Multidimensional Spatial Driving Factors of Urban Vitality Evolution at the Subdistrict Scale of Changsha City, China, Based on the Time Series of Human Activities

Abstract

Urban vitality is an important reflection of a city’s development potential and urban quality. This study used exploratory spatio-temporal big data such as social media check-ins to portray the spatio-temporal evolution of urban vitality at the subdistrict scale in Changsha, a city in central China, from 2013 to 2021, finding that urban vitality in Changsha exhibited central agglomeration and outward circling expansion over time, and then we used Geodetector and spatial regression analyses to explain the interactive effects and spatio-temporal heterogeneity of the spatial elements of subdistrict form, subdistrict function, and subdistrict economy on urban vitality. The results show the following: (1) The subdistrict form and subdistrict function dimensions had a significant effect on urban vitality, and the effect of the economic dimension of the subdistrict was not significant. (2) The interaction effect of the density of entertainment and leisure facilities and the density of business office facilities in subdistrict function was the dominant factor in the change of urban vitality. (3) Under the spatio-temporal effect, land use diversity and park facility density had the strongest positive effect on urban vitality; road density and shopping facility density had the weakest effect. The study aimed to provide a reference for the optimization and allocation of spatial elements of subdistricts in sustainable urban development and urban renewal, in order to achieve the purpose of urban vitality creation and enhancement.

1. Introduction

With the rapid economic development and urbanization since China’s Reform and Opening-up, urban space has shifted from rough expansion to intensive connotative development. Urban renewal is an important means of achieving sustainable urban development [1]. The shaping and enhancement of spatial quality is the main goal of the urban renewal movement [2], and urban spatial quality is closely related to vitality [3]. Vibrant cities have higher well-being indices for their residents and tend to be more attractive to investment and talent inflows, enhancing urban competitiveness [4]. Maintaining and enhancing the urban vitality of urban centers is particularly important for the realization of urban development [5]. Urban vitality is a spatial characteristic that results from the interactions between human activities and space; it is also an important manifestation of the potential for urban development and urban quality [6,7]. Subdistrict-scale urban vitality provides a finer-grained reflection of the activity of people interacting with the urban space [8].

Urban vitality is a classic topic in urban planning and development, and the creation of vibrant cities and vibrant spaces has long been a concern in the fields of urban planning, environmental science, and geography [9,10]. The characterization and measurement of urban vitality is the focus of scholars’ attention, and the characterization of urban vitality is generally based on the related theories of Jacobs and Jan Gehl, according to whom urban vitality is qualitatively embodied in the composite qualities of the explicit and objective existence of the city and is quantitatively characterized by the people and their activities in the city [7,11,12]. In terms of measurement indicators, novel big data is often used as a measure of urban vitality. Kim et al. [12] used cell phone traffic signals and Wi-Fi access points to measure urban vitality intensity, based on the perspective of combining virtual and real. Levin et al. [13] used remote sensing data to find that nighttime light images can effectively reflect the intensity of urban residents’ activities and that it changes over time. Wu et al. [14] explored the difference between daytime and nighttime vitality by using Easygo crowd-sourced travel data. Concerning the object of study, administrative divisions are often used as a basic measure of urban vitality [15,16]. There are also more extensive measures of vitality for specific spatial types, such as urban vitality measures for historic districts [17], parks [18], and waterfronts [19]. Urban vitality exhibits a high degree of concentration where there is a high and overlapping density of population as well as commercial and public service facilities [5]. Vitality measurement methods include interview questionnaires [20], the entropy method vitality evaluation model [21], the Jane Index [5], the Projection Pursuit Model (PPM) [22], kernel density estimation [23], and other methods. In addition, Li et al. [7] and Qi et al. [24] have over the course of time been applied in related research.

Established studies have shown that the factors affecting the urban vitality of cities mainly include social development, economic restructuring, and characteristics of the built environment and other aspects. In the area of social development, social policies and institutions are important factors influencing the urban vitality of cities. With the loss of vitality in inner cities, due to the aging of the urban physical environment and to functional imbalance, countries around the world have been promoting urban renewal campaigns since the middle of the last century to restore the vitality of cities [25]. Effective intervention by governmental agencies leads to an orderly urban renewal movement, which is a mandatory and effective strategy for revitalizing urban center spaces [26]. Negative events, such as major social emergencies, such as the outbreak of COVID-19 [27,28] and wars and conflicts [29], can reduce the vitality of urban spaces and have lasting impacts. Economic restructuring often brings about corresponding changes in the spatial dynamics of cities. Traditional economic development indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP) and disposable income per capita are partly indicative of economic vitality, and elevated levels of these indicators mean that social activities such as consumption and innovative behaviors of the population can be promoted to influence the urban vitality [30]. Emerging online economies such as urban takeaways in recent years also contribute to the clustering of urban vitality as a consumer activity for the population [31]. In terms of the built environment, scholars have chosen to measure different types of urban built environment indicators to analyze their impact on urban vitality, such as reasonable urban texture [8] and spatial structure [32], that can lead to the gathering of vitality; to intense urban development and construction [33]; and to supporting facilities [34] that are also considered to be closely related to urban vitality, including high-density buildings that create intensely fertile ground for crowd activities [16]. In terms of analytical methods, geographically weighted regression (GWR) [34], structural equation modeling (SEM) [32], and spatial lag modeling (SLM) [7] are often used in related studies. For example, Wang et al. [35] used multi-scale GWR to explore the spatial and temporal influence mechanism of 24 h urban vitality in Beijing. In addition, Geodetector is increasingly being used in related research. For example, Li et al. [36] used Geodetector to analyze the interaction effects among the drivers of nighttime light expansion dynamics. Overall, it seems that studies at the level of the city have been more frequent, while fewer studies have looked at indicator systems of factors influencing urban vitality at the neighborhood level and could therefore be further supplemented.

Changsha is the representative city of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in China [37]. Strategically, it is an important nodal city of the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and has rapidly developed into a megacity with a resident population of more than 10 million under the guidance of the “The Belt and Road” and “The Yangtze River Economic Belt” national strategies [38]. As a popular city for travel on the Internet, it has been vigorously developing its nighttime economy in recent years, with the city’s attractiveness and economic competitiveness rising year by year and it playing an exemplary role in economic transformation. Therefore, Changsha City is representative of its geographical location and economic development characteristics and is a typical city in China’s fast-growing central region [39]. As a representative of China’s new first-tier cities, Changsha is facing urban problems, such as deteriorating road traffic and loss of vitality in the old urban areas after experiencing rapid industrial and economic development [40]. This makes Changsha a typical city for measuring the factors influencing the spatial and temporal evolution of urban vitality.

Summarizing existing research, it was found that a large number of studies have been conducted on urban vitality and its driving factors based on different study areas, scales, and perspectives. However, current research on urban vitality and its driving factors is mainly based on cross-sectional data, and in terms of study areas, nationwide studies are mainly explored at the provincial scale, while studies at the prefecture, city, county, and district scales are mostly confined to developed regions. The research methodology is dominated by the research paradigm of environmental geography, but there is a lack of exploration of the interactive effects of neighborhood form-function and urban vitality relationships. At the same time, urban vitality agglomeration does not evolve in the short term but is formed over a long period by way of various spatial factors [41], with a strong temporal sequence [42]. Most current studies lack consideration of the spatial and temporal characteristics of the evolution of urban vitality and the factors influencing it over a multi-year span. Based on this, this paper used exploratory spatial data analysis to investigate the evolution of urban vitality and spatial and temporal influences at the subdistrict scale in Changsha, a city in central China. We used Geodetector and spatial regression analyses to explain the interactive effects and spatio-temporal heterogeneity of the three dimensions of subdistrict form, subdistrict function, and subdistrict economy on urban vitality. Our aim was to provide targeted planning recommendations as a reference for the creation and enhancement of vibrancy in the construction of sustainable human settlement and urban renewal.

2. Study Area and Indicator Selection

2.1. Study Area

Changsha is located in Hunan Province, China, in the central region of China, with a latitude and longitude of 28°11′49″ N,112°58′42″ E. The central urban area of Changsha City in this study refers to the urban area within the third ring road, involving Wangcheng District, Kaifu District, Changsha County, Yuelu District, Furong District, Tianxin District, and Yuhua District (Figure 1). Subdistricts are the basic organizational units of the city’s morphological structure and urban functions, and the central city is divided into 81 subdistricts based on administrative divisions, which are used as research units.

2.2. Selection of Indicators

2.2.1. Indicators of Urban Vitality

Considering the availability of data, this study selected the period of 2013–2021, with a research period of nine years, and the study years selected were 2013, 2017, and 2021 for the empirical analysis of the urban vitality of subdistricts. Urban public space vitality is usually characterized by crowd activity situations, and this study used social media check-in data with spatio-temporal big data on nighttime lighting to characterize urban subdistrict urban vitality [8,35]. Social media check-in data can effectively respond to the location information of urban individuals at any given time [43]. Compared to traditional research data, the shared check-in social media information can be captured by online web crawlers to obtain the behavioral dynamics of urban residents based on the intensity of check-ins, which reflects the temporal characteristics of urban residents’ movement and aggregation [44,45]. Sina Weibo is the largest social network platform in China, and Weibo check-in big data can effectively respond to the spatio-temporal behavior of urban residents [46]. In this study, we used a Python program to capture the microblog data with check-in location information from the Sina Weibo website https://weibo.com (accessed on 10 March 2023) by collecting the check-in location information from the time nodes of December 2013, October 2017, and August 2021 and obtaining a total of 37,198 pieces of valid data after cleaning. The urban vitality was quantified jointly with the nighttime lighting data, as there may have been a low amount of early data due to differences in the number of users in different years and the difficulty of crawling the early data. Nighttime light images can directly reflect the spatial information of human social activities, and the continuous NPP/VIIRS nighttime light data were processed to obtain the annual nighttime light index [47] for three years, which was obtained from Earth Observation Group https://eogdata.mines.edu/ (accessed on 13 March 2023). The results were shown in

Table 1. Indicators of urban vitality.

Theme	Variable	Explanation	2013 Mean/STD	2017 Mean/STD	2021 Mean/STD
Urban vitality	CW	Point density of Weibo check-ins	1.169/2.088	2.062/3.630	1.676/2.289
	NLI	Night Light Index	16.213/18.312	20.474/43.664	56.18/111.71

.

2.2.2. Influencing Elements of Urban Vitality

In this study, 14 indicators were selected from the three levels of subdistrict form, subdistrict function, and subdistrict economy to analyze the influence of urban vitality in subdistricts, as shown in

Table 2. Indicator system for subdistrict spatial driving factors for urban vitality.

Theme	Variable	Explanation	2013 Mean/STD	2017 Mean/STD	2021 Mean/STD
Subdistrict form	SHDI	Shannon’s Diversity Index	0.373/0.400	0.500/0.402	1.012/0.449
	RD	Road density	2.880/2.209	5.003/2.702	6.849/3.943
	UNVI	Urban Normalized Vegetation Index	4455.808/1462.664	5391.162/1344.464	5574.558/1327.430
	MSD	Metro station density	-/-	0.881/2.566	1.240/2.547
	NH	Neighborhood hydrophilic	0.701/0.482	0.736/0.508	0.806/0.522
Subdistrict function	DP	The density of park facilities	0.820/1.746	2.711/4.629	6.849/3.943
	DRD	Dining room density	25.256/42.980	142.550/187.261	1.012/0.449
	DS	The density of shopping facilities	56.383/100.326	250.027/281.288	3.406/5.036
	DBO	The density of business office facilities	30.205/89.556	104.054/196.502	197.486/273.150
	DRL	The density of recreational and leisure facilities	8.047/14.820	20.553/33.906	125.612/168.580
	DH	The density of health facilities	3.179/3.769	5.546/4.953	7.206/5.320
Subdistrict economy	GDP	Gross domestic product	810.971/251.924	1153.451/295.777	1520.181/445.961
	DPI	Disposable personal income	3.263/0.462	4.666/0.498	6.400/0.562
	DOP	The density of the resident population	4.592/3.964	4.325/3.326	4.546/2.787

. In terms of subdistrict form, the land use diversity index was calculated based on point of interest (POI) data for Shannon entropy (SHDI), which can effectively reflect the degree of mixed land use in the subdistrict [48]. Road density (RD) is closely related to subdistrict morphology and is usually expressed in terms of the total length of roads per unit of subdistrict area [49]. The road network data in this paper came from the OpenStreetMap (OSM) platform, which is a widely used platform for acquiring geographic data [50]. Vegetation cover is a major reflector of human activities, and the Urban Normalized Vegetation Index (UNVI) is closely related to land use and expansion [51,52]. The density of transport facilities is an important part of the morphology of subdistricts and land use planning, and the underground is one of the main modes of transport in modern cities [53]; in this paper, the density of the metro stations (MSD) was expressed through the number of metro stations per unit area of the subdistrict. Waterfront space is one of the important carriers of the urban landscape, and the urban vitality of waterfront areas is an important research theme of urban vitality [19,54]. In this study, the inverse of the straight-line distance from the center of mass of the subdistrict to the nearest body of water was used as a measure of the hydrophilicity (NH) of the subdistrict. In terms of subdistrict function, six categories of POI functional facility indicators were selected as factors influencing the urban vitality of the subdistrict using web crawler technology. Urban parks can increase residents’ social connections and promote social interactions between neighbors [55], so the role of influencing vitality was explored through the density of POI park facilities (DP) within a subdistrict. Restaurants are one of the basic urban amenities that are closely related to the dynamic activities of the city [56], and in this study, the ratio of the number of POI restaurant facilities in a subdistrict to the size of the neighborhood was chosen to represent the density of restaurant facilities (DRD). Urban studies usually correlate resident behavior with shopping place linkages [57,58], and shopping centers usually promote social activities among residents [59], so the density of POI shopping facility (DS) points in a subdistrict was chosen as one of the driving factors. Differences in the planning of business offices have different impacts on the spatial behavior of employees, and the development of business districts is also linked to the urban spatial planning model [60], where the density of business offices (DBO) in the subdistrict is taken into account. Recreation and leisure facilities in residential environments have a positive effect on the mobility of urban residents [61,62], so this study chose to measure the ratio of the number of recreation and leisure facilities in the POI of a subdistrict to the area of the subdistrict as a proxy for recreation and leisure facility density (DRL) to investigate the influence on urban vitality. Healthcare facilities are one of the indispensable elements for urban development, as they relate to the health and wellbeing of residents [63], so we chose to incorporate the indicator of the density of POI healthcare facilities (DH) in the subdistrict. In terms of subdistrict economy, GDP and disposable personal income (DPI) are the classic indicators of economic vitality in cities, while the resident population number is the dominant element of economic development in cities [64,65]; therefore, subdistrict GDP, DPI, and the total number of the resident population in the subdistrict were chosen to measure the influential nature of urban vitality.

The urban infrastructure elements of the subdistrict morphology laid out above and functional level data came from web crawlers and the official website of OSM, while the natural elements came from satellite remote sensing data, and the socio-economic development elements of the subdistrict economic data came from the Changsha City Statistical Yearbook.

3. Methodology

3.1. Entropy Weight Method

The entropy weight method was widely used in the research of urban vitality evaluation [21,66,67]. In this study, we drew on previous research methods and used the entropy weight method to measure the urban vitality in the central city of Changsha.

First, the data were normalized by Formula (1), after which the entropy weight method was used to determine the weights of the urban vitality indicators, and the formula is shown in (2):

$$R_{ij}=\frac{x_{ij}-\mathit{min}\left(x_{ij}\right)}{\mathit{max}\left(x_{ij}\right)-\mathit{min}\left(x_{ij}\right)}$$

(1)

$$P_{ij}=\frac{R_{ij}}{{\sum }_{i=1}^m{R}_{ij}}$$

(2)

Next, the entropy value $e_j$ and the information utility value $f_j$ were calculated for each indicator, taking the following forms:

$$e_j=-\frac{1}{{ln}_m}\times \left[\sum _{i=1}^m{P}_{ij}\times \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\left({\mathrm{P}}_{ij}\right)\right]$$

(3)

$$f_j=1-e_j$$

(4)

Then, the weights of each indicator $W_j$ were calculated:

$$W_j=\frac{f_j}{{\sum }_{j=1}^n{f}_j}=\frac{1-e_j}{{\sum }_{j=1}^{n}1-e_i}$$

(5)

Finally, a composite value for the urban vitality was calculated:

$$z_{ij}=\sum _{i=1}^n{R}_{ij}{W}_j$$

(6)

where $R_{ij}$ is the normalized value of the indicator in year $j$ of the vitality assessment unit $i$; $P_{ij}$ is the normalized value of $R_{ij}$; $e_j$ is the entropy value of the indicator $i$; $W_j$ is the weight of the indicator $i$, which is the entropy weight; and $z_{ij}$ is the composite value of urban vitality for unit $i$.

3.2. Spatial Autocorrelation

3.2.1. Global Spatial Autocorrelation

Global spatial autocorrelation is used to measure the overall degree of spatial relatedness, and in this paper, we first measured the spatial relatedness of urban vitality using global Moran’s I, which was calculated as follows:

$$I=\frac{n{\sum }_{i=1}^n{\sum }_{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}(y_i-\overline{y})(y_j-\overline{y})}{{\sum }_{i=1}^n{\sum }_{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}{\sum }_{i=1}^n(y_i-\overline{y})}$$

(7)

where $y_j$ is the urban vitality $i$ and $j$, $\overline{y}$ is the mean value of urban vitality, $W_{ij}$ is the spatial weight, and n is the total number of subdistricts. $I$ have a value range of [−1,1]. $I$ > 0 and is significant, indicating the existence of the spatial autocorrelation of subdistrict urban vitality, which means that there is spatial autocorrelation between areas with high and low urban vitality intensity, and that high urban vitality subdistricts and low urban vitality subdistricts tend to cluster in geographic space, respectively; I < 0 and is significant, indicating that there is a negative spatial correlation between urban vitality, which means that subdistricts with high and low urban vitality values tend to be geographically spatially discrete. When I = 0, this indicates that the spatial distribution of subdistrict urban vitality is random.

3.2.2. Local Spatial Autocorrelation

The local spatial autocorrelation can reflect the degree of association between a local spatial unit and its neighbors, and it is calculated as follows:

$$I_i=\frac{1}{S^2}\left(y_i-\overline{y}\right)\sum _{i=1}^n{W}_{ij}\left(y_i-\overline{y}\right)$$

(8)

$$S_{}^2=\frac{1}{n-1}\sum _{i=1}^n(y_i-\overline{y})$$

(9)

where $I_i$ > 0 and is significant, indicating that blocks $I_i$ with high (low) urban vitality values are adjacent to blocks with high (low) urban vitality values; $I_i$ < 0 and is significant, indicating that blocks with high (low) urban vitality values are adjacent to blocks with low (high) urban vitality values; and when $I_i$ = 0, this indicates that the distribution of urban vitality of the subdistrict is random.

3.3. Geodetector Model

Geodetector is a spatial analysis model that detects the relationship between spatial differentiation and its potential influences, identifying associations between variables as a result of changes in spatial distribution [68]. In this study, the Geodetector model was used to explore the subdistrict dominant factors affecting the distribution of urban vitality in the central city of Changsha, and the calculation formula is as follows:

$$q=1-\frac{1}{N{\sigma }^2}\sum _{n=1}^L{N}_n{\sigma }_n^2$$

(10)

where L is the classification of the dependent variable; N is the total number of subdistricts; and σ_n is the variance within stratum h. The q-value indicates the explanatory power of the detection factor for the explanatory variables.

3.4. Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression

Geodetector can analyze the impact of driving factors on the overall aggregation of urban vitality but is unable to explore differences in driving factors across regions [69]. To further explore the regional differences in the impact of driving factors on urban vitality, a spatial econometric regression model was chosen to explore the impact of urban vitality. The traditional GWR model cannot take into account the non-stationarity of the study object in the time dimension, and the geographically and temporally weighted regression model (GTWR) takes into account both temporal and spatial non-stationarities, which enables more efficient parameter estimation [41], calculated as follows:

$$y_i={\beta }_0\left(u_i,v_i,t_i\right)+\sum _{k=1}^p{\beta }_k\left(u_i,v_i,t_i\right)x_{ik}+{\epsilon }_i$$

(11)

where $y_i$ is the explanatory variable, $\left(u_i,v_i,t_i\right)$ is the spatio-temporal coordinates of neighborhood i, and ${\epsilon }_i$ is the random error.

4. Characteristics of Urban Vitality Evolution in Changsha

4.1. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Changes in Urban Vitality

To visually reflect the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the urban vitality in the subdistricts, the natural breakpoint method was used to classify the urban vitality values into five levels from high to low: low urban vitality subdistricts (0.000–0.034), lower urban vitality subdistricts (0.034–0.091), medium urban vitality subdistricts (0.091–0.179), higher urban vitality subdistricts (0.179–0.287), and high urban vitality subdistricts (0.287–0.582). The distribution map of urban vitality of Changsha central city subdistricts from 2013 to 2021 was drawn to summarize the trend of the differences in urban vitality of Changsha subdistricts, as shown in Figure 2.

From 2013 to 2021, low urban vitality subdistricts and lower urban vitality subdistricts were concentrated in Wangcheng District and north of Kaifu District in the north, Yuhua District in the south-central part of the city, and Changsha County in the east, while high-vitality subdistricts and higher-vitality subdistricts were concentrated in Furong, Yuhua, and Yuelu districts in the central part of the city and expanded to the west and south. The main spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the urban vitality of subdistricts are as follows: in 2013, the urban vitality of subdistricts in Changsha’s central urban area as a whole showed a spatial distribution pattern of high in the middle and low in the surroundings, with high urban vitality subdistricts and higher urban vitality subdistricts distributed in the central and south-central areas, dispersing sporadically to the peripheral areas. In 2017, areas of high urban vitality and higher urban vitality gradually expanded southwards, contiguously in the south-central region and sporadically into the eastern and western regions. By 2021, the pattern of distribution of the urban vitality of subdistricts changed considerably, showing a pattern of centralized distribution, with high urban vitality and higher urban vitality subdistricts concentrated in the central, western, and southern regions, and tending to be sporadically distributed in the east-central region. Low spatial vigor values and lower spatial vigor value subdistrict variations were not well characterized.

4.2. Spatial Clustering Characteristics and Changes in Urban Vitality

The global Moran’I indexes of urban vitality of subdistricts were 0.381, 0.435, and 0.468 from 2013 to 2021, and the Moran’I index increased sequentially, which indicates that there was a significant positive spatial dependence of the distribution of urban vitality of subdistricts and that it was increasing year by year. The LISA map (Figure 3) reflects the local spatial distribution characteristics of the urban vitality of subdistricts in central Changsha. The number of low–high-type subdistricts increased and was characterized by a sporadic distribution between 2013 and 2021. The high–low-type subdistrict showed independent distribution characteristics and shifts from the north to the east; the low–low-type subdistrict showed clustered distribution characteristics and was permanently distributed in the northern area and to the south. The number of subdistrict types with high–high urban vitality in the subdistrict increased between 2013 and 2021 and was concentrated in the central region. Overall, from 2013 to 2021, the urban vitality of subdistricts of the high–high type was concentrated in the central Furong District and the intersection of Tianxin and Yuhua Districts, and it gradually extended in all directions, while the low–low-type of the subdistrict was concentrated in the Wangcheng District, the Kaifu District, and the northern part of Changsha County in the long term and spread down to the southern part of Changsha County.

5. An Analysis of the Driving Factors of Urban Vitality within the Subdistrict Space

5.1. Geodetection Results of Driving Factors

The driving factors affecting the intensity of urban vitality in Changsha’s subdistricts were probed, and the results are shown in

Table 3. Influence factor detection results.

Code	Geodetector Factor	q-Value	p-Value	Significance	Sort
X1	SHDI	0.563	0.000	0.01%	3
X2	RD	0.497	0.000	0.01%	5
X3	UNVI	0.209	0.031	0.05%	-
X4	DP	0.403	0.002	0.01%	7
X5	DRD	0.517	0.000	0.01%	4
X6	DS	0.419	0.000	0.01%	6
X7	DBO	0.642	0.000	0.01%	2
X8	DRL	0.643	0.000	0.01%	1
X9	DH	0.357	0.051	0.05%	-
X10	GDP	0.181	0.042	-	-
X11	DPI	0.181	0.042	0.05%	-
X12	DOP	0.252	0.008	0.01%	-
X13	MSD	0.285	0.255	-	-
X14	NH	0.058	0.774	-	-

. Since Geodetector can only analyze cross-sectional data, drawing on Tan et al. [70] and Zhang et al. [71], the mean values of the explanatory variables and each influencing factor were taken for the three years and reclassified using Jenks’s natural breakpoints method, which converted the numerical quantities of the factors to typological quantities and then later analyzed the q-values using the Geodetector model.

Geodetector results showed that 3 of the 14 factors in subdistrict form, subdistrict function, and subdistrict economy had q-values higher than 0.05 as non-significant. Among all the detected factors, seven factors in terms of subdistrict form and subdistrict function had a significant influence on the urban vitality of Changsha’s subdistricts, and their explanatory power was as follows, in descending order: DRL (X8) > DBO (X7) > SHDI (X1) > DRD (X5) > RD (X2) > DS (X6) > DP (X4). In particular, the q-statistics of DRL (0.643), DBO (0.642), SHDI (0.563), and DRD (0.517) exceeded 0.5 and passed the significance test at the 0.01 level, and their explanatory power for the spatial distribution of subdistrict vibrancy in Changsha’s central urban area exceeded 50%, which was the dominant factor influencing the distribution of vibrancy intensity. RD (0.497), DS (0.419), and DP (0.403) were the next most dominant factors with high explanatory power and were significant at the 0.01 level. DH, MSD, DOP, UNVI, and DPI had relatively low explanatory power, although they were significant at the 0.01 and 0.05 levels. GDP, MSD, and NH did not pass the test of significance at the 5% level and did not have sufficient explanatory power for the distribution of urban vitality in the subdistrict.

The results of the interaction probes for the significant factors are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that all the driving factors did not only have independent effects on the differences in urban vitality of subdistricts, and the results of the interaction probes between the driving factors showed that the interaction effects were two-way enhancement or non-linear enhancement. This indicates that the explanatory power of the distribution of urban vitality after the interaction between the driving factors in various aspects was enhanced to different degrees compared with when the factors acted individually, which suggests that the distribution of the intensity of urban vitality was the result of the joint action of multiple factors. This indicates that the distribution of urban vitality intensity was the result of the joint action of multiple factors. In particular, the interaction of the functional aspects of the subdistrict, DRL, and DBO with other factors had a strong explanatory power of 0.5 or more; the synergistic effect of DP and DBO had the strongest effect on the urban vitality of the subdistrict, with an explanatory power of 0.86; and the interaction of the subdistrict’s GDP and DPI had the lowest effect, with an explanatory power of 0.19.

5.2. Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity in Spatial Driving Factors of Subdistricts

5.2.1. Model Diagnostics and Validity Estimation Impact Analysis

The spatial measurement model needed to be screened before regression analysis was performed. Firstly, the multiple covariance test of explanatory variables was conducted for each aspect of driving factors, and then the model diagnostic coefficients of OLS, GWR, TWR, and GTWR were compared, and the spatial econometric model with the optimal parameters was selected. Finally, the selected model regression results were combined with the Geodetector results for validity estimation [72,73,74].

A multiple covariance test of variance inflation factor (VIF) was carried out on the urban vitality of Changsha central urban subdistricts and seven dominant factors, and the results showed that the VIF value of the density of food and beverage facilities was 14.28, which was higher than the critical value of 10, indicating the existence of multiple covariance, and the re-conducting of the VIF test after deletion of the density of food and beverage facilities showed that there was no multi-covariance for the other factors. The results are shown in

Table 4. Covariance test results.

Covariance Test		Modified Covariance Test
Variant	VIF Value	Variant	VIF Value
DRL	8.793	DRL	4.579
DBO	2.110	DBO	1.797
SHDI	1.903	SHDI	1.802
DRD	14.283	RD	1.452
RD	1.469	DS	3.418
DS	4.443	DP	2.843
DP	2.861

.

The urban vitality was then analyzed in a spatial econometric regression with the six driving factors. In this study, ArcGIS 10.7 was used as the operating platform, and the optimal bandwidth was measured by loading the GTWR plug-in; selecting AICc; and regressing the OLS, TWR, GWR, and GTWR models, as well as comparing the results. The model diagnostic results are shown in

Table 5. Model diagnostic coefficients.

	OLS	TWR	GWR	GTWR
R2	0.588	0.614	0.668	0.681
R2 adjusted	0.577	0.604	0.631	0.672
AICc	490.830	−668.756	477.808	1579.8

, and the results show that the GTWR model had the highest adjusted R² and the strongest goodness of fit, so the GTWR model was chosen to empirically analyze the driving factors of the spatial and temporal distribution of urban vitality in Changsha’s central district.

5.2.2. Spatial and Temporal Differences in the Impact of Subdistrict Morphology Aspects

Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the spatial and temporal differences in the effect of subdistrict form on changes in the intensity of urban vitality. From 2013 to 2021, the overall mean value of the regression coefficient of the land use diversity index first increased and then decreased to 4.824, 4.585, and 3.718 in 2013, 2017, and 2021, respectively, reflecting the fluctuating decline of the positive effect of SHDI on the intensity of urban vitality, and the regression coefficient decreased gradually from the center to the perimeter. The reasons for this may lie in the fact that Changsha was in a rapid development stage from 2013 to 2017, and the city was in a period of rapid expansion, with the population size and land use rate on the rise [75]. In contrast, in the context of the Changsha COVID-19 outbreak in 2021, the increase in subdistrict traffic flow and crowd concentration triggered by a diversification of land use types led to an increase in the COVID-19 transmission risk [28,76], so the influence of SHDI on urban vitality showed a decreasing trend in 2021. The high-value areas of the regression coefficients of SHDI were mainly in Furong and Yuhua districts, while the low-value areas were mainly distributed in the southern part of Changsha County and Wangcheng District, indicating that the driving effect of SHDI on urban vitality agglomeration was stronger in Furong and Yuhua districts, whereas the influence of SHDI on urban vitality intensity was weaker in Changsha County and Wangcheng District. The reason may lie in the fact that Furong District and Yuhua District are in the center of the city, with high land use, strong crowd concentration, and complete urban facilities, while the southern part of Changsha County and Wangcheng District are relatively underdeveloped urban areas, with a low degree of land use, a single nature of land use, and a dispersed urban vitality due to the limitations of the geographic location.

The average values of the regression coefficients of RD were 0.388, 0.267, and 0.482 from 2013 to 2021, reflecting that the intensity of RD on the urban vitality showed a facilitating effect and a fluctuating upward trend. The reason may lie in the fact that in the early stages of urban development, urban sprawl led to the intricate construction of subdistrict road networks, and part of the road network pattern is not conducive to pedestrian mobility and automobile traffic efficiency in the space [77,78]. In the later stage, after the development of urbanization and the renovation of the old city, the road infrastructure improved, and RD greatly contributed to the vitality of subdistrict space [79]. The regression coefficients of RD on urban vitality were negative in Yuelu District and northern Changsha County and positive elsewhere, and the strongest facilitating effect was found in Tianxin District, Furong District, and Yuhua District. The reason may be that the low coefficient areas of Yuelu District and Changsha County had a single land nature, dominated by forests and arable land, with low road densities and poor crowd agglomeration, while central areas, such as Furong District, are located in the center of Changsha and are characterized by high population densities, high RD densities, and high mobility of crowds.

5.2.3. Spatial and Temporal Differences in the Impact of Functional Aspects of the Subdistrict

The regression coefficients for the functional aspects of the subdistrict are shown in Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10. The average values of the regression coefficients for DP from 2013 to 2021 were 0.665, 0.751, and 0.750, reflecting a gradual increase in the impact of DPs on the urban vitality. Parks are social places for urban residents’ recreation and leisure, providing health and social benefits directly or indirectly [80], and they are ideal open spaces to promote sustainable development [81,82]. Thus, China is vigorously promoting the goal of constructing park cities, which will have a facilitating effect on the aggregation of urban vitality in a subdistrict. Overall, park services are shown to contribute to the urban vitality in all neighborhoods except for the predominantly cropland area in northern Long Beach County. The reason is that parks are a key resource for building the city’s public health and safety [83], which is an essential functional land use for planning purposes, while the city center has a low rate of public open space provision due to the compact urban fabric [84]. The presence of more forested and landscaped parks in Yuelu District attracts more tourists and therefore promotes the urban vitality of subdistricts in a much more effective manner.

The average values of the regression coefficients for DS in the subdistrict were −0.002, −0.001, and 0.000 for the years 2013–2021, with the disincentives gradually decreasing to being negligible. The reason may be that although shopping centers have the function of promoting social interaction among residents, the rapid growth of information technology has made online shopping behaviors frequent [85,86], and online shopping is gradually replacing offline shopping [87]. Except for Yuelu District, where DS in some subdistricts positively contributes to the urban vitality, the rest of the urban area turned out to be inhibitory. The reasons for this may be that the subdistricts with higher regression coefficients are within Changsha’s university city and its surroundings; college students belong to a high consumption group [88], and student consumption behavior plays an important role in the development of the regional economy [89].

The mean values of the regression coefficients of DRL densities from 2013 to 2021 were 0.084, 0.058, and 0.064, reflecting that the aggregation of recreational and leisure venues on the urban vitality decreased and then increased. Early on, there was a problem of traditional recreation and leisure service facilities not being equitably and reasonably allocated [45]. Community residents’ demand for recreation and leisure rose after the epidemic, but there was still a problem of insufficient coverage of outdoor open space recreation facilities [90], and the decline in crowd congregation during the epidemic in Changsha around the year 2021 led to a reduction in indoor recreation activities [91]. Overall, the regression coefficients of the influence of recreation and leisure facilities on the urban vitality increased gradually from east to west, with Changsha County’s recreation and leisure facilities showing a high degree of facilitation of urban vitality, as well as Yuelu District’s overall performance of an inhibitory effect. The reason for this may be that Yuelu District’s land use is relatively homogeneous, with forest parks and educational facilities occupying a large area, and in the early days, it was geographically more remote and developed later compared to the central city.

The mean values of the regression coefficients for DBO from 2013 to 2021 were 0.015, 0.018, and 0.018, reflecting the increased contribution of business office facilities to the urban vitality. As a necessary functional place within the city, business office space is one of the main behavioral purposes of daily trips of subdistrict residents [92], and with the development of neighborhoods and land use density, there is a significant correlation between business office facilities and land use density [93], so the influence of DBO density increases. High-value areas of DBO density are located in Furong, Kaifu, Tianxin, and Yuhua districts, which are the core areas of Changsha with high land use diversity; low-value areas are located in the southern part of Changsha County, where the land use type is mainly cropland and there are fewer DBO facilities.

6. Discussion

In the context of urban development of urban renewal and old city renovation, it is particularly important to study the evolution characteristics and driving factors of urban vitality of subdistricts over a series of years for the revival and prediction of urban vitality. The main feature of this study is to use the spatio-temporal big data to characterize the spatial and temporal evolution of the agglomeration level of urban vitality at the subdistrict scale and to explore the significance and spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the factors influencing the agglomeration of urban vitality at the subdistrict level in terms of the temporal and spatial dimensions by using Geodetector and GTWR models. Compared with previous studies of the characteristics of urban vitality distribution and driving factors, this study focused on the spatial and temporal characteristics of urban vitality aggregation at the subdistrict level over a protracted period of time; it also focused on the interactions and spatial and temporal heterogeneity of driving factors at the form, function, and economic levels, which can reveal a more perfect phenomenon law, and this is of great significance in promoting the enhancement of the urban vitality of the old city and in realizing the sustainable development of the city in the context of urban regeneration.

6.1. Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characterization of Urban Vitality in Changsha City Based on Multi-Source Big Data

Urban vitality is a synthetic concept based on endogenous human interactivity, and the intensity of vitality cannot be effectively identified using only a single type of data [94]. Combining urban sensory data such as social media check-ins with remote sensing data such as nighttime light images can describe the intensity of human activities in the urban inner district space in a refined way, allowing for a better perception of the spatial and temporal dynamics of urban vitality distribution and evolution characteristics. Compared with previous studies on short-term intensity changes of urban vitality based on a single data source, this study quantified the spatial vitality of Changsha’s downtown subdistrict during 2013–2021 from the perspective of human activity time series, combined with spatio-temporal big data such as social media check-ins and nighttime lights, thus providing more accurate preliminary analysis results for a deeper excavation of multidimensional spatial drivers and their spatio-temporal impacts behind the urban vitality later on. From Figure 2 and Figure 3, it can be seen that during the period of 2013–2021, the spatial vitality of the subdistricts in the central city of Changsha as a whole showed a development trend from dispersed to centralized, and the value of vitality intensity increased over time, which was also related to the process of urban construction and development. Subdistricts with higher vitality values are mainly clustered in urban centers with high economic development and close links between production and life, while peripheral areas such as Wangcheng District and Changsha County, where the surrounding economy is relatively underdeveloped and the proportion of primary industry production is high, have lower vitality values.

6.2. Analysis of Multidimensional Driving Factors for Vitality within Subdistrict Spaces

Urban development cannot be separated from the joint participation of multidimensional elements in space, and the spatial and temporal changes in urban vitality are closely related to the various dimensions of urban constituents at the spatial scale [55]. After analysis of

Table 6. Descriptive statistics of GTWR regression coefficients.

		2013				2017				2021
		Min	Max	Mean	STD	Min	Max	Mean	STD	Min	Max	Mean	STD
Subdistrict form	SHDI	−2.128	0.620	4.824	2.618	−1.151	8.194	4.585	2.412	−0.598	6.861	3.718	2.021
	RD	−1.179	0.620	−0.424	0.439	−1.291	0.460	−0.428	0.428	−0.984	0.486	3.718	0.337
Subdistrict function	DP	−1.249	1.432	0.665	0.560	−1.010	1.790	0.751	0.528	−0.708	1.694	0.750	0.531
	DS	−0.027	0.007	−0.002	−0.002	−0.018	0.012	−0.001	0.006	−0.014	0.011	0.001	0.004
	DRL	0.084	0.834	0.084	0.084	−0.039	0.649	0.058	0.132	−0.122	0.515	0.063	0.108
	DBO	−0.071	0.050	0.015	0.018	−0.060	0.048	0.018	0.016	−0.063	0.053	0.018	0.020

, we found that in terms of subdistrict morphology, the influence of SHDI and RD on the spatial and temporal evolution of spatial vitality in urban subdistricts and the distribution of agglomeration was high, which confirms that urban planning has a macro-control effect on the creation and enhancement of spatial vitality [9]. SHDI showed a positive contribution to driving urban vitality in Changsha over the period 2013–2021 and exhibited an increasing and then decreasing trend. This suggests that in the early stage of urban development, the mixing of urban land use functional zones will promote the activities of residents and urban vitality, but in the late stage of urban development, excessive land use mixing will lead to the loss of the uniqueness of urban functional zones and thus inhibit the aggregation and distribution of urban vitality. The overall effect of DR on the spatial vitality of urban subdistricts showed a fluctuating upward effect of inhibition followed by promotion, and it still showed an inhibitory effect in the later period in the region with a lower urbanization rate, which indicates that the lack of unified planning and coordination of the construction of subdistrict road network caused by the early urban sprawl has been detrimental to the residents’ mobility and traveling efficiency, which in turn hampers the enhancement of the spatial vitality of the urban subdistricts.

The subdistrict functional dimensions are multiple and potent drivers of changes in urban vitality, but there are also spatial and temporal differences in the impact of different spatial elements on changes in vitality intensity. DP and DBO positively contribute to the spatial vitality of urban subdistricts and are increasing year by year. Park facilities are one of the main activity areas for urban residents, increasing the flow of people within the street space and contributing to the agglomeration and enhancement of urban vitality; areas where commercial office facilities are concentrated tend to have high urban economic vitality and are major destinations for urban residents’ transportation, so the positive contribution of commercial office facilities to urban vitality is positive. In addition, the interaction of DP and DBO on urban vitality reached over 0.8, which is the strongest interaction driver of urban spatial vitality, also corresponding to the fact that the higher urban vitality clusters in Figure 2 are the areas with a high density of business districts and parks and squares. Therefore, for the subdistricts of Wangcheng District and Changsha County with low values of urban vitality, consideration can be given to increasing the density of business office facilities by attracting investment on the premise of ensuring the red line of arable land and appropriately increasing the number of supporting parks and green spaces near the residential areas or business districts in order to realize the enhancement of urban vitality, thereby promoting the development of the regional economy. The overall driving force of DS on urban vitality in Changsha City is decreasing year by year to finally be close to none, but some subdistricts in Yuelu District show a positive contribution to urban vitality, which is also related to its land use type, and the functional nature of the subdistrict with a high driving force is mainly for the land of higher education facilities, which indicates that the consumer behavior activities of college students contribute to the enhancement of urban vitality. Recreational facilities are one of the essential infrastructures in urban space, and the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of recreational facilities on spatial vitality within urban subdistricts in Changsha City during the period of 2013–2021 shows a fluctuating characteristic of decreasing and then increasing, which suggests that recreational facilities have a contributing effect on urban vitality.

6.3. Policy Implications

Investigating the main spatial driving factors behind trends in the evolution of urban vitality based on human activity time series and differences in spatial distribution is of great reference significance for the new era of human-centered urban planning and construction. From the dimension of subdistrict form and subdistrict function, it helps urban planning departments to make clear decisions on the layout of urban functional areas and the location of infrastructure and to make long-term plans for regional development, which can alleviate the problem of loss and uneven distribution of urban vitality to a certain extent. In Changsha, as a representative city of China’s rapid economic development in recent years, the urban vitality value of the central city has also been increasing year by year [39]. However, in the analysis of vitality evolution, the uneven development of urban vitality in new cities and the decrease in urban vitality in some subdistricts of old cities are also found, and it is necessary to adopt differentiated policies to cope with such phenomena. For example, for areas farther away from the city center and with slower development, measures should be taken to improve subdistrict form, determine subdistrict function, appropriately increase land utilization, enrich the traffic network as soon as possible, improve road density and accessibility, and control the development intensity of the peripheral cultivated land area; in addition, for some subdistricts with declining urban vitality, subdistrict form should be repaired, the function of the subdistrict should be increased, the types of land use should be rationally organized to avoid too much functional homogenization, and the diversity of land use should be enhanced through the addition of different types of urban infrastructures, all in order to improve the quality of life of the inhabitants. In the future, after entering the late and stable stage of urbanization, the planning and development should continue to adhere to the concept of people-oriented and sustainable development, pay attention to the quality of urban development, focus on the needs of urban residents, and maintain the stability of the urban vitality of the inner city; for example, in the subdistricts where the business office facilities are concentrated, consider increasing the open space such as small-scale parks, and the parks can be considered to be combined with the layout of recreation and leisure facilities to promote urban vitality. For example, in neighborhoods where business office facilities are concentrated, consider adding open spaces such as small parks and green spaces.

6.4. Limitations

This study could still be improved in several ways. First, social media check-in data and nighttime lighting indices rely heavily on electronic devices and remote sensing imagery. While these types of data have wide coverage and a representative sample size, there is a bias in the quantification of specific human behavioral characteristics (e.g., shopping, life interactions). Secondly, in the selection of indicators of driving factors, although the dimensions of subdistrict form and function are taken into account, there is a lack of attention to human subjective cognition such as the perception and preferences of neighborhood residents for the environment, and the indicator system of driving factors needs to be further supplemented. In terms of research methodology, machine learning algorithms such as random forests and decision trees can be considered in the future to explain the nonlinear relationship between urban vitality and its driving factors and other influencing effects.

7. Conclusions

This study aimed to investigate the spatial driving factors of subdistrict space in the spatio-temporal evolution of urban vitality in Changsha City. To achieve the research objective, the entropy weight method and spatial autocorrelation were used to conceptualize and measure the urban vitality and characterize its spatio-temporal evolution using two indicators, namely, social media check-ins and the nighttime lighting index. In addition, Geodetector and GTWR models were used to explore how the three dimensions of subdistrict form, subdistrict function, and subdistrict economy influence the aggregated characteristics of urban vitality, as well as how these influences evolve. Data from 81 subdistricts in the central city of Changsha, China, in 2013, 2017, and 2021 were collected for empirical analysis. The results of the study show the following:

(1)

The spatial and temporal distribution of urban vitality in the central district of Changsha City shows spatial differentiation characteristics, and the urban vitality was gathered in the south-central and southwestern districts in 2013, with a sporadic distribution. The south-central and southwestern regions showed a gradual agglomeration and distribution trend after 2017, and this continued to spread to the west and south in 2021. Low urban vitality subdistricts have long been concentrated in Wangcheng District in the north and Changsha County in the east, and the urban vitality value of the mountainous area in the southwest of Yuelu District is also low.

(2)

There was a significant spatial correlation in the distribution of urban vitality. The high–high type of urban vitality subdistricts were found to be clustered and distributed at the junction of the Furong, Yuhua, and Tianxin districts in the central part of the city, and then this gradually spread out from the center to the surrounding area. The low–low type of urban vitality subdistricts were found to mainly be located in the northern Wangcheng District, Kaifu District, and the northern part of Changsha County, before spreading to the south in 2021.

(3)

Subdistrict form and subdistrict function have a significant effect on urban vitality, while the effect of the economic dimension of the subdistrict is not significant. The aggregation of urban vitality is the result of a variety of factors. The interaction of entertainment, recreation, and business offices at the functional level of the subdistrict was the dominant factor affecting the intensity of urban vitality, while factors related to the level of income of the city’s inhabitants had the lowest interaction at the economic level.

(4)

The contribution of SHDI to the urban vitality intensity was most prominent, followed by DP. From the perspective of temporal evolution, the street pattern showed a positive contribution to urban vitality. As for the function of the subdistrict, except for the density of DS facilities, which had both a positive and a negative inhibitory effect on urban vitality at different times, the density of DP, DRL, and DBO all showed a positive contribution to urban vitality. In terms of the spatial distribution of the intensity of the role, the functional aspects of the subdistrict, SHDI, and RD filled an important role in promoting the urban vitality of the central subdistricts, as well as inhibiting the surrounding remote subdistricts, with SHDI playing a stronger role in promoting the urban vitality. In terms of subdistrict form, the effects of DP and DS on urban vitality were high in the west and low in the east, while the effects of DRL and DBO showed a spatial distribution pattern of gradual increase from the west to the east.