Next Article in Journal
High Prevalence of Three Potyviruses Infecting Cucurbits in Oklahoma and Phylogenetic Analysis of Cucurbit Aphid-Borne Yellows Virus Isolated from Pumpkins
Next Article in Special Issue
Healthy Photosynthetic Mechanism Suggests ISR Elicited by Bacillus spp. in Capsicum chinense Plants Infected with PepGMV
Previous Article in Journal
Canine Distemper Outbreak by Natural Infection in a Group of Vaccinated Maned Wolves in Captivity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Induction of Fusarium lytic Enzymes by Extracts from Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Exploring the Potential of Meyerozyma guilliermondii on Physiological Performances and Defense Response against Fusarium Crown Rot on Durum Wheat

by Zayneb Kthiri 1,*, Maissa Ben Jabeur 1, Fadia Chairi 2, Camilo López-Cristoffanini 2, Marta López-Carbonell 2, Maria Dolores Serret 2,3, Jose Luis Araus 2,3, Chahine Karmous 1 and Walid Hamada 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 15 December 2020 / Revised: 25 December 2020 / Accepted: 28 December 2020 / Published: 8 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Resistance Induced by Microorganisms and Pathogens)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article reports the biocontrol of Fusarium disease in durum wheat by using seeds coated with M. guilliermondii. In general, the article is relevant for the plant pathogen community and presents interesting results. However, the manuscript is a bit disorganized (mainly in table and figure numbering) and the English language has to be revised (the discussion section is clearly better than other sections of the manuscript).

 

Introduction

Line 24: please replace 30,4% by 30.4%

Line 27: please italicize F. culmorum

Line 39: please remove the word “through”

Line 42: please correct “seed coating agents”; “to improve emergence..”

Line 50: please define ABA and IAA, as well as other abbreviations, the first time you mention them in the manuscript

Line 54: correct “the key steps”

Line 58: italicize F. verticillioides

Line 59: This sentence needs a reference in the end

Line 62: italicize Rhizopus nigricans

 

Results

Line 70: affected positively or negatively?

Line 76: shouldn’t it be table 2?

Line 89: please replace , by .

Line 101: you should add the units of each measurement to the table

Table 3: This table is very difficult to read, you should divide this table into two, for example; define DR and IR in the table footer

 

Discussion

Line 182: promoted seed development of which plant?

Line 189: “cambium cell division” is repeated

 

Materials and Methods

Line 286: specify the quantity of PDA

Line 288: specify the rpm/g settings of the rotary shaker

Line 289: specify how long was the centrifugation step

Line 298: Why are the seeds infected first and only them coated with the yeast? Why not the other way around?

Line 299: subsp. Should not be italicized

Line 304: please italicize F. culmorum; there are several cases like this, please italicize all species names

Line 306: please correct the centigrade symbol and correct the reference style for Jaber, 2018

Line 307: The coating product was used as a medium for the yeast? This is not clear

Line 315: please correct the centigrade symbol

Line 319 and 327: Shouldn’t it be figure 4 instead of 1?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript discusses the potential of a new Meyerozyma guillermondii strain for the control of Fusarium Crown rot in durum wheat. In addition to disease control, the seed treatment has to improvement growth and some parameters linked to the well-being of crop. The experimentation is interesting, clear, well done and well presented. I suggest, in a future paper, to evaluate the strain also with regard to a possible reduction of incidence and severity of Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin content (the main problem in Italian soft and durum wheat). Since I have not identified any particular concern to be solved, I consider the manuscript worthy of publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop