Next Article in Journal
Influence of Current Density upon Hydrogenation on the Shape Memory Effect of Binary TiNi Alloy Single Crystals
Previous Article in Journal
Solid-State Welding of Aluminum to Magnesium Alloys: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vanadium and Nickel Recovery from the Products of Heavy Petroleum Feedstock Processing: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Metal Recovery and Separation from Wastes

Collaborative Innovation Center of Steel Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2023, 13(8), 1411; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13081411
Submission received: 19 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 7 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Recovery and Separation from Wastes)

1. Introduction and Scope

With the development of society, large amounts of solid waste (slag, sludge, tailing, electronic waste, etc.) are generated every year. Each type of waste contains specific metals, such as As, Cr, V, Cu, Pb, and Zn, which are valuable resources and are also harmful to the environment. Currently, problems regarding the environment have increasingly attracted widespread attention as the global interest in these issues increases. If the metals in waste are not recovered effectively, not only are the resources wasted, but the environment is also seriously polluted.
The current processes for recovering metals (V, Cr, Ti, Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, Al, As, Nb, Mg, Au, etc.) from wastes (slag, sludge, tailing, electronic waste, etc.) include gravimetric, magnetic, floatation, pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, bioleaching, chlorination, and electrolysis methods, etc. [1,2,3].

2. Contributions

Eleven research articles and three review articles were published in this Special Issue of Metals. The main topics covered include:
Cu from wasted CPU sockets was efficient recovered via slurry electrolysis [4]. The valuable metals (Ti, Fe, Mn, etc.) were extracted from vanadium slag by means of chlorination or an oxalic-acid hydrothermal leachate [5,6]. Karshyga et al. report the development of a technology intended to process electric smelting dusts of ilmenite concentrate with the extraction of silicon and titanium and the production of products in the form of their dioxides [7]. Fang et al. investigate the vacuum carbon reducing iron oxide scale to prepare porous 316 stainless steel [8]. Tin from Tin-bearing iron concentrate was removed via roasting in an atmosphere containing SO2 and CO [9]. Mill scale and aluminum dross are the industrial wastes from steel and aluminum industries, which have high concentrations of Fe2O3 and Al2O3, respectively. Wongsawan reports the synthesis of ferroalloys via mill scale-dross-graphite [10]. Hosseinipour et al. investigate the significant factors of Se and/or Te recovery in the copper cementation process using the response surface methodology [11]. Current state-of-the-art milling methods also lead to the presence of significantly more reactive polymers still adhered to milled target metal particles. Blumbergs et al. find a novel and double-step disintegration–milling approach that can obtain metal-rich particle fractions from e-waste [12]. In order to solve the problem of solid waste pollution from basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag, Lan et al. investigated oxidation reconstruction of BOF slag and alcohol wet magnetic separation recovery of iron. Compared with the initial steel slag, the iron grade increased by 8.22%, and the iron recovery increased by 46.38% compared with direct magnetic separation without oxidation [13]. Ti from Ti-bearing electric furnaces slag was leached by a [NH4+]-[F] solution, providing the foundation for industrialization [14].
Vishnyakov reviews the recent developments in the recovery of vanadium and nickel from the heavy petroleum feedstock (HPF) as a raw source of metals [15]. Yudaev and Chistyakov review the efficiency and selectivity of the extractants in the recovery of metals from industrial wastewater, soil, spent raw materials, and the separation of metal mixtures [16]. Liu et al. reviews the research progress of chlorination in the treatment of vanadium-containing materials [17].

3. Conclusions and Outlook

The purpose of this Special Issue is to focus on the current state-of-the-art ideas, methods, technologies, etc., for utilizing waste. This Special Issue provides a very good reference for the effective utilization of solid wastes. To minimize production costs and environmental impacts, it will be more and more necessary to use cleaner and more economical methods to recover metals from wastes.
The Guest Editor would like to thank the authors who contributed the manuscripts, the reviewers who took time out from their busy schedules to review the papers, and the journal.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support of this work from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52274406, 51904286, 51922003), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRF-TP-19-004C1) and Interdisciplinary Research Project for Young Teachers of USTB (Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities FRF-IDRY-21-015).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, S.; Wang, L.; He, X.; Chou, K. Insight into the oxidation mechanisms of vanadium slag and its application in the separation of V and Cr. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 405, 136981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, S.; Ye, L.; Wang, L.; Chou, K. Selective oxidation of vanadium from vanadium slag by CO2 during CaCO3 roasting treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 312, 123407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, S.; He, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L. Cleaner and effective extraction and separation of iron from vanadium slag by carbothermic reduction-chlorination-molten salt electrolysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.; Li, M.; Tang, J. Efficient Recovery of Cu from Wasted CPU Sockets by Slurry Electrolysis. Metals 2023, 13, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Du, J.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Chou, K.-C. Mechanism of Selective Chlorination of Fe from Fe2SiO4 and FeV2O4 Based on Density Functional Theory. Metals 2023, 13, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miao, Q.; Li, M.; Gao, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Yan, B. Improved Process for Separating TiO2 from an Oxalic-Acid Hydrothermal Leachate of Vanadium Slag. Metals 2023, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karshyga, Z.; Ultarakova, A.; Lokhova, N.; Yessengaziyev, A.; Kassymzhanov, K.; Myrzakulov, M. Technology for Complex Processing of Electric Smelting Dusts of Ilmenite Concentrates to Produce Titanium Dioxide and Amorphous Silica. Metals 2022, 12, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, F.; Peng, J.; Chang, H.; Wang, Y. Vacuum Carbon Reducing Iron Oxide Scale to Prepare Porous 316 Stainless Steel. Metals 2022, 12, 2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, L.; Xu, Z.; Wang, S. Tin Removal from Tin-Bearing Iron Concentrate with a Roasting in an Atmosphere of SO2 and CO. Metals 2022, 12, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wongsawan, P.; Srichaisiriwech, W.; Kongkarat, S. Synthesis of Ferroalloys via Mill Scale-Dross-Graphite Interaction: Implication for Industrial Wastes Upcycling. Metals 2022, 12, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hosseinipour, S.; Keshavarz Alamdari, E.; Sadeghi, N. Selenium and Tellurium Separation: Copper Cementation Evaluation Using Response Surface Methodology. Metals 2022, 12, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blumbergs, E.; Serga, V.; Shishkin, A.; Goljandin, D.; Shishko, A.; Zemcenkovs, V.; Markus, K.; Baronins, J.; Pankratov, V. Selective Disintegration–Milling to Obtain Metal-Rich Particle Fractions from E-Waste. Metals 2022, 12, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lan, M.; He, Z.; Hu, X. Optimization of Iron Recovery from BOF Slag by Oxidation and Magnetic Separation. Metals 2022, 12, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, F.; Guo, Y.; Chen, F.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Qiu, G. Fluoride Leaching of Titanium from Ti-Bearing Electric Furnace Slag in [NH4+]-[F] Solution. Metals 2021, 11, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vishnyakov, A. Vanadium and Nickel Recovery from the Products of Heavy Petroleum Feedstock Processing: A Review. Metals 2023, 13, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yudaev, P.; Chistyakov, E. Chelating Extractants for Metals. Metals 2022, 12, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, S.; Xue, W.; Wang, L. Extraction of the Rare Element Vanadium from Vanadium-Containing Materials by Chlorination Method: A Critical Review. Metals 2021, 11, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Liu, S. Metal Recovery and Separation from Wastes. Metals 2023, 13, 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13081411

AMA Style

Wang L, Liu S. Metal Recovery and Separation from Wastes. Metals. 2023; 13(8):1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13081411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Lijun, and Shiyuan Liu. 2023. "Metal Recovery and Separation from Wastes" Metals 13, no. 8: 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13081411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop