Evaluating Novel Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine
1. Introduction
- Disease Diagnosis: Biomarkers can assist in the early recognition and diagnosis of disease, mainly in targeting molecular signatures or definite abnormalities that are linked to a condition. For example, high levels of certain proteins in the blood could signify cancer is present in the body.
- Prognosis of Disease: Biomarkers may also become useful information tools for prognosis, that is, predicting how a disease is likely to develop or run its course. This is able to help physicians estimate how the disease will progress over time, the risk of it recurring, and overall survival rates, which all help to manage patients and aid in the prescription of treatments.
- Choice of Treatment: Biomarkers can help to decide who may best be treated using a particular therapy. Biomarker-guided therapy can hence select the right treatment for the right patients based on individual characteristics so as to optimize the treatment efficacy and minimize any adverse effects.
- Biomarker assessment can be used to monitor the response to treatment to longitudinally capture its course and any deviations that occur in biological markers associated with disease progression or the therapeutic response from baseline to the final round. In general, the use of biomarkers is increasing across the board and within different medical disciplines to further develop personalized medicine and deliver precision healthcare.
- Biomarker identification and selection: Relevant biomarker candidates are identified based on preclinical studies, exploratory analyses, and literature reviews and should be related to the indication of these studies, if relevant. A biomarker is a molecular, cellular, or imaging-based characteristic that facilitates distinguishing between the different stages of a disease and predicting the impact of therapeutic interventions.
- Analytical validation: This is how the technical performance characteristics of an assay measuring biomarkers or of the method of measurement itself are examined. Here, the parameters evaluated are the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and robustness of biomarker measurement to ensure its reliability across laboratories and platforms.
- Validation of clinical utility: In addition to defining diagnostic or prognostic accuracy, validation of a biomarker includes evaluation of its clinical utility, where clinical utility means the impact of using a biomarker on patient management decisions, therapeutic outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization.
- Long-term monitoring and further research: Following regulatory approval and adoption into practice, monitoring and further research will have to continue with a view to realizing in real-life settings what can be achieved using biomarker-guided interventions, including their long-term safety and effectiveness. Finally, the execution of follow-up post-marketing surveillance, longitudinal observational studies, and comparative effective research aimed at refining clinical algorithms and optimizing the patient outcomes may be required.
2. Brief Overview and List of Contributions
3. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
List of Contributions
- Somay E, Topkan E, Yilmaz B, Besen AA, Mertsoylu H, Selek U. Predicting Teeth Extraction after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using the Novel GLUCAR Index. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 4;13(23):3594. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233594.
- Stan A, Călburean PA, Drinkal RK, Harpa M, Elkahlout A, Nicolae VC, Tomșa F, Hadadi L, Brînzaniuc K, Suciu H, Mărușteri M. Inflammatory Status Assessment by Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Treated by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;13(18):2907. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182907.
- Radić J, Lovrić Kojundžić S, Gelemanović A, Vučković M, Budimir Mršić D, Šupe Domić D, Novaković MD, Radić M. Serum Adropin Levels and Body Mass Composition in Kidney Transplant Recipients-Are There Sex Differences? Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 26;13(17):2768. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172768.
- Motoc NȘ, Făgărășan I, Urda-Cîmpean AE, Todea DA. Prognosis Predictive Markers in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and COVID-19. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;13(15):2597. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152597.
- Rusu CC, Kacso I, Moldovan D, Potra A, Tirinescu D, Ticala M, Rotar AM, Orasan R, Budurea C, Barar A, Anton F, Valea A, Bondor CI, Ticolea M. Triiodothyronine and Protein Malnutrition Could Influence Pulse Wave Velocity in Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 24;13(14):2462. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142462.
- Cujba L, Stan C, Samoila O, Drugan T, Benedec Cutas A, Nicula C. Identifying Optical Coherence Tomography Markers for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis and Management. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;13(12):2077. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122077.
- Gheban-Roșca IA, Gheban BA, Pop B, Mironescu DC, Siserman VC, Jianu EM, Drugan T, Bolboacă SD. Identification of Histopathological Biomarkers in Fatal Cases of Coronavirus Disease: A Study on Lung Tissue. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;13(12):2039. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122039.
- Mocan LP, Rusu I, Melincovici CS, Boșca BA, Mocan T, Crăciun R, Spârchez Z, Iacobescu M, Mihu CM. The Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Differential Diagnosis between Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastasis, as Well as Its Prognostic Value. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;13(9):1542. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091542.
- Nechita VI, Hajjar NA, Drugan C, Cătană CS, Moiş E, Nechita MA, Graur F. Chitotriosidase and Neopterin as Two Novel Potential Biomarkers for Advanced Stage and Survival Prediction in Gastric Cancer-A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;13(7):1362. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071362.
- Park SY, Cho DG, Shim BY, Cho U. Relationship between Systemic Inflammatory Markers, GLUT1 Expression, and Maximum 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Their Prognostic Significance. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;13(6):1013. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061013.
- Chiș IA, Andrei V, Muntean A, Moldovan M, Mesaroș AȘ, Dudescu MC, Ilea A. Salivary Biomarkers of Anti-Epileptic Drugs: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 4;13(11):1962. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111962.
References
- Curry, T.B.; Matteson, E.L.; Stewart, A.K. Introduction to the Symposium on Precision Medicine. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2017, 92, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sigman, M. Introduction: Personalized medicine: What is it and what are the challenges? Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 944–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bartlett, M.G.; Chen, B. Editor-in-Chief editorial and introduction to ‘Metabolomics and biomarkers’ special issue. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2016, 30, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kerioui, M.; Bertrand, J.; Bruno, R.; Mercier, F.; Guedj, J.; Desmée, S. Modelling the association between biomarkers and clinical outcome: An introduction to nonlinear joint models. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 88, 1452–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Drugan, T.; Leucuța, D. Evaluating Novel Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060587
Drugan T, Leucuța D. Evaluating Novel Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(6):587. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060587
Chicago/Turabian StyleDrugan, Tudor, and Daniel Leucuța. 2024. "Evaluating Novel Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine" Diagnostics 14, no. 6: 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060587
APA StyleDrugan, T., & Leucuța, D. (2024). Evaluating Novel Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine. Diagnostics, 14(6), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060587