Next Article in Journal
Systematics Review and Phylogeny of Cyrtophyllitinae Zeuner, 1935 sensu Gorochov, Jarzembowski & Coram, 2006 (Ensifera, Haglidae), with Description of Two New Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ephestia kuehniella Eggs on Development and Transcriptome of the Ladybird Beetle Propylea japonica
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Characterization of Three Novel Solemo-like Viruses in the White-Backed Planthopper, Sogatella furcifera
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Consumptive Effects of Harmonia axyridis on the Reproduction and Metabolism of Spodoptera frugiperda

1
Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
School of Biology and Agriculture, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation of Food and Medicinal Resources in Northern Region, Shaoguan 512005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2024, 15(6), 395; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060395
Submission received: 27 April 2024 / Revised: 26 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 28 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Evolution of Ladybird Beetles in Biological Control)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigated the non-consumptive effects of Harmonia axyridis on the reproduction and physiological status of Spodoptera frugiperda. We observed that, even in the absence of predation, the mere presence of H. axyridis led to a reduction in the number of eggs laid by S. frugiperda adults. This reduction was attributed to the induction of stress responses in S. frugiperda, characterized by inflammatory reactions and increased levels of antioxidant enzymes. Alterations in energy allocation occurred, resulting in decreased allocation towards hormone production and vitellogenin synthesis, ultimately leading to diminished fecundity. Our findings underscore the intricate mechanisms through which predators can impact pest populations within agricultural ecosystems.

Abstract

An increasing body of research has underscored the significant impact of non-consumptive effects on the dynamics of prey pests, encompassing growth, development, reproduction, and metabolism across various vertebrate and invertebrate taxa, rivaling the influence of consumption effects. In our investigation, we delved into the non-consumptive effects exerted by the natural predatory enemy Harmonia axyridis on the reproductive capacity and metabolism of Spodoptera frugiperda adults. Our findings revealed a substantial decrease in the reproductive ability of S. frugiperda adults when exposed to the non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis. Concurrently, we observed an elevation in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content and the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutases (SODs), catalases (CATs), and peroxidases (PODs). Furthermore, notable alterations were detected in energy metabolism, characterized by heightened triglyceride levels and diminished glycogen and trehalose concentrations. These outcomes underscored the adaptive response of the pest aimed at mitigating non-consumptive adverse effects by augmenting antioxidant enzyme activity to counteract oxidative stress and minimize cellular damage. Nonetheless, this defensive mechanism entails a significant expenditure of energy resources, resulting in shifts in energy utilization. Elevated triglyceride levels and reduced glycogen and trehalose concentrations diminish available resources for reproductive processes, such as egg laying, ultimately culminating in decreased fecundity. This study contributes novel insights into the non-consumptive effects observed in insects, while also furnishing valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying insect stress responses.

1. Introduction

Insects represent one of the most abundant and diverse animal groups on Earth, possessing remarkable adaptability, fecundity, diverse food sources, and multiple modes of spread, collectively contributing to their exceptional survival and stress resistance capabilities [1]. However, their habitats expose them not only to various abiotic stressors, but also to biological stressors [2,3,4]. Abiotic stress primarily arises from environmental factors and human activities, including climate change, environmental pollution, habitat instability, and heavy metal contamination [5,6,7]. In addition to abiotic stressors, insects also face pressures from the biological world, such as predation pressure [8].
There is substantial evidence indicating that non-consumptive effects can induce changes in insect behavior or morphology [9,10], alter the life history of insects [11], and trigger insect immune defense responses and antioxidant responses [12,13]. Moreover, the non-consumptive effects of predatory insects can initiate a trophic cascade by diminishing the feeding and fitness of prey insects [14,15]. It is widely recognized that the non-consumptive effects of natural predatory enemies play a significant role in the detrimental impacts of insect predators on prey insects [16]. In the presence of predators, prey insects typically exhibit defensive behaviors, such as decreasing foraging efficiency and altering foraging behavior, leading to reduced feeding time and decreased adaptability to the pests’ environment [17]. Prey insects are not passive victims of predators. They can detect the presence of natural enemies and employ various cues to continuously adjust their behavior and physiological functions to evade encounters with predators and avoid predation [18]. Therefore, the impact of non-consumptive effects is regarded as an integral aspect of biological pest control strategies [19]. For example, in the case of the leaf-feeding female Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), when adult Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) are present, the female citrus psyllid secretes less honeydew and reduces deposition and oviposition on plants where ladybirds are detected [20]. Non-consumptive effects can have positive outcomes for prey survival, i.e., changes in prey behavior and physiology that can aid in predation avoidance, while there may also be negative consequences, including increased stress and reduced growth, and even these effects can cascade through trophic systems influencing ecosystem function [15,21]. When prey insects are affected by the non-consumptive effects of natural enemies, there is an increase in metabolic rates in physiological responses and the diversion of energy from other body functions (including antioxidant defense), resulting in elevated oxidative stress [21]. In addition, the reproduction of prey insects can be negatively impacted, leading to reduced reproductive success rates or altered reproductive behavior [22].
Spodoptera frugiperda is a major agricultural migratory pest originating from the tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas [23]. Due to its polyphagia and strong adaptability, it has rapidly expanded after invading China, causing serious losses in food production [24]. Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) is not only a well-known aphid predator [25], but also the potential natural predatory enemy of S. frugiperda [26]. It has been regarded as a biological control agent [27], which can utilize the perceived sex pheromone of S. frugiperda to locate its habitat [28]. However, in addition to the predation ability of H. axyridis, little is known about its effects on the biological performance and physiological metabolic function of S. frugiperda through non-consumptive effects. In the current study, we investigated the non-consumptive effects of the predatory insect H. axyridis on the reproduction, hormones, antioxidant enzymes and energy-related macronutrients of S. frugiperda adults. Based on our research findings, we speculate that the non-consumptive effect of H. axyridis affects the biological performance of S. frugiperda by influencing the aforementioned physiological indicators. The results of this study may contribute to the further development and effective implementation of biological pest control strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants and Insects

In this study, maize plants were utilized to rear S. frugiperda. Maize seeds (Zhongnong sweet maize 488) were planted in plastic pots measuring 18 cm in diameter and 12 cm × 20 cm in height, filled with a soil and sand mixture comprising 10% sand, 5% clay, and 85% peat. These plants were reared under controlled conditions, excluding other arthropods, and were used in experiments once the maize leaves reached a height of 70–80 cm.
S. frugiperda larvae were collected from a maize field in Huadu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China, in May 2022. They were subsequently reared on maize plants within a growth chamber (26 ± 1 °C, L/D 14:10 photoperiod, 60–90% photoperiod) for experimental use.
The natural predatory enemy, H. axyridis, was reared in the laboratory of the Research Center of the Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University (SCAU). H. axyridis populations were maintained on pea aphid as their primary food source. Prior to the commencement of the experiment, H. axyridis individuals were fed with S. frugiperda 2nd instar larvae for three consecutive generations to acclimate them to this prey species.

2.2. Experimental Setup

In this study, a double-space transparent plastic container (Figure 1) (10 cm diameter and 15 cm height) was utilized as the experimental apparatus. A transparent nylon net (100 mesh cm−2) was used to separate the inside of the insect box into two parts. One space of the insect box contained honey water as sustenance for S. frugiperda, while H. axyridis was introduced to threaten S. frugiperda adults in the other space. However, due to the nylon net barrier, the ladybirds were unable to access the other space, resulting in only non-consumptive effects occurring in these experiments.

2.3. Non-Consumptive Effects of the H. axyridis on S. frugiperda Reproduction

In order to detect the reproduction of S. frugiperda adults under the non-consumptive effect of H. axyridis, we introduced one unmated pair of female and male S. frugiperda adults into one space of the insect box and introduced four H. axyridis adults, within 3 days of eclosion and starved for 24 h, into the other space. After three days of exposure to the threat, the ladybirds were removed. During the stress treatment period, new ladybirds were replaced daily. Throughout the experiment, 8% honey water was provided to S. frugiperda adults as sustenance, with fresh honey water replaced daily. Gauze was placed under the lid to serve as a substrate for egg laying. The number of eggs produced was counted daily by shaking them off the gauze. The number of eggs was counted daily until all adults had died. Each adult pair constituted a replicate, with a total of 30 replicates being used. A box with moths but without ladybirds was used as the control.

2.4. Sample Preparation and Physiological Indicator Content Determination

Additionally, a stress experiment was set up as described above to measure the activities of the antioxidant enzymes and energy-related macronutrients. After three days of exposing S. frugiperda to H. axyridis, the female S. frugiperda were collected in a petri dish and promptly frozen at −20 °C for 10 min to halt biological activity. Subsequently, they were carefully placed on a microscope slide for dissection in 1× PBS buffer (PH 7.4). During dissection, one dissecting needle gently pressed the dorsal plate of the thorax, while the other needle held the external genitalia at the end of the abdomen and delicately pulled them outwards. This method facilitated the removal of the attached digestive system and body fat while preserving the integrity of the ovaries. Six female adults were collected per sample. The ovaries of S. frugiperda were then weighed and subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen before being ground into fine powder. Then, the crude homogenate was obtained in PBS (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully collected and stored at −80 °C until further analysis of the physiological indicator content determination. Protein extraction and measurement were conducted following to the manufacturer’s instructions within the commercially available assay kits from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Additionally, the activities of the antioxidant enzymes (H2O2, SODs, PODs, and CATs) and energy-related macronutrients (triglyceride, trehalose, and glycogen) were measured according to the manufacturer ’s instructions for each test kit obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China. Each treatment or control trial included three replications to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the results.

2.5. Data Analysis

Data analyses were conducted using SAS software (v.8.01). Prior to applying parametric tests, data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilks test and for homogeneity of variance using Levene’s test. Differences in fecundity, hormone levels, antioxidant enzyme activity, and energy substance content of S. frugiperda adults among different treatments were analyzed using the t-test. The Duncan test was employed for post hoc analysis to distinguish significant differences in mean values. Data were represented by mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). In the figures, asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Graphs were generated using Graphpad Prism 5 (Graphpad, La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Non-Consumptive Effects of Natural Predatory Enemies on the Biology of S. frugiperda

As shown in Figure 2, the number of eggs laid by S. frugiperda exhibited a significant decrease compared to that in the control group (1098.5 ± 168.41) when the S. frugiperda adults were exposed to the non-consumptive effect (845.37 ± 157.4) (t58 = 6.02, p < 0.0001). It can be seen that in the presence of H. axyridis, the fecundity of S. frugiperda was significantly reduced due to non-consumptive effects.

3.2. Non-Consumptive Effects of S. frugiperda Adults on Hormone Activities and VTG Content

The non-consumptive effect of H. axyridis markedly influenced the activities of ecdysones (ECRs), juvenile hormones (JHs), and vitellogenin (VTG) in S. frugiperda adults. Following exposure to non-consumptive effects, the ECR activity significantly decreased by 29.48% (t4 = 3.35, p = 0.0285) (Figure 3A), the juvenile hormone significantly decreased by 36.03% (t4 = 4.93, p = 0.0079) (Figure 3B), and the VTG content significantly down-regulated by 16.14% (t4 = 7.06, p = 0.0021) (Figure 3C) compared to those in the control group. These results indicated that the non-consumptive effects induced changes in hormone and vitellogenin content in S. frugiperda adults.
After exposure to the non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis, the activities of the H2O2 and antioxidant enzymes (CATs, SODs, and PODs) in S. frugiperda adults exhibited significant changes, as depicted in Figure 4. H2O2 activity was significantly up-regulated by 39.11% (t4 = −4.38, p = 0.008) (Figure 4A) under the non-consumptive effect compared to that in the control group. The non-consumptive effect of H. axyridis positively influenced the activity of the antioxidant enzymes in S. frugiperda. Specifically, the activities of the CATs significantly increased by 37.43% (t4 = −8.21, p = 0.0012) (Figure 4B), and the activities of the PODs significantly increased by 54.82% (t4 = −10.26, p =0.0005) (Figure 4C). However, the activity of the SODs did not exhibit significant change (t4 = 1.52, p = 0.2031) (Figure 4D). These results indicated that in the presence of H. axyridis, the content of reactive oxygen species (ROS), namely H2O2, increased in S. frugiperda due to the non-consumptive effects. In order to counteract the oxidative damage caused by the non-consumptive effects, the activities of the antioxidant enzymes (CATs and PODs) in S. frugiperda were significantly up-regulated.
In Figure 5, the non-consumptive effect of H. axyridis had a significant effect on the energy-related macronutrients in S. frugiperda adults. After exposure to non-consumptive effects, the glycogen in the prey was significantly reduced by 42.62% (t4 = 8.2, p =0.001) (Figure 5A). Although the protein content increased under the non-consumptive effect, the difference did not reach a significant level (t4 = −2.66, p = 0.0563) (Figure 5B). Moreover, compared with the control groups, the trehalose content in S. frugiperda adults was significantly reduced by 20.68% (t4 = 2.78, p = 0.0497) (Figure 5C). In addition, the triglyceride content in the prey was significantly increased by 11.41% (t4 = −3.22, p = 0.0322) (Figure 5D). Our results revealed that the non-consumptive effect subsequently influenced energy-related macronutrients within the S. frugiperda adults’ bodies. Specifically, the triglyceride content significantly increased, moreover, while the trehalose and glycogen content decreased in the prey under the non-consumptive effect.

4. Discussion

Non-consumptive effects of predators on prey are an important topic in insect ecology. Non-consumptive effects have the potential to alter host prey survival, reproduction, population growth, and so on [29,30,31]. For example, when Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) was faced with the non-consumptive effects of the natural enemy Notonecta sellata (Heteroptera: Notonectidae), immature C. pipiens developed slowly, adult reproduction was affected and delayed, and the reproduction rate was also significantly reduced [22]. Similarly, Wen and Ueno (2021) found that when Laodelphax striatellus Fallén (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) was exposed to an environment with cues of natural enemies Paederus fuscipes Curtis (Coleoptera: Staphilinidae), the development and reproductive performance of L. striatellus adults deteriorated, and the number of eggs laid also decreased [32]. Moreover, when fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster adults were exposed to the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), D. melanogaster adults were able to recognize younger wasps as a higher level of threat and consequently depress the oviposition to reduce the risk of parasitism in their offspring, yet D. melanogaster did not show a defense response to old parasitoids [10]. Our study also revealed that S. frugiperda adults significantly decreased their fecundity when exposed to H. axyridis.
Besides reproductive changes, physiological changes may also occur in prey exposed to non-consumptive effect. Juvenile hormones (JH) and ecdysone (20E) are crucial regulators in insect growth and reproduction, and jointly regulate the metamorphosis development of insects [33]. The titers of JH and 20E within insects are affected by various external factors, including temperature, chemical agents, ultraviolet radiation, and heavy metal stress [34,35,36]. For example, different temperatures and photoperiods significantly affected JH titer in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [37]. Additionally, exposure to cadmium changed the larval body size and weight of D. melanogaster, prolonged the pupation and eclosion time, and disrupted the level of JH and 20E [38]. Meanwhile, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) exposed to non-consumptive effects showed elevated levels of JH and 20E to varying extents, and the increase in the JH titers enhanced the reproductive activities of adults, while the increase in 20E titers promoted the immune activities of adults [39]. Vitellogenin synthesis is fundamental for vitellogenesis, egg maturation, and embryonic development, directly impacting insects’ fertility, and vitellogenin also plays non-nutritional roles by functioning as immune-relevant molecules and antioxidant reagents [40]. JH regulates vitellin synthesis, oocyte maturation, and the uptake of ooxanthine by oocytes [41]. 20E, a steroid hormone synthesized and secreted by the insect’s prothoracic gland, is vital for regulating growth, development, metabolism, and reproduction [42]. In our study, we found that the non-consumptive effect of natural enemies resulted in reduced levels of JH, 20E, and vitellogenin. We speculated this was the reason for decreasing the fecundity of S. frugiperda.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), as important signal molecules within organisms, have an essential role in various physiological processes [43]. When organisms experience stress, a large amount of endogenous ROS will be produced [44]. Failure to effectively counteract these ROS can lead to significant damage to essential cells and disrupt normal development in insects [43]. In response to rapid ROS accumulation, insects activate an antioxidant defense mechanism, including the increased activity of antioxidant enzymes, to mitigate oxidative damage and maintain cellular homeostasis [45]. For example, studies on the tarantula Pardosa pseudoannulata (Araneae: Lycosidae) have shown increased activities of antioxidant enzymes (such as peroxidases, superoxide dismutases, and catalases) in response to cadmium exposure, indicating their vital role in antioxidant defense [46]. Similarly, when Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: aphididae) was exposed to the non-consumptive effects of the ladybird Cheilomenes sexmaculata (F.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), the level of antioxidant enzymes (SODs and CATs) increased in the body in a short period of time, helping to counteract the oxidative damage induced by elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) content [47]. Therefore, when S. frugiperda adults were exposed to the non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis, the content of H2O2 in their bodies increased, indicating the development of severe oxidative stress. In order to reduce the oxidative damage caused by ROS, the levels of antioxidant enzymes (CATs and PODs) increased in S. frugiperda.
Exposed to non-consumptive effects, prey may experience stress and respond physiologically by altering their metabolic rates [48]. Triglycerides (TGs) are the main storage form of lipids in the body fat of insects [49], playing a crucial role as an energy source [50]. Similarly, protein mainly synthesized in the body fat is an important basis for insect life substances, and the various life activities of the organism have its participation [51]. Polysaccharides, including trehalose and glycogen, represent the main carbohydrate forms in insects, storing indispensable nutrients and energy while also participating in the metabolism process [51,52,53]. A study by Kaplan et al. [54] showed that when prey organisms were exposed to the presence of predatory insects, their body fat content increased as an adaptive response to store energy, but when the risk subsided, they would convert energy into use. The General Stress Paradigm (GSP) predicts that non-consumptive effects activate physiological stress responses in prey causing diversion of resources away from growth, development, and reproduction to maintain a higher metabolic state [55]. In a prior study, the C content of Melanoplus femurrubrum (DeGeer) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) did not change significantly when the species was exposed to chronic non-consumptive effects, but body C/N ratios increased when reared under chronic predation because they increased N excretion [55]. Similarly, Redinger et al. (2022) [56] explored how the elemental and macronutrient content along with the morphology of three abundant Ozark glade grasshopper species differed between glades with and without predatory collared lizard populations, and their results indicated that lichen grasshoppers (Trimerotropis saxatilis) increased body C/N ratios in response to predators to heighten metabolism. However, the water flea Daphnia magna accelerated growth rates in the presence of a fish predator, reducing their C/N body composition ratios by investing in higher fecundity [57]. In our study, when S. frugiperda adults were exposed to the non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis, there was a significant decrease in the level of glycogen and trehalose in the body, accompanied by an increase in the level of triglyceride (TG). These results indicated that after S. frugiperda adults were stressed by H. axyridis, a part of the carbohydrates in the body was converted into fat to maintain the energy and nutrient supply required for life activities. These discrepancies were likely due to different taxa adopting different strategies in response to non-consumptive effects. These adaptive metabolic responses underscore the dynamic interplay between energy storage and utilization in insects facing stress.
To foster the non-consumptive effects of predators that may lead to pest suppression, it is essential to understand what influences prey perception of risk. Cues that induce prey perception of risk may be chemical, with both non-volatile (cuticular hydrocarbons) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) being used by prey to detect predator presence [29]. For example, small brown planthopper Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) adults exposed to predator cues or predator body extracts of Paederus fuscipes Curtis gained less weight and laid fewer eggs [32]. Prey can also use tactile and visual cues to sense predator presences [14] or distinguish vibrational cues from predators vs. non-predators [58]. For example, the tympanic membranes of nocturnal moths can detect bat-like ultrasound frequencies from 10 to 100 kHz, but they are better at detecting frequencies between 20 and 50 kHz [59]. And fruit fly D. melanogaster adults perceived parasitic wasps primarily by visual cues [10]. In this study, we utilized double-space transparent plastic containers separated by a transparent nylon net, allowing S. frugiperda to sense H. axyridis through chemical and visual cues. However, further experiments are needed to determine which cue was crucial.
In summary, the interplay between predators and prey has been a central focus of scientific inquiry within the realm of natural ecosystems over recent decades [60]. A trade-off between reproduction and immunity may occur in insects. An increase in immune function could lead to a decrease in reproductive activity due to the allocation of lesser energy to reproduction, and conversely, infection and activation of the immune system could reduce reproductive output [61]. There was a tradeoff between reproduction and immunity in S. litura when exposed to non-consumptive effects, and energy was preferentially allocated to immunity, resulting in decreased reproductive activity and fecundity [39]. In our study, non-consumptive effects led to increased antioxidant enzyme activity, heightened carbohydrate consumption, and decreased fecundity. These findings aligned with previous studies. We speculated that when S. frugiperda was exposed to non-consumptive effects, there was induced oxidative stress and cellular damage in the body, prompting an increase in antioxidant enzyme activity to mitigate these injuries. However, the synthesis of these enzymes demanded a significant allocation of energy resources. Consequently, S. frugiperda may modulate its metabolic pathways, resulting in heightened consumption of carbohydrate substances. Moreover, to ensure survival in adverse conditions, it may convert surplus energy into fat for long-term storage and energy reserves. This reallocation of resources consequently diminished the energy available for hormone synthesis. Consequently, levels of hormones, including juvenile hormone (JH) and 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) decreased, leading to reduced synthesis of vitellogenin. As a consequence, the fecundity of S. frugiperda adults diminished. In short, a tradeoff between reproduction and immunity was observed in S. frugiperda, where energy was preferentially allocated to immunity, resulting in a decrease in fecundity.
Understanding the indirect consumption relationship between natural enemies and their prey is crucial for optimizing the potential of biological pest control [16,62]. Traditional screening of biological control agents often focuses solely on the consumptive abilities of natural enemies. However, non-consumptive effects can significantly induce behavioral, physiological, morphological, and life-history changes in their prey, potentially leading to notable shifts in population and community dynamics [63]. Many studies have discovered that even when natural enemies kill relatively few prey or hosts, they can exert substantial impacts through non-consumptive effects [64,65,66]. Non-consumptive effects may function as effective biological control agents over a larger spatial scale, as pests can detect the presence of a predator from a distance and may move to avoid them, thereby reducing crop damage [16]. Non-consumptive effects can also be directly harnessed for biological control. For example, bat ultrasound has been shown to effectively control agricultural pests, such as armyworms and desert locusts by deterring their intrusion into crop fields [67]. Similarly, in another system, non-volatile cues such as the physical presence of silk collected from the spider predator Tetragnatha elongata (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) have been found to reduce plant damage by Japanese beetle Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and Mexican bean beetle Epilachna varivestis (Coleóptera: Goccinellidae) prey [68]. In addition, longevity was shorter and fecundity and weight gain were lower when small brown planthoppers L. striatellus were exposed to predator P. fuscipes body extracts, indicating the possible application of these extracts for pest control [32]. In conclusion, advancements in this field will enhance our understanding of insect stress responses and provide targeted recommendations for the application and refinement of biological control strategies. Future efforts should aim to maximize both the consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predators to achieve more effective biological control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.F. and X.L.; funding acquisition, C.M. and H.Y.; methodology, Z.F. and X.L.; software, Z.F., X.L. and W.K.; validation, W.K., X.L. and Y.H.; writing—original draft, Z.F., Y.H. and H.Y.; writing—review and editing, Z.F., C.M. and H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Province key construction discipline research ability improvement project, grant number 2022ZDJS047.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yi-Han Li (USA) for her critical review on the earlier version of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mayhew, P.J. Why are there so many insect species? Perspectives from Fossils and Phylogenies. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2007, 82, 425–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cinel, S.D.; Hahn, D.A.; Kawahara, A.Y. Predator-induced stress responses in insects: A review. J. Insect Physiol. 2020, 122, 104039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gely, C.; Laurance, S.G.W.; Stork, N.E. How do herbivorous insects respond to drought stress in trees? Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2020, 95, 434–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sinclair, B.J.; Ferguson, L.V.; Salehipour-shirazi, G.; MacMillan, H.A. Cross-tolerance and cross-talk in the cold: Relating low temperatures to desiccation and immune stress in insects. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2013, 53, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Halsch, C.A.; Shapiro, A.M.; Fordyce, J.A.; Nice, C.C.; Thorne, J.H.; Waetjen, D.P.; Forister, M.L. Insects and recent climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2002543117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kaitala, A. Wing muscle dimorphism: Two reproductive pathways of the waterstrider Gerris thoracicus in relation to habitat instability. Oikos 1988, 53, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nummelin, M.; Lodenius, M.; Tulisalo, E.; Hirvonen, H.; Alanko, T. Predatory insects as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 145, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Roels, S.M.; Porter, J.L.; Lindell, C.A. Predation pressure by birds and arthropods on herbivorous insects affected by tropical forest restoration strategy. Restor. Ecol. 2018, 26, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alomar, A.A.; Alto, B.W. Mosquito responses to lethal and nonlethal effects of predation and an insect growth regulator. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pang, L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, J.; Dong, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, J. Search performance and octopamine neuronal signaling mediate parasitoid induced changes in Drosophila oviposition behavior. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elliott, K.H.; Betini, G.S.; Dworkin, I.; Norris, D.R. Experimental evidence for within- and cross-seasonal effects of fear on survival and reproduction. J. Anim. Ecol. 2016, 85, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sheriff, M.J.; Peacor, S.D.; Hawlena, D.; Thaker, M. Non-consumptive predator effects on prey population size: A dearth of evidence. J. Anim. Ecol. 2020, 89, 1302–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, J.; Bai, Y. Predator-induced stress influences fall armyworm immune response to inoculating bacteria. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 172, 107352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hermann, S.L.; Landis, D.A. Scaling up our understanding of non-consumptive effects in insect systems. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 20, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jandricic, S.E.; Schmidt, D.; Bryant, G.; Frank, S.D. Non-consumptive predator effects on a primary greenhouse pest: Predatory mite harassment reduces western flower thrips abundance and plant damage. Biol. Control 2016, 95, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thaler, J.S.; Griffin, C.A.M. Relative importance of consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predators on prey and plant damage: The influence of herbivore ontogeny. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2008, 128, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dupuy, M.M.; Ramirez, R.A. Consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predatory arthropods on billbug (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) pests in turfgrass. Biol. Control 2019, 129, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Norris, R.H.; Silva-Torres, C.S.A.; Lujan, M.; Wilson-Rankin, E.E.; Mauck, K.E. Footprints of predatory lady beetles stimulate increased dispersal of aphid prey, but do not alter feeding behavior or spread of a non-persistently transmitted plant virus. Food Webs. 2023, 37, e00325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Preisser, E.L.; Bolnick, D.I. The many faces of fear: Comparing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey populations. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seo, M.; Rivera, M.J.; Stelinski, L.L. Trail chemicals of the convergens ladybird beetle, Hippodamia Convergens, Reduce feeding and oviposition by Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) on citrus plants. J. Insect Behav. 2018, 31, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Janssens, L.; Stoks, R. Predation risk causes oxidative damage in prey. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9, 20130350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fischer, S.; Pereyra, D.; Fernández, L. Predation ability and non-consumptive effects of Notonecta sellata (Heteroptera: Notonectidae) on immature stages of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Vector Ecol. 2012, 37, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ashley, T.R.; Wiseman, B.R.; Davis, F.M.; Andrews, K.L. The fall armyworm: A bibliography. Fla. Entomol. 1989, 72, 152–202. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, C.; Liao, J.; Ya, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Yu, G. Analysis of potential distribution of Spodoptera frugiperda in western China. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2022, 25, 101985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koch, R.L. The multicolored asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis: A review of its biology, uses in biological control, and non-target impacts. J. Insect Sci. 2003, 3, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Di, N.; Zhang, K.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Harwood, J.D.; Wang, S.; Desneux, N. Predatory ability of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) for suppression of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 2021, 12, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lin, K.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, C.; Mao, J.; Che, H.; Zhang, L. Predation of Hippodamia variegata and Harmonia axyridis to young larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 35, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhan, Y.; Wang, J.; Kong, X.; Liu, Y. Perception and kairomonal response of the coccinellid predator (Harmonia Axyridis) to the fall armyworm (Spodoptera Frugiperda) sex pheromone. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1167174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hermann, S.L.; Thaler, J.S. Prey Perception of predation risk: Volatile chemical cues mediate non-consumptive effects of a predator on a herbivorous insect. Oecologia 2014, 176, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McCauley, S.J.; Rowe, L.; Fortin, M.J. The deadly effects of “nonlethal” predators. Ecology 2011, 92, 2043–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zanette, L.Y.; White, A.F.; Allen, M.C.; Clinchy, M. Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. Science 2011, 334, 1398–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wen, J.; Ueno, T. Application of predator-associated cues to control small brown planthoppers: Non-consumptive effects of predators suppress the pest population. BioControl 2021, 66, 813–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Song, J.; Zhou, S. Post-transcriptional regulation of insect metamorphosis and oogenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 1893–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chang, Y.W.; Wang, Y.C.; Yan, Y.Q.; Wu, C.D.; Xie, H.F.; Gong, W.R.; Du, Y.Z. Insect hormones affect the toxicity of the insecticidal growth regulator cyromazine in Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sang, W.; Yu, L.; He, L.; Ma, W.H.; Zhu, Z.H.; Zhu, F.; Wang, X.P.; Lei, C.L. Uvb radiation delays Tribolium castaneum metamorphosis by influencing ecdysteroid metabolism. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, M.; Li, G.; Yu, L.; Du, S.; Jiang, D.; Chu, X.; Wang, K.; Wu, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, F.; et al. Temperature and metal ions regulate larval diapause termination via the 20-hydroxyecdysone and juvenile hormone pathways in Monochamus alternatus. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2023, 79, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, X.; Coll, M.; Applebaum, S.W. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on juvenile hormone biosynthesis and sexual maturation in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera: Implications for life history traits. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 30, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mu, Y.; Hu, X.; Yang, P.; Sun, L.; Gu, W.; Zhang, M. The effects of cadmium on the development of Drosophila and its transgenerational inheritance effects. Toxicology 2021, 462, 152931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lin, T.; Feng, J.; Jiang, T. Effects of predation risks of bats on the growth, development, reproduction, and hormone levels of Spodoptera litura. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1126253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.; Zhang, S. Functions of vitellogenin in eggs. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2017, 63, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhai, Q.H.; Zhang, J.Z.; Gong, H. Regulation of vitellogenin synthesis by juvenile hormone analogue in Coccinella septempunctata. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1987, 17, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qi, H.; Cao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, Y.; Jin, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Deng, D. Cloning and functional analysis of the molting gene Cyp302a1 of Daphnia sinensis. Front. Zool. 2023, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Herb, M.; Schramm, M. Functions of ros in macrophages and antimicrobial immunity. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Woolley, J.F.; Stanicka, J.; Cotter, T.G. Recent advances in reactive oxygen species measurement in biological systems. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013, 38, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Orčić, S.; Nikolić, T.; Purać, J.; Šikoparija, B.; Blagojević, D.P.; Vukašinović, E.; Plavša, N.; Stevanović, J.; Kojić, D. Seasonal variation in the activity of selected antioxidant enzymes and malondialdehyde level in worker honey bees. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2017, 165, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; He, Y.; Peng, X.; Bo, L.; Wang, Z.; Song, Q. Characterization of cadmium-responsive transcription factors in wolf spider Pardosa pseudoannulata. Chemosphere 2021, 268, 129239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Venkanna, Y.; Suroshe, S.S.; Dahuja, A. Non-consumptive effects of the zigzag ladybird beetle, Cheilomenes Sexmaculata (Fab.) on its prey, the cotton aphid, Aphis Gossypii Glover. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2021, 31, 1204–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schmitz, O.J.; Rosenblatt, A.E. The temperature dependence of predation stress and prey nutritional stoichiometry. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wat, L.W.; Chao, C.; Bartlett, R.; Buchanan, J.L.; Millington, J.W.; Chih, H.J.; Chowdhury, Z.S.; Biswas, P.; Huang, V.; Shin, L.J.; et al. A role for triglyceride lipase brummer in the regulation of sex differences in Drosophila fat storage and breakdown. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Canavoso, L.E.; Jouni, Z.E.; Karnas, K.J.; Pennington, J.E.; Wells, M.A. Fat metabolism in insects. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2001, 21, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Skowronek, P.; Wójcik, Ł.; Strachecka, A. Fat body-multifunctional insect tissue. Insects 2021, 12, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Arrese, E.L.; Soulages, J.L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bretscher, H.; O’Connor, M.B. The Role of muscle in insect energy homeostasis. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 580687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kaplan, I.; McArt, S.H.; Thaler, J.S. Plant defenses and predation risk differentially shape patterns of consumption, growth, and digestive efficiency in a guild of leaf-chewing insects. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hawlena, D.; Schmitz, O.J. Physiological stress as a fundamental mechanism linking predation to ecosystem functioning. Am. Nat. 2010, 176, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Redinger, J.M.; Halvorson, H.M.; Gifford, M.E. Variable stoichiometric and macronutrient responses to lizard predation in Ozark glade grasshopper communities. Oecologia 2022, 199, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, C.; Jansen, M.; De Meester, L.; Stoks, R. Energy storage and fecundity explain deviations from ecological stoichiometry predictions under global warming and size-selective predation. J. Anim. Ecol. 2016, 85, 1431–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gish, M. Aphids detect approaching predators using plant-borne vibrations and visual cues. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 1209–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zha, Y.P.; Lei, C.L. Effects of ultrasound-stress on antioxidant enzyme activities of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Agr. Urban Entomol. 2012, 28, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Frank, D.A. Evidence for top predator control of a grazing ecosystem. Oikos 2008, 117, 1718–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Schwenke, R.A.; Lazzaro, B.P.; Wolfner, M.F. Reproduction-immunity trade-offs in Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016, 61, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wright, C.M.; Lichtenstein, J.L.L.; Montgomery, G.A.; Luscuskie, L.P.; Pinter-Wollman, N.; Pruitt, J.N. Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2017, 71, 126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Culshaw-Maurer, M.; Sih, A.; Rosenheim, J.A. Bugs scaring bugs: Enemy-risk effects in biological control systems. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 23, 1693–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Buchanan, A.L.; Hermann, S.L.; Lund, M.; Szendrei, Z. A meta-analysis of non-consumptive predator effects in arthropods: The Influence of organismal and environmental characteristics. Oikos 2017, 126, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schmitz, O.J.; Grabowski, J.H.; Peckarsky, B.L.; Preisser, E.L.; Trussell, G.C.; Vonesh, J.R. From individuals to ecosystem function: Toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 2008, 89, 2436–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sih, A.; Bolnick, D.I.; Luttbeg, B.; Orrock, J.L.; Peacor, S.D.; Pintor, L.M.; Preisser, E.; Rehage, J.S.; Vonesh, J.R. Predator–prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 2010, 119, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nakano, R.; Ito, A.; Tokumaru, S. Sustainable pest control inspired by prey-predator ultrasound interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2211007119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rypstra, A.L.; Buddle, C.M. Spider silk reduces insect herbivory. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9, 20120948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental apparatus for testing the impact of the non-consumptive effects of the H. axyridis on S. frugiperda adults.
Figure 1. Experimental apparatus for testing the impact of the non-consumptive effects of the H. axyridis on S. frugiperda adults.
Insects 15 00395 g001
Figure 2. The fecundity of S. frugiperda females that were threatened by H. axyridis. Those without non-consumptive effects were used as the control. Data are presented as mean ± SE, and **** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.0001).
Figure 2. The fecundity of S. frugiperda females that were threatened by H. axyridis. Those without non-consumptive effects were used as the control. Data are presented as mean ± SE, and **** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.0001).
Insects 15 00395 g002
Figure 3. Non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis on hormone activities and VTG content of the S. frugiperda adults. (A) Ecdysone (ECR), (B) juvenile hormone (JH), and (C) vitellogenin (VTG). Data are presented as mean ± SE, * above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis on hormone activities and VTG content of the S. frugiperda adults. (A) Ecdysone (ECR), (B) juvenile hormone (JH), and (C) vitellogenin (VTG). Data are presented as mean ± SE, * above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01).
Insects 15 00395 g003
Figure 4. Non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis on antioxidant enzyme activities of the S. frugiperda adults. (A) H2O2, (B) CATs, (C) PODs, and (D) SODs. Data are presented as mean ± SE, ** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01), *** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.001), and ns above the bars indicates a significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 4. Non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis on antioxidant enzyme activities of the S. frugiperda adults. (A) H2O2, (B) CATs, (C) PODs, and (D) SODs. Data are presented as mean ± SE, ** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01), *** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.001), and ns above the bars indicates a significant difference (p > 0.05).
Insects 15 00395 g004
Figure 5. Non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis on nutrients in S. frugiperda. (A) Glycogen, (B) protein, (C) trehalose, and (D) triglyceride. Data are presented as mean ± SE, * above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), ** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01), and ns above the bars indicates a significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 5. Non-consumptive effects of H. axyridis on nutrients in S. frugiperda. (A) Glycogen, (B) protein, (C) trehalose, and (D) triglyceride. Data are presented as mean ± SE, * above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), ** above the bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01), and ns above the bars indicates a significant difference (p > 0.05).
Insects 15 00395 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, Z.; Lv, X.; Huang, Y.; Kong, W.; Ma, C.; Yan, H. Non-Consumptive Effects of Harmonia axyridis on the Reproduction and Metabolism of Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects 2024, 15, 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060395

AMA Style

Fan Z, Lv X, Huang Y, Kong W, Ma C, Yan H. Non-Consumptive Effects of Harmonia axyridis on the Reproduction and Metabolism of Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects. 2024; 15(6):395. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060395

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Zeyun, Xiaolu Lv, Yuyang Huang, Weizhen Kong, Chongjian Ma, and He Yan. 2024. "Non-Consumptive Effects of Harmonia axyridis on the Reproduction and Metabolism of Spodoptera frugiperda" Insects 15, no. 6: 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060395

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop