Next Article in Journal
Discrepancy in the Histological Diagnoses of Oral Lichen Planus Based on WHO Criteria Versus the Newly Proposed Diagnostic Set of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Xpert® Carba-R Assay Performance from FecalSwab™ Samples
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Many Hidden Faces of Gallbladder Carcinoma on CT and MRI Imaging—From A to Z
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue “Imaging Diagnosis in the Abdomen”—A Step Forward in Diagnostic Precision

by
Piero Boraschi
* and
Francescamaria Donati
2nd Unit of Radiology, Department of Radiological Nuclear and Laboratory Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(5), 557; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050557
Submission received: 6 February 2025 / Accepted: 13 February 2025 / Published: 25 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging Diagnosis in Abdomen)
Abdominal imaging has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, driven by the rapid evolution of diagnostic technologies and their integration into clinical practice. With an expanding range of advanced imaging techniques—such as MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents [1], diffusion and perfusion imaging [2], contrast-enhanced ultrasound [3], and spectral imaging via dual-energy, multi-energy, and photon-counting CT [4,5]—there has been a revolution in disease detection, staging, and treatment planning. These innovations have greatly enhanced diagnostic accuracy and patient care, particularly in the management of complex abdominal diseases.
Despite these advancements, significant gaps remain in our understanding of certain disease processes and the optimal utilization of emerging imaging modalities. One of the key challenges moving forward is the need for further validation and standardization of newer techniques, such as perfusion imaging and spectral CT, across diverse clinical settings. Additionally, while the potential of advanced imaging in assessing tumor vascularity and predicting prognosis is promising, more research is required to fully leverage these capabilities in personalized treatment planning [6].
The contributions to this Special Issue on Imaging Diagnosis in the Abdomen have addressed some of these gaps by presenting the latest advancements in imaging technology and its application in the diagnosis of complex abdominal conditions. For example, studies like Wang et al.’s exploration of multi-slice CT for predicting the pathological risk of gastric stromal tumors [7] and Zaborienė et al.’s use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing pancreatic cancer [8] highlight the ongoing progress in tumor characterization and risk stratification. However, while these studies underscore the promise of advanced imaging techniques, they also point to areas where additional research is needed, particularly in improving the accuracy of tumor grading and enhancing non-invasive diagnostic strategies.
Looking forward, the future of abdominal imaging will likely be shaped by further innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) [9,10]. These technologies have the potential to automate image analysis, improve diagnostic accuracy, and facilitate real-time decision-making. In particular, AI and ML algorithms could play a critical role in integrating multimodal imaging data, enabling clinicians to generate more holistic assessments of disease. Moreover, the increasing role of imaging in monitoring therapeutic responses, particularly in immunotherapy [11,12], will require new frameworks to assess treatment efficacy and tailoring interventions.
While this Special Issue highlights the progress made in abdominal imaging, it also emphasizes the need for continued research to optimize imaging techniques for early disease detection, enhance diagnostic workflows, and improve patient outcomes. Future studies should focus on the development of more refined imaging biomarkers, the greater standardization of imaging protocols, and the potential applications of artificial intelligence in clinical radiology. These efforts will undoubtedly be pivotal in advancing the field and addressing the unmet needs in abdominal imaging.
The research presented in this Special Issue will continue to serve as a valuable resource, laying the foundation for future investigations and shaping the direction of abdominal imaging in the years to come.

Funding

This paper did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Seale, M.K.; Catalano, O.A.; Saini, S.; Hahn, P.F.; Sahani, D.V. Hepatobiliary Specific MR Contrast Agents: Role in Imaging the Liver and Biliary Tree. Radiographics 2009, 29, 1725–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chandarana, H.; Taouli, B. Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging of the Liver. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010, 76, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. D’Onofrio, M.; Crosara, S.; De Robertis, R.; Canestrini, S.; Mucelli, R.P. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2015, 205, W56–W66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Greffier, J.; Villani, N.; Defez, D.; Dabli, D.; Si-Mohamed, S. Spectral CT Imaging: Technical Principles of Dual-Energy CT and Multi-Energy Photon-Counting CT. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2023, 104, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Onishi, H.; Tsuboyama, T.; Nakamoto, A.; Ota, T.; Fukui, H.; Tatsumi, M.; Honda, T.; Kiso, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Kaketaka, K.; et al. Photon-Counting CT: Technical Features and Clinical Impact on Abdominal Imaging. Abdom. Radiol. 2024, 49, 4383–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. European Society of Radiology (ESR). Medical Imaging in Personalised Medicine: A White Paper of the Research Committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 2015, 6, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, S.; Dai, P.; Si, G.; Zeng, M.; Wang, M. Multi-Slice CT Features Predict Pathological Risk Classification in Gastric Stromal Tumors Larger Than 2 cm: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zaborienė, I.; Strakšytė, V.; Ignatavičius, P.; Barauskas, G.; Dambrauskienė, R.; Žvinienė, K. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Perfusion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Different Tumor Grade: A Preliminary Single Center Study. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Syed, A.B.; Zoga, A.C. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Current Technology and Future Directions. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2018, 22, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Najjar, R. Redefining Radiology: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Medical Imaging. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nishino, M.; Hatabu, H.; Hodi, F.S. Imaging of Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Radiology 2019, 290, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dercle, L.; Sun, S.; Seban, R.D.; Mekki, A.; Sun, R.; Tselikas, L.; Hans, S.; Bernard-Tessier, A.; Bouvier, F.M.; Aide, N.; et al. Emerging and Evolving Concepts in Cancer Immunotherapy Imaging. Radiology 2023, 306, e239003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boraschi, P.; Donati, F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Imaging Diagnosis in the Abdomen”—A Step Forward in Diagnostic Precision. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050557

AMA Style

Boraschi P, Donati F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Imaging Diagnosis in the Abdomen”—A Step Forward in Diagnostic Precision. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(5):557. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050557

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boraschi, Piero, and Francescamaria Donati. 2025. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Imaging Diagnosis in the Abdomen”—A Step Forward in Diagnostic Precision" Diagnostics 15, no. 5: 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050557

APA Style

Boraschi, P., & Donati, F. (2025). Editorial for the Special Issue “Imaging Diagnosis in the Abdomen”—A Step Forward in Diagnostic Precision. Diagnostics, 15(5), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050557

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop