Next Article in Journal
A Scientometric Analysis of Studies on Risk Management in Construction Projects
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study on Technical Standards for the Design of Emergency Medical Facilities in China in the Context of COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Performance Analysis of Concrete-Filled Hollow GFRP Beams including Inner Surface Bearing Stresses at the Interface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Temporal and Spatial Evolution Laws of County Green Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from 11 Counties in Sichuan Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Construction by Considering the Regional Differences in Carbon Emission Factors of Cement: The Case of China

1
China Merchants Chongqing Highway Engineering Testing Center Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400060, China
2
School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
3
School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
4
School of Management Science and Engineering, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(9), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091341
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022

Abstract

:
Rapid road construction and expansion in China resulted in massive GHG emissions. The carbon emission factors of raw materials, particularly cement, have a significant influence on the calculation of GHG emissions from road construction. This study estimates GHG emissions from road construction by taking into account regional differences in cement carbon emission factors. The results indicate that (1) total GHG emissions from road construction have a “U” shape from 2009 to 2019, with the highest level being 437 million t CO2e 2009 and the lowest level being 184 million t CO2e in 2017; (2) Class-Ⅳ roads account for roughly 80% of total GHG emissions from road construction; and (3) GHG emissions from road construction are shifting from east to west regions. This is the first paper to calculate GHG emissions from road construction by taking into account both road type and cement carbon emission factors. The findings of this study could provide references for transportation agencies to better understand the impacts of road construction to climate change and improve policymaking, especially for the development of road construction technologies and raw material production technologies.

1. Introduction

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have long been a source of concern around the world due to their contribution to climate change, which endangers the natural and human environment and ecosystems [1]. Many countries have devised strategies to reduce GHG emissions. China has announced that it will reach a peak in carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 [2]. Roads, as an important mode of transportation, emit considerable amounts of GHG throughout their entire life cycle [3]. Large amounts of roads have been built in recent years all over the world, particularly in developing countries, and over 25 million kilometers of new roads will be built by 2050 [4]. As the world’s largest developing country, China faces a significant challenge of increasing GHG emissions due to its extensive road network [5].
During the life cycle of road projects, the construction phase accounts for the majority of GHG emissions [6]. Road construction has been shown to consume a lot of resources in Europe [7] and contribute significantly to GHG emissions in the United States [8]. Activities such as materials extraction and production, to-site transportation, and construction machinery generate emissions that account for 5% to 25% of the total emissions from road transport during the construction stage [9]. Between 2009 and 2019, the length of China’s roads increased from 3.86 million kilometers to 5.01 million kilometers [10]. Given the continued high demand for passenger and good transportation, road construction, reconstruction, and expansion are likely to remain a major issue for some time [11]. In recent years, China has taken many energy saving and emission reduction measures in the road construction stage, such as warm mix asphalt technology, waste recycling technology, photovoltaic pavement technology, etc., but these technologies are not mature enough [12]. As a result, environmental impacts and GHG emissions from road construction will receive increased attention.
Numerous studies on GHG emissions from road construction have been conducted. Stripple [13] estimated GHG emissions from roads for the first time using LCA method and discovered that activities during the construction stage dominate total GHG emissions. Karlsson, Rootzén, and Johnsson [14] assessed the potential for reducing CO2 emissions of road construction and alternative abatement measures to realize the potential. Loijos, Santero, and Ochsendorf [15] investigated GHG emissions from roads in the United States and discovered that cement production was the major sources of emissions. Many studies in China estimated GHG emissions from road construction in different regions. Li et al. [16] investigated the endogenous carbon dioxide emissions from tunnel construction machinery in China. Wang et al. [17] used a case study in China’s southwest region to estimate carbon dioxide emissions from highway construction. Chen et al. [18] applied LCA to calculate the GHG emissions from road construction at the province-level. However, these studies failed to take into account the effects of raw material production in different regions on emissions. The source of raw materials has a significant impact on the calculation result of GHG emissions from road construction because raw material production and transportation vary with the level and location of production.
China, as the world’s largest cement producer, contributes roughly 60% of the global total and emits a significant amount of GHG [19]. Furthermore, the cement industry is an important source of CO2 emissions in China, accounting for 14.3% of total CO2 emissions in this country [20]. Cement, unlike other materials, is typically produced in local cement factories and transported to sites. According to Zhao et al. [21], differences in the quality of limestone for cement and the type of coal used in the cement production line caused carbon emission coefficient differences between provinces and regions. As a result, the impact of spatial variability on cement production carbon emission factors is significant and cannot be overlooked.
The type of road also has an impact on the outcome of the calculation of GHG emissions from road construction. Different road types, such as highway [22], interstate road [23], interurban road [24], and rural road [25], are used to calculate carbon emissions. The road structure in China divides roads six hierarchies: expressways, Class-Ⅰ roads, Class-Ⅱ roads, Class-Ⅲ roads and Class-Ⅳ roads. It was reported that expressways, Class-Ⅰ roads, and Class-Ⅱ roads are mostly paved with asphalt. Cement concrete pavements are used on Class-Ⅲ roads and half of Class-Ⅳ roads [18]. Carbon emissions from different types of roads vary greatly due to differences in construction scale, construction environment, and construction technologies.
Existing studies have laid a solid foundation for calculating GHG emissions from road construction. However, the impact of regional differences in raw material production is still unclear. To fill such a gap, with the aim to make this work a support for improving calculation accuracy, this study took regions differences in carbon emission factors of cement when estimating GHG emissions from road construction. Moreover, road type was taken into account when analyzing the sources of GHG emissions from road construction. The following are the main questions that we hope to address through this study. (1) What are the regional differences in carbon emission factors for road construction? (2) How do the GHG emissions from road construction differ between different road types? (3) What are the regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction? Addressing these questions would help to put forward road construction technologies and raw material production technologies from the perspective of GHG emission mitigation. In order to address these issues, the research steps are as follows. First, the system boundary, GHG, and measurement methods were defined. Second, the raw material mass density was calculated by combining the road structure of each road type. Third, carbon emission factors were calculated by taking regional differences in the production of cement into account. Finally, GHG emissions from road construction in China was estimated. In this way, regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction and differences between road types were discussed and policies were suggested in the final section.

2. Methodology

2.1. System Boundary

This study calculates the GHG emissions from road construction. The components and steps included within the system boundary for this study are depicted in Figure 1. The system consumes materials and energy and emits GHG. GHG emissions from road construction are calculated using both asphalt and cement pavements. The calculation of asphalt pavements includes two major processes: raw material production and pavement construction. The construction process includes the phases of mixing, mixture transportation, laying down, compacting, and curing. The calculation for cement pavements includes three major processes: raw materials production, concrete manufacturing, and pavement construction. Due to data limitations, the pavement construction process includes Portland cement concrete (PCC), but excludes earthwork and the construction of road base and subbase [26].

2.2. Data

2.2.1. GHG and Measurement

The GHG in this study includes CO2, CH4, and N2O, which account for 98.9% of carbon emissions from road construction [27]. Global warming potential (GWP) is a widely used characterization method for measuring the impacts of GHG emissions on climate change, and it is used in this work to normalize GHG emissions of these gases by carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e).

2.2.2. Mass Density of Raw Materials

As illustrated in Figure 2, a typical road has three layers. The surface of an asphalt pavement is made of hot mixture asphalt course, the base is made of cement stabilized aggregate, and the subbase is made of cement stabilized gravel. A cement pavement has a cement concrete surface, a cement stabilized aggregate base, and a cement stabilized gravel subbase. The slope of the road is 1:1.5 [28].The thickness of each layer are derived from the Ministry of Transport [29], which provides the Chinese road structure standard, as shown in Table 1.
Combining data from previous studies on road size and material components of each layer [18,21,30], mass density of each layer are obtained, as shown in Figure 3.

2.2.3. Carbon Emission Factors

As stated in the system boundary section, the GHG emissions from road construction are primarily caused by two phases: raw materials production and construction process. For both cement pavement and asphalt pavement, cement is an essential material. In this work, we cite carbon emission factors data from Zhao et al. [21], who sampled 198 new dry process cement production lines in China and measured the spatial variability of cement production carbon emission factors, as shown in Figure 3. On this basis, we used data from Shaanxi Province [26] as the baseline and calculated the carbon emission factors of cement production for each province and region according to the differences in Figure 4. The final carbon emission factors for each province and region are presented in Figure 5.
Carbon emission factors for other raw materials are derived from previous studies [18,30], as shown in Table 2.
The carbon emission factors of each road structure in each province and region during construction phase are obtained by combining the information in Table 1, Figure 1, and Table 2, as shown in Table 3. The figures with dark blue backgrounds represent the lowest and highest levels of carbon emission factors of asphalt pavement. The figures with dark gray backgrounds represent the lowest and highest levels of carbon emission factors of cement pavement.

2.3. Model

The GHG emissions from road construction are influenced by two factors: carbon emission factor and the length of the road. The GHG emissions from road construction for each type of road are calculated by multiplying the carbon emission factor of each road type by its length.
Equation (1) shows that the total GHG emissions from road construction of a region are obtained by summing GHG emissions of all types of road in this region up.
G E j = i E F i , j L i , j .
where GEj is the total GHG emissions from road construction of region j (tCO2e), EFi,j is the carbon emission factor of type i road in region j (tCO2e/km), and Li,j is the length of type i road in region j (km).
Equation (2) shows that the total GHG emissions from one type of road construction are obtained by summing GHG emissions of this type of road in all regions up.
G E i = j E F i , j L i , j .
where GEi is the total GHG emissions from road construction of type i road (tCO2e), EFi,j is the carbon emission factor of type i road in region j (tCO2e/km), and Li,j is the length of type i road in region j (km).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. GHG Emissions from the Construction Phase of Different Types of Roads

Figure 6 depicts the GHG emissions from the construction phase of various types of roads and Table 4 gives detailed figures in Figure 6. Total GHG emissions shows a “U” shape from 2009 to 2019. The figure ranges from 180 to 440 million t CO2e. Compared with other years, GHG emissions from road construction were the highest in 2009, at 437 million t CO2e, and the lowest in 2017, at 184 million t CO2e. It shows a remarkable decline from 2009 to 2011, a relatively stable period from 2011 to 2017, and a steady increase from 2017 to 2019. Compared with developed countries, the total amount is much higher [31]. As the largest emerging economy, China has invested heavily in transportation infrastructure, including roads. Huang et al. [31] pointed out that the construction of infrastructure and buildings in emerging economies cause about 60% of the total GHG emissions in the construction sector. GHG emissions from road construction in China are significant.
It is indicated that the GHG emissions from Class-Ⅳ road construction are estimated to be the largest source of total GHG emissions. According to the results, GHG emissions from Class-Ⅳ road construction account for roughly 80% of the total. However, the construction length of Class-Ⅳ roads only account for roughly 60% of the total [32]. GHG emissions from Class-Ⅳ road construction exceeded the total GHG emissions of other road types. Despite the rapid development of high-speed roads in China, Class-Ⅳ roads form a road network in nearly every corner of the country and play an important role in national unity, local management, resource development, and poverty alleviation. In recent years, the scale of Class-Ⅳ road has rapidly expanded to keep up with the rate of economic development [33,34], especially for the development of rural areas. However, the population in poor and rural areas remains large, and Class-Ⅳ roads will continue to be an important public facility for getting people out of the mountainous areas and to the nearest town for a long time in the future. It is clear that the key to reducing GHG emissions from road construction in China is to reduce GHG emissions from Class-Ⅳ road construction.

3.2. Regional Differences in GHG Emissions from Road Construction

Figure 7 depicts the regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction in China. Western regions had higher GHG emissions from road construction than eastern regions between 2009 and 2019. This result contradicts Chen et al. [18]’s findings, which showed that eastern coastal regions had higher per square kilometer GHG emissions than western regions. The reason for this is that Chen et al. [18] used cumulative GHG emissions from road construction up to 2013. According to Chen et al. [18], the potential for new road construction in western regions is enormous, and the majority of road construction occurred in western regions during 2009–2019.
It is also indicated in Figure 7 that GHG emissions from road construction are shifting from east to west regions. When the years 2009 and 2019 are compared, almost all of the eastern regions on the map have changed from yellow to green in 2019, while many provinces in the western region have turned orange, indicating a significant decrease of GHG emissions in eastern regions and increase in western regions. Transportation infrastructure is widely regarded as a valuable tool for a region’s economic development [35]. Since the reform and opening up policy was implemented in 1978, the eastern regions have experienced rapid economic growth, and there is a polarization between eastern coastal and inland regions [36]. Later policy centered on western region development resulted in a large amount of transportation infrastructure construction in western regions. As a result, the center of GHG emissions from roads shifted from the east to the west.
However, some provinces, such as Sichuan, Hubei, Yunnan, Guizhou, and Anhui, maintained high levels of GHG emissions from road construction (with an average amount of about 10–25 million t CO2e per square kilometer). GHG emissions from road construction in these five provinces accounted for 48% of national emissions in 2017. These provinces had poor transportation conditions in the past due to their topography, which all have large areas of mountainous regions. Road construction in a mountainous area is usually thought to emit more GHG emissions than in other regions. However, due to the limitation of data, the influence of topographic condition on GHG emissions from road construction was ignored. According to Liu et al. [37], building a road in the mountainous requires deep-cutting and high-filling subgrades, as well as additional slope protection work. Liu et al. [37] also stated that road construction projects in mountainous areas are time-consuming and material-intensive. Furthermore, topography influences the construction schedule, equipment, and material selection of a road construction project, all of which are closely related to the projects’ GHG emissions [6,23]. As a result, GHG emissions from road construction in these mountainous areas was underestimated. In addition, as a result of the large amount of road construction in these areas, it is expected that GHG emissions from road construction will remain high.

4. Policy Implications

From a policy standpoint, China has implemented numerous policies to reduce GHG emissions from road traffic. However, given the vast amount of road construction in China, GHG emissions from the construction phase should not be overlooked. We make three policy recommendations based on the findings of this study.
The first is to develop localized policies to reduce GHG emissions from road construction. According to our findings, there are significant regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction. As a result, the national government should establish reasonable GHG emission reduction goals based on the reality of road construction in different regions. Meanwhile, provinces with higher levels of GHG emissions, such as Sichuan and Yunnan, may place a greater emphasis on GHG emissions from road construction than those with lower levels.
The second measure is to promote GHG-emission-reducing road construction technologies for Class-Ⅳ roads. According to the findings of this study, the construction of Class-Ⅳ roads emits the most GHG. Furthermore, as Liu et al. [37] pointed out, road construction in mountainous areas emits more GHG than other areas. More specific policies should be developed in this regard in order to improve technologies, such as developing technical solutions that require less cutting and filling, increasing the energy efficiency of construction equipment, and encouraging the economical use of materials under the premise of ensuring the construction plan.
The third measure is to establish policies regarding advanced layout of road construction support facilities and make improvements regarding raw material production. Our study demonstrates that there are regional differences in the carbon emission factors of road construction raw materials, resulting in regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction. As a result, on the one hand, the allocation of raw material production plants would better meet the proximity principle. Regions with higher carbon emission factors for raw materials, on the other hand, should consider increasing the level of emission reduction for raw material production. Mitigation measurements include material use and mass handling requirements optimization, increased recycling of steel, asphalt, and aggregates, and increased use of alternative binders in concrete [14].

5. Conclusions

China is now emitting a large amount of GHG emissions due to rapid road construction and expansion, and some researchers have paid attention to this issue. These studies, however, did not take into account the impacts of raw material production in different regions on emissions. The level and location of production influence raw material production and transportation. Differences in carbon emission coefficients between provinces and regions were caused by differences in the quality of limestone for cement and the type of coal used in the cement production line. This study estimates GHG emissions from road construction by taking into account regional differences in cement carbon emission factors. The study’s main contribution is to provide a more considerate method to calculate GHG emissions from road construction in China.
Our analysis reveals that total GHG emissions from road construction decreased dramatically from 2009 to 2011, remained relatively stable from 2011 to 2017, and increased steadily from 2017 to 2019. It peaked at 437 million t CO2e in 2009 and peaked at 184 million t CO2e in 2017. Class-Ⅳ roads are the largest source of total GHG emissions from road construction, accounting for roughly 80% of the total. Because the majority of road construction occurred in western regions from 2009 to 2019, the western regions had higher GHG emissions from road construction than the eastern regions. Furthermore, GHG emissions from road construction are shifting from east to west regions as a result of policy preferences focusing on the development of western regions. Because construction technologies are more difficult in mountainous areas, road construction emits more GHG than in other areas. Three policy recommendations were raised based on the research findings, including developing localized GHG emission reduction policies for road construction, promoting the construction technologies of Class-Ⅳ roads, and advancing the layout of road construction support facilities. In this study, we estimated the GHG emissions from road construction. Although this makes an improvement compared with existing studies that ignored regional differences in carbon emission factors of cement, the calculation result is still not accurate enough. On one hand, future research should broaden the system boundary to include earthwork and the construction of road base and subbase during the pavement construction stage. On the other hand, more accurate estimations should take into account roads’ topographic conditions.

Author Contributions

Investigation, project administration, supervision and writing-original draft, C.Y.; data curation, formal analysis, visualization and writing-original draft, L.W.; methodology, software, writing-review & editing, Y.L.; resources, writing-review & editing, K.Y.; formal analysis and validation, G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Pan, S.-Y.; Li, H.; Cai, J.; Olabi, A.G.; Anthony, E.J.; Manovic, V. Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 125, 109799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shi, X.; Zheng, Y.; Lei, Y.; Xue, W.; Yan, G.; Liu, X.; Cai, B.; Tong, D.; Wang, J. Air quality benefits of achieving carbon neutrality in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fernández-Sánchez, G.; Berzosa, Á.; Barandica, J.M.; Cornejo, E.; Serrano, J.M. Opportunities for GHG emissions reduction in road projects: A comparative evaluation of emissions scenarios using Co2NSTRUCT. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 104, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Laurance, W.F.; Clements, G.R.; Sloan, S.; O’Connell, C.S.; Mueller, N.D.; Goosem, M.; Venter, O.; Edwards, D.P.; Phalan, B.; Balmford, A.; et al. Erratum: Corrigendum: A global strategy for road building. Nature 2014, 514, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schweikert, A.; Chinowsky, P.; Kwiatkowski, K.; Espinet, X. The infrastructure planning support system: Analyzing the impact of climate change on road infrastructure and development. Transp. Policy 2014, 35, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barandica, J.M.; Fernández-Sánchez, G.; Berzosa, Á.; Delgado, J.A.; Acosta, F.J. Applying life cycle thinking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road projects. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 57, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Melanta, S.; Miller-Hooks, E.; Avetisyan, H.G. Carbon Footprint Estimation Tool for Transportation Construction Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2013, 139, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, Y.; Bird, R.N.; Heidrich, O. A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 52, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jullien, A.; Dauvergne, M.; Cerezo, V. Environmental assessment of road construction and maintenance policies using LCA. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2014, 29, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. NBS (National Bureay of Statistics of China). China Statistical Yearbook 2020; National Bureay of Statistics of China: Beijing, China, 2020.
  11. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, D. Estimation and uncertainty analysis on carbon dioxide emissions from construction phase of real highway projects in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 144, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.; Su, C.; Wang, C.; Jing, P.; Hou, Y. Overview of energy saving and emission reduction issues and technologies in road infrastructure construction. J. Beijing Univ. Technol. 2022, 48, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stripple, H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. In A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute: Gothenburg, Sweden, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  14. Karlsson, I.; Rootzén, J.; Johnsson, F. Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains—Analysis of a Swedish road construction project. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 120, 109651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Loijos, A.; Santero, N.; Ochsendorf, J. Life cycle climate impacts of the US concrete pavement network. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 72, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, H.; Zhong, P.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, J. Calculation of Endogenous Carbon Dioxide Emission during Highway Tunnel Construction: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection, Xi’an, China, 20–22 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, X.; Duan, Z.; Wu, L.; Yang, D. Estimation of carbon dioxide emission in highway construction: A case study in southwest region of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, J.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Z.; Ou, X.; Hao, H. Greenhouse gas emissions from road construction in China: A province-level analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Ren, H.; Zhou, W.; Yu, Y.; Chen, C. Assessing air pollution abatement co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in cement industry: A city level analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bai, M. Research on the path of achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China’s cement industry. Price Theory Pract. 2021, 4, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, J.; Zheng, Z.; Cao, Z.; Yao, J. Spatial and causal analysis of discrepancies in CO2 emission factors for cement production among provinces in China. Resour. Sci. 2016, 38, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Park, K.; Hwang, Y.; Seo, S.; Seo, H. Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cycle of Highways. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2003, 129, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cass, D.; Mukherjee, A. Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Highway Construction Operations by Using a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Approach: Case Study for Pavement Operations. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2011, 137, 1015–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Galatioto, F.; Huang, Y.; Parry, T.; Bird, R.; Bell, M. Traffic modelling in system boundary expansion of road pavement life cycle assessment. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2015, 36, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Celauro, C.; Corriere, F.; Guerrieri, M.; Casto, B.L. Environmentally appraising different pavement and construction scenarios: A comparative analysis for a typical local road. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 34, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, F.; Sha, A.; Yang, P.; Huang, Y. The Greenhouse Gas Emission from Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Construction in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2016, 13, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.; Ye, K.; Wu, L.; Chen, D. Estimating quantity and equity of carbon emission from roads based on an improved LCA approach: The case of China. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2022, 27, 759–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Liu, W. Analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emission of asphalt pavement construction materials in construction period. Highway 2015, 1, 100–107. [Google Scholar]
  29. MOT (Ministry of Transport). Transport Statistical Yearbook 2013; Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2013.
  30. Ma, F.; Sha, A.; Lin, R.; Huang, Y.; Wang, C. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Asphalt Pavement Construction: A Case Study in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Huang, L.; Krigsvoll, G.; Johansen, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. MOT (Ministry of Transport). China Transport Statistics Yearbook 2019; MOT (Ministry of Transport): Beijing, China, 2019.
  33. Wu, L.; Ye, K.; Gong, P.; Xing, J. Perceptions of governments towards mitigating the environmental impacts of expressway construction projects: A case of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, L.; Yoon, S.; Ye, K. Modeling contractors’ ecological protection efforts determination for expressway construction projects. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2021, 91, 106669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, Y.; Tong, C.; Wang, Y. Road construction, economic growth, and poverty alleviation in China. Growth Chang. 2022, 0, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ferrier, R.C.; Jenkins, A.; Yuan, J.; Bailey, M.J.; et al. Forty years of reform and opening up: China’s progress toward a sustainable path. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau9413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Yu, Q. Life cycle assessment for carbon dioxide emissions from freeway construction in mountainous area: Primary source, cut-off determination of system boundary. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 140, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. System boundary of this study.
Figure 1. System boundary of this study.
Buildings 12 01341 g001
Figure 2. Typical structure of asphalt and cement pavement.
Figure 2. Typical structure of asphalt and cement pavement.
Buildings 12 01341 g002
Figure 3. Mass density of raw materials of cement and asphalt pavement.
Figure 3. Mass density of raw materials of cement and asphalt pavement.
Buildings 12 01341 g003
Figure 4. Difference of cement process carbon emission (PC) coefficient and fuel carbon emission coefficient (FC) between 31 provinces.
Figure 4. Difference of cement process carbon emission (PC) coefficient and fuel carbon emission coefficient (FC) between 31 provinces.
Buildings 12 01341 g004
Figure 5. Carbon factors of cement production in 31 provinces.
Figure 5. Carbon factors of cement production in 31 provinces.
Buildings 12 01341 g005
Figure 6. GHG emissions from the construction of road each type during 2009–2019.
Figure 6. GHG emissions from the construction of road each type during 2009–2019.
Buildings 12 01341 g006
Figure 7. Regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction during 2009–2019.
Figure 7. Regional differences in GHG emissions from road construction during 2009–2019.
Buildings 12 01341 g007
Table 1. Road structure in China.
Table 1. Road structure in China.
LanesLane Width (m)Path Width (m)Asphalt Pavement Thickness (m)Cement Pavement Thickness (m)
PavementBaseSubgradePavementBaseSubgrade
Expressway43.7515.000.180.400.200.260.300.20
63.7522.50
83.7530.00
Class-Ⅰ43.7515.000.150.400.200.240.300.20
Class-Ⅱ23.757.500.090.200.200.220.200.20
Class-Ⅲ23.507.000.060.200.200.200.200.20
Class-Ⅳ23.006.000.040.200.150.160.150.15
Table 2. Carbon emission factors of each pavement structure (units: kg/t).
Table 2. Carbon emission factors of each pavement structure (units: kg/t).
PhaseStructureAsphalt PavementCement Pavement
Raw materials productionCourseAsphalt binder439.8Cement-
Aggregate5.84Aggregate5.36
Mineral powder133.4Steel15,299.39
BaseCement-Cement-
Aggregate5.7Aggregate5.36
SubbaseCement-Cement-
Aggregate5.61Aggregate5.36
Construction processCourseAsphalt binder mixing, transportation, paving, and compacting25.38Laying down,
compacting, curing
320.51
kg/(lane·km)
BaseCement mixing, transportation, laying down, compacting, and curing2.76Cement mixing, transportation74.45 (kg/m3)
Table 3. Carbon emission factors of each road structure during construction phase (Blue background for asphalt pavement and grey background for cement pavement; units: kg/t).
Table 3. Carbon emission factors of each road structure during construction phase (Blue background for asphalt pavement and grey background for cement pavement; units: kg/t).
Provinces or RegionsRoad TypeExpresswayClass-Ⅰ
(4-Lane)
Class-Ⅱ
(2-Lane)
Class-Ⅲ
(2-Lane)
Class-Ⅳ
(2-Lane)
4-Lane6-Lane8-Lane
Beijing, Tianjin, HebeiAsphalt Pavement1646 2409 3173 1575 529 463 334
Cement Pavement22,516 47,753 82,364 20,845 5516 4489 2724
Jiangxi, AnhuiAsphalt Pavement1651 2416 3182 1580 531 464 335
Cement Pavement22,535 47,781 82,402 20,863 5524 4496 2729
Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Henan, HubeiAsphalt Pavement1670 2445 3220 1599 536 469 339
Cement Pavement22,605 47,884 82,538 20,929 5554 4522 2747
Fujian, Shanxi, Tibet, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, XinjiangAsphalt Pavement1713 2507 3302 1642 546 478 348
Cement Pavement22,759 48,112 82,839 21,075 5620 4580 2785
GuizhouAsphalt Pavement1733 2536 3340 1661 551 483 352
Cement Pavement22,832 48,219 82,981 21,144 5651 4608 2804
ShannxiAsphalt Pavement1737 2543 3349 1666 552 484 352
Cement Pavement22,848 48,242 83,011 21,159 5658 4614 2807
Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Guangdong, Hainan, Chongqing, Sichuan, Inner MongoliaAsphalt Pavement1760 2577 3394 1689 558 490 357
Cement Pavement22,934 48,369 83,179 21,241 5695 4646 2829
YunnanAsphalt Pavement1794 2627 3459 1723 567 497 364
Cement Pavement23,056 48,550 83,418 21,357 5747 4692 2860
GuangxiAsphalt Pavement1679 2458 3237 1608 538 471 341
Cement Pavement22,637 47,931 82,600 20,959 5568 4534 2755
Table 4. Detailed figures of GHG emissions from the construction of each road type during 2009–2019 (unit: million t CO2e).
Table 4. Detailed figures of GHG emissions from the construction of each road type during 2009–2019 (unit: million t CO2e).
ExpresswayClass-ⅠClass-ⅡClass-ⅢClass-ⅣTotal
20097.818.2911.2740.09371.79439.25
201014.908.196.0548.37326.77404.28
201117.926.059.1338.55174.97246.62
201218.609.668.4746.25178.05261.03
201313.658.196.5327.91176.66232.94
201412.349.585.8138.83175.35241.90
201519.099.238.8235.85168.78241.78
201612.2712.998.8541.30220.59296.00
201710.509.507.1332.65134.08193.87
201810.1211.249.6454.33145.84231.17
201911.518.548.6953.96297.28379.97
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, C.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Ye, K.; Liang, G. Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Construction by Considering the Regional Differences in Carbon Emission Factors of Cement: The Case of China. Buildings 2022, 12, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091341

AMA Style

Yu C, Wu L, Liu Y, Ye K, Liang G. Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Construction by Considering the Regional Differences in Carbon Emission Factors of Cement: The Case of China. Buildings. 2022; 12(9):1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Chao, Liu Wu, Yuyao Liu, Kunhui Ye, and Guibao Liang. 2022. "Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Construction by Considering the Regional Differences in Carbon Emission Factors of Cement: The Case of China" Buildings 12, no. 9: 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop