Next Article in Journal
Development Modeling of Phormia regina (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
Previous Article in Journal
VOC Characterization of Byasa hedistus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) and Its Visual and Olfactory Responses during Foraging and Courtship
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 7
10.3390/insects15070549
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New COI-COII mtDNA Region Haplotypes in the Endemic Honey Bees Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Algeria

by
Amira Chibani Bahi Amar
1,*,
Nacera Tabet Aoul
1,2,
Riad Fridi
1,
Alain Vignal
3 and
Kamila Canale-Tabet
3,*
1
Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et Cellulaire (LGMC), Département de Génétique Moléculaire Appliquée, Université des Sciences et de la Technologie d’Oran Mohamed Boudiaf, USTOMB, BP 1505, El M’naouer, Oran 31000, Algeria
2
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty SNV, University of Oran1 Ahmed Ben Bella, Oran 31000, Algeria
3
GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, INPT, INP-ENVT, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(7), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070549 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 May 2024 / Revised: 16 July 2024 / Accepted: 18 July 2024 / Published: 20 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Molecular Biology and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Currently, one of the most raised issues regarding the preservation of endemic honey bees is the importation of foreign subspecies, leading to genetic introgression and hybridization between subspecies. In Algeria, many beekeepers have reported importing foreign honey bees, notably the Italian Apis mellifera ligustica, for their high honey production. In order to provide a molecular characterization and a better knowledge of the genetic background of the Algerian honey bees subspecies A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis, we analyzed the widely used COI-COII mitochondrial marker. In this study, we sequenced 139 drones of which 68 were from 20 regions in Algeria, and 71 individuals as a reference population, sampled in Europe, the South West Indian Ocean archipelagos, and Madagascar, representing the evolutionary lineages M, C, and A. As a result, we found that all Algerian samples belong to the African lineage A with the identification of 24 haplotypes, of which 16 are reported for the first time. The reference population shows ten different haplotypes distributed over the three lineages, with the identification of a new haplotype carried by two individuals sampled in France. The results of this survey show the absence of evidence of genetic introgression between Algerian and European honey bees.

Abstract

The practice of beekeeping in Algeria is of great cultural, social, and economic importance. However, the importation of non-local subspecies reported by beekeepers has disrupted the natural geographical distribution area and the genetic diversity of the native honey bees. To assess the genetic diversity of A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis, and their relationships with African and European subspecies, the COI-COII intergenic region was analyzed in 335 individuals, 68 sampled in Algeria, 71 in Europe, Madagascar, and the South West Indian Ocean archipelagos, and 196 sequences recovered from GenBank. The results show the presence of the A lineage exclusively in Algerian samples with the identification of 24 haplotypes of which 16 are described for the first time. These haplotypes were found to be shared by both subspecies, with A74 being the most common haplotype in the population studied. The sequence comparison indicates the existence of three polymorphisms of the COI-COII marker: P0Q, P0QQ, and P0QQQ. One new haplotype was identified in the M lineage in samples from France. No evidence of genetic introgression within the Algerian honey bee population was detected. These data enhance our knowledge of the genetic diversity and emphasize the importance of protecting these local subspecies.

1. Introduction

The western honey bee (Apis mellifera) is among the most effective pollinators, playing an important ecological and economical role in ecosystems and agriculture globally [1]. Diversity within the Apis mellifera species has been studied from various angles, including genetics, morphological, ecological, and behavioral traits. Historically, Apis mellifera has about 30 recognized subspecies [2] divided into four main evolutionary lineages, according to their geographical range: A: African; M: Northern and Western European; C: Southeastern European; and O: Middle Eastern [3,4]. A fifth group has been found in the southern part of the Middle East: Y, which has been described as different from the O lineage found in the north [5]. Previous studies on Algerian honey bees have demonstrated their belonging to the African evolutionary lineage [6,7,8].
The honey bees Apis mellifera intermissa [9] and Apis mellifera sahariensis [10] are subspecies of the western honey bee Apis mellifera and are endemic to Algeria [3]. A. m. intermissa is commonly known as the Tellian honey bee and is found in Northern Africa, extending over Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco [3]. Multiple analyses describe A. m. intermissa as a black-colored, fairly aggressive, highly productive honey bee and well adapted to the climate of the region [11,12]. In contrast, the Saharan honey bee A. m. sahariensis is found only in the southern part of Algeria and extends to Morocco [10]. It is described as a yellow-colored honey bee and less aggressive than A. m. intermissa. Its morphological and behavioral characteristics enable it to thrive in difficult environmental conditions such as high temperatures, drought, and limited water availability [13,14]. Despite this, these subspecies, especially A. m. sahariensis, are facing multiple challenges, such as global warming, exposure to pesticides, and certain beekeeping practices in particular transhumance that jeopardize the survival of these honey bees [15].
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is an extensively used tool to assess genetic diversity and phylogeography among Apis mellifera subspecies, especially the hypervariable tRNAleu-COII or COI-COII region, having insertion–deletion and copy-number variation polymorphisms in addition to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [16,17]. The DraI test has been used on a large scale and has proved its effectiveness in providing valuable insights on population structure, genetic variation, and evolutionary relationships within honey bee populations [5,18,19,20]. The DraI test consists of performing an enzymatic digestion, also known as PCR–RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism), on the non-coding intergenic region of mtDNA, located between the end of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene and the beginning of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit II gene [21]. Variations in restriction patterns reflect the genetic diversity and evolution within Apis mellifera subspecies. This region shows differences in nucleotide composition, sequence length, and structural organization between Apis mellifera subspecies [22]. The African and European lineages show variation in sequence size, due to the presence, or absence, and number of repeats of the P and Q units, respectively. The African A lineage can be represented by P0 or P1 units, while the M lineage features only the P unit. On the other hand, the European C lineage has no P unit [7]. Multiple studies using mtDNA were conducted to analyze the genetic structure and to assess the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of African honey bee populations [5,23,24].
In order to gain a better understanding of the biogeography of the western honey bees in Algeria, we analyzed the mtDNA haplotype diversity of honey bee samples from northern and southern Algeria. A reference population of previously described samples representing the main evolutionary lineages was used to provide a broader perspective of Algerian honey bees’ genetic diversity in an extended geographical scope. This study aims to (i) contribute to increase our knowledge of the genetic architecture of the mtDNA intergenic region COI-COII in Algerian honey bees, (ii) identify traces of genetic introgression into local honey bee populations in the area, and (iii) describe the mitochondrial genetic diversity of A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Honey Bee Sampling

Sampling of haploid drones was conducted in ten regions of Algeria from 2021 to 2022. In total, 60 drones either in the pupal or larval stage were sampled from frames in beehives. This allows the identification of the beehives and ensures each selected drone for the study represents a different colony. In addition, we included 20 adult samples originating from ten different sites in Algeria obtained from a previous study [25] (Figure 1). During the sampling, the distinction between the two subspecies was based on the coloration observed in honey bees. A. m. intermissa is known to be a black bee, found in the north of Algeria [9], and A. m. sahariensis is described to be a yellow honey bee found in the south of Algeria [10]. Out of the 80 samples, we collected A. m. intermissa drones (n = 66) at 16 regions in the north, A. m. sahariensis drones (n = 14) over 5 regions in the south, and we were able to sample both A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis in 1 common region (EL-Bayadh) (Supplementary Table S1).
In addition, 75 samples representing the three evolutionary lineages A, C, and M were obtained from INRAE Occitanie—Toulouse, France. The African (A) lineage was represented by A. m. unicolor individuals from the South West Indian Ocean archipelagos (SWIO) and Madagascar. In Europe, the honey bees A. m. mellifera, A. m. carnica, A. m. ligustica, A. m. caucasia, and Buckfast were represented, originating from five countries: France, Italy, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia (Supplementary Table S1).

2.2. DNA Extraction

The haploid drone samples were stored in absolute ethanol at −20 °C until molecular analysis. Total DNA was extracted from the head and thorax for adult samples, while the whole body was used for larval or pupal samples. The extraction was carried out as follows: we added 490 µL cell lysis buffer (TNES-Urea: 1 M Tris HCl, pH 8, 0.5 M EDTA, 3 M NaCl, 10% SDS) to the material, then two volumes of Proteinase K (eurobio GEXPRO01) 10 mg/mL in two steps: (i) 12.5 µL with incubation during 3 h at 56 °C; (ii) 5 µL with overnight incubation at 37 °C. Cell debris precipitation was realized by adding 200 µL of 3 M NaCl to samples, then a centrifugation at 12,500× g at 4 °C for 30 min was performed. The supernatant was transferred to new tubes with 2.5 µL of RNase (100 mg/mL) and precipitation of DNA was carried out by adding absolute ethanol (100%). Each DNA pellet was rinsed in 70% ethanol, air dried, resuspended in 100 µL TE buffer 10/0.1 (10 mM Tris HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA), and incubated overnight at 37 °C under constant agitation. DNA quality and quantity assessment were carried out by dosing methods: NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), PicoGreen fluorescence assay, and electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel.

2.3. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis

The PCR amplification of the COI-COII intergenic region was carried out using E2 (5′-GGCAGAATAAGTGCATTG-3′) and H2 (5′-CAATATCATTGATGACC-3′) primers following the method and reaction conditions as described in Garnery et al., 1993 [21]. A volume of 2.5 µL from each PCR product was examined on a 2% agarose gel.
The sequencing reaction was prepared as follows: 2.5 µL of each PCR product was purified by adding 1 µL of each exonuclease and TSAP (Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase) in an 18 µL final volume. The sequencing reaction mixture was split into two volumes, and 1 µL of each primer (forward and reverse) was added. All PCR products were sent to GENEWIZ (Azenta Life Sciences, Leipzig, Germany) for Sanger sequencing in both directions. The 310 sequences produced (corresponding to 155 individuals) were manually checked for base calling using ChromasPro 2.1.10.1. (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewantin, Australia), and sequences with bad quality were removed. The 139 sequences retained were aligned with 196 published sequences available in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ accessed on 9 February 2023) using Jalview 2.11.3.3 [26]. Sequences were aligned according to the size and structure of the COI-COII intergenic region.
Additionally, the sequences obtained were digested in silico using the REBASE tool version 212, which simulates DNA digestion by using computational tools supplied by the REBASE database (http://rebase.neb.com/rebase/rebtools.html (accessed on 15 September 2023).

2.4. Nomenclature of Novel Haplotypes

The extensive use of the intergenic region COI-COII to analyze the genetic diversity of populations has generated a vast amount of data and sequences, with identical sequences bearing different names and, conversely, different sequences published under the same names. This makes the use of published sequences a real challenge. In this study, new haplotypes were identified and named following the nomenclature system described in Rortais et al. in 2011 [27] and Chavez-Galarza et al. in 2017 [7].

2.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequence alignment of the dataset (196 sequences retrieved from GenBank and 139 newly produced), fasta files generation, and phylogenetic tree construction were conducted using MEGA X 11.0.13 [28]. Haplotypes were identified using the package Sidier (version 4.1.0) in R studio. Haplotype median-joining networks were constructed using PopArt version 1.7 [29]. However, the PopArt software is not appropriate to deal with insertions/deletions (indels) and will mask sites exceeding 5% missing data. This induces the loss of the P element due to its absence in sequences belonging to the C lineage. In addition, the absence of duplications of the Q element in some sequences is interpreted by PopArt as sites containing undefined states and will mask them. To overcome these problems, sequences were modified according to the format accepted by PopArt following previous studies [30,31]. Briefly, sequences were re-coded such that indels were transformed into bases and gaps were changed into “A”, “C”, “G”, or “T” according to the possibilities left at the given position. Due to the complexity of the COI-COII intergenic region and size differences between sequences, haplotype networks were constructed independently for each structure (e.g., P0Q, P0QQ, P0QQQ…) [31].

3. Results

In this study, we sequenced and analyzed a total of 155 individuals. We removed 16 sequences due to their bad quality. The remaining 139 sequences correspond to 68 individuals collected from 20 regions in Algeria, and 71 representing the three main evolutionary lineages A, M, and C from Europe, the SWIO, and Madagascar. In addition, 196 sequences (A lineage (n = 115), M lineage (n = 44), C lineage (n = 37)) retrieved from GenBank were added as a reference population (Supplementary Table S2). The evolutionary lineages and haplotypes of honey bees were identified based on the genetic structure of the mitochondrial intergenic region COI-COII as previously reported in several studies [7,21,32,33,34].

3.1. Honey Bee Evolutionary Lineage and Haplotype Identification

The genetic structure of the COI-COII intergenic region in Algerian samples showed the existence of three polymorphisms: (i) P0Q, (ii) P0QQ, and (iii) P0QQQ (Figure 2), with the P0QQ polymorphism being the most prevalent at 61.8% of occurrences (Table 1).
Out of 68 Algerian samples analyzed, a total of 24 haplotypes were identified in this study including 16 haplotypes described for the first time (Table 2). Two haplotypes newly described were found to be very similar to those previously described by Attia et al. in 2023 [35], exhibiting slight variations (one or two nucleotides). In order to standardize the labelling of haplotypes and to avoid redundancy, based on the criteria described previously [7,27], we renamed the haplotypes as follows (nomenclature used in Attia et al., 2023 > nomenclature used in this paper): Alg5 > A71; Alg1 > A74c; Alg2 > A74d; Alg3 > A74e; and Alg4 > A74f.
All haplotypes previously and newly described in Algerian honey bees identified in this study belong to the African lineage A. Furthermore, the genetic structure of the mtDNA intergenic region of the reference samples sequenced in this study showed five different polymorphisms: P0Q, P0QQ, PQ, PQQ, and Q (Table 1), with the identification of 10 different haplotypes distributed over the three lineages A, M, and C (Supplementary Table S3).

3.2. COI-COII Haplotypes’ Distribution and Comparison

Among the haplotypes identified in the Algerian honey bee population, the most predominant haplotype is the newly described haplotype A74 (P0QQ), representing 24% of the total sample size in Algerian subspecies, found in both A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis (Supplementary Table S3), and distributed across seven different regions (Supplementary Table S4). The novel haplotype A1x was found in six different regions in the country (Supplementary Table S4) with a percentage of 10.2% of the Algerian honey bee population, and was shown to exhibit the P0Q structure. The widely known haplotypes of the African lineage (A1n (P0Q), A8d (P0Q), A8f (P0Q)), and previously reported to be present in the North African honey bee population [7], were recorded with an overall percentage of 7.3% for the A1n haplotype and 6% for both A8d and A8f (Supplementary Table S3).
Within the African A lineage, all A. m. unicolor individuals analyzed showed a P0Q structure and exhibited exclusively the haplotype A1. Interestingly, one A. m. mellifera individual sampled in France clustered with the African lineage, presenting a mitochondrial haplotype A4 and a P0QQ genetic structure. Among the M lineage, three haplotypes were identified: M4 and M6 had been previously reported and the third haplotype M4r was deemed to be a novel haplotype, carried by two A. m. mellifera individuals from France with a PQQ structure (Supplementary Table S3). Within the C lineage, six haplotypes were detected in individuals from Europe and SWIO islands, with a predominance of the C1a and C2_d haplotypes shown by 37% and 32% of C lineage individuals, respectively.

3.3. Evolutionary Lineages Distribution and Relationships among Haplotypes

The median-joining network based on the P0Q intergenic structure indicates the presence of four separate groups (Figure 3A). The first group shows sequences of A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis subspecies from Algeria, newly sequenced and previously published, clustering with sequences from the A lineage retrieved from GenBank, corresponding to A. m. intermissa, A. m. sahariensis, and A. m. iberiensis. The second group presents sequences from the SWIO islands and Madagascar that are grouped with published sequences corresponding to the A. m. unicolor subspecies. The third group contains reference sequences from the M lineage, and the fourth group shows sequences corresponding to the African Z sub-lineage subspecies A. m. lamarckii. The median-joining network produced from sequences with the P0QQQ intergenic structure shown in Figure 3B illustrates three groups: (i) the Algerian node represented by the newly described A77′ haplotype (individual ALG_Mascara2_3), (ii) the second group of the Iberian honey bee A. m. iberiensis sequences representing the A lineage; and (iii) the third group indicating sequences from the M lineage.
A total of 103 sequences analyzed in this study presented the P0QQ intergenic structure. The Algerian honey bees A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis appear to be close to the Iberian honey bee A. m. iberiensis. Individuals from the African A lineage form a separated cluster comprising A. m. unicolor, A. m. scutellata, and A. m. anadasonii sequences (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

The genetic diversity and population structure of honey bees has been extensively investigated using the mitochondrial non-coding region COI-COII [22]. The results of this study provide a better description of honey bee populations in Algeria. A total of 335 sequences were analyzed, including 139 sequences obtained from Algerian, SWIO, Madagascar, and European samples, and 196 sequences representative of the main evolutionary lineages A, C, and M collected from GenBank.
Sequence analysis of the 68 individuals sampled in Algeria revealed 24 haplotypes, including 16 described for the first time and 8 haplotypes previously published [7,31,34,35]. Our results indicate that the most common haplotypes in Algeria are the novel haplotypes A74 (24%) and A1x (10%), followed by the previously described haplotypes A1n (7.3%), A8d, A8f, and A71 (previously Alg5) (6%), respectively. The haplotypes A8d, A71 (Alg5), A1x, and A74 are found to be shared by the two native subspecies in Algeria (Supplementary Table S3).
The Algerian honey bee population has largely been described based on morphometric observations [11,36,37], microsatellites [20], and mitochondrial DNA [38]. Based on the COI-COII mtDNA marker, Bouzeraa et al. (2020) conducted a study using the PCR-RFLP approach to assess the genetic diversity of Algerian honey bees, and they have demonstrated the difficulties in describing the genetic architecture of the samples and determining with precision their variants (e.g., P0Q or PQ) based solely on the DraI test [38]. These results support the fact that despite the PCR-RFLP DraI method having proven effectiveness in identifying sampled colonies [22], sequencing remains necessary to fully describe the haplotypes and genetic structure of the analyzed individuals. The sequence analysis of the intergenic non-coding region COI-COII in this study shows that the Algerian honey bee population is characterized by three types of intergenic region architecture: (i) P0Q, (ii) P0QQ, and (iii) P0QQQ. These results are concordant with those published previously by Achou et al. 2015 [39]. All Algerian individuals have the P0 form of the P element, which is typical of the African A lineage [5,32,40], but they are differentiated with the number of repetitions of the Q element and by their DraI restriction profiles.
Although A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis are geographically separated from European honey bee populations, it has been previously reported that European honey bees such as A. m. ligustica and Buckfast have been imported by local beekeepers because of their high productivity [20]. Based on the PCR-RFLP DraI test, Achou et al. (2015) reported the presence of foreign honey bees from the M and C lineages in Algeria, representing 3.1% of the population studied. The M lineage was detected in four regions [39], two of which are common to our study (Annaba and Mostaganem) where we did not find any trace of introgression. This can be explained by the different beekeeping practices, in particular the importation of queen bees.
Interestingly, in the 14 A. m. sahariensis specimens sampled in our study, two newly described haplotypes (A74b and A75) are found exclusively in this subspecies. The current sample size of 68 individuals is rather small, but by increasing the number of A. m. sahariensis and A. m. intermissa samples, we will eventually be able to see whether these haplotypes are specific to the Saharan honey bee.
Our data support the hypothesis of the absence of evidence of genetic introgression within Algerian honey bees, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 where all Algerian sequences cluster together and stand apart from individuals from the M and C lineages. These findings align with those reported by a recent study conducted on the analysis of the whole-genome sequence of A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis, where Algerian and European individuals form two distinct clusters [41]. The closeness observed between Algerian and Iberian honey bees (Figure 4) (Supplementary Figure S2) is due to the African mitochondrial origin of A. m. iberiensis individuals from the south of the Iberian Peninsula that are near to the Gibraltar strait [7].
Among the samples analyzed, 32.9% of A. m. unicolor subspecies belong the African lineage A and all the sequences correspond to the A1 haplotype, the remaining 7.1% belong to the C lineage and show three haplotypes: the C2 haplotype found on Reunion Island, and the C2_d and C1_a haplotypes found in Rodrigues (Supplementary Figure S1). Our results concerning the native subspecies of SWIO and Madagascar A. m. unicolor are fully concordant with those published by Techer et al. (2017) where the A1 haplotype is shared by all the SWIO archipelagos except for Rodrigues [31,42].
The African honey bee populations split into three evolutionary lineages A, O, and Y, comprising at least 11 different subspecies described to date [22,31], with a predominance of the A lineage [5,22,24]. The median-joining networks show a split between Algerian and SWIO honey bee populations, although they both belong to the A lineage (Figure 2 and Figure 3). These results confirm the high mtDNA variability observed within the African lineage. The African honey bee subspecies have been widely described with morphometrics and molecular tools to provide a better knowledge on the diversity and geographical distributions of these subspecies [3,5,10,17,43]. The high diversity observed in African honey bees in morphological, behavioral, and molecular aspects is due to local adaptations to different environmental factors [3,43,44], but also due to the introduction of foreign subspecies which has led to genetic introgression and hybridization between subspecies [24].
Despite the large number of studies conducted on the intergenic mitochondrial region COI-COII in Europe [21,27,40,45], we report for the first time the haplotype M4r—carried by two individuals sampled in France displaying the PQQ intergenic structure. Interestingly, two specimens sampled in France, described earlier as A. m. mellifera individuals from the M lineage [46], show type C mitochondria (Q structure) and exhibit the haplotypes C2 and C31. The use of the mitochondrial COI-COII marker is considered as a starting point for analyzing honey bee diversity. Growing evidence on this hypervariable region suggests studies should be extended to other parts of the mitochondrial genome and should be associated as much as possible with nuclear DNA investigations.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study expand our knowledge of the genetic diversity of Algerian honey bee populations. Based on the COI-COII mitochondrial marker, we have identified 16 haplotypes reported for the first time in Algeria and 8 haplotypes previously described, as well as an M lineage haplotype newly described in France. All the individuals sampled in Algeria belong to the African evolutionary lineage. These results support the absence of genetic introgression traces in A. m. intermissa and A. m. sahariensis. Although multiple studies previously reported exchange with European subspecies, no trace of introgression was detected, at least in our sampling. However, to confirm our results of the absence of introgression and specific A. m. sahariensis haplotypes it would be interesting to extend the study to a larger number of individuals in particular A. m. sahariensis from different beekeepers and sampling areas.
As a perspective, we aim to analyze the complete mitochondrial genome of Algerian honey bees, in order to provide a current view of the genetic composition of the Algerian native subspecies and to supply molecular tools that can be used in a biodiversity preservation policy of these subspecies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects15070549/s1, Figure S1: Median-joining network inferred from sequences from C lineage (Q), with the C.lineage.Europe sequences correspond to individuals sampled in Europe with no data reported on the subspecies name; Figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of A lineage haplotypes. The tree is neighbor-joining. Nodes are supported by 1000 bootstraps; Table S1. Sampling sites in Algeria, the South West Indian Ocean archipelagos (SWIO), Madagascar, and Europe. n = sample size; Table S2: Description of reference population inferred from NCBI; Table S3: Haplotypes identified with the percentage of occurrence in each sampling areas: Algeria, the South West Indian Ocean archipelagos (SWIO), Madagascar, and Europe. n = sample size; Table S4: Haplotype frequencies for sampling sites in Algeria, the SWIO, Madagascar, and Europe. Sample sizes are mentioned in the third line.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C.-T., N.T.A. and A.C.B.A. methodology, A.C.B.A. and K.C.-T.; validation, A.C.B.A., K.C.-T. and A.V.; formal analysis, A.C.B.A., K.C.-T. and A.V.; investigation, A.C.B.A.; resources, A.C.B.A. and R.F.; data curation, A.C.B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.B.A.; writing—review and editing, A.C.B.A., N.T.A., K.C.-T., A.V. and R.F.; visualization, A.C.B.A., N.T.A. and K.C.-T.; supervision, N.T.A. and K.C.-T.; project administration, K.C.-T.; funding acquisition, K.C.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the INRAE Département de Génétique Animale (INRAE Animal Genetics division) and by PHC—Tassili 2021–2023 N°46060VM “Étude de la diversité génétique apicole en Algérie”, a French–Algerian cooperation program that supports joint research projects over a 3-year period (coordinator K CANALE-TABET), and the TSARA initiative INRAE 2022 Transforming Food and Agricultural Systems through Research in Partnership with Africa (coordinator K CANALE-TABET).

Data Availability Statement

Sequences for haplotypes newly described in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: PP667401—PP667417.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Algerian beekeepers, especially M. Hamzaoui, H. Diffallah, and C. Diffallah (National Association of Professional Beekeepers ANAP) and Pr A. Ayad (University Abderrahmane Mira Bejaia Algeria) and S. Saci (National Institute of Agronomic Research of Algeria INRAA) for their effective participation in honey bee sampling. We are also thankful to E. Labarthe and K. Feve (INRAE Occitanie–Toulouse, France) for their assistance during DNA extraction and sequencing reaction preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Potts, S.G.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Kremen, C.; Neumann, P.; Schweiger, O.; Kunin, W.E. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Engel, M.S. The Taxonomy of Recent and Fossil Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae; Apis). J. Hymenopt. Res. 1999, 8, 165–196. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ruttner, F. Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honey Bees; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cridland, J.M.; Tsutsui, N.D.; Ramírez, S.R. The Complex Demographic History and Evolutionary Origin of the Western Honey Bee, Apis Mellifera. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Franck, P.; Garnery, L.; Loiseau, A.; Oldroyd, B.P.; Hepburn, H.R.; Solignac, M.; Cornuet, J.M. Genetic diversity of the honey bee in Africa: Microsatellite and mitochondrial data. Heredity 2001, 86, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chahbar, N.; Muñoz, I.; Dall’Olio, R.; De la Rúa, P.; Serrano, J.; Doumandji, S. Population Structure of North African Honey Bees Is Influenced by Both Biological and Anthropogenic Factors. J. Insect Conserv. 2013, 17, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chavez-Galarza, J.; Garnery, L.; Henriques, D.; Neves, C.J.; Loucif-Ayad, W.; Jonhston, J.S.; Pinto, M.A. Mitochondrial DNA variation of Apis mellifera iberiensis: Further insights from a large-scale study using sequence data of the tRNAleu-cox2 intergenic region. Apidologie 2017, 48, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Henriques, D.; Chavez-Galarza, J.; Quaresma, A.; Neves, C.J.; Lopes, A.R.; Costa, C.; Costa, F.O.; Rufino, J.; Pinto, M.A. From the popular tRNAleu-COX2 intergenic region to the mitogenome: Insights from diverse honey bee populations of Europe and North Africa. Apidologie 2019, 50, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Buttel-Reepen, H. Contributions to the systematics biology as well as the historical and geographical distribution of honey bees (Apis mellifica L.) their variability and other Apis species. Mitt Zool Mus Berl 1906, 3, 117–201. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baldensperger, J. North African Bees.—II. Bee World 1923, 5, 189–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barour, C.; Ali, T.; Radloff, S.; Randall, H. Multivariate analysis of honey bees, Apis mellifera Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of the northeastern and southern regions of Algeria. Afr. Entomol. 2005, 13, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  12. Haddad, N.J.; Adjlane, N.; Saini, D.; Menon, A.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Jonklaas, D. Whole-genome sequencing of north African honey bee Apis mellifera intermissa to assess its benefcial traits. Entomol Res. 2018, 48, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Haccour, P. Recherche sur la race d’abeille saharienne au Maroc. Comptes Rendus Société Sci. Nat. Phys. Maroc. 1960, 6, 96–98. [Google Scholar]
  14. Adjlane, N.; Doumandji, S.E.; Haddad, N. Beekeeping in Algeria: The factors threatening the survival of the honey bee Apis mellifera intermissa. Cah. Agric. 2012, 21, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mallek, S.; Ladjali, K.; Mohammedi, A. Les Menaces Naturelles et Anthropiques Mettant en Péril l’Existence de l’Abeille Saharienne en Algérie. Bull. Société D‘Histoire Nat. D‘Afrique Nord USTHB 2018, 74, 165–196. [Google Scholar]
  16. Avise, J.C.; Arnold, J.; Ball, R.M.; Bermingham, E.; Lamb, T.; Neigel, J.E.; Reeb, C.A.; Saunders, N.C. Intraspecific Phylogeography: The Mitochondrial DNA Bridge Between Population Genetics and Systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18, 489–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Garnery, L.; Cornuet, J.M.; Solignac, M. Evolutionary history of the honey bee Apis mellifera inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Mol. Ecol. 1992, 1, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hall, H.G.; Smith, D.R. Distinguishing African and European honey bee matrilines using amplified mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 4548–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alburaki, M.; Moulin, S.; Legout, H.; Alburaki, A.; Garnery, L. Mitochondrial structure of Eastern honey bee populations from Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. Apidologie 2011, 42, 628–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Loucif-Ayad, W.; Achou, M.; Legout, H.; Alburaki, M.; Garnery, L. Genetic Assessment of Algerian Honey bee Populations by Microsatellite Markers. Apidologie 2015, 46, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garnery, L.; Solignac, M.; Celebrano, G.; Cornuet, J.M. A simple test using restricted PCR-amplified mitochondrial DNA to study the genetic structure of Apis mellifera L. Experientia 1993, 49, 1016–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meixner, M.D.; Pinto, M.A.; Bouga, M.; Kryger, P.; Ivanova, E.; Fuchs, S. Standard methods for characterizing subspecies and ecotypes of Apis mellifera. J. Apic. Res. 2013, 52, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El-Niweiri, M.A.A.; Moritz, R.F.A. Mitochondrial discrimination of honeybees (Apis mellifera) of Sudan. Apidologie 2008, 39, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Legesse, G.; Getu, E. Geographical and population diversity of African honey bees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae): A review. SINET Ethiop. J. Sci. 2022, 45, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fridi, R.; Tabet Aoul, N.; Catays, G.; Basso, B.; Bienefeld, K.; Gregorc, A.; Vignal, A.; Canale-Tabet, K. Genetic diversity and population genetic structure analysis of Apis mellifera subspecies in Algeria and Europe based on complementary sex determiner (CSD) gene. Apidologie 2022, 53, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Waterhouse, A.M.; Procter, J.B.; Martin, D.M.A.; Clamp, M.; Barton, G.J. Jalview Version 2—A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1189–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rortais, A.; Arnold, G.; Alburaki, M.; Legout, H.; Garnery, L. Review of the DraI COI-COII test for the conservation of the black honeybee (Apis mellifera mellifera). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2011, 3, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. PopArt: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wragg, D.; Marti-Marimon, M.; Basso, B.; Bidanel, J.P.; Labarthe, E.; Bouchez, O.; Le Conte, Y.; Vignal, A. Whole-genome resequencing of honey bee drones to detect genomic selection in a population managed for royal jelly. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Techer, M.A.; Clémencet, J.; Simiand, C.; Preeaduth, S.; Azali, H.A.; Reynaud, B.; Hélène, D. Large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of native honey bee Apis mellifera populations reveals a new African subgroup private to the South West Indian Ocean islands. BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cornuet, J.M.; Garnery, L.; Solignac, M. Putative origin and function of the intergenic region between COI and COII of Apis mellifera L. mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 1991, 128, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alburaki, M.; Madella, S.; Lopez, J.; Bouga, M.; Chen, Y.; vanEngelsdorp, D. Honey bee populations of the USA display restrictions in their mtDNA haplotype diversity. Front. Genet. 2023, 13, 1092121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wragg, D.; Techer, M.A.; Canale-Tabet, K.; Basso, B.; Bidanel, J.P.; Labarthe, E.; Bouchez, O.; Le Conte, Y.; Clémencet, J.; Delatte, H.; et al. Autosomal and Mitochondrial Adaptation Following Admixture: A Case Study on the Honey bees of Reunion Island. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 220–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Attia, S.S.; Chahbar, N.; Abed, F.; Oussalah, N.; Kandemir, I.; Ainouche, A.; Doumandji, S. Mitochondrial DNA variation of Algerian honey bees Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis based on COI-COII RFLP and sequencing. Res. Sq. 2023; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barour, C.; Tahar, A.; Baylac, M. Forewing Shape Variation in Algerian Honey Bee Populations of Apis mellifera intermissa (Buttel-Reepen, 1906) (Hymenoptera: Apidae): A Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics Analysis. Afr. Entomol. 2011, 19, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bendjedid, H.; Achou, M. Etude de la Diversité Morphométrique de Deux Populations d’Abeilles Domestiques (Apis mellifera intermissa et Apis mellifera sahariensis) du Sud Algérien. Synthèse Rev. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bouzeraa, H.; Sellami, H.; Gdoura, R.; Achou, M.; Soltani, N. Genetic diversity of the Honey bee Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 (Hymenoptera Apidae) from Jijel (Northeast Algeria). Biodivers. J. 2020, 11, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Achou, M.; Loucif-Ayad, W.; Legout, H.; Hmidan, H.; Alburaki, M.; Garnery, L. An Insightful Molecular Analysis Reveals Foreign Honey bees Among Algerian Honey bee Populations (Apis mellifera L.). J. Data Min. Genom. Proteom. 2015, 6, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garnery, L.; Franck, P.; Baudry, E.; Vautrin, D.; Cornuet, J.-M.; Solignac, M. Genetic diversity of the west European honey bee (Apis mellifera mellifera and A. m. iberica). I. Mitochondrial DNA. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1998, 30, S31–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salvatore, G.; Chibani Bahi Amar, A.; Canale-Tabet, K.; Fridi, R.; Tabet Aoul, N.; Saci, S.; Labarthe, E.; Palombo, V.; D’Andrea, M.; Vignal, A.; et al. Natural clines and human management impact the genetic structure of Algerian honey bee populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2023, 55, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rasolofoarivao, H.; Clémencet, J.; Techer, M.A.; Ravaomanarivo, L.H.R.; Reynaud, B.; Delatte, H. Genetic diversity of the endemic honey bee: Apis mellifera unicolor (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Madagascar. Apidologie 2015, 46, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hepburn, H.R.; Radloff, S.E. Morphometric and Pheromonal Analyses of Apis mellifera L. along a Transect from the Sahara to the Pyrenees. Apidologie 1996, 27, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smith, F.G. The Races of Honey bees in Africa. Bee World 1961, 42, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bertrand, B.; Alburaki, M.; Legout, H.; Moulin, S.; Mougel, F.; Garnery, L. MtDNA COI-COII marker and drone congregation area: An efficient method to establish and monitor honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) conservation centres. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2015, 15, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wragg, D.; Eynard, S.E.; Basso, B.; Canale-Tabet, K.; Labarthe, E.; Bouchez, O.; Bienefeld, K.; Bieńkowska, M.; Costa, C.; Gregorc, A.; et al. Complex population structure and haplotype patterns in the Western European honey bee from sequencing a large panel of haploid drones. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2022, 22, 3068–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 15 00549 g001
Figure 1. (A) Sampling sites of Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis in 20 regions in Algeria. (B) Zoom on sampling areas. Sample sizes for each sampling area are giving in (Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 1. (A) Sampling sites of Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis in 20 regions in Algeria. (B) Zoom on sampling areas. Sample sizes for each sampling area are giving in (Supplementary Table S1).
Insects 15 00549 g001
Insects 15 00549 g002
Figure 2. (A) PCR products of the mitochondrial COI-COII region, where 1–23 are Algerian samples and MT is a 100 bp ladder. (B) Overview from Jalview sequence alignment indicating the variable sites of the mtDNA COI-COII marker; the sequences correspond to the individuals in Figure 2A, displayed in the same order.
Figure 2. (A) PCR products of the mitochondrial COI-COII region, where 1–23 are Algerian samples and MT is a 100 bp ladder. (B) Overview from Jalview sequence alignment indicating the variable sites of the mtDNA COI-COII marker; the sequences correspond to the individuals in Figure 2A, displayed in the same order.
Insects 15 00549 g002
Insects 15 00549 g003
Figure 3. (A) Median-joining inferred from individuals with the P0Q intergenic structure. (B) Median-joining constructed from individuals with the P0QQQ intergenic structure.
Figure 3. (A) Median-joining inferred from individuals with the P0Q intergenic structure. (B) Median-joining constructed from individuals with the P0QQQ intergenic structure.
Insects 15 00549 g003
Insects 15 00549 g004
Figure 4. Median-joining network inferred from individuals with the P0QQ intergenic structure.
Figure 4. Median-joining network inferred from individuals with the P0QQ intergenic structure.
Insects 15 00549 g004
Table 1. Structural organization of the intergenic COI-COII marker in the studied populations.
Table 1. Structural organization of the intergenic COI-COII marker in the studied populations.
Sampling AreasIntergenic VariantPercentage of Occurrence
AlgeriaP0Q35.3%
P0QQ61.7%
P0QQQ3%
SWIO and MadagascarP0Q92.9%
Q7.1%
EuropeP0QQ3.4%
PQ13.8%
PQQ27.6%
Q55.2%
Table 2. New haplotypes identified with their GenBank accession numbers.
Table 2. New haplotypes identified with their GenBank accession numbers.
L 1GS 2SubspeciesOS 3CitiesHaplotypesGB Accession 4
AP0Qintermissa
sahariensis		AlgeriaBiskra; AinSefra; Bejaia; Chlef; Bayadh; TissemssiletA1xPP667401
AP0QintermissaAlgeriaBejaiaA8kPP667402
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaMascara; Mostaganem; RelizaneA68PP667403
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaMostaganemA69PP667404
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaBejaiaA70PP667405
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaSidibelabesA71aPP667406
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaSidibelabes; RelizaneA72PP667407
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaChlef; Sidibelabes; MostaganemA73PP667408
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaMascaraA70aPP667409
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaMascaraA74aPP667410
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaMostaganemA73aPP667411
AP0QQintermissa
sahariensis		AlgeriaBayadh; Mostaganem;
Tlemcen Oran; Relizane; Ghardaia; Djelfa		A74PP667412
AP0QQsahariensisAlgeriaDjelfaA74bPP667413
AP0QQsahariensisAlgeriaAinSefraA75PP667414
AP0QQintermissaAlgeriaSidibelabesA76PP667415
AP0QQQintermissaAlgeriaMascaraA77′PP667416
MPQQmelliferaFranceNA 5M4rPP667417
1 L: Lineages; 2 GS: Genetic structure; 3 OS: Origin of samples; 4 GB Accession: GenBank accession; 5 NA: Not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chibani Bahi Amar, A.; Tabet Aoul, N.; Fridi, R.; Vignal, A.; Canale-Tabet, K. New COI-COII mtDNA Region Haplotypes in the Endemic Honey Bees Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Algeria. Insects 2024, 15, 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070549

AMA Style

Chibani Bahi Amar A, Tabet Aoul N, Fridi R, Vignal A, Canale-Tabet K. New COI-COII mtDNA Region Haplotypes in the Endemic Honey Bees Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Algeria. Insects. 2024; 15(7):549. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070549

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chibani Bahi Amar, Amira, Nacera Tabet Aoul, Riad Fridi, Alain Vignal, and Kamila Canale-Tabet. 2024. "New COI-COII mtDNA Region Haplotypes in the Endemic Honey Bees Apis mellifera intermissa and Apis mellifera sahariensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Algeria" Insects 15, no. 7: 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070549

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop