Next Article in Journal
Broad-Spectrum Antivirals against Multiple Human and Animal Coronaviruses Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Simple and Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Canine Parainfluenza Virus 5 (Orthorubulavirus mammalis) Using a Reverse-Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Local Administration of Meglumine Antimoniate and Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Alone or in Combination with a Toll-like Receptor 4 Agonist for the Treatment of Papular Dermatitis due to Leishmania infantum in Dogs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving African Swine Fever Surveillance Using Fluorescent Rapid Tests
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Feline Parvovirus Lethal Outbreak in a Group of Adult Cohabiting Domestic Cats

1
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padua, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
3
Ambulatorio Veterinario Piombinese, Via Torino 38, 57025 Piombino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(6), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060822
Submission received: 11 May 2023 / Revised: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 9 June 2023 / Published: 11 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostics of Animal Viral Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Feline panleukopenia is a highly contagious and often fatal disease in cats. The virus, known as feline panleukopenia virus (FPV), primarily affects kittens and unvaccinated cats. It is transmitted through contact with infected cats or their bodily fluids, as well as contaminated objects and environments. The diagnosis of FPV infection can be confirmed through a combination of clinical signs, blood tests, and fecal testing. Prevention through vaccination is recommended for all cats. This case report describes an outbreak of feline panleukopenia in a group of unvaccinated domestic cats that resulted in acute mortality. The lesions were evaluated using histopathology, and the specific viral strain was characterized using molecular techniques. The clinical course of the outbreak was peracute, with a hemorrhagic pattern and 100% of lethality. The observed clinical-pathological pattern was unusual; nevertheless, molecular studies did not highlight peculiar genomic features of the parvovirus isolate. The outbreak affected 3 out of 12 cats in a very short time. However, the prompt application of biosecurity measures and vaccination resulted in an effective interruption of virus spread. In conclusion, we could assume that the virus found the ideal conditions to infect and replicate at high titers, resulting in a particularly aggressive outbreak.

1. Introduction

Feline panleukopenia (FPL) is a worldwide highly contagious disease of Felidae caused by infection with Protoparvovirus carnivoran1 (https://ictv.global/taxonomy; accessed on 8 June 2023), a nonenveloped, single-stranded DNA viral species in the genus Protoparvovirus, which includes canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus [1]. Feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) is the major cause of feline panleukopenia, but canine parvovirus (CPV) can also infect and replicate in cats, although rarely [2,3]. FPV has a specific tropism for cells with high mitotic activity, such as bone marrow, lymphoid tissue, and intestinal crypt cells [4]. Viral infection can cause a wide range of signs depending on the virulence of the viral strain, the health status of the host, and the presence of coinfection, but the most common clinical signs are lethargy, anorexia, diarrhea, immunosuppression and often vomiting. In addition, infections acquired during pregnancy may result in abortion or kittens affected by the central nervous system and ocular defects, such as cerebellar hypoplasia, hydrocephalus, retinal dysplasia, and optic nerve hypoplasia [2,5]. The hemogram characterized by severe leukopenia with neutropenia and lymphopenia is considered a diagnostic feature when associated with typical clinical signs [3,5]. The course of the disease is often severe, with an estimated mortality rate from 25% to 100% [6,7]. Due to its high environmental resistance, the virus can remain infectious for months, and disinfection is a key factor in preventing disease transmission in environments with high animal density such as multi-cat households and animal shelters [4,8,9]. Current guidelines recommend vaccination against FPV for domestic cats [10].
Because either natural infection or vaccination is common in the population, the identification of FPV-specific antibodies through serological diagnosis is almost inconclusive, while routine diagnosis is based on virus detection [11,12,13]. Viral antigens can be detected in the feces of cats with diarrhea or in secretions and excretions using various commercially available ELISA tests. Direct diagnosis can also be performed via virus isolation or nucleic acid detection using PCR [12,13]. In a small percentage of cases of feline panleukopenia disease, the causative agent is canine parvovirus (CPV), and the correct virus identification is only possible with molecular analysis [14,15]. Despite the widespread vaccination program for FPV, feline panleukopenia remains an important disease, with a high prevalence in the feline population, often with features of severe pathogenicity [2,16,17,18]. However, few data are available on the role of FPV strains in determining the disease outcome or severity [19]. In this study, we describe an outbreak of feline panleukopenia in a group of unvaccinated domestic cats that resulted in acute mortality. The lesions were evaluated using histopathology, and the specific viral strain was characterized using molecular techniques.

2. Case Report

The outbreak occurred in a group of 12 cohabiting adult common European cats living in the countryside of the province of Leghorn, central Italy (Table 1). The cats, although domestic, had an outdoor life, roaming freely in the surrounding rural area, and were unvaccinated. In May 2021, an adult female cat was admitted to a private first-aid veterinary clinic, unconscious, with severe hemorrhagic diarrhea and vomiting. The cat died a few hours after the admission.
The following day, a female cat from the same cohort showed subcorneal hemorrhage, and developed melena, hematemesis, and nasal bleeding 24 h after the first clinical signs. The animal died within 1 day. Due to the peracute status and the rapid progression of clinical signs, it was not possible to perform hematological and biochemical analysis, or diagnostic imaging on the first and second cats.
Two days after the second case, a third male cat was hospitalized with anorexia and depression, and 24 h after the first clinical signs, the cat presented severe abdominal pain, intestinal bleeding, and vomiting. Thus, an abdominal X-ray assessment was performed showing dilated and air-filled intestinal loops. The next day, hypothermia and blindness were also present. The cat died two days after the first clinical signs.
During hospitalization, a fluid resuscitation protocol was performed on all three cats with one or multiple 20 mL/kg boli of lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS). Then, a continuous rate of infusion of LRS was maintained throughout the entire time of hospitalization [20].
All three cats tested negative for parvovirus and coronavirus in point-of-care (POC) tests (Theratest Parvo/Corona, Bioforlife, Italy; Test SNAP Parvo, IDEXX, Westbrook, ME, USA) applied on fecal samples collected during the first clinical examination, and also tested negative for FIV and FeLV (SNAP FIV/FeLV Combo Test, IDEXX, USA) on whole-blood samples. Blood work revealed severe anemia, panleukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as hypoalbuminemia and hypoproteinemia.
The second and third deceased cats (named cat #1 and cat #2) were sent to the Department of Veterinary Sciences (DSV) of Pisa for anatomopathological, bacteriological, and virological investigations.
In the hypothesis of an infectious cause, the remaining healthy cats (aged 1 to 12 years) were isolated to limit the spread of the disease. The objects that had been in contact with the cats were destroyed, and surfaces were thoroughly cleaned and disinfected with 1% sodium hypochlorite. Finally, core vaccination was administered (two doses at an interval of 4 weeks) to all the surviving cats, and no further clinical cases were reported.

2.1. Anatomopathological Examination

The postmortem examination of the cats revealed hemorrhagic fecal soiling of the perineal area and severe bilateral hyphema in cat #1 (Figure 1) and right eye hyphema in cat #2 (Figure 2). Both cats showed severe anemia with mild serum–blood effusions in the peritoneal and pleural cavities and mild discoloration of the liver and kidneys. In both cats, but more extensively in cat #1, the gastrointestinal tract showed severe multiple segmental hemorrhages with the transmural involvement of large portions of the stomach, small intestine, and colon (Figure 3), with hemorrhage also involving the mesenteric perivascular tissue and lymph nodes. The intestine contained bloody liquid material. These lesions were interpreted as multiple gastrointestinal infarctions. The bone marrow of cat #1 was pale and gelatinous. Minor hemorrhages were observed in the mediastinum, right chest wall, and left apical pulmonary lobe of cat #2 (Figure 4).
Samples for histopathological examination were collected from all major organs, including ocular globes. Globes were fixed in Davidson’s solution, while other tissue samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The fixed tissues were then routinely processed for histology and 5 μm thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome stain.
Histopathological examination of the stomach, ileum, and colon showed severe diffuse transmural hemorrhages, with widespread deposition of fibrin and platelets in small gastrointestinal vessels. Numerous granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes infiltrated the mucosa, submucosa, and muscle layer, in the presence of edema, congestion, and hemorrhage (Figure 5). In the small intestine, the inflammatory infiltration of the lamina propria of the villi was associated with crypt dilation and necrosis, as well as the occasional presence of intranuclear bodies (Figure 6). In the kidneys, glomerular thrombocapillaritis was observed in the presence of acellular protein material in the Bowman’s space. In the lungs, multifocal peribronchiolar hemorrhage was observed with diffuse acute capillary congestion. Macrophage accumulation with erythrophagocytosis was noted in the cortical sinuses of the mesenteric lymph nodes. No significant lesions were observed in other tissues.

2.2. Bacteriology

Lung, spleen, ileum, and colon samples were homogenized in sterile saline water using a Stomacher® 80 Biomaster instrument. A loopful of each homogenate was stretched on Columbia Blood Agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated at 37 °C under aerobic and anaerobic conditions for up to 10 days. Plates were checked daily for bacterial growth, and no pathogenic bacteria were detected in the analyzed samples.

2.3. Virology

2.3.1. Viral Isolation

Tissues collected from cat #1 during necroscopy were transferred to a homogenizer bag in the presence of 1.5 mL of serum-free MEM containing 1% penicillin–streptomycin. The tissues were homogenized in a Stomacher® 80 Biomaster using 4 min high-frequency strokes, and then 1 mL of medium was collected and transferred to a 2 mL sterile tube. Cellular debris was pelleted via centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 min. The medium was finally collected and used to infect CRFK cells in a 25 cm2 flask. The CRFK cell line was provided by Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia (Brescia), Laboratorio Centro Substrati Cellulari were grown in MEM in the presence of 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. Cells were infected at the mitotic phase. At 48 h post-infection (p.i.), typical parvovirus CPE was visible in the flask infected with ileum samples: Cells appeared shrunken, elongated, rounded, and detached. At 72 h p.i., CPE was even more pronounced, with the cells appearing mostly detached and rounded (Figure 7). Cells and medium were collected and centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at −80 °C, and the cell pellet was stored at −20 °C for nucleic acid extraction.

2.3.2. Molecular Analyses

DNA and RNA were extracted from a portion of the spleen, lung, ileum, and colon of cats #1 and #2 using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit and RNeasy Plus Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Molecular analyses were performed on all samples to detect Protoparvovirus carnivoran1 and Bocaparvovirus spp, using the HotStarTaq® Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and Coronavirus spp., Astrovirus spp., and Rotavirus, using the OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Germany).
The primer sets and PCR conditions used in this study are summarized in Table 2. For Protoparvovirus carnivoran1, the diagnostic protocol of Schatzberg and colleagues was applied, using three primer pairs amplifying genes encoding structural proteins (VP1 and VP2) of both FPV and CPV [17]. The ileum samples of cats #1 and #2 were positive for Protoparvovirus carnivoran1 using primer pairs 1 and 2. The positivity was confirmed using Sanger sequencing (BMR genomics, Padova, Italy) and BLAST analysis, which reported a close matching with the feline panleukopenia virus. All samples tested negative for the other viruses.

2.3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

To achieve a better strain characterization, the sequencing of longer genomic regions was attempted on the viral isolates. The pellet from cells showing CPE (see Section 2.3.1) was then used for DNA extraction using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The presence of Protoparvovirus carnivoran1was confirmed using the same protocol previously mentioned. PCRs were performed on the DNA extracted from infected cells using the HotStarTaq® Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The complete NS1 and VP portions of the FPV genome were amplified and sequenced. Primer sets are summarized in Table 3. The amplicons were subjected to Sanger sequencing (BMR genomics, Padova, Italy).
Sequences were visually inspected for a quality check using BioEdit [27], and consensus sequences were assembled with Chromas Pro 2.1.8 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia). Two separate datasets of international reference sequences were downloaded from GenBank for VP1 and NS1 genes (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). The VP1 and NS1 sequences (Acc. Num. OQ718429) were aligned to the respective reference datasets using MAFFT and trimmed using MEGA X [28,29]. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using a maximum likelihood (ML) approach implemented in MEGA X, choosing a substitution model based on the lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Branch support was calculated by performing 1000 bootstrap replicates, and bootstrap values ≥70% were considered reliable.
Regardless of the considered dataset (NS1, VP1, or VP2), the isolated strain clustered with FPV strains. The analysis was repeated on the VP2 dataset benefitting from the larger sequence availability, which demonstrated its clustering with other Italian strains collected from cats between 2004 and 2019 (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

The feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) is a highly contagious pathogen that is mainly transmitted via direct contact with infected cats. FPV causes feline panleukopenia, a disease characterized by a severe reduction in the white blood cell count, immunosuppression, and severe gastroenteritis with degeneration of the intestinal villi and consequent impaired nutrient absorption [3,7,30]. The outcome ranges from subclinical to peracute infection, but the most common is the acute form, which initially presents with specific signs, such as fever, depression, and anorexia, commonly followed by vomiting unrelated to feeding and watery-to-hemorrhagic diarrhea [2]. Because FPV has a predilection for replication in rapidly dividing cells, kittens are most susceptible to infection, but cats of all ages are at risk, especially if they are unvaccinated and live in high-density areas such as animal shelters [9,31]. Although vaccination is considered essential according to the World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) [10], many owners do not follow the recommendations, and although there may be good immunity in the domestic cat population, cases of parvovirus are common, indicating that the pathogen is still circulating [2,31,32,33].
In this report, we describe a severe outbreak in a group of cohabiting unvaccinated adult cats. The cats lived in the countryside, and although domestic, they had an outdoor life, roaming the surrounding area and feeding outside the house. The clinical course of the outbreak was peracute, with a hemorrhagic pattern, 100% of lethality, and rapid spread. Signs and lesions showed a hemorrhagic pattern of the disease and were consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Secondary bacterial sepsis can be hypothesized following hyperacute FPV infection in unvaccinated cats. The observed clinical–pathological pattern affecting adult cats was quite peculiar since a marked hemorrhagic pattern, instead of lymphoid tissue depletion, villous atrophy, and small intestinal crypt epithelial cell necrosis, was observed [3]. Nevertheless, molecular studies did not highlight peculiar genomic features of the parvovirus isolate. In fact, in the phylogenetic tree reconstructed on the highly variable VP2 region, the strain obtained from cat #1 appeared to cluster with the strains previously identified in Italy (Figure 6). No peculiar amino acid substitutions were identified, lessening the role of the viral phenotype in the abnormal pathogenicity.
The outbreak affected 3 out of 12 cats in a very short time. However, the prompt application of biosecurity measures and vaccination could have resulted in an effective interruption of virus spread. The severity of the disease did not correlate with any known genetic predisposition, as the cats belonged to different genetic lines. Virus isolation and subsequent molecular analysis identified a parvovirus, which was most likely the principal agent responsible for the outbreak, but we cannot exclude the presence of coinfections that could have synergistically increased the pathogenicity of FPV. Although the cats tested negative for the main viruses responsible for enteritis (coronavirus, rotavirus, astrovirus, and bocavirus) during molecular analysis, the involvement of an uninvestigated virus is possible, also considering the potential contacts of the study population with wild animals. In the province of Leghorn, wildlife is abundant and tends to approach inhabited centers in search of food. The outdoor life of the cats increased the likelihood of contact with local wildlife, either directly or indirectly. No other domestic animals had been introduced into the house in the recent past, so wild animals could be considered as the initial source of the outbreak both because of the possibility of sharing outdoor areas of the house and also possible contact with food and water available to the domestic cats. Protoparvovirus carnivoran1also infects wild mammals of the families Felidae, Mustelidae, Procyonidae, and Viverridae (including raccoons, ring-tailed cats, foxes, and minks). Virus exchange between the domestic and wild populations has been proven, particularly in overlapping/shared areas [34,35,36,37,38]. Molecular analyses seem to exclude this hypothesis, suggesting a closer relationship of this strain with other strains sampled from the domestic population, but subsampling of wildlife is common, and thus related variants may have been missed.
Another possibility is that the virus entered the study population indirectly via fomites, considering the high stability of FPV in the environment.
Remarkably, the POC tests used in the veterinary clinic were negative not only for coronavirus, FIV, and FeLV but also for parvovirus, even when different tests were used.
This result could be tentatively explained by a dilution effect of the severe hemorrhagic diarrhea, which might have affected the sensitivity of the test. In addition, antigen shedding may be intermittent, limiting the sensitivity of the test, especially if it is performed only once, and it is not the first time that false-negative results have been found [31]. On the other hand, the negative result should not be attributed to poor test inclusivity, as the strain described here does not appear to have any peculiar phenotypical features that might have hindered the detection.
In conclusion, because the infected cats lived closely together, sharing areas inside and outside the house, litter trays, and feeding areas, and they were not vaccinated, we could assume that the virus found the ideal conditions to infect and replicate at high titers, resulting in a particularly aggressive outbreak.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12060822/s1, Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree reconstructed on the NS1 gene of available Protoparvovirus carnivoran1 strains downloaded from Genbank.; Figure S2: Phylogenetic tree reconstructed on the VP1 gene of available Protoparvovirus carnivoran1 strains downloaded from Genbank.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.P., M.F. (Mario Forzan), M.F. (Milena Fornai), M.S. and M.M.; methodology, M.I.P., M.F. (Mario Forzan), G.F., C.M.T., M.F. (Milena Fornai), F.B., C.C. and M.M.; software, M.I.P., G.F., C.M.T. and M.M.; formal analysis, M.I.P., G.F. and C.M.T.; investigation, M.I.P., M.F. (Mario Forzan), M.F. (Milena Fornai), M.S., C.C. and M.M.; resources, M.S., C.C. and M.M.; data curation, M.I.P., G.F., C.M.T. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.P., M.F. (Mario Forzan), G.F., C.M.T., F.B., C.C. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.I.P., M.F. (Mario Forzan), G.F., C.M.T., M.F. (Milena Fornai), M.S., C.C. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Fondi di Ateneo University of Pisa.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

We received the owners’ consent for clinical and postmortem procedures.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cotmore, S.F.; Agbandje-McKenna, M.; Chiorini, J.A.; Mukha, D.V.; Pintel, D.J.; Qiu, J.; Soderlund-Venermo, M.; Tattersall, P.; Tijssen, P.; Gatherer, D.; et al. The Family Parvoviridae. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Barrs, V.R. Feline Panleukopenia: A Re-Emergent Disease. Vet. Clin. Small Anim. Pract. 2019, 49, 651–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sykes, J.E. Feline Panleukopenia Virus Infection and Other Viral Enteritides. In Canine and Feline Infectious Diseases; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 187–194. ISBN 9781437707953. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lamm, C.G.; Rezabek, G.B. Parvovirus Infection in Domestic Companion Animals. Vet. Clin. N. Am.—Small Anim. Pract. 2008, 38, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tuzio, H. Feline Panleukopenia. Infect. Dis. Manag. Anim. Shelter. Second Ed. 2021, Chapter 15, 337–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Steinel, A.; Parrish, C.R.; Bloom, M.E.; Truyen, U. Parvovirus Infections in Wild Carnivores. J. Wildl. Dis. 2001, 37, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Truyen, U.; Addie, D.; Belák, S.; Boucraut-Baralon, C.; Egberink, H.; Frymus, T.; Gruffydd-Jones, T.; Hartmann, K.; Hosie, M.J.; Lloret, A.; et al. Feline Panleukopenia ABCD Guidelines on Prevention and Management. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2009, 11, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Poole, G.M. Stability of a Modified, Live Panleucopenia Virus Stored in Liquid Phase. Appl. Microbiol. 1972, 24, 663–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rehme, T.; Hartmann, K.; Truyen, U.; Zablotski, Y.; Bergmann, M. Feline Panleukopenia Outbreaks and Risk Factors in Cats in Animal Shelters. Viruses 2022, 14, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stone, A.E.S.; Brummet, G.O.; Carozza, E.M.; Kass, P.H.; Petersen, E.P.; Sykes, J.; Westman, M.E. 2020 AAHA/AAFP Feline Vaccination Guidelines. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2020, 22, 813–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scott, F.W.; Geissinger, C.M. Long-Term Immunity in Cats Vaccinated with an Inactivated Trivalent Vaccine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1999, 60, 652–658. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schunck, B.; Kraft, W.; Truyen, U. A Simple Touch-down Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Canine Parvovirus and Feline Panleukopenia Virus in Feces. J. Virol. Methods 1995, 55, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schatzberg, S.J.; Haley, N.J.; Barr, S.C.; Parrish, C.; Steingold, S.; Summers, B.A.; Lahunta, A.; Kornegay, J.N.; Sharp, N.J.H. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification of Parvoviral DNA from the Brains of Dogs and Cats with Cerebellar Hypoplasia. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2003, 17, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Truyen, U.; Evermann, J.F.; Vieler, E.; Parrish, C.R. Evolution of Canine Parvovirus Involved Loss and Gain of Feline Host Range. Virology 1996, 215, 186–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ikeda, Y.; Mochizuki, M.; Naito, R.; Nakamura, K.; Miyazawa, T.; Mikami, T.; Takahashi, E. Predominance of Canine Parvovirus (CPV) in Unvaccinated Cat Populations and Emergence of New Antigenic Types of CPVs in Cats. Virology 2000, 278, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nader, N.; Sonea, C.; Cretu, D.M.; Gurau, M.R.; Aniela, R.; Gheorghe, I.; Otelea, F.; Udrea, L. Panleukopenia Outbreak Diagnosed by Real Time qPCR in a Catterry in Romania. Available online: https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/agr-2022-0018 (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  17. Demeter, Z.; Palade, E.A.; Rusvai, M. Feline Panleukopenla Virus Infection in Various Species from Hungary. Lucr. St. Med. Vet. 2010, 43, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Brussel, K.; Carrai, M.; Lin, C.; Kelman, M.; Setyo, L.; Aberdein, D.; Brailey, J.; Lawler, M.; Maher, S.; Plaganyi, I.; et al. Distinct Lineages of Feline Parvovirus Associated with Epizootic Outbreaks in Australia, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates. Viruses 2019, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tucciarone, C.M.; Franzo, G.; Legnardi, M.; Lazzaro, E.; Zoia, A.; Petini, M.; Furlanello, T.; Caldin, M.; Cecchinato, M.; Drigo, M. Genetic Insights into Feline Parvovirus: Evaluation of Viral Evolutionary Patterns and Association between Phylogeny and Clinical Variables. Viruses 2021, 13, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mazzaferro, E.; Powell, L.L. Fluid Therapy for the Emergent Small Animal Patient: Crystalloids, Colloids, and Albumin Products. Vet. Clin. N. Am.—Small Anim. Pract. 2022, 52, 781–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lau, S.K.P.; Woo, P.C.Y.; Yeung, H.C.; Teng, J.L.L.; Wu, Y.; Bai, R.; Fan, R.Y.Y.; Chan, K.H.; Yuen, K.Y. Identification and Characterization of Bocaviruses in Cats and Dogs Reveals a Novel Feline Bocavirus and a Novel Genetic Group of Canine Bocavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 2012, 93, 1573–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chu, D.K.W.; Leung, C.Y.H.; Gilbert, M.; Joyner, P.H.; Ng, E.M.; Tse, T.M.; Guan, Y.; Peiris, J.S.M.; Poon, L.L.M. Avian Coronavirus in Wild Aquatic Birds. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 12815–12820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chu, D.K.W.; Poon, L.L.M.; Guan, Y.; Peiris, J.S.M. Novel Astroviruses in Insectivorous Bats. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 9107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Flores, P.S.; Mendes, C.A.S.; Travassos, C.E.P.F.; Mariano, F.A.; Rangel, M.F.N.; Mendes, G.S.; Santos, N. RVA in Pet, Sheltered, and Stray Dogs and Cats in Brazil. Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2022, 49, 100667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pérez, R.; Calleros, L.; Marandino, A.; Sarute, N.; Iraola, G.; Grecco, S.; Blanc, H.; Vignuzzi, M.; Isakov, O.; Shomron, N.; et al. Phylogenetic and Genome-Wide Deep-Sequencing Analyses of Canine Parvovirus Reveal Co-Infection with Field Variants and Emergence of a Recent Recombinant Strain. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tucciarone, C.M.; Franzo, G.; Mazzetto, E.; Legnardi, M.; Caldin, M.; Furlanello, T.; Cecchinato, M.; Drigo, M. Molecular Insight into Italian Canine Parvovirus Heterogeneity and Comparison with the Worldwide Scenario. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 66, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hall, T.; Biosciences, I.; Carlsbad, C. BioEdit: An Important Software for Molecular Biology. GERF Bull. Biosci. 2011, 2, 60–61. [Google Scholar]
  28. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT Online Service: Multiple Sequence Alignment, Interactive Sequence Choice and Visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2018, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Parrish, C.R. Pathogenesis of Feline Panleukopenia Virus and Canine Parvovirus. In Parvoviruses; Taylor & Francis Ltd.: Abingdon, UK, 2005; pp. 429–434. ISBN 9781444114782. [Google Scholar]
  31. Litster, A.; Benjanirut, C. Case Series of Feline Panleukopenia Virus in an Animal Shelter. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2014, 16, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jenkins, E.; Davis, C.; Carrai, M.; Ward, M.P.; O’Keeffe, S.; van Boeijen, M.; Beveridge, L.; Desario, C.; Buonavoglia, C.; Beatty, J.A.; et al. Feline Parvovirus Seroprevalence Is High in Domestic Cats from Disease Outbreak and Non-outbreak Regions in Australia. Viruses 2020, 12, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Miranda, C.; Vieira, M.J.; Silva, E.; Carvalheira, J.; Parrish, C.R.; Thompson, G. Genetic Analysis of Feline Panleukopenia Virus Full-Length VP2 Gene in Domestic Cats Between 2006–2008 and 2012–2014, Portugal. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kelman, M.; Harriott, L.; Carrai, M.; Kwan, E.; Ward, M.P.; Barrs, V.R. Phylogenetic and Geospatial Evidence of Canine Parvovirus Transmission Betweenwild Dogs and Domestic Dogs at the Urban Fringe in Australia. Viruses 2020, 12, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Miranda, C.; Santos, N.; Parrish, C.; Thompson, G. Genetic Characterization of Canine Parvovirus in Sympatric Free-Ranging Wild Carnivores in Portugal. J. Wildl. Dis. 2017, 53, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Canuti, M.; Mira, F.; Sorensen, R.G.; Rodrigues, B.; Bouchard, É.; Walzthoni, N.; Hopson, M.; Gilroy, C.; Whitney, H.G.; Lang, A.S. Distribution and Diversity of Dog Parvoviruses in Wild, Free-Roaming and Domestic Canids of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, e2694–e2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Duarte, M.D.; Henriques, A.M.; Barros, S.C.; Fagulha, T.; Mendonça, P.; Carvalho, P.; Monteiro, M.; Fevereiro, M.; Basto, M.P.; Rosalino, L.M.; et al. Snapshot of Viral Infections in Wild Carnivores Reveals Ubiquity of Parvovirus and Susceptibility of Egyptian Mongoose to Feline Panleukopenia Virus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Calatayud, O.; Esperón, F.; Velarde, R.; Oleaga, Á.; Llaneza, L.; Ribas, A.; Negre, N.; de la Torre, A.; Rodríguez, A.; Millán, J. Genetic Characterization of Carnivore Parvoviruses in Spanish Wildlife Reveals Domestic Dog and Cat-Related Sequences. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cat #1. Bilateral hyphema.
Figure 1. Cat #1. Bilateral hyphema.
Pathogens 12 00822 g001
Figure 2. Cat #2. Right hyphema.
Figure 2. Cat #2. Right hyphema.
Pathogens 12 00822 g002
Figure 3. Cat #1. Severe and extensive gastrointestinal infarctions.
Figure 3. Cat #1. Severe and extensive gastrointestinal infarctions.
Pathogens 12 00822 g003
Figure 4. Cat #2. Hemorrhage in the mediastinum and right apical pulmonary lobe.
Figure 4. Cat #2. Hemorrhage in the mediastinum and right apical pulmonary lobe.
Pathogens 12 00822 g004
Figure 5. Cat #1, ileum. Severe necrohemorrhagic enteritis with intravascular coagulation within the submucosal vessels (arrows) (HE, 80×).
Figure 5. Cat #1, ileum. Severe necrohemorrhagic enteritis with intravascular coagulation within the submucosal vessels (arrows) (HE, 80×).
Pathogens 12 00822 g005
Figure 6. Cat #1, ileum. Crypts containing sloughing epithelial cells with amphophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies (arrow) (HE, 400×).
Figure 6. Cat #1, ileum. Crypts containing sloughing epithelial cells with amphophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies (arrow) (HE, 400×).
Pathogens 12 00822 g006
Figure 7. Virus isolation: CRFK cells were infected at the mitotic phase, and pictures were taken with an inverted microscope at 40× magnification: (A) mock (72 h); (B) 48 h p.i.; (C) 72 h p.i.
Figure 7. Virus isolation: CRFK cells were infected at the mitotic phase, and pictures were taken with an inverted microscope at 40× magnification: (A) mock (72 h); (B) 48 h p.i.; (C) 72 h p.i.
Pathogens 12 00822 g007
Figure 8. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the complete VP2 sequence of the reference dataset. CPV and FPV strains are colored green and blue. In the right insert, the clade comprising the strain isolated in the present study (highlighted in red) is magnified.
Figure 8. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the complete VP2 sequence of the reference dataset. CPV and FPV strains are colored green and blue. In the right insert, the clade comprising the strain isolated in the present study (highlighted in red) is magnified.
Pathogens 12 00822 g008
Table 1. Age and status of all cohabiting cats.
Table 1. Age and status of all cohabiting cats.
Cat No.AgeStatus
15Died few hours after clinical signs
2 (cat #1)7Died 24 h after clinical signs; submitted to DSV
3 (cat #2)5Died 48 h after clinical signs; submitted to DSV
41I–V
51I–V
62I–V
74I–V
85I–V
98I–V
109I–V
1111I–V
1211I–V
I–V: Isolated, vaccinated, and without clinical signs.
Table 2. Primer set and PCR conditions used in this study for virological investigation.
Table 2. Primer set and PCR conditions used in this study for virological investigation.
Viral TargetPrimers SequencesMelting T°
(°C)
Amplicon Length
(bps)
Reference
Protoparvovirus carnivoran1Pair 1Fw: ACGTGGTGTAACTCAAATGG
Rw: GCATTTGGTAGACAACATGGT
55215[13]
Pair 2Fw: GGGTGTGTTAGTAAAGTGGG
Rw: CGCTGCTTATCTTCGCTCTG
193
Pair 3Fw: CAAACAAATAGAGCATTGGGC
Rw: GCTGAGGTTGGTTATAGTGCACC
184
BocaparvovirusFw: GCCAGCACNGGNAARACMAA
Rw: CATNAGNCAYTCYTCCCACCA
55141[21]
CoronavirusFw: GGKTGGGAYTAYCCKAARTG
Rw: TGYTGTSWRCARAAYTCRTG
Fw nested: GGTTGGGACTATCCTAAGTGTGA
Rw nested: CCATCATCAGATAGAATCATCAT
48440[22]
AstrovirusFw a: GARTTYGATTGGRCKCGKTAYGA
Fw b: GARTTYGATTGGRCKAGGTAYGA
Fw nested a: CGKTAYGATGGKACKATHCC
Fw nested b: AGGTAYGATGGKACKATHCC
Rw: GGYTTKACCCACATNCCRAA
50422[23]
RotavirusFw: GACGGVGCRACTACATGGT
Rw: GTCCAATTCATNCCTGGTGG5
55379[24]
Table 3. Primers used in this study for phylogenetic analysis.
Table 3. Primers used in this study for phylogenetic analysis.
Primer NameSequence 5′-3′PositionReference
NS_FextGACCGTTACTGACATTCGCTTC206–227[25]
NS_FintGTTGAAACCACAGTGACGACAG1055–1076
NS_RextGGAGAACCAACTAACCCTTC2460–2441
NS_RintCACCTGAAGACTGGATGATG1186–1167
2161_FTTGGCGTTACTCACAAAGACGTGC2161–2184
4823_RGTTGTTATGGTGTGGGTGGTTGGT4823–4800
VP1_Seq_F2GGATTTCTACGGGTACTTTC2713–2732[26]
VP1_Seq_F3AGGTGATGAATTTGCTACAGG3368–3388
VP1_Seq_F4GCTACCAACAGATCCAATTG3887–3906
VP1_Seq_R2CTCAGCCACCAACTAAAGTTT3090–3070
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pacini, M.I.; Forzan, M.; Franzo, G.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Fornai, M.; Bertelloni, F.; Sgorbini, M.; Cantile, C.; Mazzei, M. Feline Parvovirus Lethal Outbreak in a Group of Adult Cohabiting Domestic Cats. Pathogens 2023, 12, 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060822

AMA Style

Pacini MI, Forzan M, Franzo G, Tucciarone CM, Fornai M, Bertelloni F, Sgorbini M, Cantile C, Mazzei M. Feline Parvovirus Lethal Outbreak in a Group of Adult Cohabiting Domestic Cats. Pathogens. 2023; 12(6):822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pacini, Maria Irene, Mario Forzan, Giovanni Franzo, Claudia Maria Tucciarone, Milena Fornai, Fabrizio Bertelloni, Micaela Sgorbini, Carlo Cantile, and Maurizio Mazzei. 2023. "Feline Parvovirus Lethal Outbreak in a Group of Adult Cohabiting Domestic Cats" Pathogens 12, no. 6: 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060822

APA Style

Pacini, M. I., Forzan, M., Franzo, G., Tucciarone, C. M., Fornai, M., Bertelloni, F., Sgorbini, M., Cantile, C., & Mazzei, M. (2023). Feline Parvovirus Lethal Outbreak in a Group of Adult Cohabiting Domestic Cats. Pathogens, 12(6), 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop