Next Article in Journal
Damage Detection in Multiple RC Structures Based on Embedded Ultrasonic Sensors and Wavelet Transform
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy Rating of Buildings to Promote Energy-Conscious Design in Israel
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Seismic Vulnerability of Hospitals in the Tehran Metropolitan Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Retrofitting Solutions: Remedial Wall Ties for Masonry Enclosure Brick Walls
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Office Distractions and the Productivity of Building Users: The Effect of Workgroup Sizes and Demographic Characteristics

1
Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia
2
School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
3
School of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2021, 11(2), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020055
Submission received: 24 December 2020 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 2 February 2021 / Published: 6 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buildings: 10th Anniversary)

Abstract

Knowledge workers are experiencing ever-increasing distractions or unwanted interruptions at workplaces. We explored the effect of unwanted interruptions on an individual’s perceived productivity in various building types, user groups and workgroups. A case study of 68 buildings and their 5149 occupants using the Building Use Studies methodology was employed in this study. The database contains information on the occupants’ perceptions of physical and environmental parameters, including unmined data on the frequency of unwanted interruptions. Pearson’s correlation was used to test the correlation between the variables. In order to determine whether there are any statistically significant differences between the means of two or more independent (unrelated) groups, one-way ANOVA was employed to examine the significance of differences in mean scores between various user groups and workgroups. The evidence of clear correlations between the frequency of unwanted interruptions and perceived productivity is detailed in various user groups and in multiple building types. The Pearson correlation coefficients were −0.361 and −0.348 for sustainable and conventional buildings, respectively, demonstrating a lower sensitivity to unwanted interruptions in sustainable buildings. Females and older participants were more sensitive to unwanted interruptions and their productivity levels were reduced much more by unwanted interruptions. Comparing different sized workgroups, the highest sensitivity to unwanted interruptions for occupants in offices shared with more than 8 people was found. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of different user needs and preferences in the design of workplaces.
Keywords: productivity; interruptions; workgroups; demographics; offices productivity; interruptions; workgroups; demographics; offices

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khoshbakht, M.; Rasheed, E.O.; Baird, G. Office Distractions and the Productivity of Building Users: The Effect of Workgroup Sizes and Demographic Characteristics. Buildings 2021, 11, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020055

AMA Style

Khoshbakht M, Rasheed EO, Baird G. Office Distractions and the Productivity of Building Users: The Effect of Workgroup Sizes and Demographic Characteristics. Buildings. 2021; 11(2):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khoshbakht, Maryam, Eziaku O. Rasheed, and George Baird. 2021. "Office Distractions and the Productivity of Building Users: The Effect of Workgroup Sizes and Demographic Characteristics" Buildings 11, no. 2: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020055

APA Style

Khoshbakht, M., Rasheed, E. O., & Baird, G. (2021). Office Distractions and the Productivity of Building Users: The Effect of Workgroup Sizes and Demographic Characteristics. Buildings, 11(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop