Next Article in Journal
Residential Care Facilities for Users with Alzheimer’s Disease: Characterisation of Their Architectural Typology
Previous Article in Journal
BIM and IFC Data Readiness for AI Integration in the Construction Industry: A Review Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vision-Based Construction Safety Monitoring Utilizing Temporal Analysis to Reduce False Alarms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents

1
Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3306; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103306
Submission received: 23 September 2024 / Revised: 11 October 2024 / Accepted: 17 October 2024 / Published: 19 October 2024

Abstract

Construction accidents pose significant risks to workers and the public, affecting industry productivity and reputation. While several reviews have discussed risk assessment methods, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, and real-time decision support systems have created a need for an updated synthesis of the quantitative methodologies applied in construction safety. This study systematically reviews the literature from the past decade, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough search identified studies utilizing statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, simulation, and artificial intelligence (AI). These methods were categorized and analyzed based on their effectiveness and limitations. Statistical approaches, such as correlation analysis, examined relationships between variables, while mathematical models, like factor analysis, quantified risk factors. Simulation methods, such as Monte Carlo simulations, explored risk dynamics and AI techniques, including machine learning, enhanced predictive modeling, and decision making in construction safety. This review highlighted the strengths of handling large datasets and improving accuracy, but also noted challenges like data quality and methodological limitations. Future research directions are suggested to address these gaps. This study contributes to construction safety management by offering an overview of best practices and opportunities for advancing quantitative risk assessment methodologies.
Keywords: construction safety; accident risk analysis; quantitative methods; risk assessment; systematic review; artificial intelligence construction safety; accident risk analysis; quantitative methods; risk assessment; systematic review; artificial intelligence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumi, L.; Jeong, J.; Jeong, J. Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents. Buildings 2024, 14, 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103306

AMA Style

Kumi L, Jeong J, Jeong J. Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents. Buildings. 2024; 14(10):3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumi, Louis, Jaewook Jeong, and Jaemin Jeong. 2024. "Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents" Buildings 14, no. 10: 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103306

APA Style

Kumi, L., Jeong, J., & Jeong, J. (2024). Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents. Buildings, 14(10), 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop