181
_cons0.02431910.0316703−2.850.0040.00189430.3122134
Table 7. Multivariate model for ST-segment elevation pre-PCI and CPK and Troponin.
Table 7. Multivariate model for ST-segment elevation pre-PCI and CPK and Troponin.
MACEOdds RatioStd. Err.zP > z[95% Conf.Interval]
ST-segment elevation pre-PCI1.1653510.07588572.350.0191.0257181.323993
CPK MB pre-PCI1.0029970.00347250.860.3870.9962141.009826
TNI 01.02250.09894680.230.8180.84584921.236043
_cons0.02431910.0316703−2.850.0040.00189430.3122134
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maletin, S.; Petrović, M.; Stojšić-Milosavljević, A.; Miljković, T.; Milovančev, A.; Petrović, I.; Milosavljević, I.; Balenović, A.; Čanković, M. The Role of QRS Complex and ST-Segment in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients with ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101042

AMA Style

Maletin S, Petrović M, Stojšić-Milosavljević A, Miljković T, Milovančev A, Petrović I, Milosavljević I, Balenović A, Čanković M. The Role of QRS Complex and ST-Segment in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients with ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(10):1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maletin, Srđan, Milovan Petrović, Anastazija Stojšić-Milosavljević, Tatjana Miljković, Aleksandra Milovančev, Ivan Petrović, Isidora Milosavljević, Ana Balenović, and Milenko Čanković. 2024. "The Role of QRS Complex and ST-Segment in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients with ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study" Diagnostics 14, no. 10: 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101042

APA Style

Maletin, S., Petrović, M., Stojšić-Milosavljević, A., Miljković, T., Milovančev, A., Petrović, I., Milosavljević, I., Balenović, A., & Čanković, M. (2024). The Role of QRS Complex and ST-Segment in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients with ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study. Diagnostics, 14(10), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop