Next Article in Journal
Human Papilloma Virus: An Unraveled Enigma of Universal Burden of Malignancies
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Incubation Time on Trichothecene Production by Fusarium cerealis Isolated from Durum Wheat Grains
Previous Article in Journal
Rift Valley Fever Virus Primes Immune Responses in Aedes aegypti Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marketed Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Seeds: A Mycotoxin-Free Matrix Contaminated by Mycotoxigenic Fungi
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/pathogens12040565
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interacting Abiotic Factors Affect Growth and Mycotoxin Production Profiles of Alternaria Section Alternaria Strains on Chickpea-Based Media

by
Cindy J. Romero Donato
†,
María J. Nichea
†,
Eugenia Cendoya
,
Vanessa G. L. Zachetti
and
María L. Ramirez
*
Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología, (IMICO), CONICET-UNRC, Ruta 36 Km 601, Río Cuarto 5800, Córdoba, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2023, 12(4), 565; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040565
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxigenic Fungi Associated with Food Commodities during Cultivation, Storage and Marketing)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chickpea is susceptible to fungal infection and mycotoxin contamination. Argentina exports most of its chickpea production; thus, its quality is of concern. The Alternaria fungal genus was found to be prevalent in chickpea samples from Argentina. The species within this genus are able to produce mycotoxins, such as alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), and tenuazonic acid (TA). In this context, we evaluated the effect of water activity (0.99, 0.98, 0.96, 0.95, 0.94, 0.92, and 0.90 aW), temperature (4, 15, 25, and 30 °C), incubation time (7, 14, 21, and 28 days), and their interactions on mycelial growth and AOH, AME, and TA production on chickpea-based medium by two A. alternata strains and one A. arborescens strain isolated from chickpea in Argentina. Maximum growth rates were obtained at the highest aW (0.99) and 25 °C, with growth decreasing as the aW of the medium and the temperature were reduced. A. arborescens grew significantly faster than A. alternata. Mycotoxin production was affected by both variables (aW and temperature), and the pattern obtained was dependent on the strains/species evaluated. In general, both A. alternata strains produced maximum amounts of AOH and AME at 30 °C and 0.99–0.98 aW, while for TA production, both strains behaved completely differently (maximum levels at 25 °C and 0.96 aW for one strain and 30 °C and 0.98 aW for the other). A. arborescens produced maximum amounts of the three toxins at 25 °C and 0.98 aW. Temperature and aW conditions for mycotoxin production were slightly narrower than those for growth. Temperature and aW conditions assayed are those found during chickpea grain development in the field, and also could be present during storage. This study provides useful data on the conditions representing a risk for contamination of chickpea by Alternaria toxins.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) has been an important crop, particularly in Asia, although over the years, it has been adapted to many continents including the Americas. The genus Cicer, which includes the cultivated chickpea, belongs to the family Fabaceae, subfamily Papilionoideae. Like other pulses, chickpeas are well known for their soil fertility restoration value due to their ability to fix nitrogen, helping agricultural systems to be productive and sustainable. Furthermore, chickpeas are highly nutritious, having high protein, fiber, and fat contents, but a lower carbohydrate content than wheat. Chickpea plants also contain many bioactive compounds, such as phenolic acid and isoflavones [1].
Globally, soybeans lead legume production, followed by peanuts, dried beans, dry peas, and chickpeas, among others [2]. In recent years, the global demand for legumes has increased, and this trend is expected to continue in the future. The average consumption of legumes in the world is about 8 kg per capita per year [3], while that of Argentina reaches barely 800 g per capita per year [4]. Most of the Argentinean chickpea production is destined for export, with India, Pakistan, Turkey, Brazil, and Colombia being the main buyers of Argentinian chickpeas [5,6].
However, there are some problems that threaten chickpea permanence as a profitable crop in the region. One of these problems are fungal diseases, often associated with the presence of toxic secondary metabolites, such as mycotoxins. Mycotoxins cause significant economic losses due to their impact on human and animal health and the rejection or reduction of prices during marketing. More than 25 fungal pathogens are known to colonize this crop before and/or after harvest and greatly affect productivity, altering the vigour and longevity of the seeds [7]. The more common fungal genera isolated from chickpea around the world are Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, Alternaria, and Rhizopus [8].
Due to the lack of information in Argentina about the contamination of this legume with mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxins, our research group recently evaluated the occurrence of mycotoxins in 70 asymptomatic chickpea samples from the Córdoba province (Argentina). We observed a high frequency of contamination with species belonging to the genera Aspergillus (54%) and Alternaria (22%), followed by Fusarium, Chaetomium, Penicillium, and Rhizhopus. At the same time, the natural occurrence of the different mycotoxins was evaluated using a multitoxin methodology by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). As a result, contamination with Alternaria toxins, such as alternariol (AOH), was observed in all samples analyzed at levels ranging between 0.7 and 14.5 ng/g and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) in 30% of samples at levels ranging between 1.4 and 2.3 ng/g. In addition, Fusarium mycotoxins, such as beauvericin, deoxynivalenol, and zearalenone, were also detected [9]. Furthermore, due to the high prevalence of Alternaria, a phylogenetic analysis of 32 Alternaria strains isolated from chickpeas was carried out in order to identify the species based on the combined sequences of the tef1, gpd, and Alt a1 genes. All Alternaria strains clustered into the section Alternaria and were identified as A. alternata and A. arborescens. In addition, we determined the toxigenic profile of each strain and observed that most of them were able to coproduce AOH, AME, and TA [10]. These results suggest that, when consuming chickpeas, a potential risk for human health could exist, because this legume could present contamination with Alternaria and with its mycotoxins, which are not yet regulated in food.
Alternaria alternata is considered the most frequently isolated species within the genus and is perhaps the most cosmopolitan, isolated worldwide from both temperate and tropical climates. Alternaria arborescens is also a ubiquitous fungus that can be found in many types of plants and other substrates. They can grow on a wide variety of substrates, including dead plant material, food, soil, leather, and textiles and as saprophytes on the surface of roots, leaves, and seeds [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Currently, over 70 secondary metabolites produced by the Alternaria species are known. Exposure to Alternaria toxins has been associated with a wide variety of adverse health effects in humans and animals. The main Alternaria mycotoxins detected in food are AOH, AME, and TA, which have mutagenic, carcinogenic, and genotoxic effects [21,22]. TA may act as a mycotoxin and phytotoxin and has been reported to be more poisonous than AOH and AME in several animal species, such as mice, chickens, and dogs [23].
Fungal contamination, both in the field and during the storage of agricultural products, depends largely on ecophysiological factors, such as the water activity (aW), temperature, pH, fungal strain, and substrate where it grows with the first two factors being the most important, particularly for the genus Alternaria [24,25]. For this reason, knowledge about how the environmental factors influence growth and mycotoxin production can represent an important tool for the prediction, understanding, and prevention of mycotoxin contamination in food. TA, AME, and AOH production by the Alternaria species in relation to these factors has been studied in different substrates including soybean, grape, and tomato [26,27,28,29], focusing on A. alternata to the detriment of others species. At the moment, there is no information about A. alternata and A. arborescens studies being carried in chickpeas. As a result, research about the behavior of these species in chickpeas would provide useful information in order to predict their growth with the ensuing mycotoxin contamination.
The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of aW and temperature on the growth and production of AOH, AME, and TA by A. alternata and A. arborescens on a synthetic chickpea media. As a result, we provide more information about the influence of environmental factors on the contamination of this pulse with Alternaria toxins

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains

Three Alternaria section Alternaria strains (A. alternata RC-CR 767 and RC-CR 902; A. arborecens RC-CR 910), previously isolated from chickpeas in Argentina during the 2018 harvest season, were used. They were previously identified by morphological and molecular criteria [30,31,32,33,34]. For the molecular characterization, the 1-α elongation factor (tef1), Alternaria major allergen (Alt-a1), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd) gene were partially sequenced indicating that these isolates belong to the section Alternaria and can be characterized as A. alternata and A. arborescens. The ability of the strains to produce AOH, AME, and TA was determined in ground rice–corn steep liquor medium and detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [10]. All the strains are preserved at the Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) culture (RC) collection as spore suspensions in 15% glycerol frozen at −80 °C.

2.2. Media Preparation

Chickpeas harvested in Argentina were finely milled by using a Romer mill (Romer Labs Inc., Union, MO, USA). Mixtures of 2% (w/v) of milled chickpea in water were prepared, and 2% (w/v) agar (technical agar no. 2, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) was added. The aW of the media was modified by adding mixtures of water/glycerol instead of water to obtain target aW treatments of 0.99, 0.98, 0.96, 0.95, 0.94, 0.92, and 0.90 before autoclaving for 15 min at 121 °C [35]. The molten cooled media were vigorously mixed before pouring into 9 cm Petri plates (20 mL per plate), cooled, and stored at 4 °C in sealed bags prior to use. The aW of representative samples of media was checked with an Aqualab Series 3 (Decagon devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, USA). In order to detect any significant deviation of the media aW values, uninoculated control plates were prepared and measured at the end of the experiment.

2.3. Inoculation, Incubation, and Growth Assessment

Chickpea-based media were centrally inoculated with a mycelial plug of 3 mm diameter and removed with a sterile punch from the active growth area of each Alternaria section Alternaria strain grown on the synthetic nutrient agar (SNA) at 25 °C for seven days. After inoculation, plates with an equal aW were placed in polyethylene bags and incubated at 4, 15, 25, and 30 °C for a period of 28 days.
A full factorial design with 3 replicates was applied. The factors analyzed were strains (3) × aW levels (7) × temperature (4), and as a response, the growth rate was analyzed.

2.4. Mycotoxin Analysis

For mycotoxin extraction after 7, 14, 21, and 28 incubation days, three agar plugs (4 mm diameter) were cut with a hole punch from the edge of a colony from each Petri plate, weighed, and placed in a 4 mL amber vial. The extraction method used for the three toxins was the microscale extraction technique proposed by Smedsgaard [36] modified in three extraction steps suitable for the mycotoxin produced by species of the genus Alternaria [37].
AOH, AME, and TA were detected and quantified by HPLC using the equipment and settings described by Nichea et al. [10]. The recovery rate of the method was >80% when different amounts of Alternaria mycotoxins (AOH, AME, and TA) were added (range 0.1 to 10 µg/g). For the three toxins, the limit of detection (LOD; signal-to-noise ratio 3) was 0.01 µg/g, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was established as three times the detection limit.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The growth rates and mycotoxin concentrations (transformed to Log10) were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SigmaStat for Windows version 2.03 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was judged at the level p ≤ 0.001. When the analysis was statistically significant, the post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure was used for separation of the means (LSD-Fisher p < 0.05). Surface response and contour map graphs were performed using Sigma Plot v.10.0 (Systat Software Inc., Hounslow, London, UK).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of aW and Temperature on Growth Rates

The results obtained for the growth rates of the three strains studied, under different aW and temperature conditions, are presented in Figure 1. Both factors, aW and temperature, influenced the mycelial growth rate of the three Alternaria section Alternaria species under study. The data show that A. arborecens RC-CR910 presented the highest growth rate followed by A. alternata RC-CR902 and finally by A. alternata RC-CR767. In general, the response of the growth rate to aW and temperature was similar for both species. Maximum growth rates were observed at the highest aW (0.99) evaluated at 25 °C, and they declined when the water availability in the media decreased. Regarding incubation temperature, higher growth rates were observed at 25 °C, decreasing in the following order: 30, 15, and 4 °C. Moreover, all of the strains under study were unable to grow at aW levels ≤ 0.92 at 4 °C.
An analysis of variance of the effect of a single factor (aW, temperature, and strain) and its double and triple interactions revealed that all factors and their interactions had a significant influence on the growth rate. The factor that influenced the fungal growth the most was temperature followed by aW and the temperature × aW interaction (Table 1). A posteriori analysis showed that the strains, aW levels, and the different temperatures studied were significantly different from each other (LSD-Fisher p < 0.05).
With the growth rate data obtained from the three strains evaluated (two A. alternata and one A. arborescens) under different growing conditions, contour maps were generated in an attempt to identify the optimum and marginal aW and temperature conditions for growth (Figure 2). As both A. alternata behaved similarly, just one contour map is shown for this species. From these contour maps, the optimum conditions, regardless of the species, is around 20–30 °C at 0.99–0.95 aW. On the other hand, marginal conditions for growth are over a wider temperature range and limited to about 0.92–0.90 aW levels.

3.2. Effects of aW, Temperature, and Incubation Time on Mycotoxin Production

Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the effects of aW, temperature, and incubation time on AOH, AME, and TA production by both Alternaria species grown in a chickpea-based media over 21 days. The results of this study show that the time course of production of the toxins evaluated varied with temperature and aW. Statistically, the effects of aW, temperature, and incubation time and their interactions were found to be significant (Table 2).
In general, the production of the three toxins increased with incubation time. The maximum production was reached at 14/21/28 days, depending on the toxin. Overall, the toxin concentrations produced by A. alternata RC-CR902 were higher than those produced by A. alternata RC-CR767 and A. arborescens RC-CR910 under almost all the tested conditions.
We will present the results separately for both Alternaria species, starting with both A. alternata strains.
AOH maximum production for A. alternata RC-RC902 was reached with temperatures of 25 and 30 °C at 0.98 aW after 14 and 28 days of incubation (Figure 3). On the other hand, for the strain RC-CR767, the maximum level was obtained at 30 °C after 14 days of incubation at the highest aW tested (0.99), followed by 25 °C at 0.96 aW after 28 days of incubation. At 15 °C, a significant reduction in AOH production was observed for both strains. At the lowest temperature tested (4 °C), the production of this mycotoxin was almost inhibited; it was only detected, at very low levels, with 0.99 and 0.98 aW, after 28 days of incubation.
The pattern of AME production was similar to those observed for AOH production by the two A. alternata strains (Figure 4). The highest AME production by the strain RC-CR767 was obtained at 0.99 aW and 30 °C after 14 days of incubation, in comparison to the strain RC-CR902, which presented the highest level at 0.98 aW and 30 °C after 28 days of incubation. At temperatures of 30 °C and 25 °C, the strain RC-CR902 showed high production levels at 0.98 aW, and mycotoxin concentration increased during the incubation time, while the strain RC-CR767 presented the most favorable conditions at 0.99 aW at 30 °C and 0.96 aW at 25 °C. At 15 °C, a significant reduction in AME production occurred for the two strains under study. At 4 °C, AME production was detected at trace levels of 0.99 and 0.98 aW.
For TA production, a maximum concentration was obtained for A. alternata RC-CR 797 at 0.96 and 0.94 aW and 25 °C after 21 and 14 days of incubation, respectively (Figure 5). RC-CR902 produced the maximum TA level at 0.98 aW after 14 days of incubation at the highest temperature tested. In addition, for this strain at 15 °C, high levels of TA production were observed at 0.99, 0.98, and 0.96 aW in comparison with the other A. alternata strain. At the lowest temperature tested (4 °C), a decrease in production levels was observed. However, these were still high compared to those observed for AOH and AME, especially by the strain RC-CR902 at ≥0.94 aW.
In relation to A. arborescens, this strain reached the maximum production of AOH, AME, and TA at 0.98 aW and 25 °C after 28 days of incubation. Considering the incubation temperature, the production of the three toxins was higher at 25 °C, decreasing in the following order: 30, 15, and 4 °C. At the lowest temperature tested (4 °C), no AME production was observed regardless of the aW, but traces of AOH and TA were detected at 0.99 and 0.98 aW after 28 days of incubation.
The mycotoxin (AOH, AME, and TA) production data obtained were used to develop contour maps in order to identify the optimal and marginal conditions of aW and temperature and the range of conditions for mycotoxin production after 28 days of incubation (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this study represents the first approach to understanding the interaction effect of aW and temperature conditions on the growth and mycotoxin production by two Alternaria species belonging to section Alternata (A. alternata and A. arborescens) on chickpea-based media. It is important to remark that the strains used in the present study were previously isolated from chickpea produced in Argentina and identified using multigenic phylogenetic analyses [10]. All these details make the results obtained more reliable, because the taxonomy of the Alternaria genus is quite controversial. Both species A. alternata and A. arborescens share morphological features and are very difficult to be differentiated using traditional methods. This could be the reason why all the strains were classified in the past as A. alternata, thus leading to a general belief that it is the most common species isolated in food products.
Chickpea is sown in Argentina between April and June during the autumn season; thus, part of the crop cycle coincides with a gradual decrease in average temperature and luminous intensity, a shortened photoperiod, and scarce rainfall. The rest of the cycle (mainly the reproductive phase) unfolds under a continuous increase in temperature, luminous intensity, and rainfall [38]. The optimum temperature for the chickpea’s reproductive phase ranges from 5 °C to 30 °C. For all these reasons, the temperatures used in the present study where chosen to simulate the conditions in which this crop grows in the fields. In addition, the aW values used in the present study cover the fluctuation of this parameter during early seed formation (R5), until the seeds reach full physiological maturity (R8) [39]. On the other hand, these conditions of aW and temperatures can also be present during inappropriate storage.
In the present study, not only temperature, but also aW affected growth, and the pattern obtained was independent of the strains/species evaluated. Optimal aW levels for growth were 0.99 to 0.95, with an optimal temperature ranging between 20 and 30 °C and the highest growth rates for the three strains at 0.99 aW and 25 °C. We defined as optimal those growth rates that were above 50% of the maximum growth rates obtained. No growth was observed at ≤0.92 aW at 4 °C.
Previous studies about the requirements of water and temperature for A. alternata growth have revealed that this fungus requires a minimum of 0.84–0.88 aW, and optimal growth has been observe at 0.98 to 1.0 aW at 25 °C [26,27,28,29,40,41].
The effect of environmental conditions on A. arborescens growth has not been previously studied in depth. Only few attempts can be found in the literature. Vaquera et al. [40] studied the effect of aW and temperature on the growth of one strain of A. arborescens in a tomato-based media. They informed that the highest growth rate was observed at 0.995 aW and 30 °C (7.21 mm/day), while the lowest occurred at 0.950 aW and 6 °C, but they did not find statistical differences between the growth rates obtained at 0.975 aW at 30 °C and 0.995 aW at 25 and 30 °C. Camiletti et al. [42] studied the effect of temperature (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C) on mycelial growth of A. arborescens and A. alternarta strains associated with preharvest fruit drop in California citrus in Potato Dextrose Agar (with freely available water ≈ 0.995 aW). They observed that A. alternata had the capacity to grow faster than A. arborescens at all the evaluated temperatures, except at 25 and 35 °C, when the growth patterns were similar for both species. Our results for A. arboresces are in agreement with those obtained by Oviedo et al. [41] and partially agree with those informed by Camiletti et al. [42]. It is important to point out that, according to our results, A. arboresces grows significantly (p < 0.05) faster than both A. alternata strains, even though the growth patterns obtained through all the conditions were the same.
In the present study, both variables (aW and temperature) affected mycotoxin production, and the pattern obtained was dependent on the strains/species evaluated. In general, both A. alternata strains produced maximum amounts of AOH and AME at the highest temperature analyzed, 30 °C and 0.99–0.98 aW. For TA production, both A. alternata strains behaved completely different; RC-CR76 maximum levels were obtained at 25 °C and 0.96 aW, and for RC-CR902, the conditions were 30 °C and 0.98 aW. For A. arborescens, maximum AOH, AME, and TA production occurred at the same conditions: 25 °C and 0.98 aW. In general, all these aW and temperature conditions were not optimal for growth and were slightly narrower.
There are several studies in the literature dealing with the effect of aW and temperature on mycotoxin production by A. alternata strains on natural substrates or on media-based natural substrates [26,27,28,29,41,43], but only a few have been performed with A. arborescens [40,44]. It is important to remark that none of them have been performed on chickpea. However, in general, the results of the present work are similar to those obtained by the authors mentioned above. Although the basic culture media (chickpea, soybean, grape, tomato pulp, etc.) may vary, mycotoxin production tends to be similar under controlled environmental conditions.
Because Alternaria section Alternata species (mainly A. alternata) are isolated with a high frequency in chickpea in Argentina and worldwide [8] and the natural occurrence of AOH and AME in this substrate has been informed, the contour maps developed with the results of the present study can provide very useful information to effectively facilitate risk prediction about growth and mycotoxin production during chickpea grain development, harvesting, and storage. All the reported information is valid because the aW and temperature ranges used in these assays simulated the ranges that occur during chickpea development in the field and those that can be found during improper storage.

5. Conclusions

So far, there is insufficient monitoring data on Alternaria mycotoxin occurrence and an absence of statutory or guideline limits set for these compounds in foods and feeds by regulatory authorities worldwide. However, there is increasing awareness among European authorities and the scientific community about the high incidence rate of Alternaria toxins in relevant foodstuffs and about population exposure through diet [45]. It is well known that the presence of Alternaria toxins in food can be reduced or prevented by using good agricultural practices, good storage and transport conditions, and good manufacturing practices. The present study provides useful information in that direction.

Author Contributions

Methodology, C.J.R.D., M.J.N. and V.G.L.Z.; resources, M.L.R.; data curation, C.J.R.D., M.J.N. and E.C.; writing, C.J.R.D. and M.J.N.; writing—review and editing, E.C. and M.L.R.; project administration, M.L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by PICT-2017-2493 grant from ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

C.J.R. is fellow of CONICET and M.L.R., E.C. and V.G.L.Z. are members of the Research Career of CONICET.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rachwa-Rosiak, D.; Nebesny, E.; Budryn, G. Chickpeas—Composition, nutritional value, health benefits, application to bread and snacks: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rawal, V.; Navarro, D. The Global Economy of Pulses; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019; p. 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Food Balance. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  4. Cámara de Legumbres de la República Argentina. Available online: https://clera.com.ar/es/tag/consumo-legumbres/ (accessed on 21 February 2023).
  5. Espeche, C.M.; Vizgarra, O.N.; Mamani, S.Y.; Mendez, D.; Ploper, L.D. El garbanzo una buena opción para el invierno. Av. Agroind. 2015, 36, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Garzon, J.M. Mercado mundial de garbanzo. In El Cultivo de Garbanzo en Tucumán.; Ploper, L.D., Ed.; Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres: Tucumán, Argentina, 2021; pp. 99–110. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, W.; Sharma, H.C.; Muehlbauer, F.J. Compendium of Chickpea and Lentil Diseases and Pests; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2011; p. 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramirez, M.L.; Cendoya, E.; Nichea, M.; Zachetti, V.; Chulze, S. Impact of toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins in chickpea: A review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 23, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romero, C.J.; Sulyok, M.; Chulze, S.; Ramirez, M.L. Mycobiota and mycotoxin occurrence in chickpea produced in Argentina. In Proceedings of the International Commission on Food Mycology Conference, Freising, Germany, 26 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nichea, M.J.; Cendoya, E.; Romero, C.J.; Humaran, J.F.; Zachetti, V.G.L.; Palacios, S.A.; Ramirez, M.L. Phylogenetic Analysis and Toxigenic Profile of Alternaria Species Isolated from Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) in Argentina. Diversity 2022, 14, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meena, M.; Gupta, S.K.; Swapnil, P.; Zehra, A.; Dubey, M.K.; Upadhyay, R.S. Alternaria toxins: Potential virulence factors and genes related to pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Somma, S.; Pose, G.; Pardo, A.; Mulè, G.; Pinto, V.F.; Moretti, A.; Logrieco, A.F. AFLP variability, toxin production, and pathogenicity of Alternaria species from Argentinean tomato fruits and puree. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 145, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Greco, M.; Patriarca, A.; Terminiello, L.; Fernández Pinto, V.; Pose, G. Toxigenic Alternaria species from Argentinean blueberries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Polizzotto, R.; Andersen, B.; Martini, M.; Grisan, S.; Assante, G.; Musetti, R. A polyphasic approach for the characterization of endophytic Alternaria strains isolated from grapevines. J. Microbiol. Methods 2012, 88, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Harteveld, D.O.C.; Akinsanmi, O.; Drenth, A. Multiple Alternaria species groups are associated with leaf blotch and fruit spot diseases of apple in Australia. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andersen, B.; Thrane, U. Food-borne fungi in fruit and cereals and their production of mycotoxins. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006, 571, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Belisario, A.; Santori, A. Gray necrosis of hazelnut fruit: A fungal disease causing fruit drop. Acta Hortic. 2009, 845, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hong, S.G.; Maccaroni, M.; Figuli, P.J.; Pryor, B.M.; Belisario, A. Polyphasic classification of Alternaria isolated from hazelnut and walnut fruit in Europe. Mycol. Res. 2006, 110, 1290–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patriarca, A.; Azcarate, M.P.; Terminiello, L.; Fernández Pinto, V. Mycotoxin production by Alternaria strains isolated from Argentinean wheat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Andersen, B.; Krøger, E.; Roberts, R.G. Chemical and morphological segregation of Alternaria arborescens, A. infectoria and A. tenuissima species-groups. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Puntscher, H.; Cobankovic, I.; Marko, D.; Warth, B. Quantitation of free and modified Alternaria mycotoxins in European food products by LC-MS/MS. Food Control. 2019, 102, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schoevers, E.J.; Santos, R.R.; Roelen, B.A.J. Alternariol disturbs oocyte maturation and preimplantation development. Mycotoxin Res. 2020, 36, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fraeyman, S.; Croubels, S.; Devreese, M.; Antonissen, G. Emerging Fusarium and Alternaria mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicity and toxicokinetics. Toxins 2017, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mannaa, M.; Kim, K.D. Influence of temperature and water activity on deleterious fungi and mycotoxin production during grain storage. Mycobiology 2018, 45, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thanushree, M.P.; Sailendri, D.; Yoha, K.S.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Mycotoxin contamination in food: An exposition on spices. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oviedo, M.S.; Ramirez, M.L.; Barros, G.G.; Chulze, S.N. Influence of water activity and temperature on growth and mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata on irradiated soya beans. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 149, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pose, G.; Patriarca, A.; Kyanko, V.; Pardo, A.; Fernández Pinto, V. Water activity and temperature effects on mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata on a synthetic tomato medium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 142, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, H.B.; Patriarca, A.; Magan, N. Alternaria in Food: Ecophysiology, Mycotoxin Production and Toxicology. Mycobiology 2015, 43, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Prendes, L.P.; Fontana, A.R.; Merín, M.G.; D´ Amario Fernández, A.; Bottini, R.; Ramirez, M.L.; Morata de Ambrosini, V.I. Natural occurrence and production of tenuazonic acid in wine grapes in Argentina. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 23, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hong, S.G.; Cramer, R.A.; Lawrence, C.B.; Pryor, B.M. Alt a 1 allergen homologs from Alternaria and related taxa: Analysis of phylogenetic content and secondary structure. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria: An Identification Manual; CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. Berbee, M.L.; Pirseyedi, M.; Hubbard, S. Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 1999, 91, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Somma, S.; Amatulli, M.T.; Masiello, M.; Moretti, A.; Logrieco, A.F. Alternaria species associated to wheat black point identified through a multilocus sequence approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 293, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ramires, F.A.; Masiello, M.; Somma, S.; Villani, A.; Susca, A.; Logrieco, A.F.; Luz, C.; Meca, G.; Moretti, A. Phylogeny and mycotoxin characterization of Alternaria species isolated from wheat grown in Tuscany, Italy. Toxins 2018, 10, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dallyn, H.; Fox, A. Spoilage of material of reduced water activity by xerophilic fungi. In Microbial Growth and Survival in Extreme Environments; Corry, J.E.L., Gould, G.H., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 129–139. [Google Scholar]
  36. Smedsgaard, J. Micro-scale extraction procedure for standardized screening of fungal metabolite production in cultures. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 760, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Andersen, B.; Krøger, E.; Roberts, R.G. Chemical and morphological segregation of Alternaria alternata, A. gaisen and A. longipes. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bas-nahas, S.S.; Romero, E.R. Influence of thermal factor on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) development, yield and yield components. Rev. Agron. Noroeste Arg. 2020, 40, 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  39. Toledo, R.E. Ecofisiologia de garbanzo. In El Cultivo de Garbanzo (Cicer Arietumun L.) En Argentina; Carreras, J., Mazzuferi, V., Karlin, M., Eds.; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba: Córdoba, Argentina, 2016; pp. 89–114. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vaquera, S.; Patriarca, A.; Fernández Pinto, V. Water activity and temperature effects on growth of Alternaria arborescens on tomato medium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 185, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oviedo, M.S.; Ramirez, M.L.; Barros, G.G.; Chulze, S.N. Impact of water activity and temperature on growth and alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether production of Alternaria alternata isolated from soybean. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Camiletti, B.X.; Lichtemberg, P.S.F.; Paredes, J.A.; Carraro, T.A.; Velascos, J.; Michailides, T.J. Characterization, pathogenicity, and fungicide sensitivity of Alternaria isolates associated with preharvest fruit drop in California citrus. Fungal Biol. 2022, 126, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, D.; Xue, Y.; Kouc, X.; Shan, C.; Jiang, C.; Tang, F.; Ji, H. Growth modeling kinetics of Alternaria alternata in dried jujube at different temperatures. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, e125621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vaquera, S.; Patriarca, A.; Fernández Pinto, V. Influence of environmental parameters on mycotoxin production by Alternaria arborescens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 219, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/553 of 5 April 2022 on Monitoring the Presence of Alternaria Toxins in Food. OJ L 107 06.04.2022. p. 90. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022H0553 (accessed on 21 February 2023).
Pathogens 12 00565 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of water activity (0.90–0.99) and temperature 4 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 15 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 25 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 30 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i004) on growth rate (mm/day) of Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media. Different letters indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of water activity (0.90–0.99) and temperature 4 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 15 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 25 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 30 °C (Pathogens 12 00565 i004) on growth rate (mm/day) of Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media. Different letters indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Pathogens 12 00565 g001
Pathogens 12 00565 g002 550
Figure 2. Two-dimensional contour maps of Alternaria alternata RC-CR767 and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 growth profiles in relation to temperature and water activity. Similar colors refer to similar growth rates (mm/day).
Figure 2. Two-dimensional contour maps of Alternaria alternata RC-CR767 and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 growth profiles in relation to temperature and water activity. Similar colors refer to similar growth rates (mm/day).
Pathogens 12 00565 g002
Pathogens 12 00565 g003 550
Figure 3. Altenariol concentrations (µg/g) produced by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media adjusted to different aW levels and temperatures at different incubation times: 7 (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 14 (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 21 (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 28 (Pathogens 12 00565 i004) days.
Figure 3. Altenariol concentrations (µg/g) produced by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media adjusted to different aW levels and temperatures at different incubation times: 7 (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 14 (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 21 (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 28 (Pathogens 12 00565 i004) days.
Pathogens 12 00565 g003
Pathogens 12 00565 g004 550
Figure 4. Altenariol monomethyl ether concentrations (µg/g) produced by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media adjusted to different aW levels and temperatures at different incubation times: 7 (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 14 (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 21 (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 28 (Pathogens 12 00565 i004).
Figure 4. Altenariol monomethyl ether concentrations (µg/g) produced by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media adjusted to different aW levels and temperatures at different incubation times: 7 (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 14 (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 21 (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 28 (Pathogens 12 00565 i004).
Pathogens 12 00565 g004
Pathogens 12 00565 g005 550
Figure 5. Tenuazonic acid (µg/g) produced by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media adjusted to different aW levels and temperatures at different incubation times: 7 (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 14 (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 21 (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 28 (Pathogens 12 00565 i004).
Figure 5. Tenuazonic acid (µg/g) produced by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in a chickpea-based media adjusted to different aW levels and temperatures at different incubation times: 7 (Pathogens 12 00565 i001), 14 (Pathogens 12 00565 i002), 21 (Pathogens 12 00565 i003), and 28 (Pathogens 12 00565 i004).
Pathogens 12 00565 g005
Pathogens 12 00565 g006 550
Figure 6. Two-dimensional contour maps of alternariol, altenariol monomethyl ether, and tenuazonic acid production by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in relation to temperature and water activity after 28 days of incubation. The numbers on the scale refer to toxin levels (µg/g).
Figure 6. Two-dimensional contour maps of alternariol, altenariol monomethyl ether, and tenuazonic acid production by Alternaria section Alternaria strains: Alternaria alternata RC-CR767, Alternaria alternata RC-CR902, and Alternaria arborecens RC-CR910 in relation to temperature and water activity after 28 days of incubation. The numbers on the scale refer to toxin levels (µg/g).
Pathogens 12 00565 g006
Table
Table 1. Analysis of variance on the effects of strain (S), temperature (T), and water activity (aW) and their interactions on growth rate by three strains of Alternaria section Alternaria in chickpea-based media.
Table 1. Analysis of variance on the effects of strain (S), temperature (T), and water activity (aW) and their interactions on growth rate by three strains of Alternaria section Alternaria in chickpea-based media.
Source of Variationdf aGrowth Rate (mm/day)
MS bF c
S20.028512.70 *
T3131.07157,309.634 *
aW684.34036,876.853 *
S × T60.007573.311 *
S × aW120.10345.225 *
T × aW189.2924063.036 *
S × T × aW360.028712.530 *
* Significant p ≤ 0.001; a Degrees of freedom; b Mean square; c Snedecor-F.
Table
Table 2. Analysis of variance on the effects of water activity (aW), temperature (T), and incubation time (D) and their interactions on alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), and tenuazonic acid (TA) production by two Alternaria alternata strains: RC-CR767 and RC-CR902 and Alternaria arborescens RC-CR910 in chickpea-based media.
Table 2. Analysis of variance on the effects of water activity (aW), temperature (T), and incubation time (D) and their interactions on alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), and tenuazonic acid (TA) production by two Alternaria alternata strains: RC-CR767 and RC-CR902 and Alternaria arborescens RC-CR910 in chickpea-based media.
Alternaria alternata RC-CR767
Source of Variationdf aAOHAMETA
MS bF cMSFMSF
T352.752375.63 *13.224133.42 *10.82267.09 *
aW67.56340.66 *2.72742.13 *6.67167.70 *
D310.03451.66 *2.46062.44 *8.91219.82 *
T × aW181.4665.96 *0.91931.55 *1.3533.30 *
T × D91.0547.13 *0.48659.53 *0.8721.35 *
aW × D180.8036.25 *0.31912.79 *0.9222.69 *
T × aW × D540.5725.76 *0.17111.61 *0.7518.48 *
Alternaria alternata RC-CR902
Source of Variationdf aAOHAMETA
MS bF cMSFMSF
T361.38923.72 *19.801940.48 *14.191370.11 *
aW615.82753.56 *5.20509.63 *25.942503.82 *
D311.07527.21 *2.1204.44 *8.58828.23 *
T × aW181.9090.44 *1.34131.32 *1.18114.27 *
T × D91.0550.06 *0.7270.22 *2.12204.67 *
aW × D180.5626.73 *0.1919.25 *1.59153.18 *
T × aW × D540.8640.94 *0.2827.47 *1.08104.26 *
Alternaria arborescens RC-CR910
Source of Variationdf aAOHAMETA
MS bF cMSFMSF
T311.91217.51 *40.162062.23 *7.42460.94 *
aW655.651016.64 *8.16419.46 *3.69229.42 *
D313.20241.16 *6.470332.22 *6.24387.69 *
T × aW181.9335.31 *1.8293.77 *0.5635.24 *
T × D90.5121.38 *0.7739.46 *0.5635.11 *
aW × D181.179.41 *0.5628.96 *0.3924.6 *
T × aW × D540.488.73 *0.4925.31 *0.4427.69 *
* Significant p ≤ 0.001; a Degrees of freedom; b Mean square; c Snedecor-F.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romero Donato, C.J.; Nichea, M.J.; Cendoya, E.; Zachetti, V.G.L.; Ramirez, M.L. Interacting Abiotic Factors Affect Growth and Mycotoxin Production Profiles of Alternaria Section Alternaria Strains on Chickpea-Based Media. Pathogens 2023, 12, 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040565

AMA Style

Romero Donato CJ, Nichea MJ, Cendoya E, Zachetti VGL, Ramirez ML. Interacting Abiotic Factors Affect Growth and Mycotoxin Production Profiles of Alternaria Section Alternaria Strains on Chickpea-Based Media. Pathogens. 2023; 12(4):565. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040565

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romero Donato, Cindy J., María J. Nichea, Eugenia Cendoya, Vanessa G. L. Zachetti, and María L. Ramirez. 2023. "Interacting Abiotic Factors Affect Growth and Mycotoxin Production Profiles of Alternaria Section Alternaria Strains on Chickpea-Based Media" Pathogens 12, no. 4: 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040565

APA Style

Romero Donato, C. J., Nichea, M. J., Cendoya, E., Zachetti, V. G. L., & Ramirez, M. L. (2023). Interacting Abiotic Factors Affect Growth and Mycotoxin Production Profiles of Alternaria Section Alternaria Strains on Chickpea-Based Media. Pathogens, 12(4), 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040565

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop