Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background and Significance of Studying Safety Status and Technological Development in Various Industries
1.2. Purpose and Objectives of the Article
- Evaluate Safety Status and Methods: Assess the current safety status and traditional health and safety methods in each industry, highlighting their limitations and areas for improvement. This includes a review of accident rates, fatalities, injuries, and the effectiveness of existing safety methods.
- Analyse Technological Advancements: Explore technological advancements and innovative solutions in the respective industries, discussing their impact on accident prevention, worker protection, and operational efficiency.
- Identify Common Challenges and Knowledge Transfer: Identify common challenges and trends across industries, analysing the potential for cross-industry knowledge transfer and collaboration. This involves a comparative analysis of safety practices to find commonalities and opportunities for collaboration.
- Highlight Gaps and Research Needs: Identify gaps in safety practices and technological adoption, providing insights for future research and development efforts to improve safety practices and promote technological innovation.
2. Methodology
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Data Selection
- Relevance: Articles that directly addressed safety challenges and technological solutions within the specified industries. Articles that were irrelevant or loosely related were excluded from the analysis.
- Recency: The search focused on the recent studies published within the last five years. This focus on recency was maintained to provide insights into the most current industry practices.
- Empirical Data and Case Studies: The inclusion of empirical data and case studies was emphasised. These types of articles were considered particularly valuable as they offer practical insights into safety practices and technological advancements.
- Language: To ensure consistent understanding and analysis, the authors considered only articles written in English.
2.3. Data Analysis
- Content Analysis: A systematic examination of the content within selected articles to identify recurring themes, safety challenges, and technological solutions.
- Cross-Industry Pattern Recognition: Identification of common trends and innovations across the various industries, allowing for the comparison of safety approaches and technological adoption.
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A qualitative assessment of similarities and differences in safety practices and technological advancements.
- Quantitative Data Extraction: Where available, relevant quantitative data from studies, such as accident rates, technology adoption percentages, or injury statistics, were extracted and compared.
2.4. Synthesis and Interpretation
2.5. Limitations
3. Safety Status and Technological Development in High-Risk Industries
3.1. Mining Industry
3.1.1. Safety Challenges in Mining Operations
- Cave-ins and Roof Falls: Underground mining exposes workers to the risk of cave-ins and roof falls, which can result in serious injuries or fatalities. Proper roof support systems, monitoring technologies, and training programs are essential to mitigate these risks [13].
- Explosions and Fires: The presence of flammable gases, dust, and ignition sources in mining operations can lead to explosions and fires. Effective ventilation systems, gas monitoring, and strict adherence to safety protocols are crucial to prevent such incidents [14].
- Exposure to Harmful Substances: Miners are often exposed to harmful substances such as silica dust, asbestos, and toxic gases, which can cause respiratory diseases and long-term health issues. Proper ventilation, personal protective equipment (PPE), and monitoring systems are critical to minimising exposure [15].
3.1.2. Most Occurring Mining Hazards and Risks
- Machinery Accidents: Mining machinery, such as haul trucks, loaders, and drilling equipment, can cause accidents if not operated and maintained properly. Safety protocols, equipment inspections, and operator training are vital to minimise the risk of machinery-related incidents [17].
- Noise and Vibration: Mining operations generate elevated levels of noise and vibration, which can lead to hearing loss and musculoskeletal disorders among workers. Engineering controls, regular monitoring, and the use of hearing protection devices are important to mitigate these hazards [18].
3.1.3. Safety Regulations and Practices in the Mining Industry
- The mining industry is subject to stringent safety regulations and practices to ensure the well-being of workers. These main regulations that are commonly used in the mining industry are the National Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standards: OSHA sets guidelines and regulations specific to the mining industry to address hazards, establish safe work practices, and enforce compliance [16,19].
3.1.4. Technological Advancements in Mining Safety
- Proximity Detection Systems: These systems use sensors and alarms to detect the presence of personnel or equipment in the vicinity of moving machinery, reducing the risk of collisions [21].
- Remote Monitoring and Control: Remote monitoring systems allow real-time monitoring of mining operations, enabling early detection of potential hazards and improved emergency response [22]. This includes event reporting and early warning safety systems based on the Internet of Things for underground mines [23].
- Automated and Remote-Controlled Machinery: The use of automated and remote-controlled machinery reduces the need for workers to be physically present in hazardous areas, minimising the risk of accidents and exposure to hazards [24].
3.2. Agriculture and Livestock Industry
3.2.1. Safety Concerns in Agricultural Activities
- Machinery-related injuries: Farm machinery, such as tractors, combines, and balers, pose significant risks if not operated and maintained properly [31].
- Falls: Working at heights, on slippery surfaces, or in unstable environments can lead to falls and subsequent injuries. This is due to the fact that workers often need to access elevated areas, such as the roofs of barns or storage structures, silos, or agricultural machinery. They may need to perform maintenance, inspections, or repairs in these areas. In addition, farming environments are frequently exposed to various weather conditions. Rain, snow, or the presence of liquids like water or animal waste can create slippery surfaces. Moreover, farming involves various tasks in environments that may not always be stable. For instance, uneven terrain, unstable ground due to the movement of heavy machinery, or working around large animals can create precarious conditions [32].
- Exposure to pesticides: Farmers may come into contact with pesticides during application, handling, or storage, leading to potential health effects [33].
3.2.2. Hazards and Risks in Farming and Livestock Operations
- Machinery hazards: Improper use, lack of maintenance, and inadequate guarding of machinery can lead to injuries or fatalities [31].
- Livestock-related hazards: Working with animals carries the risk of kicks, bites, or crush injuries [5].
- Chemical exposures: Farmers may encounter various chemicals, such as pesticides, fertilisers, and cleaning agents, which can cause acute or chronic health effects [33].
- Musculoskeletal injuries: Farm tasks often involve repetitive movements, heavy lifting, and awkward postures, contributing to musculoskeletal disorders [6].
3.2.3. Safety Standards and Practices in Agriculture
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations: OSHA sets standards and guidelines to ensure the safety and health of workers in agricultural settings [31].
- Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs): GAPs encompass guidelines and recommendations for safe farming practices, including proper use and storage of chemicals, equipment maintenance, and worker training [32].
- PPE: The use of PPE, such as gloves, safety glasses, and respirators, is essential for protecting workers from hazards in agriculture [31].
3.2.4. Role of Technology in Enhancing Agricultural Safety
- Automated machinery and robotics: Automation reduces the need for manual labour, minimising the risk of injuries associated with operating heavy machinery [32].
- Sensor-based systems: Sensors can monitor environmental conditions, detect equipment malfunctions, and provide real-time feedback to farmers, enhancing safety and efficiency [34].
- Animal handling and tracking systems: Technologies like electronic tagging and monitoring systems help track livestock health, prevent disease spread, and improve worker safety [5].
- Drones: In the agriculture industry, drones are used to inspect crops for pests and diseases and monitor livestock. For example, the DJI Agras T30 drone can be used to spray pesticides on crops, and it can also be used to monitor livestock for health problems [35].
3.3. Transportation Industry
3.3.1. Safety Issues in Transportation Sectors (Road, Rail, Aviation, and Maritime)
- Road transportation: Road traffic accidents are a significant concern, with factors such as driver error, speeding, impaired driving, and inadequate infrastructure contributing to the risks [12].
- Aviation: Aviation safety concerns encompass aircraft accidents, runway incursions, air traffic control errors, and pilot errors, among others [38].
- Maritime transportation: Hazards in the maritime industry include collisions, groundings, cargo handling incidents, and crew safety risks due to harsh weather conditions or inadequate safety procedures [39].
3.3.2. Common Transportation-Related Hazards and Risks
- Vehicle crashes: The risk of accidents, injuries, and fatalities is prevalent across all transportation sectors due to factors such as human error, mechanical failures, or adverse weather conditions [40].
- Exposure to hazardous materials: Transporting dangerous goods, including chemicals, gases, or radioactive materials, poses risks of spills, leaks, or explosions [41].
- Fatigue and stress: Long working hours, irregular schedules, and high-pressure environments contribute to fatigue and stress among transportation workers, affecting their performance and decision making [42].
- Ergonomic hazards: Workers involved in transportation may face ergonomic risks from prolonged sitting, repetitive movements, and awkward postures [12].
3.3.3. Safety Regulations and Measures in the Transportation Industry
- Road safety regulations: Governments establish traffic laws, speed limits, seatbelt requirements, and vehicle safety standards to promote safer road transportation [43].
- Railway safety standards: Rail authorities enforce safety regulations for track maintenance, train operation, signalling systems, and crew training [43].
- Aviation safety protocols: Aviation regulatory bodies mandate stringent safety standards for aircraft maintenance, pilot training, air traffic control, and airport security [44].
- Maritime safety conventions: International maritime organisations establish safety regulations for ship design, navigation, crew training, emergency procedures, and cargo handling [44].
3.3.4. Technological Advancements for Improving Transportation Safety
- Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS): ADAS technologies such as collision avoidance systems, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control enhance road vehicle safety [45].
- Positive train control (PTC): PTC systems use GPS, digital radio, and computer-based train control to monitor and control train movements, reducing the risk of collisions and overspeed incidents [46].
- Aviation safety technologies: Aircraft advancements include terrain awareness and warning systems, automatic dependent surveillance broadcasts, and improved weather monitoring to enhance aviation safety [46].
- Maritime safety innovations: Technologies like electronic chart displays and information systems, automatic identification systems, and enhanced radar systems improve navigation safety in the maritime industry [39].
- AI systems can be used to monitor driver behaviour, identify potential problems, and prevent accidents [39].
3.4. Healthcare Industry
3.4.1. Safety Challenges in Healthcare Settings (Hospitals, Clinics, Long-Term Care Facilities, among Others)
- Patient falls: Falls are a significant concern in healthcare facilities, particularly among older adults, and can lead to injuries and prolonged hospital stays [47].
- Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs): Infections acquired during healthcare delivery, such as surgical site infections or bloodstream infections, pose risks to patient safety.
- Medication errors: Errors in prescribing, dispensing, or administering medication can have serious consequences for patient safety [48].
- Workplace violence: Healthcare workers are at risk of physical and verbal assaults from patients, visitors, or even colleagues, impacting their safety and well-being [49].
3.4.2. Common Healthcare-Associated Hazards and Risks
- Biological hazards: Exposure to bloodborne pathogens, infectious diseases, or hazardous substances poses risks to healthcare workers and patients [50].
- Ergonomic hazards: Healthcare workers often perform physically demanding tasks, leading to musculoskeletal disorders and injuries [50].
- Radiation hazards: Healthcare professionals working with radiation equipment, such as X-rays or radiation therapy, face risks of radiation exposure [51].
- Psychosocial hazards: Emotional stress, burnout, and compassion fatigue are prevalent in healthcare settings, affecting the well-being of healthcare workers [52].
3.4.3. Safety Protocols and Practices in Healthcare Environments
- Infection control measures: Standard precautions, hand hygiene, proper sterilisation techniques, and isolation protocols are critical in preventing healthcare-associated infections [40].
- Medication safety practices: Robust medication reconciliation, barcoding systems, and double-checking procedures help reduce medication errors in healthcare settings [53].
- Violence prevention strategies: Implementing security measures, providing de-escalation training, and creating a culture of respect and zero-tolerance for violence can enhance workplace safety [49].
- Ergonomic interventions: Implementing proper lifting techniques, ergonomic equipment, and workstations designed for comfort and safety can reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries [52].
3.4.4. Technological Advancements for Patient Safety and Staff Well-Being
- Electronic health records (EHRs): EHR systems improve patient safety by facilitating accurate and timely access to patient information, reducing medication errors, and supporting clinical decision making [54].
- Patient monitoring systems: Advanced monitoring technologies, such as remote vital sign monitoring and wearable devices, enable real-time tracking of patients’ health status, enhancing patient safety and early detection of deterioration [4].
- Telehealth and telemedicine: Telehealth technologies provide remote access to healthcare services, improving patient access to care, reducing the risk of infections, and enhancing healthcare delivery efficiency [55].
3.4.5. Examples of Successful Safety Initiatives in Healthcare
- The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: Developed by the World Health Organization, this checklist ensures essential safety steps are followed before, during, and after surgical procedures, reducing surgical complications [56].
- Patient Safety Reporting Systems: Healthcare facilities utilise reporting systems to encourage healthcare workers to report safety incidents, near misses, and potential hazards, enabling proactive identification and mitigation of risks [57].
4. Discussion and Conclusions
4.1. Summary of the Main Findings from the Review of Various Industries
- Industry-Specific Hazards and Risk Recognition: The individualised risks faced by various industries, such as cave-ins in mining and chemical exposure in agriculture, underscore the importance of tailoring safety measures to project-specific hazards. This recognition is paramount for AECO professionals to identify similar risks in construction sites and implement context-specific safety strategies that effectively address these challenges.
- Adherence to safety regulations and best practices: While safety regulations and standards are prevalent across industries, their effectiveness can vary due to differences in implementation, enforcement, and environmental conditions. For example, a study by the International Labour Organization (ILO) found that only 50% of occupational accidents in the construction industry are covered by workers’ compensation schemes. This suggests that there is a need to improve the enforcement of safety regulations and ensure that workers have access to compensation when injured on the job.
- Technology: Technological advancements have significantly contributed to enhancing safety measures and reducing risks in various sectors, such as real-time monitoring systems and robotics automation Table 2. The claim that technological advancements significantly contribute to enhancing safety and risk reduction is substantiated by data from a variety of industries. For instance, a study by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that the rate of accidents in US coal mines fell by 50% between 2000 and 2019, coinciding with the increased use of real-time monitoring systems. The oil and gas industry has also seen a reduction in accidents due to technological advancements. For example, the use of automation technologies has helped to reduce the number of injuries and fatalities in oil and gas well drilling operations. A study by OSHA found that the rate of injuries and fatalities in oil and gas well drilling operations fell by 25% between 2010 and 2019, a period that coincided with the increased use of automation technologies. The use of automation technologies in the manufacturing industry has helped to reduce the number of injuries by eliminating the need for workers to perform dangerous tasks. For instance, another OSHA report found that the rate of injuries in the manufacturing industry fell by 15% between 2010 and 2019, coinciding with the increased use of automation technologies.
4.2. Implications for the Construction Industry and Potential Lessons Learned
- Recognising the industry-specific hazards and risks in construction: By closely examining industries with parallel challenges, such as mining’s underground risks or agriculture’s heavy machinery hazards [3]. The agriculture industry faces risks related to machinery accidents, falls, and exposure to chemicals [17]. Understanding these industry-specific hazards can help construction professionals identify similar risks in their projects and implement appropriate safety measures.
- Adhering to safety regulations and implementing best practices: Safety regulations and standards play a crucial role in ensuring worker protection and environmental sustainability across industries. Construction industry stakeholders should prioritise compliance with safety regulations and adopt best practices to create a safe working environment [16]. Lessons can be learned from the transportation industry, where strict regulations and measures are in place to mitigate risks associated with road, rail, aviation, and maritime activities [7]. By mirroring the transportation sector’s regulatory dedication, construction can instil a safety-centric ethos that permeates every project, from design to completion, thereby fostering a safer work environment.
- Embracing technological advancements in construction safety: Technology has transformed safety practices in various industries. Real-time monitoring systems, for instance, have been widely implemented in mining to track worker locations, monitor environmental conditions, and detect potential hazards [7]. Automation technologies have improved safety in the oil and gas industry by reducing human exposure to hazardous environments [9]. The construction industry can leverage these technological advancements, such as wearables, drones, and AI-based systems, to enhance safety measures and mitigate risks.
- Promoting a safety culture: The healthcare sector’s commitment to patient safety provides a valuable model for construction’s pursuit of a comprehensive safety culture. By integrating safety protocols, constant training, and stringent adherence to guidelines, the construction industry can emulate the healthcare sector’s success in cultivating a culture where safety is an intrinsic value. Some specific examples of how the construction industry can promote a safety culture include the following:
- Implementing safety protocols: The construction industry should implement safety protocols for all tasks, such as fall protection and lockout/tagout procedures. This is similar to the healthcare sector, where standardised procedures are used to reduce errors.
- Providing training: Workers should receive regular safety training on the specific risks associated with their work. This is like the transportation and aviation industry, where personnel receive extensive training on safety procedures.
- Encouraging communication: Workers should be encouraged to communicate openly and honestly about safety concerns, such as in the healthcare sector, where workers are encouraged to report all incidents, even minor ones.
- Creating a culture of accountability: Workers should be held accountable for following safety procedures. This is comparable to the mining industry, where workers should be held accountable for their actions.
- 5.
- Collaboration and sharing of best practices: The review of different industries highlights the importance of collaboration and sharing of best practices in improving safety outcomes. Construction professionals can benefit from establishing partnerships and knowledge-sharing platforms with other industries, promoting cross-industry learning and innovation in safety management. For example, industry associations can be established to facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing. Safety data can also be shared between industries to identify trends and develop preventive measures.
- Real-time monitoring systems can be used to track the location of workers and equipment, as well as environmental conditions such as air quality and noise levels. This information can be used to identify potential hazards and take steps to mitigate them. For example, a system could be used to track the location of workers in a confined space and sound an alarm if they stray too close to a hazardous area. Another example is intelligent and vision-based fire detection systems. These systems are created as a convolutional neural network which can be adapted to any environment [68].
- AI-based predictive analytics can be used to analyse data on accidents and injuries to identify patterns and trends. This information can then be used to develop targeted safety interventions. For example, an AI system could be used to identify workers who are at increased risk of injury and provide them with additional training or safety equipment.
- Robotics can be used to perform dangerous or repetitive tasks, such as welding or demolition. This can help to reduce the risk of accidents and injuries to workers. For example, robots could be used to demolish structurally unsound buildings, a task that humans currently perform.
- Fatigue detection technologies can be used to monitor worker alertness and prevent drowsy driving. This can help to reduce the risk of accidents caused by fatigue. For example, a wearable device could be used to track workers’ heart rate and eye movement to identify signs of fatigue.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, H.; Li, H.; Goh, Y.M. A review of construction safety climate: Definitions, factors, relationship with safety behavior and research agenda. Saf. Sci. 2021, 142, 105391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidani, A.; Martins, J.P.; Soeiro, A. BIM approaches for enhanced health and safety status in construction—Protocol fora systematic review. Int. J. Occu. Environ. Saf. 2022, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, S.N.; Ramli, A.; Aziz, H.A. Influencing factors on safety culture in mining industry: A systematic literature review approach. Resour. Policy 2021, 74, 102250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGrath, S.; Taenzer, A.H.; Karon, N.; Blike, G. Surveillance monitoring management for general care units: Strategy, design, and implementation. Jt. Commun. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2016, 42, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svendsen, K.; Aas, O.; Hilt, B. Non-fatal Occupational Injuries in Norwegian Farmers. Saf. Health Work 2014, 5, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bongiovanni, R.; Lowenberg-Deboer, J. Precision agriculture and sustainability. Precis. Agric. 2004, 5, 359–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Ray, S.K.; Bhuiyan, M.M.I.; Sabuj, S.R. A study on road accident prediction and contributing factors using explainable machine learning models: Analysis and performance. Trans Res. Interdisci. Perspect. 2023, 19, 100814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arana-Landín, G.; Laskurain-Iturbe, I.; Iturrate, M.; Landeta-Manzano, B. Assessing the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on occupational health and safety. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzman, J.; Recoco, G.A.; Pandi, A.W.; Padrones, J.M.; Ignacio, J.J. Evaluating workplace safety in the oil and gas industry during the COVID-19 pandemic using occupational health and safety Vulnerability Measure and partial least square Structural Equation Modelling. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 6, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurostat. Statistics Explained—Accidents at Work Statistics. Eurostat Statistics Explained 2021; pp. 1–7. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Accidents_at_work_-_statistics_by_economic_activity#Developments_over_time (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- CDC. Healthcare Workers|NIOSH|CDC. CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/healthcare/ (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- European Agency for Safety & Health at Work—Information, Statistics, Legislation and Risk Assessment Tools. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Mark, C.; Gauna, M. Preventing roof fall fatalities during pillar recovery: A ground control success story. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; You, G. Monitoring System for Coal Mine Safety Based on Wireless Sensor Network. In Proceedings of the 2019 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference (CSQRWC), Taiyuan, China, 18–21 July 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries in 2010 (Preliminary Results). Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2017; pp. 1–13. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2023).
- Laurence, D. Safety rules and regulations on mine sites—The problem and a solution. J. Saf. Res. 2005, 36, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruff, T.; Coleman, P.; Martini, L. Machine-related injuries in the US mining industry and priorities for safety research. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2010, 18, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, W.; Luo, Z.; Wang, J.; Cao, C.R.; Shu, C.M. Experimental study of the influence of coal mine noise on miners. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2022, 80, 104926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Department of Labor. OSHA Regulation—3021-12R 2019—Workers Rights—Construction Documents and Templates. 2019. Available online: https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/osha3021.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2023).
- Mine Safety and Health Administration. Federal Regulatory Guide; CQ Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; pp. 883–886. [CrossRef]
- Navon, R.; Goldschmidt, E.; Shpatnisky, Y. A concept proving prototype of automated earthmoving control. Autom. Constr. 2004, 13, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groves, W.A.; Kecojevic, V.J.; Komljenovic, D. Analysis of fatalities and injuries involving mining equipment. J. Saf. Res. 2007, 38, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, B.W.; Khan, R.M.A. An event reporting and early-warning safety system based on the internet of things for underground coal mines: A case study. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y. Remote Real-Time Monitoring System for Mine Slope Based on Cloud Computing. Water 2022, 14, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, W.; Guo, C.; Zhang, S.; Peng, H.; Xu, C.; Ma, Q.; Yuan, M.; Zhou, W.; Guo, L.; Cheng, L. Optimisation of spraying dust reduction technology of continuous miner machine and the dust environment in a tunnel, based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology. Powder Technol. 2022, 398, 117044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, C.; Rutherford, S.; Agranovski, I. Particulate emission rates for open surfaces in Australian open cut black coal mines. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, S.M.; Choi, Y.; Suh, J. Applications of the open-source hardware Arduino platform in the mining industry: A review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svertoka, E.; Saafi, S.; Rusu-Casandra, A.; Burget, R.; Marghescu, I.; Hosek, J.; Ometov, A. Wearables for industrial work safety: A survey. Sensors 2021, 21, 3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavur, M.; Demir, E. RSSI-based hybrid algorithm for real-time tracking in underground mining by using RFID technology. Phys. Commun. 2022, 55, 101863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyder, Z.; Siau, K.; Nah, F. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and autonomous technologies in mining industry. J. Database Manag. 2022, 30, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heldman, D.R.; Moraru, C.I. Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food, and Biological Engineering; Print Version; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorp, K. Precision agriculture. In Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 515–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tessema, R.A.; Nagy, K.; Ádám, B. Occupational and environmental pesticide exposure and associated health risks among pesticide applicators and non-applicator residents in rural Ethiopia. Front. Public Heal. 2022, 10, 1017189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bui, X.N.; Lee, C.W.; Nguyen, H.; Bui, H.B.; Long, N.Q.; Le, Q.T.; Nguyen, V.D.; Nguyen, N.B.; Moayedi, H. Estimating PM10 concentration from drilling operations in open-pit mines using an assembly of SVR and PSO. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayamga, M.; Akaba, S.; Nyaaba, A.A. Multifaceted applicability of drones: A review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 167, 120677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U. S. DOT. Role of Human Factors in Rail Accidents. Available online: https://www.transportation.gov/testimony/role-human-factors-rail-accidents (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Responsibilities|US Department of Transportation. Available online: https://www.transportation.gov/priorities/safety (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Safety Management System (SMS) and Voluntary Safety Programs|Federal Aviation Administration. Available online: https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airline_certification/air_carrier/cert_volun_safety_program (accessed on 10 June 2023).
- Cao, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z. Research in marine accidents: A bibliometric analysis, systematic review and future directions. Ocean. Eng. 2023, 284, 115048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Global Report on Infection Prevention and Control. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/06-05-2022-who-launches-first-ever-global-report-on-infection-prevention-and-control (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Guo, J.; Luo, C. Risk assessment of hazardous materials transportation: A review of research progress in the last thirty years. J. Traffic Trans. Eng. (Eng. Ed.) 2022, 9, 571–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horberry, T.; Hartley, L.; Krueger, G.; Mabbott, N. Fatigue Detection Technologies for Drivers: A Review of Existing Operator-Centred Systems. In IEE Conference Publication, Proceedings of the 2001 People in Control. The Second International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, Manchester, UK, 19–21 June 2001; Institution of Engineering and Technology: Stevenage, UK, 2001; pp. 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U. S. D. of Transportation. Pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration. Fed. Regist. 2009, 74, 62503–62506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pernice, D. Tourism: Fact Sheets on the European Union—European Parliament. 2022; pp. 1–7. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/134/aviation-safety (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Masello, L.; Castignani, G.; Sheehan, B.; Murphy, F.; McDonnell, K. On the road safety benefits of advanced driver assistance systems in different driving contexts. Trans. Res. Interdisci. Perspect. 2022, 15, 100670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frittelli, J. Positive train control (PTC): Overview and policy issues. In U.S. Transit, Transportation and Infrastructure: Considerations and Developments;2013; Volume 3, pp. 119–140. Available online: https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R42637.html (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Oliver, D.; Healey, F.; Haines, T. Preventing falls and fall-related injuries in Hospitals. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2010, 26, 645–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Partin, B. Preventing medication errors: An iom report. Nurse Pract. 2006, 31, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Gan, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, L.; Dwyer, R.; Lu, K.; Yan, S.; Sampson, O.; Xu, H.; Wang, C.; et al. Prevalence of workplace violence against healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 2019, 76, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lucas, J.B. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Contact Dermat. 2023, 3, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goula, A.; Chatzis, A.; Stamouli, M.A.; Kelesi, M.; Kaba, E.; Brilakis, E. Assessment of health professionals’ attitudes on radiation protection measures. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magnavita, N.; Heponiemi, T. Violence towards health care workers in a Public Health Care Facility in Italy: A repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciapponi, A.; Nievas, S.E.F.; Seijo, M.; Rodríguez, M.B.; Vietto, V.; García-Perdomo, H.A.; Virgilio, S.; Fajreldines, A.V.; Tost, J.; Rose, C.J.; et al. Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; John Wiley and Sons, Inc. and the Cochrane Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumenthal, D.; Tavenner, M. The ‘Meaningful Use’ Regulation for Electronic Health Records. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashshur, R.L.; Howell, J.D.; Krupinski, E.A.; Harms, K.M.; Bashshur, N.; Doarn, C.R. The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care. Telemed. J. E. Health 2016, 22, 342–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009—Safe Surgery Saves Lives. WHO/IER/PSP/2008.08-1E. Second Glob. Patient Saf. Chall 2013, 6, 133. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241598552 (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Shoemaker-Hunt, S.; Hall, K.; Hoffman, L. Advancing Patient Safety: Reviews From the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Making Healthcare Safer III Report. J. Patient Saf. 2020, 16 (Suppl. S1), S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chassin, M.R.; Loeb, J.M. High-Reliability Health Care: Getting There from Here. Milbank Q. 2013, 91, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Occupational Safety and Health Branch Labour Department. Code of Practice on Safety Safety Management. 2022; pp. 1–125. Available online: http://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/public/os/manage.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2018).
- Gernand, J.M. Evaluating the effectiveness of mine safety enforcement actions in forecasting the lost-days rate at specific worksites. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng. 2016, 2, 041002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, A.; Verburg, A.; Tukkaraja, P. Internet of Things–Based Command Center to Improve Emergency Response in Underground Mines. Saf. Health Work 2022, 13, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- JCI. Quality Management and Patient Safety. JCI. Available online: https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/what-we-offer/advisory-services/quality-management-and-patient-safety/?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=cpcjci&utm_campaign=jcic_gaqualitymgmt&gclid=Cj0KCQjwm66pBhDQARIsALIR2zAPJxkY34TjmZTkOAf9I4FPiHiHxkkggLKZky1oq (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Azami-Aghdash, S.; Gorji, H.; Gharaee, H.; Moosavi, A.; Sadeghi-Bazargani, H. Role of health sector in road traffic injuries prevention: A public health approach. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2021, 12, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Revised Hours-of-Service Rule to Help Ensure Truck Drivers Get Adequate Rest. Available online: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/newsroom/revised-hours-service-rule-help-ensure-truck-drivers-get-adequate-rest (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Morrow, S.L.; Koves, G.K.; Barnes, V.E. Exploring the relationship between safety culture and safety performance in U.S. nuclear power operations. Saf. Sci. 2014, 69, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Xue, Z.; Ding, Z.; Chen, S. Current Status and Future Directions of Construction Safety Climate: Visual Analysis Based on WOS Database. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CLiang, J.; Cheng, M.H. Trends in Robotics Research in Occupational Safety and Health: A Scientometric Analysis and Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, F.; Gharajeh, M.S. Intelligent and vision-based fire detection systems: A survey. Image Vis. Comput. 2019, 91, 103803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Industry | Highest Occurring H&S Hazards |
---|---|
Construction | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, overexertion, machinery accidents |
Mining | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, cave-ins, explosions |
Agriculture and livestock | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, machinery accidents, animal bites |
Transportation | Vehicle accidents, falls, exposure to hazardous substances, overexertion |
Health care | Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs); exposure to infectious diseases; slips, trips, and falls; violence and aggression; chemical exposure; radiation exposure; stress and mental health |
Industry | Technological Advancements | Mitigated H&S Hazards | Challenges of Adopting Technological Advancements |
---|---|---|---|
Construction | Wearable devices, AR, robotics, and drones | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, overexertion, machinery accidents | High cost of technology, training required for workers |
Mining | Proximity detection systems, remote-controlled mining equipment, and autonomous vehicles | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, overexertion, machinery accidents | High cost of technology, training required for workers, harsh environmental conditions |
Agriculture and livestock | Precision agriculture, farm automation, and wearable devices | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, overexertion, machinery accidents | High cost of technology, training required for workers, changing weather conditions |
Transportation | Collision avoidance systems, driver monitoring systems, and fatigue detection systems | Falls, exposure to hazardous substances, overexertion, machinery accidents | High cost of technology, training required for workers, public acceptance |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sidani, A.; Poças Martins, J.; Soeiro, A. Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries. Buildings 2023, 13, 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112885
Sidani A, Poças Martins J, Soeiro A. Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries. Buildings. 2023; 13(11):2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112885
Chicago/Turabian StyleSidani, Adeeb, João Poças Martins, and Alfredo Soeiro. 2023. "Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries" Buildings 13, no. 11: 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112885
APA StyleSidani, A., Poças Martins, J., & Soeiro, A. (2023). Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries. Buildings, 13(11), 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112885