Next Article in Journal
Pre-Reconstruction Processing with the Cycle-Consist Generative Adversarial Network Combined with Attention Gate to Improve Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy Outcomes with Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Body Height of MPS I and II Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Impact of Dermatan Sulphate

by
Patryk Lipiński
1,*,†,
Agnieszka Różdżyńska-Świątkowska
2,†,
Agnieszka Ługowska
3,
Jolanta Marucha
4,
Katarzyna Drabko
5 and
Anna Tylki-Szymańska
4,*
1
Institute of Clinical Sciences, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Medical Academy, 03-411 Warsaw, Poland
2
Anthropology Laboratory, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland
3
Department of Genetics, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Al. Sobieskiego 9, 02-957 Warsaw, Poland
4
Department of Pediatrics, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland
5
Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(17), 1956; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171956
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 1 September 2024 / Accepted: 3 September 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Bone Diseases: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Introduction: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) comprises one of the two main treatment regimens for patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS). There is a scarcity of literature concerning the process of growth in children with Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) and Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS II) after HSCT. The aim of this manuscript was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of HSCT on the heights of patients with MPS I and MPS II. Material and methods: It was an observational, single-center study on patients with MPS I and II treated with HSCT. Results: 6 MPS patients, including 4 MPS I and 2 MPS II, underwent HSCT at a median age of 2 years. All patients are alive to date, with a median age of 7.7 years (range 5.5–12 years) at the last follow-up. In both (MPS I and MPS II) groups of patients treated with HSCT, the growth rate was higher than in untreated patients and was found to be in line with the population norm. In both MPS I and MPS II patients who were treated with HSCT, normalization of urinary GAG excretion was observed. Additionally, no bands of DS and HS in GAG electrophoresis were visible. Conclusions: Both MPS I and MPS II patients presented height gain after HSCT compared to the curves of untreated patients. The absence of dermatan sulphate after HSCT could lead to normal growth in bone length.

1. Introduction

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of inherited metabolic diseases related to deficiencies of lysosomal enzymes responsible for glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) catabolism [1,2]. GAGs consist of five types of disaccharides: heparan sulphate (HS), dermatan sulfate (DS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), keratan sulfate (KS), and hyaluronan [3]. Depending on the impaired enzyme type, the accumulated GAGs differ, leading to specific abnormalities [2,3]. DS is primarily found in the skin, cartilage, bones, cornea, cardiac valves, and other connective tissues. Its accumulation has a direct detrimental effect on the cartilage, in which damage to the growth plates undoubtedly harm the growth and volume of bone [3,4]. Abnormal HS levels in the central nervous system (CNS) have been found to be responsible for dysregulation of neuronal differentiation, growth, and neurotransmission [5].
Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease (LSD) associated with deficient activity of α-L-iduronidase (IDUA; EC 3.2.1.76) [6]. According to its clinical severity and neurodevelopmental outcome, three forms of MPS I are distinguished, namely, Hurler (MPS I-H; # 607014), Hurler–Scheie (MPS I-HS; # 607015), and Scheie syndromes (MPS I-S; # 607016) [6]. Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome; # 309900) is an X-linked LSD caused by a deficiency of iduronate 2-sulfatase (I2S, EC 3.1.6.13) [7]. Patients with MPS II are currently categorized as having either an attenuated (no central nervous system (CNS) impairment) or severe (CNS impairment) phenotype, with the latter being the more prevalent. DS and HS are found as primary storage materials in both MPS I and MPS II (neuronopathic forms).
Two main treatment regimens for MPS patients are available in practice: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). MPS I was the first to be treated with ERT (Aldurazyme), which has been available since 2003 [6,8]. In 2006, ERT with recombinant human I2S (Elaprase) was approved for the treatment of MPS II [7,9]. ERT does not cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and this fact especially concerns patients with severe (neuronopathic) forms of MPS. The first bone marrow transplantation in MPS was performed in a 1-year-old boy with MPS IH in 1981 [10]. HSCT is now reserved for patients below the age of 2 years (before severe cognitive impairment) with the most severe type of MPS and constitutes the gold standard treatment for MPS IH [11]. Its efficacy depends on the patient’s age and disease stage at the time of the procedure, the type of MPS, the type of donor, and the preparative regimen. While survival rates and short-term clinical outcomes are known to be improved by HSCT, there is a scarcity of literature concerning the process of growth in children with both MPS I and MPS II after HSCT.
The aim of this manuscript was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of HSCT on the height of patients with MPS I and MPS II. A comparison with untreated patients was also provided.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Anthropometric Measurements

Anthropometric measurements were taken according to a standard technique and included body length/height. Until the age of 3 years, the body lengths of the children were measured in supine position using a liberometer (accuracy to 1 mm). The same measurements in older children were performed for standing height using a stadiometer (accuracy to 1 mm).
The study group patients did not present with skeletal deformities that would affect measurements. Also, the comparable measurements in a lying position along the curves of the body with a centimeter confirmed the above-mentioned information.

2.2. GAG Electrophoresis

GAGs were isolated from urine sediment by precipitation with Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and electrophoresed on the acetyl acetate according to the method of Hopwood [12].

3. Patient Characteristics

3.1. Overall Characteristics

The median age at MPS diagnosis was 14 months (range 13–16 months). In all patients, diagnosis was confirmed by increased urinary GAGs and electrophoresis, as well as deficiency of an adequate enzyme (IDUA or I2S activity) in leukocytes/dried blood spots. Mutation analysis revealed all patients with MPS I (Pt 1–4) to be homozygous for p.Q70X variant. Patients 5 and 6 were found to be hemizygous for a pathogenic deletion encompassing exon 8 and exons 1 to 8 of the IDS gene, respectively.
Six MPS patients, including four MPS I and two MPS II, underwent HSCT at a median age of 2 years (range 18 months–2 years and 6 months). All HSCT grafts were bone marrow transplants (BMT). Within the first year post-HSCT, full donor chimerism (100%) was achieved in all but one patient (Pt 2 with MPS I). In Patient 2, the chimerism decreased below 50% from 6 months years post HSCT. He suffered from severe hemolytic anemia (diagnosed 6 months after HSCT) and was treated with corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and rituximab (4 doses). Finally, he underwent 2nd HSCT one year after.
All patients are alive to date, with a median age of 7.7 years (range 5.5–12 years) at the last follow-up. The median follow-up time post-HSCT was 5.5 years (range 2.5–9.5 years).

3.2. Clinical Outcome

Thoracolumbar spine kyphosis (MPS I) as well as hip dysplasia (MPS I and II) were observed in all patients at the time of diagnosis. There was a tendency to progression of both spine kyphosis and hip dysplasia observed, despite HSCT. However, only one patient (Pt 6) required surgical intervention (due to hip luxation). At diagnosis, the biggest restriction in passive range of movement (ROM) in shoulder abduction and flexion was observed. After HSCT, there was stabilization or slight improvement.
No patient had hydrocephalus. Narrowing of the spinal canal was observed in one patient (Pt 1) starting at the age of 5.5 years.
No patient presented with carpal tunnel syndrome before HSCT. Two patients (Pt 2 and 4) developed carpal tunnel syndrome, at 5 and 12 years, respectively.
Corneal clouding was observed in all patients at the time of diagnosis of MPS I. Despite HSCT, corneal clouding worsened in all patients.
All patients but one (Pt 1) underwent adenectomy with tympanostomy tube fitting before HSCT. The latter was qualified for these procedures after HSCT at 5.5 years of age.
Bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment was observed in four patients and was assessed as mild or moderate (40–55 dB) at the time of diagnosis. Long-term hearing appeared to improve in two patients (unilateral mild hearing loss) and to stabilize in two other patients after HSCT.
Mitral valve thickening was observed in all patients before HSCT and remained stable after HSCT.
All the patients presented with normal intellectual development after HSCT.
Detailed clinical characteristics of the study patients are provided in Table 1.

3.3. Anthropometric Phenotype

Patients with MPS I and MPS II after HSCT had normal body proportions, including the length of the trunk and lower limbs, and normal head circumferences, like healthy children. Narrow shoulders and chests, as in untreated MPS patients, were also observed in MPS I after HSCT.
In both (MPS I and MPS II) groups of patients treated with HSCT, the growth rates were higher than in untreated patients and were found to be in line with the population norm, see Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Individual patients’ growth charts were provided in Supplementary Figure S1. All the patients presented with height gain after HSCT.

3.4. Urinary GAG Electrophoresis

In both MPS I and MPS II patients who were treated with HSCT, normalization of urinary GAG excretion was observed when comparing the results of the semi-quantitative test with CPC (Table 1). Additionally, in both (MPS I and MPS II) groups of patients after HSCT, no bands of DS or HS in GAG electrophoresis were visible (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Contrarily, in urine from MPS I and MPS II patients treated with ERT, traces of DS and/or HS in GAG electrophoresis were still observed (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

4. Discussion

This study provides some novel insights regarding the positive impact of HSCT on bone growth of pediatric patients with both MPS I and MPS II after HSCT. We demonstrated that HSCT in patients with MPS I and MPS II resulted in the normalization of urinary GAG excretion and the absence of both dermatan and heparan sulfate (DS, HS) in GAG electrophoresis. We confirmed that hip dysplasia, kyphosis, and corneal clouding could worsen, aside from HSCT.
First, we would like to highlight the importance of biochemical diagnosis of MPS. The identification of the stored substrate (GAGs) is crucial, and typically includes quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative analysis (using electrophoresis or thin-layer chromatography) of GAGs excreted in urine. In our country, GAG electrophoresis is performed, allowing for the separation of GAGs with good sensitivity and reproducibility. In all our study patients (both MPS I and MPS II after HSCT), a biochemical improvement, defined as the normalization of urinary GAG excretion and the absence of both dermatan and heparan sulfate (DS, HS) in GAG electrophoresis, was observed. A dramatic decrease in DS in GAG electrophoresis in an MPS I patient was noted for the first time by Hobbs et al. several dozen years ago [10].
In our previous studies, we evaluated and described growth in untreated patients with MPS I, II, IVA, and VI [13,14,15]. We also published the results of an analysis of longitudinal anthropometric data of MPS II patients (n = 13) who started ERT before 6 years of age (range from 3 months to 6 years, mean 3.6 years, median 4 years) compared with a retrospective analysis of data for MPS II patients naïve to ERT (n = 50). The course of the average growth curve for MPS II patients treated with ERT was found to be very similar to the growth pattern in untreated patients—there was no statistically significant difference in the mean increase in body height between these two groups [16]. However, our results were not consistent with the study of Jones et al. [17] in the group of patients enrolled in HOS, the Hunter Outcome Survey. This study showed that the slope after treatment was significantly improved compared with before treatment [17]. Similarly to our observations in the group of MPS II patients treated with ERT, we did not observe a positive effect of recombinant human alpha-L-iduronidase (laronidase) on the growth of patients with MPS I [14]. Anthropometric features of 14 patients with MPS I were followed from birth until the introduction of ERT (group 1—in the 1st year of life, group 2—in the 3rd year of life), after 52–260 weeks of ERT, and periodically during treatment. After 96–260 weeks of ERT, patients receiving laronidase (group 1) did not show statistically significant improvement compared with group 2 [14].
In this study, MPS I and MPS II growth curves of patients after HSCT are compared to curves of untreated patients. Both MPS I and MPS II patients presented with height gain after HSCT compared to curves of untreated patients. This observation could be explained by the phenomenon of catch-up growth—that is, after removing the factor that limits the growth, the body tends to grow faster, making up for the deficiencies and equalizing its own reaction norm.
Up to now, only in the study of Cattoni et al. has a systematic comparison with the reference auxological data of untreated Hurler patients been demonstrated [18]. The authors observed that HSCT positively affected growth and provided transplanted patients with remarkable height gain. In all the remaining reports of MPS I, a comparison with the healthy population was performed. Long term, there was progressive deviation from the reference curves, with a large proportion of patients presenting with a final height below −2 SDS [19].
Regarding MPS II, Patel et al. assessed the impact of ERT and HSCT on growth in a group of 44 Japanese male patients with MPS II (26 patients had been treated with ERT, 12 patients had been treated with HSCT, and 6 had been treated with both ERT and HSCT) [20]. They found that MPS II patients who had been treated with either ERT or HSCT had increased height compared to untreated patients. Additionally, no significant difference in growth impact between patients treated with either ERT or HSCT from 4 to 12 years of age was observed. These observations are in line with the results of our study. All MPS II patients were treated with HSCT early in life (<2 years of age), and a height gain after HSCT was observed.
Bone disease (along with CNS impairment) constitutes the greatest therapeutic challenge in MPS due to limited penetration of ERT into poorly vascularized tissues (e.g., cartilage) and to the irreversibility of some lesions at the time of ERT/HSCT. Also, the therapeutic effect of HSCT in bone pathology is not very well understood. Santi et al. recently demonstrated in a mouse model of MPS I that BMT significantly reduced the widening of the long bones, but there was also complete normalization of long bone thickness [21]. Pievani et al. provided more detailed characteristics of bone markers, including trabecular number and separation, cortical thickness, and bone mineral volume [22]. This revealed significant differences between untreated and nBMT MPS I mice. All MPS I mice treated with BMT displayed above-mentioned bone parameter values comparable to those of wild-type mice, confirming significant improvements in the skeletal phenotype approaching complete normalization of each parameter tested.
The pathogenesis of growth impairment in patients with MPS can mostly be regarded as the effect of the pathological storage of dermatan sulfate (DS) in cartilage, bones, and growth plates. Simonaro et al. suggested that the main affected tissue is the cartilage rather than the bone itself. It has been also demonstrated that the accumulation of GAG exerts a detrimental effect on bone deposition by inducing dysfunctional osteoblastic activity [23]. Hinek and Wilson reported that elastogenesis takes place in the shaft of long bones during fetal life, and accumulation of DS by fibroblasts induces functional deficiency in the elastin-binding protein and, consequently, leads to disruption of normal elastogenesis [24]. DS damage to tropoelastin could be relevant to skeletal pathology in patients with MPS disease.
Based on our anthropologic (height gain after HSCT) and biochemical (absence of DS in GAG electrophoresis) results and the pathogenesis of growth impairment (chondrocytes damage) in MPS, we can assume that the absence of DS after HSCT could lead to normal bone length growth (depending on chondrocytes). On the other hand, HSCT has no impact on the growth of flat bones, which involves osteoblasts arising from mesenchymal tissue damaged in fetal life.
A limitation of our study is the small group of patients; however, the presented results shed light on the mechanism of compromised growth in patients with MPS, as well as the positive effect of HSCT. Further studies in a mouse model of MPS, including histological analysis of bone growth plates and studies on growth-related gene expression, are needed to evaluate our observations and provide stronger evidence (i.e., normal chondrocyte morphology and function and over-expression of genes related with bone growth in length).

5. Conclusions

Both MPS I and MPS II patients presented with height gain after HSCT compared to the curves of untreated patients.
The absence of dermatan sulphate after HSCT could provide normal bone length growth.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics14171956/s1, Supplementary Figure S1: Individual patient’s growth charts (green arrow—time of HSCT).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and A.T.-S.; methodology, A.R.-Ś. and A.Ł.; investigation, P.L., A.R.-Ś. and J.M.; data curation, P.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.L.; writing—review and editing, A.R.-Ś., A.Ł., J.M., K.D. and A.T.-S.; supervision, A.T.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the local Ethical Committee of The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland (number 51/KB/2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent including consent for publication was obtained from patients’ parents or guardians.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wiśniewska, K.; Wolski, J.; Gaffke, L.; Cyske, Z.; Pierzynowska, K.; Węgrzyn, G. Misdiagnosis in mucopolysaccharidoses. J. Appl. Genet. 2022, 63, 475–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fecarotta, S.; Tarallo, A.; Damiano, C.; Minopoli, N.; Parenti, G. Pathogenesis of Mucopolysaccharidoses, an Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ago, Y.; Rintz, E.; Musini, K.S.; Ma, Z.; Tomatsu, S. Molecular Mechanisms in Pathophysiology of Mucopolysaccharidosis and Prospects for Innovative Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kubaski, F.; De Poswar, F.D.; Michelin-Tirelli, K.; Burin, M.G.; Rojas-Málaga, D.; Brusius-Facchin, A.C.; Leistner-Segal, S.; Giugliani, R. Diagnosis of Mucopolysaccharidoses. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bigger, B.W.; Begley, D.J.; Virgintino, D.; Pshezhetsky, A.V. Anatomical changes and pathophysiology of the brain in mucopolysaccharidosis disorders. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018, 125, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kubaski, F.; De Poswar, F.D.; Michelin-Tirelli, K.; Da Matte, U.D.; Horovitz, D.D.; Barth, A.L.; Baldo, G.; Vairo, F.; Giugliani, R. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. D’avanzo, F.; Rigon, L.; Zanetti, A.; Tomanin, R. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: One Hundred Years of Research, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Muenzer, J.; Wraith, J.E.; Clarke, L.A. International Consensus Panel on Management and Treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis I. Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Management and treatment guidelines. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beck, M. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II (Hunter Syndrome): Clinical picture and treatment. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2011, 12, 861–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hobbs, J.R.; Hugh-Jones, K.; Barrett, A.J.; Byrom, N.; Chambers, D.; Henry, K.; James, D.C.; Lucas, C.F.; Rogers, T.R.; Benson, P.F.; et al. Reversal of clinical features of Hurler’s disease and biochemical improvement after treatment by bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet 1981, 318, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Taylor, M.; Khan, S.; Stapleton, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Wynn, R.; Yabe, H.; Chinen, Y.; Boelens, J.J.; Mason, R.W.; et al. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mucopolysaccharidoses: Past, Present, and Future. Transplant. Cell. Ther. 2019, 25, e226–e246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hopwood, J.J.; Harrison, J.R. High-resolution electrophoresis of urinary glycosamino glycans: An improved screening test for the mucopolysaccharidoses. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 119, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Różdżyńska-Świątkowska, A.; Jurecka, A.; Cieślik, J.; Tylki-Szymańska, A. Growth patterns in children with mucopolysaccharidosis I and II. World J. Pediatr. 2014, 11, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tylki-Szymanska, A.; Rozdzynska, A.; Jurecka, A.; Marucha, J.; Czartoryska, B. Anthropometric data of 14 patients with mucopolysaccharidosis I: Retrospective analysis and efficacy of recombinant human α-l-iduronidase (laronidase). Mol. Genet. Metab. 2009, 99, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Różdżyńska-Świątkowska, A.; Zielińska, A.; Tylki-Szymańska, A. Comparison of growth dynamics in different types of MPS: An attempt to explain the causes. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2022, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Żuber, Z.; Różdżyńska-Świątkowska, A.; Jurecka, A.; Tylki-Szymańska, A. The effect of recombinant human iduronate-2-sulfatase (Idursulfase) on growth in young patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jones, S.A.; Parini, R.; Harmatz, P.; Giugliani, R.; Fang, J.; Mendelsohn, N.J. The effect of idursulfase on growth in patients with Hunter syndrome: Data from the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS). Mol. Genet. Metab. 2013, 109, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cattoni, A.; Chiaraluce, S.; Gasperini, S.; Molinari, S.; Biondi, A.; Rovelli, A.; Parini, R. Growth patterns in children with mucopolysaccharidosis type I-Hurler after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Comparison with untreated patients. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2021, 28, 100787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guffon, N.; Pettazzoni, M.; Pangaud, N.; Garin, C.; Lina-Granade, G.; Plault, C.; Mottolese, C.; Froissart, R.; Fouilhoux, A. Long term disease burden post-transplantation: Three decades of observations in 25 Hurler patients successfully treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2021, 16, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Patel, P.; Suzuki, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Yabe, H.; Kato, S.; Shimada, T.; Mason, R.W.; Orii, K.E.; Fukao, T.; Orii, T.; et al. Impact of Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy on Growth in Patients with Hunter Syndrome. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2014, 1, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santi, L.; De Ponti, G.; Dina, G.; Pievani, A.; Corsi, A.; Riminucci, M.; Khan, S.; Sawamoto, K.; Antolini, L.; Gregori, S.; et al. Neonatal combination therapy improves some of the clinical manifestations in the Mucopolysaccharidosis type I murine model. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2020, 130, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pievani, A.; Azario, I.M.R.; Antolini, L.; Shimada, T.; Patel, P.; Remoli, C.; Rambaldi, B.; Valsecchi, M.G.; Riminucci, M.; Biondi, A.; et al. Neonatal bone marrow transplantation prevents bone pathology in a mouse model of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Blood 2015, 125, 1662–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Simonaro, C.M.; D’Angelo, M.; Haskins, M.E.; Schuchman, E.H. Joint and bone disease in mucopolysaccharidoses VI and VII: Identification of new therapeutic targets and biomarkers using animal models. Pediatr. Res. 2005, 57, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hinek, A.; Wilson, S.E. Impaired elastogenesis in Hurler disease—Dermatan sulfate accumulation linked to deficiency in elastin-binding protein and elastic fiber assembly. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 925–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Body height of MPS I patients after HSCT (red lines; arrow—time of HSCT) with comparison with untreated patients (blue line).
Figure 1. Body height of MPS I patients after HSCT (red lines; arrow—time of HSCT) with comparison with untreated patients (blue line).
Diagnostics 14 01956 g001
Figure 2. Body height of MPS II patients after HSCT (red lines; arrow—time of HSCT) with comparison with untreated patients (blue line).
Figure 2. Body height of MPS II patients after HSCT (red lines; arrow—time of HSCT) with comparison with untreated patients (blue line).
Diagnostics 14 01956 g002
Figure 3. Changes in GAG electrophoresis in MPS I patients after HSCT and ERT. Abbreviations: SCh—chondroitin sulphate; SD—dermatan sulphate; SH—heparan sulphate; GAG—glycosaminoglycan; ERT—enzyme replacement therapy; HSCT—hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. (A) 1—before treatment; 2—after 2 years of HSCT; 3—after 4 years of HSCT. (B) 1—before treatment; 2—after 2 years of HSCT; 3—after 3 years of HSCT. (C) 1—before treatment; 2—control sample; 3—after 11 years of ERT; 4—after 21 years of ERT. (D) 1—control sample; 2—before treatment; 3—after 11 years of ERT; 4—after 21 years of ERT.
Figure 3. Changes in GAG electrophoresis in MPS I patients after HSCT and ERT. Abbreviations: SCh—chondroitin sulphate; SD—dermatan sulphate; SH—heparan sulphate; GAG—glycosaminoglycan; ERT—enzyme replacement therapy; HSCT—hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. (A) 1—before treatment; 2—after 2 years of HSCT; 3—after 4 years of HSCT. (B) 1—before treatment; 2—after 2 years of HSCT; 3—after 3 years of HSCT. (C) 1—before treatment; 2—control sample; 3—after 11 years of ERT; 4—after 21 years of ERT. (D) 1—control sample; 2—before treatment; 3—after 11 years of ERT; 4—after 21 years of ERT.
Diagnostics 14 01956 g003
Figure 4. Changes in GAG electrophoresis in MPS II patients after HSCT and ERT. Abbreviations: SCh—chondroitin sulphate; SD—dermatan sulphate; SH—heparan sulphate; GAG—glycosaminoglycan; ERT—enzyme replacement therapy; HSCT—hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. (A) 1—before treatment; 2—after 9 months of HSCT. (B) 1—before treatment; 2—after 3 years of HSCT; 3—after 3 years and 4 months of HSCT. (C) 1—before treatment; 2—after 7.5 years of ERT; 3—after. 2.5 years of ERT; 4—after 16 years of ERT; 5—after 21 years of ERT. (D) 1—before treatment; 2—after 1.5 years of ERT; 3—after 3 years of ERT; 4—after 4.5 years of ERT. (E) 1—before treatment; 2—after 6 years of HSCT; 3—after 10 years of HSCT. (F) 1—MPS II without treatment.
Figure 4. Changes in GAG electrophoresis in MPS II patients after HSCT and ERT. Abbreviations: SCh—chondroitin sulphate; SD—dermatan sulphate; SH—heparan sulphate; GAG—glycosaminoglycan; ERT—enzyme replacement therapy; HSCT—hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. (A) 1—before treatment; 2—after 9 months of HSCT. (B) 1—before treatment; 2—after 3 years of HSCT; 3—after 3 years and 4 months of HSCT. (C) 1—before treatment; 2—after 7.5 years of ERT; 3—after. 2.5 years of ERT; 4—after 16 years of ERT; 5—after 21 years of ERT. (D) 1—before treatment; 2—after 1.5 years of ERT; 3—after 3 years of ERT; 4—after 4.5 years of ERT. (E) 1—before treatment; 2—after 6 years of HSCT; 3—after 10 years of HSCT. (F) 1—MPS II without treatment.
Diagnostics 14 01956 g004
Table 1. Clinical, biochemical, and molecular data of the study patients (Abbreviations: DBS—dried blood spot; GAGs—glycosaminoglycans; DS—dermatan sulphate; HS—heparan sulphate; y—year; m—month; pc—percentile).
Table 1. Clinical, biochemical, and molecular data of the study patients (Abbreviations: DBS—dried blood spot; GAGs—glycosaminoglycans; DS—dermatan sulphate; HS—heparan sulphate; y—year; m—month; pc—percentile).
Patient No.
Type of MPS
Genotype
AgeAnthropometric AnalysesAlpha-Iduronidase (MPS I) or Iduronate 2-Sulfatase (MPS II) Activity in DBSAlpha-Iduronidase (MPS I) or Iduronate 2-Sulfatase (MPS II) Activity in LeukocytesGAGs in Urine—Quantitative Analysis with DMB GAGs in Urine—Semi-Quantitative Analysis with Cetylpyridinium Chloride GAGs ElectrophoresisClinical Outcome
1
MPS I
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)/
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)
13 mWeight 10.9 kg (50 pc)
Height 79.5 cm (50 pc)
<1.1 (limit of quantification) µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)10 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)158.7 (4.21–18.7) mg/mmol creatinine)699 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineDS and subtle HSinguinal hernia, subtle corneal clouding, thickened mitral valve, mild liver enlargement, limited range of motion in the glenohumeral joints
5.5 y (3 y after HSCT)Weight 21.2 kg (50 pc)
Height 113.8 cm (35 pc)
1.7 µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)180 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)17.6 (4.21–18.7 mg/mmol creatinine)55 (113 ± 46) mg/g creatinineNormal resultsstable thickening of mitral valve, corneal opacity over the entire surface, qualification for adenotomy, normal cognitive development, stable limitation of the range of motion in the glenohumeral joints, narrowing of the spinal canal (5.5 y)
2
MPS I
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)/
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)
14 mWeight 11.6 kg (50–75 pc)
Height 80.5 cm (50–75 pc)
<1.1 (limit of quantification) µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)9.72 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)137 (4.21–18.7) mg/mmol creatinine)648 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineDS and subtle HSbilateral hearing loss, thickened mitral valve, mild liver enlargement, limited range of motion in the glenohumeral joints
5.5 yWeight 20.3 kg (19 pc)
Height 109.2 cm (12 pc)
5.9 µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)178 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)16.4 (4.21–18.7 mg/mmol creatinine)55 (113 ± 46) mg/g creatinineTraces of DS and HSmild hearing loss, carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed at 5 y, normal cognitive development, stable limitation of the range of motion in the glenohumeral joints, carpal tunnel syndromne (5 y)
3
MPS I
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)/
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)
13 mWeight 10.3 kg (10–25 pc)
Height 80.6 cm (75–90 pc)
<1.1 (limit of quantification) µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)0.01 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)253 (4.21–18.7) mg/mmol creatinine)1603 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineDS Thickened mitral valve, bilateral hearing loss, corneal clouding, mild liver enlargement, limited range of motion in the glenohumeral joints
12 yWeight 40.2 kg (77 pc)
Height 137.2 cm (34 pc)
3.9 µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)87 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)15.3 (4.21–18.7 mg/mmol creatinine)66 (115 ± 61) mg/g creatinineNormal resultsno carpal tunnel syndrome, progressive thoracic kyphosis, bilateral hip dysplasia, normal intellectual development, stable thickening of mitral valve
4
MPS I
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)/
c.208C > T, p.(Gln70*)
12 y
(age at diagnosis: 16 months)
Weight 49.7 kg (78 pc)
Height 144.3 cm (10 pc)
4.1 µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)132 nmol/mg protein/18 h (129 ± 40.5)9.6 (4.21–18.7 mg/mmol creatinine)134 (115 ± 61) mg/g creatinineNormal resultsBilateral hip dysplasia, progressive lumbar lordosis, mild hearing loss, corneal opacity over the entire surface, carpal tunnel syndrome (12 y), normal intellectual development
5
MPS II
c.1134_1152dup, p.(Asp385ProfsX7)
14 mWeight 15.3 kg (90–97 pc)
Height 86.5 cm (>97 pc)
<0.8 (limit of detection) µmol/L/h (ref. > 5.6 µmol/L/h)2.8 nmol/mg protein/4 h (354 ± 85.9)111.7 (9.52–26.9 mg/mmol creatinine)944 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineDS, HSlimited range of motion in the glenohumeral joints, qualified for adenectomy, mild liver enlargement, thickened mitral valve
5 y (3 y after HSCT)Weight 20.1 kg (62 pc)
Height 116.2 cm (91 pc)
3.1 µmol/L/h (ref. > 5.6 µmol/L/h)28.8 nmol/mg protein/4 h (354 ± 85.9)13.2 (9.52–26.9 mg/mmol creatinine)207 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineNormal resultsnormal intellectual development, stable limitation of the range of motion in the glenohumeral joints, stable thickening of the mitral valve
6
MPS II
IDS, loss of exons 01 to 08
14 mWeight 15.3 kg (90–97 pc)
Height 86.5 cm (>97 pc)
<2.8 (limit of quantification) µmol/L/h (ref. > 5.6 µmol/L/h)2.8 nmol/mg protein/4 h (354 ± 85.9)103.7 (9.52–26.9 mg/mmol creatinine)957 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineDS, HSmoderate hearing loss, qualified for adenectomy, unilateral hip dysplasia, limited range of motion in the glenohumeral and hip joints, mild liver enlargement, thickened mitral valve
3 y 2 m (1 y and 3 m after HSCT)Weight 22.3 kg (>97 pc)
Height 102.8 cm (92 pc)
4.2 µmol/L/h (ref. > 3.0 µmol/L/h)35.9 nmol/mg protein/4 h (354 ± 85.9)13.2 (9.52–26.9 mg/mmol creatinine)226 (151 ± 77) mg/g creatinineNormal resultsmoderate hearing loss, hearing aids, stable limitation of the range of motion in the glenohumeral and hip joints, stable thickening of mitral valve
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lipiński, P.; Różdżyńska-Świątkowska, A.; Ługowska, A.; Marucha, J.; Drabko, K.; Tylki-Szymańska, A. Body Height of MPS I and II Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Impact of Dermatan Sulphate. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171956

AMA Style

Lipiński P, Różdżyńska-Świątkowska A, Ługowska A, Marucha J, Drabko K, Tylki-Szymańska A. Body Height of MPS I and II Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Impact of Dermatan Sulphate. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(17):1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lipiński, Patryk, Agnieszka Różdżyńska-Świątkowska, Agnieszka Ługowska, Jolanta Marucha, Katarzyna Drabko, and Anna Tylki-Szymańska. 2024. "Body Height of MPS I and II Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Impact of Dermatan Sulphate" Diagnostics 14, no. 17: 1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop