Next Article in Journal
Insecticide Efficacy of Green Synthesis Silver Nanoparticles on Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Compatibility of Bioinsecticides with Parasitoids for Enhanced Integrated Pest Management of Drosophila suzukii and Tuta absoluta
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unveiling the Microbiome Diversity in Telenomus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) Parasitoid Wasps

by
Mayra A. Gómez-Govea
1,
Kenzy I. Peña-Carillo
2,
Gabriel Ruiz-Ayma
3,
Antonio Guzmán-Velasco
3,
Adriana E. Flores
4,
María de Lourdes Ramírez-Ahuja
1,* and
Iram Pablo Rodríguez-Sánchez
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Fisiología Molecular y Estructural, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza 64460, Mexico
2
Campo Experimental General Terán, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Km 31 Carretera Montemorelos-China, General Terán 67400, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Conservación de Vida Silvestre y Desarrollo Sustentable, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza 64460, Mexico
4
Laboratorio de Entomología Médica, Departamento de Zoología de Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza 66455, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(7), 468; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070468
Submission received: 31 May 2024 / Revised: 18 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 23 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Behavior and Pathology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study was undertaken to determine the gut microbiota of six species of the Telenomus genus (T. alecto, T. sulculus, T. fariai, T. remus, T. podisi, and T. lobatus). Wasp parasitoids were collected from their hosts in different locations in Mexico. DNA was extracted from gut collection, and sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA was carried out in Illumina® MiSeq™. Among the six species of wasps, results showed that the most abundant phylum were Proteobacteria (82.3%), Actinobacteria (8.1%), and Firmicutes (7.8%). The most important genera were Delftia and Enterobacter. Seventeen bacteria species were found to be shared among the six species of wasps.

Abstract

Bacterial symbionts in insects constitute a key factor for the survival of the host due to the benefits they provide. Parasitoid wasps are closely associated with viruses, bacteria, and fungi. However, the primary symbionts and their functions are not yet known. This study was undertaken to determine the gut microbiota of six species of the Telenomus genus: T. alecto (Crawford), T. sulculus Johnson, T. fariai Costa Lima, T. remus Nixon, T. podisi Ashmead, and T. lobatus Johnson & Bin. Wasp parasitoids were collected from their hosts in different locations in Mexico. DNA was extracted from gut collection, and sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA was carried out in Illumina® MiSeq™. Among the six species of wasps, results showed that the most abundant phylum were Proteobacteria (82.3%), Actinobacteria (8.1%), and Firmicutes (7.8%). The most important genera were Delftia and Enterobacter. Seventeen bacteria species were found to be shared among the six species of wasps. The associate microbiota will help to understand the physiology of Telenomus to promote the use of these wasp parasitoids in the management of insect pests and as potential biomarkers to target new strategies to control pests.

1. Introduction

Wasps of the family Scelionidae (Hymoptera: Telenominae) are parasitoids of other insects and arachnid eggs. The family is divided into three subfamilies: Scelioninae, Teleasinae, and Telenominae [1]. The subfamily Telenominae is important because it contains the species used for the biological control of insect pests of the orders Hemiptera and Lepidoptera, noxious for agriculture pests, forestry, and medical importance [2]. In particular, species of Telenomus parasitize insects of the orders Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, and Neuroptera. For example, the species T. remus has been reported to parasitize Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) eggs [3], while the species T. alecto has been associated with the parasitization of Diatrea magnifactella (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs [4].
In recent years, gut microbiota has been the focus of studies for a wide variety of organisms, including insects, revealing that it plays a key role in host nutrition, detoxification of toxic compounds, and reproduction [5,6,7]. Several studies of wasps have been focused on the Nasonia genera, which have determined the fundamental role of the intestinal microbiome for survival [8,9,10].
Intestinal colonization of insects by bacteria depends on several factors, including taxonomy, evolution, ecology, diet, and host life stage [11]. The core microbiome is an essential group of host-associated microorganisms notable for their biological function [12]. Many studies have shown the presence of bacteria essential for insects; for example, the bacteria Buchnera supplies essential amino acids and vitamins for aphids [13], and Blochmannia has been found as an obligate intracellular endosymbiont in ants of the genus Camponotus [14]. Currently, using the intracellular symbiont Wolbachia pipientis as a manipulator of mosquito reproduction has raised interest in its application in the biological control of its populations [15]. In hymenopterans, the presence of endosymbiotic fitness-impairing bacteria, such as Rickettsia, Arsenophonus, and Wolbachia, has been studied [16,17]. Bacteria in bees, such as Apis mellifera L., have been associated with health and nutrition [18,19,20]. In recent studies, the microbiome of the carpenter bee (Ceratina calcarata) was identified with thirteen central bacteria important for their physiology: Rosenbergiella, Pseudomonas, Gilliamella, Lactobacillus, Caulobacter, Snodgrassella, Acinetobacter, Corynebacterium, Sphingomonas, Commensalibacter, Methylobacterium, Massilia, and Stenotrophomonas [21]. In addition, bumblebees are known to harbor a simple and distinct gut microbiome comprised of core bacterial species within the genus Snodgrassella, Gilliamella, Lactobacillus, Bombiscardovia, Schmidhempelia, and Bifidobacterium, which defend them against pathogens [19,22].
Little information exists about the key bacteria of wasps of the genus Telenomus and their physiological importance. The study of key bacteria can be essential to understanding the basic biology of the organism and its interactions with the host [23]. The objective of this study was to determine the microbiome of six species of Telenomus: T. alecto, T. sulculus, T. fariai, T. remus, T. podisi, and T. lobatus, to understand physiological interactions between the organisms and their associated microbiome in the host.

2. Materials and Methods

The specimens were obtained from their hosts in different regions across Mexico (Figure 1). Telenomus alecto was obtained after it emerged from the eggs of Diatrea magnifactella, T. remus from Spodoptera frugiperda, T. fariai from Triatoma dimidiata (Latreille) (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), T. podisi from Arvelius albopunctatus (DeGeer) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), T. sulculus from Zelus renardii Kolenati (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), and T. lobatus from Chrysopidae. Eggs of all hosts were taken to the laboratory (HR 70%, T 25 ± 2 °C) and placed into Petri dishes. Observations were made until parasitoids emerged. The sex ratio of the parasitoids was recorded.

2.1. Gut Collection

Guts from eight-day-old adults were used for tissue isolation. Before dissection, adult insects were surface sterilized with 96% ethanol for three minutes and rinsed with sterile deionized water thrice. Sixty female adults of each species were dissected on a plate that contained 2 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered solution (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4, Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MS, USA) using a pair of sterilized needles (flame-sterilized and cooled using 96% ethanol) under a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ16, 1.6×). Guts were deposited in plastic Eppendorf® 1.5 mL tubes with DNA shield and stored at −70 °C for DNA extraction and sequencing.

2.2. Extraction of DNA

The samples used in this study were analyzed using the ZymoBIOMICS® service performed by Zymo Research (Irvine, CA, USA). DNA was extracted from samples with the ZymoBIOMICS®-96 MagBead DNA Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and processed with the ZymoBIOMICS™ Service–Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Four replicates were made for each Telenomus species. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene-targeted sequencing was performed using the Quick-16S™ NGS Library Prep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Bacterial 16S primers amplified the V1–V2 or V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The sequencing library was prepared according to Gómez-Govea et al. [24], and the final library was sequenced on Illumina® MiSeq™, San Diego, CA, USA.

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw reads were quality-filtered to remove low-quality data and chimeric sequences using the Dada2 pipeline [25]. Reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with representative sequences and read counts (abundances) into operational taxonomic units at 97% (species-level) sequence identity to compare OTU abundance between wasp species. If an OTU contained at most five reads, it was omitted from downstream analyses. The resulting data were analyzed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (Qiime v.1.9.1) pipeline for taxonomy assignment (Greengenes database as reference (http://greengenes.lbl accessed on 12 June 2023)), alpha-diversity (Shannon diversity), and beta-diversity (Chao1) [26]. To compare the microbial community differences among different species of wasps, a principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) on Bray–Curtis distances using Qiime v.1.9 was performed. Other analyses, such as heat maps and abundance plots, were performed with internal scripts.

3. Results

The bacterial community of six species of parasitoid wasps of Telenomus was determined. The results showed twelve phyla; the most representative phyla were Proteobacteria (82.3%), Actinobacteria (8.1%), and Firmicutes (7.8%) (Figure 2A). Twenty-one classes were identified, highlighting the classes Gammaproteobacteria (45.7%), Betaproteobacteria (32.8%), Actinobacteria (8.1%), Bacilli (6.2%), and Alphaproteobacteria (3.7%) (Figure 2B). The orders Enterobacteriales (35.2%) and Burkholderiales (31.9%) were present at high levels in all the wasps. In comparison, Corynebacteriales (10.3%), Pseudomonadales (8.0%), Propionibacteriales (4%), Bacillales (3.7%), Lactobacillales (2.6%), Rickettsiales (2.1%), Pasteurellales (1.7%), and Clostridiales (1.4%) were other orders that were found (Figure 3). This study mainly highlighted two families: Comamonadaceae (31.3%) and Enterobacteriaceae (35.2%). At the genus level, it was dominated by Delftia (31.1%), Enterobacter (33%), Moraxella (4%), Pseudomonas (2.0%), and Acinetobacter (1.8%).
In addition, the results showed other genera with percentages above 1% that were not present in all wasp species studied. Staphylococcus (2.8%) and Corynebacterium (1.6%) were found only in four wasp species (T. alecto, T. sulculus, T. fariai, and T. lobatus); Cutibacterium (4.0%) in three species (T. alecto, T. fariai, and T. lobatus); Wolbachia (1.6%) in two species (T. sulculus and T. podisi); Actinobacillus (1.5%) in four species (T. alecto, T. sulculus, T. remus, and T. podisi); Salmonella (1.4%) in five species (T. sulculus, T. fariai, T. remus, T. podisi, and T. lobatus); and Streptococcus (1.3%) in four species (T. alecto, T. fariai, T. podisi, and T. lobatus). Three hundred bacteria species have been detected in this study, among which 17 bacteria species were found in all Telenomus species (Figure 4).
Sixty-four percent of the bacteria genus corresponded to Enterobacter (Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter ludwigii, (Figure 5); and the complex Enterobacter cloacae-hormaechei-ludwigii) and Delftia (Delftia lacustris-tsuruhatensis complex) (Figure 6).
In addition, other species were detected, such as Cutibacterium acnes, Wolbachia pipientis, Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus epidermidis-hominis, Actinobacillus capsulatus, Moraxella cuniculi, and Pseudomonas otitidis (Figure 7).
The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in diversity, measured by the Shannon index, between parasitoid species T. alecto (95%CI = 2.732–4.800), T. sulculus (95%CI = 2.914–4.879), T. fariai (95%CI = 2.642–4.991), T. lobatus (95%CI = 2.669–4.739), T. remus (95%CI = 2.006–3.488), and T. podisi (95%CI = 2.552–4.060). The PCoA plot with Bray–Curtis distance comparison showed a difference between the bacterial communities of the wasp (F = 6.38, p = 0.009) grouping into two main clades, where T. alecto and T. lobatus presented similarities in their bacterial profiles. In the same way, T. remus and T. podisi presented similarities between these species. The difference in distances increased with the species T. fariai and T. sulculus, which are located outside the similarity clades (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

The contribution of intestinal microorganisms to the function of insects is very relevant in various aspects, for example, in medicine, agriculture, and ecology [5]. Insect parasitoids harbor microbial communities, including viruses, bacteria, and fungi [7,27]. To date, there is limited evidence about the gut microbiota of parasitoid wasps, especially those of the genus Telenomus. Here, we examined the gut microbiota of six species: T. alecto, T. sulculus, T. fariai, T. remus, T. podisi, and T. lobatus, to find key bacteria.
Our results showed the phyla Proteobacteria (82.3%), Actinobacteria (8.1%), and Firmicutes (7.8%) in all Telenomus species. Studies of bacterial diversity in Nasonia have shown the presence of Proteobacteria (74.4%), Actinomyces (15.7%), and Firmicutes (9.5%) [10]. Ramírez-Ahuja et al. [28] reported the microbiomes of Telenomus tridentatus (Platygastroidea: Scelionidae) (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes), which were similar to the results obtained at the phylum level.
It is known that the gut microbiome of insects consists of specialized symbionts, which are considered core residents [29]. These microbial communities vary widely among insects; factors such as the environment, diet, stage of development, and host phylogeny are determinants of their establishment [7]. In this study, 72% of the bacterial community found in Telenomus species was dominated by the genus Delftia (31.1%), Enterobacter (33%), Moraxella (4%), Pseudomonas (2.0%), and Acinetobacter (1.8%). Delftia is a diverse genus of Betaproteobacteria widely distributed in the environment with ecological versatility; many of its strains have agricultural and industrial relevance, including plant growth promotion, bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils, and heavy metal immobilization [30]. Particularly, Delftia species have been related to the ability to degrade organophosphates [31], and some strains are associated with degradation routes for di-n-butylphthalate (DBP, industrial pollutant) [32]. In the same way, these bacteria can produce bacteriocins against some bacterial and fungal pathogens [33,34,35,36]. This genus has been found in the coffee insect pest Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [37] and was isolated from the gut of chlorpyrifos ethyl-resistant insect larvae [38]. Also, it has been associated with chironomid larvae [39] and with the Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) microbiome [32,40], Colaphellus bowringi (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Hypothenemus hampei, Periplaneta americana L. [34], and Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquitoes [24]. Due to the functions reported in other insects, Delftia could be a key bacterium for future studies to determine the importance of physiological mechanisms in Telenomus species.
Another highly represented genus in the study was Enterobacter. The species of this genus have been recognized as inhabitants in the guts of several insect species [41,42,43]. Many Enterobacter strains are not simply insect commensals but confer beneficial traits to their hosts that primarily fall into two categories: provision and degradation of nutrients and protection from pathogens [44]. Enterobacter species also serve as dietary supplements (probiotics) for larvae diets. For example, the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) has been used as a probiotic strain of Enterobacter sp. and improved pupal and adult production [43,45].
Microbiome bacterial densities are important to avoid an imbalance in the microbiota [46]. Primary symbionts are essential for specific insect functions, such as synthesizing toxins, modulating the insect immune system, and protecting against natural enemies (viruses, bacteria, and parasitoids) [6,47]. In the case of the Telenomus species, since there is no information about their primary or secondary symbionts, we encourage conducting further studies to demonstrate the function of Delftia and Enterobacter in these wasps.
In this study, we found some species of bacteria, such as Wolbachia pipientis in T. sulculus and T. podisi. In Telenomus nawai, this bacterium has been shown to induce parthenogenesis, cause alterations from crossover incompatibility (cytoplasmic incompatibility), kill male offspring (male slaughter), convert genetic males into functional females (feminization), and induce full parthenogenetic reproduction, or thelithoky (induction of parthenogenesis) [48,49]. We observed that during the emergence of T. sulculus, 95% of the adults that emerged were females and the remaining were males, leading us to hypothesize that this could be due to the presence of Wolbachia.
Another bacterium found in our study was Pseudomonas. This genus has been related to other insects, such as the bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), where it contributes to its defense through nutrient competition and the inhibition of entomopathogenic fungi, as well as the provision of nutrients [50]. The genus Pseudomonas has been reported to be necessary at low densities. Still, if there is an imbalance caused by the environment or suppression of the microbiota, these bacteria could colonize, increase their density, and affect host fitness [24]. Among the species found in the microbial communities of Telenomus, some bacteria can become pathogens in domestic and wild animals [51,52,53].
The microbiome could develop an intimate relationship with the insect host in wasp parasitoids. There is increasing evidence that host–parasite interactions are influenced by microbes associated with the host [27]. Many microorganisms are transient and acquired from the environment or from interaction with the host. This has been demonstrated in insects such as Heteroptera, where extracellular bacteria are left by females on the surface of the egg in secretions or feces, which are then acquired by hatching nymphs [54]. Wasp parasitoids colonize their host, often ingested by bacteria on the outside. These bacteria can either colonize or transit through the gut [55,56]. In our results, we have six species that parasitize different hosts. However, the most abundant bacteria were distributed in all species; there is some difference in less abundant bacteria, which may be due to the host that they parasitize. The relationship between these bacteria and their host remains to be investigated to test if they have been evolutionarily conserved and if there is a phylosymbiosis.

5. Conclusions

Parasitoid insects are important components of terrestrial ecosystems in terms of biodiversity and ecological impact [27]. As the utilization of insecticides has created environmental pollution and health problems, using biological control agents such as wasp parasitoids is a promising alternative [57,58]. The technology for mass rearing of parasitoids is well-developed, relatively easy, and inexpensive. However, the effectiveness of releases is variable and depends on many factors, including the microbiota [59]. In this study, the microbiota of six species of the Telenomus genus was determined. Our findings demonstrate two main bacteria genera in the microbial community (Delftia and Enterobacter). Determining their functionality within this genus should be the subject of further studies. The resident microbiota of insects has great potential as a biomarker of insect characteristics and a target for new strategies to control pests and manipulate their characteristics.

Author Contributions

First conceived the idea: M.A.G.-G., M.d.L.R.-A. and I.P.R.-S.; carried out the experiments: M.A.G.-G., K.I.P.-C., M.d.L.R.-A. and I.P.R.-S. collected the data: M.A.G.-G., K.I.P.-C., G.R.-A., A.G.-V., A.E.F., M.d.L.R.-A. and I.P.R.-S. conducted the data analysis: M.A.G.-G., K.I.P.-C., G.R.-A. and A.G.-V. supervised the findings of the work: A.E.F., A.G.-V. and I.P.R.-S., discussed the results: M.A.G.-G., K.I.P.-C., G.R.-A., A.G.-V., A.E.F., M.d.L.R.-A. and I.P.R.-S. wrote the final manuscript version: M.A.G.-G., K.I.P.-C., G.R.-A., A.G.-V., A.E.F., M.d.L.R.-A. and I.P.R.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject database under accession numbers OR626102-OR626593 entitled “Prokaryotic 16S rRNA/Telenomus microbiome”.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Laurie Jo Elliot for providing English editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Masner, L. Revisionary notes and keys to world genera of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 1976, 108, 1–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johnson, N.F. Systematics of Nearctic Telenomus: Classification and revisions of the podisi and phymatae species groups (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Bull. Ohio Biol. Surv. 1984, 6, 1–118. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bueno, R.C.O.D.F.; Carneiro, T.R.; Bueno, A.D.F.; Pratissoli, D.; Fernandes, O.A.; Vieira, S.S. Parasitism capacity of Telenomus remus Nixon (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2010, 53, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramírez-Ahuja, M.L.; Gómez-Govea, M.A.; Trujillo-Rodríguez, G.J.; Garza-González, E.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, I.P.; Talamas, E.J. Telenomus alecto (Crawford) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), parasitoid of Diatraea magnifactella Dyar (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) from Jalisco, Mexico: A study based on morphological and molecular evidence. Fla. Entomol. 2013, 105, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Engel, P.; Moran, N.A. The gut microbiota of insects–diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 699–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Douglas, A.E. Multiorganismal insects: Diversity and function of resident microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gloder, G.; Bourne, M.E.; Verreth, C.; Wilberts, L.; Bossaert, S.; Crauwels, S.; Dicke, M.; Poelman, E.H.; Jacquemyn, H.; Lievens, B. Parasitism by endoparasitoid wasps alters the internal but not the external microbiome in host caterpillars. Anim. Microbiome 2021, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bordenstein, S.R. The capacious hologenome. Zoology 2013, 116, 260–261. [Google Scholar]
  9. Colmenarez, Y.C.; Babendreier, D.; Ferrer Wurst, F.R.; Vásquez-Freytez, C.L.; de Freitas Bueno, A. The use of Telenomus remus (Nixon, 1937) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) in the management of Spodoptera spp.: Potential, challenges and major benefits. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2022, 3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hu, H.; Wang, G.H. Nasonia–microbiome associations: A model for evolutionary hologenomics research. Trends Parasitol. 2022, 39, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Munoz-Benavent, M.; Perez-Cobas, A.E.; Garcia-Ferris, C.; Moya, A.; Latorre, A. Insects’ potential: Understanding the functional role of their gut microbiome. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 194, 113787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Risely, A. Applying the core microbiome to understand host–microbe systems. J. Anim. Ecol. 2020, 89, 1549–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Baumann, P.; Moran, N.A.; Baumann, L. The evolution and genetics of aphid endosymbionts. Bioscience 1997, 47, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feldhaar, H.; Straka, J.; Krischke, M.; Berthold, K.; Stoll, S.; Mueller, M.J.; Gross, R. Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia. BMC Biol. 2007, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Walker, T.; O’Neill, S.L. Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito-borne disease. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Adachi-Hagimori, T.; Miura, K.; Stouthamer, R. A new cytogenetic mechanism for bacterial endosymbiont-induced parthenogenesis in Hymenoptera. Proc. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2008, 275, 2667–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gerth, M.; Saeed, A.; White, J.A.; Bleidorn, C. Extensive screen for bacterial endosymbionts reveals taxon-specific distribution patterns among bees (Hymenoptera, Anthophila). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, fiv047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jeyaprakash, A.; Hoy, M.A.; Allsopp, M.H. Bacterial diversity in worker adults of Apis mellifera capensis and Apis mellifera scutellata (Insecta: Hymenoptera) assessed using 16S rRNA sequences. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2003, 84, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Martinson, V.G.; Danforth, B.N.; Minckley, R.L.; Rueppell, O.; Tingek, S.; Moran, N.A. A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honey bees and bumble bees. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martinson, V.G.; Moy, J.; Moran, N.A. Establishment of characteristic gut bacteria during development of the honeybee worker. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2830–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Graystock, P.; Rehan, S.M.; McFrederick, Q.S. Hunting for healthy microbiomes: Determining the core microbiomes of Ceratina, Megalopta, and Apis bees and how they associate with microbes in bee collected pollen. Conserv. Genet. 2017, 18, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Koch, H.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Bacterial communities in central european bumblebees: Low diversity and high specificity. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 62, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gurung, K.; Wertheim, B.; Falcao Salles, J. The microbiome of pest insects: It is not just bacteria. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2019, 167, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gómez-Govea, M.A.; Ramírez-Ahuja, M.D.L.; Contreras-Perera, Y.; Jiménez-Camacho, A.J.; Ruiz-Ayma, G.; Villanueva-Segura, O.K.; Trujillo-Rodriguez, G.D.J.; Delgado-Enciso, I.; Martínez-Fierro, M.L.; Manrique-Saide, P.; et al. Suppression of Midgut Microbiota impact pyrethroid susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 761459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Huttley, G.A. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dicke, M.; Cusumano, A.; Poelman, E.H. Microbial symbionts of parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ramírez-Ahuja, M.L.; Gómez-Govea, M.A.; Lugo-Trampe, A.; Borrego-Soto, G.; Delgado-Enciso, I.; Ponce-Garcia, G.; Martínez-Fierro, M.L.; Ramírez-Valles, E.G.; Treviño, V.; Flores-Suarez, A.E.; et al. Microbiota of Telenomus tridentatus (Platygastroidea: Scelionidae): An unwanted parasitoid. J. Appl. Entomol. 2019, 143, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bright, M.; Bulgheresi, S. A complex journey: Transmission of microbial symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhat, S.V.; Maughan, H.; Cameron, A.D.; Yost, C.K. Phylogenomic analysis of the genus Delftia reveals distinct major lineages with ecological specializations. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tehara, S.K.; Keasling, J.D. Gene cloning, purification, and characterization of a phosphodiesterase from Delftia acidovorans. AEM 2003, 69, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hail, D.; Lauzìere, I.; Dowd, S.E.; Bextine, B. Culture independent survey of the microbiota of the glassy-winged sharpshooter (Homalodisca vitripennis) using 454 pyrosequencing. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Byrd, A.L.; Deming, C.; Cassidy, S.K.B.; Harrison, O.J.; Ng, W.-I.; Conlan, S.; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program; Belkaid, Y.; Segre, J.A.; Kong, H.H. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strain diversity underlying pediatric atopic dermatitis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaal4651. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Tejman-Yarden, N.; Robinson, A.; Davidov, Y.; Shulman, A.; Varvak, A.; Reyes, F.; Rahav, G.; Nissan, I. Delftibactin-A, a Non-ribosomal Peptide with Broad Antimicrobial Activity. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ohkubo, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Cho, O.; Ogasawara, Y.; Sugita, T. Delftia acidovorans secretes substances that inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis through TCA cycle-triggered ROS production. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dee Tan, I.Y.; Bautista, M.A.M. Bacterial Survey in the Guts of Domestic Silkworms, Bombyx mori L. Insects 2022, 13, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vega, F.E.; Emche, S.; Shao, J.; Simpkins, A.; Summers, R.M.; Mock, M.B.; Ebert, D.; Infante, F.; Aoki, S.; Maul, J.E. Cultivation and genome sequencing of bacteria isolated from the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei), with emphasis on the role of caffeine degradation. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 644768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Almeida, L.G.D.; Moraes, L.A.B.D.; Trigo, J.R.; Omoto, C.; Consoli, F.L. The gut microbiota of insecticide-resistant insects houses insecticide-degrading bacteria: A potential source for biotechnological exploitation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuncham, R.; Sivaprakasam, T.; Kumar, R.P.; Sreenath, P.; Nayak, R.; Thayumanavan, T.; Reddy, G.V.S. Bacterial fauna associating with chironomid larvae from lakes of Bengaluru city, India-A 16s rRNA gene based identification. Genom. Data. 2017, 12, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rossi, J.P.; Rasplus, J.Y. Climate change and the potential distribution of the glassy-winged sharpshooter (Homalodisca vitripennis), an insect vector of Xylella fastidiosa. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 860, 160375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vasanthakumar, A.; Delalibera, I., Jr.; Handelsman, J.; Klepzig, K.D.; Schloss, P.D.; Raffa, K.F. Characterization of gut-associated bacteria in larvae and adults of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 1710–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Geiger, A.; Fardeau, M.L.; Grebaut, P.; Vatunga, G.; Josénando, T.; Herder, S.; Cuny, G.; Truc, P.; Ollivier, B. First isolation of Enterobacter, Enterococcus, and Acinetobacter spp. as inhabitants of the tsetse fly (Glossina palpalis palpalis) midgut. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2009, 9, 1364–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Augustinos, A.A.; Kyritsis, G.A.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; Abd-Alla, A.M.; Cáceres, C.; Bourtzis, K. Exploitation of the medfly gut microbiota for the enhancement of sterile insect technique: Use of Enterobacter sp. in larval diet-based probiotic applications. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stathopoulou, P.M.; Asimakis, E.; Tsiamis, G. Enterobacter: One bacterium multiple functions. In Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. Development and Field Application; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 917–945. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kyritsis, G.A.; Augustinos, A.A.; Ntougias, S.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; Bourtzis, K.; Cáceres, C. Enterobacter sp. AA26 gut symbiont as a protein source for Mediterranean fruit fly mass-rearing and sterile insect technique applications. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cavichiolli de Oliveira, N.; Cônsoli, F.L. Beyond host regulation: Changes in gut microbiome of permissive and non-permissive hosts following parasitization by the wasp Cotesia flavipes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiz206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Freitak, D.; Schmidtberg, H.; Dickel, F.; Lochnit, G.; Vogel, H.; Vilcinskas, A. The maternal transfer of bacteria can mediate trans-generational immune priming in insects. Virulence 2014, 5, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arakaki, N.; Noda, H.; Yamagishi, K. Wolbachia-induced parthenogenesis in the egg parasitoid Telenomus nawai. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2000, 96, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeong, G.; Stouthamer, R. Genetics of female functional virginity in the parthenogenesis-Wolbachia infected parasitoid wasp Telenomus nawai (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Heredity 2005, 94, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Saati-Santamaría, Z.; Rivas, R.; Kolařik, M.; García-Fraile, P. A new perspective of Pseudomonas—Host interactions: Distribution and potential ecological functions of the genus Pseudomonas within the Bark Beetle Holobiont. Biology 2021, 10, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Clark, L.L.; Dajcs, J.J.; McLean, C.H.; Bartell, J.G.; Stroman, D.W. Pseudomonas otitidis sp. nov., isolated from patients with otic infections. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Perry, A.L.; Lambert, P.A. Propionibacterium  acnes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 42, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yang, D.K.; Kim, H.H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Lim, S.K.; Yoon, S.S.; Cho, I.S. Isolation and identification of Moraxella cuniculi from a rabbit with keratoconjunctivitis. KJVR 2017, 57, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Salem, H.; Florez, L.; Gerardo, N.; Kaltenpoth, M. An out-of-body experience: The extracellular dimension for the transmission of mutualistic bacteria in insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20142957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hammer, T.J.; Janzen, D.H.; Hallwachs, W.; Jaffe, S.P.; Fierer, N. Caterpillars lack a resident gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 9641–9646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Paniagua Voirol, L.R.; Frago, E.; Kaltenpoth, M.; Hilker, M.; Fatouros, N.E. Bacterial symbionts in Lepidoptera: Their diversity, transmission, and impact on the host. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Carmo, E.D.; Bueno, A.; Bueno, R.C.O.F. Pesticide selectivity for the insect egg parasitoid Telenomus remus. BioControl 2010, 55, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Parra, J.R.P. Mass rearing of egg parasitoids for biological control programs. In Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma, Progress in Biological Control (PIBC); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 267–292. [Google Scholar]
  59. Cave, R.D. Biology, ecology and use in pest management of Telenomus remus. Biocontrol News Inf. 2000, 21, 21N–26N. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Regions where Telenomus species were collected.
Figure 1. Regions where Telenomus species were collected.
Insects 15 00468 g001
Figure 2. Taxonomic abundance at phylum (A), and at class (B) levels in Telenomus species.
Figure 2. Taxonomic abundance at phylum (A), and at class (B) levels in Telenomus species.
Insects 15 00468 g002
Figure 3. Taxonomic abundance at order level in Telenomus species.
Figure 3. Taxonomic abundance at order level in Telenomus species.
Insects 15 00468 g003
Figure 4. Interaction of bacterial species between species of wasps. The black dots mean the bacteria that are sharing the Telenomus species, for example T. sulculus and T. fariai shared nine species.
Figure 4. Interaction of bacterial species between species of wasps. The black dots mean the bacteria that are sharing the Telenomus species, for example T. sulculus and T. fariai shared nine species.
Insects 15 00468 g004
Figure 5. Composition of species of the most representative Enterobacter species.
Figure 5. Composition of species of the most representative Enterobacter species.
Insects 15 00468 g005
Figure 6. Composition of species of the most representative Delftia species.
Figure 6. Composition of species of the most representative Delftia species.
Insects 15 00468 g006
Figure 7. Heat map of species profiles with clustering of top fifty most abundant Telenomus species identified.
Figure 7. Heat map of species profiles with clustering of top fifty most abundant Telenomus species identified.
Insects 15 00468 g007
Figure 8. PCoA plot using Bray–Curtis distance showing the distribution of bacterial community composition in Telenomus species.
Figure 8. PCoA plot using Bray–Curtis distance showing the distribution of bacterial community composition in Telenomus species.
Insects 15 00468 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Govea, M.A.; Peña-Carillo, K.I.; Ruiz-Ayma, G.; Guzmán-Velasco, A.; Flores, A.E.; Ramírez-Ahuja, M.d.L.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, I.P. Unveiling the Microbiome Diversity in Telenomus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) Parasitoid Wasps. Insects 2024, 15, 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070468

AMA Style

Gómez-Govea MA, Peña-Carillo KI, Ruiz-Ayma G, Guzmán-Velasco A, Flores AE, Ramírez-Ahuja MdL, Rodríguez-Sánchez IP. Unveiling the Microbiome Diversity in Telenomus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) Parasitoid Wasps. Insects. 2024; 15(7):468. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070468

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Govea, Mayra A., Kenzy I. Peña-Carillo, Gabriel Ruiz-Ayma, Antonio Guzmán-Velasco, Adriana E. Flores, María de Lourdes Ramírez-Ahuja, and Iram Pablo Rodríguez-Sánchez. 2024. "Unveiling the Microbiome Diversity in Telenomus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) Parasitoid Wasps" Insects 15, no. 7: 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070468

APA Style

Gómez-Govea, M. A., Peña-Carillo, K. I., Ruiz-Ayma, G., Guzmán-Velasco, A., Flores, A. E., Ramírez-Ahuja, M. d. L., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, I. P. (2024). Unveiling the Microbiome Diversity in Telenomus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) Parasitoid Wasps. Insects, 15(7), 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070468

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop