Next Article in Journal
The Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line COLO-680N Fails to Support Sustained Cryptosporidium parvum Proliferation
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Neurocognitive Symptoms Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/pathogens11010048
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Survey for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ in Citrus in Chile

by
Nicolas Quiroga
1,2,
Camila Gamboa
1,
Gabriela Medina
1,
Nicoletta Contaldo
3,
Fernando Torres
4,
Assunta Bertaccini
3,
Alan Zamorano
1 and
Nicola Fiore
1,*
1
Departamento de Sanidad Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, University of Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile
2
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Silvoagropecuarias y Veterinarias, Campus Sur Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile
3
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum—Università di Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
4
Subdepartamento Vigilancia y Control de Plagas Agrícolas, Departamento Sanidad Vegetal, División Protección Agrícola, Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Forestal y Semillas, Santiago 8320000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11010048
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Revised: 28 December 2021 / Accepted: 30 December 2021 / Published: 31 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The considerable economic losses in citrus associated with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ presence have alerted all producing regions of the world. In Chile, none of these bacteria have been reported in citrus species. During the years 2017 and 2019, 258 samples presenting symptoms similar to those associated with the presence of these bacteria were examined. No detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ associated with “huanglongbing” disease was obtained in the tested samples; therefore, this quarantine pest is maintained as absent in Chile. However, 14 plants resulted positive for phytoplasmas enclosed in subgroups 16SrV-A (12 plants) and 16SrXIII-F (2 plants). Although they have been found in other plant species, this is the first report of these phytoplasmas in citrus worldwide.

1. Introduction

Different species of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ have been reportedly associated with “huanglongbing” (HLB), the most important disease in citrus worldwide [1,2]. This disease is spread through a large part of citrus-growing areas worldwide [3,4]. In South America, ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ and ‘Ca. L. americanus’ are present in Brazil [5,6] and Paraguay [7], while only ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ is reported in Argentina and Colombia [8,9]. Furthermore, Diaphorina citri, the main vector of both bacteria, has been found in all these countries, and also in Uruguay [10], Ecuador [11], and Venezuela [12]. In the American continent, the presence of ‘Ca. L. africanus’ and its vector Trioza erytreae were never reported. Until recently, HLB-associated bacteria and their insect vector(s) have not been detected in Chile; since 2011, monitoring plans have been developed to prevent the entry of the disease’s agents and their insect vectors [13]. Given Chile’s geographic proximity to many countries in which they are present, the risk of the disease spread into its territory is high. Therefore, the Chilean citrus industry is making a great effort in monitoring and verifying the absence of these pathogens and of their insect vectors.
It has been repeatedly observed that citrus plants infected by ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ show the typical symptoms observed in HLB infected plants, such as irregular yellowing of the leaves and weakening of the tree. In some cases, it was possible to verify co-infection between the two bacteria [14,15,16]. For this reason, both pathogens were surveyed to verify the local situation [17] with a meticulous inspection followed by specific molecular tests to verify the presence of these bacteria in citrus plants in Chile. The sampling was mainly directed to plants showing symptoms attributable to these bacteria in all the citrus growing areas of the country.

2. Results

All the PCR analyses for the detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ species in citrus samples were negative. However, 14 samples were positive for phytoplasma presence after amplification on 16S rRNA and Ssu12p genes [18,19]. The amplicons obtained were cloned, and five clones of each sample were sequenced. The sequences resulting from the five clones obtained from each sample were identical and were aligned and compared with the phytoplasma sequences available in GenBank (NCBI).
A 100% nucleotide identity in the 16S rRNA gene was present with samples enclosed in the ‘Ca. P. ulmi’ and ‘Ca. P. hispanicum’ strains. In the case of the Ssu12p gene, the nucleotide identity percentages observed were 99.52% and 100% in comparison with the sequences available in GenBank, respectively. Among the 14 phytoplasma-positive samples, 12 were infected by ‘Ca. P. ulmi’ (elm yellows group, 16SrV-A), and two were infected by ‘Ca. P. hispanicum’ strains (Mexican periwinkle virescence group, 16SrXIII-A). Maximum parsimony phylogenetic reconstruction using 16S rRNA and Ssu12p gene sequences, including the strains obtained in this study, confirm that the detected phytoplasmas cluster with phytoplasmas enclosed in ribosomal groups 16SrV and 16SrXIII. In particular, phytoplasma strains from the samples CTC 202, CTC 199, and CTC 192 are closely related to the strain EY1 (GenBank accession number AY197655) (Figure 1A). Strains CTC 170 and CTC 134 grouped with those of the ribosomal subgroup 16SrXIII-F, in particular, strain StrCL-1 (GenBank accession number MH939193), from a Chilean strawberry sample. The phylogenetic tree of the Ssu12p gene confirms these phylogenetic relationships (Figure 1B).
Furthermore, the sequence of sample CTC 192 (deposited in GenBank under the accession number OL677628) was subjected to RFLP in silico to complete the identification of the phytoplasmas at the ribosomal subgroup level using the enzymes RsaI and BfaI for phytoplasmas enclosed in the 16SrV group [20]. The virtual digestion with the RsaI enzyme showed that the profiles of the strains corresponding to groups 16SrV-A, 16SrV-C, 16SrV-D, and 16SrV-E were identical to the one of this strain. The digestion with the BfaI enzyme generated differentiable profiles with the strains of the mentioned subgroups, identical only to those of the ribosomal subgroup 16SrV-A (Figure 2). The enzymes used for in silico RFLP of the phytoplasma strain CTC170 (deposited in GenBank under the accession number OL672243) were KpnI and RsaI [21]. Both digestion profiles show that the Chilean strains are identical to the strains in the subgroup 16SrXIII-F (Figure 3).
The molecular characterization of the strains from 14 citrus samples indicates that 12 samples were positive for phytoplasmas enclosed in the subgroup 16SrV-A, and two samples were positive for phytoplasmas enclosed in subgroup 16SrXIII-F. The overall percentage of phytoplasma infection in the plants was 5.43%. The citrus samples positive for 16SrV-A phytoplasmas were collected in two orchards, both located in the Metropolitana Region (Table 2). The symptoms showed by these plants were leaf yellowing undistinguishable from those reported as associated with the presence of ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ (Figure 4). The samples positive for 16SrXIII-F phytoplasmas were collected in two orchards located in the O’Higgins Region (Table 2), showing (sample CTC134) symptoms of generalized yellowing of the tree, abortion of fruits, defoliation of shoots, and asynchronous flowering compared with non-infected trees. Sample CTC 134 showed threadlike leaves and witches’ broom shoots (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

This survey provides results about the monitoring of HLB and phytoplasma presence in citrus species in Chile. The country maintains the absence of bacterial species and insect vectors of HLB disease in citrus plants. It is important to note that the Chilean Agricultural and Livestock Service (SAG) has, since 2011, been carrying out an intense sampling monitoring to detect these bacteria and their main insect vector, D. citri. In addition, SAG personnel are constantly developing technical dissemination and training sessions for producers with the objective of preventing a possible epidemic with timely detection, avoiding the spread of the disease in Chilean territory. To date, 7809 samples from all citrus-producing regions in Chile were tested by SAG (personal communication), including citrus plants used as ornamentals [22]. In this study, highly suspected plants were sampled, and different detection protocols were applied in different laboratories in and out of Chile to confirm the results obtained.
Symptoms attributable to HLB have been observed in various citrus orchards in Chile. However, molecular tests to verify the liberibacters presence were negative. It is possible to attribute the symptom observed to various factors, such as nutritional deficiencies, insect attack, presence of soil pathogens, or insufficient general agronomic management. This work confirms that phytoplasmas are associated with symptoms like those induced by ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ species in citrus, as reported in China, Brazil, Mexico, and the Caribbean (Cuba, Guadeloupe, and Jamaica), where phytoplasmas were also identified in plants with HLB symptoms and co-infections between pathogens [14,15,17,23,24]. Moreover, the only phytoplasma presence was associated with HLB-like symptoms in both Asian and American countries [23,24,25,26,27]. The samples positive for phytoplasma 16SrV-A in this study showed leaf symptoms resembling those shown by HLB-infected plants. This situation has been frequently observed in regions where other phytoplasmas have been identified as infecting citrus [14,15,17,28]. On the other hand, citrus samples positive for phytoplasma 16SrXIII-F showed symptoms more commonly associated with the presence of these pathogens, such as witches’ broom, severe leaf deformation, and flower alterations. This symptomatology has also been described in citrus plants infected by 16SrII group phytoplasmas (‘Ca. P. aurantifolia’ and related strains) in Asia and Australia [27,29].
The information provided by this study represents the first report of phytoplasmas in citrus plants in Chile. Furthermore, this is the first detection of the phytoplasmas 16SrV-A and 16SrXIII-F in citrus plants in the world. Phytoplasmas of the ribosomal group 16SrII have been reported to infect citrus plants in Brazil, China, and Iran [22,30,31]. Furthermore, in Brazil, the phytoplasmas of the ribosomal groups 16SrIII and 16SrIX have been detected [17,28]. In Mexico and China, a ‘Ca. P. asteris’ strain (16SrI) was reported [14,15]. Specific detections of ribosomal subgroups not widely distributed worldwide include the 16SrIX group in lemon and orange trees in Puerto Rico [32] and a phytoplasma of the 16SrXIV-A subgroup in lemon trees in India [33]. The presence of 16SrV-A phytoplasma in Chile was previously identified in vineyards of the Metropolitana Region, associated with reddening and short internodes of the grapevine shoots [34]. Moreover, transmission tests with the leafhopper Amplicephalus curtulus, widespread in the central zone of Chile, showed the ability of this insect species to transmit the 16SrV-A phytoplasmas [35]. On the other hand, the phytoplasma 16SrXIII-F was detected for the first time in Chile in strawberry orchards of the Region of Valparaíso, associated with symptoms of phyllody and virescence [36]. Subsequent studies showed that this phytoplasma was present in all the strawberry production regions in Chile, including the localities where positive citrus samples have been detected in this survey [21,37]. In addition, this phytoplasma has been reported in calafate (Berberis microphylla G. Forst.), a shrub of the Berberidaceae family native to Chilean and Argentinian Patagonia [38,39]. So far, the vector(s) of this phytoplasma is not known. The 16SrXIII group is widely distributed in the other countries of South America, affecting various crops such as potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.), and papaya (Carica papaya L.), among others [40,41,42,43].
Evidence shows that citrus phytoplasma infections are sporadic in isolated orchards, sometimes in remote areas surrounded by spontaneous vegetation. In times with higher-than-average rainfall during spring and autumn, the growth of spontaneous shrubs and weeds is favored, thereby increasing insect-feeding in these plants. Insect vectors can, therefore, sporadically visit crops and transmit phytoplasmas, suggesting that spontaneous vegetation may also be a reservoir for these phytoplasmas [29,44,45]. This situation has been evidenced in epidemiological studies associated with grapevine yellows in Chile [46,47,48].
The presence of viruses and viroids that infect citrus plants in Chile could lead to confusion among the symptoms. It is essential to consider all these factors in the climate change scenario. Studies carried out in Chile show that the climatic conditions that are projected for the future could influence the appearance of diseases of alien origin [49]. The discovery of phytoplasmas associated with symptoms like those of HLB reinforces the need to continue monitoring and promoting epidemiological studies on citrus. Preventing these diseases is everyone’s job, including governments, nurseries, technical advisers, producers, and researchers. Chile is surrounded by countries in which HLB and its insect vector D. citri are present. Fortunately, the country has climatic and geographical barriers that have contributed positively to the present local phytosanitary situation. Chile has great potential as a citrus-growing country and being an HLB-free territory is a commercial advantage that should not be lost.

4. Materials and Methods

From the main citrus-producing areas of Chile, 258 samples were collected in two areas during two periods. From December 2017 to April 2018, the regions of Tarapacá, Coquimbo, and Valparaíso were surveyed. The second sampling period was carried out between November 2018 to April 2019 in the Regions of Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Maule, and Metropolitana. The number of samples was established based on the number of hectares planted per region; one sample was collected for every 100 ha (Table 3). The samples were collected mainly from citrus trees that showed symptoms referable to HLB, like yellow shoots, leaves with asymmetric chlorotic spots, and thick and leathery texture [50]. In addition, trees with symptoms associated with phytoplasma presence, such as witches’ broom, flower abnormalities, and general decline, were sampled [15,27,29]. Samples that presented symptoms of water deficiency, nutritional deficiencies, nematode, and insect attacks, and phytotoxicity were not collected. In orchards where no symptoms attributable to these pathogens were observed, asymptomatic plants were randomly sampled. Each sample corresponds to one tree, from which four 15 cm long shoots with at least 5 leaves were collected from different sides of the tree. The geographic coordinates and the origin of the collected samples were recorded. The samples were transported in thermoregulated containers and stored at 4 °C before nucleic acid extraction.
DNA was extracted from 1 g of midribs using the CTAB method [48]. The nucleic acids were dissolved in Tris-EDTA buffer pH 8.0 and kept at 4 °C. All samples were analyzed by PCR and nested-PCR. For the detection of ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ species five amplification protocols were used: three universal 16S and 23S gene PCRs [51,52]; a PCR-duplex, for the simultaneous and specific detection of the three HLB-associated ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ species [5,53], and a universal nested PCR for the three species [54,55]. Phytoplasma detection was performed by nested-PCR of the 16S rRNA gene [18] and the gene coding the ribosomal Ssu12p gene [19]. The PCR products obtained for both genes were purified from the agarose gel using the EZNA® Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). The DNA fragments were ligated into the cloning vector pGEM-T Easy, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega Inc., Fitchburg, WI, USA). Putative recombinant clones were analyzed by colony PCR and selected fragments sequenced in both directions at Psomagen Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA). The sequences were aligned with the GenBank database using the BLAST engine for local alignment (Blast version N 2.2.12) and compared with those of phytoplasmas published in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) available on the internet (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/, accessed on 15 November 2021) [56]. The restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was performed in silico with the appropriate restriction enzymes according to the ribosomal groups obtained. The in silico RFLPs were generated in the iPhyClassifier online tool (https://plantpathology.ba.ars.usda.gov/cgi-bin/resource/iphyclassifier.cgi, accessed on 15 November 2021) [57].

5. Conclusions

The results presented in this study indicate that Chile is free from the “huanglongbing” associated bacteria, maintaining its status of absence of this quarantine pathogen. In the citrus industry of Chile, government services and researchers maintain a constant interaction to prevent the entry of these pathogens and their insect vectors. In some plants that presented symptoms like those of HLB, phytoplasmas enclosed in 16SrV-A and 16SrXIII-F subgroups were detected. This is the first report of phytoplasmas in citrus in Chile; the identified phytoplasmas were not described in other citrus-growing regions in the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, resources, review, and editing, N.Q., N.F. and A.B.; data curation, formal analysis, and original manuscript draft preparation, N.Q., C.G., G.M. and N.C.; bioinformatics analysis, N.Q. and A.Z.; support in the sampling activity and original manuscript draft preparation, F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out within the framework of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 727459.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

The GenBank Accession Numbers presented in this study are openly available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at NCBI nucleotide (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/, accessed on 15 November 2021).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Cooperativa Agrícola Vitivinícola Loncomilla, who contributed to the survey in the Maule Region, and the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT) for PhD Scholarship No. 21171998.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bové, J.-M. “Huanglongbing”: A destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 88, 7–37. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cevallos-Cevallos, J.M.; Futch, D.B.; Shilts, T.; Folimonova, S.Y.; Reyes-De-Corcuera, J.I. GC–MS metabolomic differentiation of selected citrus varieties with different sensitivity to citrus “huanglongbing”. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 53, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. FAO para América Latina y el Caribe. Available online: https://www.fao.org/americas/prioridades/hlb/es/ (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  4. Cardinali, M.C.D.B.; Boas, P.R.V.; Milori, D.M.B.P.; Ferreira, E.J.; e Silva, M.F.; Machado, M.A.; Bellete, B.S.; Silva, M.F.D.G.F.D. Infrared spectroscopy: A potential tool in “huanglongbing” and citrus variegated chlorosis diagnosis. Talanta 2012, 91, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teixeira, D.D.C.; Danet, J.-L.; Eveillard, S.; Martins, E.C.; Junior, W.C.D.J.; Yamamoto, P.T.; Lopes, S.A.; Bassanezi, R.B.; Ayres, A.J.; Saillard, C.; et al. Citrus “huanglongbing” in São Paulo State, Brazil: PCR detection of the ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ species associated with the disease. Mol. Cell. Probes 2005, 19, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Texeira, D.C.; Ayres, J.; Kitajima, E.W.; Danet, L.; Jagoueix-Eveillard, S.; Saillard, C.; Bové, J.-M. First report of a “huanglongbing”-like disease of citrus in Sao Paulo State, Brazil and association of a new liberibacter species, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter americanus’, with the disease. Plant Dis. 2005, 89, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. EPPO Global Database. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/LIBEAS/distribution/PY (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  8. Badaracco, A.; Redes, F.J.; Preussler, C.A.; Agostini, J.P. Citrus “huanglongbing” in Argentina: Detection and phylogenetic studies of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2017, 46, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Araque, W.; Arévalo, E. Potencial distribución espacial del vector del HLB de los cítricos Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) en el departamento del Tolima, Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortíc. 2018, 12, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. INIA Uruguay. Available online: http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/1427/1/111219240807151515.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2021).
  11. Cornejo, J.; Chica, E. First record of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Ecuador infesting urban citrus and orange jasmine trees. J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Fonseca, O.; Valera, N.; Vásquez, C. Registro y ciclo de vida de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) en tres hospederos en el estado Lara, Venezuela. Entomotróp. Rev. Int. Estud. Entomol. 2007, 22, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  13. Comité de cítricos de Chile. Available online: https://comitedecitricos.cl/en/international-news/568-2014-10-07-18-09-05 (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  14. Chen, J.; Pu, X.; Deng, X.; Liu, S.; Li, H.; Civerolo, E. A phytoplasma related to ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ detected in citrus showing “huanglongbing” (yellow shoot disease) symptoms in Guangdong, P.R. China. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Arratia-Castro, A.A.; Santos-Cervantes, M.E.; Fernández-Herrera, E.; Chávez-Medina, J.A.; Flores-Zamora, G.L.; Camacho-Beltrán, E.; Méndez-Lozano, J.; Leyva-López, N.E. Occurrence of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ in citrus showing “huanglongbing” symptoms in Mexico. Crop. Prot. 2014, 62, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghosh, D.K.; Motghare, M.; Kokane, A.; Kokane, S.; Warghane, A.; Bhose, S.; Surwase, D.; Ladaniya, M.S. First report of a ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma cynodontis’-related strain (group 16SrXIV) associated with “huanglongbing” disease on Citrus grandis. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 2019, 14, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wulff, N.A.A.; Fassini, C.G.; Marques, V.V.; Martins, E.; Coletti, D.A.B.; Teixeira, D.D.C.; Sanches, M.M.; Bové, J.-M. Molecular characterization and detection of 16SrIII group phytoplasma associated with “huanglongbing” symptoms. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gundersen, D.E.; Lee, I.-M. Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 1996, 35, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cui, W.; Zamorano, A.; Quiroga, N.; Bertaccini, A.; Fiore, N. Ribosomal protein coding genes SSU12p and LSU36p as molecular markers for phytoplasma detection and differentiation. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2021, 60, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sinclair, W.A.; Townsend, A.M.; Griffiths, H.M.; Whitlow, T.H. Responses of six Eurasian Ulmus cultivars to a North American elm yellows phytoplasma. Plant Dis. 2000, 84, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Cui, W.; Quiroga, N.; Curkovic, S.T.; Zamorano, A.; Fiore, N. Detection and identification of 16SrXIII-F and a novel 16SrXIII phytoplasma subgroups associated with strawberry phyllody in Chile. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 155, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Torres, F.; SAG, Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Santiago, Chile. Personal communication, 2020.
  23. Lou, B.; Bai, X.; Bai, Y.; Deng, C.; RoyChowdhury, M.; Chen, C.; Song, Y. Detection and molecular characterization of a 16SrII-A* phytoplasma in grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) with “huanglongbing”-like symptoms in China. J. Phytopathol. 2013, 162, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luis-Pantoja, M.; Paredes-Tomás, C.; Uneau, Y.; Myrie, W.; Morillon, R.; Satta, E.; Contaldo, N.; Pacini, F.; Bertaccini, A. Identification of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ species in “huanglongbing” infected citrus orchards in the Caribbean. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 160, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Das, A.; Nerkar, S.; Thakre, N.; Kumar, A. First report of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma trifolii’ (16SrVI group) in Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata) showing “huanglongbing” symptoms in central India. New Dis. Rep. 2016, 34, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Al-Ghaithi, A.G.; Al-Sadi, A.M.; Al-Hammadi, M.S.; Al-Shariqi, R.M.; Al-Yahyai, R.A.; Al-Mahmooli, I.H.; Carvalho, C.M.; Elliot, S.L.; Hogenhout, S.A. Expression of phytoplasma-induced witches’ broom disease symptoms in acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) trees is affected by climatic conditions. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 1380–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zreik, L.; Carle, P.; Bové, J.-M.; Garnier, M. Characterization of the mycoplasmalike organism associated with witches’-broom disease of lime and proposition of a ‘Candidatus’ taxon for the organism, ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1995, 45, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Teixeira, D.; Wulff, N.A.; Martins, E.; Kitajima, E.W.; Bassanezi, R.; Ayres, A.J.; Eveillard, S.; Saillard, C.; Bové, J.M. A phytoplasma closely related to the pigeon pea witches’-broom phytoplasma (16Sr IX) is associated with citrus “huanglongbing” symptoms in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Davis, R.I.; Schneider, B.; Gibb, K.S. Detection and differentiation of phytoplasmas in Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1997, 48, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silva, F.N.; Queiroz, R.B.; de Souza, A.N.; Al-Sadi, A.; Siqueira, D.L.; Elliot, S.L.; Carvalho, C.M. First report of a 16SrII-C phytoplasma associated with asymptomatic acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Faghihi, M.; Bagheri, A.; Seyahooei, M.A.; Pezhman, A.; Faraji, G. First report of a ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’-related strain associated with witches’ broom disease of limequat in Iran. New Dis. Rep. 2017, 35, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Caicedo, J.D.; Rivera-Vargas, L.I.; Segarra, A.E.; Davis, R.E. Detection and molecular characterisation of a group 16SrIX phytoplasma infecting citrus (Citrus sinensis and C. limon), coffee (Coffea arabica), periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus), and tabebuia (Tabebuia heterophylla) in Puerto Rico. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 2015, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ghosh, D.K.; Bhose, S.; Sharma, P.; Warghane, A.; Motghare, M.; Ladaniya, M.S.; Reddy, M.K.; Thorat, V.; Yadav, A. First report of a 16SrXIV group phytoplasma associated with witches’-broom disease of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) in India. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fiore, N.; Zamorano, A.; Pino, A.M.; Maria, F.N.Z.A.P.A. Identification of phytoplasmas belonging to the ribosomal groups 16SrIII and 16SrV in Chilean grapevines. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 2015, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arismendi, N.L.; Riegel, R.; Carrillo, R. In vivo transmission of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ by Amplicephalus curtulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and its effect on ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum cv. tama). J. Econ. Èntomol. 2014, 107, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Quiroga, N.; Cabera, M.; Valdera, M.; Rodríguez, E.; Coronado, R.; Zamorano, A.; Fiore, N. Molecular characterization of a phytoplasma associated to phyllody and witches’ broom in strawberry (Fragaria x ananasa). In Proceedings of the XXIV Congreso de la Sociedad Chilena de Fitopatología, Viña del mar, Chile, 1–3 December 2015. 13p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cui, W.; Quiroga, N.; Bertaccini, A.; Zamorano, A.; Fiore, N. Use of 12p and 36p genes as molecular markers in support of subgroup identification of two 16SrXIII phytoplasmas associated with strawberry phyllody in Chile. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 2019, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Varas, B.; Castro, M.H.; Rodríguez, R.; Von Baer, D.; Mardones, C.; Hinrichsen, P. Identification and characterization of microsatellites from calafate (Berberis microphylla, Berberidaceae)1. Appl. Plant Sci. 2013, 1, 1200003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Madariaga, M.; Ramírez, I. Identification of a phytoplasma associated with witches’ broom symptoms in calafate (Berberis microphylla G. Forst.). Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 79, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santos-Cervantes, M.E.; Chávez-Medina, J.A.; Acosta-Pardini, J.; Flores-Zamora, G.L.; Méndez-Lozano, J.; Leyva-López, N.E. Genetic diversity and geographical distribution of phytoplasmas associated with potato purple top disease in Mexico. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Eckstein, B.; Barbosa, J.C.; Kreyci, P.F.; Canale, M.C.; Brunelli, K.R.; Bedendo, I.P. Broccoli stunt, a new disease in broccoli plants associated with three distinct phytoplasma groups in Brazil. J. Phytopathol. 2013, 161, 442–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Melo, L.; Silva, E.; Flôres, D.; Ventura, J.; Costa, H.; Bedendo, I. A phytoplasma representative of a new subgroup, 16SrXIII-E, associated with papaya apical curl necrosis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2013, 137, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fernández, F.D.; Meneguzzi, N.G.; Guzmán, F.A.; Kirschbaum, D.S.; Conci, V.C.; Nome, C.F.; Conci, L.R. Detection and identification of a novel 16SrXIII subgroup phytoplasma associated with strawberry red leaf disease in Argentina. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2741–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Broadbent, P.; Fraser, L.R.; McGechan, J. Australian citrus dieback. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Organization of Citrus Virologists Conference, Athens, Greece, 29 September–4 October 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Timer, L.W.; Garney, S.M.; Graham, J.H. PART I: Infectious (biotic) diseases. In Compendium of Citrus Diseases, 2nd ed.; The American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2000; pp. 5–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Quiroga, N.; Longone, V.; González, X.; Zamorano, A.; Pino, A.M.; Picciau, L.; Alma, A.; Paltrinieri, S.; Contaldo, N.; Bertaccini, A.; et al. Transmission of 16SrIII-J phytoplasmas by the leafhoppers Paratanus exitiousus and Bergallia valdiviana. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2019, 58, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Quiroga, N.; Soto, D.; Farah, P.; Pino, A.M.; Zamorano, A.; Alma, A.; Picciau, L.; Fiore, N. New contribution about the epidemiology of grapevine yellows associated phytoplasmas in Chile. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 2019, 9, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Quiroga, N.; Gamboa, C.; Soto, D.; Pino, A.M.; Zamorano, A.; Campodonico, J.; Alma, A.; Bertaccini, A.; Fiore, N. Update and new epidemiological aspects about grapevine yellows in Chile. Pathogens 2020, 9, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Quiroga, N.; Ivulic, D.; Lagos, J.; Saavedra, M.; Sandoval-Rodríguez, A.; Infante, R.; Morales, L.; Fiore, N. Risk analysis of the establishment of Scaphoideus titanus, vector of “flavescence dorée” phytoplasma in grapevine, under current and estimated climate change conditions in Chile. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 2017, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gottwald, T.R. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus “huanglongbing”. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Angelini, E.; Clair, D.; Borgo, M.; Bertaccini, A.; Boudon-Padieu, E. “Flavescence dorée” in France and Italy—Occurrence of closely related phytoplasma isolates and their near relationships to Palatinate grapevine yellows and an alder yellows phytoplasma. Vitis 2001, 40, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fujikawa, T.; Miyata, S.-I.; Iwanami, T. Convenient detection of the citrus greening (“huanglongbing”) bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ by direct PCR from the midrib extract. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Zafarullah, A.; Saleem, F. Detection and molecular characterization of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter spp´. causing “huanglongbing” (HLB) in indigenous citrus cultivars in Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2016, 48, 2071–2076. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hocquellet, A.; Toorawa, P.; Bové, J.-M.; Garnier, M. Detection and identification of the two ‘Candidatus Liberobacter’ species associated with citrus “huanglongbing” by PCR amplification of ribosomal protein genes of the β operon. Mol. Cell. Probes 1999, 13, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jagoueix, S.; Bové, J.-M.; Garnier, M. PCR detection of the two ‘Candidatus Liberobacter’ species associated with greening disease of citrus. Mol. Cell. Probes 1996, 10, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhao, Y.; Wei, W.; Lee, I.-M.; Shao, J.; Suo, X.; Davis, R.E. Construction of an interactive online phytoplasma classification tool, iPhyClassifier, and its application in analysis of the peach X-disease phytoplasma group (16SrIII). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2582–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 11 00048 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of (A) 16S rRNA gene region (1240 nt) and (B) Ssu12p region (724 nt) enclosing phytoplasmas detected in citrus from Chile, highlighted with filled diamonds, and selected ‘Ca. Phytoplasma’ strains. Information on the phytoplasma strains is reported in Table 1. The tree was constructed using the maximum parsimony algorithm. The numbers in the nodes represent starting values based on 500 pseudo-replications for stability estimation and clade support A. laidlawii is used as outgroup strain.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of (A) 16S rRNA gene region (1240 nt) and (B) Ssu12p region (724 nt) enclosing phytoplasmas detected in citrus from Chile, highlighted with filled diamonds, and selected ‘Ca. Phytoplasma’ strains. Information on the phytoplasma strains is reported in Table 1. The tree was constructed using the maximum parsimony algorithm. The numbers in the nodes represent starting values based on 500 pseudo-replications for stability estimation and clade support A. laidlawii is used as outgroup strain.
Pathogens 11 00048 g001
Pathogens 11 00048 g002 550
Figure 2. In silico RFLP profiles of the phytoplasma strains in the 16SrV subgroups. (A) Restriction profiles generated by the RsaI enzyme. (B) Restriction profiles generated by the BfaI enzyme. CTC 192 is a citrus sample. MW: molecular marker PhiX174 digested with HaeIII. Fragment size (nt) from top to bottom: 1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, 281, 271, 234, 194, 118, and 72. Phytoplasmas used for comparison are: 16SrV-A, elm yellows (EY) ‘Ca. P. ulmi ‘(GenBank accession number: AY197655); 16SrV-B, jujube witches’ broom (JWB-G1) ‘Ca. P. ziziphi ‘(GenBank accession number: AB052876); 16SrV-C, “flavescence dorée” (FD-C) (GenBank accession number: X76560); 16SrV-D, “flavescence dorée” (FD-D) (GenBank accession number: AJ548787); 16SrV-E, rubus stunt (RuS) ‘Ca. P. rubi ‘(GenBank accession number: AY197648); 16SrV-G, Korean jujube witches’ broom (GenBank accession number: AB052879).
Figure 2. In silico RFLP profiles of the phytoplasma strains in the 16SrV subgroups. (A) Restriction profiles generated by the RsaI enzyme. (B) Restriction profiles generated by the BfaI enzyme. CTC 192 is a citrus sample. MW: molecular marker PhiX174 digested with HaeIII. Fragment size (nt) from top to bottom: 1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, 281, 271, 234, 194, 118, and 72. Phytoplasmas used for comparison are: 16SrV-A, elm yellows (EY) ‘Ca. P. ulmi ‘(GenBank accession number: AY197655); 16SrV-B, jujube witches’ broom (JWB-G1) ‘Ca. P. ziziphi ‘(GenBank accession number: AB052876); 16SrV-C, “flavescence dorée” (FD-C) (GenBank accession number: X76560); 16SrV-D, “flavescence dorée” (FD-D) (GenBank accession number: AJ548787); 16SrV-E, rubus stunt (RuS) ‘Ca. P. rubi ‘(GenBank accession number: AY197648); 16SrV-G, Korean jujube witches’ broom (GenBank accession number: AB052879).
Pathogens 11 00048 g002
Pathogens 11 00048 g003 550
Figure 3. In silico RFLP profiles of phytoplasmas in the subgroups of 16SrXIII ribosomal group. (A) Restriction profiles generated by the KpnI enzyme. (B) Restriction profiles generated by the RsaI enzyme. CTC 192 citrus sample. MW: molecular marker PhiX174 digested with HaeIII. Fragment size (nt) from top to bottom: 1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, 281, 271, 234, 194, 118, and 72. Phytoplasmas used for comparison: 16SrXIII-A, Mexican periwinkle virescence (MPV) ‘Ca. P. hispanicum’ (GenBank accession number: AF248960); 16SrXIII-B, strawberry green petal (STRAWB2) (GenBank accession number: U96616); 16SrXIII-C, Chinaberry yellows (CBY1) (GenBank accession number: AF495882); 16SrXIII-D, Mexican potato purple top (SINPV) (GenBank accession number: FJ914647); 16SrXIII-E, papaya apical curl necrosis (PACN) (GenBank accession number: EU719111); 16SrXIII-F strawberry red leaf (GenBank accession number: KJ921641); 16SrXIII-G, Chinaberry yellowing (ChTY) ‘Ca. P. meliae ‘(GenBank accession number: KU850940); 16SrXIII-H broccoli stunt phytoplasma (GenBank accession number: JX626329); 16SrXIII-I Mexican periwinkle virescence phytoplasma (GenBank accession number: KT444664).
Figure 3. In silico RFLP profiles of phytoplasmas in the subgroups of 16SrXIII ribosomal group. (A) Restriction profiles generated by the KpnI enzyme. (B) Restriction profiles generated by the RsaI enzyme. CTC 192 citrus sample. MW: molecular marker PhiX174 digested with HaeIII. Fragment size (nt) from top to bottom: 1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, 281, 271, 234, 194, 118, and 72. Phytoplasmas used for comparison: 16SrXIII-A, Mexican periwinkle virescence (MPV) ‘Ca. P. hispanicum’ (GenBank accession number: AF248960); 16SrXIII-B, strawberry green petal (STRAWB2) (GenBank accession number: U96616); 16SrXIII-C, Chinaberry yellows (CBY1) (GenBank accession number: AF495882); 16SrXIII-D, Mexican potato purple top (SINPV) (GenBank accession number: FJ914647); 16SrXIII-E, papaya apical curl necrosis (PACN) (GenBank accession number: EU719111); 16SrXIII-F strawberry red leaf (GenBank accession number: KJ921641); 16SrXIII-G, Chinaberry yellowing (ChTY) ‘Ca. P. meliae ‘(GenBank accession number: KU850940); 16SrXIII-H broccoli stunt phytoplasma (GenBank accession number: JX626329); 16SrXIII-I Mexican periwinkle virescence phytoplasma (GenBank accession number: KT444664).
Pathogens 11 00048 g003
Pathogens 11 00048 g004 550
Figure 4. Symptoms of leaf yellowing in the citrus samples resulted positive for 16SrV-A phytoplasmas. (A) Orange CTC 192. (B) Lemon CTC 199. (C) Mandarin CTC 200. (D) Orange CTC 202.
Figure 4. Symptoms of leaf yellowing in the citrus samples resulted positive for 16SrV-A phytoplasmas. (A) Orange CTC 192. (B) Lemon CTC 199. (C) Mandarin CTC 200. (D) Orange CTC 202.
Pathogens 11 00048 g004
Pathogens 11 00048 g005 550
Figure 5. Symptoms in citrus associated with the 16SrXIII-F phytoplasma presence. (A) CTC 170, orange plant with generalized yellowing and untimely flowering. (B) CTC 134, mandarin plant with threadlike leaves and witches’ broom.
Figure 5. Symptoms in citrus associated with the 16SrXIII-F phytoplasma presence. (A) CTC 170, orange plant with generalized yellowing and untimely flowering. (B) CTC 134, mandarin plant with threadlike leaves and witches’ broom.
Pathogens 11 00048 g005
Table
Table 1. List of phytoplasma strains used for the phylogenetic analyses.
Table 1. List of phytoplasma strains used for the phylogenetic analyses.
16Sr GroupSubgroupAssociated Disease (‘Ca. Phytoplasma’ Species)AcronymGenBank Accession Number
SSU12p16S rRNA
16SrIAAster yellows witches’ broom AYWBCP000061
BOnion yellows mild strain OY-MNC_005303
BPrimrose virescencePRIVAMT161512AY265210
CClover phyllodyKVEMT161514AY265217
FAster yellows from apricot A-AYMT161515AY265211
16SrIIAPeanut witches’ broomPnWBAMWZ00000000
AEchinacea purpurea witches’ broomE. purpurea WBLKAC00000000
CFaba bean phyllodyFBPMT161516EF193354
DTomato big budTBBMT161517EF193359
16SrIIIAPeach × disease (‘Ca. P. pruni’)CXLHCF00000000
BItalian clover phyllodyItClPhAKIM00000000
DGoldenrod yellowsGRMT161522FJ376627
HPoinsettia branch inducingPoiBIAKIK00000000
JPhytoplasma Vc33Vc33LLKK00000000
16SrVAElm yellows (‘Ca. P. ulmi’)EYMT161527AY197655
16SrVIAClover proliferationCP1MT161528HQ589189
16SrVIIAAsh yellows (‘Ca. P. fraxini’)ASHYMT161529HQ589190
16SrIXBAlmond witches’ broom (‘Ca. P. phoenicium’)SA213JPSQ00000000
CPicris echioides yellowsPEYMT161530JQ868441
16SrXAApple proliferation (‘Ca. P. mali’)ATCU469464
BEuropean stone fruit yellows (‘Ca. P. prunorum’)ESFYMT161533AM933142
CPear decline (‘Ca. P. pyri’)PDMT161535AJ542543
16SrXIIA“stolbur” (‘Ca. P. solani’)STOL SA-1MPBG00000000
BAustral. grapev. yellows (‘Ca. P. australiense’)AUSGYAM422018
CStrawberry lethal yellowsCPACP002548
16SrXIIIFFragaria × ananassa phyllodyStrPh-CL1MT161538MH939191
KFragaria × ananassa phyllodyStrPh-CL2MT161539MH939192
KFragaria × ananassa phyllodyStrPh-CL4MT161541MH939194
16SrVACitrus × sinensis Lane late yellowsCTC192OL690419OL677628
16SrXIIIFCitrus × sinensis Fukumoto witches’ broomCTC170OL690418OL672243
Table
Table 2. Detail of citrus samples positive to phytoplasmas.
Table 2. Detail of citrus samples positive to phytoplasmas.
SampleSpecies and VarietyRegion and LocalityPhytoplasma Detected
(Ribosomal Subgroup)
CTC 182Citrus reticulata MurcottMetropolitana (Pomaire)16SrV-A
CTC 184Citrus reticulata MurcottMetropolitana (Pomaire)16SrV-A
CTC 188Citrus reticulata MurcottMetropolitana (Pomaire)16SrV-A
CTC 190Citrus × limon Fino 49Metropolitana (Pomaire)16SrV-A
CTC 192Citrus × sinensis Lane lateMetropolitana (Pomaire)16SrV-A
CTC 193Citrus × sinensis Lane lateMetropolitana (Pomaire)16SrV-A
CTC 199Citrus × limon EurekaMetropolitana (Mallarauco)16SrV-A
CTC 200Citrus reticulata MurcottMetropolitana (Mallarauco)16SrV-A
CTC 202Citrus × sinensis ValenciaMetropolitana (Mallarauco)16SrV-A
CTC 203Citrus × limon EurekaMetropolitana (Mallarauco)16SrV-A
CTC 207Citrus reticulata MurcottMetropolitana (Mallarauco)16SrV-A
CTC 212Citrus reticulata MurcottMetropolitana (Mallarauco)16SrV-A
CTC 134Citrus reticulata OrriL. B. O’Higgins (Peumo)16SrXIII-F
CTC 170Citrus × sinensis FukumotoL. B. O’Higgins (Pichidegua)16SrXIII-F
Table
Table 3. Number of citrus plants collected in the main producing regions of Chile.
Table 3. Number of citrus plants collected in the main producing regions of Chile.
RegionNumber of Samples
Tarapacá10
Coquimbo60
Valparaíso55
Metropolitana62
Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins49
Maule22
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quiroga, N.; Gamboa, C.; Medina, G.; Contaldo, N.; Torres, F.; Bertaccini, A.; Zamorano, A.; Fiore, N. Survey for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ in Citrus in Chile. Pathogens 2022, 11, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11010048

AMA Style

Quiroga N, Gamboa C, Medina G, Contaldo N, Torres F, Bertaccini A, Zamorano A, Fiore N. Survey for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ in Citrus in Chile. Pathogens. 2022; 11(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11010048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quiroga, Nicolas, Camila Gamboa, Gabriela Medina, Nicoletta Contaldo, Fernando Torres, Assunta Bertaccini, Alan Zamorano, and Nicola Fiore. 2022. "Survey for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ in Citrus in Chile" Pathogens 11, no. 1: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11010048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop