Next Article in Journal
Ductus Venosus Agenesis in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Growth Restriction: When to Deliver?
Previous Article in Journal
An Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool for Enhancing Pectoral Muscle Segmentation in Mammograms: Addressing Class Imbalance and Validation Challenges in Automated Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Trabecular Bone Microstructure Surrounding Impacted Maxillary Canines Using Fractal Analysis on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population

by
Guna Shekhar Madiraju
1,*,† and
Yousef Majed Almugla
2,†
1
Faculty in Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
2
Faculty in Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2145; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192145
Submission received: 26 August 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024

Abstract

This study estimated the predictive accuracy of the mandibular growth potential based on cervical vertebral bone age using digital lateral cephalograms in a sample of the Saudi population. Methods: This study included digital lateral cephalograms of eighty subjects aged 10–21 years divided into adult and young groups. Cervical vertebral age was calculated by tracing and measuring the third and fourth cervical vertebrae on lateral cephalograms, and the mandibular growth potential was estimated using the Mito et al. regression equation. The accuracy of the calculated CVB age was verified via comparison with the chronological age. The data analyses included independent sample t-tests for testing the differences in mean values and Pearson correlation coefficients to examine the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Results: A significant difference was noted between the mean cervical vertebral age and chronological age in the young group for both males (p = 0.0003) and females (p = 0.033). The correlation coefficient between cervical vertebral age and chronological age in the young male group was higher (r = 0.934) than that in the young females (r = 0.254). Conclusions: The mandibular growth potential prediction based on CVB age using the regression equation of Mito et al. was applicable only to the young Saudi males. Further studies are needed to develop new multiple regression models to obtain cervical vertebral age more accurately for both genders in the Saudi population.
Keywords: growth potential; mandible; cervical vertebral age; chronological age; cephalograms growth potential; mandible; cervical vertebral age; chronological age; cephalograms

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Madiraju, G.S.; Almugla, Y.M. Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2145. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192145

AMA Style

Madiraju GS, Almugla YM. Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(19):2145. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192145

Chicago/Turabian Style

Madiraju, Guna Shekhar, and Yousef Majed Almugla. 2024. "Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population" Diagnostics 14, no. 19: 2145. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192145

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop