From ‘Objects’ to ‘Sustainable Development’: The Evolution of Architectural Heritage Conservation in Theory and Practice
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Results
3.1. The Formation of Conservation Theory and Its Contribution to the Venice Charter
- ▪
- Any new work should be easily recognizable at a close distance but, at the same time, it should not offend the unity that is being restored.
- ▪
- The part of the material that directly results in the formation of the aesthetic images is irreplaceable.
- ▪
- Any restoration should be made so that it will not be an obstacle for necessary future interventions; indeed, these should be facilitated.
- ▪
- The unacceptability of creative conservation—conservation should not be an imitation of the original design.
- ▪
- The imperative of preservation of the patina—conservation should not erase the layer of passing time.
- ▪
- The uniqueness of an individual conservation case—conservation should be executed based on the specific needs and conditions of the object.
3.2. The Venice Charter
3.3. Reinterpretations at the Institutional Level: After the Venice Charter 1964
4. Discussion: Forthcoming Trends and Methodologies in Conservation
5. Conclusions: The Future of Heritage Conservation
- ▪
- the protection of objective values, intrinsic values embedded within the heritage materials,
- ▪
- to defining and retaining relative values, or socially constructed qualities,
- ▪
- recently to perceiving heritage as a source of Indigenous knowledge that can contribute to climate science and to mitigating and adapting to the risks of climate change, and
- ▪
- the demand to achieve environmental sustainability highlights the importance of the ideas and practices of Circular Economy and Resource Efficiency—minimizing energy and resource consumption and making the most use of what already exists highly increases the potential of existing building stock for reducing the environmental impact of/from buildings.
5.1. Limitation and Future Research Direction
5.2. Definition of Some Terminologies
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ashworth, G. Preservation, Conservation and Heritage: Approaches to the Past in the Present through the Built Environment. Asian Anthropol. 2011, 10, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, A. The Architecture of the City; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Cunnington, P. Change of Use: The Conversion of Old Buildings; Alphabooks: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Plevoets, B.; Van Cleempoel, K. Adaptive Reuse as a Strategy towards Conservation of Cultural Heritage: A survey of 19th and 20th Century Theories. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2012, 118, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sørensen, M.L.S.; Carman, J. Heritage Studies: Methods and Approaches; Routledge: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viñas, S.M. Contemporary Theory of Conservation; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Birabi, A.K. International Urban Conservation Charters: Catalytic or Passive Tools of Urban Conservation Practices among Developing Countries? City Time 2007, 3, 39–53. [Google Scholar]
- Sully, D. Conservation Theory and Practice. The International Handbooks of Museum Studies; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, R. Heritage Critical Appraches; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kwanda, T. Tradition of Conservation: Redefining Authenticity in Javanese Architectural Conservation. In Proceedings of the International Confrence on Heritage and Sustainable Development, Évora, Portugal, 22–26 June 2010; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Bye, M. Histories of Architectural Conservation: Five Case Studies on the Treatment of Norwegian Vernacular Heritage Buildings circa 1920–1980. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Logan, W.; Kockel, U.; Nic Craith, M. The New Heritage Studies: Origins and Evolution, Problems and Prospects. In A Companion to Heritage Studies; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Teutonico, J.M. The ICCROM Architectural Conservation Course 1982–92: History, Evolution, Impact. Mus. Int. 2009, 61, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokilehto, J. International Charters on Urban Conservation: Some Thoughts on the Principles Expressed in Current International Doctrine. City Time 2007, 3, 23–42. [Google Scholar]
- Araoz, G.F. Preserving Heritage Places under a New Paradigm. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 1, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orbaşli, A. Conservation Theory in the Twenty-First Century: Slow Evolution or a Paradigm Shift? J. Archit. Conserv. 2017, 23, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICCROM. People-Centred Approaches to the Conservation of Cultural Heritage: Living Heritage; ICCORM: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ACHS. Association of Critical Heritage Studies: Heritage across Borders; ACHS: Houghton, MI, USA, 2011; Volume 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wells, J.C.; Stiefel, B.L. Human-Centered Built Environment Heritage Preservation: Theory and Evidence-Based Practice; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, L. Uses of Heritage; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labadi, S. UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value; AltaMira Press: Lanham, MD, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Tom, B. Jiirnnoddharana: The Hindu Philosophy of Conservation. Asian Heritage Management: Contexts, Concerns, and Prospects; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 35–49. [Google Scholar]
- Tomaszeswki, A. Tangible and Intangible Values of Cultural Property in Western Tradition and Science. In Proceedings of the 14th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: Place—Memory—Meaning: Preserving Intangible Values in Monuments and Sites, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, 27–31 October 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, Y. Conservation Management of World Heritage Cities in SouthEast Asia (Perspectives from Case Studies in Viet Nam and Philippines). Ph.D. Thesis, Unversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, Y. The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2006, 12, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fairclough, G.; Harrison, R.; Jameson, J.H.; Schofield, J. The Heritage Reader; Routledge: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, L.; Akagawa, N. Intangible Heritage; Routledge: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glendinning, M. The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation: Antiquity to Modernity; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Logan, W.; Wijesuriya, G. The New Heritage Studies and Education, Training, and Capacity-Building. In A Companion to Heritage Studies; Logan, W., Craith, M.N., Kocke, U., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 557–573. [Google Scholar]
- Wijesuriya, G. Living Heritage. In Sharing Conservation Decisions; Heritage, A., Copithorne, J., Eds.; ICCROM: Rome, Italy, 2018; pp. 43–56. Available online: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/sharing_conservation_decisions_2018_web.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- The World Bank. Economics Uniqueness Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development; Licciardi, G., Amirtahmasebi, R., Eds.; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Roders, A.P.; Veldpaus, L. Tolerance for Change in the Built Environment: What Are the Limits? In Culturele Draagkracht Op Zoek Naar de Tolerantie voor Verandering bij Gebouwd Erfgoed; Delft Digital Press: Delft, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]
- Araoz, G.F. Conservation Philosophy and Its Development: Changing Understandings of Authenticity and Significance. Herit. Soc. 2013, 6, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labadi, S.; Logan, W. Approaches to Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability. In Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- WCED. The Brundtland Report: “Our Common Future”; WCED: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [CrossRef]
- Logan, W.; Larsen, P.B. Policy-Making at the World Heritage-Sustainable Development Interface: Introductory Remarks. In World Heritage and Sustainable Development: New Directions in World Heritage Management; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avrami, E.; Mason, R. Mapping the Issue of Values. In Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Nocca, F. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holtorf, C.; Fairclough, G. The New Heritage and Re-Shapings of the Past. In Reclaiming Archaeology; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 197–210. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson, S.J.; Remøy, H.; Langston, C. Sustainable Building Adaptation Innovations in Decision-Making, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Pondicherry, India, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Managing Cultural World Heritage; UNESCO/ICCROM/ICOMOS/IUCN: Paris, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Auclair, E.; Fairclough, G. Living between Past and Future: An Introduction to Heritage and Cultural Sustainability. In Theory and Practice in Heritage and Sustainability; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Aureli, S.; Del Baldo, M. Stakeholders’ Consciousness of Cultural Heritage and the Reconciliation of Different Needs for Sustainable Development. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 13, 964–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urošević, N. Culture and Sustainable Urban Development: Valuing a Common European Heritage in Croatian Candidates for the ECOC. In Culture and Growth: Magical Companions or Mutually Exclusive Counterparts; Editura Universităţii: Umeå, Sweden, 2015; pp. 127–137. [Google Scholar]
- Bullen, P.A.; Love, P.E.D. Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings. Struct. Surv. 2011, 29, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizzo, I. The Economics of Conservation: The Role of Government and Policy Issues. In Digital Applications for Tangible Cultural; Archeolingua: Budapest, Hungary, 2008; pp. 83–94. [Google Scholar]
- Rojas, E. The Sustainable Conservation of Urban Heritage: A Concern of All Social Actors. In Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 235–255. [Google Scholar]
- Sandholz, S. Urban Centres in Asia and Latin America; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Butina, B. From the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World to the UNESCO World Heritage: Political and Economic Aspects of Institutionalised Cultural Preservation. Hrvat. Geogr. Glas. 2011, 73, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICOMOS. The Future of Our Pasts: Engaging Cultural Heritage in Climate Action. In International Council on Monuments and Sites; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2019; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. Resolutions of the General Assembly; Cambrdige University Press: New Delhi, India, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyslop, E. Interdisciplinarity in Heritage Conservation: Intersections with Climate Change and Sustainability; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avrami, E.; Mason, R.; de la Torre, M. Values and Heritage Conservation; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. Changing World, Changing Views of Heritage: Heritage and Social Change; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- The Getty Conservation Institute. Historic Urban Environment. Conservation Challenges and Priorities for Action; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Combi, M. Cultures and Technology: An Analysis of Some of the Changes in Progress-Digital, Global and Local Culture. In Cultural Heritage in a Changing World; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stone, S. UnDoing Buildings; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICOMOS. ICOMOS International Workshop on Impact of Climate Change on Cultural Heritage; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Harvey, D.C.; Perry, J. Heritage and Climate Change: The Future Is Not the Past. In The Future of Heritage as Climates Change; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 23–42. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. Triennial Scientific Plan 2021–24; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Keitsch, M.M. Heritage, Conservation, and Development. In Sustainable Cities and Communities, Encyclopedia ofthe UN Sustainable Development Goals; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dişli, G.; Ankaralıgil, B. Circular Economy in the Heritage Conservation Sector: An Analysis of Circularity Degree in Existing Buildings. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huuhka, S.; Vestergaard, I. Building Conservation and the Circular Economy: A Theoretical Consideration. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 10, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foster, G. Circular Economy Strategies for Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage Buildings to Reduce Environmental Impacts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 152, 104507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luciano, A.; Altamura, P.; Baiani, S.; Cutaia, L. The Building Stock as an Urban Mine: The Case of the Circular Regeneration of Disused Buildings. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 33, 101104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, A.L. Energy Retrofits in Historic and Traditional Buildings: A Review of Problems and Methods. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gravagnuolo, A.; Angrisano, M.; Nativo, M. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of Historic Buildings Conservation through Life Cycle Assessment in a Circular Economy Perspective. Aestimum 2020, 241–272. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, S.; Angel, V. Heritage and Waste: Introduction. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 10, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlovskis, M.; Migilinskas, D.; Antucheviciene, J.; Kutut, V. Ranking of Heritage Building Conversion Alternatives by Applying BIM and MCDM: A Case of Sapieha Palace in Vilnius. Symmetry 2019, 11, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Giudice, M.; Osello, A. Bim for Cultural Heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, XL-5/W2, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pocobelli, D.P.; Boehm, J.; Bryan, P.; Still, J.; Grau-Bové, J. BIM for Heritage Science: A Review. Herit. Sci. 2018, 6, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; Masciotta, M.G.; García-Alvarez, J.; Ramos, L.F.; Oliveira, D.V.; Martín-Jiménez, J.A.; González-Aguilera, D.; Monteiro, P. Web-GIS Approach to Preventive Conservation of Heritage Buildings. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Wu, C.; Xu, W.; Shen, Y.; Tang, F. Emerging Trends in GIS Application on Cultural Heritage Conservation: A Review. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.; Wang, X.; Luo, L.; Wan, H.; Ren, H. An Overview of GIS-RS Applications for Archaeological and Cultural Heritage under the DBAR-Heritage Mission. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Grussenmeyer, P.; Koehl, M.; Macher, H.; Murtiyoso, A.; Landes, T. Review of Built Heritage Modelling: Integration of HBIM and Other Information Techniques. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 46, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreier, M. Qualitative Content Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis; SAGE: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elo, S.; Kyngäs, H. The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 62, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taher Tolou Del, M.S.; Saleh Sedghpour, B.; Kamali Tabrizi, S. The Semantic Conservation of Architectural Heritage: The Missing Values. Herit. Sci. 2020, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barker, M. An Appraisal of Viollet-le-Duc (1814–1879) and His Influence. Decor. Arts Soc. 1850 Present 1992, 16, 116–135. [Google Scholar]
- Jokilehto, J. A History of Architectural Conservation, 1st ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viollet-le-Duc, E.; Hearn, M.F. The Architectural Theory of Viollet-le-Duc: Readings and Commentary; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardzinska-Bonenberg, T.; Bączkowska, M. Beauty of Historic Urban Centres—Evolution in Conservation Theory. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 2019, 12, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viollet-le-Duc, E. On Restoration; Sampson Low, Marston Low, and Searle: London, UK, 1875; Available online: https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=1BrmleeBMuMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA2&dq=the+restoration+Theory+of+Viollet-le-Duc&ots=KwemJx3B-F&sig=KN6f67mK4KMs9a1vI0eZOnWcNKs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=by-product&f=false (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Vaccaro, A. Restoration and Anti-Restoration. Historical and Philisophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1996; pp. 308–313. [Google Scholar]
- Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. The Foundations of Architecture: Selections from the Dictionnaire Raisonné; G. Braziller: New York, NY, USA, 1990; 272p. [Google Scholar]
- Ruskin, J. Seven Lamps of Architecture; Charles, E., Ed.; Merrill: Columbus, OH, USA, 1892; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
- Yazdani Mehr, S. Analysis of 19th and 20th Century Conservation Key Theories in Relation to Contemporary Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings. Heritage 2019, 2, 920–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burman, P. Ruskin’s Children: John Ruskin (1819–1900), the Good Steward, and His Influence Today; Polistampa: Firenze, Italy, 2008; pp. 1000–1021. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, N.L. An Introduction to Architectural Conservation; Plant, S., Ed.; RIBA Publishing: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yount, A.E. William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe. Ph.D. Thesis, Westerm Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, F. On Altering Architecture; Routledge: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmer, C. Riegl’s ‘Modern Cult of Monuments’ as a Theory Underpinning Practical Conservation and Restoration Work. J. Archit. Conserv. 2020, 26, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, T.M. Global Cultural Governance. Decision-Making Concerning World Heritage between Politics and Science. Erdkunde 2009, 63, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riegl, A. The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin. Oppositions 1982, 25, 20–51. [Google Scholar]
- Lamprakos, M. Riegl’s “Modern Cult of Monuments” and the Problem of Value. Change Time 2014, 4, 418–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riegl, A. The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Essence and Its Development. In Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1996; pp. 69–83. [Google Scholar]
- Athens Charter. The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments, Athens, Greece, 21–30 October 1931. In Proceedings of the 1st International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Athens, Greece, 21–30 October 1931. [Google Scholar]
- Petzet, M. Principles of Preservation: An Introduction to the International Charters for Conservation and Restoration 40 Years after the Venice Charter. In International Charters for Conservation and Restoration. Monuments & Sites; ICOMOS: Munich, Germany, 2004; pp. 7–29. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964); ICOMOS: Paris, France, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iamandi, C. The Charters of Athens of 1931 and 1933: Coincidence, Controversy and Convergence. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 1997, 2, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokilehto, J. The Context of the Venice Charter (1964). Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 1998, 2, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roders, A.P. Re-Architecture: Lifespan Rehabilitation of Built Heritage—Basis. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeeck, M. Brandi and the Restoration of Contemporary Art. One Side and the Other the Teoria. Conversacione 2019, 7, 211–226. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, L. Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings; e-book; Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH: Basel, Switzerland; Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Morera, C.S. Cesare Brandi and Contemporary Art: Theory, Aesthetic and Restoration. A Tempestuous Dialectic. Conversaciones 2019, 7, 249–266. [Google Scholar]
- Stanley-Price, N.; Price, N.; Talley, M.K.; Vaccaro, A.M. Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1996; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Jokilehto, J. A Century of Heritage Conservation. J. Archit. Conserv. 1999, 5, 14–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derman, B. Cultures of Development and Indigenous Knowledge: The Erosion of Traditional Boundaries. Afr. Today 2003, 50, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meraz, F. Cesare Brandi (1906 to 1988): His Concept of Restoration and the Dilemma of Architecture. Conversaciones 2019, 7, 160–174. [Google Scholar]
- Brandi, C. Theory of Restoration; Rockwell, C., Translator; Istituto Centrale per il Restauro, Nardini: Firenze, Italy, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Verbeeck, M. ‘There Is Nothing More Practical than a Good Theory’: Conceptual Tools for Conservation Practice. Stud. Conserv. 2016, 61, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokilehto, J. Considerations on Authenticity and Integrity. City Time 2006, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Villers, C. Post Minimal Intervention. Conservator 2004, 28, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Saaze, V. Key Concepts and Developments in Conservation Theory and Practice. In Installation Art and the Museum; Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 35–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barassi, S. Dreaming of a Universal Approach: Brandi’s Theory of Restoration and the Conservation of Contemporary Art. In Proceedings of the Conservation: Principles, Dilemmas and Uncomfortable Truths, London, UK, 24 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Walter, N. Conservation Practice and the Future of Doctrinal Texts. Prot. Cult. Herit. 2021, 12, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pane, A. Las Raíces de La Carta de Venecia. Loggia Arquit. Restaur. 2015, 27, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orbaşli, A. Architectural Conservaiton Principles and Practice; Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Szmygin, B.; Skoczylas, O. Factors Shaping the Venice Charter and Its Usefulness—On the Example of Heritage Protection in Poland. Teka Kom. Archit. Urban. Stud. Kraj. 2021, 17, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starn, R. Authenticity and Historic Preservation: Towards an Authentic History. Hist. Hum. Sci. 2002, 15, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logan, W. Introduction: Voices from the Periphery: The Burra Charter in Context. Hist. Environ. 2004, 18, 2–8. [Google Scholar]
- Lixinski, L. International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Viñas, S.M. Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Rev. Conserv. 2002, 3, 1–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICOMOS. Norms of Quito: Final Report of the Meeting on the Preservation and Utilization of Monuments and Sites of Artistic and Historical Value; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Mubaideen, S.; Al Kurdi, N. Heritage Conservation and Urban Development: A Supporting Management Model for the Effective Incorporation of Archaeological Sites in the Planning Process. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 28, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Getty Conservation Institute. Norms of Quito 1967. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/168-the-norms-of-quito (accessed on 11 December 2022).
- UNESCO. Recommendation Concerning the Preservation of Cultural Property Endangered by Public or Private Works; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Refug. Surv. Q. 1972, 8, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Getty Conservation Institute. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972). Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ (accessed on 11 December 2022).
- Jokilehto, J. Reflection on Historic Urban Landscapes as a Tool for Conservation. In UNESCO: Managing Historic Cities—World Heritage Papers 27; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- WHC. UNESCO World Heritage Centre—The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/ (accessed on 11 December 2022).
- UNESCO. Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Organisation of African Unity. Cultural Charter for Africa; Organisation of African Unity: Addis Abeba, Etiopia, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. The Australia ICOMOS Guidelines for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance The Burra Charter. 1979. Available online: https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/Burra-Charter_1979.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- ICOMOS. The Nara Document on Authenticity; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Australia ICOMOS. Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance (1999); Australia ICOMOS: Burwood, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, K. Cultural Heritage Management: A Possible Role for Charters and Principles in Asia. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2004, 10, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waterton, E.; Smith, L.; Campbell, G. The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies: The Burra Charter and Social Inclusion. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2006, 12, 339–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stovel, H. Origins and Influence of the Nara Document on Authenticity. APT Bull. J. Preserv. Technol. 2008, 39, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
- Akagawa, N. Rethinking the Global Heritage Discourse—Overcoming “East” and “West”? Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2016, 22, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokilehto, J.; Cameron, C. The World Heritage List. What Is OUV? Defining the Outstanding Universal Value of Cultural World Heritage Properties; Hendrik Bäßler Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2008; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Akagawa, N. Heritage Conservation in Japan’s Cultural Diplomacy: Heritage, National Identity and National Interest; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akagawa, N. Intangible Heritage and Embodiment: Japan’s Influence on Global Heritage Discourse. In A Companion to Heritage Studies; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Kwanda, T. Western Conservation Theory and the Asian Context: The Different Roots of Conservation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Heritage in Asia: Converging Forces and Conflicting Values, Singapore, 8–10 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
- de la Torre, M. Values and Heritage Conservation. Herit. Soc. 2013, 6, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICOMOS. Charter on the Built Vernacular Heritage; Ratified by the ICOMOS 12th General Assembly, in Mexico, October 1999; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 1999; Available online: https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/vernacular_e.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- UNESCO. The Budapest Declaration on World Heritage. In Proceedings of the UESCO World Heritage Committee, Budapest, Hungary, 6 May 2002; pp. 1–6, WHC-02/CON. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Vienna Memorandum on World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. The Valletta Principles for the Safeguarding and Management of Historic Cities, Towns and Urban Areas; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2011; Available online: https://civvih.icomos.org/valletta-principles-english-french/ (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- UNESCO. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. 2011. Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-638-98.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- ICOMOS; ICCROM. On Post-Disaster and Post-Conflict Recovery and Reconstruction for Heritage Places of Cultural Significance and World Heritage Cultural Properties. 2023. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/en/about-the-centre/89-english-categories/home/137854-new-icomos-iccrom-guidance-on-post-disaster-and-post-conflict-recovery-and-reconstruction (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- UN. The Paris Agreement; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5 °C; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
- Burke, S. The Long and Winding Road: A Challenge to ICOMOS Members. In Proceedings of the ICOMOS Scientific Symposium Dublin Castle, Dublin, Ireland, 30 October 2010; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
- Szmygin, B. A Variety of Conservation Principles and Methods the Basis of Contemporary Heritage Preservation. In E-Strategias Relativas al Patrimonio Cultural Mundial la Salvaguarda en un Mundo Globalizado. Principios, Practicas y Perspectivas; Comité Nacional Español del ICOMOS: Madrid, Spain, 2002; pp. 196–198. [Google Scholar]
- Waterton, E. Heritage and Community Engagement. In The Ethics of Cultural Heritage; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 53–67. [Google Scholar]
- Silberman, N.A. Heritage Places: Evolving Conceptions and Changing Forms. In A Companion to Heritage Studies; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 27–40. [Google Scholar]
- Vecco, M. A Definition of Cultural Heritage: From the Tangible to the Intangible. J. Cult. Herit. 2010, 11, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stovel, H. Effective Use of Authenticity and Integrity as World Heritage Qualifiying Conditions. City Time 2007, 2, 21–36. [Google Scholar]
- Alberts, C.H.; Hazen, D.H. Maintaining Authenticity and Integrity at Cultural World Heritage Sites. Geogr. Rev. 2010, 100, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appelbaum, B. Conservation Treatment Methodology; Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Viñas, S.M. Minimal Intervention Revisited. In Conservation Principles, Dilemmas and Uncomfortable Truths; Richmond, A., Bracker, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2009; pp. 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fairclough, G. Cultural Landscape, Sustainability, and Living with Change? In Managing Change: Sustainable Approaches to the Conservation of the Built Environment: 4th Annual US/ICOMOS International Symposium Organized by US/ICOMOS, Program in Historic Preservation of the University of Pennsylvania, and the Getty Conservation Institute; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Avrami, E.; Macdonald, S.; Mason, R.; Myers, D. Values in Heritage Management. Emerging Approaches and Research Directions; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klamer, A. The Values of Cultural Heritage. In Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2013; pp. 421–437. [Google Scholar]
- Klamer, A.; Mignosa, A.; Lyudmila, L. Cultural Heritage Policies: A Comparative Perspective. In Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2013; pp. 37–86. [Google Scholar]
- Benhamou, F. Public Intervention for Cultural Heritage: Normative Issues and Tools. In Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2013; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, K. Policy Review: Valuing Culture and Heritage Capital: A Framework Towards Informing Decision Making. Hist. Environ. Policy Pract. 2021, 12, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Throsby, D. Heritage Economics: Coming to Terms with Value and Valuation. Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 199–209. [Google Scholar]
- Allwood, J.M.; Ashby, M.F.; Gutowski, T.G.; Worrell, E. Material Efficiency: A White Paper. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 362–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bender, A.P.; Bilotta, P. Circular Economy and Urban Mining: Resource Efficiency in the Construction Sector for Sustainable Cities. In Sustainable Cities and Communities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 68–81. [Google Scholar]
- Alola, A.A.; Celik, A.; Obekpa, H.O.; Usman, O.; Echebiri, C. The Making-or-Breaking of Material and Resource Efficiency in the Nordics. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2023, 11, 100151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN-HABITAT. Urbanization and Development Emerging Futures; World Cities Report: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Assefa, G.; Ambler, C. To Demolish or Not to Demolish: Life Cycle Consideration of Repurposing Buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 28, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thormark, C. Conservation of Energy and Natural Resources by Recycling Building Waste. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2001, 33, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roussat, N.; Méhu, J.; Dujet, C. Indicators to Assess the Recovery of Natural Resources Contained in Demolition Waste. Waste Manag. Res. 2009, 27, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FutuREuse. FutREuse: Understanding Urban Stocks. 2021. Available online: https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:260522 (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- Foster, G.; Saleh, R. The Circular City and Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage Index: Measuring the Investment Opportunity in Europe. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 175, 105880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICOMOS. The Paris Declaration on Heritage as a Driver of Development (Adopted at Paris, UNESCO Headquarters, on Thursday 1st December 2011); ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Krauβ, W. Heritage and Climate Change: A Fatal Affair. In The Future of Heritage as Climates Change; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 43–61. [Google Scholar]
- Dawson, T. Taking the Middle Path to the Coast: How Community Collaboration Can Help Save Threatened Sites. In The Future of Heritage as Climates Change; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 249–267. [Google Scholar]
- Barthel-Bouchier, D. Conclusion: The Future of Heritage. In Cultural Heritage and the Challenge of Sustainability; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 177–196. [Google Scholar]
- Masciotta, M.G.; Morais, M.J.; Ramos, L.F.; Oliveira, D.V.; Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; González-Aguilera, D. A Digital-Based Integrated Methodology for the Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage: The Experience of HeritageCare Project. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 844–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuoto, A.; Funari, M.F.; Lourenço, P.B. On the Use of the Digital Twin Concept for the Structural Integrity Protection of Architectural Heritage. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jouan, P.; Hallot, P. Digital Twin: Research Framework to Support Preventive Conservation Policies. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. 2020, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabellone, F. Digital Twin: A New Perspective for Cultural Heritage Management and Fruition. Acta IMEKO 2022, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, C.; Remoy, H. Digital Twins to Enable Smart Heritage Facilities Management: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2 June 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luther, W.; Baloian, N.; Biella, D.; Sacher, D. Digital Twins and Enabling Technologies in Museums and Cultural Heritage: An Overview. Sensors 2023, 23, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hutson, J.; Weber, J.; Russo, A. Digital Twins and Cultural Heritage Preservation: A Case Study of Best Practices and Reproducibility in Chiesa Dei SS Apostoli e Biagio. Art Des. Rev. 2023, 11, 15–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chernbumroong, S.; Ariya, P.; Yolthasart, S.; Wongwan, N.; Intawong, K.; Puritat, K. Comparing the Impact of Non-Gamified and Gamified Virtual Reality in Digital Twin Virtual Museum Environments: A Case Study of Wieng Yong House Museum, Thailand. Heritage 2024, 7, 1870–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrighi, C.; Ballio, F.; Simonelli, T. A GIS-Based Flood Damage Index for Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023, 90, 103654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crowley, K.; Jackson, R.; O’connell, S.; Karunarthna, D.; Anantasari, E.; Retnowati, A.; Niemand, D. Cultural Heritage and Risk Assessments: Gaps, Challenges, and Future Research Directions for the Inclusion of Heritage within Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Management. Clim. Resil. Sustain. 2022, 1, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. New Life for Historic Cities The Historic Urban Landscape Approach Explained. 2013. Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/727/ (accessed on 6 August 2024).
- ICOMOS. Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas (Washington 1987). In Proceedings of the International Council on Momument and Site, Washington, DC, USA, 10–15 October 1987. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fayez, H. From ‘Objects’ to ‘Sustainable Development’: The Evolution of Architectural Heritage Conservation in Theory and Practice. Buildings 2024, 14, 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082566
Fayez H. From ‘Objects’ to ‘Sustainable Development’: The Evolution of Architectural Heritage Conservation in Theory and Practice. Buildings. 2024; 14(8):2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082566
Chicago/Turabian StyleFayez, Homaira. 2024. "From ‘Objects’ to ‘Sustainable Development’: The Evolution of Architectural Heritage Conservation in Theory and Practice" Buildings 14, no. 8: 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082566