Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Assessment of Body Composition in Cirrhosis
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Sarcoidosis by Immunological Features Using Machine Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Using Electroencephalography to Quantify Communication between Electrode Pairs

by
Yuan Ma
1,2,*,
Jeffrey Keith Spaneas Bland
1 and
Tsutomu Fujinami
2
1
Development Division, FOVE Inc., Tokyo 1070061, Japan
2
School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi 9231292, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2189; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192189
Submission received: 15 August 2024 / Revised: 22 September 2024 / Accepted: 27 September 2024 / Published: 30 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics)

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of dementia subtypes is crucial for optimizing treatment planning and enhancing caregiving strategies. To date, the accuracy of classifying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) using electroencephalogram (EEG) data has been lower than that of distinguishing individuals with these diseases from healthy elderly controls (HCs). This limitation has impeded the feasibility of a cost-effective differential diagnosis for the two subtypes in clinical settings. This study addressed this issue by quantifying communication between electrode pairs in EEG data, along with demographic information, as features to train machine learning (support vector machine) models. Our focus was on refining the feature set specifically for AD-FTD classification. Using our initial feature set, we achieved classification accuracies of 76.9% for AD-HC, 90.4% for FTD-HC, and 91.5% for AD-FTD. Notably, feature importance analyses revealed that the features influencing AD-HC classification are unnecessary for distinguishing between AD and FTD. Eliminating these unnecessary features improved the classification accuracy of AD-FTD to 96.6%. We concluded that communication between electrode pairs specifically involved in the neurological pathology of FTD, but not AD, enables highly accurate EEG-based AD-FTD classification.
Keywords: dementia; Alzheimer’s disease; frontotemporal dementia; electroencephalogram; machine learning; support vector machine dementia; Alzheimer’s disease; frontotemporal dementia; electroencephalogram; machine learning; support vector machine

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Y.; Bland, J.K.S.; Fujinami, T. Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Using Electroencephalography to Quantify Communication between Electrode Pairs. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192189

AMA Style

Ma Y, Bland JKS, Fujinami T. Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Using Electroencephalography to Quantify Communication between Electrode Pairs. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(19):2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Yuan, Jeffrey Keith Spaneas Bland, and Tsutomu Fujinami. 2024. "Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Using Electroencephalography to Quantify Communication between Electrode Pairs" Diagnostics 14, no. 19: 2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop