Next Article in Journal
The Phylogenetic Relationships of Tiaronthophagus n.gen. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Onthophagini) Evaluated by Phenotypic Characters
Previous Article in Journal
Odonata: Who They Are and What They Have Done for Us Lately: Classification and Ecosystem Services of Dragonflies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Field and Laboratory Performance of False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Troticidae) on Orange and Selected Vegetables

by
Abdullah Mohamed Mkiga
1,2,*,
Samira Abuelgasim Mohamed
1,
Hannalene du Plessis
2,
Fathiya Mbarak Khamis
1 and
Sunday Ekesi
1
1
Plant Health Division, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi 00100, Kenya
2
Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2019, 10(3), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030063
Submission received: 21 December 2018 / Revised: 28 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 February 2019 / Published: 28 February 2019

Abstract

:
False codling moth (FCM), Thaumatotibia leucotreta is a key pest of citrus orange and other plants causing fruit loss through larval feeding. Although this pest is native to sub-Saharan Africa little is known on its performance on orange and vegetables in Kenya and Tanzania. Our objective was to assess the incidence, oviposition preference and offspring performance of FCM on orange and vegetables, namely, okra, African eggplant, chili and sweet peppers. A higher percentage of orange with FCM damage symptoms was recorded from the ground than from the tree sampled fruit. However, FCM larval incidence was higher for the latter (tree sampled fruit). The highest FCM larval incidence amongst the vegetables was recorded on African eggplant (12%) while the lowest was on okra (3%). Orange was the most while African eggplant was the least preferred for oviposition by FCM. Among the vegetables tested, strong oviposition preference was found for sweet pepper; however, larval survival was lowest (62%) on this crop. Highest larval survival (77%) was recorded on orange. Most demographic parameters (i.e., intrinsic rate of increase, doubling time) were comparable among the studied host plants. The results are discussed in line of FCM management.

1. Introduction

Fruit and vegetable production are important source of income for East African growers. Production of these crops is, however, constrained by insect pests and diseases resulting in yield loss and poor quality. The false codling moth (FCM), Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), one of the pests of these crops, is native to sub-Saharan Africa [1] and has been recorded on 24 cultivated and 50 wild species in different plant families [2]. It is a key pest of citrus (Rutaceae) [3,4], avocado, Persea americana (Mill) (Lauraceae) [5] macadamias, Macadamia spp. (Proteaceae) [6] and cotton, Gossypium spp. (Malvaceae) [1]. Thaumatotibia leucotreta is a multivoltine pest [7] which does not enter diapause leading to year-round overlapping generations on host plants [8]. The female moths lay eggs on fruit, often near the stylar end [9]. The hatched larvae penetrate and feed inside the fruit resulting in fruit dropping. Damage symptoms caused by T. leucotreta vary with the host plant. For example, scull on avocado [5] and a yellowish-brown rind around a penetration hole on citrus orange [4] have been documented. Larval incidence on orange can be up to 75% [10]. In addition to direct losses, T. leucotreta infestations also cause financial losses due to quarantine restrictions imposed on exporting countries and detection of a single larva can result in rejection of an entire consignment [9].
Although South Africa and Egypt are the largest citrus producing countries in Africa, Tanzania and Kenya are considered as the leading countries in citrus production in East Africa [11]. Citrus production in Tanzania is largely concentrated on the North East Coast. The main production areas are in Tanga and Coast region, followed by Morogoro, Mwanza and Ruvuma. In Kenya, citrus production is concentrated in Coast, Eastern and Rift valley provinces [12]. Although T. leucotreta has been reported in Kenya and Tanzania [13], little is known about the larval incidence of the pest especially during the citrus orange fruit harvesting period. Orange is produced from low to high altitudes in these countries. Altitudinal gradients and vegetation had been reported to influence distribution and abundance of moths [14,15,16], which are highly diverse and ecologically important herbivorous insects [17]. Odanga et al. [13] reported similar T. leucotreta infestations on avocado grown at different altitudinal gradients in Kenya and Tanzania. Knowledge on the effect of altitude on T. leucotreta infestation on orange will contribute to management of the pest. The incidence of the pest on other crops which may serve as alternative host crops between successive orange fruiting seasons is not well known.
The ovipositional preference and offspring performance of T. leucotreta on orange in a laboratory study was reported by Love et al. [18]. The ovipositional preference of the pest on orange and vegetables has not been determined. According to Thompson and Pellmyr [19], the plant selection made by egg laying females may often provide the initial basis for divergence of insect populations onto different plant species and it may drive the evolution of some plant defences. Developmental biology and adult life parameters of T. leucotreta reared on artificial diet have been reported [8,20,21,22] and to a limited extend on orange, grapes and apple [23]. However, no detailed study on the offspring performance of T. leucotreta on other key host plants has been reported. The field dynamics of T. leucotreta in a mixed cropping system, a common practice in sub-Saharan Africa, need to be investigated to develop better management strategies. The aims of this study were therefore to determine T. leucotreta larval incidence on ripe orange as well as on mature vegetables of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench var. Clemson), African eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum L., var. Tengeru white), chili pepper (Capsicum anuum L., var. Jalapeno) and sweet pepper (Capsicum anuum L., var. California Wonder). These vegetables are mainly grown near or within orange orchards. The developmental performance and life table parameters of the pest on three solanaceous vegetables viz. chili, sweet pepper and African eggplant were also determined and compared to that of orange, the most common host.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

Field surveys were carried out between June and September 2017. In Kenya, the survey was conducted in three citrus producing areas namely Kilifi (3°13′6.3″ S, 40°6′54.49″ E), Makueni (1°47′11.38″ S, 37°57′51.99″ E) and Machakos (1°16′1.23″ S, 37°19′12.64″ E) representing low (0–500 masl), mid (501–1200 masl) and high (1201 masl and above) altitudes, respectively (Figure 1). Rainfall in these regions is bimodal. The short rains occur from November to December and the long rains are between March and May. In Tanzania, the study was carried out in Tanga (5°5′19.95″ S, 39°6′8.36″ E), Morogoro (8°3′50.31″ S, 36°57′14.79″ E) and Mwanza (2°52′40.81″ S, 32°43′5.3″ E) regions (Figure 1) representing low, mid and high altitudes respectively. The rainfall pattern in the former and latter region is bimodal and occurs during the same months as that in the Kenyan sites. Morogoro lies in a transition zone between a monomodal and bimodal rainfall pattern.

2.2. Assessment of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Incidence on Orange in Kenya and Tanzania

Ripe orange fruit sampling was conducted from June to September 2017 in the three rainfed citrus producing areas of Kenya and Tanzania (Figure 1). The fruit were sampled from 25 orchards in each of the selected altitudes in the two countries. Ten trees were randomly selected from each orchard, from which 10 fruit were sampled for each sampling method. Each sampling method was executed on each of the selected trees. Firstly, fruit were sampled from the ground, followed by sampling from the tree without shaking and lastly by shaking the branches of the tree. In total, 100 fruit were sampled per method per orchard. Thaumatotibia leucotreta damage symptoms were recorded for each fruit, washed using a non-caustic liquid dish washing soap and incubated for three weeks. The incubated fruit were dissected and the T. leucotreta larvae or pupae counted. The last instar larvae collected were placed in plastic containers (Kenpoly) (2 L) with a thin layer of soft sand covering the bottoms. Smaller larvae were transferred to glass jars containing an artificial diet developed by Moore et al. [24] and reared until pupation. Identification of T. leucotreta adults enclosing from the pupae were confirmed using standard keys. The percentage of orange fruit with T. leucotreta damage symptoms as well as percentage fruit infested with T. leucotreta larvae were calculated.

2.3. Assessment of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Incidence in Vegetables from Morogoro, Tanzania

Vegetable sampling was conducted at Mlali ward in Morogoro rural (Figure 1, Table 1) between November and December 2017 following the orange fruiting season. The study site was determined by the availability of vegetable fields near the citrus orchards. Eight fields planted with only one vegetable crop were selected for sampling. These fields were at least 0.1 ha in size and planted with okra, sweet peppers, chili pepper, and African eggplant respectively. The fields were selected on western side and within 100 m from orchard(s). Three hundred matured vegetables per species were randomly collected from each field. The vegetable samples were incubated separately in plastic containers (Kenpoly) (2 L) covered with fine mesh at the top for ventilation. These containers were kept in a laboratory at ambient conditions (23–28 °C) for three weeks before dissection of the vegetables and counting of T. leucotreta larvae or pupae. Percentage T. leucotreta larval incidence was calculated only. Since T. leucotreta damage symptoms on vegetables were not as clear as on oranges, assessment of the percentage of vegetables with damage symptoms caused by this pest, was excluded from the study.

2.4. Laboratory Performance of Thaumatotibia leucotreta on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

2.4.1. Insect Cultures and Host

Insects were obtained from the mass rearing room at the Animal and Quarantine Containment Unit at the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya. This colony was established from field-collected larvae from citrus orange, Citrus sinensis L. var Washington Navel fruit in Wote, Makueni county (1°47′11.38″ S, 37°57′51.99″ E) and had been maintained continuously for over 33 generations. The colonies were maintained on artificial diet described by Moore et al. [24] and kept in preserve jars (corked with cotton wool). The procedures for diet preparation and the inoculation of eggs and larvae as well as moth collection were adopted from Opoku-Debrah et al. [25] with slight modifications as described below. The diet in the jars was autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min then cooled in a laminar-flow cabinet. To obtain eggs, newly emerged moths were transferred to a small rectangular Perspex cage (37 × 22 × 6 cm). The cage was made at icipe. A wax paper sheet was inserted into the cage through a slit in the floor to serve as an oviposition substrate for the moths. Wet cotton wool as a source of water for the moths, was plugged into a hole cut at one side of the cage. The oviposition sheet was removed daily, cut into equal pieces, surface-sterilized with 25% formaldehyde (35%–40%, v/v stock solution, Minema®) and placed onto the diet for egg hatching. The neonates fed on the diet and pupated in the cotton wool plug, which was then transferred into a wooden moth emergence box (40 × 40 × 40 cm) made at icipe. Eclosing moths were attracted through an exit hole on the side of the emergence box by light, entering through glass vials (32.6 cm3). The colony was maintained at 25.0 ± 2.0 °C, 60% relative humidity and 12-h photoperiod (L12:D12).

2.4.2. Oviposition Preference of Thaumatotibia leucotreta for Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

Choice Test

Newly emerged naive T. leucotreta moths were obtained from a colony reared on artificial diet. The moths were sexed based on the presence of densely packed black fringes of hair on the hind tibia of male T. leucotreta as described by Gilligan et al. [1]. One male-female T. leucotreta pair was placed in a vial (32.6 cm3) closed with moist cotton wool to serve as a source of water [25] and kept for 24 h to mate. A choice test was conducted by placing one fruit each of orange, African eggplant, chili and sweet peppers per corner of the experimental cage (50 × 50 × 50 cm). The cage was also made at icipe and had two openings (diameter 10 cm) on two opposite sides. One of the openings was covered with netting cloth; and the other was fitted with a fine netting sleeve for easy handling of the insects and fruit [26]. Eight moths (1:1 ♀:♂) were released at 20:00 h in the cage and left to oviposit for four hours. The fruit were then removed and the number of eggs on each fruit was counted. The fruit were incubated as described above. The experiment was replicated 12 times, for each replicate the position of the fruit was rotated ensuring that every fruit type was placed in each position of the cage an equal number of times.

No-choice Test

The no-choice test was done similar to the choice test but with only one type of fruit placed separately per Perspex cage (20 × 15 × 15 cm). Four moths were released in each cage. A replicate consisted of four cages with one fruit per cage. This no-choice test was replicated 12 times.

2.5. Developmental Duration and Larval Mass of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Reared on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

2.5.1. Insect Colonies and Hosts

Eggs obtained from the rearing colony were incubated in 2 L plastic containers (Kenpoly) until hatching. Two neonate larvae were transferred onto individual fresh fruit of orange, var Washington Navel, African eggplant, chili and sweet peppers of similar cultivars as above, collected from farmers’ fields at Wote, Makueni and Kangundo, Machakos. The inoculated fruit were incubated until final instar larvae exited. The larvae from each fruit type were transferred into separate ventilated plastic containers (Kenpoly) (2 L) with a thin layer of sterilized soft sand for pupation. The containers with the pupae were placed in separate emergence boxes. Adult collection was done following the procedures described above.

2.5.2. Egg Stage

Four Perspex oviposition cages (37 × 22 × 6 cm) were used to obtain T. leucotreta eggs from moths of which larvae were reared on the respective host plants, viz. orange, African eggplant, chili and sweet peppers. Newly emerged moths were transferred to separate cage containing wax paper sheet for oviposition. Wax paper sheets with eggs were removed and cut into four strips containing at least 100 eggs. The eggs were counted under a stereomicroscope (Leica WILD M3Z). Each strip of wax paper with eggs from moths for each host plant was individually placed in plastic containers (Kenpoly) (2 L) to allow for hatching. The eggs were checked under a microscope twice a day for emergence of neonates. Egg incubation period was recorded as time in days taken for 50% of eggs to hatch as described by Mkiga and Mwatawala [27]. The experiment was replicated four times.

2.5.3. Larval Stage

Duration of T. leucotreta larval development was determined on each host fruit type. Upon hatching, a cohort of 100 one day old neonates originating from eggs laid by T. leucotreta reared from orange, African eggplant, chili and sweet pepper were inoculated onto a fruit placed in a plastic container following the procedures described by Love et al. [18]. A total of 50 fruit for each replicate were used per each host. The inoculated fruit were incubated individually in ventilated plastic containers (Kenpoly) (2 L) on sterile sand. The fruit were observed daily until final instar larval exited from the fruit. Duration of T. leucotreta larval development was recorded as time in days taken for 50% of final instar larvae to exit from the fruit for pupation. The experiment was replicated four times.
To determine the effect of the rearing host on larval mass, recently exited T. leucotreta larvae from each host plant were weighed individually using a digital analytical balance (Sartorius CPA225D, Germany). Ten larvae were weighed per replicate for each host plant and the experiment was replicated four times.

2.5.4. Pre-Pupal Stage

To obtain final instar T. leucotreta larvae from each host, 300 neonates originating from eggs laid by T. leucotreta reared from orange, African eggplant, chili and sweet pepper were transferred onto orange fruit and the respective vegetables. The neonates were collected following the procedures described above. A cohort of 100 final instar larvae exited from each fruit type on the same day were introduced into the four ventilated plastic containers (25 larvae/container) containing a thin layer of soft sterilized sand as pupation media. The larvae were monitored every 12 h until cocoon formation. Duration of the pre-pupal stage was recorded as time in days taken for 50% of final instar larvae to form cocoons. The experiment was replicated four times and each replicate contained 100 larvae.

2.5.5. Pupal Stage

Pupae were obtained by rearing larvae, inoculated as neonates onto the fruit of each host until cocoon formation following the procedures above. A cohort of 100 cocoons were carefully collected and placed in a Perspex cage (15 cm × 15 cm × 10 cm) manufactured at icipe and monitored daily for adult eclosion. Pupal duration was recorded as time in days taken for T. leucotreta adults to eclose from 50% of the cocoons.

2.5.6. Survival of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Reared on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

Thaumatotibia leucotreta stage specific survival was determined using the cohorts from the developmental duration bioassays above to calculate the percentage of eggs laid on the wax paper strips for each plant species that successfully hatched, percentage of neonates that successfully developed into final instars larvae, percentage of cocoons formed from the final instar larvae and percentage of adults that eclosed from cocoons.

2.5.7. Adult Life History of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Reared on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

Adult T. leucotetra life history was assessed using a cohort of newly emerged moths from larvae reared on orange, sweet pepper, African eggplant and chili pepper. The sex ratio was determined by counting the number of males and females from a sample of 100 moths emerging from pupae from which the larvae were reared on each host plant species. One male-female pair of moths was kept in a vial (32.6 cm3) corked with wet cotton wool serving as a source of water. A total of 15 vials were used for each host. The pre-oviposition period was recorded as the number of days from adult eclosion until the first eggs were laid. The pair of moths were carefully removed from the vial and transferred into a new vial using the protocol described by Opoku-Debrah et al. [25]. The number of eggs laid by the female per vial was counted using a magnifying lens. Mortality of the moths was also recorded daily. The experiments were replicated four times.
The net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), mean generation time (T), doubling time (DT) and finite rate of increase (λ) were calculated using the equations from Carey [28].

2.6. Data Analysis

The percentage of orange fruit and vegetables (African eggplant, okra, chili and sweet peppers) with T. leucotreta damage symptoms as well as fruit containing T. leucotreta larvae were arcsine transformed before analysis. Data on percentage of orange fruit with T. leucotreta damage symptoms as well as fruit with larvae of the pest were analysed with a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test to determine statistically significant differences between countries, altitudes and sampling methods. Data on percentage of infested vegetable fruit of the respective host plants were analysed by means of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test. Thaumatotibia leucotreta development time, larval mass and adult life history parameters were analysed by means of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test. Data on T. leucotreta survival in the developmental experiments were analysed using logistic regression models followed by Tukey’s HSD test. Likelihood ratio test on a GLM (family: negative binomial link: log) was used to analyse the number of eggs laid per fruit in the oviposition preference assays as well as the number of eggs laid per day by each female reared from the respective hosts. Pairwise comparison of Least Squares Means (LSMeans; package lsmeans,’ function ‘lsmeans’) of number of eggs laid on choice and no-choice tests and daily oviposition of moths reared on the respective hosts was done with Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed using R-version (3.5.2) statistical software packages (R Development Core Team [29]).

3. Results

3.1. Percentage of Orange Fruit with Thaumatotibia leucotreta Damage Symptoms and Larvae

Significantly more T. leucotreta damaged fruit (F = 39.28, df = 1,444, p ˂ 0.001) and higher larval incidence were recorded in Kenya than in Tanzania (F = 26.43, df = 1,444, p ˂ 0.001) (Table 2). The percentage of fruit with damage symptoms also differed significantly between the respective sampling methods (F = 277.43, df = 2,444, p ˂ 0.001). Significantly more fruit with symptoms were sampled from the ground compared to those sampled from the tree by branch shaking or without shaking (Table 2). The percentage of damaged fruit sampled from the ground did, however, not differ significantly between low, mid and high altitudes in both countries (Table 2). There were, a significantly lower percentage of damaged fruit found on trees without branch shaking at low, compared to mid and high altitudes in Tanzania but not in Kenya. No significant difference in percentage of damaged fruits sampled after the branches of trees were shaken at low, mid and high altitudes existed in Tanzania but a significantly lower percentage of T. leucotreta damaged fruit were sampled at low altitude in Kenya (Table 2). Significantly higher percentages of damaged fruit were also sampled from high and mid altitudes compared to low altitudes (F = 31.53, df = 2,444, p ˂ 0.001). Significantly fewer larvae were found in damaged fruit sampled from the ground at low compared to high altitudes in Kenya. In Tanzania, the percentage of larval infestation per sampling method was similar, regardless of altitude (Table 2). The percentage larval incidence in fruit sampled from the trees as well as from the ground after branch shaking did, however, not differ significantly at the respective altitudes in both countries. Larval incidence was significantly higher in high and mid compared to low altitude (Table 2).

3.2. Incidence of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Larvae in Vegetables

The incidence of T. leucotetra differed significantly among the vegetables (F = 9.812, df = 3, 28, p ˂ 0.001). There was no significant difference in percentage T. leucotetra larval infested African eggplant, chili and sweet pepper. Significantly fewer okra was, however, infested compared to the other vegetables (Table 3).

3.3. Oviposition Preference of Thaumatotibia leucotreta for Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

3.3.1. Choice Test

The mean number of eggs laid per fruit in the choice test varied significantly among the host plants (LR = 153.21, df = 3, p = 0.001) (Figure 2A). The highest number of eggs was recorded on orange followed by sweet and chili pepper. The lowest number of eggs was laid on African eggplant, with no significant difference in oviposition choice between African eggplant and chili pepper.

3.3.2. No-choice Test

The highest number of eggs were also laid on orange in the no-choice test with African eggplant and chili pepper being the least preferred for oviposition (Figure 2B). The number of eggs laid on sweet pepper was significantly less than laid on orange but sweet pepper was significantly more preferred for oviposition than chili pepper and African eggplant (LR = 146.97, df = 3, p = 0.001).

3.4. Development Time of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Immature Stages and Final Larval Instar Mass when Reared on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

The host plant on which a specific generation was reared had no significant effect on the egg incubation period of T. leucotreta (F = 0.13; df = 3, 12; p = 0.937). The larval development time (neonates to final instars) differed significantly among the respective solanaceous vegetables (F = 5.63; df = 3, 12; p < 0.001) (Figure 3A). Development was significantly shorter on orange compared to sweet and chili peppers. Larval development time on African eggplant, did, however, not differ significantly from development time on orange. The prepupal period from larvae reared on the respective host plant species did not differ significantly (F = 0.96; df = 3, 12; p = 0.444) but duration of the pupae originated from larvae reared on these solanaceous vegetables differed significantly (F = 4.84; df = 3, 12; p < 0.040) (Figure 3B). Pupal duration from which the larvae were reared on orange was significantly shorter compared to sweet pepper (Figure 3B). There was, however, no significant difference in duration of pupae originating from larvae reared on African eggplant, chili and sweet pepper.
Mass of final instar larvae reared on orange was significantly higher compared to larvae reared on vegetables (African eggplant, chili and sweet pepper) (F = 5.84; df = 3, 12; p = 0.011). It did, however not differ significantly between the vegetables (Figure 4).

3.5. Development and Survival of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Immature Stages Reared on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

The percentage fertility of eggs laid by moths of which larvae were reared on orange, sweet pepper, chili pepper and African eggplant in the previous generation did not differ significantly (χ2 = 26.436, df = 3, 12; p < 0.916). The percentage of larvae that survived differed significantly between the rearing hosts (χ2 = 65.049, df =3,12; p ˂ 0.001). A significantly higher percentage of larvae reared on orange survived compared to sweet and chili peppers (Figure 5). The percentage surviving larvae reared on orange and African eggplant did, however, not differ significantly. The percentage pupae that survived from larvae reared on these four host plants did not differ significantly (χ2 = 8.018, df = 3, 12; p = 0.904) as well as the percentage of adults that eclosed from these pupae (χ2 = 16.456, df = 3, 12; p = 0.937).

3.6. Reproductive Parameters for Thaumatotibia leucotreta Reared on Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

The host plant on which the larvae were reared did not significantly affect the pre-oviposition period (F = 0.08; df =3, 12; p = 0.971), oviposition period (F = 0.48; df = 3,12; p = 0.703), female longevity (F = 0.16; df = 3,12; p = 0.923) and male longevity (F = 0.04; df = 3,12; p = 0.990) (Table 4). The fecundity of the moths from larvae reared on the different host plants was, however, significantly different (F = 32.32; df = 3,12; p ˂ 0.001). Moths originating from larvae that were reared on orange laid significantly more eggs than moths from larvae reared on African eggplant as well as on sweet and chili peppers. Moths from African eggplant reared larvae were also more fecund than those reared on sweet peppers but fecundity of moths reared on African eggplant and chili pepper was similar.

3.6.1. Fecundity per Female per Day

There was no significant interaction (LR = 200.0, df = 3, 24; p = 0.205) between moth age and host plant in terms of daily oviposition (Figure 6). Host plant used for rearing the larvae did, however, had a significant effect on egg laying (LR = 3556.4, df = 3, p ˂ 0.001). Moths from larvae reared on orange laid the most eggs per day. The number of eggs laid per day varied considerably with female age (LR = 229.4, df = 8, p ˂ 0.001). The most eggs were laid by moths from larvae reared on orange, five days after moth eclosion. Egg laying for females reared on the other host plants peaked on the fourth day after moth eclosion. On the days where oviposition was high, females from the larvae reared in orange laid more egg followed by females from larvae reared from African eggplant, chili and sweet peppers.

3.6.2. Pairwise Comparison on Fecundity Rate of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Reared from Orange and Solanaceous Hosts

Pairwise comparison of the three days where oviposition was highest (Table 5), for T. leucotreta reared from orange and solanaceous hosts shows that oviposition of females reared from the tested hosts on day three was comparable. On day four, the females reared from orange oviposited significantly more eggs when compared to each solanaceous host. However, the number of eggs oviposited by the females reared from solanaceous hosts did not differ significantly when compared to each other. On day five, the number of eggs laid by T. leucotreta females reared from orange was significantly higher than from females reared on sweet pepper.

3.7. Life History Parameters of Thaumatotibia leucotreta Reared from Orange and Solanaceous Vegetables

Net reproductive rate of T. leucotreta reared on the respective hosts differed significantly (F = 30.61; df = 3, 12; p ˂ 0.001) (Table 6). The highest net reproductive rate was recorded for females reared from larvae reared on orange followed by those reared on eggplant while the lowest was from larvae on sweet pepper. Other demographic parameters; mean generation time (F = 0.50; df = 3, 12; p = 0.688), intrinsic rate of increase (F = 1.23; df = 3, 12; p = 0.341), doubling time (F = 1.43; df = 3, 12; p = 0.284) and finite rate of increase (F = 1.77; df = 3, 12; p = 0.207) were similar for females reared from larvae on the respective host plants.

4. Discussion

Thaumatotibia leucotreta occurred in all surveyed sites of Kenya and Tanzania from low to high altitudes. The higher percentage of damaged fruit recorded in Kenya compared to Tanzania could be attributed to the different farming practices within each country. In Kenya, most citrus trees are intercropped with peppers and maize which are also recorded as crop hosts of T. leucotreta [1,6] while such practices are not common in Tanzania. Pests and diseases are generally controlled by means of pesticide application, which may result in a reduction of the natural enemy populations in the citrus orchards in Tanzania. According to Hofmeyr and Pringle [30], excessive use of broad spectrum chemical pesticides causes pest outbreaks due to disruption of natural enemies and it could also lead to the development of insecticide resistance. The fruit sampled from the ground had a higher percentage of T. leucotreta damage symptoms than those sampled from trees (with or without branch shaking). Higher T. leucotreta larval incidence was, however, recorded from fruit sampled after shaking of the tree branches. This could be ascribed to T. leucotreta laying eggs mainly on fruit while they are still on the trees [31] and the larvae completing their development while the fruit is still on the tree [9]. When the fruit drop to the ground, the larvae would have already completed their development and exited the fruit to pupate in the soil. Lower larval incidence was therefore recorded in the fruit sampled on the ground. Although. T. leucotreta infested fruit do often not show damage symptoms, final instar larvae may be present in the fruit mainly in the centre cores. This may have implications for T. leucotreta management especially in terms of orchard sanitation and post-harvest treatment. Proper orange orchard sanitation and harvesting should therefore also take in consideration infested fruit that is still on the tree by shaking of the branches. Higher T. leucotreta larval incidence on orange fruit was recorded in high than low altitudes of both countries. In contrast, Odanga et al. [13] reported a similar population density and number of infested avocado fruit in different altitudes of Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania and Taita Hills in Kenya. This difference could possibly be ascribed to the difference in crop and altitudinal ranges.
Amongst the vegetables sampled, the highest percentage of T. leucotreta infested fruit was on African eggplant compared to okra, sweet and chili peppers. This could be due to the lower moisture content of the fruit of this host plant, since infested African eggplant produced very little fluid under field and laboratory conditions. According to Jaenike [32], the suitability of a plant for larval development is a function of many variables, including its chemical and physical properties, microhabitat and degree of infestation. During dissection of fruit, final instar larvae were also mainly found in the central core of orange and placenta of peppers where very little fluid was produced due to insect feeding and decay. African eggplant, okra, sweet and chili pepper serve as reservoirs for T. leucotreta when grown in the vicinity or in mixed cropping with orange orchards. These vegetables are also grown throughout the year in irrigated fields which provides a continuous availability of host plants for this pest.
Although vegetables can serve as host plants for T. leucotreta, oranges were the most preferred host plant for oviposition in both choice and no-choice tests. The T. leucotreta moths do prefer certain orange varieties above others for oviposition. For example, Love et al. [18] reported that Fischer Navels were the least preferred early maturing variety for oviposition. Navel oranges were reported to be more preferred for oviposition than Valencia oranges and guava [33]. Most of the available literature report on the oviposition preference of T. leucotreta for different citrus varieties and guava under laboratory and field conditions [18,33]. This study provides additional information on T. leucotreta ovipositional preference for and performance on solanaceous vegetables, with chili and sweet pepper more preferred for oviposition than African eggplant.
In general, insects are reported to oviposit on hosts that maximize the performance of their progeny, a hypothesis referred to as “mother knows best” [19,32,34,35]. In this study, oviposition preference by T. leucotreta did not mirror host suitability for development of the immatures and survival on these host plants. The sweet and chili peppers which were more preferred than African eggplant for oviposition were less suitable in terms of developmental time, larval mass and survival of immature stages (larvae and pupae) as well as female fecundity and net reproductive rate. The mismatch between preferred vegetable hosts for oviposition and host suitability of peppers could be explored for use as trap crop. A similar finding was reported for the butterfly, Anthocharis cardamines (L) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). The oviposition preference of females did not correlate with the fitness parameter of the offspring reared on 51 populations of two ploidy types of the perennial herb Cardamine pratensis L. (Brassicales: Brassicaceae) [36]. The suitability of the African eggplant for development of the immature stages of T. leucotreta could be explained by the higher protein and lower moisture content of African eggplant compared to sweet and chili pepper [37,38,39]. Rearing host quality has also been reported to influence the developmental duration of other lepidopteran species. For example, Traore et al. [40] reported the larvae of Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) reared on cowpea flowers to have a short developmental time compared to those reared on the other plant parts. The effect of host plants on the life table parameters is dependent on the quality of certain components, such as carbon, nitrogen and defensive metabolites [41].
In this study, adult life table parameters for moths from larvae reared on the respective host plants are similar except for fecundity and net reproductive rate. Fecundity of T. leucotreta ranged from a total of 341 to 415 eggs per female for those reared on sweet pepper and orange, respectively. Both these values are within the range reported for fecundity of T. leucotreta from larvae reared on artificial diet [8,25]. Females reared on solanaceous vegetables laid fewer eggs than moths from larvae reared on orange. Daily egg laying peaked at day three and four after eclosion, for females reared on solanaceous vegetables and orange, respectively. Thaumatotibia leucotreta oviposition from larvae reared on artificial diet reached a peak, 2 and 3 days earlier than for the females reared on solanaceous vegetables and orange, respectively [8]. Generally, the highest daily fecundity was recorded for females reared from orange while the lowest was for females reared from sweet pepper. Oviposition peaked one day earlier (day three) for those of which larvae were reared on solanaceous vegetables than those reared on orange (day four) after moths emerged.
The intrinsic rate of natural increase, mean generation time, doubling time and finite rate of increase are important biotic parameters of insect performance [42,43]. Considering these parameters, survival of T. leucotreta is equal on orange, sweet and chili pepper as well as African eggplant. This has implications for management strategies of the pest. According to Birch [44] the intrinsic rate of increase is a basic parameter for insect population development, which is an indicator of the species developmental speed, longevity and fecundity [28].
Although oranges sampled from the ground had more T. leucotreta damage symptoms compared to fruit sampled from the trees, the latter hosted a higher number of T. leucotreta larvae. It is therefore recommended that citrus trees should be subjected to gentle shaking prior to fruit harvesting to reduce citrus orange post-harvest fruit decay and minimize indirect losses due to quarantine measures. Infested orange fruit from both ground and tree after branch shaking should be collected and removed using sustainable sanitation measures such as the use of augumentorio which sequesters the moth while conserving any parasitoids. This control tactic should be integrated with other T. leucotreta control measures such as the use of biopesticides viz. Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV), entomopathogenic nematode, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium anisopliae, Beauveria bassiana, attract and kill through the use of Lastcall® and the Sterile Insect Technique. The potential of solanaceous vegetables to act as T. leucotreta reservoirs between successive citrus orange seasons for rainfed orange production, the common cropping systems in Kenya and Tanzania were determined. The strong preference of T. leucotreta to chili and sweet peppers for oviposition and relatively higher mortality of the larvae on these crops could be explored for management of this pest using attract and kill approaches. Although there is currently a very potent male moth attractant commercially available, a need to identify semio-chemicals that can attract female T. leucotreta moths for both monitoring and suppression of the pest, is needed.

5. Conclusions

More ripe orange fruit with T. leucotreta damage symptoms are on the ground but the larvae are abundant in the fruit still hanging on the tree. Orange is strongly preferred for oviposition and highly suitable for T. leucotreta larval survival when compared to solanaceous vegetables. Thaumatotibia leucotreta has a strong oviposition preference to sweet and chili pepper compared to African eggplant. African eggplant is, however, highly suitable for larval survival. Fecundity is the only affected adult T. leucotreta fitness trait from larvae reared from orange and solanaceous vegetables. The findings from this study will contribute to sustainable management of this pest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., S.M., H.P., F.K. and S.E.; methodology, A.M., S.M., H.P., F.K.; software, A.M., S.M. and H.P.; validation, S.M., H.P., F.K. and S.E.; formal analysis, S.M., H.P., F.K. and S.E.; data curation A.M., S.M. and H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; supervision, S.M., H.P., F.K. and S.E.; project administration, S.M. and S.E.; funding acquisition, S.E.

Funding

This research was funded by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, through the project ‘‘Strengthening Citrus Production Systems through the Introduction of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Measures for Pests and Diseases in Kenya and Tanzania (SCIPM)”. Contract Number: 81180346, Project Number: 14.1432.5-001.00.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the funder. We gratefully acknowledge also the financial support for the core research agenda of icipe by the following organizations and agencies: UK Aid from the UK Government; Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); and the Kenyan Government. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors. The first author received a scholarship from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) through the African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science (ARPPIS) of icipe. The authors are also thankful to the GIS unit of icipe for map preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest “The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results”.

References

  1. Gilligan, T.M.; Epstein, M.E.; Hoffman, K.M. Discovery of false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick), in California (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2011, 113, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kirkman, W.; Moore, S. A study of alternative hosts for the false codling moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) leucotreta in the Eastern Cape. SA Fruit J. 2007, 6, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  3. Malan, A.P.; Knoetze, R.; Moore, S.D. Isolation and identification of entomopathogenic nematodes from citrus orchards in South Africa and their biocontrol potential against false codling moth. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2011, 108, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mazza, G.; Strangi, A.; Marinelli, L.; Del Nista, D.; Roversi, P.F. Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera Tortricidae) intercepted for the first time in Italy. Redia 2014, 97, 147–149. [Google Scholar]
  5. Erichsen, C.; Schoeman, A.S. Moth pests of avocados. S. Afr. Avocado Grow. Assoc. Yearb. 1994, 17, 109–112. [Google Scholar]
  6. Venette, R.C.; Davis, E.E.; DaCosta, M.; Heisler, H.; Larson, M. Mini Risk Assessment: False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) leucotreta (Meyrick) [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae]; University of Minnesota, Department of Entomology: Falcon Heights, MN, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boardman, L.; Grout, T.G.; Terblanche, J.S. False codling moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) larvae are chill-susceptible. Insect Sci. 2012, 19, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Daiber, C.C. A study of the biology of the false codling moth Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.): The adult and generations during the year. Phytophylactica 1980, 12, 187–193. [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore, S.D. Moths and butterflies: False codling moth. Citrus Res. Int. IPM Prod. Guidel. 2012, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moore, S.D.; Kirkman, W. Citrus orchard sanitation with emphasis on false codling moth control. SA Fruit J. 2008, 7, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  11. Makorere, R. An exploration of factors affecting development of citrus industry in Tanzania: Empirical evidence from Muheza District, Tanga Region. Int. J. Food Agric. Econ. 2014, 2, 135–154. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mounde, L.G.; Ateka, E.M.; Kihurani, A.W.; Wasilwa, L.; Thuranira, E.G. Occurrence and distribution of citrus gummosis (Phytophthora spp.) in Kenya. Afr. J. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 2, 315–328. [Google Scholar]
  13. Odanga, J.; Mohamed, S.; Mwalusepo, S.; Olubayo, F.; Nyankanga, R.; Khamis, F.; Rwomushana, I.; Johansson, T.; Ekesi, S. Spatial Distribution of Bactrocera dorsalis and Thaumatotibia leucotreta in Smallholder Avocado Orchards along Altitudinal Gradient of Taita Hills and Mount Kilimanjaro. Insects 2018, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brehm, G.; Fiedler, K. Faunal composition of geometrid moths changes with altitude in an Andean montane rain forest. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hilt, N.; Fiedler, K. Arctiid moth ensembles along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian montane rain forest zone: How different are subfamilies and tribes? J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ashton, L.A.; Odell, E.H.; Burwell, C.J.; Maunsell, S.C.; Nakamura, A.; McDonald, W.J.F.; Kitching, R.L. Altitudinal patterns of moth diversity in tropical and subtropical Australian rainforests. Austral. Ecology 2016, 41, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Highland, S.A.; Miller, J.C.; Jones, J.A. Determinants of moth diversity and community in a temperate mountain landscape: Vegetation, topography, and seasonality. Ecosphere 2013, 4, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Love, C.N.; Hill, M.P.; Moore, S.D. Thaumatotibia leucotreta and the Navel orange: Ovipositional preferences and host susceptibility. J. Appl. Entomol. 2014, 138, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thompson, J.N.; Pellmyr, O. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1991, 36, 65–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Daiber, C.C. A study of the biology of the false codling moth [Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.)]: The cocoon. Phytophylactica 1979, 11, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  21. Daiber, C.C. A study of the biology of the false codling moth [Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.)]: The egg. Phytophylactica 1979, 11, 129–132. [Google Scholar]
  22. Daiber, C.C. A study of the biology of the false codling moth [Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.)]: The larva. Phytophylactica 1979, 11, 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  23. De Jager, Z.M. Biology and Ecology of the False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick). Ph.D. Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moore, S.D.; Richards, G.I.; Chambers, C.; Hendry, D. An improved larval diet for commercial mass rearing of the false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Afr. Entomol. 2014, 22, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Opoku-Debrah, J.K.; Hill, M.P.; Knox, C.; Moore, S.D. Comparison of the biology of geographically distinct populations of the citrus pest, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in South Africa. Afr. Entomol. 2014, 22, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Haile, A.; Hofsvang, T. Host plant preference of the stem borer Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Prot. 2002, 21, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mkiga, A.M.; Mwatawala, M.W. Developmental Biology of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Three Cucurbitaceous Hosts at Different Temperature Regimes. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carey, J.R. Applied Demography for Biologists: With Special Emphasis on Insects; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  29. R Development Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hofmeyr, J.H.; Pringle, K.L. Resistance of false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), to the chitin synthesis inhibitor, triflumuron. Afr. Entomol. 1998, 6, 373–375. [Google Scholar]
  31. Catung, H.A. Population studies of the false codling moth, Cryptophlebia lellcolrela Meyr., on citrus in the Transvaal. Phytophylactica 1974, 6, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaenike, J. On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1978, 14, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Newton, P.J. Inversely density-dependent egg parasitism in patchy distributions of the citrus pest Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its agricultural efficiency. J. Appl. Ecol. 1988, 25, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gripenberg, S.; Mayhew, P.J.; Parnell, M.; Roslin, T. A meta-analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Muthuthantri, S.; Clarke, A.R. Five commercial citrus rate poorly as hosts of the polyphagous fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (D iptera: Tephritidae) in laboratory studies. Aust. J. Entomol. 2012, 51, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. König, M.A.; Wiklund, C.; Ehrlén, J. Butterfly oviposition preference is not related to larval performance on a polyploid herb. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 2781–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Hanif, R.; Iqbal, Z.; Iqbal, M.; Hanif, S.; Rasheed, M. Use of vegetables as nutritional food: Role in human health. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2006, 1, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  38. Eze, S.O.; Kanu, C.Q. Phytochemical and nutritive composition analysis of Solanum aethopicum L. J. Pharm. Sci. Innov. 2014, 4, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ananthan, R.; Subash, K.; Longvah, T. Assessment of nutrient composition and capsaicinoid content of some red chilies. Int. Food Nutr. Technol. 2014, 72, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  40. Traore, F.; Dabire-Binso, C.L.; Ba, N.M.; Sanon, A.; Pittendrigh, B.R. Feeding preferences of the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae and suitability of different flower parts for larval development. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2013, 33, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gould, J.; Venette, R.; Winograd, D. Effect of temperature on development and population parameters of Copitarsia decolora (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 2005, 34, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vargas, R.I.; Walsh, W.A.; Kanehisa, D.; Jang, E.B.; Armstrong, J.W. Demography of four Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared at five constant temperatures. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1997, 90, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vayssières, J.F.; Carel, Y.; Coubes, M.; Duyck, P.F. Development of immature stages and comparative demography of two cucurbit-attacking fruit flies in Reunion Island: Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus (Diptera Tephritidae). Environ. Entomol. 2008, 37, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Birch, L. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol. 1948, 17, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study sites within Machakos, Makueni and Kilifi in Kenya, Mwanza, Morogoro and Tanga in Tanzania.
Figure 1. Study sites within Machakos, Makueni and Kilifi in Kenya, Mwanza, Morogoro and Tanga in Tanzania.
Insects 10 00063 g001
Figure 2. Number of eggs laid by Thaumatotibia leucotreta on different host plants in choice (A) and no-choice (B) experiments. Boxes caped with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Figure 2. Number of eggs laid by Thaumatotibia leucotreta on different host plants in choice (A) and no-choice (B) experiments. Boxes caped with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Insects 10 00063 g002aInsects 10 00063 g002b
Figure 3. Mean development times (±SE) of Thaumatotibia leucotreta larvae (A) and pupae (B) on orange and solanaceous vegetables. Bars caped by the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Figure 3. Mean development times (±SE) of Thaumatotibia leucotreta larvae (A) and pupae (B) on orange and solanaceous vegetables. Bars caped by the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Insects 10 00063 g003
Figure 4. Mean mass (±SE) of final instar Thaumatotibia leucotreta larvae from orange and solanaceous vegetables. Bars caped with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Figure 4. Mean mass (±SE) of final instar Thaumatotibia leucotreta larvae from orange and solanaceous vegetables. Bars caped with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Insects 10 00063 g004
Figure 5. Percentage of surviving Thaumatotibia leucotreta larvae reared on orange and solanaceous vegetables. Boxes caped by the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Figure 5. Percentage of surviving Thaumatotibia leucotreta larvae reared on orange and solanaceous vegetables. Boxes caped by the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).
Insects 10 00063 g005
Figure 6. Mean (±SE) daily oviposition of Thaumatotibia leucotreta reared from orange and solanaceous host fruit.
Figure 6. Mean (±SE) daily oviposition of Thaumatotibia leucotreta reared from orange and solanaceous host fruit.
Insects 10 00063 g006
Table 1. Vegetable samples collected near citrus orchards for Thaumatotibia leucotreta incidence in mid altitude, Mlali, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Table 1. Vegetable samples collected near citrus orchards for Thaumatotibia leucotreta incidence in mid altitude, Mlali, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Village/OrchardLatitudeLongitudeVegetables Sampled Nearby the OrchardDistance from the Orchard
MlaliS06°56′55.3″E037°31′55.4″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper67–72 m
MlaliS06°56′33.6″E037°31′59.1″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper69–75 m
MlaliS06°57′20.5″E037°32′02.9″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper58–69 m
MlaliS06°57′46.8″E037°32′14.1’′Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper65–70 m
MlaliS06°57′35.2″E037°31′51.8″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper68–74 m
MkuyuniS06°58′41.9″E037°31′58.0″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper63–69 m
KiperaS06°56′14.3″E037°31′40.2″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper66–74 m
VitongaS06°57′15.9″E037°29′35.9″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper55–67 m
VitongaS06°58′36.8″E037°29′23.0″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper66–72 m
VitongaS06°57′52.4″E037°30′38.5″Sweet pepper, African eggplant, okra, chili pepper56–63 m
Table 2. Percentage of fruit with Thaumatotibia leucotreta damage symptoms (A) and larvae (B) sampled from the ground and from trees (with and without branch shaking) at the respective altitudes in Kenya and Tanzania.
Table 2. Percentage of fruit with Thaumatotibia leucotreta damage symptoms (A) and larvae (B) sampled from the ground and from trees (with and without branch shaking) at the respective altitudes in Kenya and Tanzania.
ParameterAltitudeFruit Sampling MethodCountryAverage
KenyaTanzania
A% fruit with damage symptoms>1201 maslGround42.16 ± 3.40 h33.92 ± 3.05 fgh38.04 ± 2.29 e
Tree without shaking12.72 ± 1.69 bcd9.36 ± 1.35 bc11.04 ± 1.10 b
Tree shaking28.48 ± 2.88 fg22.08 ± 2.12 def25.28 ± 1.75 c
501–1200 maslGround40.24 ± 2.28 gh28.58 ± 2.72 fgh34.38 ± 1.91 de
Tree without shaking7.72 ± 1.26 abc5.52 ± 1.96 bc6.62 ± 0.80 a
Tree branch shaking27.56 ± 2.20 efg21.40 ± 1.95 def24.48 ± 1.49 c
0–500 maslGround35.88 ± 1.87 gh21.76 ± 2.49 def28.82 ± 1.82 cd
Tree without shaking5.76 ± 1.21 ab2.88 ± 0.76 a4.32 ± 0.74 a
Tree shaking16.08 ± 1.82 cde14.16 ± 1.69 cd15.12 ± 1.21 b
Average24.07A17.73B
B% Larval infested fruit
>1201 maslGround33.26 ± 3.59 efg21.00 ± 2.75 cde27.12 ± 2.41de
Tree without shaking16.00 ± 0.99 bcd12.08 ± 0.75 abc14.04 ± 0.68 bc
Tree shaking46.48 ± 4.38 g41.80 ± 3.69 fg44.14 ± 2.85 g
501–1200 maslGround29.00 ± 3.02 def16.40 ± 1.84 bcd22.62 ± 1.96 cd
Tree without shaking14.93 ± 1.27 bc8.96 ± 0.63 abc11.90 ± 0.82 ab
Tree shaking45.04 ± 3.75 g37.44 ± 3.75 fg41.24 ± 2.64 fg
0–500 maslGround15.46 ± 1.80 bc11.44 ± 1.27 abc13.40 ± 1.13 b
Tree without shaking8.27 ± 0.83 ab4.92 ± 0.49 a6.64 ± 0.54 a
Tree shaking34.24 ± 3.99 efg33.00 ± 3.78 efg33.62 ±2.72 ef
Average26.93A20.79B
Means for Thaumatotibia leucotetra damage symptoms and larval incidence in the same column followed by the same lower-case letter and means within a row followed by the same upper case letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD).
Table 3. Mean percentage of Thaumatotibia leucotreta larval infested vegetables sampled from fields near orange orchards in the mid-altitude growing region of Tanzania.
Table 3. Mean percentage of Thaumatotibia leucotreta larval infested vegetables sampled from fields near orange orchards in the mid-altitude growing region of Tanzania.
Host PlantScientific NamePercentage Infestation
OkraAbelmoschus esculentus3.08 ± 0.90 a
Sweet pepperCapsicum spp.8.72 ± 1.81 b
African eggplantSolanum aethiopicum12.00 ± 1.46 b
Chili pepperCapsicum spp.10.96 ± 1.28 b
Means within the column followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD).
Table 4. Sex ratio, oviposition, female longevity, male longevity and fecundity of Thaumatotibia leucotreta reared on orange and solanaceous vegetables.
Table 4. Sex ratio, oviposition, female longevity, male longevity and fecundity of Thaumatotibia leucotreta reared on orange and solanaceous vegetables.
ParameterHost Plant
OrangeSweet PepperAfrican EggplantChili Pepper
* Sex ratio (male: female)0.38:0.620.32:0.680.37:0.630.34:0.66
* Pre-oviposition period1.20 ± 0.081.21 ± 0.091.17 ± 0.121.23 ± 0.06
* Oviposition period8.00 ± 0.47.75 ± 0.298.00 ± 0.417.75 ± 0.25
* Female longevity (days)16.02 ± 0.8916.21 ± 0.7116.61 ± 0.7315.90 ± 0.82
* Male longevity (days)15.67 ± 0.6915.34 ± 0.6015.51 ± 0.9015.61 ± 0.81
Fecundity415.00 ± 3.70c341.00 ± 5.37a378.00 ± 8.03b364.00 ± 3.53b
Means followed by the same letter within the row for fecundity are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD), * No significant difference between hosts.
Table 5. Pairwise comparison on mean number of eggs laid by Thaumatotibia leucotreta reared from orange and solanaceous fruit on three peak days of egg laying.
Table 5. Pairwise comparison on mean number of eggs laid by Thaumatotibia leucotreta reared from orange and solanaceous fruit on three peak days of egg laying.
OrangeChili PepperAfrican EggplantSweet Pepper
Day 3
Orange-0.8231.0000.460
Chili pepper-0.8290.928
African eggplant-0.459
Day 4
Orange-0.0030.0090.001
Chili pepper-0.9880.822
African eggplant-0.630
Day 5
Orange-0.68150.1770.010
Chili pepper-1.0000.182
African eggplant-0.177
p-Values indicating significant differences are in bold (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).
Table 6. Life history parameters of Thaumatotibia leucotreta recovered from orange and solanaceous vegetables.
Table 6. Life history parameters of Thaumatotibia leucotreta recovered from orange and solanaceous vegetables.
ParameterHost Plant
OrangeSweet PepperAfrican EggplantChili Pepper
Net reproductive rate419.7 ± 3.844c348.00 ± 5.484a385.90 ± 7.722b371.5 ± 3.611b
* Mean generation time48.19 ± 1.10348.90 ± 1.30147.29 ± 0.80748.42 ± 0.261
* Intrinsic rate of increase0.13 ± 0.0020.12 ± 0.0030.13 ± 0.0020.12 ± 0.001
* Doubling time5.53 ± 0.1285.79 ± 0.1625.50 ± 0.0865.67 ± 0.024
* Finite rate of increase1.40 ± 0.0021.13 ± 0.0041.13 ± 0.0021.12 ± 0.002
Means followed by the same letter within the row indicating the net reproductive rate are not significantly different (p = 0.05, Tukey’s HSD), * No significant difference between hosts.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mkiga, A.M.; Mohamed, S.A.; du Plessis, H.; Khamis, F.M.; Ekesi, S. Field and Laboratory Performance of False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Troticidae) on Orange and Selected Vegetables. Insects 2019, 10, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030063

AMA Style

Mkiga AM, Mohamed SA, du Plessis H, Khamis FM, Ekesi S. Field and Laboratory Performance of False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Troticidae) on Orange and Selected Vegetables. Insects. 2019; 10(3):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mkiga, Abdullah Mohamed, Samira Abuelgasim Mohamed, Hannalene du Plessis, Fathiya Mbarak Khamis, and Sunday Ekesi. 2019. "Field and Laboratory Performance of False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Troticidae) on Orange and Selected Vegetables" Insects 10, no. 3: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030063

APA Style

Mkiga, A. M., Mohamed, S. A., du Plessis, H., Khamis, F. M., & Ekesi, S. (2019). Field and Laboratory Performance of False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Troticidae) on Orange and Selected Vegetables. Insects, 10(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop