Next Article in Journal
Current Susceptibility Surveillance and Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance in N. gonorrheae within WHO Regions
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression of Cytokine Profiles in Human THP-1 Cells during Phase Transition of Talaromyces marneffei
Previous Article in Journal
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Transmission in High-Incidence Settings—New Paradigms and Insights
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/pathogens11111227
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection: What Is Known?

by
Carlos Alberto Castro-Fuentes
1,
María del Rocío Reyes-Montes
1,
María Guadalupe Frías-De-León
2,
Omar E. Valencia-Ledezma
2,
Gustavo Acosta-Altamirano
2 and
Esperanza Duarte-Escalante
1,*
1
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
2
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca, Carretera Federal México-Puebla Km. 34.5, Pueblo de Zoquiapan, Ixtapaluca 56530, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(11), 1227; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111227
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Opportunistic Fungal Infections)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has had a high incidence. In addition, it has been associated with prolonged hospital stays, as well as several predisposing risk factors, such as fungal factors (nosocomial organism, the size of the conidia, and the ability of the Aspergillus spp. of colonizing the respiratory tract), environmental factors (remodeling in hospitals, use of air conditioning and negative pressure in intensive care units), comorbidities, and immunosuppressive therapies. In addition to these factors, SARS-CoV-2 per se is associated with significant dysfunction of the patient’s immune system, involving both innate and acquired immunity, with reduced CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts and cytokine storm. Therefore, this review aims to identify the factors influencing the fungus so that coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 can occur. In addition, we analyze the predisposing factors in the fungus, host, and the immune response alteration due to the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 that causes the development of CAPA.

1. Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, in groups of patients with pneumonia of unknown etiology. In January 2020, it was determined that the causal agent of this pathology was a new coronavirus allocated in the genus Betacoronavirus, which received the name SARS-CoV-2 because it was recognized as a sister clade to SARS-CoV [1]. On 11 February 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially named the outbreak of coronavirus disease as Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) [2]. Since the emergence of COVID-19, it has become a pandemic due to its high prevalence and rapid transmission [3]. It has been diagnosed in hundreds of millions of individuals and has killed millions worldwide [4].
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is composed of positive-sense single-stranded RNA, with a genome size of 27–32 kb. The virus has four main structural proteins, the spike protein (S), membrane (M), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N), which are necessary for the regulation of viral function and structure. The N protein helps the virus form the capsid and the entire viral structure correctly, while the S protein promotes the virus’s adherence to the host cell. The S protein consists of a large external domain, a single-channel transmembrane anchor, and a short intracellular tail. These three regions can precisely anchor the host cell. In these segments, the external domain contains two subunits, the receptor binding subunit S1 and the membrane fusion subunit S2. These subunits are located in the trimer-nail or crown structure, which is why it is named coronavirus [5,6,7]. SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein S is cleaved by transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), producing two surface proteins, S1 and S2 [8].
It is known that in several coronaviruses, the S glycoprotein is cleaved at the boundary between the S1 and S2 subunits, which remain non-covalently bound in the prefusion conformation. The distal S1 subunit comprises the receptor binding domains, which contribute to the stabilization of the prefusion state of the S2 subunit, anchored to the membrane containing the fusion machinery [9].
The virus binds to the host cell via the S1 domain through the receptor-binding domain (RBD). It attaches to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to promote viral fusion and release the viral genome in host cells, which is necessary for producing new virions. Furthermore, it is known that the ACE2 receptor can be found on type II lung alveolar cells, small intestinal enterocytes, arterial and venous endothelial cells, and arterial smooth muscle cells in most organs [1].
Therefore, the virus has harmful effects, such as direct damage to pulmonary and extrapulmonary tissues, and the dysregulation of the immune response [10]. In addition, COVID-19 may be accompanied by infections caused by other microorganisms, including fungi, especially the Aspergillus genus [11,12].
In the last three years, there has been a significant increase in the incidence of aspergillosis among patients with COVID-19. Such an increase is due to lymphopenia and defective lymphocyte function, as well as hyperinflammatory reactions caused by systemic cytokines, which are associated with COVID-19 [13]. Likewise, the use of dexamethasone (DXM) for the treatment of COVID-19 patients causes immunosuppression [14], creating an additional risk factor for superinfections in these patients [15]. Likewise, it has been shown that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection are affected by COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). However, Lai and Yu [16] mentioned that conventional risk factors for aspergillosis are not present in patients with CAPA.
Cases of CAPA have been reported since the start of the pandemic [17,18,19,20,21]. Table 1 shows the identified species of Aspergillus associated with CAPA in different parts of the world.
The reported incidence rate of CAPA among COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) varies widely, from 2.4% to 35% [48,49]. However, the incidence of CAPA remains unclear [48,50,51]. In general, the incidence of CAPA has been higher in Europe than in North America. The variations in reported incidence may be due to several factors: host factors (ethnic and genomic aspects), environmental factors (facility ventilation systems, building materials, and nearby construction), and variations in clinical definitions and diagnostic approaches across institutions (including galactomannan (GM) testing and performance of bronchoscopy) [48,50,51].
On the other hand, in addition to immunosuppression, SARS-CoV-2 infection can also play an essential role in increasing susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis.
Thus, this review aims to identify which factors influence the fungus coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and analyze the predisposing factors in the fungus, host, and the immune response alteration due to the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 that cause the development of CAPA.

2. Aspergillus Features Influencing Susceptibility to COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA) Development

Aspergillus genus has unique characteristics that contribute to a higher incidence of CAPA. For instance, it is a ubiquitous saprophytic fungus to which humans are exposed daily in most parts of the world. Aspergillus is considered a nosocomial agent; however, there is no current uniform definition of what constitutes nosocomial aspergillosis. One of the main reasons for defining hospital-acquired aspergillosis is that the incubation period for Aspergillus is unknown [52]. In addition, the prolonged period of immunosuppression in high-risk patients, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, as well as frequent hospital admissions and discharges, make it challenging to determine whether exposure to Aspergillus spores occurred during hospitalization or within the hospital setting. However, an invasive disease that occurs after one week of hospitalization is considered nosocomial. The most frequent nosocomial source of Aspergillus infection is contaminated air. Inhalation of airborne Aspergillus conidia is critical for infection [53]. Concentrations of A. fumigatus conidia in the environment are estimated to range from 1 to 100 conidia/m3. On average, an adult is likely to inhale more than 100 conidia per day [54]. Due to the relatively small size of the A. fumigatus conidia (2–3.5 µm), it has been widely assumed that these spores can reach the small airways and alveoli, a fundamental feature for their pathogenesis, making the alveoli the primary site of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) [54,55,56,57,58]. Therefore, the continuous exposure of the fungus to local environmental conditions contributes to the invasion of the airways of critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Likewise, host exposure to A. fumigatus conidia occurs frequently; however, the immune response in immunocompetent hosts is effective in removing them from the respiratory tract. In contrast, people with respiratory diseases, such as COVID-19 patients, are more likely to be colonized by Aspergillus during their hospital stay than those admitted for other reasons [59]. The ability of the Aspergillus spp. to colonize the airways is the first stage in the pathogenesis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Colonization may be due to the special characteristics that patients have when they are admitted to the hospital; one of these differences is a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), with a median of 14 days compared to 2 days in non-COVID-19 patients. The permanence of the patients in these areas is influenced by the fact that aspergillosis is acquired through the air, and the risk is related to the concentration of conidia in the air, a phenomenon determined by factors responsible for the release of conidia into the atmosphere as the presence of organic matter, deterioration of ventilation and air conditioning systems, heat and noise insulation material, and construction and demolition work in areas near or inside the hospital. Another factor related to the ability of Aspergillus spp. to colonize airways is the use of negative-pressure rooms [60]. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, it was recommended to place negative or normal pressure in intensive care wards to protect medical staff and patients. However, two recent studies reported a high incidence (26.3–33%) of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients infected with COVID-19 in rooms with negative pressure [17]. For this reason, Ichai et al. [61] showed that negative pressure in ICU wards could be the source of Aspergillus air contamination and thus increase the risk of opportunistic infections. When a switch was made to neutral or slightly positive pressure in the rooms, combined with environmental standards, cleaning protocols, and prophylactic antifungal treatments, Aspergillus was eradicated from room air. Contaminated respiratory equipment (humidifiers, nebulizers, oxygen canisters), which can be a source of infections, have also been investigated as potential sources of fungi in healthcare settings [62]. Likewise, in ICU patients with SARS-CoV-2 receiving dexamethasone (DXM) therapy, colonization by A. fumigatus (positive culture in tracheal aspirate) has been observed, and as a result these patients could be predisposed to develop CAPA, since steroids can create a favorable local environment for the in situ growth of A. fumigatus [63].

3. Host Factors Affecting Susceptibility to CAPA Development

Currently, the host risk factors associated with CAPA are not well understood. However, several studies include among the most critical factors the severity of COVID-19, age, previous respiratory diseases, chronic renal failure, chronic use of corticosteroids, neutropenia, and the prolonged treatment with corticosteroids or tocilizumab for COVID-19, in addition to thrombocytopenia, use of vasopressors before CAPA diagnosis, and the use of methylprednisolone at a daily dose of ≥40 mg, which is more likely to develop CAPA, as well as treatment with azithromycin [27,64,65,66,67]. Likewise, Dimopoulos et al. [67], in a review of papers published up to January 2021, describe the incidence of CAPA and associated comorbidities, suggesting that most CAPA cases occur essentially in severe COVID-19 patients.
In addition, pneumonia caused by viruses is known to increase patients’ susceptibility to bacterial and fungal coinfections, including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), since respiratory viruses cause direct damage to the respiratory tract epithelium and make it difficult to eliminate the fungus through the ciliary system, which allows Aspergillus to invade the tissue. Furthermore, this leads to immune dysfunction or dysregulation, locally or systemically. Similarly, the degree of dysregulation associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has shown that some patients develop marked immunosuppression, facilitating bacterial and fungal coinfection [13,68,69,70].

3.1. Comorbidities

In general, critically ill patients admitted to the ICU with comorbidities seem more susceptible to CAPA. This is very rare in non-severe cases, so the severity of COVID-19 is considered a risk factor. Among the most frequent comorbidities associated with CAPA are advanced age, diabetes, pulmonary diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and solid organ malignancy [49,71,72]. However, other comorbidities associated with CAPA are also mentioned, including obesity, chronic respiratory diseases, and asthma [49].
Likewise, Gregoire et al. [64] cite other factors associated with CAPA, such as structural lung defects, severe lung damage during the course of COVID-19, and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. In addition, the authors found that patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease and hypertension also had a marked trend associated with CAPA [65]. Sagris et al. [73] have suggested a likely explanation for the increased severity of ischemic stroke observed in COVID-19 patients; the authors mention that a possible direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the brain may have a causal relationship with local brain ischemia and inflammation, in addition to brain tissue death, which causes, as a result, an excessive release of DAMP (damage associated molecular patterns), which in turn causes localized and global inflammation, and promotes the disruption of the blood–brain barrier. Thus, during the hyperinflammatory state of COVID-19, the overproduction of proinflammatory acute response proteins and adhesion molecules, together with activated circulating leukocytes, may result in the increase of the local inflammatory process in the ischemic brain. Although there are still not enough published statistical data, coinfections in SARS-CoV-2 patients have revealed that a significant number of hospitalized patients have developed secondary systemic mycoses, including aspergillosis, which cause serious complications, and even death. In severe cases, the risk of developing invasive fungal infections is high; this is not only due to the clinical situation of the patient and the need for invasive care, but also due to the immunological alterations caused by SARS-CoV-2 [74].
They also report that patients under treatment with immunosuppressants, as well as treatment with azithromycin (AZT) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and DXM, showed a significant association with CAPA. They highlight that AZT has an immunomodulatory effect as it can inhibit neutrophils and the innate immune response, lowering the immune defense against Aspergillus. Further, its broad-spectrum antibiotic effect could alter the patients’ microbiota, thus promoting colonization by Aspergillus. In these patients, clusters of microbiomes have been observed to grow in the gut due to lymphopenia caused by infection [75].
Likewise, the use of corticosteroids to treat severe COVID-19 constitutes another risk factor associated with CAPA [71]. One study shows that long-term steroid treatment in doses greater than or equal to 16 mg/day of prednisone for at least 15 days was significantly more frequent in patients with CAPA than those without CAPA [23,76]. However, some studies have found no association between the use of these and the incidence of hospital-acquired fungal infections in patients with COVID-19. Feys et al. [71] and Salazar et al. [77] mention that the discrepancies can be attributed to the different cumulative doses of corticosteroids or the lack of statistical power to analyze the data.
The advanced age of COVID-19 patients shows significant implications for their immune systems. The most evident effect in elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases is that, due to the aging of their immune system, the imbalance within their innate and adaptive immune response generally worsens, causing a decrease in lymphocytes and an uncontrollable inflammatory reaction due to a cytokine storm. The result is an inadequate immune response, a lack of effective immune memory, and an inability to clear the virus. In addition, it causes injury to the lung epithelium and microvascular endothelium throughout the body, thus leading to ARDS and microvascular thrombosis, which could eventually favor the entry and development of Aspergillus, leading to high mortality among the elderly COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular diseases [78,79,80].
Additionally, various studies have shown a greater severity of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes mellitus. It is mentioned that patients infected with COVID-19 could predispose individuals to hyperglycemia, and by interacting with other risk factors, hyperglycemia could modulate the immune and inflammatory responses, predisposing patients to severe COVID-19 [81,82,83].
Furthermore, a study published by Sudhakar et al. [84] highlights obesity as a significant comorbidity in COVID-19 patients since it is a metabolic disorder with a deregulated immune and endocrine function, inferring that dysfunctional metabolism contributes to the fact that the mechanisms behind obesity are a risk factor with adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. The authors suggest that, in obese individuals, visceral adiposity expansion (VAT) leads to metabolic dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, immune cell infiltration, macrophage polarization to a pro-inflammatory phenotype, adipocyte cell death, and inflammation. It is also associated with the altered expression of adipokines and cytokines that cause systemic effects and dysfunction of endocrine and metabolic organs. They note that such a state of adipose tissue, particularly associated with multiple organs such as the lungs, vasculature, heart, and kidneys, may predispose obese subjects to adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection.
In a large meta-analysis study by Wang et al. [85], evidence showed that COVID-19 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a risk of progression 5.9 times higher than patients without COPD. They also identified a higher risk of worsening in people with hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease, suggesting an opportunity for coinfections, including Aspergillus.
It is essential to mention that the comorbidities associated with the risk of acquiring CAPA are variable and depend on each study. Table 2 shows the main comorbidities related to CAPA, according to a review by Dimopoulos et al. [67], in different countries.

3.2. Changes in the Immune Response That Predispose to CAPA

Currently, there is no consensus to clearly define the risk factors associated with CAPA, and the results published to date should be taken with caution, since many studies are still under investigation. In addition, the variability in the diagnostic criteria used for the diagnosis of CAPA could lead to overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and overestimation of the true risk factors and associated outcomes, so significant predictors and prognostic factors may have been ruled out due to a lack of analyzed data [86].
It is known that influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) and CAPA share certain characteristics; however, IAPA has a higher incidence, most cases are observed in the first 48 h in the ICU, and it is more aggressive than CAPA. Moreover, the mechanism by which the intrinsic immune dysregulation caused by the influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 occurs is unknown [71]. Recently, some hypotheses of the pathophysiology have been proposed that can explain the development of CAPA. The first hypothesis is related to the dysfunctional response of IFN (interferon) type I and III in severe COVID-19 patients (Figure 1), which has a fundamental role against Aspergillus spp., by promoting the response of type 1 T-helper cells against the fungus and driving type III IFN production, causing neutrophils to act against A. fumigatus [71]. The second hypothesis is related to IFN deregulation, together with cell exhaustion, particularly of alveolar macrophages, since they are the first cells to recognize inhaled conidia, being another possible cause of invasion by Aspergillus spp.
In IAPA, it is known that the effectiveness of phagocytosis against Aspergillus spp., associated with LC3 (Light Chain 3B) (which is a pathway for phagosome–lysosome fusion), is altered by the use of corticosteroids such as dexamethasone, hindering the activity of alveolar macrophages and consequently the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 [87]; this alteration can also predispose the host to acquire CAPA [71]. Moreover, it is known that in severe cases of COVID-19, as well as in aspergillosis caused by A. fumigatus [88], in addition to CAPA, there are elevated levels of IL-6, which contributes to an increase in lung damage. Particularly in CAPA, tocilizumab (IL-6 receptor antagonist) has been used to reduce its expression; however, its administration has not shown efficacy in resolving the disease since it does not regulate the basal production of this cytokine and prevents the Th17 protective response and effector functions of phagocytes [13,16,35,77].
Other risk factors that predispose to CAPA are deregulation of the renin-angiotensin system and/or the kallikrein-kinin system produced by the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor; however, its mechanism is unknown [13]. As part of the innate immune response, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS), damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS), and pattern recognition receptors (PRR) are present in macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils, and constitute the first line of defense against the virus. In this sense, a risk factor is due to cellular deterioration caused in NK cells, whose function is the direct elimination of fungal pathogens and stimulation of other cells such as neutrophils [89], which has been related to increased susceptibility to co-infections [77]. Platelets represent another predisposing factor since they are considered key regulators of the innate immune response, and it has been shown that an increase in the platelet count is associated with the severity of the disease in patients with COVID-19. This is due to the fact that platelets express ACE2; furthermore, in vitro exposure to SARS-CoV-2 has been observed to potentiate platelet activation and aggregation, resulting in vascular complications seen in patients with COVID-19 and increased susceptibility to co-infections [77].
Moreover, the production of IL-1β in high concentrations leads to a pro-inflammatory environment, making fungal pathogenesis permissible. This is due to the production of DAMPS, which are proposed as a possible immunomodulatory strategy in CAPA because they promote and exacerbate the immune and inflammatory response leading to lung injury, particularly due to an increase in the inflammatory reaction in experimental aspergillosis [13], predisposing COVID-19 patients to secondary Aspergillus infection.
Another host susceptibility factor is lymphopenia, which, together with the pro-inflammatory environment and the cytosine storm, can have an impact on the functionality and efficacy of the immune response [90], which leads to, as a result, the development of CAPA in individuals who present some type of comorbidity. Although efforts have allowed us to learn a little more about this coinfection, the pathophysiological processes that originate it have yet to be discovered.

3.3. Influence of Antifungals on the Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 Interaction

In invasive aspergillosis (AI), it is known that early intervention with an appropriate antifungal agent can contribute to patient improvement, so the use of voriconazole is recommended as the first line of defense [13]. Voriconazole has been widely used in CAPA; however, the interaction between voriconazole and drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and protease inhibitors, such as lopinavir/ritonavir) has been reported to cause cardiac events [91,92]. As a result, the treatment is not effective for patients [93], demonstrating its low effectiveness, which has also been reported for itraconazole [13].
Furthermore, Aspergillus fumigatus and A. flavus are the opportunistic pathogens most commonly reported as etiological agents of CAPA [16]. Likewise, it is known that A. flavus has less sensitivity to voriconazole, amphotericin B, and 5-fluorocytosine [94], so the use of a single antifungal is not the best approach to show good results; particularly in the case of CAPA, the combination with other antifungals is promising [95]. Moreover, antifungals such as isavuconazole show a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and the toxicity is lower compared to voriconazole [13]. However, more studies are required to evaluate the usefulness of isavuconazole in CAPA.
Echinocandins have also been used for the treatment of CAPA, particularly caspofungin, which produced better results in these patients [96]. In addition, it is proposed that its use can prevent fungal infections and reduce severe cases of COVID-19, mainly in patients with hematological malignancies and who are in the ICU [97].
Due to the resistance to antifungals of some species of Aspergillus spp., clinical trials of new antifungals are currently being studied as therapeutic tools, which can be very useful in treating CAPA [98]. These antifungals include opelconazole, fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, olorofim, and rezafungin [71]. However, most are in phase III, so they are not yet available on the market. In addition, the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in the first days of stay of COVID-19 patients in the ICU has been evaluated, highlighting the efficiency of prophylaxis with posaconazole, which allows the reduction of CAPA cases by >90% [99]. No significant impact on survival was demonstrated; however, it could be considered an option since the drug–drug interaction, as occurs with voriconazole, is less due to the fact that it is metabolized by a different pathway.

4. Conclusions

It has been shown that the incidence of CAPA is influenced by several elements, including host factors, Aspergillus intrinsic features, aspects caused by SARS-CoV-2, and environmental components. Among the main host risk factors for acquiring CAPA are the severity of COVID-19, age, previous respiratory diseases, chronic renal failure, chronic use of corticosteroids, neutropenia, and prolonged treatment with corticosteroids or tocilizumab for COVID-19. In addition, thrombocytopenia, using vasopressors before CAPA diagnosis, using methylprednisolone, and treatment with azithromycin are also relevant aspects, as are relevant comorbidities.
Additionally, the main aspects of the fungus associated with CAPA are its ubiquity, the fact that it is considered a nosocomial organism, the size of its conidia, and the ability of Aspergillus spp. to colonize the respiratory tract.
Likewise, the environmental factors associated with CAPA are renovations of hospital facilities, the use of air conditioning, and negative pressure in intensive care units. Finally, the respiratory viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 produces multiple lung changes that create deregulation of the host’s immune system, facilitating the invasion of Aspergillus, which results in CAPA.
Despite a large number of CAPA cases in the literature, there is little information about the factors involved in the Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 interaction. Therefore, it is necessary to expand studies to elucidate the host’s role and the microorganisms participating in CAPA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.C.-F., E.D.-E. and M.d.R.R.-M.; investigation, C.A.C.-F., E.D.-E., M.d.R.R.-M., M.G.F.-D.-L., O.E.V.-L., G.A.-A. and E.D.-E.; writing—original draft preparation C.A.C.-F., E.D.-E., M.d.R.R.-M., M.G.F.-D.-L., O.E.V.-L., G.A.-A. and E.D.-E.; writing—review and editing, C.A.C.-F., E.D.-E., M.d.R.R.-M., M.G.F.-D.-L., O.E.V.-L., G.A.-A. and E.D.-E.; supervision, E.D.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (PAPIIT-DGAPA), grant number IT201318.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank Carlos Uriel Torres Estrella for the elaboration of the figure.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Borges-Vélez, G.; Rosario-Rodriguez, L.J.; Rosado-Philippi, J.E.; Cartagena, L.J.; Garcia-Requena, L.; Gonzalez, A.; Perez, J.; Melendez, M.L. SARS-CoV-2: Biology, detection, macrophage mediated pathogenesis and potential treatments. Virol. Immunol. J. 2020, 4, 242. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, P.; Lu, X.; Xu, C.; Sun, W.; Pan, B. Understanding of COVID-19 based on current evidence. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Naserghandi, A.; Allameh, S.; Saffarpour, R. All about COVID-19 in brief. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 35, 100678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Worldometers. Info. Dover, Delaware, USA. 2022. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  5. Tortorici, M.A.; Veesler, D. Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv. Virus Res. 2019, 105, 93–116. [Google Scholar]
  6. Podder, S.; Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, T. Mutations in membrane-fusion subunit of spike glycoprotein play crucial role in the recent outbreak of COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 93, 2790–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, H.; Yang, J.; Zhou, C.; Chen, B.; Fang, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L. A Review of SARS-CoV2: Compared with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 628370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Canedo-Marroquín, G.; Saavedra, F.; Andrade, C.A.; Berrios, R.V.; Rodríguez-Guilarte, L.; Opazo, M.C.; Riedel, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M. SARS-CoV-2: Immune response elicited by infection and development of vaccines and treatments. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 569760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Walls, A.C.; Park, J.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, function, and dntigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 180, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elrobaa, I.H.; New, K.J. COVID-19: Pulmonary and extra pulmonary manifestations. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 711616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lansbury, L.; Lim, B.; Baskaran, V.; Lim, W.S. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, A.; Narayan, R.K.; Prasoon, P.; Kumari, C.; Kaur, G.; Kumar, S.; Kulandhasamy, M.; Sesham, K.; Pareek, V.; Faiq, M.A.; et al. COVID-19 mechanisms in the human body—What we know so far. Front Immunol. 2021, 3, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arastehfar, A.; Carvalho, A.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Jenks, J.D.; Koehler, P.; Krause, R.; Cornely, O.A.; SPerlin, D.; Lass-Flör, C.; Hoenig, M. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA)-From Immunology to Treatment. J. Fungi Basel Switz. 2020, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Horby, P.; Lim, W.; Emberson, J.; Mafham, M.; Bell, J.; Linsell, L.; Staplin, N.; Brightling, C.; Ustianowski, A.; Elmahi, E.; et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 693–704. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis, R.; Kontoyiannis, D. Invasive aspergillosis in glucocorticoid-treated patients. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, S271–S281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lai, C.C.; Yu, W.L. Covid-19 associated with pulmonary aspergillosis: A literature review. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 54, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alanio, A.; Delliere, S.; Fodil, S.; Bretagne, S.; Megarbane, B. Prevalence of putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with COVID19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020, 8, e48–e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koehler, P.; Cornely, O.A.; Böttiger, B.W.; Dusse, F.; Eichenauer, D.A.; Fuchs, F.; Hallek, M.; Jung, N.; Klein, F.; Persigehl, T.; et al. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 2020, 63, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Salmanton-García, J.; Sprute, R.; Stemler, J.; Bartoletti, M.; Dupont, D.; Valerio, M.; García Vidal, C.; Falces-Romero, I.; Machado, M.; de la Villa, S.; et al. COVID-19–Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis, March–August 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schein, F.; Munoz-Pons, H.; Mahinc, C.; Grange, R.; Cathébras, P.; Flori, P. Fatal aspergillosis complicating severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case report. J. Mycol. Med. 2020, 30, 101039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van Arkel, A.L.E.; Rijpstra, T.A.; Belderbos, H.N.A.; van Wijngaarden, P.; Verweij, P.E.; Bentvelsen, R.G. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Antinori, S.; Rech, R.; Galimberti, L.; Castelli, A.; Angeli, E.; Fossali, T.; Bernasconi, D.; Covizzi, A.; Bonazzetti, C.; Torre, A.; et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A diagnostic challenge. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 38, 101752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bartoletti, M.; Pascale, R.; Cricca, M.; Rinaldi, M.; Maccaro, A.; Bussini, L.; Fornaro, G.; Tonetti, T.; Pizzilli, G.; Francalanci, E.; et al. Epidemiology of invasive pulmonary Aspergillosis among intubated patients with COVID-19: A prospective study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e3606–e3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blaize, M.; Mayaux, J.; Nabet, C.; Lampros, A.; Marcelin, A.G.; Thellier, M.; Piarroux, R.; Demoule, A.; Fekkar, A. Fatal invasive aspergillosis and coronavirus disease in an immunocompetent patient. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1636–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Borman, A.M.; Palmer, M.D.; Fraser, M.; Patterson, Z.; Mann, C.; Oliver, D.; Linton, C.J.; Gough, M.; Brown, P.; Dzietczyk, A.; et al. COVID-19-Associated invasive aspergillosis: Data from the UK National Mycology Reference Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e02136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chauvet, P.; Mallat, J.; Arumadura, C.; Vangrunderbeek, N.; Dupre, C.; Pauquet, P.; Orfi, A.; Granier, M.; Lemyze, M. Risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Explor. 2020, 2, e0244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dellière, S.; Dudoignon, E.; Fodil, S.; Voicu, S.; Collet, M.; Oillic, P.A.; Salmona, M.; Dépret, F.; Ghelfenstein-Ferreira, T.; Plaud, B.; et al. Risk factors associated with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in ICU patients: A French multicentric retrospective cohort. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 27, 790.e1–790.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dupont, D.; Menotti, J.; Turc, J.; Miossec, C.; Wallet, F.; Richard, J.C.; Argaud, L.; Paulus, S.; Wallon, M.; Ader, F.; et al. Pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Med. Mycol. 2020, 59, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghelfenstein-Ferreira, T.; Saade, A.; Alanio, A.; Bretagne, S.; de Castro, R.A.; Hamane, S.; Azoulay, E.; Bredin, S.; Dellieère, S. Recovery of a triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in respiratory specimen of COVID-19 patient in ICU-A case report. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 31, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gangneux, J.P.; Reizine, F.; Guegan, H.; Pinceaux, K.; Le Balch, P.; Prat, E.; Pelletier, R.; Belaz, S.; Le Souhaitier, M.; Le Tulzo, Y.; et al. Is the COVID-19 pandemic a good time to include Aspergillus molecular detection to categorize aspergillosis in ICU patients? A monocentric experience. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Helleberg, M.; Steensen, M.; Arendrup, M.C. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 147–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lahmer, T.; Kriescher, S.; Herner, A.; Rothe, K.; Spinner, C.D.; Schneider, J.; Mayer, U.; Neuenhahn, M.; Hoffmann, D.; Geisler, F.; et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: Results from the prospective AspCOVID-19 study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0238825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lamoth, F.; Glampedakis, E.; Boillat-Blanco, N.; Oddo, M.; Pagani, J.L. Incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among critically ill COVID-19 patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1706–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lescure, F.X.; Bouadma, L.; Nguyen, D.; Parisey, M.; Wicky, P.H.; Behillil, S.; Gaymard, A.; Bouscambert-Duchamp, M.; Donati, F.; Le Hingrat, Q.; et al. Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: A case series. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Machado, M.; Valerio, M.; Álvarez-Uría, A.; Olmedo, M.; Veintimilla, C.; Padilla, B.; De la Villa, S.; Guinea, J.; Escribano, P.; Ruiz-Serrano, M.J.; et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in the COVID-19 era: An expected new entity. Mycoses 2020, 64, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Meijer, E.F.J.; Dofferhoff, A.S.M.; Hoiting, O.; Meis, J.F. COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis: A prospective single-center dual case series. Mycoses 2021, 64, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mohamed, A.; Hassan, T.; Trzos-Grzybowska, M.; Thomas, J.; Quinn, A.; O’Sullivan, M.; Griffin, A.; Rogers, T.R.; Talento, A.F. Multi-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection: A lethal combination. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2021, 31, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nasir, N.; Farooqi, J.; Mahmood, S.F.; Jabeen, K. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) in patients admitted with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: An observational study from Pakistan. Mycoses 2020, 63, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Prattes, J.; Valentin, T.; Hoenigl, M.; Talakic, E.; Reisinger, A.C.; Eller, P. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating COVID-19 in the ICU—A case report. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 31, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roman-Montes, C.M.; Martinez-Gamboa, A.; Diaz-Lomelí, P.; Cervantes-Sanchez, A.; Rangel-Cordero, A.; Sifuentes-Osornio, J. Accuracy of galactomannan testing on tracheal aspirates in COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 2020, 64, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rutsaert, L.; Steinfort, N.; Van Hunsel, T.; Bomans, P.; Naesens, R.; Mertes, H.; Dits, H.; Van Regenmortel, N. COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Ann. Intensive Care 2020, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Santana, M.F.; Pivoto, G.; Alexandre, M.A.A.; Baía-da-Silva, D.C.; Borba, M.G.d.S.; Val, F.A.; Brito-Sousa, J.D.; Cardoso Melo, G.; Marcelo Monteiro, W.; Braga Souza, J.V.; et al. Confirmed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and COVID-19: The value of postmortem findings to support antemortem management. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2020, 53, e20200401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Segrelles-Calvo, G.; Araújo, G.R.S.; Llopis-Pastor, E.; Carrillo, J.; Hernández-Hernández, M.; Rey, L.; Rodríguez Melean, N.; Escribano, I.; Antón, E.; Zamarro, C.; et al. Prevalence of opportunistic invasive aspergillosis in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia. Mycoses 2021, 64, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sharma, A.; Hofmeyr, A.; Bansal, A.; Thakkar, D.; Lam, L.; Harrington, Z.; Bhonagiri, D. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA): An Australian case report. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 31, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Van Biesen, S.; Kwa, D.; Bosman, R.J.; Juffermans, N.P. Detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in COVID-19 with nondirected BAL. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 1171–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vélez Pintado, M.; Camiro-Zúñiga, A.; Aguilar Soto, M.; Cuenca, D.; Mercado, M.; Crabtree-Ramirez, B.; ARMII Study Group. COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in a tertiary care center in Mexico City. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Versyck, M.; Zarrougui, W.; Lambiotte, F.; Elbeki, N.; Saint-Leger, P. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in COVID-19 critically ill patients: Results of a French monocentric cohort. J. Mycol. Med. 2021, 31, 101122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lamoth, F.; Lewis, R.E.; Walsh, T.J.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Navigating the uncertainties of COVID-19 associated aspergillosis (CAPA): A comparison with influenza associated aspergillosis (IAPA). J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 224, 1631–1640. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pasquier, G.; Bounhiol, A.; Robert Gangneux, F.; Zahar, J.; Gangneux, J.P.; Novara, A.; Bougnoux, M.; Dannaoui, E. A review of significance of Aspergillus detection in airways of ICU COVID-19 patients. Mycoses 2021, 64, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fekkar, A.; Neofytos, D.; Nguyen, M.H.; Clancy, C.J.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Lamoth, F. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA): How big a problem is it? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 1376–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kula, B.E.; Clancy, C.J.; Hong Nguyen, M.; Schwartz, I.S. Invasive mould disease in fatal COVID-19: A systematic review of autopsies. Lancet Microbe 2021, 2, e405–e414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Patterson, T.F.; Thompson, G.R.; Denning, D.W.; Fishman, J.A.; Hadley, S.; Herbrecht, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Marr, K.A.; Morrison, V.A.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Aspergillosis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e1–e60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Thompson, G.R., III; Young, J.H. Aspergillus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1496–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. O’Gorman, C. Airborne Aspergillus fumigatus conidia: A risk factor for aspergillosis. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2021, 25, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Latgé, J.P. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 310–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Brakhage, A.A.; Langfelder, K. Menacing mold: The molecular biology of Aspergillus fumigatus. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002, 56, 433–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dagenais, T.R.; Keller, N.P. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. McCormick, A.; Loeffler, J.; Ebel, F. Aspergillus fumigatus: Contours of an opportunistic human pathogen. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 1535–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Brüggemann, R.J.; Vos, S.; De Hertogh, G.; Wauters, J.; Reijers, M.H.; Netea, M.G.; Schouten, J.A.; Verweij, P.E. COVID-19-associated Aspergillus tracheobronchitis: The interplay between viral tropism, host defence, and fungal invasion. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021, 9, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fernández, P.; Morenoa, L.; Yagüea, G.; Andreu, E.; Jara, R.; Segovia, M. Colonization by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in ICU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med. Intensiva 2021, 45, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ichai, P.; Saliba, F.; Baune, P.; Daoud, A.; Coilly, A.; Samuel, D. Impact of negative air pressure in ICU rooms on the risk of pulmonary aspergillosis in COVID-19 patients. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baddley, J.W.; Thompson, G.R., III; Chen, S.C.; White, P.L.; Johnson, M.D.; Nguyen, M.H.; Schwartz, I.S.; Spec, A.; OstroskyZeichner, L.; Jackson, B.R.; et al. Coronavirus disease 2019-associated invasive fungal infection. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bellanger, A.P.; Lallemand, S.; Tumasyan Horikian, A.; Navellou, J.C.C.; Barrera, A.; Rouzet, E.; Scherer, G.; Reboux, G.; Piton, L. Millon investigation of the value of precipitins in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients with a positive marker for Aspergillus species. Med. Mycol. 2022, 60, myac031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gregoire, E.; Pirotte, B.F.; Moerman, F.; Altdorfer, A.; Gaspard, L.; Firre, E.; Moonen, M.; Fraipont, V.; Ernst, M.; Darcis, G. Incidence and risk factors of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in intensive care unit-A monocentric retrospective observational study. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, J.; Yang, X.; Lv, Z.; Zhou, T.; Liu, H.; Zou, X.; Cao, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Chen, W.; et al. Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with coronavirus disease 2019: A multicenter retrospective study. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 753659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Prattes, J.; Wauters, J.; Giacobbe, D.R.; Salmanton-García, J.; Maertens, J.; Bourgeois, M.; Reynders, M.; Rutsaert, L.; Regenmortel, N.V.; Lormans, P.; et al. Risk factors and outcome of pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients-a multinational observational study by the European Confederation of Medical Mycology. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dimopoulos, G.; Almyroudi, M.; Myrianthefs, P.; Rello, J. COVID-19-Associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). J. Intensive Med. 2021, 1, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tavakoli, M.; Shokohi, T.; Lass Florl, C.; Hedayati, M.T.; Hoenig, M. Immunological response to COVID-19 and its role as a predisposing factor in invasive aspergillosis. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2020, 6, 75–79. [Google Scholar]
  69. Feldman, C.; Anderson, R. The role of co-infections and secondary infections in patients with COVID-19. Pneumonia 2021, 13, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Koehler, P.; Bassetti, M.; Chakrabarti, A.; Chen, S.C.A.; Lopes Colombo, A.; Hoenigl, M.; Klimko, N.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Oladele, R.O.; Vinh, D.C.; et al. Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: The 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, e149–e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Feys, S.; Almyroudi, M.P.; Braspenning, R.; Lagrou, K.; Spriet, I.; Dimopoulos, G.; Wauters, J.A. Visual and comprehensive review on COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA). J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Janssen, N.A.F.; Nyga, R.; Vanderbeke, L.; Jacobs, C.; Ergün, M.; Buil, J.B.; van Dijk, K.; Altenburg, J.; Bouman, C.S.C.; van der Spoel, H.I.; et al. Multinational observational cohort study of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2892–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sagris, D.; Papanikolaou, A.; Kvernland, A.; Korompok Frontera, E.J.A.; Troxe, A.B.; Gavriatopoulou, M.; Milionis, H.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Michel, P.; Yaghi, S.; et al. COVID-19 and ischemic stroke. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 3826–3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Videla, C.G.; Agustina, M.; de la Iglesia Niveyro, P.X.; Ciarrocchi Nicolas, M. Muerte cerebral debida a aspergilosis cerebral en un paciente de COVID-19. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Y Reanim. 2022; 69, 592–596. [Google Scholar]
  75. Bhotla, H.K.; Balasubramanian, B.; Meyyazhagan, A.; Pushparaj, K.; Easwaran, M.; Pappusamy, M.; Robert, A.A.; Arumugam, V.A.; Tsibizova, V.; Alfalih, A.M.; et al. Opportunistic mycoses in COVID-19 patients/survivors: Epidemic inside a pandemic. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Verweij, P.E.; Brüggemann, R.J.M.; Azoulay, E.; Bassetti, M.; Blot, S.; Buil, J.B.; Calandra, T.; Chiller, T.; Clancy, C.J.; Cornely, O.A.; et al. Taskforce report on the diagnosis and clinical management of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Intensive Care Med. 2021, 47, 819–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Salazar, F.; Bignell, E.; Brown, G.D.; Cook, P.C.; Warris, A. Pathogenesis of respiratory viral and fungal coinfections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 35, e00094-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aiello, A.; Farzaneh, F.; Candore, G.; Caruso, C.; Davinelli, S.; Gambino, C.M.; Ligotti, M.E.; Zareian, N.; Accardi, G. Immunosenescence and its hallmarks: How to oppose aging strategically? A review of potential options for therapeutic intervention. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kadambari, S.; Klenerman, P.; Pollard, A.J. Why the elderly appear to be more severely affected by COVID-19: The potential role of immunosenescence and CMV. Rev. Med. Virol. 2020, 30, e2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Y.; Pang, S.C.; Yang, Y. A potential association between immunosenescence and high COVID-19 related mortality among elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases. Immun. Ageing 2021, 18, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Holman, N.; Knighton, P.; Kar, P.; O’Keefe, J.; Curley, M.; Weaver, A.; Barron, E.; Bakhai, C.; Khunti, K.; Wareham, N.J.; et al. Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: A population-based cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lim, S.; Bae, J.H.; Kwon, H.S.; Nauck, M.A. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: From pathophysiology to clinical management. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sudhakar, M.; Winfred, S.B.; Meiyazhagan, G.; Venkatachalam, D.P. Mechanisms contributing to adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in obesity. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2022, 477, 1155–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, B.; Li, R.; Lu, Z.; Huang, Y. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: Evidence from meta-analysis. Aging 2020, 12, 6049–6057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chong, W.H.; Saha, B.K.; Neu, K.P. Comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19-associate pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection 2022, 50, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Apostolopoulou, A.; Garrigos, Z.E.; Vijayvargiya, P.; Lerner, A.H.; Farmakiotis, D. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review of the literature. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Borger, P.; Koeter, G.H.; Timmerman, A.J.; Vellenga, A.; Tomee, J.F.; Kauffman, H.F. Protease from Aspergillus fumigatus induce interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 producin in airway epithelial cell lines by transcriptional mechanisms. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 180, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kuri-Cervantes, L.; Pampena, M.B.; Meng, W.; Rosenfeld, A.M.; Ittner, C.A.G.; Weisman, A.R.; Agyekum, R.S.; Mathew, D.; Baxter, A.E.; Vella, L.A.; et al. Comprehensive mapping of immune perturbations associated with severe COVID-19. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eabd7114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Lozada-Requena, I.; Núñez Ponce, C. COVID-19: Respuesta inmune y perspectivas terapéuticas. Rev. Peru Med. Exp. Salud Pública 2020, 37, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Giudicessi, J.R.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Friedman, P.A.; Ackerman, M.J. Urgent guidance for navigating and circumventing the QTc-prolonging and torsadogenic potential of possible pharmaco-therapies for Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Varshneya, M.; Irurzun-Arana, I.; Campana, C.; Dariolli, R.; Gutierrez, A.; Pullinger, T.K.; Sobie, E.A. Investigational treatments for COVID-19 may increase ventricular arrhythmia risk through drug interactions. CPT Pharmacomet. Syst. Pharmacol. 2021, 10, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jenks, J.D.; Mehta, S.R.; Hoenigl, M. Broad spectrum triazoles for invasive mould infections in adults: Which drug and when? Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S168–S178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gonçalves, S.S.; Stchigel, A.; Cano, J.; Guarro, J.; Colombo, A.L. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant species belonging to Aspergillus section Flavi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1944–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Aruanno, M.; Glampedakis, E.; Lamoth, F. Echinocandins for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis: From laboratory to bedside. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00399-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Ergün, M.; Brüggemann, R.J.M.; Alanio, A.; Delliére, S.; van Arkel, A.; Bentvelsen, R.G.; Rijpstra, T.; van der Sar-van der Brugge, S.; Lagrou, K.; Janssen, N.A.F.; et al. Aspergillus test profiles and mortality in critically Ill COVID-19 patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e01229-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Itoh, K.; Tsutani, H.; Iwasaki, H. Multifaceted efficacy of caspofungin against fungal infections in COVID-19 patients. Med. Hypotheses 2022, 164, 110876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mohamed, A.; Rogers, T.R.; Talento, A.F. COVID-19 Associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. J. Fungi. 2020, 6, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hatzl, S.; Reisinger, A.C.; Posch, F.; Prattes, J.; Stradner, M.; Pilz, S.; Eller, P.; Schoerghuber, M.; Toller, W.; Gorkiewicz, G.; et al. Antifungal prophylaxis 815 for prevention of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients: An observational study. Crit. Care 2021, 25, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 11 01227 g001 550
Figure 1. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) infectious process. (A) Dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system creates a pro-inflammatory environment in the host through reactive oxygen species (ROS), IL-6 and IL-8, pulmonary cell infiltrate by neutrophils, complement activation, and recognition of viral RNA through pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS), while damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) stimulate large amounts of IL-1β and TNF-α. In addition, IFNγ, MCP1, and IP-10 are produced. This process causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which, together with corticosteroids, patient comorbidities, and Aspergillus in the environment, facilitates the fungal invasion of the host. (B) In addition, a deficient immune response from the host alters the IFN I and III production; likewise, medications and decreased alveolar macrophages favor susceptibility to CAPA.
Figure 1. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) infectious process. (A) Dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system creates a pro-inflammatory environment in the host through reactive oxygen species (ROS), IL-6 and IL-8, pulmonary cell infiltrate by neutrophils, complement activation, and recognition of viral RNA through pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS), while damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) stimulate large amounts of IL-1β and TNF-α. In addition, IFNγ, MCP1, and IP-10 are produced. This process causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which, together with corticosteroids, patient comorbidities, and Aspergillus in the environment, facilitates the fungal invasion of the host. (B) In addition, a deficient immune response from the host alters the IFN I and III production; likewise, medications and decreased alveolar macrophages favor susceptibility to CAPA.
Pathogens 11 01227 g001
Table
Table 1. Aspergillus species associated with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis.
Table 1. Aspergillus species associated with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis.
SpeciesCountry
(Cases Number)		Identification MethodReference
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiItaly (9)Culture from BAL and AT[14]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiGermany (4)Culture from BAL, AT, and PCR[18]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiNetherlands (6)Culture from BAL, AT, and sputum[21]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiItaly (1)Culture from BAL[22]
A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, A. niger/A. section Nigri, A. flavus/A. section FlaviItaly (NA)Culture from BAL[23]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiFrance (1)Culture from AT (X2)[24]
A. fumigatusUnited Kingdom (NA)Respiratory secretions (BAL fluids, NBL fluids, TA, and secretions) were subjected to GM testing, Aspergillus-specific PCR, microscopic examination, and mycological culture. A limited selection of serum or BAL fluid samples was also subjected to Aspergillus-specific LFD testing.[25]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiFrance (NA)Culture from BAL and AT[26]
Aspergillus spp.France (NA)Culture from BAL and AT[27]
A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, A. flavus/A. section Flavi, A. calidoustus/A. section UstiFrance (NA)Culture from BAL, AB, and AT[28]
A. fumigatus (TR34/L98H mutation)/A. section FumigatiFrance (1)Culture from AT[29]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiFrance (NA)Culture from BAL and AT[30]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiDenmark (NA)Culture from BAL and AT[31]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiGermany (2)Culture from BAL[32]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiSwiss (NA)Culture from AT[33]
A. flavus/A. section FlaviFrance (1)Culture from AT[34]
A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, A. citrinoterreus/A. section Terrei, A.
lentulus/A. section Fumigati		Spain (NA)Culture from BAL[35]
A. fumigatus (TR32/L98H mutation)/A. section FumigatiNetherlands (1)Culture from BAL and AT[36]
A. fumigatus (TR34/L98H mutation)/A. section FumigatiIreland (1)Culture from AT[37]
A. flavus/A. section Flavi, A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, A. terreus/A. section TerreiPakistan (NA)Culture from BAL, AT, and sputum[38]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiAustria (1)Culture from AT[39]
A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, Aspergillus spp., A.
flavus/A. section Flavi, A. niger/A. section Nigri		Mexico (NA)Culture from AT[40]
A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, A. flavus/A. section FlaviBelgium (7)Culture from BAL and AT[41]
UnidentifiedBrazil (1)Sequencing identifying
A. penicillioides		[42]
A. fumigatus, A. niger,
A. flavus		Spain (NA)ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 amplification by PCR and Sanger sequencing[43]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiAustralia (1)Culture from AT (X3)[44]
A. fumigatus/A. section Fumigati, A. flavus/A. section Flavi, A. terreus/A. section TerreiNetherlands (NA)Culture from BAL[45]
Aspergillus spp.Mexico (NA)Culture from BAL[46]
A. fumigatus/A. section FumigatiFrance (NA)Culture from BAL and AT[47]
BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; AT: tracheal aspirate; NBL: non-bronchoscopic lavage specimens; GM: galactomannan; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; LFD: lateral flow device; BDG: β-D-glucan; AB: bronchial aspirate; NA: not available.
Table
Table 2. Risk factors for COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in different countries.
Table 2. Risk factors for COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in different countries.
CountryNumber of CasesComorbidities
Italy108Obesity, AH, DM, coronary disease, COPD, CRF, hemodialysis, cerebrovascular disease, malignancies, solid organ transplant, chronic steroid treatment, and atrial fibrillation.
France615AH, obesity, DM, BA, cardiac disease, gout, thyroid cancer, MDS, Hashimoto disease, hyperlipidemia, cancer, hemopathy, CRF, kidney transplant recipient, HIV, steroid treatment, COPD, dialysis, stroke, CHF (NYHA classification 3–4), arrhythmias, CRF.
Belgium20AH, DM, hypercholesterolemia, CRF, obesity, AML, HIV.
China152DM, AH, heart disease, COPD, CRF.
Germany21AH, COPD, DM, obesity, OSA, pulmonary fibrosis.
Netherlands74Cardiomyopathy, COPD, BA, DM, AH, chronic steroid treatment, neutropenia, stem cell transplant, immunodeficiency, DM, CRF.
Austria1COPD, OSA, Obesity, DM, AH, and cardiac disease.
Netherland74Reflux, polyarthrosis.
Ireland1DM, AH, hyperlipidemia, obesity.
Brazil1AH, DM, CRF.
Pakistan23DM, AH, atrial myxoma, recent stroke.
Switzerland118AH, DM, obesity, pulmonary fibrosis, BA.
Spain239MDS, HIV, DM, COPD, ankylosing spondylitis, acquired hemophilia A, hypothyroidism, CLL, cardiac disease, AH, BA, obesity, CRF, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and CNS disease.
Denmark8AH, BA.
UK916DM, AH, CRF, obesity, cancer, CRF malignancy, hyperlipidemia, cardiac and vascular disease, and autoimmune disorders.
USA46Atrial fibrillation, COPD, AH, OSA, DM, CRF, coronary disease, CHD, ESRD, nephrectomy, vasculitis, junctional tachycardia, bipolar disorder, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, hypothyroidism, gastric ulcer, atherosclerosis, and sarcopenia.
AH: arterial hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRF: chronic renal failure; BA: bronchial asthma; AML: acute myeloid leukemia; HIV: human immunodeficiency syndrome; OSA: obstructive sleep apnea; MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome; CLL: chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CRF: chronic respiratory failure; CNS: central nervous system; CHF: congestive heart failure; NYHA: New York Heart Association; CHD: congenital heart disease; ESRD: end-stage renal disease.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro-Fuentes, C.A.; Reyes-Montes, M.d.R.; Frías-De-León, M.G.; Valencia-Ledezma, O.E.; Acosta-Altamirano, G.; Duarte-Escalante, E. Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection: What Is Known? Pathogens 2022, 11, 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111227

AMA Style

Castro-Fuentes CA, Reyes-Montes MdR, Frías-De-León MG, Valencia-Ledezma OE, Acosta-Altamirano G, Duarte-Escalante E. Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection: What Is Known? Pathogens. 2022; 11(11):1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castro-Fuentes, Carlos Alberto, María del Rocío Reyes-Montes, María Guadalupe Frías-De-León, Omar E. Valencia-Ledezma, Gustavo Acosta-Altamirano, and Esperanza Duarte-Escalante. 2022. "Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection: What Is Known?" Pathogens 11, no. 11: 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111227

APA Style

Castro-Fuentes, C. A., Reyes-Montes, M. d. R., Frías-De-León, M. G., Valencia-Ledezma, O. E., Acosta-Altamirano, G., & Duarte-Escalante, E. (2022). Aspergillus-SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection: What Is Known? Pathogens, 11(11), 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop