Next Article in Journal
Chondrosarcoma of the Pelvis and Extremities: A Review of 77 Cases of a Tertiary Sarcoma Center with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Pancreatic Metastases of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Traction MRI of the Elbow: Age-Based Effects and Implications

1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kikkoman General Hospital, Noda 278-005, Chiba, Japan
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan
3
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
4
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami 300-0395, Ibaraki, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2165; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192165 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 21 August 2024 / Revised: 24 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 28 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We previously reported that traction magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the elbow without arthrography increases the width of the radiocapitellar joint (RC) and improves articular cartilage visibility. However, the effects of axial traction on different age groups have not yet been evaluated. We hypothesized that the effect of traction would decrease as the participants’ age increased. Methods: We enrolled 30 healthy volunteers, ten each in their 20s, 30s, and 40s. The male-to-female ratio in each age group was 1:1. Elbow MRI was performed without traction and with 3, 5, and 7 kg axial traction. We evaluated joint space width (JW), humeral articular cartilage visibility, and intraprocedural pain/discomfort. We measured JW and cartilage visibility at the RC and the lateral and medial thirds of the ulnohumeral joint. Results: The older age groups exhibited narrower JWs without traction. Axial traction increased the JW and improved the visibility of the RC in all age groups. No significant differences were observed in the ulnohumeral joint’s lateral or medial thirds, but pain and discomfort increased with heavier traction weights. Conclusions: For participants in their 20s and 30s, axial traction of 3 kg seemed appropriate, while 7 kg traction was considered for those in their 40s.
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; traction; elbow; articular cartilage; age magnetic resonance imaging; traction; elbow; articular cartilage; age

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kohyama, S.; Ikeda, K.; Okamoto, Y.; Yoshii, Y. Traction MRI of the Elbow: Age-Based Effects and Implications. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192165

AMA Style

Kohyama S, Ikeda K, Okamoto Y, Yoshii Y. Traction MRI of the Elbow: Age-Based Effects and Implications. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(19):2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kohyama, Sho, Kazuhiro Ikeda, Yoshikazu Okamoto, and Yuichi Yoshii. 2024. "Traction MRI of the Elbow: Age-Based Effects and Implications" Diagnostics 14, no. 19: 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192165

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop