Next Article in Journal
Green Land Use Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Resource-Based Cities in the Yellow River Basin under Carbon Emission Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Seismic Analysis of Baffle-Reinforced Elevated Storage Tank Using Finite Element Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall with Deformed Steel Bars Embedded in Tire Shred-Sand Mixture

Buildings 2022, 12(5), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050548
by Beenish Jehan Khan 1,*, Mahmood Ahmad 2,3, Mohanad Muayad Sabri Sabri 4,*, Irshad Ahmad 5, Bakht Zamin 1 and Mariusz Niekurzak 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Buildings 2022, 12(5), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050548
Submission received: 13 March 2022 / Revised: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see the file attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references,and the research design is appropriate.What's more, the methods are adequately described and the results are clearly presented, so the conclusions are supported by the results.
In my opinion,it can be accepted in present form.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper presents the experimental and numerical analysis behavior on Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall (MSE). The overall quality of is OK but the tests results are not well-presented. The numerical study seems insufficient and needs to be further supplemented.

 

  1. The introduction is so length, the author may decompose one paragraph into several and group the past research according to its respective topic.
  2. 5 (a) and (b) are not clear.
  3. According to conclusion 3, the numerical does not generate close prediction to the test result. In the case, how to demonstrate the accuracy of the numerical model?
  4. Normally, there should be parametric study to further evaluate the effect of each parameter after the validation and calibration of numerical model.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

have revised according to comments

Back to TopTop