Next Article in Journal
COVID-19, Livestock Systems and Food Security in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Canine Circovirus in Foxes from Northern Italy: Where Did It All Begin?
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Methods Used for Diagnosing Tuberculosis in Captive and Free-Ranging Non-Bovid Species (2012–2020)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Molecular Investigation of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Infection in Pigs in Namibia

1
School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Neudamm Campus, University of Namibia, Private Bag, 13301 Windhoek, Namibia
2
Central Veterinary Laboratory (CVL), 24 Goethe Street, Private Bag, 18137 Windhoek, Namibia
3
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d’Accio S.P. 18, 64100 Teramo, Italy
4
Animal Production and Health Laboratory, Animal Production and Health Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, P.O. Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria
5
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(5), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050585
Submission received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 6 May 2021 / Accepted: 8 May 2021 / Published: 11 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Circoviruses)

Abstract

:
Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV-3) infection is widely distributed in domestic pig populations in America, Europe, and Asia. However, no data is currently available about its presence and distribution in Africa. This study investigated the presence of PCV-3 in pigs (n = 122) in Namibia, by means of biomolecular methods. The pig samples collected (n = 122) were representative of the swine industry in Namibia, covering the major pig production facilities in the country. All of the samples tested were negative for PCV-3, and this indicated that the virus was either not present in the country or was circulating at low levels. Further studies are needed to better understand the distribution, if any, of PCV-3 in Namibia.

1. Introduction

The family Circoviridae was established in the mid-1990s and contains small (15–25 nm in diameter), non-enveloped icosahedral viruses, with a circular and single-stranded DNA genome, classified in two distinct genera: Circovirus and Cyclovirus [1,2]. Although Cycloviruses have been reported in a wide range of mammals, birds, and insects, their host range and pathogenicity are still largely unknown [3,4]. On the contrary, members of the genus Circovirus are known to act as relevant pathogens in vertebrates [5]. At present, four distinct circoviruses have been identified in pigs. Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1) was originally discovered in 1974 as a contaminant of a porcine kidney cell line (PK-15) and, although widespread in the swine population, PCV-1 is considered non-pathogenic [5]. During the late 1990s, a second circovirus (namely, PCV-2) was identified as the primary causative agent of “porcine circovirus-associated diseases” (PCVAD), which have a large economic and welfare impact on the pig industry [6]. More recently, two additional circoviruses have been discovered in pigs (namely, PCV-3 and PCV-4). In 2016, PCV-3 was identified in the USA in sows showing PCVAD-like clinical signs and lesions, such as porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome, cardiac and multisystemic inflammation [7,8]. Since then, PCV-3 has been detected in many countries and is considered widely distributed in domestic pig and wild boar populations worldwide [9]. PCV-4 was identified in pigs with severe clinical disease in the Chinese province of Hunan, but its pathogenicity is still to be proven [10]. Very little is known about the geographical distribution of PCV-4 although a recent publication has indicated that the virus is not present in Italy or Spain [11].
The present study aimed at furthering our knowledge about the geographical distribution of PCV-3 in domestic pigs in Namibia.

2. Results

All of the 122 tested samples, obtained from domestic pigs, were negative for PCV-3.

3. Discussion

Data on the presence and geographic distribution of porcine circoviruses in Africa are limited. As reviewed by Afolabi et al. [12], PCV-2 infection has been reported in domestic pigs in some sub-Saharan countries, such as South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, and Cameroon. More recently, different PCV-2 genotypes have been detected in Namibian domestic pigs (PCV-2b and PCV-2d) and warthogs (PCV-2c) [13]. Since its original identification, a great interest raised toward the epidemiology and clinical significance of PCV-3, which has been so far identified in several countries suited to the pig production in Europe, Asia, and America [14,15]. To the best of our knowledge, no data is currently available about the presence and distribution of PCV-3 in the African continent. Based on the present study and the tested samples, there is no evidence of PCV-3 infection in Namibia. This result was unexpected given the high prevalence reported both in domestic and wild pigs suids worldwide [14,16] and considering that PCV-3 origin most likely occurred centuries ago, allowing a long-lasting viral circulation and transmission over long distances [14]. We can hypothesize that the restrictions to pig breeding due to religious practices and the effect of the African swine fever, as well as the presence of significant geographic barriers (i.e., Saharan desert) could have slowed down the spread of PCV-3 on the African continent. On the other hand, the documented presence of PCV-2, which has several biological and epidemiological similarities with PCV-3, in sub-Saharan Africa, including Namibia, goes against such a hypothesis. The sample size may also be a limiting factor in this study and does not exclude a low-level PCV-3 circulation. However, we consider this unlikely for different reasons. Firstly, the PCV-3 prevalence has been shown to be as high as 15–20%, both in domestic and wild populations [16,17,18,19]. Therefore, based on this expected prevalence, the number of samples analyzed from an estimated population of 40,000 pigs in Namibia should have allowed for the detection of low-level PCV-3 prevalence (i.e., 7%) with high (95%) confidence. This is supported by the fact that a lower number of samples (n = 88) was tested and confirmed the presence of PCV-2 in Namibia. Importantly, the current sampling was also representative of the biggest production facilities in Namibia, with approximately 40,000 pigs, located mainly in 3 districts (i.e., Mariental, Windhoek, and Tsumeb), all of which were sampled (Table 1). Of note, two of the sampled producers generate approximately 80% of the pig meat in the country. Although PCV-3 free status cannot be confidently extended to the whole Namibian pig population, it can be reasonably attributed to the main industrial production companies. The reasons for the difference compared to PCV-2 are currently unclear and will require further investigation. IfPCV-2 and PCV-3 display different susceptibilities to the implemented biosecurity measures will require further investigations. Alternatively, the circulation of highly divergent PCV-3 strains in the considered area could have affected the diagnostic assay sensitivity, in spite of three separate primer pairs being used in the sample screening. Although possible and worthy of future investigation, this hypothesis is lessened by the low evolutionary rate of PCV-3 and its low variability observed worldwide [14,15].

4. Materials and Methods

A total of 122 pigs were included in the present study. The minimum sample size was selected to demonstrate disease freedom in a 40,000 animal population with a confidence of 95%, considering an estimated assay sensitivity and specificity of 98% (obtained through intra-laboratory validation) and an expected prevalence of 7%. The prevalence was selected based on the results of other epidemiological studies, reporting a PCV-3 detection frequency always higher than 6% [16]. In more detail, if a random sample of at least 118 units is taken and 5 or fewer reactors are found, the probability that the population is infected at a prevalence of 7% is 0.0486.
Pigs under investigation belonged to commercial farms located in six Namibian regions (Omaheke, Oshikoto, Otjozondjupa, Hardap, Khomas, and Kunene) (Figure 1). Between 2018 and 2021, tonsils, spleen or lymph nodes were collected from slaughtered pigs (n = 70, age about 5–6 months, target weight of approximatively 75–100 kg) or from naturally dead pigs (n = 52), the latter sent to the Central Veterinary Laboratory (CVL, Windhoek, Namibia) for diagnostic purposes following an in loco post-mortem examination performed by state veterinarians. The majority of the received samples were suspicious of African swine fever. The age ranged from 3 months to 1 year old. Forty-six out of 122 pigs herein investigated had been previously tested for PCV-2 and 13 tested positive [13]. A part (50 mg) of every tissue sample was homogenized in 1 mL of sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) using a Tissue Lyser LT (Qiagen, Germany). Total genomic DNA was extracted from the homogenized samples using High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Hoffman–La Roche, Switzerland) with an elution volume of 100 μL, following the manufacturer’s instructions. For each unknown sample batch, a positive (PCV-3 positive serum sample) and negative control were extracted and tested together with the diagnostic samples. For the PCV-3 specific DNA detection in the total nucleic acid extract, three pairs of primers—PCV3-1-F (forward) 5-TTACTTAGAGAACGGACTTGTAACG-3 and PCV-3-1-R (reverse) 3-AAATGAGACACAGAGCTATATTCAG-5(pair 1),PCV3-genome-1-F(forward) 5-TAGTATTACCCGGCACCTCGGAACC-3 and PCV3-genome-1-R (reverse) 3-ACAGGTAAACGCCCTCGCATGTGGG-5 (pair 2), andPCV3-genome-2-F (forward) 5-TTGCACTTGTGTACAATTATTGCG -3 and PCV3-genome-2-R (reverse) 3-ATCTTCAGGACACTCGTAGCACCAC-5 (pair 3)—were used with the following thermal profile: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min and then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 60 s followed by a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min [20]. An endogenous internal control (i.e., swine actin) was also tested for each sample in a separate reaction. A 469bp region was amplified using the primer pair Act-F: 5-AGGGTCAGGATGCCTCTCTT-3 and Act-R 5-CGGCTTCCTTTGTCCCCAATCT-3. The thermal profile was the following: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min and then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 30 s followed by a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. All the PCRs were conducted in a reaction volume of 20 μL containing a final concentration of 10 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.25 mM MgCl2, 1× PCR buffer (QIAGEN), 2.5 U of Taq polymerase(QIAGEN), and 5 μL of template DNA. Amplification and specificity of bands were visualized using a SYBR safer stained 2% agarose gel.

5. Conclusions

Our data do not support the presence of PCV-3 in Namibia. We hope that the present study will stimulate further and larger investigations targeting the presence and molecular epidemiology of porcine circoviruses in Africa, which could provide useful information about the origin, evolution and relevance of porcine circoviruses in domestic and wild animal populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M. and U.M.; methodology, U.M.; investigation, F.M., Y.M.H., U.M. and B.C.; resources, S.K. and G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M.; writing—review and editing, G.F.; supervision, S.K., G.F. and G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study has been carried out in the framework of the Project Demetra (Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022, CUP_C46C18000530001) funded by the Italian Ministry for Education, University, and Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the use of secondary samples. The study did not involve animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funds from the IAEA Peaceful Uses Initiative (PUI) VETLAB Network. We thank William Dundon for his critical reading and editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Breitbart, M.; Delwart, E.; Rosario, K.; Segalés, J.; Varsani, A. Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Circoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 1997–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rosario, K.; Breitbart, M.; Harrach, B.; Segalés, J.; Delwart, E.; Biagini, P.; Varsani, A. Revisiting the taxonomy of the family Circoviridae: Establishment of the genus Cyclovirus and removal of the genus Gyrovirus. Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 1447–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yan, T.; Li, G.; Zhou, D.; Yang, X.; Hu, L.; Cheng, Z. Novel Cyclovirus Identified in Broiler Chickens with Transmissible Viral Proventriculitis in China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 67, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Phan, T.G.; Mori, D.; Deng, X.; Rajindrajith, S.; Ranawaka, U.; Fan, T.F.; Bucardo-Rivera, F.; Orlandi, P.; Ahmed, K.; Delwart, E. Small circular single stranded DNA viral genomes in unexplained cases of human encephalitis, diarrhea, and in untreated sewage. Virology 2015, 482, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Todd, D.; McNulty, M.S.; Adair, B.M.; Allan, G.M. Animal circoviruses. Virus Res. 2001, 57, 1–70. [Google Scholar]
  6. Segalés, J.; Allan, G.M.; Domingo, M. Circoviruses. In Diseases of Swine, 11th ed.; Zimmerman, J.J., Karriker, L.A., Ramirez, A., Schwartz, K.J., Stevenson, G.W., Zhang, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 473–487. [Google Scholar]
  7. Palinski, R.; Piñeyro, P.; Shang, P.; Yuan, F.; Guo, R.; Fang, Y.; Byers, E.; Hause, B.M. A Novel Porcine Circovirus Distantly Related to Known Circoviruses Is Associated with Porcine Dermatitis and Nephropathy Syndrome and Reproductive Failure. J. Virol. 2016, 91, e01879-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Phan, T.G.; Giannitti, F.; Rossow, S.; Marthaler, D.; Knutson, T.P.; Li, L.; Deng, X.; Resende, T.; Vannucci, F.; Delwart, E. Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation. Virol. J. 2016, 13, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ouyang, T.; Niu, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, L. Recent progress on porcine circovirus type 3. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 73, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhang, H.H.; Hu, W.Q.; Li, J.Y.; Liu, T.N.; Zhou, J.Y.; Opriessnig, T.; Xiao, C.T. Novel circovirus species identified in farmed pigs designated as Porcine circovirus 4, Hunan province, China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 7, 569098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Franzo, G.; Ruiz, A.; Grassi, L.; Sibila, M.; Drigo, M.; Segalés, J. Lack of Porcine circovirus 4 Genome Detection in Pig Samples from Italy and Spain. Pathogens 2020, 9, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Afolabi, K.O.; Iweriebor, B.C.; Okoh, A.I.; Obi, L.C. Global Status of Porcine circovirus Type 2 and Its Associated Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa. Adv. Virol. 2017, 2017, 6807964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Molini, U.; Franzo, G.; Gous, L.; Moller, S.; Hemberger, Y.M.; Chiwome, B.; Marruchella, G.; Khaiseb, S.; Cattoli, G.; Dundon, W.G. Three different genotypes of porcine circoviruses 2 (PCV-2) identified in pigs and warthogs in Namibia. Arch. Virol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Franzo, G.; He, W.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Li, G.; Legnardi, M.; Su, S.; Segalés, J. A Shift in Porcine Circovirus 3 (PCV-3) History Paradigm: Phylodynamic Analyses Reveal an Ancient Origin and Prolonged Undetected Circulation in the Worldwide Swine Population. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Franzo, G.; Delwart, E.; Fux, R.; Hause, B.; Su, S.; Zhou, J.; Segalés, J. Genotyping Porcine Circovirus 3 (PCV-3) Nowadays: Does It Make Sense? Viruses 2020, 2, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Klaumann, F.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Franzo, G.; Sibila, M.; Núñez, J.I.; Segalés, J. Current Knowledge on Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV-3): A Novel Virus With a Yet Unknown Impact on the Swine Industry. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 12, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Klaumann, F.; Dias-Alves, A.; Cabezón, O.; Mentaberre, G.; Castillo-Contreras, R.; López-Béjar, M.; Casas-Díaz, E.; Sibila, M.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Segalés, J. Porcine circovirus 3 is highly prevalent in serum and tissues and may persistently infect wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Franzo, G.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Drigo, M.; Cecchinato, M.; Martini, M.; Mondin, A.; Menandro, M.L. First report of wild boar susceptibility to Porcine circovirus type 3: High prevalence in the Colli Euganei Regional Park (Italy) in the absence of clinical signs. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Franzo, G.; Grassi, L.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Drigo, M.; Martini, M.; Pasotto, D.; Mondin, A.; Menandro, M.L. A wild circulation: High presence of Porcine circovirus 3 in different mammalian wild hosts and ticks. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ku, X.; Chen, F.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X.; Fan, S.; Qian, P.; Wu, M.; He, Q. Identification and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 in China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of Namibia showing the sampling locations as black dots.
Figure 1. Map of Namibia showing the sampling locations as black dots.
Pathogens 10 00585 g001
Table 1. Summary of the features of the samples included in the study.
Table 1. Summary of the features of the samples included in the study.
SpecieSamplesNumberFarmLocationRegion
PigTissue homogenates (spleen + lymph node)9AWindhoekKhomas
PigTissue homogenates (spleen + lymph node)5BWindhoekKhomas
PigTissue homogenates (Lymph node)21CGrootfontainOtjozondjupa
PigTissue homogenates (spleen + lymph node)7DGobabisOmaheke
PigTissue homogenates (tonsils)15EMarientalHardap
PigTissue homogenates (tonsils)15FMarientalHardap
PigTissue homogenates (tonsils)15GWindhoekKhomas
PigTissue homogenates (spleen + lymph node)10HOutjoKunene
PigTissue homogenates (Lymph node)25ITsumebOshikoto
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Molini, U.; Marruchella, G.; Matheus, F.; Hemberger, Y.M.; Chiwome, B.; Khaiseb, S.; Cattoli, G.; Franzo, G. Molecular Investigation of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Infection in Pigs in Namibia. Pathogens 2021, 10, 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050585

AMA Style

Molini U, Marruchella G, Matheus F, Hemberger YM, Chiwome B, Khaiseb S, Cattoli G, Franzo G. Molecular Investigation of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Infection in Pigs in Namibia. Pathogens. 2021; 10(5):585. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Molini, Umberto, Giuseppe Marruchella, Frieda Matheus, Yvonne Maria Hemberger, Bernard Chiwome, Siegfried Khaiseb, Giovanni Cattoli, and Giovanni Franzo. 2021. "Molecular Investigation of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Infection in Pigs in Namibia" Pathogens 10, no. 5: 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop