You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Buildings
  • Article
  • Open Access

30 August 2023

Apartment Space Planning Directions for Infectious Disease Prevention and Management: Insights Based on Residents’ Experiences

and
1
Department of Housing and Interior Design, Chungbuk National University, Cheong-Ju 28644, Republic of Korea
2
Dodam Design & Research, #101-904, Hangangdaero 211, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04322, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue The Adaptability of Residential Planning and Design to World-Changing Events

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised people’s interest in pandemic-safe housing. This study aims to present insights into apartment housing space design to prevent and manage infectious diseases based on the actual living experiences of apartment residents. The relevant literature was reviewed, and overall satisfaction was assessed through a questionnaire targeting apartment residents in South Korea. Finally, using the photovoice method, residents’ space needs were identified. By applying a mixed-use methodology and identifying the needs of residents, the following two recommendations were derived: (1) a flexible space plan to support multifunctional use while securing work efficiency and privacy in the living room, bedroom, and space for hobbies/work/learning; (2) a facility for removing contaminants at the entrance with sufficient storage space. The residents emphasized the importance of non-structural changes to the space and the convenience of use to increase actual space utilization. When planning future pandemic-safe apartment housing spaces, it is important to consider structural aspects like functionality and facilities. Convenience of use and methods of supporting family members’ privacy should also be taken into account.

1. Introduction

COVID-19 has brought significant changes to people’s daily lives. Owing to the level of social separation it required, the pandemic has posed more social, mental, and psychological challenges to residents’ lives []. In particular, external activities such as working, studying, and entertainment have been added to the functional needs of residential buildings []. Social distancing and self-quarantine have allowed residents to rethink housing design and layout. Various functional, structural, and cultural aspects of housing significantly impact resident health through the prevention and management of infectious diseases [,]. Many patients infected with COVID-19 overwhelmed the capacity of hospitals and quarantine institutions; therefore, households operated their homes as places of self-isolation [].
Accordingly, efforts are being made to examine the layout and design of residential spaces from a new perspective and to suggest future design directions for a more effective response to the prevention and management of infectious diseases. Architecture has long been responsive to pandemics and health threats in innovative and adaptive ways []. Regarding the implications of stay-at-home requirements, many useful yet insufficient studies in multiple disciplines, including architectural design, environmental psychology, building science, engineering, urban planning, and healthcare, have been undertaken to determine the modifications necessary to make homes more adaptable to the new norm [,,,,,]. Scholars have introduced several factors that must be considered when designing the interiors of residential buildings. Tokazhanov et al. [] introduced the four categories of “health and safety”, “environmental resource consumption”, “comfort”, and “sustainable use of building services” as pandemic-resilient criteria.
Moreover, they specifically suggested various items such as natural light, temperature and humidity, greenery and gardens, activity/sports spaces, separate toilets for the infected, natural ventilation, space adjustability, personal space, acoustics, and urban farming, regarding the four main categories. AI-Qaisi [] introduced critical considerations for post-pandemic housing characteristics, such as low-population-density areas, flexibility, pliability and adaptation, and private and removable walls and screens, based on a literature review [,,]. Molaei et al. [] and Aydin and Sayar [] emphasized the importance of semi-open spaces for resting, leisure time, socializing with neighbors, and getting fresh air. Hajjar [] argued that securing natural elements such as garden space, sunlight, air, and a view of food production helps overcome the negative psychology of residents following the spread of infectious diseases. Millán-Jiménez et al. [] introduced findings that university students’ preference for open space and flexible space use increased in terms of health and comfort after lockdown.
Bettaieb and Alsabban [] introduced flexibility as an essential concept in housing after quarantine. They mentioned that the inside–outside relationship through windows and openings, various daily life activities, and changes in behavior in terms of privacy and comfort effected significant changes in spatial composition. To summarize the arguments in the literature, providing a flexible layout and multifunctional space using semi-open spaces and gardens to prevent and manage infectious diseases after COVID-19 effectively has become increasingly imperative.
However, this concept of flexibility requires a structurally removable wall and presents a problem regarding the accessibility of natural light, ventilation, and the outside view, according to each space division. Furthermore, although theoretical guidelines have been presented, their uniform application to individual residential spaces is limited because the lifestyles and needs of residents differ by country and region. Residential buildings play a significant role as spaces where residents mainly stay during self-isolation periods owing to infectious diseases []; therefore, it is critical to understand their lifestyles and needs and reflect them in the design of their space. Several authors have outlined the advantages of planning processes involving users [,,,,]. In particular, Correira and Willis [] explained that individuals have different characteristics, vulnerabilities, motivations, and ways and degrees of understanding. They asserted that people look at and respond to the present and future based on their past experiences when faced with a specific situation. For this reason, they emphasized the importance of understanding the individual’s experience to improve the management of future public health issues. In addition, Hartig and Lawrence [] argued that residence is a concept that includes people, place, activity, and time, and among them, how people act and behave in their residence has a great impact on their health. These articles suggest that understanding people’s behavior-based experiences can provide critical insights to improve the quality of residential spaces in terms of health.
Heydarian et al. [] stressed that it is critical to apply user-centered design to reflect end users’ needs, requirements, and preferences in building design. Nevertheless, many building industries fail to collect accurate information from users to better understand their needs and behaviors. Consequently, residents’ needs have not been detailed, and the same standards and principles have been continuously applied to building construction, ignoring regional, national, and cultural differences.
As special needs, such as the prevention and management of infectious diseases and social distancing, have emerged due to COVID-19, these characteristics should also be considered in planning residential spaces. To understand residents’ needs, collecting users’ opinions from various perspectives is necessary. Applying a mixed-use methodology is more effective than relying on one quantitative or qualitative research method, including surveys, interviews, observations, and site visits. Quantitative research effectively identifies the majority’s general opinions and preferences. In contrast, qualitative research helps draw in-depth conclusions about latent needs by observing and analyzing the behaviors of a few representative users from various angles. For example, Cuerdo-Vilches et al. [] described how the Spanish population perceived lockdown, how they related habitability and health aspects to housing, and how they have withstood the COVID-19 pandemic by using a survey and a photovoice method. They explained that it is useful to enrich the understanding of the topic in two aspects, quantitative and qualitative, through the mixed method.
Therefore, this study aims to identify the problems of the current residential spaces and suggest future space design directions by collecting and analyzing residents’ living experiences during the COVID-19 period, in order to prevent and manage infectious diseases effectively. The participants in this study were apartment residents living in a metropolitan area of South Korea. The study examined their living experiences when quarantine was strictly enforced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study is divided into three stages: literature review, survey, and photovoice. It uses mixed-use methods to identify residents’ vivid living experiences during the pandemic and offers practical design directions for pandemic-safe residential space plans based on user perspectives.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Review for Identifying Planning Guides to Prevent and Control Pandemic Disease in Residential Apartments

We examined the trends and guides discussed in the literature regarding space planning in residential apartments to prevent and manage infectious diseases. A literature review was conducted using the methodology introduced by Snyder []. The search strategy followed the PRISMA guidelines [] to select search terms and electronic databases, and we include an explanation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

2.1.1. Search Strategy

The three most used and valuable electronic databases were utilized to search academic papers comprehensively: Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus []. For search terms, “apartment housing”, “pandemic disease prevention and control”, “COVID-19 pandemic”, “space planning”, and “residential space” were chosen as keywords. A cross-search was conducted by expanding the scope to words with meanings similar to residential apartments. The languages included both English and Korean to avoid excluding Koreans’ residential experiences and needs.

2.1.2. Study Selection

From the literature search results of the three databases selected, a total of 3894 papers were searched. Among them, 251 papers were selected after reviewing the title and abstract of 2151 records, excluding redundant papers. The inclusion criteria included studies targeting apartment unit space and the exclusion criteria included studies dealing with the subjects of facilities, and architecture, building, and indoor environment requirements. As a result of assessing the relevance of the topic, 62 papers were selected, and their eligibility was closely evaluated through a full-text review. In this process, 3 papers were added from the reference list, and finally 24 papers were selected for analysis. The flow diagram of the literature review is shown in Figure 1. The final list of selected studies for review is provided in Appendix A.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature review.

2.2. Online Survey to Understand Residents’ Overall Residential Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted an online survey to understand the overall residential experience of Seoul residents. The survey was conducted from 28 June to 2 July 2022 and targeted 201 adults who experienced self-quarantine during the pandemic. The participants were recruited by snowball-targeting Seoul residents. After developing the questionnaire using Google Forms, the survey link was delivered to the participants through text messages. The initial questionnaire was revised and finalized after a pilot test with researchers and ten Seoul residents who had experienced self-isolation. The questionnaire comprised 23 items: 7 items for sociodemographic characteristics and residence type; 5 items for self-quarantine experience; 8 items for living experience during the pandemic; and 3 items for resident preference for pandemic-safe housing (Table 1 shows the items without sociodemographic characteristics). Two hundred thirty questionnaires were sent to the participants, and two hundred and one responses were received. For the data analysis, frequency analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25.0. The questionnaire obtained ethical approvement from the ethics committee of Chungbuk National University in June 2022.
Table 1. Questionnaire for the survey.

2.3. In-Depth Analysis of Apartment Residents’ Living Experiences during the Pandemic

At this stage, the photovoice technique was used to examine the living experiences of apartment residents more deeply. Photovoice is an effective method for direct interviews when dealing with sensitive or complex topics among participants by sharing one’s experiences with others through photography []. Additionally, this method can ensure active participation in the entire process, as it can be conducted online without meeting in person [].
In this study, to collect and analyze the residential experience during the pandemic more vividly through the voices and gazes of users, the photovoice method was divided into three stages: preliminary preparation, data collection, and data analysis.
First, photovoice participants were recruited in the preliminary preparation stage, and data collection and analysis methods were specified. In this study, families with elementary school children, who experienced the most significant changes in the behavior of family members owing to the social distancing policy during the pandemic, were selected as participants. The photovoice participants were housewives who interacted most actively with family members. The scope was limited to apartment residents in the metropolitan area (area less than 130 m2), where social solid distancing policies were implemented due to the high density of residents. The participants were recruited through a purposive sampling method to select those willing to actively share their personal residence experience with others and participate in the study. As the general number of photovoice participants comprises approximately 7–10 people [], we carefully selected seven participants after conducting brief interviews with those who expressed their willingness to participate and judging their suitability. To provide guidance and education on the photovoice method, orientation materials were prepared that introduced the purpose of the study. These materials also introduced how to take pictures and the research schedule. All the materials for photovoice obtained ethical approvement from the ethics committee of Chungbuk National University in June 2022. On 15 July 2022, we conducted a pre-education meeting for an hour on Zoom.
Second, residence experiences were collected in three stages in the data collection stage. In the first data collection stage, the participants were asked to freely take photos of spaces that revealed significant changes during the pandemic, spaces with negative living experiences, and their responses and improvements for approximately two weeks, during 15–29 July 2022. Subsequently, the participants selected approximately 20 images that were judged to adequately represent their living experience among the photos they had taken. Two representative photographs that best showed the problem were selected and submitted to the researcher with a brief description of the reason.
In the second stage of data collection, after reviewing the submitted photos, the researchers selected additional photos deemed meaningful and requested explanations from each participant. By synthesizing the primary and secondary data, images with similarities in space and function were categorized, and keywords were organized.
Moreover, a focus group interview with seven participants was conducted for approximately two hours using the classified image data (8 August 2022). When the images classified by the researcher were shown to the participants, they provided additional explanations about the photos they had taken. In-depth personal experiences were collected and shared by discussing aspects that resonated with the other participants’ photos, experiences, or related opinions. Five questions from the SHOWed technique were used to present participants’ opinions: (1) What do you see in this picture? (2) What is happening in this picture? (3) How does this picture relate to our lives? (4) Why do these problems, worries, and advantages exist? (5) What can we do to address the identified problems? [].
Third, in the data analysis step, the previously collected data were divided into meaningful sentence units, assigned code numbers, and further divided into meaning units with core meanings. The interview process was recorded with prior consent, and all collected data were transcribed and documented. Categorization analysis was conducted according to context by extracting keywords that were repeatedly mentioned or conveyed meaning from the recorded documents.

2.4. Insights into Residents’ Needs-Based Apartment Space Planning

Insights into residential apartment space plans were derived by synthesizing all the results obtained in the literature review, survey, and photovoice interviews. According to the guidelines identified in the literature review, the problems and experiences felt by residents were connected to the corresponding items to identify specific and practical needs. Based on the final insights, the specificity of the spatial planning needs of Korean apartment residents in response to infectious diseases is discussed.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Review for Identifying Planning Guides to Prevent and Control Pandemics in Residential Apartments

After identifying planning guides for effectively preventing and managing infectious diseases through reviews of 24 studies, 37 items were identified under five categories: general (G), entrance (EN), kitchen/dining room (KD), bedroom (BE), and balcony (BA). The general (G) category included 19 items: nine spaces (GS), two furniture (GF), three openings (GO), and five materials (GM). Two items were identified for the entrance (EN), and six items were collected for the kitchen/dining room (KD). Four items were found for the bedroom (BE), and six were identified for the balcony (BA) (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of the literature review: space planning guides for pandemic-safe residential housing (* indicates items mentioned more than five times).
In the general (G) category, the general space (GS) comprised variable walls, flexibility, access to outdoor space, biophilic, adjusting the opening and closing of spaces, access from the entrance to the bedroom to the living room, direct sunlight, and an improved mechanical ventilation rate. For general furniture (GF), fold/unfold flexibility/transformation and touchless motion sensor lights were emphasized. Regarding general openings (GO), ways to increase natural light and ventilation conditions were mentioned by planning multiple windows, large windows, ceiling windows, and folding doors. For general materials (GM), emphasis was placed on antibacterial materials, different finish glosses, and color control of the finish. In summary, the critical items for general apartment plans include spaces that change the structure of space and allow access to outdoor spaces; flexible and touchless furniture; different types of windows/doors for sunlight and ventilation; and variations in antibacterial and finishing materials.
In the entrance (EN), the installation of wash basins, air showers, dressing rooms, and foyer doors was emphasized to remove external contaminants effectively. For kitchens/dining rooms (KD), antibacterial materials, touchless appliances, adequate sunlight, and separate kitchens with multifunctional dining rooms were emphasized. For the bedroom (BE), individual bathroom plans, a separate main bedroom, and variable elements (including lighting) for multifunctional support were identified as essential guide items. The balcony (BA) highlighted enhanced communication with neighbors, multifunctional support, garden planning, and flexibility to adjust opening and closing.
Among these, five items mentioned more than five times in the literature were identified. The essential keywords can be summarized as flexible walls to adjust the opening/closing for multifunctional use (GS1, GS5, and GS6) and facility plans to remove contaminants at the entrance (EN1 and EN2). Removing contaminants at the entrance and flexible wall structures throughout the indoor space are critical for effectively managing and preventing infectious diseases.

3.2. Analysis of the Overall Residential Experiences of Apartment Housing Residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic

3.2.1. Residential Experiences of Apartment Housing Residents According to Self-Quarantine Experiences

We conducted an online survey to determine how apartment residents in Seoul felt about their living spaces while experiencing self-quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey respondents had experienced self-quarantine within their residence for as few as 4 days and as many as 14 days. They spent most of their time in bedrooms (59.7%) and living rooms (29.9%) during quarantine. The main activities performed during self-isolation were rest (40.9%), sleep (22.0%), hobbies (12.3%), telecommuting (11.4%), and attending remote classes (7.7%). This result shows that social activities conducted outside homes before the COVID-19 outbreak were brought into residential spaces, and various activities occurred in a complex manner.
Regarding their dissatisfaction with space during the period of self-quarantine, hobbies (32.5%), rest (17.9%), telecommuting (13.2%), sleep (10.3%), and remote classes (9.8%) were identified in the order for which space and furniture did not adequately support daily activities. The result implied a functional limitation in supporting activities that were previously conducted outside when performed inside the dwelling, since it was impossible to leave (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Summary of apartment residential experiences identified from the survey (1).

3.2.2. Residential Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic

As for the residents’ dissatisfaction regarding the structure of the residential space and the function of each room, it was emphasized that there was no independent space for performing a specific function or that there was a space limit in accommodating the changed function due to the narrow area of the existing space. Further, two bathrooms were necessary for separate toilet use when family members were infected with COVID-19.
The spaces that residents felt the greatest need to change in residential housing during the pandemic were living rooms (21.7%), kitchens (12.4%), master bedrooms (9.6%), children’s bedrooms (8.3%), bathrooms (8.0%), balconies (8.0%), entrances (7.6%), and study rooms or libraries (7.6%). Most of their time was spent in the bedroom and living room during self-quarantine. However, a change in the living room was found to be the most necessary because family members with different lifestyles gathered and spent time together in the living room.
When asked about their experience remodeling spaces or rearranging furniture as needed during the pandemic, living room changes (18.8%) showed the highest rate, followed by master bedrooms (10.2%), children’s bedrooms (7.5%), kitchens (7.1%), and study rooms (6.0%). This result indicated that a change in the function of the living room and a consequent change in space planning were top priorities (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Summary of apartment residential experiences identified from the survey (2).

3.2.3. Resident Preference for Pandemic-Safe Housing

The preferred place to store quarantine items was the foyer room closest to the entrance (74.1%). As a space improvement method to prevent and manage infectious diseases, when considering cost, time, and realistic aspects, rather than changing the structure of the space, a simple and convenient method through furniture rearrangement (29.4%) was preferred. Subsequently, methods such as changing the function of the space (21.4%) and partial remodeling (16.4%) were preferred. It was found that the method of slightly altering the space according to the needs of residents was the most applicable.
The most relevant considerations for the effective prevention and management of infectious diseases were ventilation (52.7%), independent personal space (17.4%), and a hygienic entrance (10.9%). The emphasis on ventilation and sanitary entrances is interpreted to be due to the high rates of viral transmission and infection through the air. In addition, because family members are absorbed in several different activities indoors, securing the efficiency and privacy of their work or actions is essential (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Summary of apartment residential experiences identified from the survey (3).

3.2.4. Summary of Apartment-Housing Residential Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic

In summary, the pandemic caused residents to primarily occupy their bedrooms and living rooms, where they spent the majority of their time engaging in restful activities such as sleeping (62.9%), as well as pursuing their hobbies, attending remote classes, and telecommuting (31.4%). Regarding dissatisfaction with the living experience, there was no independent space for a specific function and a narrow area to accommodate the changed function, and the need for two bathrooms appeared. This revealed the need to support functions newly absorbed into the indoor space due to the pandemic. The greatest need to change spaces appeared in the living room, bedroom, and kitchen—the place where the respondents spent the maximum amount of time showed a high need for improvement. Regarding actual space improvements, living rooms and bedrooms had the most scope, indicating that residents improved spaces out of necessity.
To prevent and manage infectious diseases effectively, priority was given to minimizing the spread of viruses through ventilation and sanitary entrances. Subsequently, securing an independent personal space was emphasized to increase the efficiency of the various activities of the family members without an invasion of privacy. This suggests that it is worthwhile to increase the functionality of a private bedroom to support multiple uses rather than a living room shared by family members.
In terms of space improvement methods, furniture rearrangement, space function changes, and partial remodeling were preferred. This means that the space should be repurposed in a way that can easily change its function and ensure flexible use through furniture rearrangements.
The above discussion summarizes the insights for space planning based on their living experience during the COVID-19 pandemic that apartment residents described in their responses, as explained through the following steps: (1) reinforcing ventilation and front-door hygiene functions to prevent/manage infectious diseases; (2) supporting multifunctional use in living rooms and bedrooms; (3) securing an independent personal space that can secure hobbies, telecommuting efficiency, and privacy; (4) relaxing centered on the bedroom and enhancement of sleep function.

3.3. In-Depth Analysis of Apartment-Housing Residential Experiences during the Pandemic

The following needs were identified for each space as a result of conducting photovoice interviews with seven participants (Table 3). At the entrance, insufficient storage space was emphasized as a negative living experience. In the living room, family members’ different activities and needs cause problems such as noise, distraction, and privacy issues, and the low efficiency of individual activities was highlighted as a primary problem. The dining room and kitchen are often used as temporary workspaces when they are not furnished separately. Complaints were made regarding the low work efficiency and concentration level owing to the frequent access of other family members to the workspace. The integrated bedroom, workspace, play, sleep, and study space resulted in poor concentration and poor-quality sleep. Regarding the balcony, it was pointed out that it is difficult to control the temperature according to the season and that the lack of facilities to support various activities reduces space utilization.
Table 3. Barriers to the residential experience and insights for improvement identified from the photovoice.

3.4. Insights into Residents’ Needs-Based Apartment Housing Space Planning

The following summarizes spatial planning insights from apartment residents’ living experiences obtained through a literature review, survey, and photovoice interviews (Table 4).
Table 4. Synthesized results of identifying user needs for a pandemic-safe housing space plan.
The literature review emphasized two aspects of planning a pandemic-safe residential space: (1) a flexible space plan using flexible walls, folding doors, or partitions, and (2) a facility for removing contaminants.
Regarding the flexible space plan, further considerations were derived for the living room, bedroom, hobby/telecommuting/learning space, and balcony. About the living room, support for multifunctional use was emphasized. Support for multifunctional use and reinforcement of sleeping and resting functions were highlighted in the bedroom. Securing separate, individual spaces was essential to ensure efficiency and privacy regarding hobbies, telecommuting, and learning spaces. Regarding the balcony, the need for indoor ventilation was highlighted. Regarding removing contaminants, the reinforcement of the hygiene function at the entrance was emphasized, indicating that the role of the entrance hall has become more crucial in blocking pollutants from the outside.
Additionally, residents’ practical and specific needs in each space were identified. To support multifunctional living rooms, residents preferred separated areas that could be opened or closed. It was also emphasized that multifunctional support facilities, such as lighting, windows, ventilation, air conditioning, and heating, which can be individually controlled, should be built together. Regarding bedrooms, the need to prepare isolation spaces has been highlighted by suggestions of securing flexible furniture, facility planning, and exclusive toilets to support multifunctional use. Separating telecommuting spaces from study/sleep/play areas was also necessary to facilitate sleeping/resting functions.
To secure a separate individual space for hobbies/telecommuting/learning, the separation of learning spaces for each child, ensuring independence of the home workspace, and providing storage space for related items were required. For the balcony, while the importance of ventilation was emphasized in the survey, the construction of related facilities to support leisure/hobby activities, seasonal temperature control, and securing storage space was mentioned in the photovoice. These results show that practical space utilization was considered a priority for residents. The need for storage space for sanitary products, delivery services, exercise equipment, and garbage disposal spaces was emphasized at the entrance.

4. Discussion

Considering the above results, space planning for preventing and managing infectious diseases among apartment residents in South Korea differs slightly from the results of previous studies. Previous studies [,,,,,,,,,] have emphasized the importance of removing contaminants by installing dry wash basins, air showers, inner gates, and entrance dressing rooms to strengthen sanitation. The opinions of apartment residents in this study indicate that securing efficient storage space for various items is more important than adding new facilities. The observed discrepancy suggests that the incorporation of supplementary amenities is practically challenging due to the financial strain and limited foyer space when implementing the optimal amenities in contemporary residential areas. Therefore, to narrow the gap between the ideal and reality, a plan to increase space utilization and share functions can be proposed by planning the circulation from the entrance to the living room through each room and linking each room, such as the entrance, laundry room, multipurpose room, and bathroom.
For living rooms, eliminating walls and flexibly adjusting space divisions using flexible walls, doors, and partitions have been emphasized in previous studies [,,,,,,,,]. Korean apartment residents emphasized that although separating areas is necessary, establishing flexible facilities that can be individually adjusted for each space should also be considered. The reason for this is that the residents are taking into account not just the physical structure, but also the practicality and usage of the space, showing that there is a limit to the utilization of space with simple spatial division and no consideration of facilities. Previous studies [,] have emphasized that bedrooms should be able to support various activities such as work, rest, and hobbies. Korean residents prefer separate workspaces and study spaces for work efficiency, noise blocking, and privacy. Notably, they did not want the sleep and rest functions of the bedroom to be replaced with other functions. However, securing an individual bathroom for each bedroom and using it as an isolation space when an infectious disease is confirmed is consistent with the results of previous studies [,]. Taking these results together, at least one bedroom needs to be placed as far from the living room as possible and it should have an individual bathroom with the function of an isolation space. Additionally, it is desirable to strengthen the functions of sleeping and resting by separating them from learning and working.
In previous studies, antibacterial materials, touchless systems [,], securing natural light [], and planning a dining room as a community space between the kitchen and living room [,] were emphasized to secure the independent functions of the kitchen. This aspect has the same context, as residents do not prefer the dining table as a homework and study space. Activities such as meal preparation, eating, studying, and working are unique functions that cannot be shared in one place; therefore, the study or workspace should be prepared as a separate space rather than using a dining table when considering noise, privacy, and work efficiency. In particular, because the kitchen is a place that all family members frequently access, functions that require concentration, such as studying or working, must be separated from it.
Regarding balconies, contents such as communication with neighbors, connection/expansion to external spaces, planting gardens, and vegetable garden utilization have been highlighted in previous studies [,]. However, for domestic residents, functions such as exercise, camping, and rest were emphasized, whereas functions such as plant cultivation, gardening, and kitchen gardens were relatively passive. Additionally, the need to build practical facilities to maximize space utilization, such as outlets, storage spaces, and temperature control functions to support multipurpose use was emphasized. Notably, while communication and networks with neighbors were considered necessary during the epidemic of infectious diseases abroad, in Korea, communication and contact with the outside were blocked entirely, and outside activities continued in a closed manner via the balcony.
In short, the guidelines of the reviewed literature (Table 2) on preventing and managing infectious diseases emphasized flexibility, communication with the outside world, and establishing facilities to block pollutants. Korean residents have expressed the importance of securing semi-enclosed flexibility within residential spaces, constructing facilities to maximize space utilization, and separating study and workspaces to increase efficiency. This difference demonstrates the practical perspective of domestic residents on maximizing multifunctionality and efficiency within a limited area. To effectively respond to future infectious diseases, the unit space of an apartment building should consider the following five critical directions: (1) enhancing sanitary function/space utilization by linking rooms around the entrance; (2) variable separation of living areas and securing flexibility of related facilities; (3) functional separation and independence of study, workspace, and kitchen; (4) considering the use of isolation space in the bedroom and strengthening the sleeping function; (5) provision of related practical facilities on the balcony to support leisure/hobby activities.
This study verified and presented the direction of spatial planning for preventing and managing infectious diseases as objectively as possible through a triangulation of literature reviews, quantitative surveys, and qualitative user interviews (photovoice). However, as the COVID-19 pandemic is a recent occurrence, it has a limitation in that the number of papers and reports considered is limited compared to other topics, and this study has focused on a specific period. Additionally, the photovoice interviews conducted to reflect the actual voice of the user in detail had seven participants. Although it is included in the range of adequate numbers required to identify needs, the additional needs of many users still need to be discovered. When domestic residents’ experience-based space planning needs are continuously met, a residential space design with high resident satisfaction is proposed. In addition, since the main purpose of this study was to understand practical experiences such as behavior, emotion, and interactions of residents, indoor environment requirements such as ventilation, windward flow, and fresh air were not directly addressed within the scope of this study. Experts were not included as participants because the focus of this study was to collect and analyze the vivid voices of urban residents. For this reason, rather than presenting a detailed and professional-level planning guideline, the results were limited to presenting critical insights that can be referred to in setting the criteria and direction of future residential space plans.

5. Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has become endemic; however, many researchers are still considering the potential occurrence and spread of different types of infectious diseases. Continuous study of space planning is essential for residential spaces to function as comfortable and safe shelters for humans, especially regarding the effective prevention and management of infectious diseases, in terms of public health. This is due to the fact that residents consider not only the physical structure but also the practicality and usage of the space. In terms of flexibility, Korean urban residents showed greater interest in efficient space utilization such as storage and access to outlets, switches, and windows when dividing the space. In addition, it was remarkable that spatial support for outdoor physical activities such as exercise and camping was more important than plants and gardening for Korean residents.
Understanding residents’ potential and practical needs is usually limited to presenting a theoretical guide or collecting quantitative opinions. Thus, we used a mixed-use method, as it is essential to understand user needs from multiple perspectives. This study is significant because it deeply grasps the living experiences of Korean residents during the COVID-19 period and derives practical design directions based on these experiences. The reason why we still need such research at the end of the pandemic is that public health issues including infectious diseases are critically related to human safety and must be jointly addressed worldwide. Recalling that the level of quarantine among countries was not the same during the COVID-19 pandemic, in order for the world to properly respond to infectious diseases in the future, it is critical to systematically understand the experiences we have gone through. The results of this study can be used as a framework for designing user research methods for user-centered residential space designs in the future. Finally, we believe that the insights for space planning presented in this study can systematically respond to future public health issues including infectious diseases, and serve as a guide to reflect the practical needs of urban residents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-K.K.; methodology, M.-K.K. and E.-J.K.; validation, M.-K.K. and E.-J.K.; formal analysis, E.-J.K.; investigation, E.-J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.-J.K.; writing—review and editing, M.-K.K.; supervision, M.-K.K.; project administration, M.-K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), grant number NRF-2021R1F1A1062673.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics committee of Chungbuk National University (CBNU-202206-HR-0138, 24 June 2022).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Seong-Ju Han, Ye-Bin Jeon, and Ji-Eun Park of Chungbuk National University for supporting data collection for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Reviewed literature.
Table A1. Reviewed literature.
Code.Authors (Year)Title
A-1AIA (2020 []Strategies for Safer Multifamily Housing
A-2AIA (2020) []Re-occupancy Assessment Tool V3.0
A-3Morgan, B. (2020) []4 Ways COVID Has Changed Home Design
A-4Peters, T., & Halleran, A (2020) []How Our Homes Impact Our Health: Using a COVID-19 Informed Approach to Examine Urban Apartment Housing
A-5Lee, H. K. (2021) []Hyundai Engineering Develops Specialized Flats Tailored to the Era of COVID-19
A-6Lee, S. W. (2021) []Synergy between ePyeonhansesang C2 House and 4Bay innovative flat.
A-7Massenburg, D. R. (2021) [] The house that quarantine built: Post-pandemic home design trends
A-8Scileppi, T. (2021) [] The Latest Home Design Trends of 2021 as told by Debra Design Group
A-9An, S. Y. (2022) [] Catch end-users who have become strict... Constructor plane specialization war.
A-10Spennemann, D.H. (2022) []Designing for COVID-2x: Reflecting on Future-Proofing
A-11Elrayies, G. M. (2022) []Prophylactic Architecture: Formulating the Concept of Pandemic-Resilient Home
A-12Lee, K. W. (2022) []LH, Proposes an Integrated Public Rental Housing Plan Tailored to the Life Cycle
A-13Glavan et al. (2022) []COVID-19 and City Space: Impact and Perspectives
A-14Tanamas et al. (2022) []Space Adaptations During Pandemic in Apartments
A-15Benbow, W. (2022) []COVID-19 in Long-Term Care: The Built Environment Impact on Infection Control
A-16Ching & Rani (2023) []The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Home Spatial Design
A-17Chen et al. (2023) []Effects of COVID-19 on Residential Planning and Design: A Scientometric Analysis
D-1Kim, M. S. (2021) [] A study on Architectural Approaches Corresponding to the Post-COVID Era
D-2Kim et al. (2022) []Analysis of Prior Research Studies to Develop Guidelines for Apartment Housing Planning in Response to Infectious Disease Disasters
D-3Shin et al. (2022) []The Architectural Planning Strategies for Multifamily Housing in a Post-Pandemic World
D-4Lee et al. (2022) []Changes in Housing Function and Space Preference in the Post COVID Era
D-5Jeon et al. (2022) []Reconstruction of Residential Space in the Post-COVID Era
D-6Kim et al. (2023) [] Analysis of User Experience Using Photo Voice Technique for Apartment Residential Space Planning in Responding to Infectious Diseases
D-7Park et al. (2023) []Analysis of Residents’ Interest Areas and Preference of Based on Eye Tracking for Apartment Planning in Response to Infectious Disease

References

  1. Saied, A.A.; Metwally, A.A.; Madkhali, N.A.B.; Haque, S.; Dhama, K. Egypt’s COVID-19 Recent Happenings and Perspectives: A Mini-Review. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 696082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tokazhanov, G.; Tleuken, A.; Guney, M.; Turkyilmaz, A.; Karaca, F. Assessment Method for New Sustainability Indicators Providing Pandemic Resilience for Residential Buildings. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bettaieb, D.M.; Alsabban, R. Emerging Living Styles Post-COVID-19: Housing Flexibility as a Fundamental Requirement for Apartments in Jeddah. Archnet-IJAR Int. J. Archit. Res. 2020, 15, 28–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Qaisi, M.O.M. An overview of post-pandemic housing: Through stay-at-home experience. Arab. J. Sci. Publ. 2021, 2663, 5798. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alhadedy, N.H.; Gabr, H.S. Home Design Features Post-COVID-19. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2022, 69, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aqarmap Guide. Available online: https://advice.aqarmap.com.eg/en/aqarmap-guide-to-the-most-important-real-estate-exhibitions-in-egypt-and-the-arab-world (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  7. Peters, T.; Halleran, A. How Our Homes Impact Our Health: Using a COVID-19 Informed Approach to Examine Urban Apartment Housing. Archnet-IJAR Int. J. Archit. Res. 2020, 15, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alhusban, A.A.; Alhusban, S.A.; Alhusban, M.A. How the COVID 19 Pandemic Would Change the Future of Architectural Design. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2022, 20, 339–357, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Erti Idawati, D. Sustainable Housing as an Approach to Adaptive Built Environment to COVID-19 (Case Study: Keudah Walk-up Flat in Banda Aceh). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 881, 012012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, J. The Impact of Pandemics on Future Residential Buildings in China; Rochester Institute of Technology: Rochester, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, S.; Su, Y. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for density: Evidence from the US housing market. Econ. Lett. 2021, 207, 110010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hipwood, T. Coronavirus: An Architect on How the Pandemic Could Change Our Homes Forever; The Conversation: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bahadursingh, N. Ways COVID-19 Will Change Architecture; Architizer: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Molaei, P.; Hashempour, P.; Tang, L.M. Semi-open spaces of apartments considering COVID-19 pandemic: General expectations of balcony design in the post-pandemic world. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2022, 18, 705–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aydin, D.; Sayar, G. Questioning the use of the balcony in apartments during the COVID-19 pandemic process. Archnet-IJAR Int. J. Archit. Research 2021, 15, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hajjar, R.M. Exploring a new housing design paradigm for post pandemic multi-story buildings in Lebanon. Archit. Plan. J. 2021, 27, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Millán-Jiménez, A.; Herrera-Limones, R.; López-Escamilla, Á.; López-Rubio, E.; Torres-García, M. Confinement, comfort and health: Analysis of the real influence of lockdown on university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Garber, M. The Atlantic. Homes Actually Need to be Practical Now: One of the Ironies of Social Distancing Is That It Can Put Privacy in Short Supply. Available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2020/03/finding-privacy-during-pandemic/608944/ (accessed on 19 August 2022).
  19. Lerup, L. Building the Unfinished: Architecture and Human Action; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  20. Albrecht, J. Towards a theory of participation in architecture—An examination of humanistic planning theories. J. Archit. Educ. 1988, 42, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tzortzopoulos, P.; Cooper, R.; Chan, P.; Kagioglou, M. Clients’ activities at the design front-end. Des. Stud. 2006, 27, 657–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nilsson, B.; Peterson, B.; Holden, G.; Eckert, C. Design Med Omtanke: Participation and sustainability in the design of public sector buildings. Des. Stud. 2011, 32, 235–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Eriksson, J.; Glad, W.; Johansson, M. User involvement in Swedish residential building projects: A stakeholder perspective. J. Hous. Built Environ. 2015, 30, 313–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Correia, T.; Willis, K. Applying critical realism to the COVID-19 pandemic to improve management of future public health crises. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2022, 37, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hartig, T.; Lawrence, R.J. Introduction: The residential context of health. J. Soc. Issues 2003, 59, 455–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bullinger, H.J.; Bauer, W.; Wenzel, G.; Blach, R. Towards user centred design (UCD) in architecture based on immersive virtual environments. Comput. Ind. 2010, 61, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cuerdo-Vilches, T.; Navas-Martín, M.Á.; Oteiza, I. A mixed approach on resilience of Spanish dwellings and households during COVID-19 lockdown. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Birkle, C.; Pendlebury, D.A.; Schnell, J.; Adams, J. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2020, 1, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Catalani, C.; Minkler, M. Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Educ. Behav. 2010, 37, 424–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Call-Cummings, M.; Hauber-Özer, M. Virtual photovoice: Methodological lessons and cautions. Qual. Rep. 2021, 26, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, C.C. Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. J. Women’s Health 1999, 8, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. The American Institute of Architects. AIA, Strategies for Safer Multifamily Housing. Available online: https://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/AIA_COVID_Building_type_Multifamily_Housing.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2023).
  35. The American Institute of Architects. AIA, Re-occupancy Assessment Tool V3.0. Available online: https://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/ReOccupancy_Assessment_Tool_v3.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2023).
  36. Construction Times. Hyundai Engineering, Hyundai Engineering Develops Specialized Flats Tailored to the Era of COVID-19. Available online: http://www.constimes.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=220285 (accessed on 21 July 2023).
  37. Lee, K.W. Kukto Ilbo. Available online: http://www.ikld.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=255077 (accessed on 17 August 2022).
  38. Tanamas, K.; Widayati, N.; Lianto, F. Space Adaptations During Pandemic in Apartments. In Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021), Jakarta, Indonesia, 25 August 2021; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 276–282. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chen, Q.; Sun, Z.; Li, W. Effects of COVID-19 on Residential Planning and Design: A Scientometric Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, M.S. A Study on Architectural Approaches Corresponding to the Post-COVID Era—Proposal of Prevention of Infectious Disease Through Environmental Design. J. Archit. Inst. Korea 2021, 37, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, D.Y.; Kwon, O.J.; Kim, J.Y. Changes in Housing Function and Space Preference in the Post COVID Era—Plan Proposal for the Echo Boomer Generation. J. Korean Hous. Assoc. 2022, 33, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jeon, K.S.; Lee, M.S.; Choi, K.B. Reconstruction of Residential Space in the Post-COVID era. J. Korean Inst. Cult. Archit. 2022, 78, 94–101. [Google Scholar]
  43. Park, E.C.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, M.K. Analysis of Residents’ Interest Areas and Preference of based on Eye Tracking for Apartment Planning in Response to Infectious Disease. J. Korean Inst. Inter. Des. 2023, 32, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Morgan, B.; Forbes. 4 Ways COVID Has Changed Home Design. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2020/09/28/4-ways-covid-has-changed-home-design/?sh=4713b51568433 (accessed on 21 July 2023).
  45. Global Economy Newspaper. Synergy between ePyeonhansesang C2 House and 4Bay Innovative Flat. Available online: https://www.getnews.co.kr/ (accessed on 21 July 2023).
  46. WRAL. The House That Quarantine Built: Post-Pandemic Home Design Trends. Available online: https://www.wral.com/the-housethat-quarantine-built-post-pandemic-home-designtrends/19621460/ (accessed on 21 July 2023).
  47. 2021—LI Press. Available online: https://www.longislandpress.com/2021/ (accessed on 7 September 2022).
  48. An, S.Y. Aju Business Daily. Available online: https://www.ajunews.com/view/2021 (accessed on 19 August 2022).
  49. Spennemann, D.H.R. Designing for COVID-2x: Reflecting on Future-Proofing Human Habitation for the Inevitable next Pandemic. Buildings 2022, 12, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Elrayies, G.M. Prophylactic Architecture: Formulating the Concept of Pandemic-Resilient Homes. Buildings 2022, 12, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lekić Glavan, O.; Nikolić, N.; Folić, B.; Vitošević, B.; Mitrović, A.; Kosanović, S. COVID-19 and City Space: Impact and Perspectives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Benbow, W. COVID-19 in Long-Term Care: The Built Environment Impact on Infection Control. Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 2022, 15, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ching, L.S.; Rani, M.F.A. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on home spatial design. Malays. J. Sustain. Environ. 2023, 10, 207–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, M.K.; Park, E.C.; Kim, E.J. Analysis of prior research studies to develop guidelines for apartment housing planning in response to infectious disease disasters. Korean J. Hum. Ecol. 2022, 31, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shin, D.S.; Lee, M.S.; Yoo, Y.H. The Architectural Planning Strategies for Multifamily Housing in a Post-Pandemic World. J. Archit. Inst. Korea 2022, 38, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim, M.K.; Han, S.J.; Kim, E.J. Analysis of User Experience Using Photo Voice Techniques for Apartment Residential Space Planning in Responding to Infectious Diseases. J. Korean Inst. Inter. Des. 2023, 32, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.