Next Article in Journal
Epidemiology and Genotype Distribution of Hepatitis C Virus in Russia
Previous Article in Journal
Tuberculosis Infection in Pregnant People: Current Practices and Research Priorities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Commensal Rodents: Still a Current Threat

by
Valentina Virginia Ebani
1,2
1
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Centre for Climate Change Impact, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Pathogens 2022, 11(12), 1483; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121483
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
Commensal rodents live in human habitats where they can find essential elements, including food, water, shelter, and space. The house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), and roof rat (Rattus rattus) are the main rodent species categorized as commensal. All are responsible for several problems. Rodents often gnaw through almost any material, including lead and cement, causing expensive structural damages; they also are considered as causes of fires when they gnaw on electrical wires. Rodents consume food, partially eating and discarding it, and they spoil agricultural crops.
Farms are environments that are often heavily infested by commensal rodents that cause damages to structures and animals, with consequent relevant economic losses. In farms, they find food and protection against adverse climatic conditions during very cold or hot times of the year. In particular, poultry farms are frequently infested by rodents that damage eggs, egg trays, gunny bags, poultry feed, and poultry house structures [1]. The large presence of rodents is the cause of decreased poultry performance as well [2]. In fact, they not only cause high mortality rates mainly by killing baby chicks but also induce production losses by breaking and/or eating eggs and frightening birds by their movements or by the noises they create [3].
Alongside all these problems that have a relevant economic impact, there is the sanitary aspect involving human and animal health. Commensal rodents contaminate environments and foodstuffs with different pathogenic virus, bacteria, and parasites via their urine, feces, and hairs. In addition, these pests often carry fleas, ticks, and other hematophagous arthropods, which potentially spread diseases, such as Lyme disease by Borrelia burgdorferi, murine typhus by Rickettsia typhi, and the bubonic plague by Yersinia pestis. Furthermore, recently, some spotted fever group Rickettsia species have been detected in rodents, suggesting them as natural reservoirs for these bacteria [4].
Bacterial infections in people and animals caused by rodents have been reported globally. The transmission of zoonotic diseases from rodents is possible by direct contact, bites, indirect contact with contaminated objects, oral ingestion, or the inhalation of aerosolized bedding, feces, and urine. Rat bite fever, tularemia, leptospirosis, salmonellosis, yersiniosis, campylobacteriosis, and pathogenic E. coli infections are well-known bacterial zoonoses responsible for infections, and they sometimes have lethal outcome that are more or less frequent in relation to the geographic area and hygienic conditions.
Francisella tularensis, the etiologic agent of Tularemia, is largely distributed to the Northern hemisphere (Europe, North America, and Asia) and is not normally found in the tropics or the southern hemisphere, although it has been isolated in Australia [5]. Rodents and lagomorphs, excreting francisellae in secretions and excreta, are sources of infections for humans, who become infected when ingesting contaminated drinking water, inhaling contaminated aerosols or agricultural and landscaping dust, having skin contact with infected animals, and also receiving bites of ticks and deer flies carrying the bacteria [6].
Rat bite fever is caused by Streptobacillus moniliformis and Spirillum minus in North America and Asia, respectively, where people typically become infected after contact with rodents or via the consumption of food or water contaminated with the urine and droppings of rodents carrying the bacteria [7].
Leptospirosis is a global zoonoses traditionally associated with rodents; they are most frequently infected by Leptospira interrogans serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae, but other serovars may be excreted by these animals. Rodents act as maintenance hosts for leptospirae and play a pivotal role in the epidemiology of leptospirosis contaminating environments with their urine. Increased cases of leptospirosis have been related to more frequent episodes of heavy rain that favor animal urine in the soil or on other surfaces to run into floodwater, contaminating it [8].
Commensal rodents are also sources of bacterial enteropathogens, and they are often antimicrobial resistant, such as Salmonella spp. and other Enterobacteriaceae and Campylobacter spp. [9]. Infected rodents excrete these pathogens in their feces, contaminating different environments, including farms, kennels, and gardens. Furthermore, they may serve as microbiological hazard transmitters for predators such as birds of prey, wild canids, and cats. In all cases, commensal rodents become the direct or indirect sources of infections by enteropathogens for humans as well.
Recently, Platt-Samoraj and coworkers [10] demonstrated that rodents can be vectors of different Yersinia species responsible for the contamination of farm facilities. Yersinia enterocolitica is the most widespread species, but Y. kristensenii and Y. pseudotuberculosis have been found in the feces of rodents as well.
In conclusion, nowadays, commensal rodents are a severe threat globally not only in geographic areas with poverty and poor hygiene conditions but also in countries with good economic statuses. All people know the material damages caused by rodents, but only a few persons are adequately informed about the diseases and their severity, which are transmissible by these pests. Control measures against commensal rodents by maintaining good hygiene conditions and using traps and rodenticides are required in all environments with features of food availability and temperatures that attract pests.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parshad, V.R.; Ahmad, N.; Chopra, G. Deterioration of poultry farm environment by commensal rodents and their control. Int. Biodeterior. 1987, 23, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kandhwal, S. Evaluation of Bait Carrier for Rattus rattus L. Infesting Commercial Poultry Facilities in India: A Step towards sustainable poultry management. Int. J. Art Sci. 2009, 3, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rao, A.M.K.M.; Sakthivel, P. Role of rodents in poultry environs and their management. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res. 2015, 2, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wagner, E.; Tukhanova, N.; Shin, A.; Turebekov, N.; Shapiyeva, Z.; Shevtsov, A.; Nurmakhanov, T.; Sutyagin, V.; Berdibekov, A.; Maikanov, N.; et al. Incidence of tick-borne spotted fever group Rickettsia species in rodents in two regions in Kazakhstan. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aravena-Román, M.; Merritt, A.; Inglis, T.J.J. First case of Francisella bacteraemia in Western Australia. New Microbes New Infect. 2015, 8, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tularemia. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/tularemia/index.html (accessed on 25 November 2022).
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rat Bite Fever. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/rat-bite-fever/index.html (accessed on 25 November 2022).
  8. Naing, C.; Reid, S.A.; Aye, S.N.; Htet, N.H.; Ambu, S. Risk factors for human leptospirosis following flooding: A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Skarżyńska, M.; Zając, M.; Kamińska, E.; Bomba, A.; Żmudzki, J.; Jabłoński, A.; Wasyl, D. Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents-True or False Threat? Pathogens 2020, 9, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Platt-Samoraj, A.; Kończyk-Kmiecik, K.; Bakuła, T. Occurrence and Genetic Correlations of Yersinia spp. Isolated from Commensal Rodents in Northeastern Poland. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ebani, V.V. Commensal Rodents: Still a Current Threat. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121483

AMA Style

Ebani VV. Commensal Rodents: Still a Current Threat. Pathogens. 2022; 11(12):1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ebani, Valentina Virginia. 2022. "Commensal Rodents: Still a Current Threat" Pathogens 11, no. 12: 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121483

APA Style

Ebani, V. V. (2022). Commensal Rodents: Still a Current Threat. Pathogens, 11(12), 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop