Next Article in Journal
Controlling Seepage Flow Beneath Hydraulic Structures: Effects of Floor Openings and Sheet Pile Wall Cracks
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Use of Hydraulic Modified Sulfur Powder in Concrete Pavements: Laboratory Testing and Field Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Full-Scale Test on Enhancing the Thermal Performance of a Concrete Slab Embedded with a MWCNT Heating Module Exposed to an Outdoor Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Bond Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of the Interface between Engineered Cementitious Composites and Shaped Steel

1
School of Civil Engineering, Xijing University, Xi’an 710123, China
2
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Safety and Durability of Concrete Structures, Xi’an 710123, China
3
School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2024, 14(7), 2233; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072233 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 June 2024 / Revised: 10 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024

Abstract

Due to their excellent ductility and crack-control ability, engineered cementitious composites (ECCs) combined with shaped steel can produce steel-reinforced engineering cementitious composite (SRECC) structures which exhibit significant advantages in prefabricated buildings. The interface bond behavior is the base for the cooperative working performance of the shaped steel and ECC. This study included push-out tests of one ordinary concrete control specimen and ten ECC specimens. The various parameters were the ECC compressive strength, fiber volume content, cover thickness, and the embedded length of shaped steel. The bond stress–slip curves at the loading and free end were obtained, and the effects of various parameters on the characteristic points of curves were analyzed. The results indicated that the ordinary concrete specimen failed in brittle splitting, with the cracks completely penetrating the surface of the specimen. Due to the fiber-bridging effect in ECCs effectively preventing the development and extension of cracks, the shaped steel at the free end was obviously pushed out, and the surrounding matrix maintained good integrity after testing finished. For ECC specimens, bond or splitting-bond failure occurred, exhibiting outstanding ductility. Compared with the ordinary concrete specimen, the standard ultimate and residual bond strength of ECC specimens improved by 37.9% and 27.4%, respectively. Besides the increase in ECC compressive strength, the fiber volume content and cover thickness had a significant positive influence on the ultimate and residual bond strength, whereas the effect of the embedded length was the opposite. Finally, the calculation equations of characteristic bond strength were proposed, and the calculated values matched well with the experimental values.
Keywords: bond strength; engineered cementitious composites; failure mechanism; shaped steel; push-out test bond strength; engineered cementitious composites; failure mechanism; shaped steel; push-out test

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pan, J.; Huang, Z.; Lu, T.; Deng, M. Bond Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of the Interface between Engineered Cementitious Composites and Shaped Steel. Buildings 2024, 14, 2233. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072233

AMA Style

Pan J, Huang Z, Lu T, Deng M. Bond Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of the Interface between Engineered Cementitious Composites and Shaped Steel. Buildings. 2024; 14(7):2233. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pan, Jiaojiao, Zhenbin Huang, Tingting Lu, and Mingke Deng. 2024. "Bond Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of the Interface between Engineered Cementitious Composites and Shaped Steel" Buildings 14, no. 7: 2233. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072233

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop