Next Article in Journal
Deformation Analysis of Novel Sorbite Stainless Steel-Aluminum Alloy Attached Lifting Protection Platform
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Vulnerability Assessment of Rainwater Pipe Networks: An Advanced Fuzzy Borda Combination Evaluation Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of RC–UHPC Slabs with EPS Lightweight Concrete Core
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving School Reconstruction Projects Satisfaction Outcomes Using Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neutrosophic Autocratic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Strategies for Building Material Supplier Selection

1
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
2
Department of Business Administration, China University of Technology, Taipei 11695, Taiwan
3
Department of Food Science and Technology, Taipei University of Marine Technology, Taipei 11174, Taiwan
4
Department of Mathematics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar 4741613534, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(6), 1373; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061373
Submission received: 7 April 2023 / Revised: 4 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023

Abstract

Because of the intricate nature of real-world scenarios, experts could encounter many ambiguities throughout the decision-making (DM) process. Adopting a DM strategy in conditions of indeterminacy so that the decision makers are limited to a small number of experts is always helpful in real life. Neutrosophic conception is a convenient technique for handling inconsistent, ambiguous, and uncertain values. This research presents an autocratic DM strategy based on Neutrosophic Sets (NSs) to address these ambiguities. The essential component of the suggested technique is the conversion of diverse management decision and weight matrices into a unified evaluation matrix. Supplier Selection (SS) is a multi-criteria decision-making problem where a limited number of alternative suppliers are evaluated using a limited set of criteria. The suggested methodology based on different score functions is applied to SS issues involving construction materials. The numerical illustrations indicate the success of the introduced method in selecting the best supplier with the least computational complexity. The important point obtained in this research is that adopting a suitable score function appropriate to the characteristics of the data plays an important role in the decision-making process.
Keywords: decision making; construction supply chain; neutrosophic sets; building management; score function; autocratic strategy decision making; construction supply chain; neutrosophic sets; building management; score function; autocratic strategy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nafei, A.; Huang, C.-Y.; Chen, S.-C.; Huo, K.-Z.; Lin, Y.-C.; Nasseri, H. Neutrosophic Autocratic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Strategies for Building Material Supplier Selection. Buildings 2023, 13, 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061373

AMA Style

Nafei A, Huang C-Y, Chen S-C, Huo K-Z, Lin Y-C, Nasseri H. Neutrosophic Autocratic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Strategies for Building Material Supplier Selection. Buildings. 2023; 13(6):1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nafei, Amirhossein, Chien-Yi Huang, Shu-Chuan Chen, Kuang-Zong Huo, Yi-Ching Lin, and Hadi Nasseri. 2023. "Neutrosophic Autocratic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Strategies for Building Material Supplier Selection" Buildings 13, no. 6: 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061373

APA Style

Nafei, A., Huang, C.-Y., Chen, S.-C., Huo, K.-Z., Lin, Y.-C., & Nasseri, H. (2023). Neutrosophic Autocratic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Strategies for Building Material Supplier Selection. Buildings, 13(6), 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop