Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 and Serum Apolipoprotein A2-Isoforms in the Diagnosis of Stage 0 and IA Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

by
Morten Jongshøj Lorentzen
1,2,*,
Anne Heltborg Kristensen
1,2,
Frida Poppius Kaldan
1,
Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares
1,2,
Mathias Amdi Hertz
3,4,
Jens Juel Specht
1,
Stefan Posth
4,5,
Mats Jacob Hermansson Lindberg
1,
Søren Helbo Skaarup
6,
Meinhard Reinert Hansen
7,
Camilla Stræde Spile
7,
Michael Brun Andersen
8,9,
Ole Graumann
10,11,
Christian Backer Mogensen
1,2,
Helene Skjøt-Arkil
1,2 and
Christian B. Laursen
12,13
1
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark
2
Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
3
Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
4
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
5
Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
6
Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
7
Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
8
Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
9
Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, 2200 København, Denmark
10
Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
11
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
12
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
13
Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(17), 1921; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171921 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 July 2024 / Revised: 7 August 2024 / Accepted: 29 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Application of Point of Care Ultrasound)

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of handheld ultrasound (HHUS) devices operated by newly certified operators for pneumonia is unknown. This multicenter diagnostic accuracy study included patients prospectively suspected of pneumonia from February 2021 to February 2022 in four emergency departments. The index test was a 14-zone focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) examination, with consolidation with air bronchograms as diagnostic criteria for pneumonia. FLUS examinations were performed by newly certified operators using HHUS. The reference standard was computed tomography (CT) and expert diagnosis using all medical records. The sensitivity and specificity of FLUS and chest X-ray (CXR) were compared using McNemar’s test. Of the 324 scanned patients, 212 (65%) had pneumonia, according to the expert diagnosis. FLUS had a sensitivity of 31% (95%CI 26–36) and a specificity of 82% (95%CI 78–86) compared with the experts’ diagnosis. Compared with CT, FLUS had a sensitivity of 32% (95%CI 27–37) and specificity of 81% (95%CI 77–85). CXR had a sensitivity of 66% (95%CI 61–72) and a specificity of 76% (95%CI 71–81) compared with the experts’ diagnosis. Compared with CT, CXR had a sensitivity of 69% (95%CI 63–74) and a specificity of 68% (95%CI 62–72). Compared with the experts’ diagnosis and CT diagnosis, FLUS performed by newly certified operators using HHUS devices had a significantly lower sensitivity for pneumonia when compared to CXR (p < 0.001). FLUS had a significantly higher specificity than CXR using CT diagnosis as a reference standard (p = 0.02). HHUS exhibited low sensitivity for pneumonia when used by newly certified operators.
Keywords: diagnostic accuracy; emergency department; handheld ultrasound; lung ultrasound; novice; pneumonia diagnostic accuracy; emergency department; handheld ultrasound; lung ultrasound; novice; pneumonia

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lorentzen, M.J.; Kristensen, A.H.; Kaldan, F.P.; Cartuliares, M.B.; Hertz, M.A.; Specht, J.J.; Posth, S.; Lindberg, M.J.H.; Skaarup, S.H.; Hansen, M.R.; et al. Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171921

AMA Style

Lorentzen MJ, Kristensen AH, Kaldan FP, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Specht JJ, Posth S, Lindberg MJH, Skaarup SH, Hansen MR, et al. Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(17):1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lorentzen, Morten Jongshøj, Anne Heltborg Kristensen, Frida Poppius Kaldan, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares, Mathias Amdi Hertz, Jens Juel Specht, Stefan Posth, Mats Jacob Hermansson Lindberg, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Meinhard Reinert Hansen, and et al. 2024. "Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study" Diagnostics 14, no. 17: 1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171921

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop