Next Article in Journal
MaskAppendix: Backbone-Enriched Mask R-CNN Based on Grad-CAM for Automatic Appendix Segmentation
Next Article in Special Issue
Spontaneous Transvaginal Small Bowel Evisceration After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Previous Article in Journal
Adenomyosis and Adolescence: A Challenging Diagnosis and Complex Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Secondary Angle Closure Glaucoma in Weill–Marchesani Syndrome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Central Nervous System Involvement and Neuroradiological Imaging Insights of Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis in Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Eberhard Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(21), 2345; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212345
Submission received: 24 September 2024 / Revised: 18 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 22 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images)

Abstract

:
Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are pigmented lesions present at birth, varying widely in size and clinical impact. In rare instances, these nevi become visible during the first months of life, a phenomenon known as tardive melanocytic nevi (tardive CMN). Giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMN) are defined as nevi larger than 40 cm in projected adult size (PAS). Their association with the central nervous system (CNS) poses significant risks, including melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis (NCM), where melanocytes infiltrate the CNS, potentially causing seizures, hydrocephalus, and, rarely, CNS melanoma. MRI is recommended for GCMN patients, particularly those with numerous satellite nevi or neurological symptoms, to detect CNS involvement. The Nevosurgery Network recommends MRI examinations in cases of GCMN (>40 cm PAS), the presence of over 20 concomitant nevi, and neurological symptoms requiring clarification. CMN can be associated with melanocyte accumulations and melanin deposits in the brain, spinal cord, and leptomeninges.

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) show considerable variability in color, color irregularity, surface, texture, presence of superficial or deep nodules, and extent of hypertrichosis. Studies have been unable to demonstrate any prognostic relevance of these morphological features for the risk of melanoma [1]. Therefore, the most important prognostic parameters are the size and number of accompanying nevi. Concerning localization, head and extremity nevi have a lower tendency to degenerate than trunk nevi [2,3]. A common classification system distinguishes between four size categories for CMN, which are abbreviated as SCMN (small, <1.5 cm), MCMN (medium, 1.5–20 cm), LCMN (large, >20–40 cm), and GCMN (giant, >40 cm), in relation to the expected size at adulthood, which is calculated using the projected adult size (PAS) formula [4].
CMN with similar diameters can exhibit significant differences in other characteristics. In particular, the number of accompanying nevi is a considerable factor. The presence of more than 20 accompanying nevi indicates an elevated risk of central nervous system (CNS) involvement [5]. The combination of cutaneous and CNS manifestations is called neurocutaneous melanocytosis or neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM). If two or more CMN are present, an MRI is recommended if their diameter exceeds 1.5 cm [6,7]. The Nevosurgery Network, therefore, recommends MRI examinations in cases of GCMN (>40 cm projected adult size (PAS)), and/or the presence of >20 concomitant nevi, and/or neurological symptoms requiring clarification [8]. In addition, there is a rare clinical phenotype in which children do not have a distinctly large main nevus but rather multiple, usually three to ten, medium-sized CMN. This phenotype is associated with an exceptionally high risk of symptomatic CNS involvement. It is referred to as “multiple medium-sized MCMN” (mMCMN) [4,9,10]. An MRI should be performed on these children in all cases.
For illustrative purposes, the CNS findings of the two presented 11- and 23-day-old female patients (Figure 1) with a GCMN and over 50 accompanying nevi are depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3 for the first patient and Figure 4 for the second patient, respectively. MRI acquisition parameters are shown in Table 1. When the CNS is involved, it is crucial to differentiate between focal melanosis of the brain parenchyma, which is more prevalent, and disseminated or diffuse melanosis of the leptomeninges. While focal melanosis is more likely to precipitate epileptic seizures, diffuse melanosis is significantly more frequently associated with complications such as hydrocephalus or even cerebral melanoma formation [7]. At the age of the two presented patients, neural melanosis is not obscured by myelination and can be visualized without contrast. As the brain matures (myelination, size) over the middle and later months of the first year, the melanosis becomes more difficult to identify and additional contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences might be necessary [11]. In view of the literature, as in our two patients, there are manifestations, in particular, of the temporal lobe, cerebellum, pons, and/or medulla, and possibly also an increased incidence of arachnoid cysts [12].
With evidence of CNS involvement on MRI, the localization of the melanin is crucial. Developmental abnormalities and indications for neurosurgical intervention are significantly more prevalent in patients with both cutaneous and leptomeningeal seeding of melanin on MRI in contrast to patients with focal intraparenchymal melanin localization [7]. Current studies with limited follow-up time show that the rate of melanoma is higher with positive MRI (detection of melanin in the CNS) than in patients with negative MRI (12% vs. 2%) [17].
A common query concerns the necessity of additional follow-up MRIs. There is a lack of consensus on specific further screening and recommendations [14]. Even if an initial MRI shows an abnormality, an imaging follow-up should typically only be performed if there is a change in the clinical findings, e.g., neurological symptoms. The management of CMN has shifted towards individualized care, emphasizing the balance between malignancy risk and the psychosocial impact of visible lesions. Surgical treatment, often performed for cosmetic reasons, is now approached more conservatively, aiming to minimize surgical burden while improving cosmetic outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach involving dermatological, surgical, neurological, and psychological care is essential for addressing the complex needs of CMN patients [1,8].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; Methodology, all authors; Validation, all authors; Investigation, all authors; Data Curation, all authors; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, all authors; Writing—Review and Editing, all authors; Visualization, all authors; Supervision, M.B. and T.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Tübingen.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients’ parents to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mologousis, M.A.; Tsai, S.Y.C.; Tissera, K.A.; Levin, Y.S.; Hawryluk, E.B. Updates in the Management of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi. Children 2024, 11, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bett, B.J. Large or multiple congenital melanocytic nevi: Occurrence of cutaneous melanoma in 1008 persons. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 52, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. DeDavid, M.; Orlow, S.J.; Provost, N.; Marghoob, A.A.; Rao, B.K.; Huang, C.L.; Wasti, Q.; Kopf, A.W.; Bart, R.S. A study of large congenital melanocytic nevi and associated malignant melanomas: Review of cases in the New York University Registry and the world literature. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1997, 36 Pt 1, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Krengel, S.; Scope, A.; Dusza, S.W.; Vonthein, R.; Marghoob, A.A. New recommendations for the categorization of cutaneous features of congenital melanocytic nevi. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013, 68, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marghoob, A.A.; Dusza, S.; Oliveria, S.; Halpern, A.C. Number of satellite nevi as a correlate for neurocutaneous melanocytosis in patients with large congenital melanocytic nevi. Arch. Dermatol. 2004, 140, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Neale, H.; Plumptre, I.; Belazarian, L.; Wiss, K.; Hawryluk, E.B. Central nervous system magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities and neurologic outcomes in pediatric patients with congenital nevi: A 10-year multi-institutional retrospective study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2022, 87, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Waelchli, R.; Aylett, S.E.; Atherton, D.; Thompson, D.J.; Chong, W.K.; Kinsler, V.A. Classification of neurological abnormalities in children with congenital melanocytic naevus syndrome identifies magnetic resonance imaging as the best predictor of clinical outcome. Br. J. Dermatol. 2015, 173, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ott, H.; Krengel, S.; Beck, O.; Böhler, K.; Böttcher-Haberzeth, S.; Cangir, Ö.; Fattouh, M.; Häberle, B.; Hüging, M.; Königs, I.; et al. Multidisciplinary long-term care and modern surgical treatment of congenital melanocytic nevi—Recommendations by the CMN surgery network. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2019, 17, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Neuhold, J.C.; Friesenhahn, J.; Gerdes, N.; Krengel, S. Case reports of fatal or metastasizing melanoma in children and adolescents: A systematic analysis of the literature. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2015, 32, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Price, H.N.; Schaffer, J.V. Congenital melanocytic nevi-when to worry and how to treat: Facts and controversies. Clin. Dermatol. 2010, 28, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Barnhill, R.L.; Fleischli, M. Histologic features of congenital melanocytic nevi in infants 1 year of age or younger. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1995, 33 Pt 1, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Escandon-Perez, S.; Landeta-Sa, A.P.; González-Jasso, Y.; Arenas-Guzmán, R. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. 2019, 76, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Arneja, J.S.; Gosain, A.K. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009, 124, 1e–13e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ruiz-Maldonado, R.; Tamayo, L.; Laterza, A.M.; Durán, C. Giant pigmented nevi: Clinical, histopathologic, and therapeutic considerations. J. Pediatr. 1992, 120, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fenton, D.A.; Mayou, B.; Atherton, D.; Black, M.M. Histopathology of Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevi—Implications for Treatment. Br. J. Dermatol. 1987, 117, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Polubothu, S.; McGuire, N.; Al-Olabi, L.; Baird, W.; Bulstrode, N.; Chalker, J.; Josifova, D.; Lomas, D.; O’Hara, J.; Ong, J.; et al. Does the gene matter? Genotype-phenotype and genotype-outcome associations in congenital melanocytic naevi. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 182, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kinsler, V.A.; O’Hare, P.; Bulstrode, N.; Calonje, J.E.; Chong, W.K.; Hargrave, D.; Jacques, T.; Lomas, D.; Sebire, N.J.; Slater, O. Melanoma in congenital melanocytic naevi. Br. J. Dermatol. 2017, 176, 1131–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Images of two 11- and 23-day-old female patients with congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) showing multiple small- to medium-sized nevi (>50) all over the body, including the head (A,B) and extremities (B). A giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMN) extends over the back and encircles the torso (B). The clinical term CMN encompasses a range of melanocytic spots and plaques with varying characteristics. Any skin location may be affected. In many children, CMN manifest as isolated skin moles, whereas in others, they are accompanied by numerous satellite nevi, sometimes referred to as so-called accompanying nevi. CMN are typically distinguished by the presence of nevomelanocytes, or nevus cells, which form well-ordered clusters in the epidermis and organize into cords, sheets, or nests within the dermis. In contrast to acquired nevi, CMN are more likely to extend deeper into the dermis or even into the subcutaneous fat layer [11]. These nevus cells frequently congregate in the vicinity of dermal appendages, including hair follicles, neurovascular structures, and sebaceous glands [11,12]. Additionally, they may extend as cords of cells between collagen bundles in the reticular dermis [13]. Besides showing deep dermal involvement in the neonatal period, the nevus cell depth is not modified with age [14,15]. Concerning genetics, CMN of all sizes are most commonly caused by mutations in the NRAS gene. Mutations in BRAF are a much rarer cause of multiple CMN and are frequently associated with a multinodular phenotype. In a patient cohort presented by Polubothu et al., there was no correlation between genotype and differences in the incidence of neurological disease during childhood [16].
Figure 1. Images of two 11- and 23-day-old female patients with congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) showing multiple small- to medium-sized nevi (>50) all over the body, including the head (A,B) and extremities (B). A giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMN) extends over the back and encircles the torso (B). The clinical term CMN encompasses a range of melanocytic spots and plaques with varying characteristics. Any skin location may be affected. In many children, CMN manifest as isolated skin moles, whereas in others, they are accompanied by numerous satellite nevi, sometimes referred to as so-called accompanying nevi. CMN are typically distinguished by the presence of nevomelanocytes, or nevus cells, which form well-ordered clusters in the epidermis and organize into cords, sheets, or nests within the dermis. In contrast to acquired nevi, CMN are more likely to extend deeper into the dermis or even into the subcutaneous fat layer [11]. These nevus cells frequently congregate in the vicinity of dermal appendages, including hair follicles, neurovascular structures, and sebaceous glands [11,12]. Additionally, they may extend as cords of cells between collagen bundles in the reticular dermis [13]. Besides showing deep dermal involvement in the neonatal period, the nevus cell depth is not modified with age [14,15]. Concerning genetics, CMN of all sizes are most commonly caused by mutations in the NRAS gene. Mutations in BRAF are a much rarer cause of multiple CMN and are frequently associated with a multinodular phenotype. In a patient cohort presented by Polubothu et al., there was no correlation between genotype and differences in the incidence of neurological disease during childhood [16].
Diagnostics 14 02345 g001
Figure 2. MR imaging of an 11-day-old female patient with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) using an MRI-compatible incubator. (AC) Imaging findings of leptomeningeal (white arrowhead) and intraparenchymal melanosis (red arrowhead) demonstrate a high T1 signal, especially in the pons, cerebellum, and amygdala. These findings are not sufficiently detectable in T2-weighted (B) or T2 star (C) sequences (white arrowhead), at most a slight signal reduction in T2-weighted sequences. The patient also has an infratentorial arachnoid cyst (blue arrow). Spinal MRI showed no abnormalities (not shown). T1w = T1-weighted; T2w = T2-weighted; T2* = T2 star.
Figure 2. MR imaging of an 11-day-old female patient with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) using an MRI-compatible incubator. (AC) Imaging findings of leptomeningeal (white arrowhead) and intraparenchymal melanosis (red arrowhead) demonstrate a high T1 signal, especially in the pons, cerebellum, and amygdala. These findings are not sufficiently detectable in T2-weighted (B) or T2 star (C) sequences (white arrowhead), at most a slight signal reduction in T2-weighted sequences. The patient also has an infratentorial arachnoid cyst (blue arrow). Spinal MRI showed no abnormalities (not shown). T1w = T1-weighted; T2w = T2-weighted; T2* = T2 star.
Diagnostics 14 02345 g002
Figure 3. MR imaging of an 11-day-old female patient with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) using an MRI-compatible incubator. (AD) Imaging findings of leptomeningeal (white arrowhead) and intraparenchymal melanosis (red arrowhead) demonstrate a high T1 signal in sagittal and corresponding axial planes. The image examples illustrate that acquiring two different planes of T1-weighted sequences is advantageous, as it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal manifestations. The patient also has an infratentorial arachnoid cyst ((A), blue arrow). T1w = T1-weighted.
Figure 3. MR imaging of an 11-day-old female patient with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) using an MRI-compatible incubator. (AD) Imaging findings of leptomeningeal (white arrowhead) and intraparenchymal melanosis (red arrowhead) demonstrate a high T1 signal in sagittal and corresponding axial planes. The image examples illustrate that acquiring two different planes of T1-weighted sequences is advantageous, as it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal manifestations. The patient also has an infratentorial arachnoid cyst ((A), blue arrow). T1w = T1-weighted.
Diagnostics 14 02345 g003
Figure 4. MR imaging of a 23-day-old female patient with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) using an MRI-compatible incubator. (AE) Intraparenchymal (red arrowhead) and leptomeningeal (white arrowhead) melanosis imaging findings demonstrate a high T1 signal. The acquired sagittal and corresponding axial image examples (AD) illustrate that acquiring two different planes of T1-weighted sequences is advantageous, as it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal manifestations. The patient also has an infratentorial arachnoid cyst ((A,C) blue arrow). (F) Spinal MRI showed no abnormalities. T1w = T1-weighted.
Figure 4. MR imaging of a 23-day-old female patient with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM) using an MRI-compatible incubator. (AE) Intraparenchymal (red arrowhead) and leptomeningeal (white arrowhead) melanosis imaging findings demonstrate a high T1 signal. The acquired sagittal and corresponding axial image examples (AD) illustrate that acquiring two different planes of T1-weighted sequences is advantageous, as it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal manifestations. The patient also has an infratentorial arachnoid cyst ((A,C) blue arrow). (F) Spinal MRI showed no abnormalities. T1w = T1-weighted.
Diagnostics 14 02345 g004
Table 1. MRI acquisition parameters using the 1.5 T scanner Magnetom Aera (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).
Table 1. MRI acquisition parameters using the 1.5 T scanner Magnetom Aera (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).
Parameters BrainSpine
T1 SE
Axial
T1 SE
Sagittal
T1 SE
Coronal
T2 TSE
Axial
T2*
Axial
T1 TSE
Sagittal
Field of view (mm)160160160160200260
Voxel size (mm)0.6 × 0.6 × 3.00.6 × 0.6 × 3.00.6 × 0.6 × 3.00.6 × 0.6 × 3.00.4 × 0.4 × 4.00.3 × 0.3 × 2.0
Slice thickness (mm)333342
Number of slices322426322216
Base resolution256256256256256432
TR (ms)6105105526600828400
TE (ms)11121210424.612
Averages322535
Concatenations111112
Flip angle60606012620112
SE = Spin Echo; TSE = Turbo Spin Echo; T2* = T2 star; TR = repetition time; TE = echo time.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruff, C.; Gohla, G.; Nägele, T.; Batra, M. Central Nervous System Involvement and Neuroradiological Imaging Insights of Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis in Congenital Melanocytic Nevi. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212345

AMA Style

Ruff C, Gohla G, Nägele T, Batra M. Central Nervous System Involvement and Neuroradiological Imaging Insights of Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis in Congenital Melanocytic Nevi. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(21):2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruff, Christer, Georg Gohla, Thomas Nägele, and Marion Batra. 2024. "Central Nervous System Involvement and Neuroradiological Imaging Insights of Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis in Congenital Melanocytic Nevi" Diagnostics 14, no. 21: 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212345

APA Style

Ruff, C., Gohla, G., Nägele, T., & Batra, M. (2024). Central Nervous System Involvement and Neuroradiological Imaging Insights of Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis in Congenital Melanocytic Nevi. Diagnostics, 14(21), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop