Next Article in Journal
Determination of Virulence-Associated Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Brucella Isolates Recovered from Humans and Animals in Iran Using NGS Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever Spirochaetes from Ethiopia and Nigeria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carriage of the JP2 Genotype of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans by Periodontitis Patients of Various Geographic Origin, Living in Sweden
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

qPCR Detection and Quantification of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Other Periodontal Pathogens in Saliva and Gingival Crevicular Fluid among Periodontitis Patients

1
Research Laboratory in Oral Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10000, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10000, Morocco
3
Medical Research Laboratory, Children’s Hospital, University Centre Ibn Sina, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10000, Morocco
4
Research Laboratory in Oral Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10000, Morocco
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010076
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 30 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023

Abstract

:
Objective: The detection of special bacterial species in patients with periodontitis is considered useful for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of specific periopathogens and investigate whether there is a correlation between the results of different bacterial species in whole saliva and pooled subgingival plaque samples (healthy and diseased sites) from individuals with periodontitis and periodontally healthy subjects. Materials and methods: In total, 52 patients were recruited and divided into two groups: non-periodontitis and periodontitis patients. For each group, the following periodontal pathogens were detected using real-time polymerase chain reaction: A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 clone, A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2 clone, Porphyromonasgingivalis, and total eubacteria. Results: Higher levels of the various studied bacteria were present in both saliva and plaque samples from the periodontitis group in comparison to non-periodontitis subjects. There were significant differences in P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 clones in the saliva of periodontitis patient compared to the control group. Subgingival plaque of diseased sites presented a significant and strong positive correlation between A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis. In saliva samples, there was a significant positive correlation between A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 clone and P. gingivalis (p ≤ 0.002). Conclusion: Quantifying and differentiating these periodontal species from subgingival plaque and saliva samples showed a good potential as diagnostic markers for periodontal disease. Regarding the prevalence of the studied bacteria, specifically A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 clone, found in this work, and the high rate of susceptibility to periodontal species in Africa, future larger studies are recommended.

1. Introduction

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory condition that occurs in the presence of multiple etiological factors, including mainly bacteria and immune response; but also, genetic, and environmental factors [1]. In this complex scheme, the presence of specific bacteria in the subgingival biofilm may play a key role in the pathogenesis of the disease, either directly or indirectly. The subgingival biofilm is a complex microbiota with over 700 bacterial species [2]. Among these, a distinct microbial community dominated by obligate anaerobes and proteolytic species, namely Porphyromonas gingivalis [3], Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia, known as the “red complex”, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, have been shown to be risk factors for the onset or progression of periodontitis [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Furthermore, Oliveira et al. and Chapparo et al. [11,12], added 13 bacterial taxa to the list of potential periodontal pathobionts based on the results of open-ended 16S rRNA gene analyses. The presence of the putative bacteria in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) has been linked to diseased sites and in low numbers to healthy sites. Likewise, high concentrations of this bacteria are found in saliva of periodontitis patients [13].
Thus, sampling the saliva might be a promising method of microbial diagnosis in periodontal conditions [14,15], as this fluid can be easily, repetitively, and non-invasively collected. However, several studies have shown that the bacterial composition of saliva differs significantly from that of dental biofilm, including both supra- and subgingival microbiota [16,17]. A previous study also revealed a difference in microbiota community structure between supragingival plaque and saliva, as well as the compositional stability of salivary microbiota against a supragingival microbiota shift [18].
The aim of this case control study was to assess the presence and quantification of A. actinomycetemcomitans clone JP2 and non JP2, P. gingivalis and total bacteria in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid in periodontitis patients.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Clinical Measurements

This case control study included 32 patients seeking periodontal treatment at the clinical department of periodontology in the Center of Consultation and Dental Treatments (CCTD), Ibn Sina university hospital in Rabat. Twenty-one non-periodontitis subjects were also recruited as a control group. Inclusion criteria were, systemically healthy subjects, aged 18 years old and above, non-tobaccousers, and with at least 20 teeth. Exclusion criteria were use of antibiotics and or periodontal treatment during the past six months prior to the clinical examination, and pregnant or lactating women.
The Ethical Committee for Biomedical Research at Mohammed V University Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy in Rabat approved this study protocol(N°62/18) in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration on research involving human subjects, and all participants signed an informed consent form written in their native language.

2.2. Study Design

For periodontal diagnostics, probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL), were measured at six sites per tooth, excluding third molars using a standard periodontal probe (Hu-friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). Plaque index (PI) (O’Leary et al. 1972) [19] and bleeding on probing (BOP) (Ainamoand bay 1975) [20] were assessed, too. Retro-alveolar X-rays were taken for periodontitis patients.
The absence of periodontitis was defined as absence of history periodontitis, PD ≤ 3 mm, no proximal clinical attachment loss, and no recession. Whereas a periodontitis patient was defined as having at least two non-adjacent teeth with interdental clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥2 mm, probing pocket depth (PPD) of more than 3 mm, and radiographic evidence of bone loss [21,22].
Periodontitis were classified by stage and grade accordingly to the latest classification of periodontal diseases and conditions [22]. Definitions of stages were based on severity (primarily periodontal breakdown and periodontitis-associated tooth loss), complexity of management (pocket depth, infrabony defects, tooth mobility, furcation defects, masticatory deficiency), when grades definitions of periodontitis were based on direct or indirect evidence of the progression rate of the disease. Three categories can be distinguished: slow (Grade A), moderate (Grade B), and a rapid rate of progression (Grade C) [22].

2.3. Saliva and Subgingival Plaque Sampling

Saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were collected from each participant.
For saliva sampling, all subjects were instructed to avoid using oral hygiene products and to abstain from eating for at least one hour before the examination. Salivary sampling was conducted from 08:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. After rinsing the oral cavity with tap water for 30 s and passive drooling into sterile plastic tubes, 5 mL of unstimulated whole saliva was collected from each subject. Immediately, collected saliva samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 6000 rpm, then distributed in aliquots and frozen at −80 °C until analysis [23,24].
GCF samples were collected as pool samples. In the periodontitis group, we collected one pooled sample from diseased sites (two deepest pockets exhibiting the highest CAL values) and one pool sample from two healthy sites when possible. A pool sample was taken from two healthy sites in healthy subjects too. Sampling sites were isolated from the saliva by a cotton roll and supra-gingival plaque was removed, after that two sterilized autoclaved medium paper point N°40 were inserted consecutively into the chosen sites and left for 30 s. Samples were then put in 500 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution [24].
All samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 6000 rpm before being frozen at −80 °C until microbial analysis.

2.4. Microbiological Analysis

Both saliva samples and subgingival plaque samples were analyzed by qPCR. Specific primers were used for the identification and quantification of the following periodontal pathogens: Porphyromonasgingivalis (Pg), A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 (Aa JP2), and A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2 (Aa non JP2). A universal probe detecting 14 oral bacterial species (A. actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonasgingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tanerella forsythia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, Haemophilusaphrophilus, Eikenellacorrendens, Streptococcus (S.) anginosus, S. sobrinus, S. gordonii, S. mutans, S. salivarius, Escherchia coli.) were also used.
P. gingivalis (Pg) (clinical purified strain), A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 (Aa JP2) (HK 912), and A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2 (HK 1605) were used as positive control strains. They were obtained from Umeå University’s Department of Odontology in Sweden.
Standard suspensions ranging 108 to 101 cells/mL were prepared for P. gingivalis, A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2, and A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2.
Bacterial DNA was extracted from straincultures, saliva and subgingival plaque samples, using the Invitrogen PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), as directed by the manufacturer. A spectrophotometer was used to determine the purity (quality) and yield (quantity) of the eluted DNA (Nanodrop, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The absorbance ratio at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280) was used to determine the purity of DNA.

2.5. Primers and Probes

The selection of primers was based on previous data sources with information on species-specific oligonucleotides of the 16S ribosomal RNA in each strain of this study [25,26]. Table 1 shows the primer pairs and TaqMan probe sets used in the real-time PCR assay for the detection and quantification of the targeted periodontal pathogens. The expected product size is shown in Table 1. The primers were purchased from Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific.

2.6. Real-Time PCR Assay

Quantitative real-time PCR assay was performed using the Applied Biosystems Quant Studio 5 Real-Time PCR System with the cycle profile shown in Table 2. Each PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 μL of PCR mixture using 10 μL qPCR kits (2×TaqMan Multiplex Master Mix, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 0.8 μL each of sense and antisense primers, 1 μL of the probe, 3.4 μL of sterilized DNase-RNase-free water, and 4 μL of template DNA solution. The NTC includes all of the RT-PCR reagents except the DNA template.
Quantification analysis uses sample “crossing points” (CP) to determine the presence and the concentration of the target DNA in known and unknown samples after amplification. Threshold cycle (Ct) is defined as the number of cycles required for the fluorescence to become detectable above the background fluorescence and Ct levels are inversely proportional to the logarithm of the amount of target nucleic acid in the sample. Standard curves were generated for all the target bacteria using DNA from pure cultures and species-specific DNA primers. DNA isolated from a pure culture of P. gingivalis was used in generating a standard curve for the universal primers and probe (Supplementary Figure S1). Bacterial DNA levels were calculated from the standard curve equations created by tenfold serial dilution of DNA standards. All samples, including DNA standards, subgingival plaque and saliva samples, and negative test control were analyzed in duplicate.

2.7. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi software [27]. Values of demographic features and clinical parameters are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage.
We used Student t-tests for the comparison of clinical parameters (BOP, pockets depths, Clinical attachment loss) between control and patient groups.
The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the concentrations of studied bacteria in healthy subgingival plaque samples and saliva between the non-periodontitis and periodontitis groups.
Khi-deux and Fisher tests were used to determine the frequency of qualitative variables in the two group populations.
Pearson’s correlation test was used for quantitative variables with a Gaussian distribution, and for variables with a non-Gaussian distribution, we used Spearman’s correlation.
A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The mean age of the study population was 27.83 ± 8.18, among them 77.4% were female. Table 3 summarizes the socio-demographic and clinical characteristic of the studied groups.
In periodontitis group, five patients had periodontitis Grade B and 27 patients had periodontitis Grade C.
Global results regarding the prevalence of the studied bacteria showed an absence of A. actinomycetemcomitansnon JP2 and Aa JP2 clones in non-periodontitis patients both in saliva and sub-gingival plaque. In periodontitis patients, Aa non JP2 was present in saliva and in healthy sites (respectively 16% and 10%), while Aa JP2 was present in 50% of saliva samples and 16.7% in healthy sites.
Pg was present either in non-periodontitis patients and periodontitis patients both in saliva and healthy sites. The prevalence of Pg was significantly higher in saliva of periodontitis patients (70.1%) versus 38.1% in non-periodontitis patients (p = 0.024). In healthy sites, there was no statistical difference regarding the presence of Pg between the two groups (50% for non-periodontitis patients versus 56.7% in periodontitis patients).
The level comparison of the different quantified bacteria in saliva and healthy sites of the tow studied groups showed mainly:
A high concentration of eubacteria in periodontitis patients’ healthy sites compared to the control group (p < 0.001).
There was a statistically significant difference in P. gingivalis and Aa JP2clone concentrations in saliva samples, with the diseased group having a higher concentration than the non-periodontitis group (Table 4).
In the periodontitis group, the results showed a statistically significant difference in all quantified bacteria between healthy sites and diseased sites (p < 0.005) (Table 5).
When comparing Grade B and Grade C periodontitis, despite being statistically insignificant, the results showed a high concentration of total bacteria, Pg, Aa JP2 and non-JP2 clones in the patient group with grade C periodontitis compared to the grade B group (Table 6).
The correlations between the different bacterial species in all individuals are shown in Table 7. The correlation coefficients ranged from −1 to 1, with positive correlations being greater than 0 and negative correlations being lower than 0. In the subgingival fluid of diseased sites, P. gingivalis demonstrated a substantial strong positive correlation (rs = 0.934) with Aa non JP2 bacteria (p < 0.001). The correlation between Aa non JP2 and P. gingivalis in the subgingival fluid of healthy sites was (Spearman r = 0.377), with a p value of 0.007, indicating a significant medium-positive correlation.
In saliva samples of the whole population, JP2 and P. gingivalis bacteria showed a significant positive correlation (rs = 0.432; p = 0.002) and a very significant (p < 0.001) positive correlation between JP2 and Aa non JP2 (rs = 0.505) (Table 8).

4. Discussion

Higher levels of the studied periopathogens were found in both saliva and plaque samples from the periodontitis group in comparison to healthy subjects. This supports previous studies on the bacterial etiology of periodontitis. Indeed, it is largely admitted that periodontitis may occur in presence of complex polymicrobial communities, which can threaten the periodontium because the grow of the total number of bacteria or development of highly pathogenic bacteria. The complex polymicrobial biofilm associated to periodontitis interacts with the immune response, leading to periodontium breakdown.In the present study, we noticed a significant difference in P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 clone in the saliva of the periodontitis patients compared to the control group, and statistically significant differences were also found for all the studied bacteria in subgingival plaque samples of periodontitis when compared to non-periodontitis patients.
In the gingival fluid of diseased sites, there was a significant and strong positive correlation between A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2 and P. gingivalis. The same bacteria were found in the gingival fluid of our population’s healthy sites and showed a positive correlation. JP2 clone and P. gingivalis bacteria showed a significant positive correlation in saliva samples, and JP2 and Aa bacteria showed a strong correlation.
Microbiological identification by colony counting has long been regarded as the “gold standard” technique. However, this is clearly limited due to the complex nature of periodontal disease bacterial flora, which makes it extremely difficult to cultivate [28,29]. qPCR, on the other hand, is a more sensitive and accurate method for detecting and quantifying periodontal pathogens in various oral samples. Much of the previous research has focused on investigating subgingival microbiota levels using a case–control study design. The control group may include healthy subjects [30], gingivitis patients [31], or only different periodontal patient groups based on periodontal severity [32]. Furthermore, some qPCR studies have been conducted solely on subjects with periodontal disease [33]. Thus, traditional methods of diagnosing periodontal disease are insufficient, with recently more detailed stages and grades corresponding to the associated treatment protocol, a microbiological examination that is characteristic of the entire oral cavity’s subgingival microflora is important for the use of concomitant systemic antibiotics in certain types of periodontitis [34,35].
Due to its easy, quick, and non-invasive sampling, salivary microbiota quantification has been successfully used in several studies and has been proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for periodontitis [36,37] either in the healthy population [38] or in the periodontitis patients [39]. However, the number of studies that have used the conventional quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technique to detect and quantify oral pathogens in distinct study groups is limited.
Our results are consistent with previous research that found a higher number of pathogens in periodontal patients than in healthy patients [37,40,41]. Many studies have heterogeneous bacteria analysis results in both types of sampling because different techniques, study population types, and saliva sampling methods were used. They revealed differences in the mean prevalence of subgingival or saliva species in samples from subjects with various clinical conditions, which could be due to differences in geographic locations, diet, genetics, and disease susceptibility factors [42,43]. However, and according to the available literature, there is a notable underrepresentation of data from the Middle East and North Africa geographic region (MENA) [44]. Specifically, no observational studies on adults or evaluating the prevalence and number of salivary periodontal microorganisms in African countries, particularly the Moroccan population, have been conducted.
Consequently, in this study, we investigated the presence and the amounts of three important periodontal pathogens, namely A. actinomycetmcomitans non JP2, P. gingivalis, and A. actinomycetmcomitans JP2 clones, as well as the total number of bacteria estimated with universal primers and probes in subgingival plaque and whole saliva samples from periodontitis and non-periodontitis subjects. A correlation analysis among the aforementioned microorganisms was also confirmed.
Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) has been reported to be mainly prevalent in Asian populations [45]. As a member of the red-complex bacteria, it has been the most frequently studied species, along with Tannerella forsythia and T. denticola, and has been strongly associated to periodontitis. Most investigations reported more than 60% of red-complex species in saliva and subgingival plaque samples from periodontitis patients [41,46]. Our findings are comparable, with more than 70% prevalence in saliva and plaque samples of the patient group and a 100% detection rate in subgingival sites with periodontal damage. Regardless of sample type, the detection frequencies of P. gingivalis in the healthy group were much lower than those in the corresponding periodontitis group.
Generally, most studies reported that the detection frequency of specific red-complex bacteria in periodontal disease patients was higher in subgingival plaque than in saliva, which is in accordance with our results. However, several studiesfound the opposite shift [47,48].
Almost all correlations between bacteria and with the PPD and CAL values were positive. It explains that when a subgingival site with periodontal destruction was present, the majority of putative periopathogens presented higher values, as shown in Table 9. Comparison of the relative abundance in plaque samples showed a significant medium positive correlation between P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans in the healthy sites while a substantial strong positive association was observed between P. gingivalis and Aa (rs = 0.934, p < 0.001). Analysis of salivary samples, on the other hand, revealed a very strong correlation between JP2 clone and Aa bacteria, as well as P. gingivalis and JP2 clone, respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). In each correlation, both bacterial species have an effect on each other’s growth.
Our results are in line with several previous cross-sectional studies [13,48,49]. Sereti et al. [50] found a positive correlation on the level of the six microorganisms studied (i.e., A. actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), P. gingivalis (Pg), Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Treponema denticola (Td), Parvimonasmicra (Pm), and Prevotella intermedia (Pi)) in plaque and saliva samples of periodontitis patient groups except for Aa which was not detected. Based on a longitudinal study, Haubek and al. 2008 showed that subjects who carried the JP2 clone of A actinomycetemcomitans alone or together with non-JP2 clones of A actinomycetemcomitans had a significantly increased risk of periodontitis. Meanwhile, the risk of developing the disease was lower in those carrying non-JP2 clones only [9]. Moreover, Belibasakis et al. 2019 reported that when integrated within a 10-species subgingival biofilm model, A. actinomycetemcomitans did not significantly impact the abundance of the other bacterial species, nor did it affect the biofilm structure [51].
A. actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) is known as one of the most putative periodontal pathogens [52]. However, its prevalence varies greatly between studied populations worldwide. Disparities between countries may be due to differences in diet, periodontal status of the carriers, genetics, and ethnic racial characteristics of the population. In this study, the periodontitis group harbored higher prevalence of Aa non JP2 and JP2 clone both in saliva and diseased sites, whereas they were completely absent at the healthy sites as well as in samples from non-periodontitis subjects. These findings are consistent with those of other studies [53]. Some studies showed a low Aa detection frequency [54,55,56].
A. actinomycetemcomitans is an oral bacterium of the green complex that is involved in the pathogenesis of aggressive periodontitis in younger patients [43,56,57,58]. The difference in detection prevalence of this pathogen, despite being strongly associated with periodontal disease development and progression, may be due to A. actinomycetemcomitans’ serological heterogeneity. Aa serotype b, also known as the JP2 genotype, is the most pathogenic of the seven publicly known serotypes due to its extremely high levels of leukotoxin production, the main virulence factor of Aa when compared to the other serotype species [56,57,58].
In a recent cross-sectional study, Thorbert-Mrosetet al. used qPCR to assess the prevalence and quantity of A. actinomycetemcomitans (and the JP2 clone in particular) and five other bacterial subgingival species in children and adolescents from two groups of participants: Somali subjects and Swedish subjects of non-Somali ancestry. A. actinomycetemcomitans was present in almost all Somali participants. Furthermore, the JP2 clone was discovered in five Somalis (including two periodontitis cases), confirming the clone’s association with African populations. P. gingivalis and Treponema denticola were found in significantly higher numbers and frequencies in the Somali group, indicating a mature and adult type of subgingival microbiota [59]. Our results as well as previous research backed up these findings, demonstrating that JP2 genotype carriers may be exclusively found in people of African descent [58,60,61,62].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to successfully demonstrate the presence and prevalence of P. gingivalis, Aa non JP2, Aa JP2 genotype, and eubacteria species in a case control Moroccan community. It is also the first study to look at these putative pathogens in saliva and subgingival healthy and diseased sites from the same population. Our findings showed that the real-time PCR protocol described here was effective for quantifying and differentiating the periodontal species from subgingival plaque and saliva samples.
We did not evaluate all periopathogenic bacteria in this study, and given the high rate of susceptibility to periodontal pathogens in the African and MENA regions, additional studies involving more periodontal species using a larger population range would be useful for understanding the complex ecology observed in periodontitis and could also be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12010076/s1, Figure S1: Standard curves of genomic DNA from A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2, A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2, P. gingivalis and the Universal.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation and writing—original draft preparation, S.R.; Validation, formal analysis, data curation, investigation, review and editing, A.B.; Software, formal analysis, data curation, review and editing, K.D.; Validation, investigation, and supervision, H.T.; Methodology, investigation, resources, supervision, review and editing, O.k.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique, Morocco (CNRST), Grant number: PPR16/2016.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research at Mohammed V University Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy in Rabat (protocol N° 62/18).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data used to support the findings of this study are included in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bartold, P.M.; Van Dyke, T.E. Periodontitis: A host-mediated disruption of microbialhomeostasis. Unlearninglearned concepts. Periodontology 2013, 62, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Preza, D.; Olsen, I.; Willumsen, T.; Grinde, B.; Paster, B.J. Diversity and site-specificity of the oral microflora in the elderly. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 28, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Xu, W.; Zhou, W.; Wang, H.; Liang, S. Roles of Porphyromonasgingivalis and its virulence factors in periodontitis. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2020, 120, 45–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, B.-Y.; Lu, T.; Cai, Q.; Ho, M.-H.; Sheng, S.; Meng, H.-W.; Arsto, L.; Hong, J.; Xie, H. PotentialMicrobiological Risk Factors Associated WithPeriodontitis and PeriodontalHealthDisparities. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 789919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Socransky, S.S.; Haffajee, A.D. Periodontalmicrobialecology. Periodontol. 2000 2005, 38, 135–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. da Silva-Boghossian, C.M.; do Souto, R.M.; Luiz, R.R.; Colombo, A.P.V. Association of redcomplex, A. actinomycetemcomitans and non-oral bacteriawithperiodontaldiseases. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011, 56, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Charalampakis, G.; Dahlén, G.; Carlén, A.; Leonhardt, Å. Bacterial markers vs. clinical markers to predict progression of chronicperiodontitis: A 2-yr prospective observationalstudy. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2013, 121, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fine, D.H.; Markowitz, K.; Furgang, D.; Fairlie, K.; Ferrandiz, J.; Nasri, C.; McKiernan, M.; Gunsolley, J. Aggregatibacteractinomycetemcomitans and Its Relationship to Initiation of LocalizedAggressivePeriodontitis: Longitudinal CohortStudy of InitiallyHealthy Adolescents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3859–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Haubek, D.; Ennibi, O.-K.; Poulsen, K.; Væth, M.; Poulsen, S.; Kilian, M. Risk of aggressiveperiodontitis in adolescent carriers of the JP2 clone of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans in Morocco: A prospective longitudinal cohortstudy. Lancet 2008, 371, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fine, D.H.; Markowitz, K.; Fairlie, K.; Tischio-Bereski, D.; Ferrendiz, J.; Furgang, D.; Paster, B.J.; Dewhirst, F.E. A Consortium of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus parasanguinis, and Filifactoralocis Is Present in Sites Prior to Bone Loss in a Longitudinal Study of Localized Aggressive Periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2850–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pérez-Chaparro, P.; Gonçalves, C.; Figueiredo, L.; Faveri, M.; Lobão, E.; Tamashiro, N.; Duarte, P.; Feres, M. Newly Identified Pathogens Associated with Periodontitis: Asystematic review. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93, 846–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Oliveira, R.; Fermiano, D.; Feres, M.; Figueiredo, L.; Teles, F.; Soares, G.; Faveri, M. Levels of Candidate Periodontal Pathogens in Subgingival Biofilm. J. Dent. Res. 2016, 95, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Haririan, H.; Andrukhov, O.; Bertl, K.; Lettner, S.; Kierstein, S.; Moritz, A.; Rausch-Fan, X. Microbial Analysis of Subgingival Plaque Samples Compared to That of Whole Saliva in Patients with Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liljestrand, J.M.; Gursoy, U.K.; Hyvärinen, K.; Sorsa, T.; Suominen, A.L.; Könönen, E.; Pussinen, P. Combining Salivary Pathogen and Serum Antibody Levels Improves Their Diagnostic Ability in Detection of Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Krishnan, K.; Chen, T.; Paster, B. A practical guide to the oral microbiome and its relation to health and disease. Oral Dis. 2017, 23, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Segata, N.; Haake, S.K.; Mannon, P.; Lemon, K.P.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Huttenhower, C.; Izard, J. Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples. Genome Biol. 2012, 13, R42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hall, M.W.; Singh, N.; Ng, K.F.; Lam, D.K.; Goldberg, M.B.; Tenenbaum, H.C.; Neufeld, J.D.; Beiko, R.G.; Senadheera, D.B. Inter-personal diversity and temporal dynamics of dental, tongue, and salivary microbiota in the healthy oral cavity. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2017, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamanaka, W.; Takeshita, T.; Shibata, Y.; Matsuo, K.; Eshima, N.; Yokoyama, T.; Yamashita, Y. Compositional Stability of a Salivary Bacterial Population against Supragingival Microbiota Shift following Periodontal Therapy. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. O’Leary, T.J.; Drake, R.B.; Naylor, J.E. The Plaque Control Record. J. Periodontol. 1972, 43, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ainamo, J.; Bay, I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int. Dent. J. 1975, 25, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chapple, I.L.C.; Mealey, B.L.; Van Dyke, T.E.; Bartold, P.M.; Dommisch, H.; Eickholz, P.; Geisinger, M.L.; Genco, R.J.; Glogauer, M.; Goldstein, M.; et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89 (Suppl. 1), S74–S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Papapanou, P.N.; Sanz, M.; Buduneli, N.; Dietrich, T.; Feres, M.; Fine, D.H.; Flemmig, T.F.; Garcia, R.; Giannobile, W.V.; Graziani, F.; et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89, S173–S182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Navazesh, M.; Kumar, S.K. Measuringsalivary flow. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2008, 139, 35S–40S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, X.; Li, C.; Pan, Y. The Influences of Periodontal Status and Periodontal Pathogen Quantity on Salivary 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine and Interleukin-17 Levels. J. Periodontol. 2016, 87, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kirakodu, S.S.; Govindaswami, M.; Novak, M.J.; Ebersole, J.L.; Novak, K.F. Optimizing qPCR for the Quantification of Periodontal Pathogens in a Complex Plaque Biofilm. Open Dent. J. 2008, 2, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Yoshida, A.; Ennibi, O.-K.; Miyazaki, H.; Hoshino, T.; Hayashida, H.; Nishihara, T.; Awano, S.; Ansai, T. Quantitative discrimination of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans highly leukotoxic JP2 clone from non-JP2 clones in diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. The Jamovi Project. Jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. 2021. Available online: http://www.jamovi.org (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  28. Teles, R.; Teles, F.; Frias-Lopez, J.; Paster, B.; Haffajee, A. Lessons learned and unlearned in periodontal microbiology. Periodontol. 2000 2013, 62, 95–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tanner, A.C. Anaerobic culture to detectperiodontal and caries pathogens. J. Oral Biosci. 2015, 57, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nonnenmacher, C.; Dalpke, A.; Mutters, R.; Heeg, K. Quantitative detection of periodontopathogens by real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 2004, 59, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scapoli, L.; Girardi, A.; Palmieri, A.; Martinelli, M.; Cura, F.; Lauritano, D.; Carinci, F. Quantitative analysis of periodontal pathogens in periodontitis and gingivitis. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2015, 29, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zorina, O.A.; Kulakov, A.A.; Boriskina, O.A.; Rebrikov, D.V. Relationship between the Pathogenic Representatives of Periodontal Pockets Microbiocenosis in Patients with Periodontitis with Varying Degrees of Severity. Acta Nat. 2011, 3, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kotsilkov, K.; Popova, C.; Boyanova, L.; Setchanova, L.; Mitov, I. Comparison of culture method and real-time PCR for detection of putative periodontopathogenic bacteria in deep periodontal pockets. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015, 29, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dannewitz, B.; Pohl, S.; Eickholz, P.; Kim, T.-S. Clinical and microbiological effects of a combined mechanic-antibiotic therapy in subjects with Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans-associated periodontitis. Am. J. Dent. 2007, 20, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Ramich, T.; Schacher, B.; Scharf, S.; Röllke, L.; Arndt, R.; Eickholz, P.; Nickles, K. Subgingival plaque sampling after combined mechanical and antibiotic nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014, 19, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Paju, S.; Pussinen, P.; Suominen-Taipale, L.; Hyvönen, M.; Knuuttila, M.; Könönen, E. Detection of Multiple Pathogenic Species in Saliva Is Associated with Periodontal Infection in Adults. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Belstrøm, D.; Paster, B.J.; Fiehn, N.-E.; Bardow, A.; Holmstrup, P. Salivary bacterial fingerprints of established oral disease revealed by the Human Oral Microbe Identification using Next Generation Sequencing (HOMINGS) technique. J. Oral Microbiol. 2016, 8, 30170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhou, X.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Aprecio, R.M.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y. Real-time PCR quantification of six periodontal pathogens in saliva samples from healthy young adults. Clin. Oral Investig. 2015, 19, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Damgaard, C.; Danielsen, A.K.; Enevold, C.; Massarenti, L.; Nielsen, C.H.; Holmstrup, P.; Belstrøm, D. Porphyromonas gingivalis in saliva associates with chronic and aggressive periodontitis. J. Oral Microbiol. 2019, 11, 1653123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Belstrøm, D.; Grande, M.A.; Sembler-Møller, M.L.; Kirkby, N.; Cotton, S.L.; Paster, B.J.; Holmstrup, P. Influence of periodontal treatment on subgingival and salivary microbiotas. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Feng, X.; Zhang, L.; Xu, L.; Meng, H.; Lu, R.; Chen, Z.; Shi, D.; Wang, X. Detection of Eight Periodontal Microorganisms and Distribution of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA Genotypes in Chinese Patients with Aggressive Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Herrera, D.; Contreras, A.; Gamonal, J.; Oteo, A.; Jaramillo, A.; Silva, N.; Sanz, M.; Botero, J.E.; León, R. Subgingival microbial profiles in chronic periodontitis patients from Chile, Colombia and Spain. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2007, 35, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Claesson, R.; Höglund-Åberg, C.; Haubek, D.; Johansson, A. Age-related prevalence and characteristics of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in periodontitis patients living in Sweden. J. Oral Microbiol. 2017, 9, 1334504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Al Yahfoufi, Z.; Hadchiti, W. Prevalence of periodontal pathogens in a group of participants from the middle east and North Africa geographic region with minimal periodontal disease. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2017, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kuboniwa, M.; Amano, A.; Kimura, K.R.; Sekine, S.; Kato, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Okahashi, N.; Iida, T.; Shizukuishi, S. Quantitative detection of periodontal pathogens using real-time polymerase chain reaction with TaqMan probes. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2004, 19, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. O’Brien-Simpson, N.; Burgess, K.; Lenzo, J.; Brammar, G.; Darby, I.; Reynolds, E. Rapid Chair-Side Test for Detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Choi, J.; Lee, J.-B.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, S.; Seol, Y.-J.; Lee, Y.-M.; Rhyu, I.-C. Comparison of Periodontopathic Bacterial Profiles of Different Periodontal Disease Severity Using Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Belstrøm, D.; Sembler-Møller, M.L.; Grande, M.A.; Kirkby, N.; Cotton, S.L.; Paster, B.J.; Holmstrup, P. Microbial profile comparisons of saliva, pooled and site-specific subgingival samples in periodontitis patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Nickles, K.; Scharf, S.; Röllke, L.; Dannewitz, B.; Eickholz, P. Comparison of Two Different Sampling Methods for Subgingival Plaque: Subgingival Paper Points or Mouthrinse Sample? J. Periodontol. 2017, 88, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sereti, M.; Zekeridou, A.; Cancela, J.; Mombelli, A.; Giannopoulou, C. Microbiological testing of clinical samples before and after periodontal treatment. A comparative methodological study between real-time PCR and real-time-PCR associated to propidium monoazide. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2021, 7, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Belibasakis, G.N.; Maula, T.; Bao, K.; Lindholm, M.; Bostanci, N.; Oscarsson, J.; Ihalin, R.; Johansson, A. Virulence and Pathogenicity Properties of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Pathogens 2019, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Socransky, S.S.; Haffajee, A.D.; Cugini, M.A.; Smith, C.; Kent, R.L., Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1998, 25, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. De Soet, J.J.; Claesson, R.; Haubek, D.; Johansson, A.; Buijs, M.J.; Volgenant, C.M.C. The Highly Leukotoxic JP2 Genotype of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Is Present in the Population of the West African Island, Sal in Cape Verde: A Pilot Study. Pathogens 2022, 11, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gatto, M.R.; Montevecchi, M.; Paolucci, M.; Landini, M.P.; Checchi, L. Prevalence of six periodontal pathogens in subgingival samples of Italian patients with chronic periodontitis. New Microbiol. 2014, 37, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Salminen, A.; Kopra, K.A.E.; Hyvärinen, K.; Paju, S.; Mäntylä, P.; Buhlin, K.; Nieminen, M.S.; Sinisalo, J.; Pussinen, P. Quantitative PCR analysis of salivary pathogen burden in periodontitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Paqué, P.; Herz, C.; Jenzer, J.; Wiedemeier, D.; Attin, T.; Bostanci, N.; Belibasakis, G.; Bao, K.; Körner, P.; Fritz, T.; et al. Microbial Analysis of Saliva to Identify Oral Diseases Using a Point-of-Care Compatible qPCR Assay. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Könönen, E.; Müller, H.-P. Microbiology of aggressive periodontitis. Periodontol. 2000 2014, 65, 46–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yang, H.W.; Asikainen, S.; Doğan, B.; Suda, R.; Lai, C.H. Relationship of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans Serotype b to Aggressive Periodontitis: Frequency in Pure Cultured Isolates. J. Periodontol. 2004, 75, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thorbert-Mros, S.; Ali, N.; Ali, M.; Ayas, M.; Trullenque-Eriksson, A.; Dahlén, G. A comparative study on periodontitis and periodontitis-associated bacteria in Somali and non-Somali children and adolescents living in Trollhättan, Sweden. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2021, 130, e12843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pianeta, R.; Iniesta, M.; Castillo, D.M.; Lafaurie, G.I.; Sanz, M.; Herrera, D. Characterization of the Subgingival Cultivable Microbiota in Patients with Different Stages of Periodontitis in Spain and Colombia. A Cross-Sectional Study. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Haubek, D.; Poulsen, K.; Kilian, M. Microevolution and Patterns of Dissemination of the JP2 Clone of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3080–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Åberg, C.H.; Kwamin, F.; Claesson, R.; Dahlén, G.; Johansson, A.; Haubek, D. Progression of attachment loss is strongly associated with presence of the JP2 genotype of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: A prospective cohort study of a young adolescent population. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014, 41, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Primers/TaqMan probes for real-time PCR.
Table 1. Primers/TaqMan probes for real-time PCR.
Primers/Probe SetsProduct Size (bp)TargetReferences
Universal
5′-GATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCAC-3′
5′-TACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′
5′-FAM-CACGGTGAATACGTTCCCGGGC-TAMRA-3′
6916SrDNA[25]
A. actinomycetemcomitans non JP2
5′-CGCAAGTGCCATAGTTATCCACT-3′
5′-TCGTCTGCGTAATAAGCAAGAGAG-3′
5′-FAM-ATATTGTAGACATCGCCC-MGB-3′
14516SrDNA[26]
A. actinomycetemcomitansJP2
5′-TCT ATG AAT ACT GGA AAC TTG TTC AGA AT-3′
5′-GAA TAA GAT AAC CAA ACC ACA ATA TCC-3′
5′-FAM-ACA AAT CGT TGG CAT TCT CGG CGA A-TAMRA-3′
151ltxA[26]
P. gingivalis
5′- AGGCAGCTTGCCATACTGCG- 3′
5′- ACTGTTAGCAACTACCGATGT-3′
5′-FAM GCTAATGGGACGCATGCCTATCTTACAGCT-TAMRA-3′
40416SrDNA[25]
FAM 6-carboxyfluorescein, TAMRA tetramethylrhodamine, MGB minor groove binding.
Table 2. qPCR cycle program settings.
Table 2. qPCR cycle program settings.
Bacteria Cycles Settings
UniversalHold/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycles:
95°/10 min
95°/15 s
54° 30 s
72° 30 s
45
A. actinomycetemcomitans
non JP2/JP2genotype
Hold/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycles:
95°/10 min
95°/15 s
58°/40 s
72°/30 s
40
P. gingivalisHold/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycling/time:
Cycles:
95°/10 min
95°/15 s
58°/30 s
72°/30 s
40
Table 3. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the population.
Table 3. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the population.
VariablesNon-Periodontitis Patients
(21 (23.6))
Periodontitis Patients
(32 (60.4))
p Value
Age (years) *24.67 ± 1.8229.91 ± 9.940.021
Gender **
Male
Female

2 (9.5)
19 (90.5)

10 (31.3)
22 (68.8)
0.095
BOP *29.57 ± 10.2093.71 ± 12.88<0.001
Total mean of Probing *2.35± 0.255.54 ± 0.83<0.001
Total mean of CAL *----3.85 ± 1.39-----
PD of healthy sampling sites (mm) *1.90 ± 0.302.14 ± 0.480.061
PD of diseased sampling sites (mm) *----7.07 ± 1.36------
CAL in sampling sites (mm) *------6.35 ± 2.26----
*: Mean ± SD; **: n (%); PD: probing depth; CAL: clinical attachment level.
Table 4. Quantification levels of studied bacteria in saliva and healthy sites in non-periodontitis versus periodontitis subjects.
Table 4. Quantification levels of studied bacteria in saliva and healthy sites in non-periodontitis versus periodontitis subjects.
BacteriaNon-Periodontitis (n = 21)Periodontitis (n = 32)p Value
Universal *
Healthy Sites (copies/µL)
Saliva (copies/µL)

16.8 × 106 [14.0 × 106 − 27.0 × 106]
660,681 [516,038–728,127]
35.6 × 106 [24.8 × 106 − 43.3 × 106]
665,965 [582,570–738,491]
<0.001
1.00
A. actinomycetemcomitans
non JP2 *

Healthy sites (copies/µL)0.00 [0.00–0.00]0.00 [0.00–0.00]0.052
Saliva (copies/µL)0.00 [0.00–0.00]0.00 [0.00–0.00]0.139
P. gingivalis *
Healthy sites (copies/µL)
Saliva (copies/µL)

19.80 [0.00–1167]
8.00 [0.00–103]

179 [0.00–283,121]
236 [2.00–10,122]

<0.001
<0.001
A. actinomycetemcomitans JP2 clone *
Healthy sites (copies/µL)

Absent

Absent

NA
Saliva (copies/µL)0.00 [0.00–0.00]1.50 [0.00–116]<0.001
*: Median and interquartile range [IQR]; NA: not applicable.
Table 5. Comparison of the number of bacteria in the subgingival plaque between diseased and healthy sites in periodontitis patients.
Table 5. Comparison of the number of bacteria in the subgingival plaque between diseased and healthy sites in periodontitis patients.
Bacteria (Copies/µL)Healthy Sites
(n = 32)
Diseased Sites
(n = 32)
p Value
Pg *179 [0.00–283,121]1.52 × 107 [100,657–4.43 × 107]0.003
Universal *3.56 × 107 [2.48 × 107–4.33 × 107]5.04 × 107 [4.66 × 107–5.46 × 107]<0.001
Aa JP2 *0.00 [0.00–0.00]2.00 [0.00–413]<0.001
Aa non JP2 *0.00 [0.00–0.00]5.00 [0.00–2.78 × 106]0.001
*: Median and interquartile range [IQR]; Aa: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Pg: Porphyromonas gingivalis.
Table 6. Bacteria count in subgingival plaque samples from diseased sites in patients with Grade B versus Grade C periodontitis.
Table 6. Bacteria count in subgingival plaque samples from diseased sites in patients with Grade B versus Grade C periodontitis.
Bacteria (Copies/µL)Grade B Patients
(n = 5)
Grade C Patients
(n = 27)
p Value
Pg *1.54 × 107 [254.30–4.32 × 107]1.50 × 107 [115,216.08–4.55 × 107]0.420
Universal **4.70 × 107 ± 3.05 × 1065.19 × 107 ± 5.70 ×1060.075
Aa JP2 *2.00 [0.50–1.8 × 104]1.50 [0.00–3.14 × 106]0.905
Aa non JP2 *116.97 [0.00–1.88 × 106]2.50 [0.00–3.97 × 106]0.854
*: Median and interquartile range [IQR]; **: Mean ± SD; Aa: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Pg: Porphyromonas gingivalis.
Table 7. Interspecies correlations in subgingival plaque of all subjects.
Table 7. Interspecies correlations in subgingival plaque of all subjects.
Pg DSPg HSUniv. DSUniv. HSAa JP2 DSAa JP2 HSAa non JP2 DSAa non JP2 HS
Pg DS 0.105−0.0640.001NA0.934 *0.255
Pg HS −0.046−0.022−0.041NA0.2660.377 **
Univ. DS 0.165NA0.0660.051
Univ. HS 0.007NA−0.0970.247
Aa JP2 DS 0.049−0.102
Aa JP2 HS NANA
Aa non JP2DS
Aa non JP2HS
Aa: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Pg: Porphyromonas gingivalis; Univ: Universal; DS: diseased sites; HS: healthy sites. * p < 0.001; ** p = 0.007.
Table 8. Interspecies correlations in the saliva of all subjects.
Table 8. Interspecies correlations in the saliva of all subjects.
PgUniversalAa JP2Aa non JP2
P. gingivalis 0.1840.432 *0.261
Universal 0.2020.199
Aa JP2 0.505 **
Aa non JP2
Aa: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Pg: Porphyromonas gingivalis; * p = 0.002; ** p < 0.001.
Table 9. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of periodontitis Grade B and Grade C patients.
Table 9. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of periodontitis Grade B and Grade C patients.
Periodontitis Patients
(n = 32)
Grade B
5 (15.6)
GradeC
27 (84.4)
p Value
Age (years) *33.60 ± 10.4029.22 ± 9.970.375
Gender **
Male
Female

30.0%
9.1%

70.0%
90.9%

0.293
Mean of PD4.88 ± 0.265.64 ± 0.840.089
Mean of CAL2.79 ± 0.804.01 ± 1.400.103
PD of sampling sites *6.25 ± 0.507.19± 1.410.202
CAL of sampling sites * 4.50 ± 1.476.50 ± 2.250.079
*: Mean ± SD; **: n (%); PD: probing depth; CAL: clinical attachment level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reddahi, S.; Bouziane, A.; Dib, K.; Tligui, H.; Ennibi, O.k. qPCR Detection and Quantification of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Other Periodontal Pathogens in Saliva and Gingival Crevicular Fluid among Periodontitis Patients. Pathogens 2023, 12, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010076

AMA Style

Reddahi S, Bouziane A, Dib K, Tligui H, Ennibi Ok. qPCR Detection and Quantification of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Other Periodontal Pathogens in Saliva and Gingival Crevicular Fluid among Periodontitis Patients. Pathogens. 2023; 12(1):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reddahi, Sarah, Amal Bouziane, Kaoutar Dib, Houssain Tligui, and Oum keltoum Ennibi. 2023. "qPCR Detection and Quantification of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Other Periodontal Pathogens in Saliva and Gingival Crevicular Fluid among Periodontitis Patients" Pathogens 12, no. 1: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop