1. Introduction
The environmental impact of traditional Portland cement (PC) production has driven research into suitable alternatives. According to Li et al. [
1], PC production contributes approximately 8% of annual CO
2 emissions, contributing to greenhouse gas effects and global warming. Li et al. [
2] added that 12–15% of global industrial energy is consumed in cement production, leading to high costs of the product. Cement production involves environmentally harmful practices, such as the extraction of limestone [
3], so the increasing cement demand worsens environmental pollution [
1]. Consequently, there is a growing need for eco-friendly cement materials to support construction while reducing environmental impact. In addition, the gradually increasing costs of carbon dioxide emission allowance pose another factor that creates pressure to search for a material alternative. Carbon tax and carbon emission trading system incentives are considered tools for reducing carbon emissions in the building industry.
To address these issues, researchers have explored cementless binders like alkali activation of industrial by-products and waste materials, offering a promising alternative to traditional cement [
2,
4]. Mostly, silica-alumina rich industrial by-products such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), silica fume, fly ash (FA), red mud, agricultural waste ashes, e.g., rice husk ash, clay minerals like kaolin, soil, and sediments, can be used to produce cementitious materials (AAMs) through an alkali-activation process [
5].
The chemical composition of these materials, particularly the silica (SiO
2) and alumina (Al
2O
3) content, directly influences the properties of the resulting AAMs. The materials form a three-dimensional aluminosilicate binder gel in a geopolymerization reaction with an alkali activator to produce AAM material with physical properties similar to those of Portland cement [
6,
7]. High aluminosilicate content generally leads to better strength and durability due to the formation of more stable AAM gels by the dissolution of the material in an alkali activator to form monomers of silicate [SiO
4]
4− and aluminate [AlO
4]
5− and polymerization of the dissolved species to form oligomers, which further polymerize to form amorphous gels, “a three-dimensional network of Si–O–Al bonds”. The mechanical properties, such as strength and stiffness, as well as chemical resistance and durability of the resulting AAMs, are influenced by the degree of polymerization and cross-linking, type and amount of the alkali activator used, and the size and shape of the precursor [
8,
9].
In addition, alkaline activation may also lead to the formation of crystalline phases, such as zeolites and calcium silicates, depending on the composition of the precursors and the processing conditions [
10]. These crystalline phases can contribute to the material’s properties by enhancing its thermal stability, modifying its pore structure, and providing additional mechanical reinforcement. Excessive crystallization may lead to reduced mechanical properties or undesired changes in material behavior, highlighting the importance of controlling the phase composition during the activation process [
11,
12].
However, the feasibility of alkali-activated materials (AAMs) lies significantly in the local availability of raw materials [
13]. Many of the raw materials used to produce AAMs are also sought after for blending with ordinary Portland cement (OPC). This competition for raw materials is a crucial consideration in AAMs’ supply chains. For AAMs to be advocated as an environmentally friendly option, it is imperative to minimize the transport of bulk materials, which can increase production costs and, consequently, increase the carbon emissions footprint [
5,
14]. A key role in sustainable building material design is played by the valorization of locally available by-products into value-added materials. While the majority of the published works are conducted on conventional precursors (GGBS, FA), which face limited availability, the primary aim of this study lied in the utilization of abundant material.
Water sediments (WSs), a kaolinitic clayey characterized by high amounts of SiO
2, Al
2O
3, and CaO, possess pozzolanic properties, making them potentially suitable for alkaline activation. WS composition relies on the rock from which sediments originated and subsequent reactions with fluids that convert these source rocks into solutes and minerals. It is of particular importance to distinguish the high-organic content sediments with a significant portion of phosphorus and nitrogen, sandy sediments, and fine-grain sediments with clay and silt content that require further treatment [
15]. Unlike traditional precursors such as GGBS or FA, WS represents material that is abundant and produced locally with regard to the number of reservoirs or other water bodies. For example, Beddaa et al. [
16] estimated yearly global dredging activities to yield about 600 million m
3 of WS, with Europe accounting for about 300 million tons. Therefore, repurposing this volume into AAM production may reduce demand for traditional cement and, at the same time, enhance safe sediment disposal. Hence, the utilization of sediment in AAMs will signify a substantial move toward the principles of circular economy, promoting sustainability and efficient resource management [
8,
17].
Notwithstanding, only a few studies have explored the activation of WS through alkali activation. For instance, Fort et al. [
18] investigated alkali-activated WS calcinated at 900 °C by employing a mixture of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and potassium silicate solution (K
2SiO
3) as an activator. The compressive strength across the samples ranged from 14.59 MPa to 37.09 MPa, with the enhanced strength attributed to effective aluminosilicate dissolution during the alkali activation. WS with lower Si/Al ratios exhibited higher porosity in the 0.01–0.1 µm range, with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) results indicating the formation of denser structures for sediments with fine particles [
19]. In another study, Jiang et al. [
20] prepared artificial stone through the alkali activation of yellow river silt using Ca (OH)
2 as an activator. The compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of the stone were determined under various conditions, such as alkali dosages, fly ash contents, and curing ages. Results indicate that the compressive strengths of heat-treated specimens increased by 60% with an increase in curing age. Furthermore, the addition of 10% fly ash significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of the mixture, with compressive strengths and splitting tensile strengths of specimens, with fly ash being 2 to 3 times greater than those without. The highest compressive strength of heat-treated specimens was recorded as 16.6 MPa at 90 days of curing with a Ca(OH)
2 dosage of 15%, while the highest splitting tensile strength was 1.4 MPa with a Ca(OH)
2 dosage of 10%. Zibret et al. [
21] analyzed clay-rich river WS as potential precursors for AAMs, calcinating two samples, fresh sediment and old sediment, to compare the material reactivity. As found, only limited mechanical performance was achieved, and FA and slag need to be applied to increase the compressive strength up to 32.2 and 29.3 MPa, respectively. Similarly, Komnitsas [
22] conducted experimental studies on two Greek marine WS from Souda and Patras. The research concluded that Souda WS exhibited limited alkali activation due to their low SiO
2 content, resulting in compressive strength reaching only 5 MPa. Conversely, Patras WS, containing higher amounts of amorphous silica compounds, showed better mechanical performance, with compressive strengths increasing from 8.5 to 19 MPa as KOH molarity increased from 2 M to 4 M. The analogy within the design stage can be recognized in the use of crushed recycled glass for alkali-activated fly ash based geopolymer concrete and prediction of its capacity [
23].
Based on the above-mentioned findings, utilizing sediment may offer a promising pathway for new construction material while, at the same time, promoting resource conservation, environmental protection, and sustainable treatment of sediment [
24]. Instead of viewing sediments as waste to be discarded, it is important to prioritize their valorization into AAMs, thereby converting sediment into valuable construction material [
25,
26]. As evident from the literature, the transformation of WS into a building material with sufficient strength is still an unsolved task, especially due to the limited amorphous content. Despite the advances in the understanding of the alkaline activation process for the conventional precursors, the utilization of WS in a similar way struggles with limited mechanical performance and no clear design guidelines. This study focuses on the design of freshwater sediment-based AAMs and the characterization of the material properties. For this purpose, the different grades of WS are collected and consequently used for the design of paste samples. On the basis of analysis of mineralogical and chemical composition, supplemented by the determination of mechanical parameters and the development of reaction heat evolution, the most suitable WS are further utilized for mortar design. The accessed results provide advances in the field of valorization of WS based on the characterization of the microstructural and mechanical performance.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
The freshwater sediments used for alkali activation were collected from eight different water dams in the Czech Republic and from S1 to S8 accordingly. Before the characterization, the sediments were naturally pre-dried to remove the excessive water content and consequently dried in the electric oven to achieve steady-state mass. The calcination of the WS is important for AAM production, as it transforms crystalline phases into amorphous phases, making enough aluminosilicate available for the polymerization reaction. The dehydroxylation carried out at calcination temperatures of 900 °C improves the reactivity, mechanical properties, and overall performance of the formed AAMs by leaching the available aluminosilicate in the alkaline solution. This process consequently forms an AAM network with a denser and more compact microstructure.
The XRF machine (ARL QUANT’X Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) determined the elemental composition of the collected samples with an adjustable X-ray beam size of 1 to 15 mm. The oven-dried samples were calcined at 900 °C (based on preliminary testing) in a muffle furnace (Classic Clare 4.0) at a heating rate of 5 °C/min for 3 h (peak temperature). The sediment samples were ground to a fine powder using a ball mill machine for 1 h and sieved with a 0.125 mm mesh to achieve a larger surface area. The phase compositing of the processed material was evaluated using X-ray powder diffractometer AERIS (XRD).
The chemical composition of the dry WS samples was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, as shown in
Figure 1. The analysis revealed that the samples were rich in silica (SiO
2) and alumina (Al
2O
3), with combined contents of 81 to 86 wt.%. Also, there was a significant amount of iron oxide (4 to 9 wt.%) and a small quantity of other elements. The materials exhibited low levels of heavy metals, below the threshold value at which they are considered toxic. In comparison to the EU fly ash standards in terms of heavy metals, the revealed concentration was below despite the slightly increased concentrations of Mn, Zr, and Ba in the materials [
27,
28]. Oxide composition corresponds well to the rice husk ash studied by Alvarado et al. [
29]; here, only variations in Al
2O
3 can be recognized. The analogy with the fly ash (Class-F) is more complicated, as a significantly lower share of the amorphous reactive phase can be recognized. This finding makes the polycondensation process more complicated, and less favorable results can be expected without additional treatment.
Mineralogical Composition (XRD)
The mineralogical phases present in the WS include kaolinite (Al
2Si
2O
5(OH)
4), chlorite (ClO
−2), albite (NaAlSi
3O
8), quartz (SiO
2), microcline (KAlSi
3O
8), and illite (K, H
3O) (Al, Mg, Fe)
2(Si, Al)
4O
10[(OH)
2·(H
2O)] were determined using XRD, as shown in
Table 1.
The mineralogical compositions are generally similar, but some differences are notable. All samples contain an average amount of clay minerals in varying proportions (chlorite, illite, kaolinite), feldspar (albite, plagioclase, microcline), tectosilicates such as quartz, and small amounts of hornblende and hillebrandite (hydrated calcium silicate Ca2(SiO3)(OH)2).
Notably, samples S6, S7, and S8 exhibit significant amounts of kaolinite, while samples S1 and S2 show a high content of illite, indicating their potential for geopolymerization reactions after thermal treatment [
30]. Negligible amounts of microclines and varying amounts of amorphous albite, which can be made reactive by calcination, were also detected.
2.2. Sample Preparations
First, the paste samples were prepared to identify the most suitable materials for detailed investigation. To synthesize the AAMs, the calcinated WS sample, water, and an alkali activator, potassium silicate, were blended into a homogeneous mixture using a FORM +TEST Prufsysteme standard cement/mortar mixer for 4 min in a liquid/solid ratio of 0.4 according to CSN EN 196 [
31]. Designed paste samples were denoted S1-P to S8-P according to the type of raw sediment used (S1–S8). The mixture was then poured into a 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm steel mold. After vibrating the mold on a vibration table to remove air bubbles, it was covered with polyethylene film and cured at ambient temperature for 2 days. The samples were then de-molded, wrapped in polyethylene film, and left in a natural environment for an additional 26 days. Subsequently, they were oven-cured to a constant weight at 80 °C for 2 days. The preparation process is depicted in
Figure 2. After the first round of mixing performed on the pasta samples, the most promising materials were selected based on the reactivity parameters, and the mortars (S1-M, S4-M, S7-M) were designed according to the ratios presented in
Table 2.
2.3. AAM Characterization
The Bettersizer S3 Plus laser diffraction particle size and shape analyzer, equipped with 0.5× and 10× image magnification, was used to determine the particle size distribution of the FSW. The particle size distribution was determined by dry sieving, according to the European standard EN 933-1 [
28]. During measurement, particles dispersed in the fluid were pumped through two sample cells. In the first cell, short-wave laser light (532 nm) illuminates the particles, causing them to scatter. The optical signals were detected at an angle range of 0.02° to 165°. In the second sample cell, cameras captured images of the particles to provide shape information within the range of 2 µm to 3500 µm. The particle size distribution (PSD) of WS indicates average size distributions ranging from 7.198 µm to 50.78 µm at D50.
The chemical analysis of the raw WS was analyzed at a time range of 10 to 60 s per element. The resulting WS composes a good amount of silica-alumina, which indicates its suitability for AAM production.
The mineralogy was characterized using a AERIS XRD (Malvern PANalytical, Malvern, UK) with Cu-Kα wavelength radiation with a 600 W X-ray generation tube set at 30 kV. The qualitative and quantitative phases, as well as the amorphous content in the samples, were determined. The onboard RoboRiet 4.9 software was used for automated analysis, and the quantification of different phases was determined by the Rietveld method. For this purpose, the powder sample was mounted on an aluminum slide and scanned from 5° to 45° 2θ with a scan rate of 0.1 steps per minute.
A TAM Air eight-channel calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) was employed for recording the reaction heat evolution during the alkaline reaction. Each calorimetric channel is a twin type, consisting of a reference chamber and a sample. The ampoules of the calorimeter have a volume of 20 mL operated at the temperature range from 5 to 90 °C with a detection limit of about 4 W.
Physical properties of the formulated AAM composites such as the bulk density, matrix density, and total open porosity were analyzed. The bulk density was obtained by determining the dimensions and weight of the samples, the matrix density was calculated using Pycnomatic ATC helium pycnometer manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific, and the total open porosity was calculated from the bulk and matrix density values.
A VEB WPM Leipzig mechanical device with a loading capacity of 3000 kN was used to examine the mechanical performance of the produced AAMs following the European standard EN 12390-2 guideline [
32]. The flexural strength was determined by a three-point bending test on bar samples with dimensions of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm (three specimens), following the EN 12390-5 procedure [
33]. Compressive strength was determined using the broken piece (six specimens) from the flexural strength test, following the EN 12390-3 procedure [
34].
Pore distribution analyses were carried out using Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP), Pascal 140 and Pascal 440 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Prague, Czech Republic), with high pressurization speed, pressure capacity up to 400 MPa, and pore size range of 3 nm to 100 µm. During the evaluation, gases in the AAMs pores were removed at low pressure. The pores were subsequently filled with mercury at a contact angle of 140°.
The microstructure of the AAMs was analyzed using a JSM 6510 LV-Jeol scanning electron microscope, with a magnification capacity of 5 to 300,000 times. The samples were examined at magnifications between 250× and 2000×, using a 5 kV image with a spot size of 1.07 mm to 1.34 µm on the x-axis and 300 µm to 30 µm on the y-axis.
Sorptivity (S) is a term used for water ingress into pores of concrete; it is essentially a determination of the rate of water absorption due to capillary suction in a porous solid over a period of time. The sorptivity study was carried out by coating cut AAM cubes of 40 × 40 × 40 mm dimensions with epoxy resin on four sides while exposing one face of the cube to water for unidirectional water absorption. Before coating, the cubes were dried in an oven at 80 °C for 2 days. The dried samples were weighed to determine the initial mass before they were exposed to 10 mm water height at immersion times of 30, 60, and 120 s. The difference between the initial and final weight was compared to determine the water absorption. Using this experiment, the water absorption of the materials was characterized by sorptivity (S) and water absorption coefficient.
Sorptivity (
S) is derived using Equation (1).
where
is the square root of time (s).
I is the cumulative water absorption (mm), which is determined from Equation (2).
where Δ
m is the increase in weight of the sample due to water absorption (g),
A is the cross-sectional surface area of the sample (mm
2), and
is the density of water (g/mm
3).
When “
I” is plotted against the square root of time (
), data are represented by a straight line, and water sorptivity
in
can be determined as the slope of the line [
35].