Next Article in Journal
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated with Metformin and Sulphonylureas’ Glycaemic Response among South African Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Maturated Early-Stage Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Improve Cardiac Function by Enhancing Segmental Contraction in Infarcted Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Pain Standards for Accredited Healthcare Organizations (ACDON Project): A Mixed Methods Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/jpm11020103
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Endothelium as a Target for Anti-Atherogenic Therapy: A Focus on the Epigenetic Enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1

by
Jolien Fledderus
1,†,
Byambasuren Vanchin
1,2,†,
Marianne G. Rots
3 and
Guido Krenning
1,*
1
Medical Biology Section, Laboratory for Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Department Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 (EA11), 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Department Cardiology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Jamyan St 3, Ulaanbaatar 14210, Mongolia
3
Epigenetic Editing, Medical Biology Section, Department Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 (EA11), 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Authors contributed equally.
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(2), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020103
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 2 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 February 2021 / Published: 5 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Cell Plasticity and Tissue Remodeling in the Cardiovascular System)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endothelial cell inflammatory activation and dysfunction are key events in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, and are associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular events. Yet, therapies specifically targeting the endothelium and atherosclerosis are lacking. Here, we review how endothelial behaviour affects atherogenesis and pose that the endothelium may be an efficacious cellular target for antiatherogenic therapies. We discuss the contribution of endothelial inflammatory activation and dysfunction to atherogenesis and postulate that the dysregulation of specific epigenetic enzymes, EZH2 and SIRT1, aggravate endothelial dysfunction in a pleiotropic fashion. Moreover, we propose that commercially available drugs are available to clinically explore this postulation.

1. Introduction

Atherosclerosis is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases and underlies pathologies such as heart attack, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease [1]. Atherosclerosis is a progressive inflammatory vascular disease, characterized by the thickening and hardening of the artery walls and the formation of atherosclerotic plaques, wherein lipids, extracellular matrix, immune cells, smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and (myo)fibroblasts accumulate [2]. The plaque progressively hardens and narrows the arteries, impairing blood flow. The rupture of unstable plaques may lead to thrombosis, one of the major clinical complications of atherosclerosis [3,4,5].
It is well established that endothelial cells (ECs) are majorly important in the maintenance of vascular homeostasis through the regulation of processes including vascular permeability, vascular tone, inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation and thrombogenesis (reviewed in [6]). Endothelial dysfunction, the pathological state wherein a disbalance in these processes occurs, contributes to atherosclerosis development (reviewed in [7,8,9,10]). For example, oscillatory shear stress (OSS), as seen in aortic bifurcations, increases the susceptibility to atherosclerosis by the downregulation of ERK5, a kinase which evokes nitric oxide (NO) production and inhibits leukocyte–endothelial adhesion [11]. In mice lacking ERK5, atherosclerotic plaque formation is aggravated [12,13]. Corroboratively, alleviation of EC dysfunction reduces atherogenic plaque development [14,15], and may even evoke the regression of preestablished plaques [16].
These observations underscore the importance of endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis and progression of atherosclerosis and suggest that the endothelium may be an efficacious cellular target for antiatherogenic therapies. Remarkably, the clinically available therapies for atherosclerosis are symptomatic and focus on lowering circulating lipid levels, reducing the inflammatory processes, and the prevention of blood clotting [17]. Interestingly, no therapy is available that targets the dysfunctional endothelium. Here, we discuss the contribution of endothelial dysfunction to atherosclerosis development and progression, and postulate that the dysregulation of specific epigenetic enzymes aggravates endothelial dysfunction in a pleiotropic fashion. Moreover, we propose that commercially available drugs are available to clinically explore this postulation.

2. The Atherosclerotic Endothelium

The endothelium forms the innermost layer of all blood vessels. The healthy quiescent endothelium mediates vascular homeostasis by the inhibition of unwarranted inflammation, blood clotting, vasoconstriction, and the maintenance of the vascular barrier. Endothelial dysfunction manifests in lesion-prone areas of the vasculature and refers to a pro-inflammatory, prothrombotic and vasoconstrictive state of the endothelium wherein vascular permeability is often increased [7,8,9,10]. Endothelial dysfunction contributes to the development of atherosclerosis, which is exemplified by the clinical observation that atherosclerotic cardiovascular events occur at a higher frequency in patients with severe endothelial dysfunction than in patients with mild or moderated endothelial dysfunction [18]. Indeed, most atherosclerosis risk factors activate the endothelium and may induce endothelial dysfunction [10]. In this section, we discuss the mechanisms by which endothelial dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis.

2.1. Endothelial Cell Activation, Dysfunction and the Formation of a Fatty Streak

Endothelial activation, triggered by atherosclerosis risk factors including oxidized lipids and inflammatory cytokines, is generally regarded as the first stage of atherogenesis (Figure 1). Endothelial cell activation results in the loss of intercellular junctions [19] and therefore affects the permeability of the vessel wall to infiltrating macromolecules such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In the vessel wall, LDL-C undergoes oxidative modifications via its interaction with reactive oxygen species (ROS), and it is well recognized that this oxidized LDL-C (oxLDL) is pro-inflammatory and a major trigger of atherogenesis (reviewed in [20,21]).
Endothelial cells contribute to the increase in ROS in the vessel wall. In the healthy endothelium, the vasodilator nitric oxide (NO) is synthesized by the enzyme endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) [22,23] and endothelial cell-derived NO prevents the oxidation of LDL-C [7]. However, in activated endothelial cells, the production of NO is suppressed [24], resulting in increased vasoconstriction and an increase in the oxidation of LDL-C. The suppression of NO biosynthesis and LDL-C oxidation is perpetuated in the fatty streak, as oxLDL itself is a potent suppressor of NO synthesis [25]. The resulting “endothelial dysfunction” manifests as the earliest sign of atherogenesis and occurs even before structural changes in the vessel wall are apparent [7,26].

2.2. Inflammatory Cell Infiltration and Inflammation

Inflammation and inflammatory cell infiltration in the vessel wall are well-known contributors to atherosclerosis development, progression and regulators of plaque stability (reviewed [27,28]) (Figure 1). The accumulation of oxLDL in the fatty streak (discussed above), induces the production of a variety of inflammatory molecules by the endothelium, including adhesion molecules (e.g., E-Selectin, VCAM1 and ICAM1), chemotactic proteins (e.g., monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1)) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, TNFα, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)) [29,30].
Interestingly, atherosclerosis susceptibility in mice critically depends on this pro-inflammatory response by the endothelium [31].
The induction of endothelial adhesion molecules expression facilitates the invasion of inflammatory cells into the forming atherosclerotic plaque [32]. For example, E-selectin mediates the rolling of leukocytes along the endothelial surface, whereas VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 mediate firm adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium which is required for extravasation. Indeed, in atherosclerosis prone, VCAM1-deficient mice (ApoE−/−;VCAM1D4D/D4D), fatty streak formation and atherogenesis is blunted when compared to atherosclerosis-prone mice that do express VCAM1 (ApoE−/−VCAM1+/+ mice) [33].
In addition, endothelial cell activation results in the expression of inflammatory cell chemoattractants and mitogens, including MCP-1 and M-CSF. MCP-1 recruits monocytes into the vessel wall, whereas M-CSF induces monocyte proliferation and differentiation into macrophages [34]. In the vessel wall, macrophages phagocytize oxLDL and form foam cells, which aggregate to form an atheromatous core [35], and perpetuates atherogenesis by the amplification of ROS and inflammatory cytokine production [9,36].
Besides the direct pro-inflammatory effects of oxLDL on the endothelium, persistent inflammatory signalling in the atherosclerotic milieu can induce cellular senescence. Cellular senescence is the phenomenon where cells cease to divide in response to telomere shortening or biochemical stress (e.g., ROS accumulation and DNA damage) [37]. Senescent endothelial cells adopt a pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic phenotype, also known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Multiple molecules, including growth factors, cytokines and metalloproteinases, constitute the SASP, which can all promote atherogenesis [38]. Senescent ECs are found at sites of atherogenesis and contribute to the increased vascular permeability, persistent inflammation and ongoing vascular remodelling [39,40].

2.3. Neointima Formation

Intima hyperplasia and neointima formation are the third stage of atherogenesis. This stage is characterized by the formation of a fibrous plaque consisting of accumulating VSMC and inflammatory cells, and extracellular matrix (ECM) in response to the inflammatory milieu (Figure 1). VSMC migrate from the vascular media towards the neointima on a gradient of pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by T cells, macrophages, and foam cells. Recruited VSMC in turn secrete fibrous ECM proteins that contribute to the increase and stiffening of the atherosclerotic plaque [7].
ECs also regulate the proliferation and migration of VSMC in the atherosclerotic plaque. EC-derived NO inhibits the proliferation of VSMC, whereas EC-derived factors such as Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and Angiotensin II (AT2) promote the proliferation of VSMC [41]. As mentioned above, activated ECs at the site of atherogenesis produce less NO, causing a relative shift in the availability of VSMC mitotic factors.
ECs may also directly contribute to neointima formation via the process of mndothelial–mesenchymal transition (EndMT), in which ECs transform into apoptosis-resistant, fibroproliferative mesenchymal-like cells that accumulate in the neointima and the fibrous cap of the atherosclerotic lesion [10,42,43,44]. EndMT may contribute to increased leukocyte extravasation, intimal lipid accumulation, ECM accumulation and oxidative stress in the atherosclerotic plaque [13,16,45,46]. It is increasingly recognized in the field that metastable or partial EndMT occurs in atherosclerosis, in which ECs maintain some of their original endothelial functions, yet express inflammatory cytokines and an abundance of ECM molecules [47].

2.4. Thrombogenesis

The final stage and major complication of atherosclerosis is thrombosis (Figure 1). Thrombosis occurs as a consequence of atherosclerotic plaque rupture and its occurrence critically depends on the vulnerability of a plaque which is determined by the thickness of the fibrous cap [9,36]. More precisely, vulnerable plaques have thin fibrous caps, which are low in VSMC numbers and have a high load of inflammatory cells. The thinning of the cap is promoted by VSMC senescence or death and degradation of the cap’s ECM proteins [48,49,50,51]. Indeed, the proliferation rate of VSMC is higher in early and stable lesions when compared to the proliferation rate of advanced and vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques [52,53,54], suggesting that VSMC senescence may contribute to plaque rupture.
Endothelial cells may also contribute to plaque vulnerability and the concurrent thrombosis via EndMT [46]. Although EndMT increases the number of mesenchymal cells in the fibrous cap, plaque vulnerability counterintuitively associates with increased EndMT, suggesting that the secretome of cells undergoing EndMT may promote ECM destabilization. Indeed, EndMT-derived mesenchymal cells in the fibrous cap secrete various ECM-degrading proteins in high amounts [46] resulting in plaque destabilization.
From the above, it becomes apparent that endothelial damage (i.e., the sum of endothelial activation, endothelial dysfunction, senescence and (partial) EndMT) pivotally contributes to atherogenesis at every stage of pathogenesis (Figure 1). We therefore postulate that the endothelium may serve as an efficacious therapeutic target cell for anti-atherogenic therapies. In the next sections, we review the current available anti-atherogenic therapies and discuss the potential to restore endothelial homeostasis using epigenetic drugs that may alleviate endothelial damage at multiple levels.

3. Current and Experimental Atherosclerosis Therapies

Current medical treatments to prevent atherosclerosis development, progression or plaque rupture include anti-hypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs to reduce atherosclerotic risk burden and anti-thrombogenic therapies to limit the complications of atherosclerosis, whereas experimental therapies primarily focus on anti-inflammatory agents to reduce atherosclerosis progression (Figure 2). In this section, we discuss the currently available clinical and experimental medicaments and their rationale as an anti-atherogenic agent (Table 1).

3.1. Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Drugs

Hypertension is one of the primary risk factors for atherosclerosis. Hypertension accelerates the atherogenesis and a persisting high blood pressure increases plaque vulnerability [55] and the associated risk of major cardiovascular events. Thus, anti-hypertensive medicaments are prescribed to patients unable to lower their blood pressure by dietary- or lifestyle adaptations [56]. Competitive antagonists of the adrenergic beta receptors (commonly known as β-blockers), are inhibitors of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACEi), calcium channel blockers and reduce blood pressure and slow the atherogenic process [57,58,59].
Dyslipidaemia is another primary risk factor for atherosclerosis and lipid-lowering interventions are the principle pharmaceutical intervention for the treatment of atherosclerosis at present [63,74]. Lipid-lowering interventions aim to reduce the residual lipid risk, as epidemiological cohort studies and clinical trials imply that elevated levels of LDL-C and oxLDL strongly associate with atherogenesis and cardiovascular events (reviewed in [75]). β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (commonly known as statins) reduce the production of LDL-C and facilitate LDL-C clearance by increasing LDL receptor expression in the liver [76]. Besides these primary effects, statins are anti-inflammatory [77,78] and increase endothelial NO production through the activation of eNOS [77,79], which may alleviate endothelial dysfunction during atherosclerosis. This pleiotropy of statins may explain why statins outperform other lipid-lowering drugs and are the first-choice medicament for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis. Other commonly prescribed lipid-lowering drugs include the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and cholesterol absorption inhibitors, which both increase LDL-C clearance from the blood [80,81]. Interestingly, and given that lipid-lowering drugs reduce the incidence of severe cardiovascular events [62,82], the sole treatment of dyslipidaemia does not prevent atherogenesis [83,84], underscoring the need for additional therapies.

3.2. Anti-Inflammatory Agents

Chronic low-grade systemic inflammation aggravates atherogenesis [27,28], suggesting that anti-inflammatory agents may be beneficial in atherosclerosis treatment. Inflammatory signalling is involved in atherogenic processes (e.g., EC activation [85,86], inflammatory cell invasion [86,87], foam cell formation [88,89], senescence [90] and VSMC migration and proliferation [91,92]), and the identification of druggable anti-inflammatory targets is the subject of intense research in cardiovascular medicine. Monoclonal antibodies raised against inflammatory cytokines (e.g., canakinumab that targets IL-1β) reduce inflammatory signalling in multiple cell types and may therefore have a broad anti-atherogenic effect [64]. Indeed, atherosclerosis patients experimentally treated with canakinumab have a lowered risk for future severe cardiovascular outcomes [65]. Agents impacting alternative inflammatory pathways include the targeting of leukotrienes (e.g., atreleuton that targets 5-lipoxygenase [67]), chemokines (e.g., C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)-C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) inhibitors [71]), and adhesion molecules (e.g., inclacumab that targets P-selectin [66]), which all aim to mitigate inflammatory cell recruitment into the atherosclerotic plaque [93,94,95]. Finally, phospholipase A inhibitors (e.g., darapladib that targets lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 [69]) mitigate the formation of pro-atherogenic lipid moieties that attract inflammatory cells and cause foam cell differentiation.

3.3. Anti-Thrombotic Agents

Atherothrombosis occurs when an atherosclerotic plaque ruptures, and is the main cause of atherosclerosis-associated mortality [96]. The healthy quiescent endothelium produces a variety of anti-thrombogenic actors, including prostacyclin [97], anti-thrombin [98], thrombomodulin [99], and NO [100]. Yet, following plaque rupture, the damaged endothelium cannot maintain haemostasis and thrombogenesis initiates. Hence, anti-aggregants (i.e., agents that mitigate platelet aggregation) and anticoagulants (i.e., agents that inhibit blood clotting) are commonly prescribed as prophylaxis for cardiovascular events at late stages of atherosclerosis [101].
To summarize, current clinical and experimental antiatherogenic therapies are symptomatic and target hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and inflammation. Even though the endothelium may represent an efficacious cellular target for antiatherogenic therapies and endothelial damage is present throughout atherogenesis, remarkably, no therapies are in development that focus specifically on resolving endothelial damage to stop or even revert atherosclerosis progression. In the following section, we discuss the benefits of endothelial-specific antiatherogenic therapies, with a focus on epigenetic interventions, as these may broadly affect endothelial behaviour and may reverse dysfunction originating from multiple mechanisms.

4. The Endothelial Transcriptome as a Target for Anti-Atherogenic Therapy

In atherogenesis, endothelial damage occurs as a consequence of transcriptional changes in response to atherogenic stimuli [102,103], and the responsiveness of the endothelium to these stimuli determines the genetic atherosclerosis susceptibility in mice [31,104]. Moreover, the endothelial transcriptome differs between atheroprotective and atheroprone areas of the same vessel [105,106].
Determinants of the endothelial transcriptome are multiple, including the presence and activity of transcription factors (TFs), epigenetic regulation of the accessibility of the DNA to TFs, ribosomal activity, and post-transcriptional regulation via non-coding RNAs. The adaptation of a proatherogenic transcriptome by ECs may thus be the consequence of any of these factors alone or in combination, and implies that their therapeutic targeting may provide therapeutic benefit. As a single epigenetic enzyme may affect the endothelial transcriptome more broadly than any other singular factor, in the following section, we discuss the potential of small molecule agonists and antagonists of such enzymes to “normalize” the endothelial transcriptome to mitigate atherogenesis.

4.1. Epigenetic Regulation of the Endothelial Pro-Atherogenic Phenotype

Epigenetics refers to heritable phenotypical changes that do not involve changes in the genome, and include DNA and histone modifications [107]. Core histone proteins contain a globular domain and an amino terminal tail which can be modified by—amongst others—acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and sumoylation [108], that modify gene expression by modifying chromatin structure and regulating the accessibility of the chromatin to TFs.
Research into epigenetic changes during atherogenesis is in its infancy, yet pioneering studies are now being reported. In early atherogenesis, genome-wide acetylation of lysine (K) 9 from histone (H) 3 and H3K27 is increased, whereas methylation (Me) of H3K4 and H3K9 is observed during late atherogenesis [109]. Interestingly, H3K27Me3 is decreased in VSMCs [109] and increased in ECs during atherogenesis [110], suggesting cell type-specific epigenetic regulation within a similar extracellular milieu. Nonetheless, increased expression of enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2)—the epigenetic enzyme that places the trimethylation mark on H3K27—promotes atherogenesis in mice [111].
Endothelial cell damage and dysfunction is similarly affected by epigenetic modifications; the histone deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) mitigates hyperglycaemia-induced EC dysfunction [112], the methyltransferase SUV39H1 mitigates endothelial oxidative stress [113], and endothelial inflammatory activation can be abrogated by blunting the expression of the methyltransferase Set7 [114]. So far, two epigenetic enzymes, namely the histone methyltransferase EZH2 and the histone deacetylase SIRT1, have been convincingly described to affect endothelial cell function at multiple levels (Table 2), and it is tempting to speculate that the therapeutic targeting of these epigenetic enzymes may limit the development or progression of atherogenesis. In the following section, we discuss how these two epigenetic enzymes affect endothelial cell functions and how their therapeutic targeting changes the outcome of atherogenesis.

4.2. Endothelial Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 2 (EZH2)

Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) is a methyltransferase that trimethylates lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27Me3) and affects many endothelial cell functions [115,116]. As methyltransferase, EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) that silences gene expression through chromatin compaction [117] thereby making the DNA inaccessible for the transcription machinery [118].
In the context of atherosclerosis, hyperhomocysteinemia—a well-recognized risk factor for atherogenesis [143]—associates with elevated H3K27Me3 abundance, decreased NO production, EC apoptosis and an increase in lesion fat accumulation and lesion size [144,145,146,147]. Likewise, LDL-C induces endothelial EZH2 expression and mitigates KLF2-dependent NO production, resulting in vasoconstriction and the decreased expression of anti-atherogenic factors thrombomodulin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [119]. Moreover, in areas with OSS, ECs have increased H3K27Me3 abundance [110,116] and via the downregulation of ERK5 and consequently KLF2 and KLF4, two transcription factors that drive the expression of atheroprotective genes, this associates with a highly pro-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic and procoagulant endothelial [115,148,149,150,151]. Expectedly, RNAi-mediated silencing of EZH2 in the endothelium decreased pro-inflammatory gene expression, and thus reduces inflammatory cell recruitment, foam cell formation and atherogenesis [110]. An example of the beneficial effects of EZH2 silencing comes from the field of oncology. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition, a process similar to EndMT, is involved in several types of cancer and is promoted by EZH2 via the upregulation of the transcription factor Snail [152,153,154]. Therefore, pharmacological targeting of EZH2 inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition [155]. In the context of atherosclerosis where EndMT is also associated with an upregulation of Snail, this indicates that the repression of EZH2 could reduce EndMT and therefore, contributes to the healthy endothelium.
The molecular mechanisms by which EZH2 may affect endothelial-dependent atherogenesis are gaining attention. The independent atherosclerosis risk factors dyslipidaemia [130], hyperhomocysteinemia, [144] hyperglycaemia [156] and OSS [110] all block the expression of endothelial microRNAs that repress EZH2 translation under physiological conditions. For example, in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) treated with oxLDL, miR-200a expression is decreased, causing an upregulation of EZH2 [130]. During hyperhomocysteinemia, levels of EZH2 are increased as a result of reduced levels of miR-92a [144] and upon OSS, miR-101 expression is downregulated [110,157] also leading to an increased expression of endothelial EZH2 and the concurrent H3K27Me3 [130,144,156]. Interestingly, in the field of oncology, multiple other microRNAs such as miR-26a, miR-124 and miR-214 have been described to repress EZH2 expression [158,159]. This could imply a role for these microRNAs in the field of atherogenesis.
Next, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) guide EZH2 towards target genes [120], where critical endothelial genes are silenced. This orchestrated mechanism ultimately culminates in endothelial inflammatory activation, dysfunction and cell death [120,130,144,156].

4.3. Endothelial NAD+-Dependent Deacetylase Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1)

Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is a NAD+-dependent deacetylase that removes acetyl groups from histone tails with limited selectivity. SIRT1 facilitates gene silencing by the removal of acetyl groups from activating histone marks, including H1K26Ac, H3K9Ac, and H4K16Ac [160]. Interestingly, the loss of SIRT1 activity aggravates atherogenesis in ApoE−/− mice and the pharmacological activation of SIRT1 decreases atherosclerotic plaque size [161].
In the context of atherogenesis, the endothelial cell-specific overexpression of SIRT1 blunts atherogenesis in hypercholesteraemic ApoE−/− mice [128]. SIRT1 decreases the endothelial reactivity to oxLDL [122,124,125], potentially by limiting its cellular uptake [121]. Furthermore, SIRT1 increases the endothelial production of NO by increasing the expression and the activity of the NO producing enzyme eNOS [122,127,162]. As discussed above, the bioavailability of NO may influence atherogenesis at multiple levels [163].
SIRT1 also inhibits the inflammatory activation of endothelial cells via several distinct mechanisms. First, SIRT1 can deacetylate the p65 subunit of the inflammatory transcription factor Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NFκB), resulting in its deactivation [123,164], and thus blunting the endothelial inflammatory response [131]. Second, SIRT1 decreases inflammatory activation by inhibiting the p66shc–ROS–NFκB axis. P66shc is an oxLDL-sensitive gene that activates membrane bound NADPH oxidases (Nox) in ECs and deactivates ROS detoxifying enzymes, culminating in superoxide stress [165]. SIRT1 reduces p66shc expression by the deacetylation of histone 3 in its promoter region [112], resulting in the suppression of Nox-dependent [122,125] and mitochondrial [124] superoxide production. Third, SIRT1 reduces the formation of NLRP3 inflammasomes and the concurrent secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines through a non-elucidated mechanism [121]. Fourth, SIRT1 precludes oxidative DNA damage and the concurrent induction of endothelial cell senescence [133], through a mechanism that involves the deacetylation of the p53 transcription factor [134]. Thus, these data collectively attribute that SIRT1 averts endothelial inflammatory activation and senescence and may thereby attenuate atherogenesis.
Next to its role in maintaining endothelial function and precluding endothelial inflammatory activation, SIRT1 may also attenuate the endothelial contribution to neointima formation by regulating EndMT. Albeit the mechanism by which SIRT1 blocks EndMT is incompletely understood: SIRT1 blunts TGFβ signalling and EndMT through the inhibition of SMAD2/3 nuclear translocation and the deacetylation of SMAD4 [137,138]. Besides limiting the EndMT-derived neointimal cell number, SIRT1 also inhibits the production of an endothelial fibrogenic secretome, which may attenuate VSMC proliferation in the neointima [139].
Last, SIRT1 modulates endothelial anti-thrombogenicity [141]. SIRT1 deacetylates H4K16 in the PAI-1 promoter [141], which precludes its expression under atherogenic stress [132,136,140]. Furthermore, SIRT1 activation maintains thrombomodulin activity [142], suggesting SIRT1 evokes thrombolysis in ECs and may prevent clotting during atherogenesis.

4.4. EZH2 and SIRT1: the Yin and Yang of Early Atherogenesis

As discussed above, both EZH2 antagonism as well as SIRT1 agonism, have promising endothelial cell-mediated antiatherogenic effects (Figure 3). However, it should be noted here, that EZH2 inhibition and SIRT1 activation also have anti-atherogenic effects that are endothelial cell independent. For instance, inhibition of EZH2 as a result of GAS5 knockdown, a lncRNA that directly interacts with EZH2, promotes ABCA1-dependent hepatic LDL-C clearance [166]. Also, EZH2 inhibition mitigates foam cell oxLDL uptake in ApoE−/− mice [121]. Similarly, SIRT1 activation limits hepatic LDL-C production [161] and reduces foam cell formation [167] in atherosclerotic mice. Nonetheless, the endothelial-derived beneficial effects evoked by these interventions may greatly attenuate the atherogenic process.
Interestingly, and notwithstanding the individual atheroprotective effects evoked by EZH2 inhibition or SIRT1 activation alone (Table 2), target genes for EZH2 and SIRT1 overlap [168], suggesting an interconnection between the effects these epigenetic enzymes evoke during atherogenesis, which might suggest therapeutic synergy when interventions at the level of EZH2 and SIRT1 are combined. By targeting an epigenetic effector to a given gene, using epigenetic editing may be uniquely suited to unravel such seemingly interconnected mechanisms. Interestingly, as gene expression changes can be epigenetically induced in a sustained manner [169,170], this approach may also bear therapeutic opportunities.

5. Future Clinical Perspective

From the previous, it becomes visible that the pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 and activation of SIRT1 may be promising anti-atherogenic targets by mitigating endothelial dysfunction. The discovery of “epigenetic drugs” (i.e., small molecules that target epigenetic enzymes) is a field of active research, and new therapeutics are entering the clinic [171]. These currently available “epigenetic drugs” affect the epigenome genome-wide and may not show full selectivity, which may evoke unwanted side-effects. Yet, if a gene-specific causal epigenetic modification in known, epigenetic editing, i.e., the targeted modification of a specific epigenetic mark, may offer new solutions [172]. Exciting developments in this field show that gene expression can be specifically and sustainably induced through the epigenetic editing of DNA methylation [170] and histone modifications [169].
Epigenetic drugs that antagonize EZH2 and agonize SIRT1 activity are already clinically available or in development [171], albeit for indications other than atherosclerosis (Table 3). The efficacy of the EZH2 antagonist tazemetostat is currently being assessed in oncology, implying that this antagonist is safe for human use. The safety profile of EZH2 antagonists GSK2816126 and SHR2554 is currently assessed in phase I trials. In the experimental setting, tazemetostat decreases endothelial inflammatory signalling [129], but cardiovascular data on GSK2816126 and SHR2554 are lacking. As cancer development and atherogenesis seem to share an overlapping epidemiology and have a high co-occurrence [173], the inclusion of cardiovascular secondary endpoints in these clinical studies would facilitate a fast assessment of the antiatherogenic potential of EZH2 antagonists.
SIRT1 agonists have received more clinical attention in the cardiovascular field, and several SIRT1 agonists—including resveratrol, quercetin, and SRT2104—are currently being examined in clinical studies (Table 3). In the experimental setting, resveratrol precludes vascular inflammation and attenuates atherogenesis [162,174,175]. Quercetin mitigates endothelial cell activation, inflammation, VSMC proliferation, and lowers LDL-C uptake [176,177,178,179]. SRT2104 (also known as SRT3025) reduces endothelial oxidative stress and senescence, and mitigates atherogenesis via increased LDL-C excretion [135,161,180]. Clinically, resveratrol, quercetin and SRT2104 all improve the serum lipid profile [181,182,183], which supports further development as an anti-atherogenic drug.
Thus, compounds directed at normalizing EZH2 and SIRT1 activity can promote endothelial homeostasis, and thereby limit atherogenesis. Compounds under development for alternative indications can readily serve to explore the clinical potential for vascular health. To test the effect on atherogenesis, non-invasive cardiac endpoints, such as carotid Doppler ultrasound, might be employed in ongoing trials, allowing the early assessment of therapeutic potential in the cardiovascular field. If promising, add-on studies can be performed in patients suffering from atherosclerosis. Interestingly SIRT1 activity in circulating mononuclear cells is associated with atherosclerosis risk [184] and may serve as an accessible biomarker for patient inclusion in such studies.

6. Conclusions

Cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of death worldwide, and atherosclerosis is the leading pathology. Endothelial inflammatory activation and dysfunction are critical components in the development and progression of atherosclerosis by contributing to fatty streak formation, vascular inflammation, and neointima formation. Remarkably, current anti-atherogenic therapies do not include interventions at the endothelial level. We argue that endothelial cell EZH2 and SIRT-1 are involved in the regulation of endothelial homeostasis and their dysregulation contributes majorly to atherogenesis. Validation of driver genes and the clinical development of the epigenetic editing platforms would open future innovative avenues to prevent or treat atherosclerosis. Currently, compounds that antagonize EZH2 or agonize SIRT1 are clinically available or in development and warrant the inclusion of cardiovascular endpoints in the respective ongoing clinical studies. Insights into the effects of epigenetic drugs will indicate the role of epigenetics and facilitate the establishment of epigenetic therapies as anti-atherogenic medicaments.

Author Contributions

J.F. and B.V. acquired and analysed the literature files. J.F. and B.V. wrote the draft manuscript. M.G.R. and G.K. interpreted the data and substantially revised the manuscript. G.K. managed the process. All authors approve of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for their contribution. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, grant number 917.16.446 to G.K. The APC were waived by MDPI.

Acknowledgments

B.V. is supported by the State Training Foundation Scholarship from the Ministry of Education and Science of Mongolia (grant #621). G.K. is supported by an innovational research incentive grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, grant #917.16.446).

Conflicts of Interest

M.G.R. serves as scientific advisor to Sangamo Therapeutics, and G.K. holds an appointment as Chief Scientific Officer at Sulfateq. Sangamo and Sulfateq had no influence on the preparation of the current work. J.F. and B.V. report no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Soliman, G.A. Dietary Fiber, Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rafieian-Kopaei, M.; Setorki, M.; Doudi, M.; Baradaran, A.; Nasri, H. Atherosclerosis: Process, indicators, risk factors and new hopes. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 5, 927–946. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Lutgens, E.; van Suylen, R.J.; Faber, B.C.; Gijbels, M.J.; Eurlings, P.M.; Bijnens, A.P.; Cleutjens, K.B.; Heeneman, S.; Daemen, M.J. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture: Local or systemic process? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 2123–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmadi, A.; Argulian, E.; Leipsic, J.; Newby, D.E.; Narula, J. From Subclinical Atherosclerosis to Plaque Progression and Acute Coronary Events: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 1608–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gutstein, D.E.; Fuster, V. Pathophysiology and clinical significance of atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 41, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aird, W.C. Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: I. Structure, function, and mechanisms. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 158–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davignon, J.; Ganz, P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004, 109, III27–III32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Deanfield, J.E.; Halcox, J.P.; Rabelink, T.J. Endothelial function and dysfunction: Testing and clinical relevance. Circulation 2007, 115, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gimbrone, M.A., Jr. Vascular endothelium: An integrator of pathophysiologic stimuli in atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1995, 75, 67B–70B. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Souilhol, C.; Harmsen, M.C.; Evans, P.C.; Krenning, G. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nithianandarajah-Jones, G.N.; Wilm, B.; Goldring, C.E.; Muller, J.; Cross, M.J. The role of ERK5 in endothelial cell function. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 1584–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Le, N.T.; Heo, K.S.; Takei, Y.; Lee, H.; Woo, C.H.; Chang, E.; McClain, C.; Hurley, C.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; et al. A crucial role for p90RSK-mediated reduction of ERK5 transcriptional activity in endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2013, 127, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Moonen, J.R.; Lee, E.S.; Schmidt, M.; Maleszewska, M.; Koerts, J.A.; Brouwer, L.A.; van Kooten, T.G.; van Luyn, M.J.; Zeebregts, C.J.; Krenning, G.; et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to fibro-proliferative vascular disease and is modulated by fluid shear stress. Cardiovasc. Res. 2015, 108, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, M.; Chen, X.; Ma, J.; Hassan, W.; Wu, H.; Ling, J.; Shang, J. beta-Elemene attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice via restoring NO levels and alleviating oxidative stress. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 95, 1789–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Song, D.; Fang, G.; Mao, S.Z.; Ye, X.; Liu, G.; Miller, E.J.; Greenberg, H.; Liu, S.F. Selective inhibition of endothelial NF-kappaB signaling attenuates chronic intermittent hypoxia-induced atherosclerosis in mice. Atherosclerosis 2018, 270, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, P.Y.; Qin, L.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Dahlman, J.E.; Malagon-Lopez, J.; Gujja, S.; Cilfone, N.A.; Kauffman, K.J.; Sun, L.; et al. Endothelial TGF-beta signalling drives vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Nat. Metab. 2019, 1, 912–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Virani, S.S.; Smith, S.C., Jr.; Stone, N.J.; Grundy, S.M. Secondary Prevention for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Comparing Recent US and European Guidelines on Dyslipidemia. Circulation 2020, 141, 1121–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Al Suwaidi, J.; Hamasaki, S.; Higano, S.T.; Nishimura, R.A.; Holmes, D.R.; Lerman, A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation 2000, 101, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wallez, Y.; Huber, P. Endothelial adherens and tight junctions in vascular homeostasis, inflammation and angiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1778, 794–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Boullier, A.; Bird, D.A.; Chang, M.K.; Dennis, E.A.; Friedman, P.; Gillotre-Taylor, K.; Horkko, S.; Palinski, W.; Quehenberger, O.; Shaw, P.; et al. Scavenger receptors, oxidized LDL, and atherosclerosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 947, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Itabe, H. Oxidative modification of LDL: Its pathological role in atherosclerosis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2009, 37, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dimmeler, S.; Fleming, I.; Fisslthaler, B.; Hermann, C.; Busse, R.; Zeiher, A.M. Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature 1999, 399, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Corson, M.A.; James, N.L.; Latta, S.E.; Nerem, R.M.; Berk, B.C.; Harrison, D.G. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to fluid shear stress. Circ. Res. 1996, 79, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oemar, B.S.; Tschudi, M.R.; Godoy, N.; Brovkovich, V.; Malinski, T.; Luscher, T.F. Reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and production in human atherosclerosis. Circulation 1998, 97, 2494–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ryoo, S.; Lemmon, C.A.; Soucy, K.G.; Gupta, G.; White, A.R.; Nyhan, D.; Shoukas, A.; Romer, L.H.; Berkowitz, D.E. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein-dependent endothelial arginase II activation contributes to impaired nitric oxide signaling. Circ. Res. 2006, 99, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Celermajer, D.S.; Sorensen, K.E.; Gooch, V.M.; Spiegelhalter, D.J.; Miller, O.I.; Sullivan, I.D.; Lloyd, J.K.; Deanfield, J.E. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet 1992, 340, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Hansson, G.K. Leducq Transatlantic Network on Atherothrombosis. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: From pathophysiology to practice. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 2129–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Maseri, A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002, 105, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Takei, A.; Huang, Y.; Lopes-Virella, M.F. Expression of adhesion molecules by human endothelial cells exposed to oxidized low density lipoprotein. Influences of degree of oxidation and location of oxidized LDL. Atherosclerosis 2001, 154, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amberger, A.; Maczek, C.; Jurgens, G.; Michaelis, D.; Schett, G.; Trieb, K.; Eberl, T.; Jindal, S.; Xu, Q.; Wick, G. Co-expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, ELAM-1 and Hsp60 in human arterial and venous endothelial cells in response to cytokines and oxidized low-density lipoproteins. Cell Stress Chaperones 1997, 2, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shi, W.; Haberland, M.E.; Jien, M.L.; Shih, D.M.; Lusis, A.J. Endothelial responses to oxidized lipoproteins determine genetic susceptibility to atherosclerosis in mice. Circulation 2000, 102, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cybulsky, M.I.; Iiyama, K.; Li, H.; Zhu, S.; Chen, M.; Iiyama, M.; Davis, V.; Gutierrez-Ramos, J.C.; Connelly, P.W.; Milstone, D.S. A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in early atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Dansky, H.M.; Barlow, C.B.; Lominska, C.; Sikes, J.L.; Kao, C.; Weinsaft, J.; Cybulsky, M.I.; Smith, J.D. Adhesion of monocytes to arterial endothelium and initiation of atherosclerosis are critically dependent on vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 gene dosage. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2001, 21, 1662–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kleemann, R.; Zadelaar, S.; Kooistra, T. Cytokines and atherosclerosis: A comprehensive review of studies in mice. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 79, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bobryshev, Y.V. Monocyte recruitment and foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. Micron 2006, 37, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lusis, A.J. Atherosclerosis. Nature 2000, 407, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Campisi, J.; d’Adda di Fagagna, F. Cellular senescence: When bad things happen to good cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 729–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stojanovic, S.D.; Fiedler, J.; Bauersachs, J.; Thum, T.; Sedding, D.G. Senescence-induced inflammation: An important player and key therapeutic target in atherosclerosis. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 2983–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Minamino, T.; Miyauchi, H.; Yoshida, T.; Ishida, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Komuro, I. Endothelial cell senescence in human atherosclerosis: Role of telomere in endothelial dysfunction. Circulation 2002, 105, 1541–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Erusalimsky, J.D. Vascular endothelial senescence: From mechanisms to pathophysiology. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Scott-Burden, T.; Vanhoutte, P.M. Regulation of smooth muscle cell growth by endothelium-derived factors. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 1994, 21, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  42. Krenning, G.; Barauna, V.G.; Krieger, J.E.; Harmsen, M.C.; Moonen, J.R. Endothelial Plasticity: Shifting Phenotypes through Force Feedback. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 9762959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kovacic, J.C.; Dimmeler, S.; Harvey, R.P.; Finkel, T.; Aikawa, E.; Krenning, G.; Baker, A.H. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 190–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wesseling, M.; Sakkers, T.R.; de Jager, S.C.A.; Pasterkamp, G.; Goumans, M.J. The morphological and molecular mechanisms of epithelial/endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and its involvement in atherosclerosis. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2018, 106, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mahmoud, M.M.; Kim, H.R.; Xing, R.; Hsiao, S.; Mammoto, A.; Chen, J.; Serbanovic-Canic, J.; Feng, S.; Bowden, N.P.; Maguire, R.; et al. TWIST1 Integrates Endothelial Responses to Flow in Vascular Dysfunction and Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Evrard, S.M.; Lecce, L.; Michelis, K.C.; Nomura-Kitabayashi, A.; Pandey, G.; Purushothaman, K.R.; d’Escamard, V.; Li, J.R.; Hadri, L.; Fujitani, K.; et al. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition is common in atherosclerotic lesions and is associated with plaque instability. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Helmke, A.; Casper, J.; Nordlohne, J.; David, S.; Haller, H.; Zeisberg, E.M.; von Vietinghoff, S. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition shapes the atherosclerotic plaque and modulates macrophage function. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2019, 33, 2278–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Clarke, M.C.; Figg, N.; Maguire, J.J.; Davenport, A.P.; Goddard, M.; Littlewood, T.D.; Bennett, M.R. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induces features of plaque vulnerability in atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shah, P.K.; Falk, E.; Badimon, J.J.; Fernandez-Ortiz, A.; Mailhac, A.; Villareal-Levy, G.; Fallon, J.T.; Regnstrom, J.; Fuster, V. Human monocyte-derived macrophages induce collagen breakdown in fibrous caps of atherosclerotic plaques. Potential role of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases and implications for plaque rupture. Circulation 1995, 92, 1565–1569. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Vendrov, A.E.; Stevenson, M.D.; Alahari, S.; Pan, H.; Wickline, S.A.; Madamanchi, N.R.; Runge, M.S. Attenuated Superoxide Dismutase 2 Activity Induces Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability During Aging in Hyperlipidemic Mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Zhu, H.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Wang, C.; Cao, Q.; Fan, F.; Zhao, J.; Liu, X.; Yuan, M.; Sun, X.; et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 deficiency promotes atherosclerotic plaque instability through accelerating mitochondrial ROS-mediated vascular smooth muscle cell senescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 1782–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gordon, D.; Reidy, M.A.; Benditt, E.P.; Schwartz, S.M. Cell proliferation in human coronary arteries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 4600–4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. O’Brien, E.R.; Alpers, C.E.; Stewart, D.K.; Ferguson, M.; Tran, N.; Gordon, D.; Benditt, E.P.; Hinohara, T.; Simpson, J.B.; Schwartz, S.M. Proliferation in primary and restenotic coronary atherectomy tissue. Implications for antiproliferative therapy. Circ. Res. 1993, 73, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, J.; Uryga, A.K.; Reinhold, J.; Figg, N.; Baker, L.; Finigan, A.; Gray, K.; Kumar, S.; Clarke, M.; Bennett, M. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Senescence Promotes Atherosclerosis and Features of Plaque Vulnerability. Circulation 2015, 132, 1909–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Susic, D. Hypertension, aging, and atherosclerosis. The endothelial interface. Med. Clin. N. Am. 1997, 81, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. James, P.A.; Oparil, S.; Carter, B.L.; Cushman, W.C.; Dennison-Himmelfarb, C.; Handler, J.; Lackland, D.T.; LeFevre, M.L.; MacKenzie, T.D.; Ogedegbe, O.; et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: Report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 2014, 311, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Olafiranye, O.; Zizi, F.; Brimah, P.; Jean-Louis, G.; Makaryus, A.N.; McFarlane, S.; Ogedegbe, G. Management of Hypertension among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Int. J. Hypertens. 2011, 2011, 653903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Riccioni, G.; Sblendorio, V. Atherosclerosis: From biology to pharmacological treatment. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. JGC 2012, 9, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Laurent, S. Antihypertensive drugs. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 124, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Piepoli, M.F.; Hoes, A.W.; Agewall, S.; Albus, C.; Brotons, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Cooney, M.T.; Corrà, U.; Cosyns, B.; Deaton, C.; et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2315–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dézsi, C.A. The Different Therapeutic Choices with ARBs. Which One to Give? When? Why? Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2016, 16, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Mach, F.; Baigent, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Koskinas, K.C.; Casula, M.; Badimon, L.; Chapman, M.J.; De Backer, G.G.; Delgado, V.; Ference, B.A.; et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 111–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arnett, D.K.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Albert, M.A.; Buroker, A.B.; Goldberger, Z.D.; Hahn, E.J.; Himmelfarb, C.D.; Khera, A.; Lloyd-Jones, D.; McEvoy, J.W.; et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019, 140, e596–e646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ridker, P.M.; Howard, C.P.; Walter, V.; Everett, B.; Libby, P.; Hensen, J.; Thuren, T. Effects of interleukin-1β inhibition with canakinumab on hemoglobin A1c, lipids, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and fibrinogen: A phase IIb randomized placebo controlled trial. Circulation 2012, 126, 2739–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Thuren, T.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Chang, W.H.; Ballantyne, C.; Fonseca, F.; Nicolau, J.; Koenig, W.; Anker, S.D.; et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schmitt, C.; Abt, M.; Ciorciaro, C.; Kling, D.; Jamois, C.; Schick, E.; Solier, C.; Benghozi, R.; Gaudreault, J. First-in-Man Study With Inclacumab, a Human Monoclonal Antibody Against P-selectin. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2015, 65, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Matsumoto, S.; Ibrahim, R.; Gregoire, J.C.; L’Allier, P.L.; Pressacco, J.; Tardif, J.C.; Budoff, M.J. Effect of treatment with 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor VIA-2291 (atreleuton) on coronary plaque progression: A serial CT angiography study. Clin. Cardiol. 2017, 40, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Back, M. Inhibitors of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway in atherosclerosis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 3116–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Serruys, P.W.; Garcia-Garcia, H.M.; Buszman, P.; Erne, P.; Verheye, S.; Aschermann, M.; Duckers, H.; Bleie, O.; Dudek, D.; Botker, H.E.; et al. Effects of the direct lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) inhibitor darapladib on human coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation 2008, 118, 1172–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Leite, J.O.; Vaishnav, U.; Puglisi, M.; Fraser, H.; Trias, J.; Fernandez, M.L. A-002 (Varespladib), a phospholipase A2 inhibitor, reduces atherosclerosis in guinea pigs. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2009, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Winter, C.; Silvestre-Roig, C.; Ortega-Gomez, A.; Lemnitzer, P.; Poelman, H.; Schumski, A.; Winter, J.; Drechsler, M.; de Jong, R.; Immler, R.; et al. Chrono-pharmacological Targeting of the CCL2-CCR2 Axis Ameliorates Atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 175–182.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Gallone, G.; Baldetti, L.; Pagnesi, M.; Latib, A.; Colombo, A.; Libby, P.; Giannini, F. Medical Therapy for Long-Term Prevention of Atherothrombosis Following an Acute Coronary Syndrome: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2886–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Patrono, C.; Morais, J.; Baigent, C.; Collet, J.P.; Fitzgerald, D.; Halvorsen, S.; Rocca, B.; Siegbahn, A.; Storey, R.F.; Vilahur, G. Antiplatelet Agents for the Treatment and Prevention of Coronary Atherothrombosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 1760–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. European Association for Cardiovascular, Prevention, Rehabilitation; Reiner, Z.; Catapano, A.L.; De Backer, G.; Graham, I.; Taskinen, M.R.; Wiklund, O.; Agewall, S.; Alegria, E.; Chapman, M.J.; et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1769–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ference, B.A.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Graham, I.; Ray, K.K.; Packard, C.J.; Bruckert, E.; Hegele, R.A.; Krauss, R.M.; Raal, F.J.; Schunkert, H.; et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 2459–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Liao, J.K.; Laufs, U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 89–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Istvan, E.S.; Deisenhofer, J. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001, 292, 1160–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ridker, P.M. Residual inflammatory risk: Addressing the obverse side of the atherosclerosis prevention coin. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 1720–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ridker, P.M.; Rifai, N.; Clearfield, M.; Downs, J.R.; Weis, S.E.; Miles, J.S.; Gotto, A.M., Jr.; Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study Investigators. Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1959–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dadu, R.T.; Ballantyne, C.M. Lipid lowering with PCSK9 inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2014, 11, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Garcia-Calvo, M.; Lisnock, J.; Bull, H.G.; Hawes, B.E.; Burnett, D.A.; Braun, M.P.; Crona, J.H.; Davis, H.R., Jr.; Dean, D.C.; Detmers, P.A.; et al. The target of ezetimibe is Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8132–8137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Silverman, M.G.; Ference, B.A.; Im, K.; Wiviott, S.D.; Giugliano, R.P.; Grundy, S.M.; Braunwald, E.; Sabatine, M.S. Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2016, 316, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Moss, J.W.; Ramji, D.P. Nutraceutical therapies for atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016, 13, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tran-Dinh, A.; Diallo, D.; Delbosc, S.; Varela-Perez, L.M.; Dang, Q.B.; Lapergue, B.; Burillo, E.; Michel, J.B.; Levoye, A.; Martin-Ventura, J.L.; et al. HDL and endothelial protection. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 493–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kirii, H.; Niwa, T.; Yamada, Y.; Wada, H.; Saito, K.; Iwakura, Y.; Asano, M.; Moriwaki, H.; Seishima, M. Lack of interleukin-1beta decreases the severity of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Schuett, H.; Oestreich, R.; Waetzig, G.H.; Annema, W.; Luchtefeld, M.; Hillmer, A.; Bavendiek, U.; von Felden, J.; Divchev, D.; Kempf, T.; et al. Transsignaling of interleukin-6 crucially contributes to atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Zhang, X.; Niessner, A.; Nakajima, T.; Ma-Krupa, W.; Kopecky, S.L.; Frye, R.L.; Goronzy, J.J.; Weyand, C.M. Interleukin 12 induces T-cell recruitment into the atherosclerotic plaque. Circ. Res. 2006, 98, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Halvorsen, B.; Waehre, T.; Scholz, H.; Clausen, O.P.; von der Thusen, J.H.; Muller, F.; Heimli, H.; Tonstad, S.; Hall, C.; Froland, S.S.; et al. Interleukin-10 enhances the oxidized LDL-induced foam cell formation of macrophages by antiapoptotic mechanisms. J. Lipid Res. 2005, 46, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Fu, H.; Tang, Y.Y.; Ouyang, X.P.; Tang, S.L.; Su, H.; Li, X.; Huang, L.P.; He, M.; Lv, Y.C.; He, P.P.; et al. Interleukin-27 inhibits foam cell formation by promoting macrophage ABCA1 expression through JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 452, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sanada, F.; Muratsu, J.; Otsu, R.; Shimizu, H.; Koibuchi, N.; Uchida, K.; Taniyama, Y.; Yoshimura, S.; Rakugi, H.; Morishita, R. Local Production of Activated Factor X in Atherosclerotic Plaque Induced Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Senescence. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Jain, M.; Singh, A.; Singh, V.; Barthwal, M.K. Involvement of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal formation after rat carotid injury. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 1445–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Valente, A.J.; Yoshida, T.; Murthy, S.N.; Sakamuri, S.S.; Katsuyama, M.; Clark, R.A.; Delafontaine, P.; Chandrasekar, B. Angiotensin II enhances AT1-Nox1 binding and stimulates arterial smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation through AT1, Nox1, and interleukin-18. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 303, H282–H296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Charo, I.F.; Taub, R. Anti-inflammatory therapeutics for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Chistiakov, D.A.; Melnichenko, A.A.; Grechko, A.V.; Myasoedova, V.A.; Orekhov, A.N. Potential of anti-inflammatory agents for treatment of atherosclerosis. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2018, 104, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ridker, P.M.; Luscher, T.F. Anti-inflammatory therapies for cardiovascular disease. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 1782–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Meadows, T.A.; Bhatt, D.L. Clinical aspects of platelet inhibitors and thrombus formation. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1261–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Weksler, B.B.; Marcus, A.J.; Jaffe, E.A. Synthesis of prostaglandin I2 (prostacyclin) by cultured human and bovine endothelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 3922–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Chan, V.; Chan, T.K. Antithrombin III in fresh and cultured human endothelial cells: A natural anticoagulant from the vascular endothelium. Thromb. Res. 1979, 15, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wei, H.J.; Li, Y.H.; Shi, G.Y.; Liu, S.L.; Chang, P.C.; Kuo, C.H.; Wu, H.L. Thrombomodulin domains attenuate atherosclerosis by inhibiting thrombin-induced endothelial cell activation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 92, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Loscalzo, J. Nitric oxide insufficiency, platelet activation, and arterial thrombosis. Circ. Res. 2001, 88, 756–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Goldstein, L.B.; Adams, R.; Alberts, M.J.; Appel, L.J.; Brass, L.M.; Bushnell, C.D.; Culebras, A.; DeGraba, T.J.; Gorelick, P.B.; Guyton, J.R.; et al. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 2006, 113, e873–e923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Erbilgin, A.; Siemers, N.; Kayne, P.; Yang, W.P.; Berliner, J.; Lusis, A.J. Gene expression analyses of mouse aortic endothelium in response to atherogenic stimuli. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2509–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Deng, D.X.; Tsalenko, A.; Vailaya, A.; Ben-Dor, A.; Kundu, R.; Estay, I.; Tabibiazar, R.; Kincaid, R.; Yakhini, Z.; Bruhn, L.; et al. Differences in vascular bed disease susceptibility reflect differences in gene expression response to atherogenic stimuli. Circ. Res. 2006, 98, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liao, F.; Andalibi, A.; deBeer, F.C.; Fogelman, A.M.; Lusis, A.J. Genetic control of inflammatory gene induction and NF-kappa B-like transcription factor activation in response to an atherogenic diet in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 91, 2572–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Davies, P.F.; Civelek, M.; Fang, Y.; Fleming, I. The atherosusceptible endothelium: Endothelial phenotypes in complex haemodynamic shear stress regions in vivo. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013, 99, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Souilhol, C.; Serbanovic-Canic, J.; Fragiadaki, M.; Chico, T.J.; Ridger, V.; Roddie, H.; Evans, P.C. Endothelial responses to shear stress in atherosclerosis: A novel role for developmental genes. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Berger, S.L.; Kouzarides, T.; Shiekhattar, R.; Shilatifard, A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Greissel, A.; Culmes, M.; Burgkart, R.; Zimmermann, A.; Eckstein, H.H.; Zernecke, A.; Pelisek, J. Histone acetylation and methylation significantly change with severity of atherosclerosis in human carotid plaques. Cardiovasc. Pathol. Off. J. Soc. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2016, 25, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Xu, S.; Xu, Y.; Yin, M.; Zhang, S.; Liu, P.; Koroleva, M.; Si, S.; Little, P.J.; Pelisek, J.; Jin, Z.G. Flow-dependent epigenetic regulation of IGFBP5 expression by H3K27me3 contributes to endothelial anti-inflammatory effects. Theranostics 2018, 8, 3007–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lv, Y.C.; Tang, Y.Y.; Zhang, P.; Wan, W.; Yao, F.; He, P.P.; Xie, W.; Mo, Z.C.; Shi, J.F.; Wu, J.F.; et al. Histone Methyltransferase Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2-Mediated ABCA1 Promoter DNA Methylation Contributes to the Progression of Atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Zhou, S.; Chen, H.Z.; Wan, Y.Z.; Zhang, Q.J.; Wei, Y.S.; Huang, S.; Liu, J.J.; Lu, Y.B.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Yang, R.F.; et al. Repression of P66Shc expression by SIRT1 contributes to the prevention of hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Costantino, S.; Paneni, F.; Virdis, A.; Hussain, S.; Mohammed, S.A.; Capretti, G.; Akhmedov, A.; Dalgaard, K.; Chiandotto, S.; Pospisilik, J.A.; et al. Interplay among H3K9-editing enzymes SUV39H1, JMJD2C and SRC-1 drives p66Shc transcription and vascular oxidative stress in obesity. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Paneni, F.; Costantino, S.; Battista, R.; Castello, L.; Capretti, G.; Chiandotto, S.; Scavone, G.; Villano, A.; Pitocco, D.; Lanza, G.; et al. Adverse epigenetic signatures by histone methyltransferase Set7 contribute to vascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2015, 8, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Dreger, H.; Ludwig, A.; Weller, A.; Stangl, V.; Baumann, G.; Meiners, S.; Stangl, K. Epigenetic regulation of cell adhesion and communication by enhancer of zeste homolog 2 in human endothelial cells. Hypertension 2012, 60, 1176–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Maleszewska, M.; Vanchin, B.; Harmsen, M.C.; Krenning, G. The decrease in histone methyltransferase EZH2 in response to fluid shear stress alters endothelial gene expression and promotes quiescence. Angiogenesis 2016, 19, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Van Mierlo, G.; Veenstra, G.J.C.; Vermeulen, M.; Marks, H. The Complexity of PRC2 Subcomplexes. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Di Croce, L.; Helin, K. Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20, 1147–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Vikram, A.; Hoffman, T.A.; Naqvi, A.; Lewarchik, C.M.; Kim, Y.R.; Irani, K. Histone and DNA methylation-mediated epigenetic downregulation of endothelial Kruppel-like factor 2 by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 1936–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Lu, C. Long noncoding RNA OIP5-AS1 accelerates the ox-LDL mediated vascular endothelial cells apoptosis through targeting GSK-3beta via recruiting EZH2. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 1827–1834. [Google Scholar]
  121. Yang, M.; Lv, H.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Han, B.; Hou, S.; Liu, D.; et al. Colchicine Alleviates Cholesterol Crystal-Induced Endothelial Cell Pyroptosis through Activating AMPK/SIRT1 Pathway. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 9173530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hung, C.H.; Chan, S.H.; Chu, P.M.; Tsai, K.L. Quercetin is a potent anti-atherosclerotic compound by activation of SIRT1 signaling under oxLDL stimulation. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1905–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pan, W.; Yu, H.; Huang, S.; Zhu, P. Resveratrol Protects against TNF-alpha-Induced Injury in Human Umbilical Endothelial Cells through Promoting Sirtuin-1-Induced Repression of NF-KB and p38 MAPK. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Tsai, K.L.; Hung, C.H.; Chan, S.H.; Hsieh, P.L.; Ou, H.C.; Cheng, Y.H.; Chu, P.M. Chlorogenic Acid Protects Against oxLDL-Induced Oxidative Damage and Mitochondrial Dysfunction by Modulating SIRT1 in Endothelial Cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1700928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhao, D.; Sun, X.; Lv, S.; Sun, M.; Guo, H.; Zhai, Y.; Wang, Z.; Dai, P.; Zheng, L.; Ye, M.; et al. Salidroside attenuates oxidized lowdensity lipoproteininduced endothelial cell injury via promotion of the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 43, 2279–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Gracia-Sancho, J.; Villarreal, G., Jr.; Zhang, Y.; Garcia-Cardena, G. Activation of SIRT1 by resveratrol induces KLF2 expression conferring an endothelial vasoprotective phenotype. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 85, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Mattagajasingh, I.; Kim, C.S.; Naqvi, A.; Yamamori, T.; Hoffman, T.A.; Jung, S.B.; DeRicco, J.; Kasuno, K.; Irani, K. SIRT1 promotes endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation by activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 14855–14860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Zhang, Q.J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, H.Z.; Zhou, S.; Zheng, W.; Liu, G.; Wei, Y.S.; Cai, H.; Liu, D.P.; Liang, C.C. Endothelium-specific overexpression of class III deacetylase SIRT1 decreases atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 80, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Luo, Y.; Fang, Y.; Kang, R.; Lenahan, C.; Gamdzyk, M.; Zhang, Z.; Okada, T.; Tang, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, J.H. Inhibition of EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2) Attenuates Neuroinflammation via H3k27me3/SOCS3/TRAF6/NF-kappaB (Trimethylation of Histone 3 Lysine 27/Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3/Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Family 6/Nuclear Factor-kappaB) in a Rat Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke 2020, 51, 3320–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wang, J.; Li, P.; Xu, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, J. MicroRNA-200a Inhibits Inflammation and Atherosclerotic Lesion Formation by Disrupting EZH2-Mediated Methylation of STAT3. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Stein, S.; Schafer, N.; Breitenstein, A.; Besler, C.; Winnik, S.; Lohmann, C.; Heinrich, K.; Brokopp, C.E.; Handschin, C.; Landmesser, U.; et al. SIRT1 reduces endothelial activation without affecting vascular function in ApoE-/- mice. Aging 2010, 2, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Chen, H.; Wan, Y.; Zhou, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Chen, F.; Hao, D.; Zhao, X.; Guo, Z.; et al. Endothelium-specific SIRT1 overexpression inhibits hyperglycemia-induced upregulation of vascular cell senescence. Sci. China Life Sci. 2012, 55, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Kao, C.L.; Chen, L.K.; Chang, Y.L.; Yung, M.C.; Hsu, C.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Lo, W.L.; Chen, S.J.; Ku, H.H.; Hwang, S.J. Resveratrol protects human endothelium from H(2)O(2)-induced oxidative stress and senescence via SirT1 activation. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2010, 17, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Ota, H.; Akishita, M.; Eto, M.; Iijima, K.; Kaneki, M.; Ouchi, Y. Sirt1 modulates premature senescence-like phenotype in human endothelial cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2007, 43, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wu, H.; Wu, J.; Zhou, S.; Huang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Jia, Y. SRT2104 attenuates diabetes-induced aortic endothelial dysfunction via inhibition of P53. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 237, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yang, R.; Fang, W.; Liang, J.; Lin, C.; Wu, S.; Yan, S.; Hu, C.; Ke, X. Apelin/APJ axis improves angiotensin II-induced endothelial cell senescence through AMPK/SIRT1 signaling pathway. Arch. Med. Sci. AMS 2018, 14, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Li, Z.; Wang, F.; Zha, S.; Cao, Q.; Sheng, J.; Chen, S. SIRT1 inhibits TGF-beta-induced endothelial-mesenchymal transition in human endothelial cells with Smad4 deacetylation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 9007–9014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Fan, X.F.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Gong, Y.S.; Han, L.P. SIRT1 activation attenuates cardiac fibrosis by endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 118, 109227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lipphardt, M.; Dihazi, H.; Muller, G.A.; Goligorsky, M.S. Fibrogenic Secretome of Sirtuin 1-Deficient Endothelial Cells: Wnt, Notch and Glycocalyx Rheostat. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Ota, H.; Eto, M.; Kano, M.R.; Ogawa, S.; Iijima, K.; Akishita, M.; Ouchi, Y. Cilostazol inhibits oxidative stress-induced premature senescence via upregulation of Sirt1 in human endothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1634–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Wan, Y.Z.; Gao, P.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Hao, D.L.; Lian, L.S.; Li, Y.J.; Chen, H.Z.; Liu, D.P. SIRT1-mediated epigenetic downregulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 prevents vascular endothelial replicative senescence. Aging Cell 2014, 13, 890–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Wu, Z.; Liu, M.C.; Liang, M.; Fu, J. Sirt1 protects against thrombomodulin down-regulation and lung coagulation after particulate matter exposure. Blood 2012, 119, 2422–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Piazzolla, G.; Candigliota, M.; Fanelli, M.; Castrovilli, A.; Berardi, E.; Antonica, G.; Battaglia, S.; Solfrizzi, V.; Sabba, C.; Tortorella, C. Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor of atherosclerosis in patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2019, 11, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Xiaoling, Y.; Li, Z.; ShuQiang, L.; Shengchao, M.; Anning, Y.; Ning, D.; Nan, L.; Yuexia, J.; Xiaoming, Y.; Guizhong, L. Hyperhomocysteinemia in ApoE-/-mice leads to overexpression of enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 via miR-92a regulation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Gurda, D.; Handschuh, L.; Kotkowiak, W.; Jakubowski, H. Homocysteine thiolactone and N-homocysteinylated protein induce pro-atherogenic changes in gene expression in human vascular endothelial cells. Amino Acids 2015, 47, 1319–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Jakubowski, H.; Zhang, L.; Bardeguez, A.; Aviv, A. Homocysteine thiolactone and protein homocysteinylation in human endothelial cells: Implications for atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Vignini, A.; Nanetti, L.; Bacchetti, T.; Ferretti, G.; Curatola, G.; Mazzanti, L. Modification induced by homocysteine and low-density lipoprotein on human aortic endothelial cells: An in vitro study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 4558–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Brooks, A.R.; Lelkes, P.I.; Rubanyi, G.M. Gene expression profiling of human aortic endothelial cells exposed to disturbed flow and steady laminar flow. Physiol. Genom. 2002, 9, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Passerini, A.G.; Polacek, D.C.; Shi, C.; Francesco, N.M.; Manduchi, E.; Grant, G.R.; Pritchard, W.F.; Powell, S.; Chang, G.Y.; Stoeckert, C.J., Jr.; et al. Coexisting proinflammatory and antioxidative endothelial transcription profiles in a disturbed flow region of the adult porcine aorta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2482–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Lee, E.S.; Boldo, L.S.; Fernandez, B.O.; Feelisch, M.; Harmsen, M.C. Suppression of TAK1 pathway by shear stress counteracts the inflammatory endothelial cell phenotype induced by oxidative stress and TGF-β1. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Van Thienen, J.V.; Fledderus, J.O.; Dekker, R.J.; Rohlena, J.; van Ijzendoorn, G.A.; Kootstra, N.A.; Pannekoek, H.; Horrevoets, A.J. Shear stress sustains atheroprotective endothelial KLF2 expression more potently than statins through mRNA stabilization. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 72, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Cao, Q.; Yu, J.; Dhanasekaran, S.M.; Kim, J.H.; Mani, R.S.; Tomlins, S.A.; Mehra, R.; Laxman, B.; Cao, X.; Yu, J.; et al. Repression of E-cadherin by the polycomb group protein EZH2 in cancer. Oncogene 2008, 27, 7274–7284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Roche, J. The Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer. Cancers 2018, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Luo, H.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, S.; Chang, H.; Yi, C.; Cao, H.; Gao, Y.; Guo, H.; Hou, J.; Yan, J.; et al. EZH2 promotes invasion and metastasis of laryngeal squamous cells carcinoma via epithelial-mesenchymal transition through H3K27me3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 479, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zhao, M.; Hu, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, C.; Chen, J.; Ren, Y.; Kong, L.; Sun, S.; Zhang, L.; Jin, R.; et al. Targeting of EZH2 inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via regulating the STAT3/VEGFR2 axis. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Liao, X.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, X. Effects of miR1955p on cell proliferation and apoptosis in gestational diabetes mellitus via targeting EZH2. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Smits, M.; Mir, S.E.; Nilsson, R.J.; van der Stoop, P.M.; Niers, J.M.; Marquez, V.E.; Cloos, J.; Breakefield, X.O.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Noske, D.P.; et al. Down-regulation of miR-101 in endothelial cells promotes blood vessel formation through reduced repression of EZH2. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Italiano, A. Role of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase as a therapeutic target in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 165, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Vella, S.; Pomella, S.; Leoncini, P.P.; Colletti, M.; Conti, B.; Marquez, V.E.; Strillacci, A.; Roma, J.; Gallego, S.; Milano, G.M.; et al. MicroRNA-101 is repressed by EZH2 and its restoration inhibits tumorigenic features in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Clin. Epigenetics 2015, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Jing, H.; Lin, H. Sirtuins in epigenetic regulation. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2350–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Miranda, M.X.; van Tits, L.J.; Lohmann, C.; Arsiwala, T.; Winnik, S.; Tailleux, A.; Stein, S.; Gomes, A.P.; Suri, V.; Ellis, J.L.; et al. The Sirt1 activator SRT3025 provides atheroprotection in Apoe-/- mice by reducing hepatic Pcsk9 secretion and enhancing Ldlr expression. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Li, J.; Zhong, Z.; Yuan, J.; Chen, X.; Huang, Z.; Wu, Z. Resveratrol improves endothelial dysfunction and attenuates atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 67, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Bloch, K.D. The vascular biology of nitric oxide and its role in atherogenesis. Annu. Rev. Med. 1996, 47, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Kauppinen, A.; Suuronen, T.; Ojala, J.; Kaarniranta, K.; Salminen, A. Antagonistic crosstalk between NF-kappaB and SIRT1 in the regulation of inflammation and metabolic disorders. Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Galimov, E.R. The Role of p66shc in Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis. Acta Nat. 2010, 2, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Meng, X.D.; Yao, H.H.; Wang, L.M.; Yu, M.; Shi, S.; Yuan, Z.X.; Liu, J. Knockdown of GAS5 Inhibits Atherosclerosis Progression via Reducing EZH2-Mediated ABCA1 Transcription in ApoE(-/-) Mice. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 19, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Stein, S.; Lohmann, C.; Schafer, N.; Hofmann, J.; Rohrer, L.; Besler, C.; Rothgiesser, K.M.; Becher, B.; Hottiger, M.O.; Boren, J.; et al. SIRT1 decreases Lox-1-mediated foam cell formation in atherogenesis. Eur. Heart J. 2010, 31, 2301–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Wakeling, L.A.; Ions, L.J.; Escolme, S.M.; Cockell, S.J.; Su, T.; Dey, M.; Hampton, E.V.; Jenkins, G.; Wainwright, L.J.; McKay, J.A.; et al. SIRT1 affects DNA methylation of polycomb group protein target genes, a hotspot of the epigenetic shift observed in ageing. Hum. Genom. 2015, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Cano-Rodriguez, D.; Gjaltema, R.A.; Jilderda, L.J.; Jellema, P.; Dokter-Fokkens, J.; Ruiters, M.H.; Rots, M.G. Writing of H3K4Me3 overcomes epigenetic silencing in a sustained but context-dependent manner. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Xu, X.; Tan, X.; Tampe, B.; Wilhelmi, T.; Hulshoff, M.S.; Saito, S.; Moser, T.; Kalluri, R.; Hasenfuss, G.; Zeisberg, E.M.; et al. High-fidelity CRISPR/Cas9- based gene-specific hydroxymethylation rescues gene expression and attenuates renal fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Ganesan, A.; Arimondo, P.B.; Rots, M.G.; Jeronimo, C.; Berdasco, M. The timeline of epigenetic drug discovery: From reality to dreams. Clin. Epigenetics 2019, 11, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Cano-Rodriguez, D.; Rots, M.G. Epigenetic Editing: On the Verge of Reprogramming Gene Expression at Will. Curr. Genet. Med. Rep. 2016, 4, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Ross, J.S.; Stagliano, N.E.; Donovan, M.J.; Breitbart, R.E.; Ginsburg, G.S. Atherosclerosis and Cancer. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 947, 271–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xu, L.; Wang, R.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Mang, J.; Xu, Z. Resveratrol Treatment Is Associated with Lipid Regulation and Inhibition of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) in Rabbits Fed a High-Fat Diet. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. eCAM 2020, 2020, 9641582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zhou, L.; Long, J.; Sun, Y.; Chen, W.; Qiu, R.; Yuan, D. Resveratrol ameliorates atherosclerosis induced by high-fat diet and LPS in ApoE(-/-) mice and inhibits the activation of CD4(+) T cells. Nutr. Metab. 2020, 17, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Bhaskar, S.; Kumar, K.S.; Krishnan, K.; Antony, H. Quercetin alleviates hypercholesterolemic diet induced inflammation during progression and regression of atherosclerosis in rabbits. Nutrition 2013, 29, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Cao, H.; Jia, Q.; Shen, D.; Yan, L.; Chen, C.; Xing, S. Quercetin has a protective effect on atherosclerosis via enhancement of autophagy in ApoE(-/-) mice. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 2451–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Kleemann, R.; Verschuren, L.; Morrison, M.; Zadelaar, S.; van Erk, M.J.; Wielinga, P.Y.; Kooistra, T. Anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative and anti-atherosclerotic effects of quercetin in human in vitro and in vivo models. Atherosclerosis 2011, 218, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Nie, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, G.; Du, X. Quercetin reduces atherosclerotic lesions by altering the gut microbiota and reducing atherogenic lipid metabolites. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1824–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Chen, Y.X.; Zhang, M.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Dai, W. The Sirt1 activator SRT1720 attenuates angiotensin II-induced atherosclerosis in apoE(-)/(-) mice through inhibiting vascular inflammatory response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 465, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Venkatasubramanian, S.; Noh, R.M.; Daga, S.; Langrish, J.P.; Joshi, N.V.; Mills, N.L.; Hoffmann, E.; Jacobson, E.W.; Vlasuk, G.P.; Waterhouse, B.R.; et al. Cardiovascular effects of a novel SIRT1 activator, SRT2104, in otherwise healthy cigarette smokers. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Berman, A.Y.; Motechin, R.A.; Wiesenfeld, M.Y.; Holz, M.K. The therapeutic potential of resveratrol: A review of clinical trials. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2017, 1, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Egert, S.; Boesch-Saadatmandi, C.; Wolffram, S.; Rimbach, G.; Muller, M.J. Serum lipid and blood pressure responses to quercetin vary in overweight patients by apolipoprotein E genotype. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Breitenstein, A.; Wyss, C.A.; Spescha, R.D.; Franzeck, F.C.; Hof, D.; Riwanto, M.; Hasun, M.; Akhmedov, A.; von Eckardstein, A.; Maier, W.; et al. Peripheral blood monocyte Sirt1 expression is reduced in patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jpm 11 00103 g001 550
Figure 1. Endothelial cell behaviour during atherosclerotic plaque formation. (A) Atherosclerosis risk factors evoke endothelial cell activation, oxidative stress, and dysfunction in endothelial cells, resulting in increased vascular permeability to lipids (1), and the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the vessel wall (2). Endothelial cells (ECs) may also contribute to neointima formation by endothelial–mesenchymal transition (3). (B) Detailed view of intercellular interactions during (1) increased vessel permeability, (2) vessel wall inflammation and foam cell differentiation and (3) endothelial–mesenchymal transition. Loss of EC markers are represented in pink and gain of mesenchymal markers are represented in brown. (C) Overview of intracellular signalling in endothelial cells that links dyslipidaemia to (1) endothelial cell oxidative stress and dysfunction, (2) inflammatory activation, and (3) endothelial-mesenchymal transition. (ox)LDL: (oxidized) low density lipoprotein, ROS: reactive oxygen species, SASP: senescence-associated secretory phenotype, ECM proteins: extracellular matrix proteins, MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, M-CSF: macrophage colony-stimulating factor, eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase, NO: nitric oxide.
Figure 1. Endothelial cell behaviour during atherosclerotic plaque formation. (A) Atherosclerosis risk factors evoke endothelial cell activation, oxidative stress, and dysfunction in endothelial cells, resulting in increased vascular permeability to lipids (1), and the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the vessel wall (2). Endothelial cells (ECs) may also contribute to neointima formation by endothelial–mesenchymal transition (3). (B) Detailed view of intercellular interactions during (1) increased vessel permeability, (2) vessel wall inflammation and foam cell differentiation and (3) endothelial–mesenchymal transition. Loss of EC markers are represented in pink and gain of mesenchymal markers are represented in brown. (C) Overview of intracellular signalling in endothelial cells that links dyslipidaemia to (1) endothelial cell oxidative stress and dysfunction, (2) inflammatory activation, and (3) endothelial-mesenchymal transition. (ox)LDL: (oxidized) low density lipoprotein, ROS: reactive oxygen species, SASP: senescence-associated secretory phenotype, ECM proteins: extracellular matrix proteins, MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, M-CSF: macrophage colony-stimulating factor, eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase, NO: nitric oxide.
Jpm 11 00103 g001
Jpm 11 00103 g002 550
Figure 2. Current and future anti-atherogenic therapies. Established atherogenic risk factors and processes are depicted in green bars and the current available and experimental therapies to counteract these atherogenic processes are depicted in the neighbouring bars. Current anti-atherogenic therapies successfully preclude hypertension, dyslipidaemia, inflammation, and thrombosis, however, endothelial dysfunction is not specifically targeted therapeutically. In this review we explain that the therapeutic targeting of the epigenetic enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1 mitigates endothelial cell activation and dysfunction and may block atherogenesis.
Figure 2. Current and future anti-atherogenic therapies. Established atherogenic risk factors and processes are depicted in green bars and the current available and experimental therapies to counteract these atherogenic processes are depicted in the neighbouring bars. Current anti-atherogenic therapies successfully preclude hypertension, dyslipidaemia, inflammation, and thrombosis, however, endothelial dysfunction is not specifically targeted therapeutically. In this review we explain that the therapeutic targeting of the epigenetic enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1 mitigates endothelial cell activation and dysfunction and may block atherogenesis.
Jpm 11 00103 g002
Jpm 11 00103 g003 550
Figure 3. Endothelial cell-derived atheroprotective effects mediated by EZH2 and SIRT1. During homeostasis, high SIRT1, and low EZH2 activity ensure endothelial homeostasis, characterized by NO production, anti-inflammatory signalling, and the inhibition of the expression of atheroprone genes. When the balance between EZH2 and SIRT1 signalling is disturbed by atheroprone risk factors (e.g., oxLDL, OSS, glycemia or hyperhomocysteinemia), endothelial dysfunction is initiated, which accumulated to lipid streak formation, inflammatory cell infiltration and neointima formation. Therapeutic restoration of the balance between EZH2 and SIRT1 activity may provide a novel treatment to preclude atherogenesis. HDL: high density lipoprotein, NO: nitric oxide, LSS: laminar shear stress; (ox)LDL: (oxidized) low density lipoprotein, OSS: oscillatory shear stress.
Figure 3. Endothelial cell-derived atheroprotective effects mediated by EZH2 and SIRT1. During homeostasis, high SIRT1, and low EZH2 activity ensure endothelial homeostasis, characterized by NO production, anti-inflammatory signalling, and the inhibition of the expression of atheroprone genes. When the balance between EZH2 and SIRT1 signalling is disturbed by atheroprone risk factors (e.g., oxLDL, OSS, glycemia or hyperhomocysteinemia), endothelial dysfunction is initiated, which accumulated to lipid streak formation, inflammatory cell infiltration and neointima formation. Therapeutic restoration of the balance between EZH2 and SIRT1 activity may provide a novel treatment to preclude atherogenesis. HDL: high density lipoprotein, NO: nitric oxide, LSS: laminar shear stress; (ox)LDL: (oxidized) low density lipoprotein, OSS: oscillatory shear stress.
Jpm 11 00103 g003
Table
Table 1. Current and experimental anti-atherogenic therapies.
Table 1. Current and experimental anti-atherogenic therapies.
Atherogenic TargetClassCompoundMolecular TargetStage of DevelopmentRefs
Hypertensionβ-blockersMetoprolol, Carvedilol, Bisoprololadrenergic β-receptorsMarketed[56,57,60,61]
ACE inhibitorsCaptopril, Benazepril, Perindopril, RamiprilAngiotensin-converting enzyme
Ca2+-channel blockersAmlodipine, NifedipineVoltage-dependent L−, N−, and T-type Ca2+ channels
DiureticsThiazideSolute carrier family 12 members
Angiotensin-Receptor blockers Losartan, ValsartanAngiotensin receptorMarketed[60,61,62,63]
DyslipidemiaHGM-CoA inhibitorsStatinsHMG-CoAMarketed[17,62]
PCSK9 inhibitorsEvolucumab, AlirocumabPCSK9
Cholesterol absorption inhibitorsEzetimibeNPC1L1, SOAT1
InflammationAntibodiesCanakinumab; Adalimumab, Infliximab, InclacumabCytokines (IL1β, TNFα), adhesion molecules (P-selectin)I-III[64,65,66]
Lipoxygenase inhibitorsAtreleutron, Veliflapon5-LO, FLAPII[67,68]
Phospholipase inhibitorsDarapladib, VarespladibLp-PLA2, sPLA2III[69,70]
CCL2-CCR2 inhibitors CCR2I[71]
ThrombosisThromboxane A2 inhibitorsAspirinCyclooxygenasesMarketed[72,73]
P2Y12 inhibitorsClopidegril, Ticagrelor, Prasugrel, CangrelorP2Y purinoceptor 12
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitorsTirofiban, Eptifibatide, Abciximbplatelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor
PAR-1 inhibitorsVorapaxarProteinase-activated receptor 1
5-LO = 5-lipoxygenase; CCL2 = C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1); CCR2 = C-C chemokine receptor type 2; FLAP = 5-LO activating protein; HMG-CoA = β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-CoA; Lp-PLA2 = lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2; NPC1L1 = Niemann–Pick C1-like protein 1; PSCK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; SOAT1 = sterol O-acyltransferase 1; sPLA2 = secretory phospholipase A2.
Table
Table 2. Endothelial cell-mediated antiatherogenic effects induced by EZH2 antagonism or SIRT1 agonism.
Table 2. Endothelial cell-mediated antiatherogenic effects induced by EZH2 antagonism or SIRT1 agonism.
Atherogenic PhaseEndothelial Cell-Derived Atheroprotective Effects
EZH2 AntagonismSIRT1 Agonism
Endothelial cell activation, dysfunction, and fatty streak formation
·
EZH2 antagonism increases NO production [119]
·
EZH2 antagonism decreases ECs apoptosis [120]
·
SIRT1 agonism decreases EC oxLDL uptake [121]
·
SIRT1 agonism decreases endothelial oxidative stress [121,122,123,124,125]
·
SIRT1 agonism increases NO production [126,127,128]
Inflammatory cell infiltration and inflammation
·
EZH2 antagonism decreases EC inflammatory activation via increased ERK5 [110,115,116,129,130]
·
SIRT1 agonism decreases EC inflammatory activation [112,131]
·
SIRT1 agonism decreases EC senescence [132,133,134,135,136]
Neointima formation
·
EZH2 antagonism attenuates TGFβ-induced EndMT [116]
·
SIRT1 agonism blocks TGFβ-induced EndMT [137,138]
·
SIRT1 agonism blocks endothelial secretion of fibrogenic factors [139]
Atherothrombosis
·
SIRT1 agonism increases EC anti-thrombogenicity [140,141,142]
Table
Table 3. Industry-sponsored active and completed clinical studies investigating EZH2 antagonism or SIRT1 agonism.
Table 3. Industry-sponsored active and completed clinical studies investigating EZH2 antagonism or SIRT1 agonism.
MechanismDrugField of UseClinical Phase of DevelopmentNumber of Active StudiesDeveloperClinical Trial Identifier (s)
EZH2 antagonistCPI-0209OncologyI–II1Constellation PharmaceuticalsNCT04104776
CPI-1205OncologyI–II3Constellation PharmaceuticalsNCT02395601, NCT03525795, NCT03480646
GSK2816126OncologyI1GlaxoSmithKlineNCT02082977
HH2853OncologyI1Haihe PharmaceuticalNCT04390737
PF-06821497OncologyI1PfizerNCT03460977
SHR2554OncologyI–II5Jiangsu HengRui MedicineNCT04577885, NCT04627129, NCT04335266, NCT03741712, NCT04407741
MAK683 I1NovartisNCT02900651
TazemetostatOncologyI–III15EpizymeNCT03009344, NCT03010982, NCT03028103, NCT02220842, NCT02875548, NCT03456726, NCT01897571, NCT02889523, NCT03155620, NCT04204941, NCT04224493, NCT02860286, NCT04179864, NCT02601950, NCT03854474
SIRT1 agonistQuercetinCardiovascularII–III3Quercegen Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer IngelheimNCT03943459, NCT02195232, NCT02191280
OrthopaedicsIII1NestléNCT00330096
PulmonologyI–II3Quercegen Pharmaceuticals, AB ScienceNCT03989271, NCT01708278, NCT04622865
ResveratrolCardiovascularI–III6Atrium Innovations, DSM Nutritional Products, Gateway Health Alliance, KGK Science, Fluxome SciencesNCT01964846, NCT01364961, NCT01564381, NCT02415114, NCT01914081, NCT01668836
DermatologyI1TCI CoNCT04456829
MetabolicII–III9DSM Nutritional Products, Vedic Lifesciences NCT01038089, NCT02216552, NCT02129595, NCT02565979, NCT01635114, NCT00823381, NCT00998504, NCT02834078, NCT02219906
NeurologyI–II9Bial-Portela (BIA 6-512), Evolva (Veri-te)NCT03095092, NCT03093389, NCT03095105, NCT03091543, NCT03094156, NCT03097211, NCT04314739, NCT03448094, NCT02621554
NephrologyIII1 NCT02433925
OncologyI GlaxoSmithKline NCT00920803
PulmonologyI–III1DSM Nutritional Products (Resvida)NCT02245932, NCT02245962, NCT04166396
SRT2379MetabolicI2GlaxoSmithKlineNCT01262911, NCT01416376
NephrologyI1GlaxoSmithKlineNCT01018628
SRT2104MetabolicI–II7GlaxoSmithKlineNCT00938275, NCT00933530, NCT00933062, NCT00937872, NCT01031108, NCT00937326, NCT01018017
NephrologyI1GlaxoSmithKlineNCT01014117
PulmonologyI1GlaxoSmithKlineNCT00920660
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fledderus, J.; Vanchin, B.; Rots, M.G.; Krenning, G. The Endothelium as a Target for Anti-Atherogenic Therapy: A Focus on the Epigenetic Enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020103

AMA Style

Fledderus J, Vanchin B, Rots MG, Krenning G. The Endothelium as a Target for Anti-Atherogenic Therapy: A Focus on the Epigenetic Enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021; 11(2):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fledderus, Jolien, Byambasuren Vanchin, Marianne G. Rots, and Guido Krenning. 2021. "The Endothelium as a Target for Anti-Atherogenic Therapy: A Focus on the Epigenetic Enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1" Journal of Personalized Medicine 11, no. 2: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020103

APA Style

Fledderus, J., Vanchin, B., Rots, M. G., & Krenning, G. (2021). The Endothelium as a Target for Anti-Atherogenic Therapy: A Focus on the Epigenetic Enzymes EZH2 and SIRT1. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop