Exploring the Benefits of Virtual Reality Adoption for Successful Construction in a Developing Economy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Background
2.1. Application of Virtual Reality Practices
2.1.1. Pre-Construction/Design Phase
2.1.2. Construction Phase
2.1.3. Post-Construction Phase
2.2. Benefits of Using Virtual Reality for Construction Projects
2.2.1. Pre-Contract Stage Planning
2.2.2. Post-Contract Stage Planning
2.2.3. Quality Control and Sustainability
2.2.4. Design Flexibility and Reputation
2.2.5. Resource Management
2.2.6. Risk Management and Digitalization
2.2.7. Summary of Literature on the Benefits of Virtual Reality
3. Research Methods
3.1. MARCOS Method
3.2. Exploratory Factor Analysis
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Demographic Background Information of Respondents
4.2. Benefits of Utilizing Virtual Reality
4.3. Categories of Virtual Reality Benefits
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Managerial Implications
- It presents a comprehensive database of the benefits of VR implementation and its various components.
- Building owners and other key industry players are provided with a robust platform for evaluating VR implementation to enhance the planning and execution of building projects.
- It provides scientific evidence and guidance for the adoption of VR in Nigeria and other developing countries.
- While most research efforts have focused on implementing construction cyber technology in developed countries, there is a scarcity of studies in developing countries like Nigeria.
6.2. Theoretical Implications
6.3. Limitation and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sbci, U. Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers. United Nations Environmental Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2009; pp. 1–62. [Google Scholar]
- US Department of Energy. Energy Efficiency Trends in Residential and Commercial Buildings; US Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. Available online: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/corporate/bt_stateindustry.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Atanasiu, B.; Attia, S. Principles for nearly zero-energy buildings: Paving the way for effective implementation of policy requirements. In Principles for Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings: Paving the Way for Effective Implementation of Policy Requirements; BPIE: Siromanipur, India, 2011; p. 124. [Google Scholar]
- Kineber, A.F.; Othman, I.; Oke, A.E.; Chileshe, N.; Buniya, M.K. Identifying and Assessing Sustainable Value Management Implementation Activities in Developing Countries:The Case of Egypt. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beach, T.H.; Rana, O.F.; Rezgui, Y.; Parashar, M. Cloud computing for the architecture, engineering & construction sector: Requirements, prototype & experience. J. Cloud Comput. Adv. Syst. Appl. 2013, 2, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Ahuja, V.; Yang, J.; Shankar, R. Study of ICT adoption for building project management in the Indian construction industry. Autom. Constr. 2009, 18, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ganesan, M.; Kor, A.-L.; Pattinson, C.; Rondeau, E. Green Cloud Software Engineering for Big Data Processing. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spychalska-Wojtkiewicz, M. The Relation between Sustainable Development Trends and Customer Value Management. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brundtland, G.H.; Khalid, M.; Agnelli, S.; Al-Athel, S.; Chidzero, B. Our common future. Environ. Conserv. 1987, 14, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kibert, C. Final Session of First International Conference of CIB TG 16 on Sustainable Construction; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Hill, R.C.; Bowen, P.A. Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1997, 15, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolstenholme, A.; Austin, S.A.; Bairstow, M.; Blumenthal, A.; Lorimer, J.; McGuckin, S.; Rhys Jones, S.; Ward, D.; Whysall, D.; Le Grand, Z. Never Waste a Good Crisis: A Review of Progress Since Rethinking Construction and Thoughts for Our Future; Constructing Excellence: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Kang, S.-C.; Al-Hussein, M. Virtual reality applications for the built environment: Research trends and opportunities. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haggard, K.E. Case Study on Virtual Reality in Construction. Aviat. Week Space Technol. 2017, 160, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Y.; Du, J.; Lavy, S.; Zhao, D. A multiuser shared virtual environment for facility management. Procedia Eng. 2016, 145, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jingmond, M.; Ågren, R. Unravelling causes of defects in construction. Constr. Innov. 2015, 15, 198–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aljassmi, H.; Han, S. Analysis of causes of construction defects using fault trees and risk importance measures. ASCE 2013, 139, 870–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behzadi, A. Using augmented and virtual reality technology in the construction industry. Am. J. Eng. Res. 2016, 5, 350–353. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, S. A review on using opportunities of augmented reality and virtual reality in construction project management. Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr. Int. J. 2018, 10, 1839–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baeza, E. Applications of Virtual Reality in Construction. 2018. Available online: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=cmsp (accessed on 30 May 2023).
- Kineber, A.F.; Oke, A.E.; Alyanbaawi, A.; Abubakar, A.S.; Hamed, M.M. Exploring the Cloud Computing Implementation Drivers for Sustainable Construction Projects—A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashabsheh, A.K.; Alzoubi, H.H.; Ali, M.Z. The application of virtual reality technology in architectural pedagogy for building constructions. Alex. Eng. J. 2019, 58, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Li, H.; Kho, S.Y. VR-embedded BIM immersive system for QS engineering education. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2018, 26, 626–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rady, M.; Kineber, A.F.; Hamed, M.M.; Daoud, A.O. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling of Constraint Factors Affecting Project Performance in the Egyptian Building Industry. Mathematics 2023, 11, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kineber, A.F.; Oke, A.E.; Hamed, M.M.; Rached, E.F.; Elmansoury, A.; Alyanbaawi, A.J.S. A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling of Robotics Implementation for Sustainable Building Projects: A Case in Nigeria. Sustainability 2022, 15, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, R.; Perlman, A.; Barak, R. Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2013, 31, 1005–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thamboo, J.A.; Zahra, T.; Dhanasekar, R. Development of design methodology for mortarless masonry system: Case study—A resettlement housing colony. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 27, 100973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oke, A.E.; Farouk Kineber, A.; Abdel-Tawab, M.; Abubakar, A.S.; Albukhari, I.; Kingsley, C. Barriers to the implementation of cloud computing for sustainable construction in a developing economy. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 2021, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, A.; Henriques, P.; Ferreira, P. Virtual Reality technology applied in Civil Engineering education. Proc. m-ICTE 2006, 4, 1351–1355. [Google Scholar]
- Moynihan, M.C.; Allwood, J.M. Utilization of structural steel in buildings. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2014, 470, 20140170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oke, A.E.; Kineber, A.F.; Akindele, O.; Ekundayo, D. Determining the Stationary Barriers to the implementation of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology in an emerging construction industry. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2023. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilliaho, K.; Nordquist, B.; Wallentèn, P.; Hamid, A.A.; Lahdensivu, J. Energy saving and indoor climate effects of an added glazed facade to a brick wall building: Case study. J. Build. Eng. 2016, 7, 246–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alrashed, F.; Asif, M. Challenges facing the application of zero-energy homes in Saudi Arabia: Construction industry and user perspective. In Proceedings of the ZEMCH 2012 International Conference, Glasgow, UK, 20–22 August 2012; pp. 20–22. [Google Scholar]
- Metin, B.; Tavil, A. Environmental assessment of external wall cladding construction. Arch. Sci. Rev. 2014, 57, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arif, M.; Bendi, D.; Sawhney, A.; Iyer, K. State of offsite construction in India-Drivers and barriers. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2012, 364, 012109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Femi, O.T. Effects of faulty construction on building maintenance. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Emerg. Eng. Res. 2014, 2, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
- Dadu, D.; Stanley, A.; Usman, J.; Sa’ad, M.; Ogunsanya, K. Quality Control in Abuja Mass Housing. In Proceedings of the West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, 10th Anniversary Conference, Accra, Ghana, 5–7 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Stepinac, M.; Šušteršič, I.; Gavrić, I.; Rajčić, V. Seismic design of timber buildings: Highlighted challenges and future trends. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wiberg, A.H.; Løvhaug, S.; Mathisen, M.; Tschoerner, B.; Resch, E.; Erdt, M.; Prasolova-Førland, E. Visualisation of KPIs in zero emission neighbourhoods for improved stakeholder participation using virtual reality. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 323, 012074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanzode, A.; Fisher, M.; Reed, D. Challenges and benefits of implementing virtual design and construction technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems on large healthcare project. In Proceedings of the CIB 24th W78 Conference, Heraklion, Greece, 10–12 July 2023; pp. 205–212. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, F.K.; Chan, A.P.; Wong, A.K.; Hon, C.K.; Choi, T.N. Electrical and mechanical safety in construction. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sustainable Urbanization, Hong Kong, China, 7–9 January 2015; p. 106. [Google Scholar]
- Portman, M.E.; Natapov, A.; Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2015, 54, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, L.P.; Vance, J.M. Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: A survey. Virtual Real. 2017, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carreira, P.; Castelo, T.; Gomes, C.C.; Ferreira, A.; Ribeiro, C.; Costa, A.A. Virtual reality as integration environments for facilities management: Application and users perception. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2018, 25, 90–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadehsalehi, S.; Hadavi, A.; Huang, J.C. Virtual reality for design and construction education environment. In AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions—The National Agenda; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2019; pp. 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, D.; Lucas, J. Virtual reality simulation for construction safety promotion. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2015, 22, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getuli, V.; Giusti, T.; Capone, P.; Sorbi, T.; Bruttini, A. A project framework to introduce virtual reality in construction health and safety. AlmaDL J. New Front. Constr. Manag. Work 2018, 9, 166–175. [Google Scholar]
- Getuli, V.; Capone, P.; Bruttini, A.; Isaac, S. BIM-based immersive Virtual Reality for construction workspace planning: A safety-oriented approach. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davila Delgado, J.M.; Oyedele, L.; Beach, T.; Demian, P. Augmented and virtual reality in construction: Drivers and limitations for industry adoption. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04020079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutesi, E.T.; Kyakula, M. Application of ICT in the Construction Industry in Kampala. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 29–30 September 2022; pp. 263–269. [Google Scholar]
- Vasista, T.; Abone, A. Benefits, barriers and applications of information communication technology in construction industry: A contemporary study. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moshood, T.D.; Nawanir, G.; Sorooshian, S.; Mahmud, F.; Adeleke, A.Q. Barriers and benefits of ICT adoption in the Nigerian construction industry. A comprehensive literature review. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2020, 3, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, R.; Knodler, M.; Fisher, D.L.; Samuel, S. Virtual reality headset training: Can it be used to improve young drivers’ latent hazard anticipation and mitigation skills. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2018, 2672, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lew, Y.; Toh, T.; Lim, K.; Yan, F.; Yow, L. A study on the constraints of implementing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Malaysian Construction Industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 385, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, K.J.; Raja, V.; White, A.; Tsinopoulos, C.-D. Adoption of virtual reality within construction processes: A factor analysis approach. Technovation 2006, 26, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastug, E.; Bennis, M.; Médard, M.; Debbah, M. Toward interconnected virtual reality: Opportunities, challenges, and enablers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iglesias-Rogers, G. The Hispanic-Anglosphere from the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Century: An Introduction; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Goulding, J.S.; Rahimian, F.P.; Wang, X. Virtual reality-based cloud BIM platform for integrated AEC projects. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2014, 19, 308–325. [Google Scholar]
- Nandavar, A.; Petzold, F.; Nassif, J.; Schubert, G. Interactive Virtual Reality Tool for BIM Based on IFC-Development of OpenBIM and Game Engine Based Layout Planning Tool-A Novel Concept to Integrate BIM and VR with Bi-Directional Data Exchange. In Proceedings of the 23rd CAADRIA Conference, Beijing, China, 17–19 May 2018; Fukuda, T., Huang, W., Janssen, P., Crolla, K., Alhadidi, S., Eds.; Tsinghua University: Beijing, China, 2018; pp. 453–462. [Google Scholar]
- Oladapo, A. The impact of ICT on professional practice in the Nigerian construction industry. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries 2006, 24, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stević, Ž.; Pamučar, D.; Puška, A.; Chatterjee, P.J.C.; Engineering, I. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 140, 106231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.H.; Elyamany, A.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Kineber, A.F.; Daoud, A.O. Modelling the relationship between modular construction adoption and critical success factors for residential projects in developing countries. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2023, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kineber, A.F.; Hamed, M.M. Exploring the Sustainable Delivery of Building Projects in Developing Countries: A PLS-SEM Approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kineber, A.F.; Massoud, M.M.; Hamed, M.M.; Alhammadi, Y.; Al-Mhdawi, M.K.S. Impact of Overcoming BIM Implementation Barriers on Sustainable Building Project Success: A PLS-SEM Approach. Buildings 2023, 13, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
S/N | Variables | [15] | [48] | [49] | [55] | [22] | [18] | [47,48] | [13] | [56] | [57] | [49] | [23] | [45] | [53] | [45] | [44] | [58] | [59] | [50] | [60] | [51] | [54] | [52] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enhance communication and collaboration | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||
2 | Reduce construction time | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||
3 | Reduce construction cost | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||
4 | Enhance workers’ safety training | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||
5 | Enhance construction scheduling | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Enhance design clash detection | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Safety planning | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||
8 | Risk identification | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | Enhance design efficiency | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Enhance construction planning | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | Enable immersive visualization | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||
12 | Overcome shortage of fit workforce | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Avoid defects | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Identify design flaws | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
15 | Improve project performance | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Improve company’s image | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Enhance accurate quantity take-off | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Enhance maintenance | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
19 | Digitalization | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Reduce mistakes in documentation | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
21 | Enhance fast project delivery | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | Reduce construction error | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
23 | Ease complex task | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
24 | Enhance sustainable construction | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Enable quality decision-making | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Integrate workflow | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
27 | Improve productivity | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
28 | Improve quality | * | * | * |
S/N | Topic | Year | Author | Methodology | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | BIM-based immersive virtual reality for construction workspace planning | 2020 | Getuli et al. [48] | Qualitative research design | The findings support that modern information technologies can be used to enhance both the safety protocols outlined in a project’s health and safety plan and the configuration of workspaces in the project’s site plan. |
B | Barriers and benefits of ICT adoption in the Nigerian construction industry. A comprehensive literature review | 2020 | Moshood et al. [52] | Review of literature | The ICT adoption process is viewed as an interaction between technology, a task, and an individual. Even though both practitioners and academics consider ICT as an opportunity, its sole application does not ensure success in the industry’s approval. Companies can profit from ICT when users accept the technology and investigate its adoption difficulties. |
C | Virtual reality applications for the built environment: Research trends and opportunities | 2020 | Zhang et al. [13] | Quantitative research design | Future study directions include user-centered adaptive design, VR information systems driven by human cognition, human factors-integrated construction training systems, occupant-centered facility management, and industry adoption. |
D | Augmented and virtual reality in construction: Drivers and limitations for industry adoption | 2020 | Davila Delgado et al. [49] | Qualitative and quantitative research design | To effectively minimize the limiting factors and amplify the driving forces, the study categorized and grouped a wide range of limiting and driving factors. Additionally, it provided an approach with precise short- and long-term actions to boost adoption. |
E | The application of virtual reality technology in architectural pedagogy for building constructions | 2019 | Bashabsheh et al. [22] | Quantitative research design | The three axes may be achieved more effectively using VR software than conventional teaching techniques. In conclusion, students benefit effectively from utilizing the VR program as a tool in building construction classes. |
F | A study on the constraints of implementing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Malaysian construction industry | 2019 | Lew et al. [54] | Quantitative research design | The enhancement of measurement accuracy, the reduction in paper usage through digitization, and the facilitation of quick information exchange within the project team are the top three advantages of ICT adoption in the Malaysian construction sector. |
G | Virtual reality for design and construction | 2019 | Alizadehsalehi et al. [45] | Review of literature | Students are better able to understand their learning plan following their virtual encounter. The three primary advantages of employing VR comprise visualizing complicated project designs, comprehending designs more quickly, and fostering innovation. |
H | A project framework to introduce virtual reality in construction health and safety | 2018 | Getuli et al. [48] | Review of literature | At the conclusion, review current suggestions in this area of construction health and safety as they relate to ICT technologies. A project structure will then be able to support future research and applications on the application of Building Information Modeling (BIM)-enabled VR. |
I | A review on using opportunities of augmented reality and virtual reality in construction project management | 2018 | Ahmed [19] | Review of literature | Construction project scheduling, progress monitoring, employee training, safety management, time and cost management, and quality management all effectively use augmented reality. |
J | Virtual reality headset training: Can it be used to improve young drivers’ latent hazard anticipation and mitigation skills | 2018 | Agrawal et al. [53] | Experimental research design | The capacity of drivers to recognize and counteract latent 20 threats is improved by VR headset-based training programs. |
K | Applications of virtual reality in construction | 2018 | Fernandes et al. [55] | Qualitative research design | The findings indicate a 50/50 split in favor of user-friendliness. While the office staff and senior levels urge technology to save time and, most crucially, money, seasoned field veterans had a difficult time adapting to the new software and altering their methods for accomplishing things. |
L | Interactive virtual reality tool for BIM based on IFC | 2018 | Nandavar et al. [59] | Review of literature | This research offers original Open BIM-compliant solutions. It provides a wider variety of interactions and capabilities than the top-performing method for bringing IFC models into VR currently on the market. Nevertheless, it cannot handle extremely big BIM models, unlike the commercially available BIM-VR systems, and has not yet produced a high-quality representation of the model in VR. |
M | Benefits, barriers and applications of information communication technology in construction industry: A contemporary study | 2018 | Vasista and Abone [51] | Qualitative research design | ICT may help construction projects succeed by satisfying the criteria related to time, cost, quality, scope, and customer satisfaction. It is therefore one of the major factors influencing a project’s success. |
N | VR-embedded BIM immersive system for QS engineering education | 2018 | Wang et al. [23] | Qualitative research design | Utilizing VR walkthroughs to explore the virtual 3D building model might assist quantity surveying professionals and students in better comprehending architectural design, leading to more effective decision-making and accuracy in their job. |
O | Towards interconnected virtual reality: Opportunities, challenges and enablers | 2016 | Bastug et al. [56] | Qualitative research design | This article emphasizes the significance of VR technology as a revolutionary use of 5G (and beyond), utilizing the most recent advancements in computer vision, artificial intelligence, storage/memory, fog/edge computing, and other fields. |
P | Virtual reality as integration environments for facilities management | 2017 | Carreira et al. [44] | Qualitative research design | VR environments may boost efficiency in maintenance work. When compared to an old application interface, users without prior training show a high level of interest and performance. Eventually, reduced prices and higher quality will result from the possible reduction in user time and increase in involvement with a VR environment. |
Q | A multiuser shared virtual environment for facility management | 2016 | Shi et al. [15] | Experimental design | Through the development of a shared immersive experience, this study reveals that interpersonal connection in a VR environment is a crucial component of effective communication in facility management. |
R | Using augmented and virtual reality technology in the construction industry | 2016 | Behzadi [18] | Review of literature | VR could be used for scheduling, communication retrieval, labor hours, and safety. |
S | Virtual reality-based cloud BIM platform for integrated AEC projects | 2014 | Goulding et al. [58] | Qualitative research design | Trainees may assess how decisions they make might impact their firm in a risk-free environment using a cloud-based VR building site simulator. Analyzing problems that arise on the building site, such as design, process, logistics, and supply chain, is one of the things that fall under this umbrella. |
T | Virtual reality simulation for construction safety promotion | 2013 | Zhao et al. [46] | Review of literature | The suggested safety training program, which trains and tests personnel using VR simulation, may help to mitigate accidents and fatalities related to electrocution. VR simulations have been successfully employed in the construction sector for safety instruction. |
U | Application of ICT in the construction industry in Kampala | 2011 | Mutesi and Kyakula [50] | Quantitative research design | The most commonly used software are Microsoft Word, MS Excel, and PowerPoint. AutoCAD, Master Bill, and Microsoft Project are popular for architectural/engineering design and drawing, quantity surveying, and project planning, respectively. |
V | Adoption of virtual reality within construction processes: A factor analysis approach | 2006 | Fernandes et al. [55] | Quantitative research design | The study findings include a list of organizational, environmental, and project-related aspects that have to be taken into account. The champion inside a firm, top management support, internal demands, level of business competitiveness, coordination of organizational resources, and user engagement are important areas that demand special attention. |
W | The impact of ICT on professional practice in the Nigerian construction industry | 2006 | Oladapo [60] | Quantitative research design | The findings show that while the majority of basic architectural, engineering, and quantity surveying tasks, such as drawing, engineering design, and bills of quantities, have been digitized, data and document management are still frequently handled manually. |
Variable | Characteristics | Respondent No | Respondents (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Years of occupation | Less than 5 years | 36 | 43.4 |
6 to 10 years | 35 | 42.2 | |
11 to 15 years | 3 | 3.6 | |
16 to 20 years | 6 | 7.2 | |
Above 20 years | 3 | 3.6 | |
Profession | Architect | 33 | 39.8 |
Quantity surveyor | 23 | 27.7 | |
Builder | 15 | 18.1 | |
Engineer | 12 | 14.5 | |
Education | HND | 13 | 15.7 |
BSc/BTech | 38 | 45.8 | |
MSc/MTech | 31 | 37.3 | |
PhD | 1 | 1.2 |
S/N | Benefits of Virtual Reality Practices | f(Zi+) | f(Zi−) | f(Zi) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enhance communication and collaboration | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.170 | 1 |
2 | Enhance design clash detection | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.164 | 5 |
3 | Improve productivity | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.145 | 27 |
4 | Improve quality | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.153 | 24 |
5 | Reduce construction time | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.160 | 16 |
6 | Risk identification | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.166 | 2 |
7 | Digitalization | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.157 | 19 |
8 | Enable immersive visualization | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.164 | 6 |
9 | Enhance construction planning | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.162 | 11 |
10 | Enhance design efficiency | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.162 | 10 |
11 | Enhance fast project delivery | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.162 | 8 |
12 | Improve company image | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.145 | 28 |
13 | Help identify design flaws | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.147 | 26 |
14 | Enhance sustainable construction | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.161 | 13 |
15 | Enhance construction scheduling | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.160 | 17 |
16 | Reduce construction error | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.162 | 9 |
17 | Improve project performance | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.150 | 25 |
18 | Enable quality decision-making | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.153 | 23 |
19 | Safety planning | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.164 | 7 |
20 | Ease complex task | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.154 | 22 |
21 | Integrate workflow | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.161 | 12 |
22 | Reduce mistakes in documentation | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.160 | 15 |
23 | Enhance workers’ safety training | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.157 | 20 |
24 | Enhance maintenance | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.161 | 13 |
25 | Enhance accurate quantity take-off | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.158 | 18 |
26 | Help avoid defects | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.155 | 21 |
27 | Overcome the shortage of fit workforce | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.165 | 3 |
28 | Reduce construction cost | 0.167 | 0.833 | 0.164 | 4 |
Test | Value | |
---|---|---|
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy | 0.885 | |
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Approx. Chi-square | 1466.29 |
Df | 378 | |
Sig. | 0.000 |
Components | Initial Eigenvalues | Rotated Sums of Squared Loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 12.660 | 45.214 | 45.214 | 4.459 | 15.924 | 15.924 |
2 | 1.716 | 6.129 | 51.343 | 3.578 | 12.778 | 28.702 |
3 | 1.298 | 4.634 | 55.977 | 3.571 | 12.753 | 41.455 |
4 | 1.200 | 4.284 | 60.262 | 2.862 | 10.223 | 51.678 |
5 | 1.133 | 4.047 | 64.308 | 2.862 | 10.222 | 61.900 |
6 | 1.118 | 3.994 | 68.302 | 1.793 | 6.403 | 68.302 |
7 | 0.896 | 3.199 | 71.501 | |||
8 | 0.776 | 2.773 | 74.274 | |||
9 | 0.726 | 2.594 | 76.868 | |||
10 | 0.672 | 2.401 | 79.269 | |||
11 | 0.650 | 2.322 | 81.591 | |||
12 | 0.575 | 2.053 | 83.643 | |||
13 | 0.533 | 1.905 | 85.548 | |||
14 | 0.515 | 1.839 | 87.387 | |||
15 | 0.454 | 1.620 | 89.007 | |||
16 | 0.424 | 1.516 | 90.523 | |||
17 | 0.380 | 1.357 | 91.880 | |||
18 | 0.335 | 1.196 | 93.076 | |||
19 | 0.311 | 1.110 | 94.186 | |||
20 | 0.269 | 0.960 | 95.146 | |||
21 | 0.236 | 0.845 | 95.991 | |||
22 | 0.233 | 0.833 | 96.824 | |||
23 | 0.213 | 0.762 | 97.586 | |||
24 | 0.200 | 0.715 | 98.301 | |||
25 | 0.141 | 0.504 | 98.805 | |||
26 | 0.126 | 0.451 | 99.256 | |||
27 | 0.119 | 0.425 | 99.681 | |||
28 | 0.089 | 0.319 | 100.000 | |||
Extraction method: Principal component analysis |
S/N | Benefits | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enhance communication and collaboration | 0.604 | |||||
2 | Reduce construction time | 0.726 | |||||
3 | Reduce construction cost | 0.831 | |||||
4 | Enhance workers’ safety training | 0.423 | 0.647 | ||||
5 | Enhance construction scheduling | 0.559 | |||||
6 | Enhance design clash detection | 0.632 | |||||
7 | Safety planning | 0.578 | |||||
8 | Risk identification | 0.410 | 0.474 | ||||
9 | Enhance design efficiency | 0.579 | |||||
10 | Enhance construction planning | 0.658 | |||||
11 | Enable immersive visualization | 0.515 | |||||
12 | Overcome shortage of fit workforce | 0.811 | |||||
13 | Help avoid defects | 0.421 | 0.400 | ||||
14 | Help identify design flaws | 0.423 | 0.582 | ||||
15 | Improve project performance | 0.428 | |||||
16 | Improve company image | 0.770 | |||||
17 | Enhance accurate quantity take-off | 0.572 | |||||
18 | Enhance maintenance | 0.553 | 0.450 | ||||
19 | Digitalization | 0.738 | |||||
20 | Reduce mistakes in documentation | 0.694 | |||||
21 | Enhance fast project delivery | 0.559 | |||||
22 | Reduce construction error | 0.479 | |||||
23 | Ease complex task | 0.531 | 0.557 | ||||
24 | Enhance sustainable construction | 0.693 | |||||
25 | Enable quality decision-making | 0.798 | |||||
26 | Integrate workflow | 0.413 | 0.633 | ||||
27 | Improve productivity | 0.450 | 0.503 | ||||
28 | Improve quality | 0.648 |
Factor Components | Variables | Factor Loading |
---|---|---|
Pre-contract stage planning | Enhance communication and collaboration | 0.604 |
Safety planning | 0.578 | |
Enhance design efficiency | 0.579 | |
Overcome shortage of fit workforce | 0.811 | |
Help avoid defects | 0.421 | |
Improve project performance | 0.428 | |
Enhance accurate quantity take-off | 0.572 | |
Reduce mistakes in documentation | 0.694 | |
Post-contract stage planning | Enhance construction scheduling | 0.559 |
Enhance construction planning | 0.658 | |
Enhance fast project delivery | 0.559 | |
Reduce construction error | 0.479 | |
Enable quality decision-making | 0.798 | |
Quality control and sustainability | Enhance maintenance | 0.553 |
Ease complex task | 0.557 | |
Enable sustainable construction | 0.693 | |
Integrate workflow | 0.633 | |
Improve productivity | 0.503 | |
Improve quality | 0.648 | |
Design flexibility and reputation | Enhance design clash detection | 0.632 |
Enable immersive visualization | 0.515 | |
Help identify design flaws | 0.582 | |
Improve company image | 0.770 | |
Resource management | Reduce construction time | 0.726 |
Reduce construction cost | 0.831 | |
Enhance workers’ safety training | 0.647 | |
Risk management and digitalization | Risk identification | 0.474 |
Digitalization | 0.738 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oke, A.E.; Kineber, A.F.; Elshaboury, N.; Ekundayo, D.; Bello, S.A. Exploring the Benefits of Virtual Reality Adoption for Successful Construction in a Developing Economy. Buildings 2023, 13, 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071665
Oke AE, Kineber AF, Elshaboury N, Ekundayo D, Bello SA. Exploring the Benefits of Virtual Reality Adoption for Successful Construction in a Developing Economy. Buildings. 2023; 13(7):1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071665
Chicago/Turabian StyleOke, Ayodeji Emmanuel, Ahmed Farouk Kineber, Nehal Elshaboury, Damilola Ekundayo, and Samuel Ariyo Bello. 2023. "Exploring the Benefits of Virtual Reality Adoption for Successful Construction in a Developing Economy" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071665
APA StyleOke, A. E., Kineber, A. F., Elshaboury, N., Ekundayo, D., & Bello, S. A. (2023). Exploring the Benefits of Virtual Reality Adoption for Successful Construction in a Developing Economy. Buildings, 13(7), 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071665